ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: After two-stage exchange due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the new prosthesis carries a high risk of reinfection (RePJI). There isn`t solid evidence regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis in 2nd-stage surgery. The objective of this study is to describe what antibiotic prophylaxis is used in this surgery and evaluate its impact on the risk of developing RePJI. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter case-control study in Spanish hospitals. The study included cases of PJI treated with two-stage exchange and subsequently developed a new infection. For each case, two controls were included, matched by prosthesis location, center, and year of surgery. The prophylaxis regimens were grouped based on their antibacterial spectrum, and we calculated the association between the type of regimen and the development of RePJI using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: We included 90 cases from 12 centers, which were compared with 172 controls. The most frequent causative microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis with 34 cases (37.8%). Staphylococci were responsible for 50 cases (55.6%), 32 of them (64%) methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative bacilli were involved in 30 cases (33.3%), the most common Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In total, 83 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were used in 2nd-stage surgery, the most frequent a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (48 occasions; 18.3%); however, it was most common a combination of a glycopeptide and a beta-lactam with activity against Pseudomonas spp (99 cases, 25.2%). In the adjusted analysis, regimens that included antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci AND Pseudomonas spp were associated with a significantly lower risk of RePJI (adjusted OR = 0.24; 95% IC: 0.09-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization in 2nd-satge surgery prophylaxis explains the wide diversity of regimens used in this procedure. The results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis in this surgery should include an antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Pseudomonas.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Spain , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiologyABSTRACT
Ankle arthritis can result in significant pain and restriction in range of motion. Total ankle replacement (TAR) is a motion-preserving surgical option used as an alternative to total ankle arthrodesis to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. There are several generations of TAR techniques based on component design, implant material, and surgical technique. With more recent TAR implants, an attempt is made to minimize bone resection and mirror the native anatomy. There are more than 20 implant devices currently available. Implant survivorship varies among prosthesis types and generations, with improved outcomes reported with use of the more recent third- and fourth-generation ankle implants. Pre- and postoperative assessments of TAR are primarily performed by using weight-bearing radiography, with weight-bearing CT emerging as an additional imaging tool. Preoperative assessments include those of the tibiotalar angle, offset, and adjacent areas of arthritis requiring additional surgical procedures. US, nuclear medicine studies, and MRI can be used to troubleshoot complications. Effective radiologic assessment requires an understanding of the component design and corresponding normal perioperative imaging features of ankle implants, as well as recognition of common and device-specific complications. General complications seen at radiography include aseptic loosening, osteolysis, hardware subsidence, periprosthetic fracture, infection, gutter impingement, heterotopic ossification, and syndesmotic nonunion. The authors review several recent generations of TAR implants commonly used in the United States, normal pre- and postoperative imaging assessment, and imaging complications of TAR. Indications for advanced imaging of TAR are also reviewed. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Subject(s)
Arthritis , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Joint Prosthesis , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/methods , Treatment Outcome , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Joint/surgery , Radiography , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Hypoplastic asymmetry due to hemifacial microsomia (HFM) often represents the most difficult reconstruction in the craniomaxillofacial clinic. Although autogenous grafts are generally used for temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR), the use of TMJR prostheses is not well established. The aim of this review was to identify, collect and analyse the use of extended TMJR (eTMJR) prostheses in patients with HFM, describing clinical features, surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Online searches of all major databases were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies with HFM patients treated with the eTMJR prostheses were included. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. A total of 19 studies, including 08 case studies, 06 case series and 05 retrospective cohort studies, met the inclusion criteria, where a total of 42 HFM patients were reported from 18 countries, mostly from the United States (05; 26%). Fifteen of the 42 cases (~36%) were male. The mean ± SD (range) age of patients in all studies was 19.79 ± 5.81 (9-36) years. The mean ± SD (range) of patient follow-up was 41.30 ± 35.50 (6-136) months. A total of 5 (10.6%) patients were implanted with bilateral eTMJR prostheses. The Pruzansky classification was used in 18 (~89.5%) studies, OMENS classification in 01 (~5%) study, whereas no classification was reported in one study. Only 01 (7.1%) study had documented the eTMJR classification for the prosthesis used. In growing patients with or without a history of failed autogenous tissues, TMJR prostheses may provide a viable alternative. Randomized studies with large cohorts are warranted to validate these preliminary results.
