Comparison of Danaparoid Sodium and Synthetic Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Associated with Hematological Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Danaparoid sodium and synthetic protease inhibitors (SPIs) have been approved for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in Japan. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical results of the treatment of DIC with danaparoid or SPIs. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 188 patients with hematological malignancy-related DIC. RESULTS: DIC resolution rate in the danaparoid group was higher than that in the SPIs group (61.5 vs. 42.6%; p = 0.031) on day 7. Multivariate analysis identified the response to chemotherapy as independent predictive factor for DIC resolution on day 7 (odds ratio, OR, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.21-4.31; p = 0.011). While there was no significant difference in the DIC resolution rate on day 14 (75.0 vs. 62.4%; p = 0.117), in a subgroup analysis of patients who did not show an improvement in the underlying disease, the danaparoid group showed a significantly better DIC resolution rate (OR 3.89; 95% CI 1.15-13.2; p = 0.030). There was no difference in the rate of cumulative mortality from bleeding within 28 days between the 2 groups (6.6 vs. 3.3%; p = 0.278). CONCLUSIONS: Danaparoid may be associated with more frequent resolution of DIC in patients with refractory underlying disease.

Danaparoid is effective and safe for patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate whether danaparoid is effective in improving the live birth rate in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (oAPS).Methods: This prospective study included 91 pregnancies of 60 patients with oAPS diagnosed according to criteria of the International Congress on APS. Live birth rates, adverse pregnancies and perinatal outcomes were compared among patients treated with danaparoid and low dose aspirin (danaparoid group, LDA), unfractionated heparin (UFH) and LDA (UFH group) and LDA and/or prednisolone (LDA group).Results: After excluding 11 miscarriages with abnormal embryonic chromosomes, one chemical pregnancy and one ectopic pregnancy, live birth rates were 87.5% (14/16) for the danaparoid group, 90.0% (36/40) for the UFH group and 63.6% (14/22) for the LDA group, respectively. The live birth rates of patients treated with danaparoid and UFH were similar and tended to be higher than that of patients treated with LDA, respectively (OR 4.0, 95% confidence interval 0.72-22.22 and 5.15, 1.33-20.00). No patient given danaparoid and one patient with UFH developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia which resulted in a stillbirth. Another patient with UFH suffered a lumbar compression fracture.Conclusion: Danaparoid is effective for improving the live birth rate and is safe for patients with oAPS.

α-1 antitrysin DAMPens GVHD.

In this issue of Blood, Brennan et al report that a noninfectious damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), heparan sulfate (HS),(1) aggravates graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and that this enhanced severity can be dampened by administration of serine protease inhibitor α-1 antitrysin (AAT).(2)

Heparan sulfate, an endogenous TLR4 agonist, promotes acute GVHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the most common cause of nonrelapse-related morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although T-cell depletion and intensive immunosuppression are effective in the control of GVHD, they are often associated with higher rates of infection and tumor recurrence. In this study, we showed that heparan sulfate (HS), an extracellular matrix component, can activate Toll-like receptor 4 on dendritic cells in vitro, leading to the enhancement of dendritic cell maturation and alloreactive T-cell responses. We further demonstrated in vivo that serum HS levels were acutely elevated at the onset of clinical GVHD in mice after allo-HSCT. Treatment with the serine protease inhibitor α1-antitrypsin decreased serum levels of HS, leading to a reduction in alloreactive T-cell responses and GVHD severity. Conversely, an HS mimetic that increased serum HS levels accelerated GVHD. In addition, in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies, serum HS levels were elevated and correlated with the severity of GVHD. These results identify a critical role for HS in promoting acute GVHD after allo-HSCT, and they suggest that modulation of HS release may have therapeutic potential for the control of clinical GVHD.

Aggravation of acute pancreatitis by heparan sulfate in mice.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is responsible for pancreatitis-associated mortality, but its initiating events are poorly understood. Possible candidates may be endogenous substances, which have previously been shown to mediate inflammatory responses. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SIRS could be exaggerated by heparan sulfate (HS) in acute pancreatitis (AP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: AP was induced in mice by cerulein injection and HS was administered one hour after the final cerulein injection. The severity of pancreatitis was assessed by serum amylase activity, pancreatic edema, and pancreatic myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. Systemic inflammation was evaluated by assessing lung injury and by measuring serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6. Cytokine levels were also measured in pancreas and lung tissues. RESULTS: HS did not worsen the pancreatic injury induced by cerulein. In contrast, HS exacerbated the systemic inflammation as measured by augmented lung MPO activity, increased lung TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels, and elevated serum IL-6 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a potential role for HS in propagating pancreatic inflammation from a local process to a systemic response and thus suggest the possibility that blockade of HS might improve the outcome of SIRS in AP.

