Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Head and Neck or Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether perioperative immunonutrition is effective in adult patients with or without malnutrition undergoing elective surgery for head and neck (HAN) or gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. BACKGROUND: It is important to avoid postoperative complications in patients with cancer as they can compromise clinical outcomes. There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with or without malnutrition undergoing HAN or GI cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981 to 2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and HAN or GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were total postoperative and infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 4825 patients from 48 included studies, 19 had upper GI cancer, 9 had lower, and 8 had mixed cancer, whereas 12 had HAN cancers. Immunonutrition reduced the total postoperative complications (relative risk ratio: 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; certainty of evidence: high) and infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; certainty of evidence: high) compared with standard nutritional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with HAN and GI cancers significantly reduced total postoperative complications and infectious complications.

Pre-Operative Immunonutrition Enhances Postoperative Outcomes and Elevates Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Counts in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study (CRD42023464989) aimed to explore the effects of pre-operation immunonutrition on safety and immune related factors in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect all clinical randomized controlled trials of the application of pre-operation immunonutrition for patients with colorectal cancer, published until July 2023. The primary outcomes were safety and immune related factors. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were finally included. Preoperative immunonutrition could reduce the postoperative infection rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 0.88; p = .01), and wound infection rate (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.70; p < .001) in patients with colorectal cancer. For length of stay (mean difference (MD) = -1.10, 95% CI: -2.70, 0.49; p = .17), it was similar between groups. Meanwhile, patients in the pre-operation immune nutrition group also had significantly increased infiltrative lymphocytes CD16+ (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.06; p < .001), and CD56+ (MD = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.06; p < .001) cells in the tumor tissues, compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Immunonutrition intervention has the potential to reduce postoperative infectious complications and improve tumor infiltrative lymphocytes in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery.

Impact of Immunonutrition on Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

This study aimed to investigate the additional effects of perioperative immunonutrition (IMN) compared with preoperative immunonutrition (IMN) on anthropometric, nutritional, and biochemical parameters, hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer. Oral supplementation enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and dietary nucleotides was given to 25 patients before and after the operation (Group 2); 25 patients received the same formula before surgery and standard isocaloric nutrition following the operation (Group 1). Postoperative body weight, body mass index (BMI), and middle upper arm circumference (MUAC) of Group 1 decreased more than Group 2 during follow-up (p < 0.05). The biochemical parameters, C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were higher, and albumin was lower than the baseline in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between CRP and Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 scores, and prealbumin and NRS 2002 scores had a positive correlation (p = 0.007, r = 0.384; p = 0.012, r = 0.352). There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complications between the groups (p > 0.05). Perioperative immunonutrition, compared to preoperative immunonutrition, can be used as a positive and effective approach in improving some anthropometric measurements and biochemical parameters in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Effect of preoperative immunonutrition on postoperative short-term clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer cachexia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines(ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery and other guidelines) recommend preoperative immunonutrition for cachectic gastric cancer patients, the strength of the recommendation is weak, and the level of evidence is low. The benefits of preoperative immunonutrition still remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 112 patients with gastric cancer cachexia were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either preoperative enteral immunonutrition support (IN, n = 56) or standard enteral nutrition support (SEN, n = 56). The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications, and the secondary endpoints included the nutritional indicators, inflammatory markers, immune parameters, postoperative recovery and complications and gastrointestinal intolerance reactions. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative infectious complications(P = 0.040) and overall complications (P = 0.049)was significantly lower in the IN group compared to the SEN group. In terms of laboratory inflammatory indexes, patients in the IN group demonstrated significantly lower levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as higher levels of lymphocytes (LYMPH) and immunoglobulin A (IgA), compared to patients in the SEN group, with statistically significant differences. In terms of clinical outcomes, the IN group had a shorter duration of antibiotic use (P = 0.048), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.018), and lower total hospital costs (P = 0.034) compared to the SEN group. The IN group also experienced significantly less weight loss after surgery (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of immunonutrition formula has a positive impact on the incidence of infectious complications in patients with gastric cancer cachexia after surgery. It improves patients' inflammatory and immune status, shortens hospital stays, and reduces healthcare costs. Preoperative use of immunonutrition may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in this high-risk population.

Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Perioperative Immunonutrition for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BACKGROUND: Immunonutrition has been shown to reduce hospital stay and postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrointestinal, and head and neck surgery. However, its use has not been demonstrated in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of perioperative immunonutrition on patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC in reducing length of hospitalization and postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2017 to December 2018, patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases in a single center were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Patients with evidence of intestinal obstruction or with diabetes mellitus were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive perioperative oral immunonutrition or standard nutritional feeds. Length of hospital stay and rates of wound infection and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups in an intention-to-treat manner. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were recruited and randomized into two groups. Compliance to nutritional feeds in the preoperative period was significantly higher in the standard nutrition group (95.2% versus 75.4%, p = 0.004). There was no difference in postoperative compliance rates. Length of hospital stay and rates of wound infection and postoperative complications were higher in the standard nutrition group when compared with patients on immunonutrition (15.5 versus 11.1 days, p = 0.186; 19% versus 9.7%, p = 0.473; 16% versus 9.7%, p = 0.653; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC who received perioperative immunonutrition had shorter hospitalization and less wound infections and postoperative complications, although the differences with the standard nutrition group were not statistically significant. Potential benefits of perioperative immunonutrition need to be further evaluated in larger studies.

The Impact of Peri-operative Enteral Immunonutrition on Post-operative Complications in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immunonutrition (IMN) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery remains under-utilised and contentious. Despite previous meta-analysis reporting benefit, most recent randomised control trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate this and have recommended against its routine use. A contemporary meta-analysis may contribute to the recommendations for immunonutrition use and help select which patients may benefit. The objective of this study was to review IMN and its impact on post-operative outcomes in GI cancer surgery, exploring its role in both malnourished and non-malnourished populations, the optimal dose to use, cancer type of patients using IMN and the timing of IMN relative to the peri-operative period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The EMBASE and Medline databases were searched from 2000 to 2022 for RCTs evaluating IMN in adults undergoing GI cancer surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included (22 pre-operative IMN studies, 11 peri-operative IMN trials and 9 post-operative IMN trials; 4 trials had multiple IMN protocols) that reported on 3793 patients. The main outcome of post-operative infectious complications was reduced with IMN [odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.72]. This association was significant in subgroup analysis only with pre-operative and peri-operative administration and in trials including upper GI cancers, colorectal cancer and 'mixed GI' cancer populations, and significance was independent of nutritional status. IMN in pooled analysis reduced surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.81), anastomotic leak (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.93) and length of stay (LOS) by 1.94 days (95% CI - 3 to - 0.87). CONCLUSION: Immunonutrition was associated with reduced post-operative complications. Peri-operative administration may be the preferred strategy in reducing infectious complications, anastomotic leak, SSI and LOS.

The Effect of immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and traumatic abdominal surgery with a high risk of postoperative complications. Nutritional support, including immunonutrition (IMN) with added glutamine, arginine, and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, can improve patients' prognosis by regulating postoperative inflammatory response. However, the effects of IMN on PD patients' outcomes require further investigation. METHODS: PMC, EMbase, web of science databases were used to search literatures related to IMN and PD. Data such as length of hospital stay, infectious complications, non-infectious complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), mortality, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) duration, IL-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed on these data to study their pooled results, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS: This meta-analysis involved 10 studies and a total of 572 patients. The results showed that the use of IMN significantly reduced the length of hospital stay for PD patients (MD = -2.31; 95% CI = -4.43, -0.18; P = 0.03) with low heterogeneity. Additionally, the incidence of infectious complications was significantly reduced (MD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18, 1.00, P = 0.05), with low heterogeneity after excluding one study. However, there was no significant impact on non-infectious complications, the incidence of POPF and DGE, mortality rates, duration of SIRS, levels of IL-6 and CRP. CONCLUSION: The use of IMN has been shown to significantly shorten hospital stays and decrease the frequency of infectious complications in PD patients. Early implementation of IMN is recommended for those undergoing PD. However, further research is needed to fully assess the impact of IMN on PD patients through larger and higher-quality studies.