Subject(s)
Goldenhar Syndrome , Joint Prosthesis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Facial Asymmetry , Goldenhar Syndrome/surgery , Goldenhar Syndrome/complications , Joint Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , ChildABSTRACT
Disc perforation represents the result of the degenerative process in joint structures that may lead to pain, joint noise, restricted mouth opening, osteoarthritis, and even dentofacial anomalies. Even though discectomy has proven benefits, with promising outcomes reported, it is mainly described using an open approach. While some arthroscopic techniques have been published, they are limited to managing perforation, edge widening, and inflammation treatment and do not describe complete disc removal. We describe a novel step-by-step arthroscopic discectomy technique utilizing two operative cannulas that completely remove nonfunctional cartilaginous tissue.
Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Joint Prosthesis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Diskectomy , Cartilage , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery , Arthroscopy , Range of Motion, ArticularABSTRACT
This technical innovation demonstrates the use of ImmersiveTouch Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR)-guided total temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR) using Biomet stock prosthesis in 2 patients with condylar degeneration. TJR VR planning includes condylar resection, prosthesis selection and positioning, and interference identification. AR provides real-time guidance for osteotomies, placement of prostheses and fixation screws, occlusion verification, and flexibility to modify the surgical course. Radiographic analysis demonstrated high correspondence between the preoperative plan and postoperative result. The average differences in the positioning of the condylar and fossa prosthesis are 1.252 ± 0.269 mm and 1.393 ± 0.335 mm, respectively. The main challenges include a steep learning curve, intraoperative technical difficulties, added surgical time, and additional costs. In conclusion, the case report demonstrates the advantages of implementing AR and VR technology in TJR's using stock prostheses as a pilot study. Further clinical trials are needed prior to this innovation becoming a mainstream practice.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement , Augmented Reality , Joint Prosthesis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Virtual Reality , Humans , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Mandibular Condyle/surgery , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Design , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Temporomandibular Joint/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty as a surgical treatment option for trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis is recently revived. The aim of this study is to report on mid- and long-term results of the Elektra (single-mobility) and Moovis (dual-mobility) prosthesis for treatment of primary thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. METHODS: In this retrospective, monocentric, descriptive cohort study, 31 prostheses were evaluated that were implanted by a single surgeon in 26 patients between 2009 and 2019. Indication for surgery was trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (Eaton/Littler Stage II and III). Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months. The postoperative assessment included range of motion, pain, strength as well as functional scores (DASH, MHQ). Implant survival and complications were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: 10 Elektra and 21 Moovis prostheses were implanted between 2009 and 2019 with a mean follow-up of 74.2 months in the Elektra and 41.4 months in the Moovis group. The average patients' age at surgery was 64 years. Postoperative pain levels (VAS 0-10) were below 2 at rest and under stress in both groups. Grip/pinch strength and range of motion showed results comparable to the contralateral hand. Opposition was excellent with an average Kapandji index of 9.6 in both groups. Elektra achieved slightly better functional scores in the DASH and MHQ score. Satisfaction was high in both groups, and 96% of the patients would recommend the procedure. Metacarpophalangeal hyperextension > 15° was seen in 3 patients per group preoperatively and was corrected to < 5° post-surgery. 3 Elektra prostheses were revised due to cup loosening and dislocation for cup and/or neck replacement or secondary trapeziectomy. 1 Moovis prosthesis was revised with an exchange of the neck to a larger size due to restricted movement. After the mean follow-up of 7.9 years in Elektra and 3.5 years in MOOVIS, cumulative survival was 68.6% vs. 95.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this mid- to long-term retrospective analysis, total joint arthroplasty in primary trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis results in low pain levels, excellent mobility and clinical function. Patient satisfaction is overall high. While revision due to cup loosening occurred more often in patients with single-mobility implants, no cases of dislocation or loosening of components were observed in the dual-mobility group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, reference number S-150/2020.
Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints , Joint Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis , Prosthesis Design , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Carpometacarpal Joints/surgery , Aged , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies , Trapezium Bone/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Thumb/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has often been used to treat thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). However, guidelines for the CMC prosthesis shape remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the effective shape of a ball-and-socket prosthesis in restoring the range of thumb motion after TJA. METHODS: The participants were 10 healthy young adult men (22-32 years; 26.8 ± 3.57 [mean ± SD]). CT scans were performed in eight static limb positions during abduction and flexion. We defined three design variables (offset R, height H, and neck rotation angle Φ) as the variables that determine the basic shape of the ball-and-socket prosthesis. The ideal values of these design variables were examined based on the results of a 3D motion analysis, which evaluated the change in the posture of the first metacarpal (r, h, and φ corresponding to R, H, and Φ, respectively) relative to the center of rotation (COR) during abduction and flexion. We also simulated the effect of these design variables on the range of thumb motion after TJA using 3D CAD. RESULTS: We found that the values of r and h averaged over all limb positions were 6.92 ± 1.60 mm and 51.02 ± 1.67 mm, respectively, showing that these values remained constant regardless of limb position. In contrast, φ changed significantly. The simulation results indicated that Φ affected the range of thumb motion after TJA, and Φ = 0° relatively reproduced all limb positions compared to other values. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that the desirable values of R and H were the average of r and h over several limb positions and that Φ = 0° was effective in restoring the range of thumb motion after TJA. Our results will provide surgeons with new guidelines for selecting a prosthesis.
Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints , Joint Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Range of Motion, Articular , Thumb , Humans , Male , Thumb/surgery , Thumb/physiology , Thumb/diagnostic imaging , Carpometacarpal Joints/surgery , Carpometacarpal Joints/diagnostic imaging , Carpometacarpal Joints/physiopathology , Adult , Young Adult , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methodsABSTRACT
The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging, despite multiple available laboratory tests for both serum and synovial fluid analysis. The clinical symptoms of PJI are not always characteristic, particularly in the chronic phase, and there is often significant overlap in symptoms with non-infectious forms of arthroplasty failure. Further exacerbating this challenge is lack of a universally accepted definition for PJI, with publications from multiple professional societies citing different diagnostic criteria. While not included in many of the major societies' guidelines for diagnosis of PJI, diagnostic imaging can play an important role in the workup of suspected PJI. In this article, we will review an approach to diagnostic imaging modalities (radiography, ultrasound, CT, MRI) in the workup of suspected PJI, with special attention to the limitations and benefits of each modality. We will also discuss the role that image-guided interventions play in the workup of these patients, through ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided joint aspirations. While there is no standard imaging algorithm that can universally applied to all patients with suspected PJI, we will discuss a general approach to diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention in this clinical scenario.
Subject(s)
Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL) are common complications of total joint arthroplasty. An accumulation of evidence indicates the presence of microbial communities on prosthetic implants, but the overall microbial profile is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial composition of prosthetic implants obtained from PJI and AL patients using the 16S rRNA sequencing method. Patients who underwent revision hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty caused by PJI (n = 20) or AL (n = 10) were enrolled in the study. 16S rRNA sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed on the microbial specimens collected from synovial fluid, periprosthetic deep-tissue, and biofilm during the revision surgery. The sequenced raw data were analysed for microbial composition and ecological and differential abundance analyses using bioinformatics tools. The AL group had relatively balanced and higher diversity, with Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being prominent. In the PJI group, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predominant, especially in deep-tissue samples and biofilm samples, respectively. The differential abundance analysis identified 15 and 2 distinctive taxa in the AL and PJI groups, respectively. Our findings provided preliminary insights supporting the existence of periprosthetic microbiota in orthopedic implants and explaining the differences in microbial composition between the AL and PJI groups.
