Recognizing bisphosphonate-induced ear osteonecrosis in primary care: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Medication-related ear canal osteonecrosis (MRECO) is a growing concern linked to prolonged anti-resorptive medication use. Despite primary care providers being key prescribers of these medications, there is limited information about MRECO in primary care literature. This article presents a case of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the external auditory canal (EAC), emphasizing the vital role of primary care providers in identifying this rare yet significant side effect of anti-resorptive medication. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 65-year-old female, on long-term alendronic acid for osteoporosis, presented to primary care with a 2-year history of left-sided ear blockage and itchiness. Despite prolonged topical treatment for ear wax, symptoms persisted, leading to an Otolaryngology referral. Microsuction revealed exposed bone in the left EAC. DIAGNOSES, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES: A computed tomography scan confirmed bony erosion of the left EAC, and in the absence of other osteonecrosis risk factors, bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis was diagnosed. Management involved bisphosphonate discontinuation, regular aural toilet, and topical treatment, achieving complete ear canal epithelialisation within 6 months. CONCLUSION: MRECO, a rare complication of anti-resorptive therapy, is anticipated to rise with increasing antiresorptive medication use in the ageing population. Unexplained ear symptoms in those with a history of current or prior anti-resorptive therapy should raise clinical concern, prompting evaluation for exposed bone in the EAC. Raising awareness of MRECO among primary care providers is crucial for early diagnosis and timely management.

Occurrence of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To access the occurrence of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BAONJ) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational studies that evaluated the occurrence of BAONJ in individuals with RA (BAONJ-RA) were considered for inclusion. Electronic searches were performed up to December 2022 in six databases and in the grey literature. The study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists was performed. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Five studies were included three cohort and two cross-sectional. The sample size of subjects with RA ranged from 16 to 3201. Together, the studies presented 36 cases of BAONJ-RA. Prevalence of BAONJ-RA ranged from 0.094% to 56.25%. The incidence ranged from 0.4% to 2.21. Women between the 6th and 8th decade of life were the most affected. Alendronate (n=5) and zoledronic acid (n=9), orally and intravenously, respectively, were the most used bisphosphonates. The duration of bisphosphonates use ranged from 2.7 to 8 years. The certainty of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of BAONJ-RA is low. However, the certainty of the evidence was very low for this outcome.

Survey of the association between tooth extraction and development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients undergoing cancer treatment with bone-modifying agents.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify whether tooth extraction before the administration of bone-modifying agents (BMA) was effective in preventing the onset of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with a history of receiving BMA for cancer treatment. The patients were classified into three groups based on the timing of tooth extraction: no tooth extraction before the onset of MRONJ, tooth extraction before the administration of BMA, and tooth extraction after the administration of BMA. The incidence of MRONJ was compared between the groups. Fisher's exact test and Bonferroni correction were used to test for differences in proportions between the three groups. RESULTS: The total number of subjects was 123. Twenty-four patients (19.5%) developed MRONJ. The incidence rates were 12.3% (10/81), 17.9% (5/28), and 64.3% (9/14) in the non-extraction group, the extraction before BMA administration group, and the extraction after BMA administration group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences between the extraction after BMA administration group and the non-extraction groups and between the extraction after BMA administration group and the extraction before BMA administration group (p < 0.001, p = 0.0049). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence between the non-extraction and the extraction before BMA administration group (p = 0.5274). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth extraction before the administration of BMA is effective in preventing the onset of MRONJ in patients receiving BMA for cancer treatment. Prevention of MRONJ development in patients receiving BMA for cancer treatment contributes to the maintenance of patients' quality of life.

Physicians' awareness of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis.

