Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 199, 2022 05 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As we are confronted with more transmissible/severe variants with immune escape and the waning of vaccine efficacy, it is particularly relevant to understand how the social contacts of individuals at greater risk of COVID-19 complications evolved over time. We described time trends in social contacts of individuals according to comorbidity and vaccination status before and during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec, Canada. METHODS: We used data from CONNECT, a repeated cross-sectional population-based survey of social contacts conducted before (2018/2019) and during the pandemic (April 2020 to July 2021). We recruited non-institutionalized adults from Quebec, Canada, by random digit dialling. We used a self-administered web-based questionnaire to measure the number of social contacts of participants (two-way conversation at a distance ≤2 m or a physical contact, irrespective of masking). We compared the mean number of contacts/day according to the comorbidity status of participants (pre-existing medical conditions with symptoms/medication in the past 12 months) and 1-dose vaccination status during the third wave. All analyses were performed using weighted generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and robust variance. RESULTS: A total of 1441 and 5185 participants with and without comorbidities, respectively, were included in the analyses. Contacts significantly decreased from a mean of 6.1 (95%CI 4.9-7.3) before the pandemic to 3.2 (95%CI 2.5-3.9) during the first wave among individuals with comorbidities and from 8.1 (95%CI 7.3-9.0) to 2.7 (95%CI 2.2-3.2) among individuals without comorbidities. Individuals with comorbidities maintained fewer contacts than those without comorbidities in the second wave, with a significant difference before the Christmas 2020/2021 holidays (2.9 (95%CI 2.5-3.2) vs 3.9 (95%CI 3.5-4.3); P<0.001). During the third wave, contacts were similar for individuals with (4.1, 95%CI 3.4-4.7) and without comorbidities (4.5, 95%CI 4.1-4.9; P=0.27). This could be partly explained by individuals with comorbidities vaccinated with their first dose who increased their contacts to the level of those without comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: It will be important to closely monitor COVID-19-related outcomes and social contacts by comorbidity and vaccination status to inform targeted or population-based interventions (e.g., booster doses of the vaccine).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Contact Tracing , Vaccination Coverage , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Behavior , Time Factors , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/trends , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/trends
2.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 17(3): e1008688, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33690626