Shuttle between arginine and lysine: influence on cancer immunonutrition.

Amino acids which are essential nutrients for all cell types' survival are also recognised to serve as opportunistic/alternative fuels in cancers auxotrophic for specific amino acids. Accordingly, restriction of amino acids has been utilised as a therapeutic strategy in these cancers. Contrastingly, amino acid deficiencies in cancer are found to greatly impair immune functions, increasing mortality and morbidity rates. Dietary and supplemental amino acids in such conditions have revealed their importance as 'immunonutrients' by modulating cellular homeostasis processes and halting malignant progression. L-arginine specifically has attracted interest as an immunonutrient by acting as a nodal regulator of immune responses linked to carcinogenesis processes through its versatile signalling molecule, nitric oxide (NO). The quantum of NO generated directly influences the cytotoxic and cytostatic processes of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence. However, L-lysine, a CAT transporter competitor for arginine effectively limits arginine input at high L-lysine concentrations by limiting arginine-mediated effects. The phenomenon of arginine-lysine antagonism can, therefore, be hypothesised to influence the immunonutritional effects exerted by arginine. The review highlights aspects of lysine's interference with arginine-mediated NO generation and its consequences on immunonutritional and anti-cancer effects, and discusses possible alternatives to manage the condition. However, further research that considers monitoring lysine levels in arginine immunonutritional therapy is essential to conclude the hypothesis.

Preoperative Immuno-Nutrition and Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative immuno-nutrition has been associated with reductions in infectious complications and length of stay, but remains unstudied in the setting of an enhanced recovery protocol. The objective was to evaluate outcomes after elective colorectal surgery with the addition of a preoperative immuno-nutrition supplement. METHODS: In October 2017, all major colorectal surgeries were given an arginine-based supplement prior to surgery. The control group consisted of cases within the same enhanced recovery protocol from three years prior. The primary outcome was a composite of overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications and length of stay with subgroup analysis based on degrees of malnutrition. RESULTS: Of 826 patients, 514 were given immuno-nutrition prospectively and no differences in complication rates (21.5% versus 23.9%, P = 0.416) or surgical site infections (SSIs) (6.4% versus 6.9%, P = 0.801) were observed. Hospitalization was slightly shorter in the immuno-nutrition cohort (5.0 [3.0, 7.0], versus 5.5 days [3.6, 7.9], P = 0.002). There was a clinically insignificant difference in prognostic nutrition index scores between cohorts (35.2 ± 5.6 versus 36.1 ± 5.0, P = 0.021); however, subgroup analysis (< 33, 34-38 and > 38) failed to demonstrate an association with complications (P = 0.275) or SSIs (P = 0.640) and immuno-nutrition use. CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates and SSIs were unchanged with the addition of immuno-nutrition before elective colorectal surgery. The association with length of stay is small and without clinical significance; therefore, the routine use of immuno-nutrition in this setting is of questionable benefit.

The significance of immunonutrition nutritional support in patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lung cancer: case-control study.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the effect of postoperative early nutritional supplementation on the course of the disease was investigated in patients who were operated for non-small cell lung cancer and received adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The study examined the data of patients who anatomical pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer and who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy at our clinic between January 2014 and January 2020. Patients who received early postoperative nutritional supplements and those who continued with a normal diet were compared in terms of complications, mortality, recurrence, and survival. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 68 (84%) male and 13 (16%) female patients, and the mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 31.6 ± 17.9 (4-75) months. Metastasis was identified in eight (17.4%) patients in GrupNS (Nutritional Supplements) compared to 10 (28.6%) patients in GroupC (Control) (p = 0.231). Of the total, 11 (23.9%) patients died in GroupNS compared to 13 (37.1%) in GroupC (p = 0.196). Mean survival was 58.9 ± 3.8 (95% CI: 4.0-75.0) months in GroupNS compared to 43.5 ± 4.6 (95% CI: 6.0-66.0) months in GroupC (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Early nutritional supplements should be considered as having a positive effect especially on survival in this specific patient group involving factors with high catabolic effects, such as neoplasia, operation, and chemotherapy together.

