ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) require validation in patients with hepatitis D virus (HDV)-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). Therefore, we aimed to validate existing NIT algorithms for CSPH in this context. METHODS: Patients with HDV-cACLD (LSM ≥10 kPa or histological METAVIR F3/F4 fibrosis) who underwent paired HVPG and NIT assessment at Medical University of Vienna or Hannover Medical School between 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively included. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), von Willebrand factor to platelet count ratio (VITRO), and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) were assessed. Individual CSPH risk was calculated according to previously published models (ANTICIPATE, 3P/5P). The diagnostic performance of Baveno VII criteria and refined algorithms (Baveno VII-VITRO, Baveno VII-SSM) was evaluated. The prognostic utility of NITs was investigated in the main cohort and an independent, multicenter, validation cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (HVPG ≥10 mmHg/CSPH prevalence: 62.7%, varices: 42.2%) were included. Patients with CSPH had significantly higher LSM (25.8 [17.2-31.0] vs. 14.0 [10.5-19.8] kPa; p <0.001), VITRO (n = 31, 3.5 [2.7-4.5] vs. 1.3 [0.6-2.0] %/[G/L]; p <0.001), and SSM (n = 20, 53.8 [41.7-75.5] vs. 24.0 [17.0-33.9] kPa; p <0.001). Composite CSPH risk models yielded excellent AUROCs (ANTICIPATE: 0.885, 3P: 0.903, 5P: 0.912). Baveno VII criteria ruled out CSPH with 100% sensitivity and ruled in CSPH with 84.2% specificity. The Baveno VII 'grey zone' (41.1%) was significantly reduced by Baveno VII-VITRO or Baveno VII-SSM algorithms, which maintained diagnostic accuracy. Hepatic decompensation within 2 years only occurred in patients who had CSPH or met Baveno VII rule-in criteria. The prognostic value of NITs was confirmed in the validation cohort comprising 92 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Standalone and composite NIT/diagnostic algorithms are useful for CSPH diagnosis in patients with HDV-cACLD. Thus, NITs may be applied to identify and prioritize patients with CSPH for novel antiviral treatments against chronic hepatitis D. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) have been developed to identify patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) at risk of decompensation, but conflicting data has been published regarding the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for the staging of fibrosis in patients infected with hepatitis D virus (HDV). In our study, including 51 patients with HDV-cACLD, LSM- and lab-based NITs yielded high AUROCs for CSPH. Moreover, only patients with CSPH or high non-invasively assessed CSPH risk were at risk of decompensation within 2 years, with the prognostic value of NITs confirmed in a validation cohort. Thus, NITs should be applied and updated in yearly intervals in clinical routine to identify patients with HDV-cACLD at short-term risk of clinical events; NITs may also guide prioritization for novel antiviral treatment options.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Hypertension, Portal , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/diagnosis , Hypertension, Portal/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/physiopathology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Adult , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/pathology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/complications , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Platelet Count , Prognosis , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , von Willebrand Factor/analysis , von Willebrand Factor/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Suboptimal awareness and low rates of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing contribute to underdiagnosis and gaps in accurate estimates of U.S. HDV prevalence. We aim to provide an updated assessment of HDV prevalence in the U.S. using a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis approach. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of articles reporting HBsAg seroprevalence and anti-HDV prevalence was conducted to calculate country-specific rates and pooled prevalence of CHB and HDV using meta-analyses. Country-specific CHB and HDV rate estimates were combined with number of foreign-born (FB) persons in the U.S. in 2022 from U.S. Census Bureau to estimate total numbers of FB with CHB and HDV, respectively. These estimates were further combined with updated estimates of U.S.-born persons with CHB and HDV to yield the total number of persons with CHB and HDV. RESULTS: In 2022, we estimated 1.971 million (M) (95% CI 1.547-2.508) persons with CHB; 1.547 M (95% CI 1.264-1.831) were FB and 0.424 M (95% CI: 0.282-0.678) were U.S.-born. The weighted average HDV prevalence among FB persons in the U.S. was 4.20% (64 938 [95% CI 33055-97 392] persons), among whom 45% emigrated from Asia, 25% from Africa, and 14% from Europe. When combined with updated estimates of U.S.-born persons with HDV, we estimate 75 005 (95% CI: 42187-108 393) persons with HDV in the U.S. CONCLUSIONS: Including both FB and U.S.-born persons, we estimated that 1.971 M and 75 005 persons were living with CHB and HDV, respectively, in the U.S. in 2022.