Ultrasonic assessment of gastric solid contents in patients undergoing upper endoscope with sedation.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative reflux aspiration presents a grave concern during sedation or general anesthesia, particularly when solid gastric contents prompt acute upper respiratory obstruction, potentially resulting in fatal consequences for patients. Currently, there are limited means for promptly assessing solid gastric contents in clinical settings. Therefore, this study examined the efficacy of ultrasound assessment for solid gastric contents, offering a rapid and non-invasive approach for early detection and decision-making regarding interventions. METHODS: The study included 400 patients scheduled for upper endoscopy procedures, which encompassed both gastroscope and gastroscope combined colonoscopy examinations with sedation. Ultrasound scanning of the antrum was performed while patients were positioned semi-sitting or in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) posture. The evaluation of solid gastric contents relied on direct visual observation during endoscopy. Gastric volume measurement occurred subsequent to endoscopic suction of gastric contents. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonography in discerning solid contents. RESULT: Seven patients undergoing gastroscope with sedation were found to have solid gastric contents. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the ultrasound qualitative evaluation of solid contents were 85.7%, 99%, 60%, and 99.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Solid stomach contents can be evaluated qualitatively with reasonable accuracy using ultrasonography. Additionally, in patients undergoing upper endoscopy and assessed to have solid gastric contents with ultrasound, administration of mild sedation is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100048994); registered 19/07/2021.

The use of point of care gastric ultrasound and anesthesia management in pediatric patients with preoperative fasting non-adherence scheduled for elective surgical procedures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Failure to adhere to perioperative fasting requirements increases aspiration risk and can lead to delay or cancellation of surgery. Point of care gastric ultrasound may guide decision-making to delay, cancel or proceed with surgery. METHODS: This study aimed to describe gastric contents using point of care gastric ultrasound in pediatric patients with known fasting guideline violations presenting for elective surgery. This was a single-center retrospectivechart review of gastric ultrasound scans in patients presenting for elective surgeries with "nothing by mouth" violation (per fasting guidelines) or unclear fasting status. The primary outcome is description of gastric contents using point of care ultrasound. The ultrasound findings were classified as low-risk for aspiration (empty, clear fluid < 1.5 ml/kg), high-risk (solids, clear fluid > 1.5 ml/kg), or inconclusive study. Gastric ultrasound findings were communicated to the attending anesthesiologist. For patients proceeding without delay the estimated time saved was defined as the difference between ultrasound scan time and presumed case start time based on American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 106 patients with a median age of 4.8 years. There were 31 patients (29.2%) that had ultrasound finding of high-risk gastric contents. These patients had cases that were delayed, cancelled or proceeded with rapid sequence intubation. Sixty-six patients (62.3%) were determined to be low-risk gastric contents and proceeded with surgery without delay. For these patients, a median of 2.6 h was saved. No aspiration events were recorded for any patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to use preoperative point of care gastric ultrasound to determine stomach contents and risk-stratify pediatric patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with fasting non-adherence. Preoperative gastric ultrasound may have a role in determining changes in anesthetic management in this patient population.

An observational study of gastric contents in pediatric patients with long bone fracture using gastric ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: The retention of gastric contents at surgery presentation is a risk factor for perioperative aspiration. A preoperative fasting (nil per os; NPO) interval is widely used to reduce this risk, but this approach is based on assumptions about the prevalence of typical gastric emptying rates. We assessed NPO guidelines' reliability with ultrasound (US) imaging and suction in pediatric patients presenting for single long-bone fracture repair after appropriate NPO intervals, when nearly all should have had empty stomachs. AIMS AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional observational study comprised 200 pediatric surgical patients. As their NPO times varied by food/drink type, we defined "weighted NPO units" as the lowest multiple of elapsed recommended NPO times between consumption and surgery for each type of food or drink. We used US to image the stomach and its contents before anesthesia induction, followed by gastric suction. We evaluated the relationships between weighted NPO units, US gastric contents grade, opioid analgesic dosage and timing, and suctioned volume. RESULTS: Despite meeting typical NPO standards (median 14 h fasting), many patients retained nontrivial quantities of gastric contents at surgery. Weighted NPO units did not exhibit statistically-significant relationships with either suctioned volume or US grade. However, suctioned volume did correspond well to US grade. CONCLUSION: NPO status may be a less reliable predictor of gastric contents at anesthesia induction in this patient population than has been assumed. Bedside US screening appears to provide more useful information for the planning of airway management.