ABSTRACT

Outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 are threatening the health care systems of several countries around the world. The initial control of SARS-CoV-2 epidemics relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing, teleworking, mouth masks and contact tracing. However, as pre-symptomatic transmission remains an important driver of the epidemic, contact tracing efforts struggle to fully control SARS-CoV-2 epidemics. Therefore, in this work, we investigate to what extent the use of universal testing, i.e., an approach in which we screen the entire population, can be utilized to mitigate this epidemic. To this end, we rely on PCR test pooling of individuals that belong to the same households, to allow for a universal testing procedure that is feasible with the limited testing capacity. We evaluate two isolation strategies: on the one hand pool isolation, where we isolate all individuals that belong to a positive PCR test pool, and on the other hand individual isolation, where we determine which of the individuals that belong to the positive PCR pool are positive, through an additional testing step. We evaluate this universal testing approach in the STRIDE individual-based epidemiological model in the context of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic. As the organisation of universal testing will be challenging, we discuss the different aspects related to sample extraction and PCR testing, to demonstrate the feasibility of universal testing when a decentralized testing approach is used. We show through simulation, that weekly universal testing is able to control the epidemic, even when many of the contact reductions are relieved. Finally, our model shows that the use of universal testing in combination with stringent contact reductions could be considered as a strategy to eradicate the virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Epidemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Belgium/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/trends , Computational Biology , Computer Simulation , Contact Tracing/methods , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , False Negative Reactions , Family Characteristics , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/trends , Models, Statistical , Quarantine/methods , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Quarantine/trends , Travel
3.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 40, 2021 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are used to reduce transmission of SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, empirical evidence of the effectiveness of specific NPIs has been inconsistent. We assessed the effectiveness of NPIs around internal containment and closure, international travel restrictions, economic measures, and health system actions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in 130 countries and territories. METHODS: We used panel (longitudinal) regression to estimate the effectiveness of 13 categories of NPIs in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission using data from January to June 2020. First, we examined the temporal association between NPIs using hierarchical cluster analyses. We then regressed the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) of COVID-19 against different NPIs. We examined different model specifications to account for the temporal lag between NPIs and changes in Rt, levels of NPI intensity, time-varying changes in NPI effect, and variable selection criteria. Results were interpreted taking into account both the range of model specifications and temporal clustering of NPIs. RESULTS: There was strong evidence for an association between two NPIs (school closure, internal movement restrictions) and reduced Rt. Another three NPIs (workplace closure, income support, and debt/contract relief) had strong evidence of effectiveness when ignoring their level of intensity, while two NPIs (public events cancellation, restriction on gatherings) had strong evidence of their effectiveness only when evaluating their implementation at maximum capacity (e.g. restrictions on 1000+ people gathering were not effective, restrictions on < 10 people gathering were). Evidence about the effectiveness of the remaining NPIs (stay-at-home requirements, public information campaigns, public transport closure, international travel controls, testing, contact tracing) was inconsistent and inconclusive. We found temporal clustering between many of the NPIs. Effect sizes varied depending on whether or not we included data after peak NPI intensity. CONCLUSION: Understanding the impact that specific NPIs have had on SARS-CoV-2 transmission is complicated by temporal clustering, time-dependent variation in effects, and differences in NPI intensity. However, the effectiveness of school closure and internal movement restrictions appears robust across different model specifications, with some evidence that other NPIs may also be effective under particular conditions. This provides empirical evidence for the potential effectiveness of many, although not all, actions policy-makers are taking to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Contact Tracing/trends , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/trends , Schools/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , Contact Tracing/methods , Humans , Pandemics , Quarantine/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
4.
Am J Public Health ; 111(5): 937-948, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734840

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To examine how sociodemographic, political, religious, and civic characteristics; trust in science; and fixed versus fluid worldview were associated with evolving public support for social distancing, indoor mask wearing, and contact tracing to control the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods. Surveys were conducted with a nationally representative cohort of US adults in April, July, and November 2020.Results. Support for social distancing among US adults dropped from 89% in April to 79% in July, but then remained stable in November 2020 at 78%. In July and November, more than three quarters of respondents supported mask wearing and nearly as many supported contact tracing. In regression-adjusted models, support differences for social distancing, mask wearing, and contact tracing were most pronounced by age, partisanship, and trust in science. Having a more fluid worldview independently predicted higher support for contact tracing.Conclusions. Ongoing resistance to nonpharmaceutical public health responses among key subgroups challenge transmission control.Public Health Implications. Developing persuasive communication efforts targeting young adults, political conservatives, and those distrusting science should be a critical priority.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Contact Tracing , Masks/trends , Physical Distancing , Public Health/trends , Adult , Aged , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Politics , Science , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
BMC Med ; 18(1): 321, 2020 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032601