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Adult , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The low prevalence of HDV infection in the United States could be attributed to insufficient testing rate, which can result in an underestimation of the true burden of HDV. The primary objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with HDV antibody (anti-HDV) or RNA testing, among participants with positive HBsAg in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants who tested positive for HBsAg between January 2000 and December 2022 within the VHA. We identified those who were tested for HDV, and patient and provider-level factors associated with HDV testing. RESULTS: Of 41,658 participants with positive HBsAg who had follow-up, 4438 (10.7%) were tested at least once for HDV, of which 135 (3.0%) were positive. Participants in the Northeast (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.44, p<0.001), and receiving hepatology care (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.24-1.54, p<0.001) were more likely, while those in the Midwest (aOR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79, p<0.001), under the care of a primary care provider (aOR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50-0.74, p<0.001), Blacks (aOR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.94, p=0.001), participants who were HCV antibody-positive (aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99, p=0.03), and participants who were HIV-positive (aOR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.90, p<0.001) were less likely to be tested for HDV. CONCLUSIONS: HDV screening rates in the VHA remain low overall. Participants who are Black, living in the Midwest, patients who are HIV-positive, and patients who are HCV-positive are less likely to be tested for HDV. These results suggest that risk-based screening strategies are ineffective in the VHA and highlight the need for refining testing strategies to increase HDV screening rates.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis C , Hepatitis D , Humans , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Retrospective Studies , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Despite the availability of vaccines, hepatitis B remains a significant cause of fulminant hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. The increase in reported hepatitis B cases in Germany is attributed to factors such as immigration and the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening introduced in 2020 as part of health check-ups. The indication for treatment depends on various factors, including the level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and inflammatory activity. Nucleos(t)ide analogues are the preferred treatment option, but functional cure, defined as HBsAg loss, is rare. In principle, treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues should usually be discontinued after loss of HBsAg, but can be stopped earlier under certain conditions and is currently the subject of ongoing research. Pregnancy and immunosuppression in the context of hepatitis B require special attention. In addition, a possible hepatitis D virus co-infection must always be taken into account, which is why every HBsAg-positive person should be tested for anti-HDV. Since 2020, the entry inhibitor bulevirtide has become a new treatment option alongside pegylated interferon alfa, which represents a significant advance in the treatment landscape.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis D , Liver Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a small RNA virus (1700 base pairs), which uses the surface proteins of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) as an envelope. Accurate and reliable quantitative detection of HDV RNA is central for scientific and translational clinical research or diagnostic purposes. However, HDV poses challenges for nucleic acid amplification techniques: (1) the circular genome displays high intramolecular base pairing; (2) high content of cytosine and guanine; and (3) enormous genomic diversity among the eight known HDV genotypes (GTs). Here, we provide step-by-step instructions for (A) a manual workflow to perform a quantitative HDV reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from serum and liver tissue and (B) a quantitative HDV RT-PCR assay with whole process control to be used for serum or plasma samples run on a fully automated system. Both assays target the conserved ribozyme region and demonstrate inclusivity for all eight HDV GTs. The choice of assay depends on the experimental needs and equipment availability. While the former is ideal for scientific research laboratories, the latter provides a useful tool in the field of translational research or diagnostics.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Liver , RNA, Viral , Workflow , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/virology , Liver/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , GenotypeABSTRACT
Objectives: Precise HDV-RNA detection and quantification are pivotal for diagnosis and monitoring of response to newly approved treatment. We evaluate the performance of three HDV RNA detection and quantification assays. Methods: Hepatitis Delta RT-PCR system kit, EurobioPlex HDV assay, and RoboGene HDV RNA Quantification kit 2.0 were used for testing 151 HBsAg-positive samples, 90 HDV-RNA negative and 61 HDV-RNA positive. We also evaluated serial dilutions of the WHO international standard for HDV, PEI 7657/12. All HDV-RNA positive samples were genotyped using a next-generation sequencing strategy. Results: Qualitative results indicated a 100% concordance between tests. Quantitative results correlated well, r2 = 0.703 (Vircell-vs-Eurobio), r2 = 0.833 (Vircell-vs-RoboGene), r2 = 0.835 (Robogene-vs-Eurobio). Bias index was 2.083 (Vircell-vs-Eurobio), -1.283 (Vircell-vs-RoboGene), and -3.36 (Robogene-vs-Eurobio). Using the WHO IS, Vircell overestimated the viral load by 0.98 log IU/mL, Eurobio by 1.46 log IU/mL, and RoboGene underestimated it by 0.98 log IU/mL. Fifty-nine samples were successfully genotyped (Genotype 1, n=52; Genotype 5, n=7; Genotype 6, n=1), with similar results for correlation and bias. Conclusion: This study underscores the necessity of using reliable HDV-RNA detection and quantification assays, as evidenced by the high concordance rates in qualitative detection and the observed variability in quantitative results. These findings highlight the importance of consistent assay use in clinical practice to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment monitoring of HDV infection.