Subject(s)
Bacteria , Microbiota , Prosthesis-Related Infections , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biofilms/growth & development , Prosthesis Failure , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Diamond-like Carbon (DLC) has been used as a coating material of choice for a variety of technological applications owing to its favorable bio-tribo-thermo-mechanical characteristics. Here, the possibility of bringing DLC into orthopedic joint implants is examined. With ever increasing number of patients suffering from osteoarthritis as well as with the ingress of the osteoarthritic joints' malaise into younger and more active demographics, there is a pressing need to augment the performance and integrity of conventional total joint replacements (TJRs). Contemporary joint replacement devices use metal-on-polymer articulations to restore function to worn, damaged or diseased cartilage. The wear of polymeric components has been addressed using crosslinking and antioxidants; however, in the context of the metallic components, complications pertaining to corrosion and metal ion release inside the body still persist. Through this review article, we explore the use of DLC coatings on metallic bearing surfaces and elucidate why this technology might be a viable solution for ongoing electrochemical challenges in orthopedics. The different characteristics of DLC coatings and their feasibility in TJRs are examined through assessment of tribo-material characterization methods. A holistic characterization of the coating-substrate interface and the wear performance of such systems are discussed. As with all biomaterials used in TJRs, we need mindful consideration of potential in-vivo challenges. We present a few caveats for DLC coatings including delamination, hydrophobicity, and other conflicting as well as outdating findings in the literature. We recommend prudently exploring DLC films as potential coatings on metallic TJR components to solve the problems pertaining to wear, metal ion release, and corrosion. Ultimately, we advise bringing DLC into clinical use only after addressing all challenges and concerns outlined in this article.
Subject(s)
Carbon , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Diamond , Materials Testing , Humans , Diamond/chemistry , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry , Carbon/chemistry , Arthroplasty, Replacement , Feasibility Studies , Joint Prosthesis , Surface Properties , Corrosion , Prosthesis Design , Metals/chemistry , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Biocompatible Materials/chemistryABSTRACT
We retrospectively investigated the mid-term outcomes of arthroplasty using the AVANTA silicone implant for thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with boutonniere deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study involved 36 thumbs of 33 RA patients with a mean follow-up period of 5.1 years (range, 2.0-13.3). Postoperatively, the mean extension was significantly increased and the mean flexion was significantly decreased (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), resulting in the mean arc of range of motion (ROM) shifting in the direction of extension after surgery. Implant fracture was observed in 10 thumbs (28%), and 4 of these (11%) underwent revision surgery. The survivorship with implant fracture and revision surgery as endpoints were 73.4% and 91.8% at 5 years, respectively. The preoperative arc of ROM and the postoperative flexion range of the implant-fracture group were significantly greater than those in the no-implant-fracture group (p=0.039, 0.034, respectively). These results suggest the importance of patient education and careful rehabilitation to prevent excessive flexion. Overall, the AVANTA silicone implant showed a relatively high rate of implant fracture at our institute.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Hand Deformities, Acquired , Joint Prosthesis , Humans , Thumb/surgery , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Metacarpophalangeal Joint/surgery , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Arthroplasty , Hand Deformities, Acquired/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , SiliconesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of contemporary total ankle arthroplasty (TAAs) to primarily establish the current benefits and risks to facilitate informed decision making to secondarily establish if improvements are seen between subsequent generations of implants, bearing philosophy, and associated surgical technique. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data from January 2000 to January 2020 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. INCLUSION CRITERIA: English language papers, adult population, ≥20 ankles with a minimum follow up ≥24 months, pre- and post-operative functional scores available. Ankle implants were characterised by generations, which were determined from the original studies and confirmed based on literature set definitions. RESULTS: A total of 4642 TAAs in 4487 patients from 51 studies were included. The mean age was 61.9-years and follow up 57.8-months. Overall, 10-year survivorship rates were 77.63 %, with mobile bearing designs showing a small but significant advantage. Improved survivorship favoured the most modern implants at both two (p < 0.05), and 10-years (p < 0.01). The relative risk of a complication occurring improved with the evolution of implants e.g., nerve injury, and post-operative complications such as fracture, wound complications (e.g., dehiscence or heamatoma) and radiological abnormalities (e.g., radiolucencies, heterotopic bone formation and aseptic loosening). However, surgical site infection, and intra-operative fracture rates remain implant independent. CONCLUSIONS: Modern TAA offers improved survivorship, even with a trend to lower mean implantation age, similar complexity and ever changing indications. It would appear that implant evolution has reduced risks, especially those associated with revision, without affecting functional outcomes.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis DesignABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the long-term survival rates of silicone metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasties between two major implants in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, using implant fracture as an end point. We also evaluated the difference in postoperative function between patients with fractured and intact implants as a secondary objective. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 372 fingers of 133 hands that underwent silicone MCP arthroplasty between January 2000 and June 2019 (mean follow-up, 7.6 years). The survival rates of Swanson-type and Sutter-type implants were compared, using implant fracture as the end point after a radiographic evaluation. Clinical measures and upper limb functional assessments using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were performed in the nested cohort. RESULTS: The 10.6-year survival rates for implant fracture of Swanson- and Sutter-type implants were 86.2% and 9.4%, respectively, with significantly higher survival noted for Swanson-type implants. The Sutter-type implant showed increased susceptibility to fracture in all four fingers compared to the Swanson-type implant. Implant fractures were primarily observed at the stem-hinge junction. There were no significant differences in upper limb function between the fractured and intact implant groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sutter-type implants were found to be more prone to fracture compared with Swanson-type implants. However, implant fractures did not significantly affect upper limb function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger , Joint Prosthesis , Metacarpophalangeal Joint , Prosthesis Failure , Silicones , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Metacarpophalangeal Joint/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Adult , Prosthesis DesignABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic reduction and rigid fixation (ARRF) using a suture-free titanium screw as a treatment approach to temporomandibular joint's (TMJ) anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) and assess its impact on clinical outcomes, including improvements in symptoms related to TMJ disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of twenty patients presented to the Department of Orthognathic and Temporomandibular Surgery at West China Hospital of Stomatology between September 2022 and January 2023, complaining of symptoms such as pain, clicking, and limited mouth opening. Standard magnetic resonance image (MRI) imaging T1 and T2 sequences in both sagittal and coronal views study with closed and maximal open mouth positions were taken preoperatively to assess the disc's position, integrity, and shape. Also, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans images to find any degenerative changes and evaluate the condylar bone's features and volume. Additionally, the clinical examination assesses limited oral opening, mechanical pain, and the presence of any noises such as clicking and crepitus. All cases were treated under general anesthesia using the arthroscopic release, reduction, and rigid fixation of the TMJ's ADDwoR to establish a normal disc-condyle relationship and to restore the functional position. RESULTS: Patients' symptoms, such as pain and mouth opening, improved significantly following the arthroscopic treatment. Postoperative MRI and CBCT imaging follow-up conducted at 6 months demonstrated the stable position of the reduced TMJ disc and the fixation screw. Notably, none of the patients exhibited signs of relapse during this follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Overall, the ARRF of TMJ's ADDwoR using a suture-free titanium screw proved to be safe and provides satisfactory results, in addition to the several advantages of using suture-free titanium screws, such as biocompatibility, strong fixation, and durability. However, it is a technically demanding procedure requiring extensive, long-term training. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ARRF using a cost-effective fixation titanium screw to treat ADDwoR emerges as a clinically effective minimally invasive approach.
