Continuous Levodopa Delivery with an Intraoral Micropump System: An Open-Label Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Double-blind studies have demonstrated that motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD) can be reduced with continuous delivery of levodopa. The DopaFuse system is a novel, intraoral micropump that attaches to a retainer and uses a propellant to deliver levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) continuously into the mouth. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of LD/CD delivered via the DopaFuse system compared to treatment with intermittent doses of standard oral LD/CD in PD patients with motor fluctuations. METHODS: This was a 2-week, open-label study (NCT04778176) in 16 PD patients treated with ≥4 levodopa doses/day and experiencing motor fluctuations. On Day 1 (clinic setting) patients received their usual dose of standard LD/CD; DopaFuse therapy was initiated on Day 2, and on Day 3 patients received DopaFuse plus a morning oral LD/CD dose. Patients returned home on Days 4-14 and returned for in-clinic assessment on Day 15. RESULTS: Continuous DopaFuse delivery of LD/CD was associated with reduced variability in plasma levodopa levels compared to oral LD/CD (mean ± SD levodopa Fluctuation Index reduced from 2.15 ± 0.59 on Day1 to 1.50 ± 0.55 on Day 2 (P = 0.0129) and to 1.03 ± 0.53 on Day 3 (P < 0.0001)). This pharmacokinetic improvement translated into significantly reduced OFF time with DopaFuse therapy (reduction of -1.72 ± 0.37 h at Day 15; P = 0.0004) and increased ON time without severe dyskinesias (increase of 1.72 ± 0.37 h at Day 15; P = 0.0004) versus oral LD/CD administration. DopaFuse therapy was not associated with any clinically significant adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous delivery of LD/CD using the DopaFuse system was associated with significantly less variability in plasma levodopa concentrations and reductions in OFF time compared to treatment with standard oral LD/CD therapy and was well tolerated. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Biosensor Strip for Rapid On-site Assessment of Levodopa Pharmacokinetics along with Motor Performance in Parkinson's Disease.

While levodopa (L-Dopa) is the primary treatment for alleviating Parkinson's disease (PD), its efficacy is hindered by challenges such as a short half-life and inconsistent plasma levels. As PD progresses, the rising need for increased and more frequent L-Dopa doses coupled with symptom fluctuations and dyskinesias underscores the urgency for improved comprehension of the interplay between L-Dopa levels and PD motor symptoms. Addressing this critical need, we present a decentralized testing method using a disposable biosensor strip and a universal slope (U-slope) calibration-free approach. This enables reliable, rapid, simple, and cost-effective decentralized L-Dopa measurements from capillary blood. A pilot study with PD persons demonstrates the ability to monitor real-time L-Dopa pharmacokinetics from fingerstick blood after oral L-Dopa-Carbidopa (C-Dopa) tablet administration. Correlating capillary blood L-Dopa levels with PD motor scores revealed a well-defined inverse correlation with temporal motor fluctuations. We compared the resulting dynamic capillary blood L-Dopa levels with plasma L-Dopa levels using the traditional but clinically impractical high-performance liquid chromatography technique. By providing timely feedback on a proper L-Dopa dosing regimen in a decentralized and rapid fashion, this new biosensing platform will facilitate tailored optimal L-Dopa dosing, towards improving symptom management and enhancing health-related quality of life.

Effect of catechin and commercial preparation of green tea essence on the pharmacokinetics of l-dopa in rabbits.

The aim of this study was to investigate drug interactions of L-dopa/carbidopa with catechin and green tea essence in rabbits following the simultaneous administration via an intramuscular injection of catechin or via an intragastric route for green tea essence with L-dopa/carbidopa. The results indicated that catechin at doses of 10, 20 and 50 mg/kg increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ) of L-dopa by about 69, 78 and 42%, respectively. The metabolic ratios of the AUC0-t for 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD)/L-dopa significantly decreased by about 56, 68 and 76% (P < 0.05), respectively. In addition, a single dose of 5/1.25 mg/kg L-dopa/carbidopa was co-administrated with 150 mg/kg green tea essence via an intragastric route with an oral-gastric tube. Comparing the related pharmacokinetic parameters of L-dopa, the clearance and metabolic ratio of L-dopa decreased by 20 and 19% (P < 0.05), respectively. In conclusion, catechin and green tea essence can significantly affect the metabolism of L-dopa by the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) metabolic pathway. Catechin can enhance L-dopa bioavailability, and both catechin and green tea essence decreased 3-OMD formation. Therefore, catechin and green tea essence may increase L-dopa efficacy for Parkinson's disease treatment.