Value of immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection: a trial sequential meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of immunonutrition (IM) in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery are unclear. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing IM with standard nutrition (SN) in pancreatic surgery was carried out. A random-effects trial sequential meta-analysis was made, reporting Risk Ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and required information size (RIS). If RIS was reached, false negative (type II error) and positive results (type I error) could be excluded. The endpoints were morbidity, mortality, infectious complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The meta-analysis includes 6 RCTs and 477 patients. Morbidity (RR 0.77; 0.26 to 2.25), mortality (RR 0.90; 0.76 to 1.07), and POPF rates were similar. The RISs were 17,316, 7,417, and 464,006, suggesting a type II error. Infectious complications were lower in the IM group, with a RR of 0.54 (0.36-0.79; 95 CI). The LOS was shorter in IM (MD -0.3 days; -0.6 to -0.1). For both, the RISs were reached, excluding type I error. CONCLUSION: The IM can reduce infectious complications and LOS The small differences in mortality, morbidity, and POPF make it impossible to exclude type II error due to large RISs.

Edible insects as a source of biopeptides and their role in immunonutrition.

Many edible insect species are attracting the attention of the food industry and consumers in Western societies due to their high content and quality of protein, and consequently, the potential to be used as a more environmentally friendly dietary source could be beneficial for humans. On the other hand, prevention of inflammatory diseases using nutritional interventions is currently being proposed as a sustainable and cost-effective strategy to improve people's health. In this regard, finding bioactive compounds such as peptides with anti-inflammatory properties from sustainable sources (e.g., edible insects) is one area of particular interest, which might have a relevant role in immunonutrition. This review aims to summarize the recent literature on the discovery of immunomodulatory peptides through in vitro studies from edible insects, as well as to describe cell-based assays aiming to prove their bioactivity. On top of that, in vivo studies (i.e., animal and human), although scarce, have been mentioned in relation to the topic. In addition, the challenges and future perspectives related to edible-insect peptides and their role in immunonutrition are discussed. The amount of literature aiming to demonstrate the potential immunomodulatory activity of edible-insect peptides is scarce but promising. Different approaches have been employed, especially cell assays and animal studies employing insect meal as supplementation in the diet. Insects such as Tenebrio molitor or Gryllodes sigillatus are some of the most studied and have demonstrated to contain bioactive peptides. Further investigations, mostly with humans, are needed in order to clearly state that peptides from edible insects may contribute to the modulation of the immune system.

Mapping the landscape of immunonutrition and cancer research: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on behalf of NutriOnc Research Group.

The ongoing global health challenge of cancer is driving the pursuit of innovative avenues for prevention, treatment, and enhanced outcomes. The convergence of nutrition and immune modulation, known as immunonutrition, is ready to act as a catalyst for transformative change in cancer research and therapy. Our study employs a bibliometric analysis to uncover the evolving trends within immunonutrition and cancer research across the past 25 years. Bibliometric data, including authors, journals, affiliations, and countries, were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package. Clustering algorithms were applied to keywords to identify thematic areas and their evolution. A total of 489 documents were analyzed, showing an annual growth rate of 8.7%, with a collaboration index of 5.41, highlighting comprehensive multidisciplinary involvement within this landscape. Core authors demonstrated sustained productivity, while occasional authors indicated widespread interest. The Medical University of Warsaw led in institutional contributions. Country-wise, Italy, France, and the USA emerged as forerunners in fostering research productivity. Key journals like 'Clinical Nutrition' served as beacons, emphasizing the multidimensional nature of this topic. The analysis highlighted growing research output and several collaborations, indicating the importance of immunoenriched nutrition in cancer treatment. The interplay of core authors and diversified engagement harmoniously accentuates the cross-disciplinary nature of this burgeoning field. International collaboration facilitated knowledge exchange. Prominent documents shaped the field, emphasizing the significance of nutritional interventions. Thematic clusters revealed varied focuses, including pharmaconutrients, surgical approaches, inflammation, and specific cancers. The expanding research output suggests further development, particularly in exploring immunoenriched nutrition's impact on cancer types and patient populations. The multidisciplinary nature and international collaborations enhance the field's progress. Gaps in research underscore the need for original studies and personalized approaches. This study guides future research, informing evidence-based nutritional interventions and advancing cancer care practices.