Evaluation of the 'Sip Til Send' regimen before elective caesarean delivery using bedside gastric ultrasound: A paired cohort pragmatic study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative fasting is routinely advocated to avoid pulmonary aspiration. The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) recommends a fasting period of 2 h for liquids before surgery. Liberal drinking policies such as the 'Sip Til Send' are a suggested alternative to maintain hydration before surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare residual gastric volumes in fully fasted nonlabouring parturients before elective caesarean delivery with the 'Sip Til Send' with water liberal drinking protocol. Our hypothesis was the 'Sip Til Send' would be noninferior to standard fasting at minimising the residual gastric volume immediately before surgery. DESIGN: A paired cohort prospective observational pragmatic study using gastric ultrasound, analysed by an operator blinded to the fasting status of each scan. SETTING: A tertiary maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland. The study was conducted between January and June 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women about to undergo elective caesarean delivery who had followed ESAIC fasting guidelines before admission. INTERVENTIONS: Each participant underwent two pairs (semi-recumbent and the semi-recumbent right lateral positions) of standardised ultrasound examinations of the gastric antrum: the order of these scans was randomised. The first pair of scans occurred on admission before the 'Sip Til Send' protocol commenced, the other pair just before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, after a variable time following the 'Sip Til Send' protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the difference in antral cross-sectional area (CSA) between the fully fasted women on admission and the same women after following the 'Sip Til Send' protocol until just before spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: Fifty-eight women were randomised for the study: 55 and 54 scans in the semi-recumbent position on admission, and 55 and 54 scans in the right lateral position just before spinal anaesthesia. The mean differences (95% CI) in CSA in the semi-recumbent and RL positions were 0.07 (-0.39 to 0.53) cm 2 and 0.04 (-0.60 to 0.68) cm 2 , respectively. Since the of 95% CIs did not cross the predefined noninferiority margin of 0.88 cm 2 , 'Sip Til Send' was noninferior to fully fasting in in terms of the antral CSA. CONCLUSION: The 'Sip Til Send' protocol of liberal hydration with water was noninferior to standard fasting prior to elective caesarean delivery. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT05783427 ClinicalTrials.gov.