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After experiencing a sharp growth in COVID-19 cases early in the pandemic, South Korea rapidly controlled transmission while implementing less stringent national social distancing measures than countries in Europe and the USA. This has led to substantial interest in their "test, trace, isolate" strategy. However, it is important to understand the epidemiological peculiarities of South Korea's outbreak and characterise their response before attempting to emulate these measures elsewhere. METHODS: We systematically extracted numbers of suspected cases tested, PCR-confirmed cases, deaths, isolated confirmed cases, and numbers of confirmed cases with an identified epidemiological link from publicly available data. We estimated the time-varying reproduction number, Rt, using an established Bayesian framework, and reviewed the package of interventions implemented by South Korea using our extracted data, plus published literature and government sources. RESULTS: We estimated that after the initial rapid growth in cases, Rt dropped below one in early April before increasing to a maximum of 1.94 (95%CrI, 1.64-2.27) in May following outbreaks in Seoul Metropolitan Region. By mid-June, Rt was back below one where it remained until the end of our study (July 13th). Despite less stringent "lockdown" measures, strong social distancing measures were implemented in high-incidence areas and studies measured a considerable national decrease in movement in late February. Testing the capacity was swiftly increased, and protocols were in place to isolate suspected and confirmed cases quickly; however, we could not estimate the delay to isolation using our data. Accounting for just 10% of cases, individual case-based contact tracing picked up a relatively minor proportion of total cases, with cluster investigations accounting for 66%. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst early adoption of testing and contact tracing is likely to be important for South Korea's successful outbreak control, other factors including regional implementation of strong social distancing measures likely also contributed. The high volume of testing and the low number of deaths suggest that South Korea experienced a small epidemic relative to other countries. Caution is needed in attempting to replicate the South Korean response in populations with larger more geographically widespread epidemics where finding, testing, and isolating cases that are linked to clusters may be more difficult.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Contact Tracing/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Quarantine/methods , Bayes Theorem , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Contact Tracing/trends , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Quarantine/trends , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(6): 341-5, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27200517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given its potential for reducing the proportion of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) unaware of their diagnosis, partner notification for HIV has been underutilized. This study aimed to determine if the implementation of opt-out referral of men who have sex with men, newly diagnosed with HIV, to partner notification officers (PNO) increased the proportion of sexual partners notified. METHODS: In April 2013, all individuals newly diagnosed with HIV at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia were referred to Department of Health PNO to facilitate partner notification. The number of sexual partners reported by men and the proportion contacted in the 12 months before (opt-in period) and after (opt-out period) this policy change were determined through review of the clinical PNO records. RESULTS: Overall, 111 men were diagnosed with HIV during the study period. Compared with men in the opt-in period (n = 51), men in the opt-out period (n = 60) were significantly more likely to accept assistance from the PNO (12 [24%] vs 51 [85%]; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of reported partners were notified with opt-out referral (85/185, 45.9%; 95% confidence interval, 38.6-53.4) compared with opt-in referral (31/252, 12.3%; 95% confidence interval, 8.5-17.0) (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Opt-out referral to PNO was associated with a substantially higher proportion of partners at risk of HIV being contacted.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/trends , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Australia , HIV Infections/transmission , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Referral and Consultation , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Partners , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Young Adult
8.
Sex Transm Dis ; 41(10): 631-6, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25211262

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of recent sex partners named by persons with sexually transmitted infections are not notified about their exposure despite attempts by public health officials. Although text messaging (texting) and Internet-based communications (dating Web sites, e-mail, etc) are used by a large segment of the public for regular communications, these tools have been underused for partner services (PS). METHODS: We augmented PS for HIV in New York City using texting and Internet-based means to contact persons for whom traditional information (landline telephone number, postal address) was unavailable. We compared traditional PS (traditionalPS), Internet-based PS (IPS) in January 2011 to October 2012, and texting PS (txtPS) from January 2012 (when txtPS was initiated) through October 2012 on outcomes of contact attempts, notification, and HIV testing. RESULTS: From January 2011 to October 2012, of 3319 partners elicited, 2604 and 275 partners had traditional and only Internet-based contact information and were selected for traditionalPS and IPS, respectively. From January to October 2012, 368 of 1569 partners had only texting-enabled cellphone numbers and were selected for txtPS. The contact rate for txtPS (285/368 [77%]) was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the contact rates for traditionalPS (1803/2604 [69%]) and IPS (112/275 [41%]). There was a higher likelihood of notifying contacted IPS (odds ratio, 2.1; 1.2-3.4) and txtPS (odds ratio, 2.4; 1.7-3.2) than traditionalPS partners (P ≤ 0.0001). However, among the notified partners, traditionalPS partners were significantly (P < 0.0001) more likely than txtPS or IPS partners to test for HIV after partner notification (69% vs 45% and 34%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting traditionalPS with txtPS and IPS enabled notification of hundreds of previously untraceable partners and several new HIV diagnoses.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Electronic Mail , HIV Seropositivity/transmission , Sexual Partners , Social Media , Text Messaging , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Public Health
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 41(11): 671-3, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25299414

