ABSTRACT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists, mostly warfarin, for the main indications for oral anticoagulation, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and prevention of embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. While DOACs offer practical, fixed-dose anticoagulation in many patients, specific restrictions or contraindications may apply. DOACs are not sufficiently effective in high-thrombotic risk conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome and mechanical heart valves. Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis may benefit from DOACs, but the bleeding risk, particularly in those with gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, must be carefully weighed. In patients with frailty, excess body weight, and/or moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs must be cautiously administered and may require laboratory monitoring. Reversal agents have been developed and approved for life-threatening bleeding. In addition, the clinical testing of potentially safer anticoagulants such as factor XI(a) inhibitors is important to further optimize anticoagulant therapy in an increasingly elderly and frail population worldwide.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Aged , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Warfarin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Administration, OralABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage who are receiving factor Xa inhibitors have a risk of hematoma expansion. The effect of andexanet alfa, an agent that reverses the effects of factor Xa inhibitors, on hematoma volume expansion has not been well studied. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients who had taken factor Xa inhibitors within 15 hours before having an acute intracerebral hemorrhage to receive andexanet or usual care. The primary end point was hemostatic efficacy, defined by expansion of the hematoma volume by 35% or less at 12 hours after baseline, an increase in the score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of less than 7 points (scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse neurologic deficit) at 12 hours, and no receipt of rescue therapy between 3 hours and 12 hours. Safety end points were thrombotic events and death. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were assigned to receive andexanet, and 267 to receive usual care. Efficacy was assessed in an interim analysis that included 452 patients, and safety was analyzed in all 530 enrolled patients. Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for factor Xa inhibitors. Of the patients receiving usual care, 85.5% received prothrombin complex concentrate. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 150 of 224 patients (67.0%) receiving andexanet and in 121 of 228 (53.1%) receiving usual care (adjusted difference, 13.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6 to 22.2; P = 0.003). The median reduction from baseline to the 1-to-2-hour nadir in anti-factor Xa activity was 94.5% with andexanet and 26.9% with usual care (P<0.001). Thrombotic events occurred in 27 of 263 patients (10.3%) receiving andexanet and in 15 of 267 (5.6%) receiving usual care (difference, 4.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 9.2; P = 0.048); ischemic stroke occurred in 17 patients (6.5%) and 4 patients (1.5%), respectively. There were no appreciable differences between the groups in the score on the modified Rankin scale or in death within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who were receiving factor Xa inhibitors, andexanet resulted in better control of hematoma expansion than usual care but was associated with thrombotic events, including ischemic stroke. (Funded by Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Disease and others; ANNEXA-I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03661528.).
Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Factor Xa , Hematoma , Recombinant Proteins , Humans , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Male , Female , Cerebral Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Factor Xa/therapeutic use , Factor Xa/adverse effects , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hematoma/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Acute DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a chronic, progressive disorder, and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation are associated with increased risks of thromboembolism and heart failure. Catheter ablation as initial therapy may modify the pathogenic mechanism of atrial fibrillation and alter progression to persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We report the 3-year follow-up of patients with paroxysmal, untreated atrial fibrillation who were enrolled in a trial in which they had been randomly assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation or to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. All the patients had implantable loop recorders placed at the time of trial entry, and evaluation was conducted by means of downloaded daily recordings and in-person visits every 6 months. Data regarding the first episode of persistent atrial fibrillation (lasting ≥7 days or lasting 48 hours to 7 days but requiring cardioversion for termination), recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (defined as atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds), the burden of atrial fibrillation (percentage of time in atrial fibrillation), quality-of-life metrics, health care utilization, and safety were collected. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were enrolled, with 154 patients assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation and 149 assigned to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Over 36 months of follow-up, 3 patients (1.9%) in the ablation group had an episode of persistent atrial fibrillation, as compared with 11 patients (7.4%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.70). Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia occurred in 87 patients in the ablation group (56.5%) and in 115 in the antiarrhythmic drug group (77.2%) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). The median percentage of time in atrial fibrillation was 0.00% (interquartile range, 0.00 to 0.12) in the ablation group and 0.24% (interquartile range, 0.01 to 0.94) in the antiarrhythmic drug group. At 3 years, 8 patients (5.2%) in the ablation group and 25 (16.8%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group had been hospitalized (relative risk, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.66). Serious adverse events occurred in 7 patients (4.5%) in the ablation group and in 15 (10.1%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group. CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with catheter cryoballoon ablation was associated with a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation or recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia over 3 years of follow-up than initial use of antiarrhythmic drugs. (Funded by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Network of Canada and others; EARLY-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02825979.).