Safety and effectiveness of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for advanced Parkinson's disease: A large single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) can effectively relieve motor and non-motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, adverse events (AEs) are frequent. OBJECTIVE: To describe AEs associated with LCIG treatment and the main reasons for treatment discontinuation. We also looked for factors that were potentially predictive of serious AEs and assessed the effectiveness of and satisfaction with LCIG. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed data on AEs in patients treated with LCIG at a French university medical center. For patients still receiving treatment at last follow-up, effectiveness was assessed according to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and the Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients treated with LCIG for a mean (range) of 19 months (8-47), 57 (90%) experienced at least one AE (340 AEs in total). Most of the AEs (in 69.8% of the patients) were related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal tube (PEG-J) or affected the gastrointestinal tract (granuloma, leakage, or a local infection). Device-related AEs (such as PEG-J removal and device occlusion) were frequent (in 63.5% of patients). Forty-three patients (68%) required at least one additional endoscopic procedure. Dopatherapy-related AEs occurred in 30 patients (48%). Most of the AEs occurred long after treatment initiations, and only a small proportion led to discontinuation. On the CGI scale, 53 patients (84.4%) considered that their condition had improved during LCIG treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite the high frequency of AEs, patients with advanced PD gain clinical benefit from treatment with LCIG. This treatment requires a competent, multidisciplinary team on site.

Continuous versus intermittent oral administration of levodopa in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: A pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory and clinical evidence indicate that continous delivery of levodopa is associated with reduced motor complications compared to standard intermittent levodopa. OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of continuous oral delivery of l-dopa/carbidopa in PD patients with motor fluctuations. METHODS: Eighteen PD patients with motor fluctuations were enrolled in an open-label study comparing pharmacokinetics and efficacy measures between standard intermittent oral l-dopa/carbidopa and "continuous" oral l-dopa/carbidopa. Continuous treatment was operationally defined as sips of an l-dopa dispersion at 5- to 10-minute intervals. On day 1, patients received their usual oral l-dopa/carbidopa doses. On day 2, patients received l-dopa/carbidopa dose by "continuous" oral administration. On day 3, patients received a single dose of oral l-dopa/carbidopa followed by continuous administration of l-dopa/carbidopa. Each study period was 8 hours, and the total l-dopa/carbidopa dose administered was the same on each day. Analyses of variability were primarily-based samples drawn between 4 and 8 hours when subjects were in a relative steady state. RESULTS: There was less variability in plasma l-dopa concentration with continuous versus intermittent oral l-dopa/carbidopa treatment (fluctuation index was 0.99 ± 0.09 vs. 1.38 ± 0.12 [P < 0.001] and coefficient of variation was 0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.49 ± 0.04 [P < 0.001]). Mean OFF time was decreased by 43% (P < 0.001) with continuous oral l-dopa therapy. No safety or tolerability issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous oral delivery of l-dopa/carbidopa was associated with less plasma variability and reduced off time in comparison to standard intermittent oral l-dopa/carbidopa therapy. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and safety of deuterated L-DOPA (SD-1077)/carbidopa compared to L-DOPA/carbidopa following single oral dose administration in healthy subjects.