ABSTRACT

Public health usually notifies partners of STD exposure in-person despite availability of other options. We examined trends in in-person versus telephone notification for HIV 3 years after the introduction of a telephone option. Most notifications were made by telephone. Partners notified doubled; however, the proportion HIV testing declined slightly.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/trends , HIV Seropositivity/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Public Health , Sexual Partners/psychology , Telephone , Videoconferencing , Adult , Female , HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Patient Preference , Truth Disclosure
10.
Sex Transm Dis ; 40(12): 909-14, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24220349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Partner services (PSs) are a long-standing component of HIV control programs in the United States and some parts of Europe. Small randomized trials suggest that HIV PS can be effective in identifying persons with undiagnosed HIV infection. However, the scalability and effectiveness of HIV PS in low-income countries are unknown. METHODS: We used data collected from 2009 to 2010 through a large HIV PS program in Cameroon to evaluate HIV PS in a developing country. HIV-positive index cases diagnosed in antenatal care, voluntary counseling and testing, and inpatient facilities were interviewed to collect information on their sexual partners. Partners were contacted via telephone or home visit to notify, test, and enroll those found to be HIV positive in medical care. RESULTS: Health advisors interviewed 1462 persons with HIV infection during the evaluation period; these persons provided information about 1607 sexual partners. Health advisors notified 1347 (83.8%) of these partners, of whom 900 (66.8%) were HIV tested. Of partners tested, 451 (50.1%) were HIV positive, of whom 386 (85.6%) enrolled into HIV medical care. An average 3.2 index cases needed to be interviewed to identify 1 HIV case. CONCLUSIONS: HIV PS can be successfully implemented in a developing country and is highly effective in identifying persons with HIV infection and linking them to care.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , HIV Infections/transmission , Sexual Partners , Adolescent , Adult , Cameroon/epidemiology , Contact Tracing/methods , Contact Tracing/trends , Counseling , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Referral and Consultation
11.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep ; 10(2): 134-41, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23526423

ABSTRACT

New approaches to expanding HIV testing and effective treatment and the wider availability of rapid testing technology have created new opportunities for achieving national and global HIV testing goals. In spite of HIV testing expansion in many settings, growing evidence of the prevention benefits of HIV testing, and the development of new, cost-effective approaches to HIV testing service provision, formidable obstacles to HIV testing expansion persist. Inequitable testing coverage exists within and across countries. While the proportion of people with HIV aware of their status is about 80% in the U.S., the majority of HIV-infected persons in Africa are unaware of their status. Testing of most-at-risk populations, couples, children, and adolescents pose still unresolved policy and programmatic challenges. Future directions for HIV testing include rapid testing technology and detection of acute HIV infection, self-testing expansion, and partner notification. Expanded routine HIV screening and widespread testing is a public health imperative to reach national and international HIV prevention and treatment goals.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Mass Screening , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Africa/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Contact Tracing/economics , Contact Tracing/trends , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/trends , Public Health , United States/epidemiology
12.
Med J Aust ; 198(4): 210-4, 2013 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23451966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine increased notifications of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in men who have sex with men (MSM) infected with HIV in Victoria, and evaluate HCV transmission risk factors other than injecting drug use. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Case series through retrospective review of all HCV cases in Victoria from 1 April 2010 to 30 June 2011, with clinical and laboratory data examined in likely MSM to identify a co-infected cohort. Patients with newly acquired HCV with HIV co-infection were invited to complete a questionnaire exploring novel risk factors for HCV transmission (non-injecting drug use, sexual practices with increased likelihood of trauma, and presence of genital ulcers). Sequencing was performed to determine the local molecular epidemiology of HCV co-infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics of newly co-infected MSM, traditional versus novel risk factors for HCV acquisition, prior knowledge of potential for sexual transmission of HCV, and association between viral sequences. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with HIV were identified from 3365 notifications of hepatitis C. The median age was 42 years, and median time from HIV to HCV diagnosis was 22 months. Most patients were asymptomatic, with abnormal liver function tests prompting HCV testing. Interviews with 14 patients identified a high prevalence of novel risk factors and limited knowledge of HCV risk. Two clusters of matching viral sequences were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Novel HCV transmission routes have emerged in Victoria. These data reinforce the need for targeted testing and prevention strategies among HIV-infected MSM.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/transmission , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Asymptomatic Diseases/epidemiology , Australia/epidemiology , Base Sequence , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , Genotype , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Liver Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Euro Surveill ; 17(42)2012 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23098824