Subject(s)
Joint Prosthesis , Titanium , Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery , Bone Screws , PainABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical, subjective, and radiographic results of pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthritis at a single institution. METHODS: Patients treated with a pyrolytic carbon hemiarthroplasty between 2005 and 2015 were contacted for a clinical follow-up visit. Patients were assessed before surgery, one year after surgery, and again after a mean of 11 years (range: 6-16 years). Objective outcomes were assessed with grip strength, pinch strength, and range of motion (ROM). Subjective outcomes were assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (performance and satisfaction), and Visual Analog Scale pain scores at rest and during activity. Radiographic assessments were completed according to Sweets and Stern as modified by Wagner et al. RESULTS: A total of 68 fingers in 52 patients underwent PIPJ hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-six arthroplasties in 29 patients were available for the long-term follow-up, five patients had died, and the remaining cases were contacted by phone. Three cases were lost to follow-up. Preoperative diagnoses included 41 fingers with osteoarthritis or posttraumatic arthritis, and 27 fingers with inflammatory arthritis. Eight cases had undergone revision at the time of follow-up, and the 10-year implant survival was 72%. The revisions were performed after a mean of two years after surgery. Three patients had undergone soft-tissue procedures. Visual Analog Scale pain scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scores improved significantly compared with that before surgery. Grip strength and pinch grip remained unchanged. However, PIPJ ROM deteriorated significantly one year after surgery, when compared with that before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty of the PIPJ has an acceptable long-term implant survival, and the significant improvement in pain scores and patient-reported outcomes is maintained over time. Pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty could be a viable option in the management of PIPJ arthritis. Patients should be advised that PIPJ ROM deteriorates over time. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Subject(s)
Hemiarthroplasty , Joint Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Canada , Carbon , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Finger Joint/surgery , Pain/surgery , Range of Motion, ArticularABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with jaw deformity (UTMJAJD) may require simultaneous total joint prosthesis (TJP) reconstruction, sagittal split ramus (SSRO), and Le Fort I osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients treated with these procedures. METHODS: Patients diagnosed UTMJAJD between 2016 and 2018 were selected for the study. Mandible-first procedure was performed after ankylosis release with TJP on the ankylosed side and SSRO on the contralateral side. Le Fort I osteotomy with and without genioplasty was lastly performed. Maximal incisor opening (MIO), facial symmetry, and jaw and condyle stability were compared before, after operation, and during follow-ups. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in the study. Their average chin deviation was 9.5 ± 4.2 mm, and maxillary cant was 5.1 ± 3.0°. After operation, jaw deformity significantly improved, with chin deviation corrected 7.6 ± 4.1 mm (p = 0.015) and advanced 5.9 ± 2.5 mm (p = 0.006). After an average follow-up of 26.6 ± 17.1 months, MIO significantly increased from 11.4 ± 9.3 to 35.7 ± 2.6 mm (p = 0.000). The occlusion was stable with no significant positional or rotational changes of the jaw (p > 0.05). There was no obvious condylar resorption during follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous TJP reconstruction, SSRO, and Le Fort I osteotomy are reliable and effective methods for the treatment of UTMJAJD.