Comparison of enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Enteral immunonutrition is a nutritional intervention that has been studied in postoperative patients with gastric cancer, but its effectiveness is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition on immune function in patients who undergo gastric cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception of the review until 10 March 2023. Twelve studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. RESULTS: We studied 1124 patients, including 565 patients in the enteral immunonutrition group and 559 in the enteral nutrition (controls) group. All included randomized, controlled trials were high quality. CD4+ levels, lymphocytes, transferrin concentrations, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were not significantly different between the enteral immunonutrition and enteral nutrition groups. However, CD8+, immunoglobulins G and M, and proalbumin concentrations, CD4+/CD8+, and infectious complications were significantly higher in the enteral immunonutrition group than in the enteral nutrition group. A sensitivity analysis showed consistent results after excluding each study. Begg's test showed no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral immunonutrition is an effective nutritional intervention that improves immune function in patients who have undergone gastric cancer surgery.

Exploring the impact of arginine-supplemented immunonutrition on length of stay in the intensive care unit: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Arginine-supplemented enteral immunonutrition has been designed to optimize outcomes in critical care patients. Existing formulas may be isocaloric and isoproteic, yet differ in L-arginine content, energy distribution, and in source and amount of many other specialized ingredients. The individual contributions of each may be difficult to pinpoint; however, all cumulate in the body's response to illness and injury. The study objective was to compare health outcomes between different immunonutrition formulas. METHODS: Real-world data from October 2015 -February 2019 in the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database (formerly the Premier Healthcare Database) was reviewed for patients with an intensive care unit (ICU) stay and ≥3 days exclusive use of either higher L-arginine formula (HAF), or lower L-arginine formula (LAF). Multivariable generalized linear model regression was used to check associations between formulas and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: 3,284 patients (74.5% surgical) were included from 21 hospitals, with 2,525 receiving HAF and 759 LAF. Inpatient mortality (19.4%) and surgical site infections (6.2%) were similar across groups. Median hospital stay of 17 days (IQR: 16) did not differ by immunonutrition formula. Median ICU stay was shorter for patients receiving HAF compared to LAF (10 vs 12 days; P<0.001). After adjusting for demographics, visit, severity of illness, and other clinical characteristics, associated regression-adjusted ICU length of stay for patients in the HAF group was 11% shorter [0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.94; P<0.001)] compared to patients in the LAF group. Estimated adjusted mean ICU length of stay was 9.4 days (95% CI: 8.9, 10.0 days) for the HAF group compared to 10.6 days (95% CI: 9.9, 11.3 days) for the LAF group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite formulas being isocaloric and isoproteic, HAF use was associated with significantly reduced ICU length of stay, compared to LAF. Higher arginine immunonutrition formula may play a role in improving health outcomes in primarily surgical critically ill patients.

[Effectiveness of immunonutrition in the perioperative nutritional management of gastric cancer]. / Efectividad de la inmunonutrición en el manejo nutricional perioperatorio del cáncer gástrico.