AIMS: SD-1077, a selectively deuterated precursor of dopamine (DA) structurally related to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), is under development for treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Preclinical models have shown slower metabolism of central deuterated DA. The present study investigated the peripheral pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolism and safety of SD-1077. METHODS: Plasma and urine PK of drug and metabolites and safety after a single oral 150 mg SD-1077 dose were compared to 150 mg L-DOPA, each in combination with 37.5 mg carbidopa (CD) in a double-blind, two-period, crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 16). RESULTS: Geometric least squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of SD-1077 vs. L-DOPA for Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-inf were 88.4 (75.9-103.1), 89.5 (84.1-95.3), and 89.6 (84.2-95.4), respectively. Systemic exposure to DA was significantly higher after SD-1077/CD compared to that after L-DOPA/CD, with GMRs (90% CI) of 1.8 (1.45-2.24; P = 0.0005) and 2.06 (1.68-2.52; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t and a concomitant reduction in the ratio of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid/DA confirming slower metabolic breakdown of DA by monoamine oxidase (MAO). There were increases in systemic exposures to metabolites of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) reaction, 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) with GMRs (90% CI) for SD-1077/CD to L-DOPA/CD for 3-MT exposure of 1.33 (1.14-1.56; P = 0.0077) and 1.66 (1.42-1.93; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t , respectively and GMRs (90% CI) for 3-OMD of 1.19 (1.15, 1.23; P < 0.0001) and 1.31 (1.27, 1.36; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t . SD-1077/CD exhibited comparable tolerability and safety to L-DOPA/CD. CONCLUSIONS: SD-1077/CD demonstrated the potential to prolong exposure to central DA at comparable peripheral PK and safety to the reference L-DOPA/CD combination. A single dose of SD-1077 is safe for further clinical development in Parkinson's disease patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of levodopa/carbidopa microtablets in healthy subjects and Parkinson's disease patients.

OBJECTIVES: Low dose, dispersible, levodopa/carbidopa microtablets with an automatic dose dispenser have been developed to facilitate individualized levodopa treatment. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of levodopa and carbidopa after microtablet administration, and evaluate the impact of potential covariates. METHODS: The population PK analysis involved data from 18 healthy subjects and 18 Parkinson's disease patients included in two single-dose, open-label levodopa/carbidopa microtablet studies. The analysis was carried out using non-linear mixed effects modeling. Bodyweight was included on all disposition parameters according to allometric scaling. Potential influence of additional covariates was investigated using graphical evaluation and adjusted adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. RESULTS: Dispositions of levodopa and carbidopa were best described by a two- and one-compartment model respectively. Double-peak profiles were described using two parallel absorption compartments. Levodopa apparent clearance was found to decrease with increasing carbidopa dose (15% lower with 75 compared to 50 mg of carbidopa) and disease stage (by 18% for Hoehn and Yahr 1 to 4). Carbidopa apparent clearance was found to decrease with age (28% between the age of 60 and 80 years). An external evaluation showed the model to be able to reasonably well predict levodopa concentrations following multiple-dose microtablet administration in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The presented models adequately described the PK of levodopa and carbidopa, following microtablet administration. The developed model may in the future be combined with a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target and used for individualized dose selection, utilizing the flexibility offered by the microtablets.

Delayed O-methylation of l-DOPA in MB-COMT-deficient mice after oral administration of l-DOPA and carbidopa.

1. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is involved in the O-methylation of l-DOPA, dopamine, and other catechols. The enzyme is expressed in two isoforms: soluble (S-COMT), which resides in the cytoplasm, and membrane-bound (MB-COMT), which is anchored to intracellular membranes. 2. To obtain specific information on the functions of COMT isoforms, we studied how a complete MB-COMT deficiency affects the total COMT activity in the body, peripheral l-DOPA levels, and metabolism after l-DOPA (10 mg kg-1) plus carbidopa (30 mg kg-1) administration by gastric tube in wild-type (WT) and MB-COMT-deficient mice. l-DOPA and 3-O-methyl-l-DOPA (3-OMD) levels were assayed in plasma, duodenum, and liver. 3. We showed that the selective lack of MB-COMT did not alter the total COMT activity, COMT enzyme kinetics, l-DOPA levels, or the total O-methylation of l-DOPA but delayed production of 3-OMD in plasma and peripheral tissues.

Carbidopa is an activator of aryl hydrocarbon receptor with potential for cancer therapy.