Determining residual gastric volume in healthy children using ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Fasting guidelines for children recommend restricting clear fluids for one or two hours before a procedure to reduce pulmonary aspiration. Gastric volumes < 1.5 mL·kg-1 do not seem to present an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration. Our aim was to quantify the time to achieve a gastric volume < 1.5 mL·kg-1 after clear fluid ingestion in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in healthy volunteers aged 1-14 yr. Participants followed American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines prior to data collection. Gastric ultrasound (US) was performed in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) position to determine the antral cross-sectional area (CSA). Following baseline measurements, participants consumed 250 mL of a clear fluid. We then performed gastric US at four time intervals: 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Data were collected following a predictive model for gastric volume estimation using the formula: volume (mL) = -7.8 + (3.5 × RLD CSA) + (0.127) × age (months). RESULTS: We recruited 33 healthy children aged 2-14 yr. The mean gastric volume per weight (mL·kg-1) at baseline was 0.51 mL·kg-1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.57). The mean gastric volume was 1.55 mL·kg-1 (95% CI, 1.36 to 1.75) at 30 min, 1.17 mL·kg-1 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) at 60 min, 0.76 mL·kg-1 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.85) at 90 min, and 0.58 mL·kg-1 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.65) at 120 min. CONCLUSION: Our results show that total gastric fluid volume was < 1.5 mL·kg-1 after 60 min, suggesting that current fasting guidelines for children could be liberalized.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les directives de jeûne pour les enfants recommandent de restreindre les liquides clairs pendant une ou deux heures avant une intervention pour réduire l'aspiration pulmonaire. Des volumes gastriques < 1,5 mL·kg−1 ne semblent pas présenter un risque accru d'aspiration pulmonaire. Notre objectif était de quantifier le temps nécessaire pour atteindre un volume gastrique < 1,5 mL·kg−1 après ingestion de liquides clairs chez les enfants. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude observationnelle prospective chez des volontaires en bonne santé âgé·es de 1 à 14 ans. Les participant·es ont suivi les directives de jeûne de l'American Society of Anesthesiologists avant la collecte de données. L'échographie gastrique a été réalisée en décubitus latéral droit (DLD) pour déterminer la section transversale antrale. Après les mesures initiales, les participant·es ont consommé 250 mL d'un liquide clair. Nous avons ensuite réalisé une échographie gastrique à quatre intervalles de temps : 30, 60, 90 et 120 minutes. Les données ont été recueillies selon un modèle prédictif pour l'estimation du volume gastrique à l'aide de la formule : volume (mL) = −7,8 + (3,5 × section transversale antrale en DLD) + (0,127) × âge (mois). RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 33 enfants en bonne santé âgé·es de 2 à 14 ans. Le volume gastrique moyen par poids (mL·kg−1) au début de l'intervention était de 0,51 mL·kg−1 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,46 à 0,57). Le volume gastrique moyen était de 1,55 mL·kg−1 (IC 95 %, 1,36 à 1,75) à 30 min, 1,17 mL·kg−1 (IC 95 %, 1,01 à 1,33) à 60 min, 0,76 mL·kg−1 (IC 95 %, 0,67 à 0,85) à 90 min, et 0,58 mL·kg−1 (IC 95 %, 0,52 à 0,65) à 120 min. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats montrent que le volume total de liquide gastrique était < 1,5 mL·kg−1 après 60 min, suggérant que les directives actuelles de jeûne pour les enfants pourraient être libéralisées.

Ultrasound assessment of gastric contents in children before general anaesthesia for acute appendicitis.

There is increasing evidence that a minority of adults with acute appendicitis have gastric contents, posing an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of children with acute appendicitis who have gastric contents considered to pose a higher risk of pulmonary aspiration. We analysed point-of-care gastric ultrasound data routinely collected in children before emergency appendicectomy in a specialist paediatric hospital over a 30-month period. Based on qualitative and quantitative antral assessment in the supine and right lateral decubitus positions, gastric contents were classified as 'higher-risk' (clear liquid with calculated gastric fluid volume > 0.8 ml.kg-1 , thick liquid or solid) or 'lower-risk' of pulmonary aspiration. The 115 children studied had a mean (SD) age of 11 (3) years; 37 (32%; 95%CI: 24-42%) presented with higher-risk gastric contents, including 15 (13%; 95%CI: 8-21%) with solid/thick liquid contents. Gastric contents could not be determined in 13 children as ultrasound examination was not feasible in the right lateral decubitus position. No cases of pulmonary aspiration occurred. This study shows that gastric ultrasound is feasible in children before emergency appendicectomy. This technique showed a range of gastric content measurements, which could contribute towards defining the risk of pulmonary aspiration.