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Cryosurgery , Humans , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Cryosurgery/adverse effects , Cryosurgery/methods , Recurrence , Tachycardia/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Disease Progression , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of early as compared with later initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in persons with atrial fibrillation who have had an acute ischemic stroke is unclear. METHODS: We performed an investigator-initiated, open-label trial at 103 sites in 15 countries. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to early anticoagulation (within 48 hours after a minor or moderate stroke or on day 6 or 7 after a major stroke) or later anticoagulation (day 3 or 4 after a minor stroke, day 6 or 7 after a moderate stroke, or day 12, 13, or 14 after a major stroke). Assessors were unaware of the trial-group assignments. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or vascular death within 30 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included the components of the composite primary outcome at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: Of 2013 participants (37% with minor stroke, 40% with moderate stroke, and 23% with major stroke), 1006 were assigned to early anticoagulation and 1007 to later anticoagulation. A primary-outcome event occurred in 29 participants (2.9%) in the early-treatment group and 41 participants (4.1%) in the later-treatment group (risk difference, -1.18 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.84 to 0.47) by 30 days. Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 14 participants (1.4%) in the early-treatment group and 25 participants (2.5%) in the later-treatment group (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.07) by 30 days and in 18 participants (1.9%) and 30 participants (3.1%), respectively, by 90 days (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.06). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 participants (0.2%) in both groups by 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or vascular death at 30 days was estimated to range from 2.8 percentage points lower to 0.5 percentage points higher (based on the 95% confidence interval) with early than with later use of DOACs. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and others; ELAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03148457.).
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Embolism/etiology , Embolism/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Intracranial Hemorrhages/chemically induced , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , RecurrenceABSTRACT
Exenatide, a promising cardioprotective agent, protects against cardiac structural remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. Combined blockade of sodium and potassium channels is valuable for managing atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we explored whether exenatide displayed anti-AF effects by inhibiting human Kv1.5 and Nav1.5 channels. We used the whole-cell patch-clamp technique to investigate the effects of exenatide on hKv1.5 and hNav1.5 channels expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and studied the effects of exenatide on action potential (AP) and other cardiac ionic currents in rat atrial myocytes. Additionally, an electrical mapping system was used to explore the effects of exenatide on electrical properties and AF activity in isolated rat hearts. Finally, a rat AF model, established using acetylcholine and calcium chloride, was employed to evaluate the anti-AF potential of exenatide in rats. Exenatide reversibly suppressed IKv1.5 with IC50 of 3.08 µM, preferentially blocked the hKv1.5 channel in its closed state, and positively shifted the voltage-dependent activation curve. Exenatide also reversibly inhibited INav1.5 with IC50 of 3.30 µM, negatively shifted the voltage-dependent inactivation curve, and slowed its recovery from inactivation with significant use-dependency at 5 and 10 Hz. Furthermore, exenatide prolonged AP duration and suppressed the sustained K+ current (Iss) and transient outward K+ current (Ito), but without inhibition of L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) in rat atrial myocytes. Exenatide prevented AF incidence and duration in rat hearts and rats. These findings demonstrate that exenatide inhibits IKv1.5 and INav1.5in vitro and reduces AF susceptibility in isolated rat hearts and rats.
Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Atrial Fibrillation , Exenatide , Kv1.5 Potassium Channel , Myocytes, Cardiac , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel , Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers , Animals , Humans , Male , Rats , Action Potentials/drug effects , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/metabolism , Exenatide/pharmacology , Exenatide/therapeutic use , HEK293 Cells , Kv1.5 Potassium Channel/antagonists & inhibitors , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/metabolism , NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/genetics , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Device-detected atrial fibrillation (also known as subclinical atrial fibrillation or atrial high-rate episodes) is a common finding in patients with an implanted cardiac rhythm device and is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Whether oral anticoagulation is effective and safe in this patient population is unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase for randomized trials comparing oral anticoagulation with antiplatelet or no antithrombotic therapy in adults with device-detected atrial fibrillation recorded by a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implanted cardiac monitor. We used random-effects models for meta-analysis and rated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE). The review was preregistered (PROSPERO CRD42023463212). RESULTS: From 785 citations, we identified 2 randomized trials with relevant clinical outcome data: NOAH-AFNET 6 (Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial High Rate Episodes; 2536 participants) evaluated edoxaban, and ARTESiA (Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo-Embolism in Patients With Device-Detected Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation; 4012 participants) evaluated apixaban. Meta-analysis demonstrated that oral anticoagulation with these agents reduced ischemic stroke (relative risk [RR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; high-quality evidence). The results from the 2 trials were consistent (I2 statistic for heterogeneity=0%). Oral anticoagulation also reduced a composite of cardiovascular death, all-cause stroke, peripheral arterial embolism, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73-0.99]; I2=0%; moderate-quality evidence). There was no reduction in cardiovascular death (RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.76-1.17]; I2=0%; moderate-quality evidence) or all-cause mortality (RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.96-1.21]; I2=0%; moderate-quality evidence). Oral anticoagulation increased major bleeding (RR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.05-2.50]; I²=61%; high-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials are consistent with each other. Meta-analysis of these 2 large randomized trials provides high-quality evidence that oral anticoagulation with edoxaban or apixaban reduces the risk of stroke in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation and increases the risk of major bleeding.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Embolism , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Embolism/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Pyridines , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Thiazoles , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
The pro- and antiarrhythmic effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been extensively studied in preclinical and human trials. Despite early evidence of an antiarrhythmic role of n-3 PUFA in the prevention of sudden cardiac death and postoperative and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), subsequent well-designed randomized trials have largely not shown an antiarrhythmic benefit. Two trials that tested moderate and high-dose n-3 PUFA demonstrated a reduction in sudden cardiac death, but these findings have not been widely replicated, and the potential of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) to reduce arrhythmic death in combination, or as monotherapy, remains uncertain. The accumulated clinical evidence does not support supplementation of n-3 PUFA for postoperative AF or secondary prevention of AF. Several large, contemporary, randomized controlled trials of high-dose n-3 PUFA for primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention have demonstrated a small, significant, dose-dependent increased risk of incident AF compared with mineral oil or corn oil comparator. These findings were reproduced with both icosapent ethyl monotherapy and a mixed EPA+DHA formulation. The proarrhythmic mechanism of increased AF in contemporary cohorts exposed to high-dose n-3 PUFA is unknown. EPA and DHA and their metabolites have pleiotropic cardiometabolic and pro- and antiarrhythmic effects, including modification of the lipid raft microenvironment; alteration of cell membrane structure and fluidity; modulation of sodium, potassium, and calcium currents; and regulation of gene transcription, cell proliferation, and inflammation. Further characterization of the complex association between EPA, EPA+DHA, and DHA and AF is needed. Which formulations, dose ranges, and patient subgroups are at highest risk, remain unclear.
Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Fatty Acids, Omega-3 , Humans , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Animals , Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & control , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Docosahexaenoic Acids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether hemorrhagic transformation (HT) modifies the treatment effect of early compared with late initiation of direct oral anticoagulation in people with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unknown. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the ELAN trial (Early Versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-Ischaemic Stroke Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the individual components, 30- and 90-day functional outcome. We estimated outcomes based on HT, subclassified as hemorrhagic infarction (HI) or parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) on prerandomization imaging (core laboratory rating) using adjusted risk differences between treatment arms. RESULTS: Overall, 247 of 1970 participants (12.5%) had HT (114 HI 1, 77 HI 2, 34 PH 1, 22 PH 2). For the primary outcome, the estimated adjusted risk difference (early versus late) was -2.2% (95% CI, -7.8% to 3.5%) in people with HT (HI: -4.7% [95% CI, -10.8% to 1.4%]; PH: 6.1% [95% CI, -8.5% to 20.6%]) and -0.9% (95% CI, -2.6% to 0.8%) in people without HT. Numbers of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were identical in people with and without HT. With early treatment, the estimated adjusted risk difference for poor 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 3-6) was 11.5% (95% CI, -0.8% to 23.8%) in participants with HT (HI: 7.4% [95% CI, -6.4% to 21.2%]; PH: 25.1% [95% CI, 0.2% to 50.0%]) and -2.6% (95% CI, -7.1% to 1.8%) in people without HT. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of major treatment effect heterogeneity or safety concerns with early compared with late direct oral anticoagulation initiation in people with and without HT. However, early direct oral anticoagulation initiation may worsen functional outcomes in people with PH. REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03148457.