Carbidopa is used with l-DOPA (l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). PD patients exhibit lower incidence of most cancers including pancreatic cancer, but with the notable exception of melanoma. The decreased cancer incidence is not due to l-DOPA; however, the relevance of Carbidopa to this phenomenon has not been investigated. Here, we tested the hypothesis that Carbidopa, independent of l-DOPA, might elicit an anticancer effect. Carbidopa inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo Based on structural similarity with phenylhydrazine, an inhibitor of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1), we predicted that Carbidopa might also inhibit IDO1, thus providing a molecular basis for its anticancer effect. The inhibitory effect was confirmed using human recombinant IDO1. To demonstrate the inhibition in intact cells, AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) activity was monitored as readout for IDO1-mediated generation of the endogenous AhR agonist kynurenine in pancreatic and liver cancer cells. Surprisingly, Carbidopa did not inhibit but instead potentiated AhR signaling, evident from increased CYP1A1 (cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1), CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 expression. In pancreatic and liver cancer cells, Carbidopa promoted AhR nuclear localization. AhR antagonists blocked Carbidopa-dependent activation of AhR signaling. The inhibitory effect on pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo and the activation of AhR occurred at therapeutic concentrations of Carbidopa. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay further confirmed that Carbidopa promoted AhR binding to its target gene CYP1A1 leading to its induction. We conclude that Carbidopa is an AhR agonist and suppresses pancreatic cancer. Hence, Carbidopa could potentially be re-purposed to treat pancreatic cancer and possibly other cancers as well.

Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel in Parkinson's disease: A randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: The addition of oral entacapone to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel treatment leads to less conversion of levodopa to 3-O-methyldopa, thereby increasing levodopa plasma concentration. The objective of this study was to compare systemic levodopa exposure of the newly developed levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel after a 20% dose reduction with levodopa exposure after the usual levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel dose in a randomized crossover trial in advanced Parkinson's disease patients. METHODS: In this 48-hour study, 11 patients treated with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel were randomized to a treatment sequence. Blood samples were drawn at prespecified times, and patient motor function was assessed according to the treatment response scale. RESULTS: Systemic exposure of levodopa did not differ significantly between treatments (ratio, 1.10 [95% confidence interval, 0.951-1.17]). Treatment response scale scores did not significantly differ between treatments (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel allowed a lower amount of levodopa administration and was well tolerated. Long-term studies are needed to confirm the results. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Continuous Transdermal Delivery of L-DOPA Based on a Self-Assembling Nanomicellar System.

PURPOSE: When levodopa (L-DOPA) is administered orally, it is eliminated from the body very quickly resulting in a series of sharp fluctuations in its blood concentrations. These frequent changes in blood levels are considered to be responsible for the development of late motor complications and dyskinesias, which are troubling clinical and treatment issues in Parkinson's disease. Transdermal drug delivery is a patient-compliant method for delivering therapeutics into the systemic circulation in a continuous and controlled manner. Transdermal delivery of L-DOPA can achieve continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS), thus reducing motor fluctuations. METHODS: However, there are two technical difficulties in the development of a transdermal patch for L-DOPA: (a) L-DOPA is poorly soluble in most pharmaceutically-acceptable solvents, and (b) L-DOPA has a limited permeability through the skin even from saturated solutions. We have, therefore, investigated the transdermal delivery of L-DOPA using an innovative self-assembling nano-micellar system (SANS), loaded with 2% L-DOPA and 1% carbidopa. RESULTS: In vitro testing as well as in vivo pharmacokinetic studies (multiple-dose regimen) in rabbits have demonstrated for the first time a significantly increased percutaneous permeation and systemic absorption of L-DOPA. CONCLUSIONS: It has therefore been proposed that either a once-daily or a twice-daily regimen could be therapeutically effective depending on the severity of the disease.

Outpatient titration of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (Duopa).

Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES; Duopa) is a suspension or gel formulation of carbidopa/levodopa that is approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations. CLES is delivered at a constant rate continuously throughout the day into the jejunum through an infusion pump via a PEG-J tube implanted surgically. The efficacy of CLES was established in the USA based on a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled, parallel group and 12-week study, in which mean daily OFF time was reduced by 4.0 h, compared to 1.9 h with oral immediate release carbidopa/levodopa. The CLES hardware consists of a cassette containing the drug, a pump to deliver the drug and tubing to connect the PEG-J to the pump. It is critical to understand the appropriate conversion of the carbidopa/levodopa daily dosages to the CLES dosage and how to program the pump and titrate CLES to achieve the most effective dose. We describe one methodology for patient selection, outpatient titration and pump programming.