A serious adverse effect of antiresorptive drugs, which are widely used to treat osteoporosis, is medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Physicians can reduce the risk of MRONJ by educating patients and emphasizing the importance of good oral health. However, limited information is available regarding physicians' awareness and clinical practices associated with MRONJ. Hence, this study aimed to examine physicians' awareness related to MRONJ and associated clinical practices. This study was a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. An online self-administered questionnaire was sent to physicians in Thailand who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis. Most respondents agreed that antiresorptive drugs might cause MRONJ (92.3%), poor oral health increased the risk of MRONJ (84%), and MRONJ is an important consideration in patients with osteoporosis (85%). Of the respondents, 48.1% and 15.5% always referred patients to dentists before and during antiresorptive therapy, respectively. Approximately 60% of physicians informed patients of the MRONJ risk before prescribing antiresorptive drugs, and 30% inquired about patients' oral symptoms at the follow-up visit. Overall, 44% of physicians advised patients to receive oral health care; the most common reason for not advising this was that respondents did not consider themselves to be adequately knowledgeable to detect oral health problems. These findings indicate that while most physicians who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis were aware of and considered MRONJ in their practice, several took insufficient action to prevent it. This highlights the need to emphasize clinical practice guidelines and collaboration between physicians and dentists.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw during long-term prostate cancer management.

Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are extensively used in treating patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases. However, this increases the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The safety of long-term BMA administration in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of MRONJ. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases treated with BMA at our institution since 2008 were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients (15%) had MRONJ during the follow-up period (median, 19 months; interquartile range, 9-43 months). The 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year cumulative MRONJ incidence rates were 18%, 27%, and 61%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified denosumab use as a risk factor for MRONJ, compared with zoledronic acid use (HR 4.64, 95% CI 1.93-11.1). Additionally, BMA use at longer than one-month intervals was associated with a lower risk of MRONJ (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.64). Furthermore, six or more bone metastases (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.13-11.7) and diabetes mellitus (HR 5.07, 95% CI 1.68-15.2) were risk factors for stage 2 or more severe MRONJ. MRONJ should be considered during long-term BMA administration in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

A systematic review assessing occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw following dental procedures

Aim: This study aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the association between dental procedures­such as tooth extractions and periodontal therapy­and occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in individuals using bone-modifying drugs. Methods: Search strategies were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for a timeframe ending in December 2021. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were analyzed independently by two researchers. Three meta-analyses were performed, estimating the crude risk ratio (RR), the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association between tooth extraction and MRONJ. Results: Of the 1,654 studies initially retrieved, 17 were ultimately included. The majority of patients with MRONJ in these studies were female, with a mean age of 64 years. Zoledronic acid was the most commonly used drug among patients with MRONJ, and cancer was the most frequent underlying health condition. Regarding the performed meta-analyses, crude and adjusted analyses demonstrated that tooth extraction increased the risk for MRONJ by 4.28 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.73­10.58), the OR for MRONJ by 26.94 (95%CI: 4.17­174.17), and the HR for MRONJ by 9.96 (95%CI: 4.04­24.55). Conclusion: It was concluded that performing dental procedures, especially tooth extraction, in patients using bone-modifying drugs increased the risk of MRONJ occurrence and, therefore, should be avoided. Further studies, using adjusted data, are warranted

Prevención de osteonecrosis asociada a medicamentos y ensayo clínico multicéntrico, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires / Prevention of drug-related osteonecrosis and multicentric clinical trial, School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires

La osteonecrosis asociada a medicamentos (ONAM) es un efecto adverso poco frecuente pero potencialmente serio que afecta a pacientes que reciben o recibieron tratamiento con drogas antirresortivas o antiangiogénicas. A partir de una revisión narrativa de la literatura, el presente artículo aporta conceptos básicos e información actualizada acerca de incidencia, factores de riesgo y prevención de ONAM desde la perspectiva de la Práctica Basada en la Evidencia. Además pone en conocimiento a la comunidad profesional de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires acerca de las actividades de investigación clínica llevadas a cabo en este área en la Cátedra de Cirugía y Traumatología Buco-Máxilo-Facial I de nuestra casa de estudios (AU)

Medicine related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a rare but potentially serious side effect experienced by patients receiving treatment with antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs. Through a narrative review of the literature, this paper provides basic concepts and updated data about incidence, risk factors and prevention of MRONJ from the Evidence Based Practice perspective. It also informs the professional community of the School of Dentistry of the University of Buenos Aires about the clinical research activities carried out in this area in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery I Department (AU)