Subject(s)
Genotype , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , RNA, Viral , Viral Load , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Viral Load/methods , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/virology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HDV antibody testing is recommended for universal screening and as the first line in an HDV double reflex testing strategy for effectively identifying patients with active infection for therapeutic treatments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a newly developed ARCHITECT HDV Total Ig (ARCHITECT HDV Ig) prototype assay. STUDY DESIGN: Performance characteristics were determined for the ARCHITECT HDV Ig and a reference test, LIAISON XL Anti-HDV using a well-characterized specimen panel, comprising HDV RNA positive (n = 62) and negative (n = 70) samples, and healthy US blood donors. RESULTS: Healthy US blood donors (n=200) showed 99.5% (199/200, 95%CI=97.65-99.98) specificity with ARCHITECT HDV Ig and 98.5 % (197/200, 95 %CI = 96.10-99.64) with LIAISON Anti-HDV. Among known HDV RNA positive samples, ARCHITECT HDV Ig detected 59/62 demonstrating 95.2 % sensitivity while LIAISON Anti-HDV sensitivity was 90.3 % (56/62). Among 101 HBV positive samples, 70 were reactive in the ARCHITECT test, 59 of which tested positive for HDV RNA for a positive predictive value (PPV) for the presence of HDV RNA was 84.3 %. For LIAISON Anti-HDV, 79 specimens were reactive and 56 contained HDV RNA: PPV for HDV RNA was 70.9 %. Among 70 HDV RNA negative samples, 39 were HBV positive. ARCHITECT HDV Ig negative predictive value (NPV) was 71.8 % and LIAISON Anti-HDV NPV was 41 % for the HBV positive group, respectively. CONCLUSION: When compared to the LIASON Anti-HDV test, the ARCHITECT HDV Ig assay demonstrated enhanced sensitivity and specificity and better NPV and PPV values for HDV RNA status. The ARCHITECT HDV Ig assay represents a promising tool for universal screening of all HBsAg-positive persons.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis Antibodies , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/immunology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Serologic Tests/methods , Automation, Laboratory/methods , Blood DonorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Infection with the hepatitis delta virus (HDV), a unique RNA virus that requires hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigens for its assembly, replication, and transmission, causes severe viral hepatitis. Compared to HBV monoinfection, HDV infection increases the risk of severe liver disease, necessity for liver transplant, and mortality. Global HDV prevalence estimates vary from 5% to 15% among persons with HBV, but screening guidelines for HDV are inconsistent; some recommend risk-based screening, while others recommend universal screening for all people with HBV. Among primary care providers (PCPs) in the US, there is a lack of awareness and/or insufficient adherence to current recommendations for the screening of HDV infection and management of chronic HDV. METHODS: Publications were obtained by conducting literature searches between July and August 2022 using the PubMed database and by manual searches of the retrieved literature for additional references. Information was synthesized to highlight HDV screening and management strategies for PCPs. Best practices for PCPs based on current guidelines and comanagement strategies for patients with HBV and HDV infection were summarized. RESULTS: We recommend universal screening for HDV in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. Confirmed HDV infection should prompt evaluation by a liver specialist, if available, with whom the PCP can comanage the patient. PCPs should counsel patients on the expected course of the disease, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, need for consistent disease monitoring and follow-up, and risk of disease transmission. Screening is suggested for sexual partners, household contacts, and family members, with HBV immunization recommended for those found to be susceptible. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for HDV infection; thus, management is limited to treatments for chronic HBV infection plus long-term monitoring of liver health. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs can be a valuable point of care for patients to access HDV/HBV screening, HBV immunization, and education, and can comanage patients with HBV and/or HDV infection.
Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection only occurs in the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. People with an HDV infection are at higher risk for severe liver disease, liver transplant, and death compared to those who only have an HBV infection. The estimated global prevalence of HDV infection ranges from 5% to 15% among people living with HBV. These measurements vary due to different study methods, inconsistent HDV screening guidelines, and patient risk factors for infection.In the US, primary care providers (PCPs) play an important role in improving community access to HDV information and testing. However, poor funding and inadequate resources have created a lack of awareness and insufficient adherence by PCPs to current recommendations for screening and management of HDV infection. This narrative review aims to fill this gap by providing an overview of HDV infection, patient risk factors, and practice guidelines for PCPs.The recommendations for PCPs in this review include providing universal screening for HDV to people with an HBV infection, especially those at high risk. PCPs can educate and comanage patients with liver specialists. Topics to discuss with patients include expected disease outcomes, lifestyle factors that may influence liver health, and the need for consistent follow-up appointments. Patient risk of disease transmission can also be discussed to identify sexual partners, household contacts, and family members who will need screening and HBV vaccination. While there are no FDA-approved therapies for treating HDV infection, we provide an overview of available and emerging HDV treatments.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Primary Health Care , Humans , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/therapy , United States/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/therapy , Hepatitis B/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV), a satellite virus of Hepatitis B virus, exacerbates liver damage in affected individuals. Screening for HDV antibodies in HBsAg positive patients is recommended, but the diagnostic accuracy of serological tests remains uncertain. This review aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for HDV. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus etc. for relevant studies. Studies measuring the sensitivity and specificity of serological HDV tests against PCR as a reference standard were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for each test method and sero-marker were calculated. The review included six studies with 11 study arms, evaluating ARCHITECT immunoassay, EIA, ELISA, QMAC, RIA, and Western Blot test methods targeting Anti-HDV IgG, Total anti-HDV and Anti-HDV IgM. Sensitivities for Anti-HDV IgG, Total Anti-HDV and Anti-HDV IgM, tests were 97.4%, 51.9%, and 62.0%, respectively, with specificities of 95.3%, 80.0%, and 85.0%. Our findings, with its limited number of studies, suggest that HDV serological tests, particularly those identifying Anti IgG exhibit high accuracy and can serve as effective screening tools for HDV.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests , Humans , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/virology , Hepatitis D/blood , Hepatitis D/immunology , Serologic Tests/methods , Serologic Tests/standards , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Immunoglobulin M/bloodABSTRACT
The prevalence of hepatitis B and delta viruses (HBV/HDV) among people who use drugs (PWUD) remains largely unknown. In the context of one Philadelphia-based harm reduction organization (HRO), this study aimed to assess HBV/HDV prevalence and facilitate linkage to care. Participants completed a demographic HBV/HDV risk factor survey and were screened for HBV and reflexively for HDV if positive for HBV surface antigen or isolated core antibody. Fisher's exact tests and regression were used to understand relationships between risks and HBV blood markers. Of the 498 participants, 126 (25.3%) did not have hepatitis B immunity, 52.6% had been vaccinated against HBV, and 17.9% had recovered from a past infection. Eleven (2.2%) participants tested positive for isolated HBV core antibody, 10 (2.0%) for HBV surface antigen, and one (0.2%) for HDV antibody. History of incarceration was associated with current HBV infection, while transactional sex and experience of homelessness were predictive of previous exposure. This study found high rates of current and past HBV infection, and a 10% HBV/HDV co-infection rate. Despite availability of vaccine, one quarter of participants remained vulnerable to infection. Findings demonstrate the need to improve low-threshold HBV/HDV screening, vaccination, and linkage to care among PWUD. The study also identified gaps in the HBV/HDV care cascade, including lack of point-of-care diagnostics and lack of support for HROs to provide HBV services.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B , Hepatitis D , Mass Screening , Humans , Female , Male , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/immunology , Adult , Middle Aged , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/immunology , Prevalence , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data on the management of Hepatitis B-Delta (HB-D) by hepatogastroenterologists (HGs) practicing in nonacademic hospitals or private practices are unknown in France. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of HGs practicing in nonacademic settings regarding HB-D. METHODS: A Google form document was sent to those HGs from May to September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 130 HGs (mean age, 45 years) have participated in this survey. Among HBsAg-positive patients, Delta infection was sought in only 89% of cases. Liver fibrosis was assessed using FibroScan in 77% of the cases and by liver biopsy in 81% of the cases. A treatment was proposed for patients with >F2 liver fibrosis in 49% of the cases regardless of transaminase levels and for all the patients by 39% of HGs. Responding HGs proposed a treatment using pegylated interferon in 50% of cases, bulevirtide in 45% of cases and a combination of pegylated interferon and bulevirtide in 40.5% of cases. Among the criteria to evaluate the treatment efficacy, a decrease or a normalization of transaminases was retained by 89% of responding HGs, a reduction of liver fibrosis score for 70% of them, an undetectable delta RNA and HBsAg for 55% of them and a 2 log 10 decline in delta viremia for 62% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis Delta screening was not systematically performed in HBsAg-positive patients despite the probable awareness and knowledge of the few responders who were able to prescribe treatments of hepatitis delta.
Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , France , Gastroenterology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis D/blood , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/drug therapy , Hepatitis D/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health problem and, in associated co-infection with hepatitis delta virus (HDV), causes the most severe viral hepatitis and accelerated liver disease progression. As a defective satellite RNA virus, HDV can only propagate in the presence of HBV infection, which makes HBV DNA and HDV RNA the standard biomarkers for monitoring the virological response upon antiviral therapy, in co-infected patients. Although assays have been described to quantify these viral nucleic acids in circulation independently, a method for monitoring both viruses simultaneously is not available, thus hampering characterization of their complex dynamic interactions. Here, we describe the development of a dual fluorescence channel detection system for pan-genotypic, simultaneous quantification of HBV DNA and HDV RNA through a one-step quantitative PCR. The sensitivity for both HBV and HDV is about 10 copies per microliter without significant interference between these two detection targets. This assay provides reliable detection for HBV and HDV basic research in vitro and in human liver chimeric mice. Preclinical validation of this system on serum samples from patients on or off antiviral therapy also illustrates a promising application that is rapid and cost-effective in monitoring HBV and HDV viral loads simultaneously.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Viral Load , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Humans , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Hepatitis D/virology , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Mice , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/blood , Coinfection/virology , Coinfection/diagnosis , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/blood , Genotype , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
About 0,5% of the population in Germany has a chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Untreated, chronic HBV infection can progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). If diagnosed early, antiviral therapy can effectively prevent liver disease progression, but a cure is currently hardly achievable. About 5% of those chronically infected with HBV are also co-infected with the hepatitis D virus (HDV). HBV/HDV co-infection leads to liver cirrhosis in approximately 50% of patients within 5-10 years. Since 2020, the cell entry inhibitor bulevirtide is available as a specific therapy for HBV/HDV co-infection.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Humans , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis D/drug therapy , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/complications , Hepatitis D, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis D, Chronic/complications , Coinfection , Liver Cirrhosis , Germany , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Hepatitis Delta VirusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) is underestimated and the assessment of fibrosis is recommended for this infection. We tested the diagnostic impact of an annual screening for HDV serology in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBs Ag) chronic carriers and followed the progression of fibrosis in these patients. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2021, we annually tested all chronic HBs Ag-positive patients for HDV antibody (HDV Ab). Each HDV Ab positive patient underwent annually repeated elastometry. Patients with detectable HDV RNA levels (group 1) were compared to those with undetectable HDV RNA (group 2). RESULTS: We identified 610 chronic HBs Ag-positive patients, and repeated screening for HDV Ab was performed in 534 patients. Sixty (11%) patients were HDV Ab positive at baseline and were considered as "coinfected". Seven cases of HDV superinfection were diagnosed through repeated screening. In co-infected patients, cirrhosis was initially diagnosed in 12/60 patients and developed in six patients during follow-up. HDV RNA PCR was performed in 57/67 patients and 27 had detectable levels (group 1). Cumulative incidence of cirrhosis at 7 years was 13.8% (95% CI 0-30) in group 1 and 0 (95% CI 0-0) in group 2 (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: A systematic screening for HDV in chronic HB Ag carriers revealed a high prevalence of HDV Ab. Repeated serological screening enables the diagnosis of superinfections in asymptomatic patients. Regular assessment of fibrosis using elastometry leads to the identification of incidental cirrhosis in patients with detectable HDV RNA.