Introduction: Objective: to assess the effectiveness of immunonutrition (IN) compared to standard nutritional formulas in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Material and methods: this is a real-life, observational retrospective cohort study. It included 134 patients, all of whom underwent gastrectomy at Montecelo Hospital between December 2019 and December 2022. Group A (N = 79 patients) received standard nutrition, and Group B (N = 55 patients) received formulas containing arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, and extra virgin olive oil. This protocol was carried out both pre and postoperatively for an average period of 10 days. The study evaluated hospital stay, the need for parenteral nutrition (PN), postoperative complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.1.® Results: in the IN group compared to the standard nutrition group, the hospital stay was reduced by 34 % (p < 0.001). The number of patients requiring PN decreased by 21.1 % (p = 0.022), and its duration also decreased by 33.2 % (p < 0.001). The risk of infectious complications was lower with IN, specifically 70.1 % less (p < 0.001). As for other postoperative complications, IN reduced the risk of intestinal obstruction by 84 % (p < 0.002), suture dehiscence by 90.9 % (p < 0.001), blood transfusion by 99.8 % (p < 0.001), pleural effusion by 90.9 % (p = 0.021), acute renal failure by 84.02 % (p = 0.047), and surgical re-intervention by 69.93 % (p < 0.011). In the IN group, there was less weight loss (p = 0.048) and a smaller decrease in postoperative albumin (p = 0.005) and cholesterol (p < 0.001). Conclusion: immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications, decreases hospital stay, and optimizes nutritional outcomes.

Introducción: Objetivo: valorar la efectividad de la inmunonutrición (IN) frente a las fórmulas nutricionales estándar en pacientes operados de cáncer gástrico. Material y métodos: se trata de un estudio de vida real, de tipo observacional, retrospectivo y de cohortes. Para este estudio se incluyeron 134 pacientes, todos ellos sometidos a gastrectomía en en el Hospital Montecelo, entre diciembre de 2019 y diciembre de 2022. El grupo A (N = 79 pacientes) recibió nutrición estándar y el grupo B (N = 55 pacientes) recibió fórmulas con arginina, nucleótidos, ácidos grasos omega-3 y aceite de oliva virgen extra. Este protocolo se ha realizado de forma pre y postoperatoria por un periodo medio de 10 días. Se evaluaron el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria, la necesidad de nutrición parenteral (NPT), las complicaciones postoperatorias y las variables antropométricas y analíticas. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron con el programa Stata 16.1.® Resultados: en el grupo de IN respecto al grupo de nutrición estándar: la estancia hospitalaria se reduce un 34 % (p < 0,001). La cantidad de pacientes que precisan NPT se reduce un 21,1 % (p = 0,022) y su duración también se reduce un 33,2 % (p < 0,001). El riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas es menor con la IN, concretamente un 70,1 % menos (p < 0,001). En cuanto a las otras complicaciones postoperatorias, la IN disminuye el riesgo de oclusión intestinal en un 84 % (p < 0,002), la dehiscencia de suturas en un 90,9 % (p < 0,001), la transfusión sanguínea en un 99,8 % (p < 0,001), el derrame pleural en un 90,9 % (p = 0,021), la insuficiencia renal aguda en un 84,02 % (p = 0,047) y la reintervención quirúrgica en un 69,93 % (p < 0,011). En el grupo de IN se observa una menor pérdida ponderal (p = 0,048) y una menor disminución de la albúmina (p = 0,005) y el colesterol postoperatorios (p < 0,001). Conclusión: la inmunonutrición reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias, disminuye la estancia hospitalaria y optimiza los resultados nutricionales.

Impact of Perioperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

There is no consensus on the efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery. We clarified the impact of perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative outcomes in patients with upper GI cancers. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Selection, and Emcare from 1981-2022 using search terms related to immunonutrition and upper GI cancer. We included randomized controlled trials. Intervention was defined as immunonutritional therapy, including arginine, n-3 omega fatty acids, or glutamine during the perioperative period. The control was defined as standard nutritional therapy. The primary outcomes were infectious complications, defined as events with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ II that occurred within 30 days after surgery. After screening, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed that immunonutrition reduced infectious complications (relative risk ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.92; certainty of evidence: Moderate) compared with standard nutritional therapy. In conclusion, nutritional intervention with perioperative immunonutrition in patients with upper GI cancers significantly reduced infectious complications. The effect of immunonutrition for upper GI cancers in reducing the risk of infectious complications was about 30%.