Ultrasonographic assessment of preoperative gastric volume in patients with dyspepsia: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing gastroenteroscopy during sedation are prone to aspiration, and most patients with dyspepsia have delayed gastric emptying. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of measuring the gastric antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) to supply a novel clinical diagnostic reference value in patients with dyspepsia. METHODS: Patients with dyspepsia undergoing elective gastroscopy were included. The Perlas qualitative 0-2 grading scale score was determined before the operation. The anteroposterior diameter (D1) and craniocaudal diameter (D2) between gastric antrum serosal surfaces were measured perpendicular to each other in the supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions. CSA values in the supine position and RLD position were determined. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned with the volumes measured and noted as actual gastric volume. Multiple regression analysis was used to fit a mathematical model for estimating the gastric volume. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the accuracy of RLD CSA to detect gastric volumes of > 0.8 ml/kg. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were enrolled and divided into a functional dyspepsia (FD) group and an organic dyspepsia group according to gastroscopy findings. For a gastric volume of > 0.8 ml/kg, cut-off values for FD and organic dyspepsia were 6.7 cm2 and 10.0 cm2, respectively. Two new modified mathematical models were derived to predict an estimated gastric volume for FD and organic dyspepsia: volume = 3.93 × RLD CSA - 0.47 × age; and volume = 6.15 × RLD CSA - 0.61 × age. CONCLUSION: We used the cut-off value of the antral area for the fast diagnosis of gastric volumes in patients with dyspepsia, which may assist clinicians in identifying patients at risk of aspiration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn ( CHICTR-DDD-17010871 ); registered 15 March 2017.

Prevalence of risk stomach in laboring women allowed to unrestrictive oral intake: a comparative cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Although restricting food intake during labor is recommended by guidelines, intrapartum starvation has not been popular in some regions. We conducted this comparative cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of risk stomach in non-fasted laboring women compared with fasted non-laboring women using gastric ultrasound. METHODS: Ultrasound examination of the antrum was performed in 50 term fasted non-laboring women before elective cesarean delivery and 50 laboring women allowed to eat and drink during active labor. Examinations consisted of the qualitative (antral grades, 0-3) and quantitative evaluation (antral cross-sectional area and calculated gastric volume) in the supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) position. A risk stomach was defined as an antral grade ≥ 2 or grade 1 with gastric volume ≥ 1.5 ml· kg- 1. RESULTS: No non-laboring women had grade ≥ 2, while 34 (68%) laboring women had grade ≥ 2. Nine (18%) non-laboring and 40 (80%) laboring women presented risk stomach (P < 0.001) (risk ratio: 4.4, 95% CI 2.4-8.2). Compared with non-laboring women, laboring women had larger antral area at "empty" stomach (grade 0) (437 mm2 vs.350 mm2 in supine, 571 mm2 vs.480 mm2 in RLD, P < 0.05) and cut-off values of antral area to discriminate a risk stomach (510 mm2 vs. 453 mm2 in supine, 670 mm2 vs. 605 mm2 in RLD). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a higher prevalence of risk stomach presents in laboring women under a liberal eating policy, gastric ultrasound is therefore useful for this risk population if general anesthesia is required unexpectedly.

Qualitative and quantitative gastric ultrasound assessment in highly skilled regional anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspiration is a major complication in anesthesia, and various studies have shown that gastric sonography can reliably provide valuable information relative to both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of gastric content. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasound assessment of gastric content compared between two novice anesthesiologist gastric sonographers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study of two anesthesiologists learning to perform qualitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content on healthy volunteers was conducted at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (reg. no. NCT04760106). RESULTS: Of the 50 enrolled participants, three were excluded due to study protocol violation. Each anesthesiologist performed a qualitative assessment on 47 participants for an overall total of 94 scans. There were 15 males and 32 females (age 42 ± 11.7 years, weight 61.2 ± 13.1 kg, height 160.7 ± 7.3 cm, and BMI 23.6 ± 4.3 kg/m2). The overall success rate for all gastric content categories was approximately 96%. From antral cross-sectional area measurement, as the ingested volume increased, there was a tendency toward increased deviation from the actual ingested volume. Interrater agreement between anesthesiologists was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A larger fluid volume was found to be associated with a lower level of agreement between the two anesthesiologists. The ICCs were 0.706 (95% CI: -0.125 to 0.931), 0.669 (95% CI: -0.254 to 0.920), 0.362 (95% CI: -0.498 to 0.807) for the 100 ml, 200 ml, and 300 ml fluid volumes, respectively. The mean duration to perform an ultrasound examination for each gastric content category and for the entire examination did not differ significantly between anesthesiologists (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content is highly accurate and can be easily learned. In contrast, quantification of gastric volume by novice gastric sonographers is more complex and requires more training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04760106 Date registered on Feb 11, 2021. Prospectively registered.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastric Content in Pediatric Emergency Department Procedural Sedation Patients.