Gastroretentive carbidopa/levodopa, DM-1992, for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to compare efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of DM-1992, an extended-release formulation of carbidopa/levodopa (CD/L-dopa) with immediate-release (IR) CD/L-dopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, crossover study included a 3-d baseline and two 10-d treatment periods. Patients with daily OFF time of 2.5 h or more taking 400 mg or more L-dopa/d in four or more divided doses were titrated to stable regimens of DM-1992 2 times per day or CD/L-dopa IR 3 times to 8 times per day. Patients were allowed to take rescue CD/L-dopa as needed. Using home diaries, patients recorded OFF time and ON time with or without troublesome dyskinesia during baseline and treatment days 7 through 9. During 12-h clinic visits on day 10, plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetics, and motor performance was assessed hourly. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled; mean baseline L-dopa dosage was 968 mg/d. After titration, CD/L-dopa IR was dosed 4.8 times per day and DM-1992, 2 times per day. Rescue CD/L-dopa IR was given 1.3 times during the DM-1992 arm and 0.2 times during the CD/L-dopa IR arm. The reduction from baseline in % OFF time was greater for DM-1992 compared with CD/L-dopa IR (-5.52% vs. +1.33%; P = 0.0471). At steady-state, compared with CD/L-dopa IR, DM-1992 exhibited a smoother plasma L-dopa concentration profile mostly because of a significantly higher (day 10) predose L-dopa concentration, associated with enhanced motor performance. Although more patients taking DM-1992 had one or more adverse events (AEs) than CD/L-dopa IR patients (35% vs. 15%), no pattern to the AEs was seen, nor any resulting discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: DM-1992 was associated with a reduction in %OFF time compared with CD/L-dopa IR despite a reduced dosing frequency. Although the open-label study design and the greater number of rescue doses during the DM-1992 arm call for caution in interpreting the results, the elevated predose plasma L-dopa concentration (12 h after DM-1992 administration) lends objective support to our findings, suggesting that phase 3 studies are warranted.

Double-blind study of the actively transported levodopa prodrug XP21279 in Parkinson's disease.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of XP21279-carbidopa in patients with Parkinson's disease who experience motor fluctuations compared with immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa tablets. XP21279 is a levodopa prodrug that is actively absorbed by high-capacity nutrient transporters expressed throughout the gastrointestinal tract and then rapidly converted to levodopa by carboxylesterases. XP21279-carbidopa sustained-release bilayer tablets were developed to overcome pharmacokinetic limitations of levodopa by providing more continuous exposure. Patients with motor fluctuations who required carbidopa-levodopa four or five times daily were optimized for 2 weeks each on carbidopa-levodopa four or five times daily and XP21279-carbidopa three times daily in a randomized sequence. Next, they received each optimized treatment for 2 weeks in a double-blind/double-dummy, randomized sequence. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in daily off time at the end of each double-blind treatment period. All patients at 2 sites underwent pharmacokinetic analyses. Twenty-eight of 35 enrolled patients completed both double-blind treatments. The mean total daily off time was reduced from baseline by a mean (± standard error) of 2.7 hours (± 0.48 hours) for immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa and 3.0 hours (± 0.57 hours) for XP21279-carbidopa (P = 0.49). Among 11 patients who completed pharmacokinetic sampling on each optimized treatment, the percentage deviation from the mean levodopa concentration was lower (P < 0.05) for XP21279-carbidopa than carbidopa-levodopa. Both treatments had a similar incidence of new or worsening dyskinesias. XP21279-carbidopa administered three times daily produced a reduction in off time similar to that of carbidopa-levodopa administered four or five times daily, and the difference was not statistically significant. XP21279-carbidopa significantly reduced variability in levodopa concentrations compared with carbidopa-levodopa.