Preoperative Immunonutrition Significantly Reduced Surgical Site Infection After Urinary Diversion for Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy and ileal conduit have a high incidence of surgical site infection. In this study, we evaluated the effects of preoperative immunonutrition on its incidence following these procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 86 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit at our hospital between 2014 October and 2021 July. They were sequentially divided into the Immunonutrition group (n = 43) and Control group (n = 43). Patients in the Immunonutrition group drank 4 packs of IMPACT (Nestle, Japan) per day for 5 days before surgery. IMPACT contains arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid. We compared levels of plasma arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid before and after surgery and the rate of surgical site infection between the groups. Factors related to surgical site infection were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups except for surgical operative method (P < .001) and transfusion (P = .009). Levels of plasma arginine and eicosapentaenoic acid were significantly increased the day before surgery in the immunonutrition group (P < .001). However, the levels of plasma arginine on the day after surgery did not vary significantly between the groups. The incidence of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the immunonutrition group (P = .014). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association of surgical site infection with immunonutrition (OR = 0.14, CI 0.03-0.72, P = .019) and with ASA classification (OR = 4.76, CI 1.23-18.40, P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative immunonutrition significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infection following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit.

The Role of Immunonutrition in Patients.

Immunonutrition (IN) is defined as "the use of specific nutritional substrates, called «immunonutrients¼ having the ability of modulating specific mechanisms involved in several immune and inflammatory pathways" [...].

[Immunonutrition and (its impact on) health. Micronutrients and debilitating factors]. / Inmunonutrición y (su impacto en la) salud. Micronutrientes y factores debilitantes.

Introduction: Introduction: the interaction between immunity and nutrition is complex and multifaceted. Micronutrients, including vitamins and minerals, are essential for immune function. In turn, immune function and lifestyle habits can affect nutritional needs and micronutrient utilization, creating an interdependence between nutrition and immunity that can be modulated by both external and internal factors. Objectives: to examine the relationship between micronutrient intake and immune function, and how debilitating factors such as aging, disease, and stress can impact this relationship. Methods: a review of scientific evidence and recommendations from major international scientific societies was conducted to identify the importance of micronutrients in immune function and how debilitating factors can alter their impact. Results: the effect of different micronutrients on immune function is described. Debilitating factors like aging, stress, and chronic diseases can compromise the immune system and make the body more susceptible to infections. However, adequate intake of micronutrients and healthy habits can help to strengthen immunity and mitigate the effects of these debilitating factors. Conclusion: immunonutrition is a critical component for maintaining a strong and healthy immune system. Sufficient intake of micronutrients and healthy lifestyle habits can help improve immunity, especially in the presence of debilitating factors.

Introducción: Introducción: la interacción entre la inmunidad y la nutrición es compleja y multifacética. Los micronutrientes, incluidos las vitaminas y los minerales, son esenciales para la función inmunológica. A su vez, la función inmunológica y los hábitos de vida pueden afectar las necesidades nutricionales y la utilización de micronutrientes, creando una interdependencia entre la nutrición y la inmunidad que puede ser modulada por factores externos e internos. Objetivos: examinar la relación entre la ingesta de micronutrientes y la función inmunológica y cómo factores debilitantes, como el envejecimiento, la enfermedad y el estrés, pueden afectar esta relación. Métodos: se realizó una revisión de la evidencia científica y de las recomendaciones de las principales sociedades científicas internacionales para identificar la importancia de los micronutrientes en la función inmunológica y cómo los factores debilitantes pueden alterar su impacto. Resultados: se describe el efecto de diferentes micronutrientes sobre la función inmunológica. Los factores debilitantes como el envejecimiento, el estrés y las enfermedades crónicas pueden comprometer el sistema inmunológico y hacer que el cuerpo sea más susceptible a las infecciones. Sin embargo, una ingesta adecuada de micronutrientes y unos hábitos saludables pueden ayudar a fortalecer la inmunidad y mitigar los efectos de estos factores debilitantes. Conclusión: la nutrición inmunológica es un componente crítico para mantener un sistema inmunológico fuerte y saludable. Una ingesta suficiente de micronutrientes y unos hábitos de vida saludables pueden ayudar a mejorar la inmunidad, especialmente en presencia de factores debilitantes.