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Male , Female , Aged , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Intracranial Hemorrhages/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI) and body weight (BW) remain uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data from COMBINE AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation), which pooled patient-level data from the 4 pivotal randomized trials of NOAC versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke or systemic embolic events (stroke/SEE) and major bleeding, respectively; secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke/SEE, intracranial hemorrhage, death, and the net clinical outcome (stroke/SEE, major bleeding, or death). Each outcome was examined across BMI and BW. Because few patients had a BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n=598), the primary analyses were restricted to those with a BMI ≥18.5 kg/m2. RESULTS: Among 58 464 patients, the median BMI was 28.3 (interquartile range, 25.2-32.2) kg/m2, and the median BW was 81.0 (interquartile range, 70.0-94.3) kg. The event probability of stroke/SEE was lower at a higher BMI irrespective of treatment, whereas the probability of major bleeding was lower at a higher BMI with warfarin but relatively unchanged across BMI with NOACs. NOACs reduced stroke/SEE overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73-0.88]; P<0.001), with a generally consistent effect across BMI (Ptrend across HRs, 0.48). NOACs also reduced major bleeding overall (HRadj, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.94]; P<0.001), but with attenuation of the benefit at a higher BMI (trend test across BMI [Ptrend], 0.003). The overall treatment effects of NOACs versus warfarin for secondary outcomes were consistent across BMI, with the exception of the net clinical outcome and death. While these outcomes were overall reduced with NOACs (net clinical outcome, HRadj, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.95]; P<0.001; death, HRadj, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]; P=0.003), these benefits were attenuated at higher BMI (Ptrend, 0.001 and 0.08, respectively). All findings were qualitatively similar when analyzed across BW. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effect of NOACs versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation is generally consistent for stroke/SEE across the spectrum of BMI and BW, whereas the reduction in major bleeding is attenuated in those with higher BMI or BW. Death and the net clinical outcome are overall reduced with NOACs over warfarin, although there remain uncertainties for these outcomes at a very high BMI and BW.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Humans , Warfarin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Body Mass Index , Administration, Oral , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Hemorrhage/complications , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Body Weight , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is associated with increased risk of bleeding and stroke. While left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is approved as an alternative to anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with AF, placement of these devices in patients with severe aortic stenosis, or when performed at the same time as TAVR, has not been extensively studied. METHODS: WATCH-TAVR (WATCHMAN for Patients with AF Undergoing TAVR) was a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of concomitant TAVR and LAAO with WATCHMAN in AF patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to TAVR + LAAO or TAVR + medical therapy. WATCHMAN patients received anticoagulation for 45 days followed by dual antiplatelet therapy until 6 months. Anticoagulation was per treating physician preference for patients randomized to TAVR + medical therapy. The primary noninferiority end point was all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding at 2 years between the 2 strategies. RESULTS: The study enrolled 349 patients (177 TAVR + LAAO and 172 TAVR + medical therapy) between December 2017 and November 2020 at 34 US centers. The mean age of patients was 81 years, and the mean scores for CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol concomitantly) were 4.9 and 3.0, respectively. At baseline, 85.4% of patients were taking anticoagulants and 71.3% patients were on antiplatelet therapy. The cohorts were well-balanced for baseline characteristics. The incremental LAAO procedure time was 38 minutes, and the median contrast volume used for combined procedures was 119 mL versus 70 mL with TAVR alone. At the 24-month follow-up, 82.5% compared with 50.8% of patients were on any antiplatelet therapy, and 13.9% compared with 66.7% of patients were on any anticoagulation therapy in TAVR + LAAO compared with TAVR + medical therapy group, respectively. For the composite primary end point, TAVR + LAAO was noninferior to TAVR + medical therapy (22.7 versus 27.3 events per 100 patient-years for TAVR + LAAO and TAVR + medical therapy, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; Pnoninferiority<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant WATCHMAN LAAO and TAVR is noninferior to TAVR with medical therapy in severe aortic stenosis patients with AF. The increased complexity and risks of the combined procedure should be considered when concomitant LAAO is viewed as an alternative to medical therapy for patients with AF undergoing TAVR. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03173534.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Colchicine is one of the most ancient medications still prescribed. It is extracted from the Colchicum autumnale plant and is routinely used because of its broad anti-inflammatory properties to treat gout and familial Mediterranean fever. Colchicine has shown efficacy in various clinical settings in which inflammation is a key component, and it has become first-line therapy for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Two landmark clinical trials have recently shown that colchicine significantly improves cardiovascular outcomes on background statin and antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease, supporting its role for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. Favorable results have also emerged in atrial fibrillation. We herein briefly review the most recent data related to the multiple cardiovascular conditions for which colchicine has been successfully repurposed.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Coronary Artery Disease , Pericarditis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Colchicine/pharmacology , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Pericarditis/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Testing of factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation has been limited. METHODS: We enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease who had any of the following: a CHA2DS2VASc score of at least 2 (on a scale from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of stroke), a mitral-valve area of no more than 2 cm2, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, or left atrial thrombus. Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard doses of rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular (cardiac or noncardiac) or unknown causes. We hypothesized that rivaroxaban therapy would be noninferior to vitamin K antagonist therapy. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis. RESULTS: Of 4565 enrolled patients, 4531 were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 years, and 72.3% were women. Permanent discontinuation of trial medication was more common with rivaroxaban than with vitamin K antagonist therapy at all visits. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the vitamin K antagonist group had a primary-outcome event. Survival curves were nonproportional. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the vitamin K antagonist group (difference, -76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -31; P<0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the vitamin K antagonist group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, -72 days; 95% CI, -117 to -28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonist therapy led to a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events or death than rivaroxaban therapy, without a higher rate of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer; INVICTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02832544.).