Subject(s)
Carrier State , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Liver Cirrhosis , Mass Screening , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Male , Female , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Middle Aged , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/complications , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Mass Screening/methods , Carrier State/diagnosis , Adult , RNA, Viral/blood , Coinfection/diagnosis , Disease Progression , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Prevalence , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Aged , IncidenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) with a high genetic barrier to resistance, namely entecavir and tenofovir, has improved the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the optimal duration and dosage of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration, particularly in patients transplanted for HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection, remains controversial. METHODS: We evaluated 28 patients transplanted for HBV/HDV cirrhosis. After LT, each patient received a fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA for 6 mo post-LT and then continued with long-term NA prophylaxis (entecavir: 8, tenofovir: 20 patients). RESULTS: During 72 mo of follow-up, reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen at low titers was observed in 1 (3.6%) patient at 33 mo after HBIG discontinuation, which became negative after a single dose of HBIG 1000 IU/L, whereas both serum HBV DNA and HDV RNA remained persistently undetectable and without any clinical or biochemical evidence of HBV/HDV recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We showed for the first time the efficacy of a short, fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA followed by long-term NA monoprophylaxis against HBV/HDV recurrence after LT, although careful follow-up is needed after HBIG discontinuation, whereas further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Guanine , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis D , Immunoglobulins , Liver Transplantation , Recurrence , Tenofovir , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Female , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Immunoglobulins/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Tenofovir/therapeutic use , Tenofovir/administration & dosage , Guanine/analogs & derivatives , Guanine/therapeutic use , Guanine/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/virology , Treatment Outcome , DNA, Viral/blood , Adult , Aged , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Time Factors , RNA, Viral/blood , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology , Drug Administration Schedule , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Organophosphonates/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, CombinationABSTRACT
In 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections caused 1.5 million deaths, mostly attributable to complications from chronic infections, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the availability of a vaccine, 296 million people were chronically infected in 2019. Asia and Africa are the continents most affected by this infection, with around 100 million people infected in Africa as a whole.Hepatitis Delta or D virus (HDV), which is a "satellite" virus of HBV, is often misunderstood and its diagnosis remains neglected. However, it is associated with acute fulminant forms and chronic forms of hepatitis leading to a more rapid evolution towards cirrhosis and HCC than during HBV mono-infection. Research on these two viruses HBV and HDV has progressed a lot in recent years, and new treatments are currently in development.In people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PlHIV), liver disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Due to common modes of transmission, dual or triple HIV/HBV or HIV/HBV/HDV infections are relatively common, particularly in HBV endemic regions such as Africa. However, while today most co-infected patients benefit from effective treatment against both HIV and HBV, the latter is not active against HDV. In Africa, hepatitis B and D have already been the subject of several studies. However, the frequency and clinical consequences of these co-infections have been little studied in the general population and in PlHIV.This review seeks to update the epidemiological and clinical data and the therapeutic perspectives of HDV co-infections or triple infections (HIV-HBV-HDV) in Africa.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Coinfection , HIV Infections , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis D , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Coinfection/epidemiology , Africa/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B virus , Liver Cirrhosis , Hepatitis Delta Virus , HIV Infections/complications , Hepatitis D/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A decline in hepatitis D virus (HDV) occurrence was described in Europe and Asia. We estimated HDV prevalence in the Brazilian Amazon following hepatitis B vaccination. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey of HDV measured by total antibodies to HDV (anti-HD T). RESULTS: HDV prevalence was 41.9% whiting HBsAg carries and was associated with age (PR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.12-3.42; p = 0.01), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (PR = 4.38; 95% CI 3.12-6.13; p < 0.001), and clinical hepatitis (PR =1.44; 95% CI 1.03-2.00; p = 0.03). Risk factors were related to HDV biology, clinical or demographic aspects such as underlying HBV infection, clinical hepatitis and age. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that HDV infection continues to be an important health issue in the Brazilian Amazon and that the implementation of the HBV vaccination in rural Lábrea had little or no impact on the spread of HDV. This shows that HDV has not yet disappeared from HBV hyperendemic areas and reminding that it is far from being a vanishing disease in the Amazon basin.