OBJECTIVES: There is debate regarding the timing of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in relation to fasting status. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) provides the ability to measure gastric content and is being used as a surrogate for aspiration risk in anesthesia. We sought to evaluate the gastric content of pediatric emergency department (PED) patients undergoing PSA using POCUS. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study using a convenience sample of pediatric patients undergoing PSA between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Following a brief history, gastric content was measured using POCUS in both supine and right lateral decubitus positions at 2-hour intervals until the time of PSA. Qualitative content and calculated volume were classified based on the Perlas Model of anesthesia "Risk" assessment. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were enrolled with 61.3% male and mean age of 6.5 years. Gastric content was determined in 92 patients. There were 79.3% that had "high risk" content at the time of PSA, with a median fasting time of 6.25 hours and no serious adverse events. Fasting duration had a weak to moderate ability to predict "risk" category (area under the curve = 0.73), with no patient (n = 17) who underwent multiple evaluations awaiting PSA progressing from "high" to "low risk." CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PED patients undergoing PSA at our institution had "high risk" gastric content with no clinically significant change occurring during serial evaluations. This calls into question the utility of delaying PSA based upon fasting status and lends support to a more comprehensive risk-benefit approach when planning pediatric PSA.

Evaluation of gastric contents using ultrasound in full-term pregnant women fasted for 8 h: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the gastric volume and contents after an 8-h fasting period in full-term, non-laboring, pregnant women following a standardized meal. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we included full-term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. The participants were instructed to fast after a standardized meal (apple juice, bread, and cheese). Participants were scanned in the semi-recumbent and right-lateral positions 8 h after the standardized meal. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with gastric volume > 1.5 mL kg-1 calculated by two equations. Secondary outcomes included the antral cross-sectional area and gastric volume. Data are expressed as frequency (%, 95% confidence interval [CI]), mean ± standard deviation (95% CI of the mean), or median (quartiles) as appropriate. RESULTS: Forty-one women were available for the final analysis. For the primary outcome, one participant (2.4%, 95% CI of 0.06 to 12.8%) had gastric volume > 1.5 mL kg-1, and none had solids in the antrum. For the secondary outcomes, the mean (95% CI of the mean) of the antral cross-sectional area was 2.11 ± 0.72 (1.88 to 2.34) cm2 and 4.08 ± 1.80 (3.51 to 4.65) cm2 during the semi-recumbent and right-lateral position, respectively. The median (quartiles) gastric volume was 0.53 (0.32, 0.66) mL kg-1 and 0.33 (0.13, 0.52) mL kg-1 as estimated by Perlas et al. and Roukhomovsky et al. equations, respectively. CONCLUSION: After 8-h fasting following a standardized meal, full-term pregnant non-laboring women are less likely to have a high residual gastric volume.

Prediction of gastric fluid volume by ultrasonography in infants undergoing general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasonography can estimate gastric contents and volume to assess the risk of pulmonary aspiration; however, its use in infants has not been well validated. We aimed to develop a predictive model for estimating gastric fluid volume using ultrasonography in infants. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 200 infants (≤12 months) undergoing general anaesthesia. After anaesthetic induction, while preserving spontaneous respiration, we measured gastric antral cross-sectional area using ultrasonography in both the supine and right lateral decubitus positions. We then suctioned the gastric content and measured its volume. The primary outcome was development of a gastric fluid volume prediction model with multiple regression analysis. Agreement between the predicted volume and the suctioned volume was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: Overall, 192 infants were included in the final analysis. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the gastric antral cross-sectional area in the supine (P<0.001; correlation coefficient: 0.667) and right lateral decubitus (P<0.001; correlation coefficient: 0.845) positions and qualitative antral grade (P<0.001; correlation coefficient: 0.581) correlated with suctioned volume. We developed a predictive model: predicted volume (ml)=-3.7+6.5 × (right lateral decubitus cross-sectional area [cm2])-3.9 (supine cross-sectional area [cm2])+1.7 × grade (P<0.01). When comparing the predicted volume and suctioned volume, the mean bias was 0.01 ml kg-1 and the limit of agreement was -0.58 to 0.62 ml kg-1. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric fluid volume can be estimated using a predictive model based on ultrasonography data in infants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03155776.