Management of allergy to heparins in postoperative care: subcutaneous allergy and intravenous tolerance.

Itching erythematous or eczematous plaques around injection sites are quite frequent side effects of heparin treatment and are clinical symptoms of a delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins. In most cases, changing the subcutaneous therapy from unfractionated to low molecular weight heparin or treatment with heparinoids does not provide improvement, due to extensive cross-reactivity. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that patients with delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins tolerate intravenous application of heparin in controlled challenge tests. A patient with known delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins received the heparinoid, danaparoid, subcutaneously for thrombosis prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. After the first few injections, eczematous plaques developed; administration of the anticoagulant was continued and gradually resulted in generalized eczema despite treatment with topical and oral glucocorticoids. However, the patient required further anticoagulation. After discontinuation of subcutaneous injections and a switch to intravenous heparin, rapid improvement and clearing of skin lesions occurred. Therefore, in cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins, the switch from subcutaneous to intravenous heparin administration may be justified.

[Heparin induced thrombocytopenia and anticoagulation in renal replacemant therapy]. / Heparininduzierte Thrombozytopenie Typ II und alternative Antikoagulation bei CVVH.

The decision for an anticoagulant for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with acute renal failure and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has to be made carefully. Based on results from the literature argatroban is favoured in patients without hepatic dysfunction, referring to its short halftime and easy feasable monitoring. In the case of coexsisting hepatic disorder, danaparoid provides a safe alternative therapy. However, long halftime and the difficult elimination of the substance are unfavourable. Lepirudin represents another possible anticoagulant therapy. Bleeding complications and monitoring of the ecarin clotting time imposes limitations. Experiences with bivalirudin, fondaparinux and prostaglandines are limited and future trials will have to determine the significance of their application in RRT in HIT patients. Furthermore it has to be proven whether the combination of alternative anticoagulants with citrate prolongates circuit halftime of CVVH.

[Case of cardial varices rupture due to danaparoid sodium with portal venous thrombosis].

A 54-year-old man had been admitted to Nara city hospital because of hematemesis and dyspnea caused by physical exertion, and was given a diagnosis of esophago-cardial varices and portal venous thrombosis. He was transferred to our hospital for further examinations and treatments. Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) revealed the progression of portal venous thrombosis. Danaparoid sodium was administered to treat the portal vein thrombus. 5 days later, the patient was found to have hematemesis resulting from a cardial varices rupture. After endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) was performed, danaparoid sodium was administered for 2 weeks. After the treatment, portal vein thrombus had almost disappeared. Due to an increased risk of bleeding, cases of esophago-cardial varices with portal venous thrombosis must be treated with care. This is the first report of upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to danaparoid sodium. Danaparoid sodium must be carefully administered when patients have portal venous thrombosis with delicate varices.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) ar rare complications associated with use of unfractionate heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) HIT is a benign clinical condition characterized by a mil drop in platelet count with no clinical significance. HIT is an immune-mediated reaction associated with a wide spread "hypercoagulable" state resulting in arterial an venous thrombosis. There is a higher incidence of HIT with UFH use than with LMWH use. Orthopedic surger patients are at higher risk for developing HITT than are patients who receive prophylactic heparin for cardiovascular surgery or medical reasons. Therapy for patients suspected of having HITT should begin with immedi ate discontinuation of heparin in any form followed by pharmacologic inhibition with thrombin (e.g., recombinant hirudin [lepirudin], argatroban, danaparoid sodium).

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) : A medical-economic view]. / Die heparininduzierte Thrombozytopenie (HIT II) : Eine medizinökonomische Betrachtung.

BACKGROUND: In the context of inpatient and increasingly ambulatory thrombosis prophylaxis, heparins have been recognised as standard therapy for decades. In addition to the therapeutic benefit, therapy with heparins also entails the risk of undesirable side effects, such as bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II) is deemed a serious side effect. AIM: In the following work, HIT II is subjected to a medico-economic consideration (treatment, pharmaceuticals, subsequent costs due to possible complications) and, with regard to a possible HIT II prophylaxis, aspects of increasingly respected patient safety are also considered. METHODS: In the context of a literature search the active ingredients argatroban and danaparoid, which are approved for HIT II treatment, were evaluated. RESULTS: HIT II - especially in combination with thromboembolic complications - represents a medical-economic burden for the hospital. Although this is only an orientation guide, it shows that HIT II syndrome is not adequately cost-covered by the G­DRG system. An early thrombosis prophylaxis with argatroban/danaparoid for HIT II risk patients should therefore be taken into account for medical-related as well as patient safety-relevant aspects. According to experience, the pharmaceutical supply for these medically needed products (anticoagulants) should be ensured for reasons of patient safety. CONCLUSION: The risk of an immunological response to heparin therapy is known. Within the context of increased patient safety, thrombosis prophylaxis should be issued with a risk-adjusted prophylaxis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A report of 1,478 clinical outcomes of patients treated with danaparoid (Orgaran) from 1982 to mid-2004.