Population pharmacokinetics of levodopa in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease: levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion vs. oral tablets.

AIMS: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) provides continuous levodopa-carbidopa delivery through intrajejunal infusion. This study characterized the population pharmacokinetics of levodopa following a 16 h jejunal infusion of LCIG or frequent oral administration of levodopa-carbidopa tablets (LC-oral) in subjects with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: A non-linear mixed-effects model of levodopa pharmacokinetics was developed using serial plasma concentrations from an LCIG phase 1 study and a phase 3 double-blind, double-dummy study of the efficacy and safety of LCIG compared with LC-oral in advanced PD patients (n = 68 for model development; 45 on LCIG and 23 on LC-oral). The final model was internally evaluated using stochastic simulations and bootstrap and externally evaluated using sparse pharmacokinetic data from 311 subjects treated in a long term safety study of LCIG. RESULTS: The final model was a two compartment model with a transit compartment for absorption, first order elimination, bioavailability for LCIG (97%; confidence interval = 95% to 98%) relative to LC-oral, different first order transit absorption rate constants (LCIG = 9.2 h(-1) vs. LC-oral = 2.4 h(-1) ; corresponding mean absorption time of 7 min for LCIG vs. 25 min for LC-oral) and different residual (intra-subject) variability for LCIG (15% proportional error, 0.3 µg ml(-1) additive error) vs. LC-oral (29% proportional error, 0.59 µg ml(-1) additive error). Estimated oral clearance and steady-state volume of distribution for levodopa were 24.8 l h(-1) and 131 l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LCIG administration results in faster absorption, comparable levodopa bioavailability and significantly reduced intra-subject variability in levodopa concentrations relative to LC-oral administration.

A Review of Levodopa Formulations for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Available in the United States.

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of levodopa formulations are evaluated to inform clinical decision making for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Summary: Levodopa is a cornerstone of treatment for Parkinson's disease due to its proven efficacy. Although many patients can initially be managed using immediate release tablets, as their disease progresses they often require escalating doses as well as more frequent dosing to prevent wearing off effects. Additionally, patients who experience time in the off state may struggle with the delay between medication administration and onset of action. Therefore, to increase patient convenience as well as to enhance the pharmacokinetic profile of the levodopa, several other formulations have been developed. Levodopa coformulated with carbidopa is supplied as immediate release tablets, oral disintegrating tablets, controlled release tablets, extended release capsules, and a continuous enteral solution. Additionally, there is a levodopa inhalation powder available. As a result of their different absorption profiles, each formulation has unique safety and efficacy attributes. Consequently, while this expansion of levodopa formulations has substantially increased treatment options for patients, it has also increased the complexity of medical decision making for patients, providers, and health systems alike. Conclusion: Knowledge of the different pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profiles of the available levodopa formulations is critical for the effective management of Parkinson's disease on both the individual patient and population levels.

Metabolite profiling of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in plasma of healthy human participants by LC-HRMS indicates no major differences compared to administration of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel.

Analysis was conducted to compare levodopa/carbidopa pharmacokinetics and drug-related material in plasma of healthy participants after receiving a continuous infusion of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) to a continuous subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa. Study samples were from a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in 20 healthy participants. Participants received either 24-h foslevodopa/foscarbidopa SC infusion to the abdomen or LCIG delivered for 24 h to the jejunum through a nasogastric tube with jejunal extension. Serial blood samples were collected for PK. Comparability of the LD PK parameters between the two treatment regimens was determined. Selected plasma samples were pooled per treatment group and per time point for metabolite profiling. LC-MSn was performed using high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify drug-related material across the dosing regimens and time points. The LD PK parameter central values and 90% confidence intervals following the foslevodopa/foscarbidopa subcutaneous infusion were between 0.8 and 1.25 relative to the LCIG infusion. With LCIG administration, LD, CD, 3-OMD, DHPA, DOPAC, and vanillacetic acid were identified in plasma at early and late time points (0.75 and 24 h); the metabolic profile after administration of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa demonstrated the same drug-related compounds with the exception of the administered foslevodopa. 3-OMD and vanillacetic acid levels increased over time in both treatment regimens. Relative quantification of LC-MS peak areas showed no major differences in the metabolite profiles. These results indicate that neither the addition of monophosphate prodrug moieties nor SC administration affects the circulating metabolite profile of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa compared to LCIG.