Gastric content and perioperative pulmonary aspiration in patients with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Gastric emptying may be delayed in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the incidence of full stomach in fasting patients with DM and their risk of pulmonary aspiration under anaesthesia is not well understood. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken to map the literature on aspiration risk in DM. A search was conducted in seven bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE and Embase, for original articles that studied aspiration risk, gastric emptying, or gastric content and volume. Selection and characterisation were performed by two independent reviewers using a predefined protocol registered externally. RESULTS: The search identified 5063 unique records, and 16 studies (totalling 775 patients with DM) were selected: nine studied gastric emptying and seven studied gastric content or volume. There were no studies reporting the incidence of aspiration in subjects with DM. All nine studies reported delayed emptying in patients with DM compared with healthy controls. Amongst the seven studies that compared gastric residual content/volume (GRV) in the perioperative period, five reported clinically negligible GRV in both patients with DM and controls, whereas two observed a higher incidence of 'full' stomach in patients with DM. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence concerning the aspiration risk for surgical patients with DM is based on a limited number of studies, mostly unblinded, reporting physiological data on gastric emptying and gastric volume as surrogate markers of aspiration risk. Data on fasting gastric content and volume in patients with DM are limited and contradictory; hence, the true risk of aspiration in fasting patients with DM is unknown.

A comparison of gastric gas volumes measured by computed tomography after high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or conventional facemask ventilation.

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy is increasingly used to improve peri-intubation oxygenation. However, it is unknown whether it may cause or exacerbate insufflation of gas into the stomach. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy is now standard practice in our hospital for adult patients undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation of liver cancer under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. We compared gastric gas volumes measured from computed tomography images that had been acquired immediately after intubation in two series of patients: 50 received peri-intubation high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and another 50 received conventional facemask pre-oxygenation and ventilation before intubation and before high-flow nasal oxygen therapy became standard practice in our unit. Median (IQR [range]) gastric gas volume was 24.0 (14.2-59.9 [3-167]) cm3 in the high-flow nasal oxygen therapy group and 23.8 (12.6-38.8 [0-185]) cm3 in the facemask group. There was no difference between the two groups in the volume of gastric gas measured by computed tomography imaging (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 1136, p = 0.432, n1  = n2  = 50). Our results demonstrate that a small volume of gastric gas is commonly present after induction of anaesthesia, but that the use of peri-intubation high-flow nasal oxygen therapy for pre-oxygenation and during apnoea does not increase this volume compared with conventional facemask pre-oxygenation and ventilation. This is clinically relevant, as high-flow nasal oxygen therapy is increasingly being used in a peri-intubation context and in patients at higher risk of aspiration.

Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting by point-of-care gastric ultrasound: can we improve complications and length of stay in emergency surgery? A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative ileus are common after major digestive surgery and represent one of the significant problems in Acute Care Surgery. The delivery model of emergency surgery needs to be improved in order to foster a patient-centered care. The multimodal approach suggested by Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Guidelines is gaining widespread acceptance but is difficult to apply to emergency surgery. Ultrasound examination of the gastric antrum allows a reliable assessment of gastric contents and volume and might help contribute to improve perioperative care in the emergency setting. METHODS: Gastric ultrasound examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively on forty-one patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, in order to estimate the gastric volume. The data obtained were used to evaluate a possible relationship between delayed gastric emptying and postoperative adverse event. RESULTS: Gastric antrum detection rate varied from 31.8% in open up to 78.9% in laparoscopic surgeries (p = 0.003). Six patients experienced adverse outcomes, had an antiemetic therapy administered and/or a nasogastric tube inserted. Mean CSA was significantly higher in this group (12.95 cm2 vs 6.12 cm2; p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of gastric ultrasound varies depending on surgical technique. A dilated gastric antrum is significantly related to postoperative adverse outcomes and a careful ultrasound follow-up might help tailor postoperative nutrition and antiemetic therapy. In patients who experienced adverse events, antral CSA showed an average increase of more than 50% over a period of 72 h after surgery. A relative measure could be used to predict the risk of postoperative ileus. Overall, gastric ultrasound seems to be a promising diagnostic tool and a useful way to integrate ERAS® protocol in emergency abdominal surgery.

Ultrasound assessment of gastric volumes of thick fluids: Validating a prediction model.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is essential in the treatment of critically ill patients. Current methods to monitor enteral nutrition such as aspiration of residual volume may be inaccurate. Gastric ultrasonography estimates total gastric fluid volume using the Perlas model, but this model is validated for clear fluids only, and its accuracy for measuring thick fluids is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the Perlas model for gastric volume estimation of enteral nutrition, a thick fluid product. DESIGN: A single-centre, single blinded, randomised controlled study. SETTING: Single university hospital, from May to July 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two healthy fasted volunteers were randomly allocated to different fluid volume groups. INTERVENTION: Participants randomly ingested predetermined volumes between 50 and 400 ml of a feeding-drink (Nutricia Nutridrink). Following a standardised gastric ultrasound scanning protocol, a blinded sonographer measured the antral cross-sectional area in the supine and right-lateral decubitus positions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurements were performed at baseline, 5 min postingestion and 20 min postingestion. Gastric volumes were predicted using the previously established Perlas model and compared with total gastric fluid volumes after ingestion of the study drink. RESULTS: The Perlas model underestimated the volume of thick gastric fluid and yielded a suboptimal fit for our data. However, antral cross-sectional area and total gastric thick fluid volumes were significantly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.73, P < 0.01). A new model was fitted to predict gastric volumes of thick fluids, using the antral cross-sectional area (cm2) in the right-lateral decubitus position: Volume (ml) = 79.38 + 13.32 x right-lateral cross-sectional area. CONCLUSION: The Perlas model for clear gastric fluid volume estimation is suboptimal for thick fluid volume assessment and an alternative model is presented. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register Trial NL7677, Registration date: 16 April 2019; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7677.

Does Point-of-Care Gastric Ultrasound Correlate With Reported Fasting Time?

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, patient-reported fasting time has been the primary objective presedation measure of aspiration risk. Recently, gastric ultrasound has been used to assess gastric volume for the determination of aspiration risk in patients undergoing anesthesia in the operative setting. We sought to determine the correlation of gastric volume estimated by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to reported fasting time. METHODS: We included children 4 to 18 years of age who presented with an acute traumatic injury. Enrolled children underwent POCUS to calculate gastric volume, which was calculated using a validated formula: Volume (mL) = -7.8 + (3.5 × Cross-sectional Area [CSA]) + (0.127 × Age in months). The CSA was measured (CSA = (anterior-posterior diameter × craniocaudal diameter × π)/4). We analyzed the relationship between time since last reported oral intake and measured gastric volume using Spearman rank correlation (ρ). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients with a median age of 10.5 years (interquartile range, 7.3-13.7 years) were enrolled. The gastric antrum was identified and measured in 88 (85%) patients; air obstructing the posterior surface of the gastric antrum prevented measurement in 14 of the 15 remaining patients. We observed a weak inverse correlation between fasting time (either liquid or solid) and estimated gastric volume (ρ = -0.33), with no significant difference based on type of intake (solids, ρ = 0.28; liquids, ρ = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Gastric volume can be estimated by POCUS and is not strongly correlated with fasting time in children in the emergency department setting.

Does ultrasonographic assessment of gastric antrum correlate with gastric residual volume in critically ill patients? A prospective observational study.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between ultrasonographic gastric antral measurements and aspirated gastric residual volume (GRV) in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN). This prospective observational study included 56 enterally-fed critically ill patients in one-year period. All imaging procedures were done at 30-degree head-of-bed elevation and supine position on epigastric region of abdomen with 2.5-6 MHz convex-array probe just before routine GRV aspiration. The antral cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated by measuring the anteroposterior (dAP) and craniocaudal diameters (dCC) of the gastric antrum. Total 283 ultrasonographic gastric antrum imaging procedures were done. In only eight (2.82%) attempts, the antrum could not be visualized due to inhibition from intra-gastric air or gas in the surrounding intestinal lumen. The calculated mean antral CSA was 568.15 ± 348.37 mm2 (103.43-2,846.30). The antral CSA correlated significantly with aspirated GRV, and the antral CSA increased linearly with increasing aspirated GRV (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.0001). In Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of antral CSA ≥ 920 mm2 (mean + 1*SD) for estimating aspirated GRV, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.848 (95% CI, 0.76 ~ 0.93) (p < 0.0001), and ROC analysis of antral CSA to discriminate aspirated GRV ≥ 250 mL showed a significant relation (AUC = 0.969, 95% CI 0.94 ~ 0.99, p < 0.0001). Ultrasonographic measurement of gastric antral CSA is an easy and reliable bedside procedure to estimate GRV in critically ill patients receiving EN in 30-degree head-of-bed elevation and supine position. Trial registration number: NCT04413474, date of registration: June 17, 2020, retrospectively registered.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of gastric emptying after ingesting carbohydrate-rich drink in young children: A randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: A recent consensus statement in Europe has suggested that the fasting time for clear liquid in children can be shortened to 1 hour before a surgery. However, the study to show that 1-hour fasting time for clear fluids is safe in young children is still lacking. This study aimed to investigate the gastric emptying time for carbohydrate-rich drink and regular 5% glucose solution in children aged 3-7 years. METHODS: After overnight fasting, individuals were randomly assigned to ingest 5 mL kg-1 of either carbohydrate-rich drink or 5% glucose solution. One week later, the same subjects were asked to ingest the other one. Ultrasonography was performed to examine the gastric contents. Gastric antral cross-sectional area was measured, and the gastric fluid volume was calculated before and after fluid ingestion within 120 minutes. The primary outcome was the gastric emptying time for both the clear fluids calculated using the antral cross-sectional area and logarithms of gastric fluid volume. The degrees of thirst and hunger of two drinks were evaluated using a visual analogue scale as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 16 individuals were analyzed. In the glucose solution group, the antral cross-sectional area and logarithms of gastric fluid volume returned to baseline at 30 minutes after ingestion. However, in the carbohydrate-rich drink group, the median [interquartile range; range] antral cross-sectional area (3.69 [2.64-5.15; 1.83-8.93] cm2 vs 2.41 [2.10-2.96; 1.81-4.37] cm2 , P < .001) and mean (95% confidence interval) logarithms of gastric fluid volume (2.54 [2.30-2.79] mL vs 2.12 [1.94-2.30] mL, P = .048) were still higher than at 60 minutes and returned to the baseline values at 90 minutes after ingestion, respectively. The degree of thirst was lower in the glucose solution group than that in the carbohydrate-rich drink group. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric emptying of carbohydrate-rich drink is slower than that of 5% glucose solution but the residual gastric fluid volume is low one hour after ingestion of 5 mL kg-1 of either fluid.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastric Content.

Gastric ultrasound (US) is a growing modality within the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) field. It provides the ability to directly measure an individual patient's gastric content and has potential use as both a clinical and a research tool. Here, we review the historical development of current gastric US models and their clinical application within the field of general anesthesia, describe the US findings and technique for using POCUS to assess gastric content, and discuss the current and potential applications of gastric POCUS within the emergency department.