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Rheumatic Heart Disease , Rivaroxaban , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Echocardiography , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rheumatic Heart Disease/complications , Rheumatic Heart Disease/diagnosis , Rheumatic Heart Disease/diagnostic imaging , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Warfarin/adverse effects , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposure-adjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Hypertension , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hypertension/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effectsABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Conen D, Ke Wang M, Popova E, et al; COP-AF Investigators. Effect of colchicine on perioperative atrial fibrillation and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (COP-AF): an international randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;402:1627-1635. 37640035.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Thoracic Surgery , Humans , Colchicine/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & controlABSTRACT
The Ca2+-activated SK4 K+ channel is gated by Ca2+-calmodulin (CaM) and is expressed in immune cells, brain, and heart. A cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the human SK4 K+ channel recently revealed four CaM molecules per channel tetramer, where the apo CaM C-lobe and the holo CaM N-lobe interact with the proximal carboxyl terminus and the linker S4-S5, respectively, to gate the channel. Here, we show that phosphatidylinositol 4-5 bisphosphate (PIP2) potently activates SK4 channels by docking to the boundary of the CaM-binding domain. An allosteric blocker, BA6b9, was designed to act to the CaM-PIP2-binding domain, a previously untargeted region of SK4 channels, at the interface of the proximal carboxyl terminus and the linker S4-S5. Site-directed mutagenesis, molecular docking, and patch-clamp electrophysiology indicate that BA6b9 inhibits SK4 channels by interacting with two specific residues, Arg191 and His192 in the linker S4-S5, not conserved in SK1-SK3 subunits, thereby conferring selectivity and preventing the Ca2+-CaM N-lobe from properly interacting with the channel linker region. Immunohistochemistry of the SK4 channel protein in rat hearts showed a widespread expression in the sarcolemma of atrial myocytes, with a sarcomeric striated Z-band pattern, and a weaker occurrence in the ventricle but a marked incidence at the intercalated discs. BA6b9 significantly prolonged atrial and atrioventricular effective refractory periods in rat isolated hearts and reduced atrial fibrillation induction ex vivo. Our work suggests that inhibition of SK4 K+ channels by targeting drugs to the CaM-PIP2-binding domain provides a promising anti-arrhythmic therapy.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Calmodulin , Intermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels , Potassium Channel Blockers , Animals , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Calcium Signaling , Calmodulin/metabolism , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Humans , Intermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels/antagonists & inhibitors , Intermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels/metabolism , Molecular Docking Simulation , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate , Potassium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , RatsABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: McIntyre WF, Benz AP, Becher N, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation: a study-level meta-analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials. Circulation. 2024;149:981-988. 37952187.
Subject(s)
Aspirin , Atrial Fibrillation , Hemorrhage , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Meta-Analysis as TopicABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Al-Kaisey AM, Parameswaran R, Bryant C, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation vs medical therapy and psychological distress: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330:925-933. 37698564.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Depression/therapy , Depression/psychology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Healey JS, Lopes RD, Granger CB, et al; ARTESIA Investigators. Apixaban for stroke prevention in subclinical atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:107-117. 37952132.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Embolism , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Stroke , Humans , Aspirin/adverse effects , Stroke/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Embolism/prevention & control , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Joosten LP, van Doorn S, van de Ven PM, et al. Safety of switching from a vitamin K antagonist to a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in frail older patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the FRAIL-AF randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2024;149:279-289. 37634130.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Hemorrhage , Vitamin K , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Frail Elderly , Drug Substitution , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frailty , Stroke/prevention & controlABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Kamel H, Longstreth WT Jr, Tirschwell DL, et al; ARCADIA Investigators. Apixaban to prevent recurrence after cryptogenic stroke in patients with atrial cardiopathy: the ARCADIA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:573-581. 38324415.