ABSTRACT

On 7 January 2011, a six year-old child living in a Roma community near Seville, southern Spain, was hospitalised with measles. Contact tracing identified a probable index case with onset of symptoms on 20 December 2011 and several unreported cases among children under the age of 15 years in the same town. The outbreak initially spread in districts in the city of Seville with a high proportion of Roma residents, and later to other cities and towns in Andalusia. While some towns experienced wide spread of the disease with significant clusters of cases, most of the affected locations saw non-clustered cases or very few secondary cases. The outbreak resulted in 1,759 confirmed or probable cases of which 393 (19%) required hospitalisation. Measles virus of genotype D4 was diagnosed in more than half of the cases. Significant differences (p<0.0001) by age group were found between clustered and non-clustered cases. The highest proportion of clustered cases occurred in the age group of 5-14 yearolds, while the highest proportion of non-clustered cases was seen in those older than 29 years. The last confirmed case related to this outbreak was reported on 20 August 2011.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Immunization Programs , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles virus , Measles/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Contact Tracing/trends , Disease Notification , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Health Personnel/standards , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Immunization Programs/standards , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/prevention & control , Measles virus/immunology , Measles virus/isolation & purification , Measles virus/pathogenicity , Medically Underserved Area , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sentinel Surveillance , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Spain/epidemiology , Workforce
14.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ; 376(1829): 20200276, 2021 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053268