INTRODUÇÃO: É descrito declínio na ocorrência do vírus da hepatite D (VHD) na Europa e Ásia. Estimamos a prevalência de infecção pelo VHD na Amazônia Ocidental, após a introdução da vacinação contra hepatite B. MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo de corte transversal da prevalência do VHD medido pela ocorrência de anticorpos totais (anti-HD T). RESULTADOS: A prevalência do VHD encontrada foi 41,9% entre os portadores do HBsAg, e esteve associado à idade (RP = 1,96; IC 95% 1,12-3,42; p = 0,01), infecção pelo HBV (RP = 4,38; IC 95% 3,12-6,13; p < 0,001) e história clínica de hepatite (RP =1,44; IC 95% 1,03-2,00; p = 0,03). Fatores de risco mostraram-se associados à biologia do HDV, aspectos clínicos e demográficos como infecção prévia pelo VHB e idade. CONCLUSÕES: O estudo demonstra que a infecção pelo VHD continua sendo um importante problema de saúde pública na região, e que a implantação da vacinação contra o VHB na área rural de Lábrea teve um impacto pouco significativo no controle do VHD, percebe-se que este ainda não desapareceu de áreas hiperendêmicas do VHB, e está longe de poder ser classificado como uma doença em declínio na bacia Amazônica.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis D/epidemiology , Hepatitis Delta Virus/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Brazil/epidemiology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Rural Population/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
O Município de Juruti, localizado a oeste do Estado do Pará, possui importante reserva de bauxita, cuja exploração iniciou em 2005. O surgimento ou aumento da frequência de doenças influenciadas por essa exploração, particularmente em relação às hepatites virais, é diversa da observada em qualquer outra região do mundo. Para definir a prevalência das infecções pelos vírus das hepatites A, B, C e D na demanda do hospital municipal de Juruti, entre fevereiro de 2007 e abril de 2008, foram coletadas amostras de soro de pessoas da demanda hospitalar e submetidas à análise dos marcadores sorológicos das hepatites A (VHA), B (VHB), C (VHC) e D (VHD), por técnicas imunoenzimáticas. Nas amostras positivas para os vírus B e C foram realizadas pesquisas para detecção do VHB-DNA e VHC-RNA, por PCR e RT-PCR, respectivamente. Entre as 1.630 amostras coletadas, ocorreu prevalência de 85,6 por cento para o anti-VHA total; de 0,7 por cento para o HBsAg; 9,1 por cento anti-HBc/anti-HBs e 31,4 por cento anti-HBs isolado. Entre os HBsAg+, 9,1 por cento eram HBeAg+; 63,6 por cento anti-HBe+ e 72,7 por cento VHB-DNA+. O anti-VHC foi positivo em 0,1 por cento e não foi detectada sorologia positiva para o VHD. Caracterizamos, em base laboratorial, alta prevalência de infecção pelo VHA, detecção de portadores crônicos e de suscetíveis para o VHB, presença de portador do VHC e a ausência de portadores do VHD. Recomenda-se a realização de estudos epidemiológicos locais, baseados em comunidades, para comparar com os dados hospitalares ora apresentados...
The Juruti Municipality, located to the west of the Pará State, possesses major bauxite reserves, the exploration of which started in 2005. The appearance of some diseases and the increased frequency of others have been influenced by this exploration, particularly in relation to viral hepatitis. These epidemiological trends are different from those observed anywhere else worldwide. To define the prevalence of the infections by the hepatitis A, B, C and D viruses in the Juruti municipal hospital between February 2007 and April 2008, serum samples were collected from patients and analyzed for serological markers of hepatitis A (HAV), B (HBV), C (HCV) and D (HDV) by immunoenzymatic techniques. In samples positive for the hepatitis B and C viruses, assays were performed for the detection of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA by PCR and RT-PCR, respectively. Among the 1,630 samples collected, the prevalence of total anti-HAV was 85.6 per cent; HBsAg was 0.7 per cent; anti-HBc/anti-HBs was 9.1 per cent and isolated anti-HBs were 31.4 per cent. Among the HBsAg+, 9.1 per cent were HBeAg+; 63.6 per cent were anti-HBe+ and 72.7 per cent were HBV-DNA+. Anti-HCV was positive in 0.1 per cent of the samples and positive serologies were not detected for HDV Laboratory-based characterization revealed a high prevalence of infection by HAV, detected chronic HBV carriers and those susceptible to HBV, identified an HCV carrier and revealed the absence of HDV carriers. Local, community-based epidemiological studies are recommended for comparison to the hospital data presented here...