Clinical outcomes of 1,478 danaparoid treatment case reports for HIT (involving 1,418 patients) treated between 1982 and mid-2004 are analysed. Treatment in 1,291 episodes was for current HIT. Thromboembolism due to HIT was present in 39.4%. The patients include 33 children and 32 pregnancies. Two hundred twenty-six patients required extra-corporeal circuit use for renal failure, 241 patients had a concomitant thrombophilic disorder, and 351 major operations were performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed during danaparoid treatment (range one day to 3.5 years) plus three months of follow-up. Of the danaparoid-treated patients 83.8% survived; 63.7% had no or minor adverse events and 20.1% suffered serious non-fatal adverse events. New thromboses occurred during 9.7% of treatment episodes, and 16.4% of treatment episodes had an inadequate treatment response (i. e. developed one or more of the following: new/extended thrombosis, persistent/new platelet count reduction, unplanned amputation during treatment and follow-up). Major bleeding was reported in 8.1% of treatment episodes. Clinical cross-reactivity of danaparoid (new/persistent platelet count reduction and/or new/extended thrombosis) was confirmed serologically in 23 of 36 patients with positive pretreatment serological danaparoid cross-reactivity and in 22 of 32 additional patients tested at the time of the new event, i.e. a total of 45 patients (3.2%). Clinical outcomes of these case reports of patients given danaparoid because of suspected or confirmed HIT appear to be comparable with those reported by others who used direct thrombin inhibitors, especially when a sufficient danaparoid dosing intensity was used in patients with isolated HIT. Post-operative bleeding limits danaparoid use for cardiopulmonary by-pass surgery. Routine clinical and platelet count monitoring are required to minimise adverse reactions due to cross-reactivity.

Treatment of 51 pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance.

Pregnant patients with acute venous thrombosis or a history of thrombosis may need alternative anticoagulation, when heparin intolerance occurs. Only limited data on the use of the heparinoid danaparoid are available in literature. We reviewed the use of danaparoid in 51 pregnancies of 49 patients identified in literature between 1981 and 2004. All patients had developed heparin intolerance (32 due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 19 mainly due to heparin-induced skin rashes) and had a current and/or past history of thromboembolic complications. The initial danaparoid dose regimens ranged from 1000 to 7500 U/day administered s.c. or i.v.. The median duration of danaparoid use was 10 weeks. Danaparoid was used until delivery of a healthy infant in 37 pregnancies. In the remaining 14 pregnancies it was stopped earlier, because anticoagulant treatment was no longer required (3/14) or an adverse event led to a treatment discontinuation (11/14). Four maternal bleeding events were recorded during pregnancy, delivery or postpartum, two of them were fatal due to placental problems. Three fetal deaths were recorded, all associated with maternal complications antedating danaparoid use. Danaparoid cross-reactivity was suspected in 4 HIT patients and 5 non-HIT patients with skin reactions and was confirmed serologically in one of the two HIT patients tested. In none of five fetal cord blood- and three maternal breast milksamples anti-Xa activity transfer was observed. In conclusion danaparoid can be used as an alternative antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with high thrombotic risk and intolerance to heparins.

Risk factors for bleeding during treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of risk factors for bleeding and prospective evaluation of two bleeding risk scores in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, assessorblind, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: One university and 2 regional teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: 188 patients treated with heparin or danaparoid for acute venous thromboembolism. MEASUREMENTS: The presenting clinical features, the doses of the drugs, and the anticoagulant responses were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in order to evaluate prognostic factors for bleeding. In addition, the recently developed Utrecht bleeding risk score and Landefeld bleeding risk index were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.1%) and minor bleeding in 101 patients (53.7%). For all (major and minor combined) bleeding, body surface area < or = 2 m2 (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4; p = 0.01), and malignancy (odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-4.9; p = 0.02) were confirmed to be independent risk factors. An increased treatment-related risk of bleeding was observed in patients treated with high doses of heparin, independent of the concomitant activated partial thromboplastin time ratios. Both bleeding risk scores had low diagnostic value for bleeding in this sample of mainly minor bleeders. CONCLUSIONS: A small body surface area and malignancy were associated with a higher frequency of bleeding. The bleeding risk scores merely offer the clinician a general estimation of the risk of bleeding. In patients with a small body surface area or in patients with malignancy, it may be of interest to study whether limited dose reduction of the anticoagulant drug may cause less bleeding without affecting efficacy.

Danaparoid: a review of its use in thromboembolic and coagulation disorders.

UNLABELLED: Danaparoid (danaparoid sodium) is a low molecular weight heparinoid which has undergone clinical study for use as continued anticoagulant therapy in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), for the prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A nonblind study in patients with HIT has reported that complete clinical resolution is significantly more likely in patients receiving danaparoid than in patients receiving dextran 70. In addition, retrospective analyses and noncomparative data support the use of danaparoid for continued anticoagulant therapy in patients with HIT. Studies in patients undergoing hip surgery have shown that danaparoid significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative DVT compared with aspirin, warfarin, dextran 70 and heparin-dihydroergotamine, while additional data suggest no difference between danaparoid, enoxaparin and dalteparin. In patients undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery for removal of a malignancy, danaparoid reduced the incidence of postoperative DVT compared with placebo, but showed no significant difference when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Two studies have compared danaparoid with UFH in the prophylaxis of DVT following acute ischaemic stroke; twice daily danaparoid was significantly superior to UFH whereas there was no significant difference between a once-daily dosage and UFH. Danaparoid did not differ from UFH in terms of efficacy in the treatment of existing DVT. In all comparative studies examining the efficacy of danaparoid in the prophylaxis or treatment of DVT (versus warfarin, dextran 70, enoxaparin, dalteparin, aspirin, heparin-dihydroergotamine, UFH and placebo), the incidence of haemorrhagic complications did not differ between treatment groups. In patients with DIC, 61.9% of those patients receiving danaparoid experienced either disappearance or reduction of symptoms of DIC whereas 62% of those receiving UFH showed either no change or aggravation of their symptoms. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in tolerability or overall improvement of DIC. CONCLUSIONS: Danaparoid is an effective anticoagulant agent which has undergone clinical evaluation in a wide range of disease indications. Current guidelines support the use of danaparoid in prophylaxis of DVT following ischaemic stroke, and in patients who develop HIT. Danaparoid has shown efficacy in DIC, and for DVT prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip surgery although further data are required to establish the role of danaparoid in these indications. In particular, double-blind trials comparing danaparoid with such recommended therapies as the low molecular weight heparins will provide more definitive data on the place of danaparoid in the clinical management of these conditions and ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Danaparoid. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Danaparoid, a low molecular weight heparinoid consisting of a mixture of heparan, dermatan and chondroitin sulfates, has well established antithrombotic activity. The drug has a high antifactor Xa to antifactor IIa (thrombin) activity ratio, a low tendency to cause bleeding and minimal effects on the fibrinolytic system. Danaparoid has a low cross-reactivity rate with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (0 to 20%; mean approximately 10%). This represents a significant advantage over low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) as a potential replacement agent for unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a worldwide compassionate-use programme involving a total of 667 patients with HIT to date, 93% of danaparoid treatment courses were considered to be successful. Thrombocytopenia resolved in 91% of episodes. In a multicentre randomised comparative trial of danaparoid and dextran in patients with HIT plus thrombosis (HITT), significantly more danaparoid than dextran recipients had resolution of thromboses, and an effective clinical response was achieved in significantly more danaparoid recipients. Results of a retrospective case-controlled study of danaparoid and ancrod in patients with HITT showed significantly fewer new or progressive thromboses with danaparoid. In the compassionate-use programme, danaparoid was associated with a mortality rate of 10.4% during treatment (up to 3.5 years) and 7.8% during the follow-up period (3 months). 14 of 114 deaths during the follow-up period were considered to be related to danaparoid therapy. A mortality rate of 23.5% was reported in patients accepted for but not treated with, danaparoid. Mortality rates with danaparoid, ancrod and dextran in the comparative studies were similar (7, 11 and 12%, respectively). Severe bleeding was reported in 3.1% of patients in the compassionate-use programme, persistent or recurrent thrombocytopenia in 2.6% and new thromboembolic events/extension of existing thrombosis in 1.7%. The incidence of bleeding was similar with danaparoid and dextran in a comparative trial. Although in vitro cross-reactivity does not always translate into clinical cross-reactivity, testing is currently recommended, when possible, before initiation of danaparoid therapy. Thus, danaparoid appears to be an effective and well tolerated replacement agent for UFH in many patients with HIT who require further anticoagulation. The drug has low cross-reactivity with HIT-associated antibodies. Further comparative trials are needed to confirm these promising findings.

Pharmacokinetic studies of dalteparin (Fragmin), enoxaparin (Clexane), and danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) in stable chronic hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and danaparoid are an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UH) for anticoagulation during hemodialysis. Few data are available concerning their duration of action and whether drug accumulation occurs with continued use. We performed a prospective randomized study of the pharmacokinetics of dalteparin and enoxaparin plus danaparoid in 21 hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to administration of enoxaparin, 40 mg; dalteparin, 2,500 U; or danaparoid, 34 U/kg, for 4 weeks. Antifactor Xa levels were measured at the end of weeks 1 and 4 immediately before the injection and at prescribed intervals up to 48 hours postinjection. RESULTS: No bleeding or thrombotic episodes occurred during the study. Mean antifactor Xa activities 4 hours postinjection were 0.2 +/- 0.035 (SEM), 0.38 +/- 0.028, and 0.54 +/- 0.051 U/mL week 1 and 0.26 +/- 0.038, 0.40 +/- 0.055, and 0.64 +/- 0.050 U/mL week 4 for dalteparin, enoxaparin, and danaparoid, respectively. Both weeks 1 and 4, antifactor Xa activity 3 hours postdose was significantly greater for danaparoid sodium compared with enoxaparin and dalteparin. There were no significant differences between antifactor Xa activity week 4 versus week 1 for enoxaparin and dalteparin; however, danaparoid sodium levels during dialysis were significantly greater after 4 weeks of treatment (P = 0.0328, 1 hour; P = 0.003, 2 hours; P = 0.0128, 3 and 4 hours). CONCLUSION: Dalteparin and enoxaparin provide adequate anticoagulation for hemodialysis using single bolus injections at relatively low doses. Danaparoid sodium at the current recommended dosage resulted in greater anticoagulation than enoxaparin or dalteparin and may have an

Development of a high-pressure liquid chromatography method for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Owing to the disadvantage of radioactivity of the carbon 14 serotonin release assay and the time-consuming procedure of the enzyme immunoassay, we developed a high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method to detect serotonin released from donor platelets in the presence of heparins and serum samples from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Samples were analyzed from 60 healthy control subjects, 19 patients with HIT, and 20 patients without HIT after incubation with heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and danaparoid. Serotonin release was measured from platelets, 300 x 10(3)/microL, by HPLC. Serotonin eluted as a single peak from the HPLC column. Serum samples from patients with HIT released 5.5 to 352.5 and 6.6 to 1,533.3 ng/mL of serotonin from platelets in the presence of 0.2 IU/mL of heparin and LMWH, respectively. In the presence of 0 IU/mL of heparin, LMWH, danaparoid, and control samples, less than 2.5 ng/mL of serotonin were released. The HPLC method permits a rapid, sensitive, and quantitative determination of serotonin released from donor platelets for laboratory confirmation of HIT.

A comparative review of the adverse effect profiles of heparins and heparinoids.

On the basis of the results of the 11 studies reviewed, thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight (LMW) heparin or a heparinoid (danaparoid sodium; Org 10172) in patients undergoing total hip replacement did not show any important clinical differences with respect to the tolerability profiles of the different compounds. However, as a result of the great variability in the presentation and evaluation of blood losses and bleeding complications in these studies, it is mandatory to perform a direct comparison of the different compounds in question in a double-blind, prospective clinical study.

Lifesaving citrate anticoagulation to bridge ineffective danaparoid [correction of to bridge to danaparoid] treatment.

A case of successful regional anticoagulation with trisodium citrate in a patient who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia while on continuous hemofiltration is described. Immediate citrate anticoagulation allowed for maintenance of extracorporeal circulation until effective danaparoid therapy could be established. Recommended plasma antifactor Xa levels for hemodialysis may be inadequate in some cases. Values similar to those in use during cardiopulmonary bypass could be required.

Eczematous plaques related to unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy: cross-reaction with danaparoid sodium.

The use of low-molecular-weight heparin has been expanded to prevent pregnancy complications such as pregnancy loss, intra-uterine growth restriction and severe early-onset pre-eclampsia in high-risk patients with evidence of acquired or congenital thrombophilia. Therefore, the number of patients with side effects from low-molecular-weight heparin is expected to increase. We describe two women with infiltrating patchy plaques that developed in reaction to low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy. In the first patient, a switch to other formulations of heparin and heparinoid failed; the second patient, however, did well when enoxaparin was replaced with dalteparin. This report confirms the risk of skin reactions to enoxaparin and dalteparin, and reports on a skin reaction associated with danaparoid sodium in a pregnant woman.