ABSTRACT

In the absence of a vaccine, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission has been controlled by preventing person-to-person interactions via social distancing measures. In order to re-open parts of society, policy-makers need to consider how combinations of measures will affect transmission and understand the trade-offs between them. We use age-specific social contact data, together with epidemiological data, to quantify the components of the COVID-19 reproduction number. We estimate the impact of social distancing policies on the reproduction number by turning contacts on and off based on context and age. We focus on the impact of re-opening schools against a background of wider social distancing measures. We demonstrate that pre-collected social contact data can be used to provide a time-varying estimate of the reproduction number (R). We find that following lockdown (when R= 0.7, 95% CI 0.6, 0.8), opening primary schools has a modest impact on transmission (R = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97) as long as other social interactions are not increased. Opening secondary and primary schools is predicted to have a larger impact (R = 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.53). Contact tracing and COVID security can be used to mitigate the impact of increased social mixing to some extent; however, social distancing measures are still required to control transmission. Our approach has been widely used by policy-makers to project the impact of social distancing measures and assess the trade-offs between them. Effective social distancing, contact tracing and COVID security are required if all age groups are to return to school while controlling transmission. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Models, Theoretical , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Disease Control/trends , Contact Tracing/trends , Humans , Physical Distancing , United Kingdom/epidemiology
15.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0244537, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33406102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The unprecedented worldwide social distancing response to COVID-19 resulted in a quick reversal of escalating case numbers. Recently, local governments globally have begun to relax social distancing regulations. Using the situation in Manitoba, Canada as an example, we estimated the impact that social distancing relaxation may have on the pandemic. METHODS: We fit a mathematical model to empirically estimated numbers of people infected, recovered, and died from COVID-19 in Manitoba. We then explored the impact of social distancing relaxation on: (a) time until near elimination of COVID-19 (< one case per million), (b) time until peak prevalence, (c) proportion of the population infected within one year, (d) peak prevalence, and (e) deaths within one year. RESULTS: Assuming a closed population, near elimination of COVID-19 in Manitoba could have been achieved in 4-6 months (by July or August) if there were no relaxation of social distancing. Relaxing to 15% of pre-COVID effective contacts may extend the local epidemic for more than two years (median 2.1). Relaxation to 50% of pre-COVID effective contacts may result in a peak prevalence of 31-38% of the population, within 3-4 months of initial relaxation. CONCLUSION: Slight relaxation of social distancing may immensely impact the pandemic duration and expected peak prevalence. Only holding the course with respect to social distancing may have resulted in near elimination before Fall of 2020; relaxing social distancing to 15% of pre-COVID-19 contacts will flatten the epidemic curve but greatly extend the duration of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/methods , Canada/epidemiology , Contact Tracing/methods , Contact Tracing/trends , Humans , Manitoba/epidemiology , Models, Theoretical , Pandemics/prevention & control , Quarantine/psychology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity
16.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ; 376(1829): 20200279, 2021 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053254

ABSTRACT

England has been heavily affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with severe 'lockdown' mitigation measures now gradually being lifted. The real-time pandemic monitoring presented here has contributed to the evidence informing this pandemic management throughout the first wave. Estimates on the 10 May showed lockdown had reduced transmission by 75%, the reproduction number falling from 2.6 to 0.61. This regionally varying impact was largest in London with a reduction of 81% (95% credible interval: 77-84%). Reproduction numbers have since then slowly increased, and on 19 June the probability of the epidemic growing was greater than 5% in two regions, South West and London. By this date, an estimated 8% of the population had been infected, with a higher proportion in London (17%). The infection-to-fatality ratio is 1.1% (0.9-1.4%) overall but 17% (14-22%) among the over-75s. This ongoing work continues to be key to quantifying any widespread resurgence, should accrued immunity and effective contact tracing be insufficient to preclude a second wave. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Models, Statistical , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Basic Reproduction Number/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Disease Control/trends , Contact Tracing/trends , England/epidemiology , Forecasting , Humans , London/epidemiology
17.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0250435, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010333

ABSTRACT

We study the effects of two mechanisms which increase the efficacy of contact-tracing applications (CTAs) such as the mobile phone contact-tracing applications that have been used during the COVID-19 epidemic. The first mechanism is the introduction of user referrals. We compare four scenarios for the uptake of CTAs-(1) the p% of individuals that use the CTA are chosen randomly, (2) a smaller initial set of randomly-chosen users each refer a contact to use the CTA, achieving p% in total, (3) a small initial set of randomly-chosen users each refer around half of their contacts to use the CTA, achieving p% in total, and (4) for comparison, an idealised scenario in which the p% of the population that uses the CTA is the p% with the most contacts. Using agent-based epidemiological models incorporating a geometric space, we find that, even when the uptake percentage p% is small, CTAs are an effective tool for mitigating the spread of the epidemic in all scenarios. Moreover, user referrals significantly improve efficacy. In addition, it turns out that user referrals reduce the quarantine load. The second mechanism for increasing the efficacy of CTAs is tuning the severity of quarantine measures. Our modelling shows that using CTAs with mild quarantine measures is effective in reducing the maximum hospital load and the number of people who become ill, but leads to a relatively high quarantine load, which may cause economic disruption. Fortunately, under stricter quarantine measures, the advantages are maintained but the quarantine load is reduced. Our models incorporate geometric inhomogeneous random graphs to study the effects of the presence of super-spreaders and of the absence of long-distant contacts (e.g., through travel restrictions) on our conclusions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Contact Tracing/methods , SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/transmission , Contact Tracing/trends , Epidemiologic Methods , Humans , Mobile Applications , Models, Statistical , Pandemics , Quarantine/psychology , Referral and Consultation , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
18.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 7(1): e25701, 2021 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33326411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Digital proximity tracing apps have been released to mitigate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus known to cause COVID-19. However, it remains unclear how the acceptance and uptake of these apps can be improved. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the coverage of the SwissCovid app and the reasons for its nonuse in Switzerland during a period of increasing incidence of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: We collected data between September 28 and October 8, 2020, via a nationwide online panel survey (COVID-19 Social Monitor, N=1511). We examined sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with app use by using multivariable logistic regression, whereas reasons for app nonuse were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 46.5% (703/1511) of the survey participants reported they used the SwissCovid app, which was an increase from 43.9% (662/1508) reported in the previous study wave conducted in July 2020. A higher monthly household income (ie, income >CHF 10,000 or >US $11,000 vs income ≤CHF 6000 or

Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Contact Tracing/instrumentation , Mobile Applications/standards , Physical Distancing , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/transmission , Contact Tracing/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland
19.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 32(4): 461-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20462949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contact investigation is a logical approach to intensified case finding in China. However, currently there are no written national guidelines. The aim of this study is to review the published literature that describes the procedures followed by local level and report the yield for active tuberculosis (TB) cases. METHODS: Studies conducted in China and published between 1997 and 2007 on contact investigation were searched. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the review. There was no standard definition of contact and no study provided details on how to prioritize contacts. Investigation methods vary between each study. The number of contacts investigated per index case ranged from 22.7 to 658 in congregate settings and from 1.5 to 5.8 in household. The yields for active TB ranged from 0 to 11.765% in congregate settings and from 0 to 6.897% in household. The weighted yields for smear-positive index and smear-negative index were 1 and 0.2% respectively in household and 0.5% for pulmonary case index in congregate settings. CONCLUSION: There is considerable heterogeneity amongst the methods used and the cases yielded in these studies, and in general the quality of contact investigation is low; therefore, there is a need for China to develop national guidelines on contact investigation.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/methods , Mycobacterium/isolation & purification , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Contact Tracing/trends , Humans , Mass Screening , Tuberculosis/transmission
20.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 14(6): 1631-1636, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32892060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With no approved vaccines for treating COVID-19 as of August 2020, many health systems and governments rely on contact tracing as one of the prevention and containment methods. However, there have been instances when the infected person forgets his/her contact-persons and does not have their contact details. Therefore, this study aimed at analyzing possible opportunities and challenges of integrating emerging technologies into COVID-19 contact tracing. METHODS: The study applied literature search from Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE and WHO COVID-19 reports and guidelines analyzed. RESULTS: While the integration of technology-based contact tracing applications to combat COVID-19 and break transmission chains promise to yield better results, these technologies face challenges such as technical limitations, dealing with asymptomatic individuals, lack of supporting ICT infrastructure and electronic health policy, socio-economic inequalities, deactivation of mobile devices' WIFI, GPS services, interoperability and standardization issues, security risks, privacy issues, political and structural responses, ethical and legal risks, consent and voluntariness, abuse of contact tracing apps, and discrimination. CONCLUSION: Integrating emerging technologies into COVID-19 contact tracing is seen as a viable option that policymakers, health practitioners and IT technocrats need to seriously consider in mitigating the spread of coronavirus. Further research is also required on how best to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the utilisation of emerging technologies in contact tracing while observing the security and privacy of people in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Contact Tracing/trends , Artificial Intelligence/trends , Biomedical Technology/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Contact Tracing/methods , Geographic Information Systems/trends , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL