A phase II study of SB939, a novel pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with translocation-associated recurrent/metastatic sarcomas-NCIC-CTG IND 200†.

BACKGROUND: A subgroup of sarcomas is characterized by defining chromosomal translocations, creating fusion transcription factor oncogenes. Resultant fusion oncoproteins associate with chromatin-modifying complexes containing histone deacetylases (HDAC), and lead to epigenetic transcriptional dysregulation. HDAC inhibitors were shown to be effective in vitro, reversing gene repression by these complexes, restoring PTEN expression and apoptosis via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SB939 is an oral inhibitor of classes 1 and 2 HDAC. Eligible patients with recurrent or metastatic translocation-associated sarcoma (TAS) by local pathology were treated with 60 mg/day every other day for 3 of 4 weeks. Central pathology review was conducted with fusion oncogenes characterized, and HDAC2 expression correlated with efficacy in pre-specified methods. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were treated with a median of 2 cycles. Fourteen patients were assessable for response with confirmed specific chromosomal translocations; 8 had a best response of stable disease (SD) (median duration 5.4 months) with no confirmed objective responses. The 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 49%. Among those with HDAC2 score ≥5, 7/10 had SD, versus 0/3 with HDAC2 score <5. SB939 was considered as well tolerated with <10% patients experienced ≥grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study was stopped prematurely due to prolonged unavailability of SB939. No objective responses were seen. Although the observed SD in HDAC2 high patients was interesting, due to the small sample size, no definitive conclusion can be drawn about the efficacy of SB939 in this patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT01112384.

A therapeutic substitution policy for proton pump inhibitors: clinical and economic consequences.

OBJECTIVE: With the growing need to provide prescription drug benefits to older patients and to contain costs, it will be necessary to direct that coverage so as to make expenditures as efficient as possible. We evaluated the clinical and economic consequences of coverage restriction for 3 leading proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a large-scale natural experiment. METHODS: The study design was a time-trend analysis in the setting of a provincial drug benefits program in British Columbia, Canada. We studied all British Columbia residents aged 66 or older (N = 501,104) using linked data on all prescription drug dispensings, physician services, and hospitalizations between January 2002 and June 2004. The new policy restricted coverage to rabeprazole and required treatment failure with a histamine H2 blocker. More widely used PPIs (omeprazole, pantoprazole, and lansoprazole) had to be paid for out of pocket, unless the physician requested an exemption. The main outcome measures were utilization of PPIs, drug discontinuation rates, gastrointestinal hemorrhage rates, and drug expenditures. RESULTS: Utilization of the restricted PPIs declined sharply after the policy change (-14,850 daily doses per month per 10,000 residents, P < .0001), whereas use of the covered PPI increased sharply (+19,300, P < .0001), with 45% of all PPI users switching to the covered agent within 6 months. We found no increased use of H2 blockers or stopping of gastroprotective drugs. There was no increase in the monthly rate of hospitalization for gastrointestinal hemorrhage after the PPI restriction (P = .35) even though the study had the power to detect increases of 24 events per 10,000 residents with 95% confidence. There was a slight increase in physician visits 3 months after the policy change (P = .01) for a 2-month period when 9% of new rabeprazole users were switched back to a restricted PPI. In the first 6 months of the policy change, the provincial health plan saved at least 2.9 million Canadian dollars as a result of the policy change. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage restriction of 3 leading PPIs led to substantial utilization changes and savings, without increased noncompliance or clinical complication.

Patterns of oral anticoagulants use in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Novel oral anticoagulants are available for the management of atrial fibrillation and are considered more convenient to use than warfarin. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to describe patterns of oral anticoagulant use in the 6 months period following the availability of dabigatran at our hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a single University hospital in the province of Québec, Canada. Medical records of subjects on oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation that were hospitalized between October 1st, 2011 and March 31th, 2012 were reviewed. Type of use (prevalent, incident and switch) and patient's characteristics of warfarin and dabigatran users were compared using Chi-squared and T-tests. RESULTS: In the 6-month period following dabigatran availability in the hospital, 59 patients (13%) were on dabigatran and 388 (87%) on warfarin. Mean CHADS2 score, mean age and mean number of chronic medications were lower in the dabigatran group. The percentage of patients with coronary artery disease was lower and renal function was higher in the dabigatran group. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran use remained low in the first 6 months period following the approval of dabigatran at our hospital, which could be explained by limited data on the efficacy and safety of this agent in subjects with multiple comorbidities.

Use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors in community practice: an explanation for the shortage?

BACKGROUND: Since 2001, one intravenous proton pump inhibitor (pantoprazole) has been available in the United States. A drug shortage bulletin was issued for this agent in 2003. AIM: To evaluate the patterns of use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors (IV PPIs) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of IV PPI use in two community-based teaching hospitals. A computerized pharmacy ordering system was used to identify all patients for whom an IV PPI was ordered. Trained investigators obtained clinical data from patient records and these data were mapped to establish clinical criteria for the use of IV PPIs. RESULTS: Intravenous PPIs were prescribed in 238 patients over a 30-day period and a total of 1,631 doses were prescribed. Primary care providers prescribed 46% of prescriptions. Fifty-six percent of patients who received IV PPIs had no acceptable indication for their use. Of the 126 (81%) patients who were started on PPIs for the first time during their hospital stay, 102 were discharged on a PPI. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous PPIs are widely used for poor indications, which may contribute to the shortage of these agents.