Effect of concomitant use of esomeprazole on levodopa pharmacokinetics and clinical symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which inhibit gastric acid secretion, are frequently prescribed to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa, the gold-standard treatment for PD, demonstrates enhanced solubility in acidic environments. Although PPIs increase gastric pH and may affect levodopa absorption, the effect of concomitant PPI use on levodopa pharmacokinetics in patients with PD remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the concomitant use of esomeprazole, a PPI, on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms in patients with PD. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with PD and compared the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms before and two weeks after the concomitant use of esomeprazole. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of levodopa 30 min after concomitant oral administration of levodopa and esomeprazole were significantly lower (4.92 ± 4.10 µmol/L) than those without concomitant esomeprazole use (6.26 ± 3.75 µmol/L; p = 0.027). The plasma concentrations of carbidopa showed no significant differences with respect to concomitant esomeprazole use. Significant elevation was recorded in all subscores of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale scores after concomitant use of esomeprazole. No significant differences were observed between Helicobacter pylori-negative and Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. Non-elderly patients (age ≤ 70 years) tended to be more susceptible to the effect of esomeprazole on levodopa pharmacokinetics and clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The unnecessary use of PPIs should be avoided in patients with PD, especially in non-elderly patients, to improve absorption of levodopa.

Tricompartmental Microcarriers with Controlled Release for Efficient Management of Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson's is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of the nervous system. It has no cure, but its symptoms can be managed by supplying dopamine artificially to the brain.This work aims to engineer tricompartmental polymeric microcarriers by electrohydrodynamic cojetting technique to encapsulate three PD (Parkinson's disease) drugs incorporated with high encapsulation efficiency (∼100%) in a single carrier at a fixed drug ratio of 4:1:8 (Levodopa (LD): Carbidopa(CD): Entacapone (ENT)). Upon oral administration, the drug ratio needs to be maintained during subsequent release from microparticles to enhance the bioavailability of primary drug LD. This presents a notable challenge, as the three drugs vary in their aqueous solubility (LD > CD > ENT). The equilibrium of therapeutic release was achieved using a combination of FDA-approved polymers (PLA, PLGA, PCL, and PEG) and the disc shape of particles. In vitro studies demonstrated the simultaneous release of all the three therapeutics in a sustained and controlled manner. Additionally, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics studies in Parkinson's disease rats induced by rotenone showed a remarkable improvement in PD conditions for the microparticles-fed rats, thereby showing a great promise toward efficient management of PD.

Frequent administration of levodopa/carbidopa microtablets vs levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: An oral dispersible microtablet formulation of levodopa/carbidopa 5/1.25 mg (LC-5) was developed for individualized repeated dosing. The aim was to compare pharmacokinetic profiles of LC-5 and levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, crossover study was carried out in 11 healthy subjects. Plasma concentrations of levodopa, carbidopa and 3-O-methyldopa were determined after intake of 300 mg levodopa during the day, either as three intakes of 100/25/200 mg LCE or as a morning dose of 75/18.25 mg followed by five repeated doses of 45/11.25 mg LC-5. RESULTS: Repeated dosing (2.4-hourly) with LC-5 microtablets compared to LCE (6-hourly) avoided long periods with low plasma levodopa levels. Time to maximum plasma concentrations was significantly shorter for LC-5. LC-5 showed lower fluctuation index (FI) in plasma compared to LCE (ANOVA P = 0.0028). FI for dose 2-5 was on average 1.26 for levodopa in LC-5, and 2.23 for dose 1-2 of LCE. The ratio between the two mean FI:s is 0.565; that is, LC-5 gave nearly half the FI as compared to LCE. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionation of levodopa with LC-5 into small, frequent administrations as compared to standard administrations of LCE decreased the FI in plasma for both levodopa and carbidopa by nearly half.