Subject(s)
Ankylosis , Dental Implants , Jaw Abnormalities , Joint Prosthesis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Mandibular Condyle , Cohort Studies , Osteotomy/methods , Mandible/surgery , Polymers , Ankylosis/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint replacement has become a valid option in the therapeutic arsenal of TMC joint osteoarthritis in Europe. Good mid-term results of the MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis suggested that it is a reliable procedure. This study aimed to assess the long-term results of this modular uncemented ball-and-socket hydroxyapatite-coated implant. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated 92 MAÏA TMC joint prostheses in 76 patients with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. Indications for the procedure were painful TMC joint osteoarthritis both at rest and during activity, despite nonsurgical treatment for more than six months. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 134 months (range: 120-158 months). Mean age at the time of surgery was 67 years (range: 53-84 years). The cohort comprised 86.8% of women (n = 66). The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 61.3 ± 17.1 to 19.6 ± 16. Range of motion was restored, and postoperative mobility was comparable with that of the contralateral side. Final Kapandji opposition score was almost normal (9.2 ± 0.7). Final key pinch and grip strength improved by 26% and 39%, respectively. Eight implants were surgically revised, six for trapezium cup loosening and two for instability because of polyethylene wear. Three cases of traumatic fracture of the trapezium in older patients were successfully treated with a cast for eight weeks. Five of 26 (20.8%) cases of preoperative-reducible z-deformity were not totally corrected after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival over 10 years was 88% (95% confidence interval: 84-93) versus 93% (95% confidence interval: 87-98) over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis is a reliable long-term surgical procedure for TMC joint osteoarthritis, improving overall function beyond 10 years. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement , Carpometacarpal Joints , Joint Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis , Range of Motion, Articular , Trapezium Bone , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Trapezium Bone/surgery , Trapezium Bone/diagnostic imaging , Carpometacarpal Joints/surgery , Carpometacarpal Joints/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome , Metacarpal Bones/surgery , Metacarpal Bones/diagnostic imaging , Disability EvaluationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Maintaining premorbid proximal humeral positioning is an essential consideration of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), as malposition of the prosthetic humeral head can result in poor clinical outcomes. Stemless aTSA prosthetic heads are usually concentric, while stemmed aTSA prosthetic heads are typically eccentric in nature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the ability to restore native humeral head position between stemmed (eccentric) vs. stemless (concentric) aTSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of 52 stemmed and 46 stemless aTSAs were analyzed. A best-fit circle was created using previously published and validated techniques to represent the premorbid humeral head position and axis of rotation. This circle was juxtaposed with another circle following the arc of the implant head. Next, the offset in center of rotation (COR), radius of curvature (RoC), and humeral head height above the greater tuberosity (HHH) were measured. Additionally, based on prior studies, an offset of >3 mm at any point between the implant head surface and premorbid best-fit circle was considered significant and further classified as overstuffed or understuffed. RESULTS: RoC deviation was significantly greater in the stemmed cohort than the stemless cohort (1.19 ± 1.37 mm vs. 0.65 ± 1.17 mm, P = .025). There was no statistically significant difference in deviation from premorbid humeral head between the stemmed and stemless cohorts for COR (3.20 ± 2.28 mm vs. 3.23 ± 2.09 mm, P = .800) or HHH (1.12 ± 3.27 mm vs. 0.92 ± 2.70 mm, P = .677). When comparing overstuffed implants to appropriately placed implants, there was a significant difference in overall COR deviation in stemmed implants (3.93 ± 2.51 mm vs. 1.92 ± 1.05 mm, P < .001). Superoinferior COR deviation (stemmed: 2.38 ± 3.01 mm vs. -0.61 ± 1.59 mm, P < .001; stemless: 2.70 ± 1.75 mm vs. -0.16 ± 1.87 mm, P < .001), mediolateral COR deviation (stemmed: 0.79 ± 2.65 mm vs. -0.62 ± 1.27 mm, P = .020; stemless: 0.40 ± 1.41 mm vs. -1.13 ± 1.96 mm, P = .020), and HHH (stemmed: 3.61 ± 2.73 mm vs. 0.50 ± 1.31 mm, P < .001; stemless: 3.98 ± 1.18 mm vs. 0.53 ± 1.41 mm, P < .001) were significantly different between overstuffed implants and appropriate implants in both the stemmed and stemless cohorts. DISCUSSION: Stemless and stemmed aTSA implants have similar rates of reproducing satisfactory postoperative humeral head COR with both producing COR deviation most commonly in the superomedial direction. Deviation in HHH contributes to overstuffing in both stemmed and stemless implants, COR deviation contributes to overstuffing in stemmed implants, while RoC (humeral head size) is not associated with overstuffing. Based on this study, it appears that neither eccentric nor concentric prosthetic heads are superior in recreating premorbid humeral head position.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Arthroplasty, Replacement , Joint Prosthesis , Shoulder Joint , Shoulder Prosthesis , Humans , Humeral Head/diagnostic imaging , Humeral Head/surgery , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Prosthesis DesignABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current methods available for assessment of radiolucency and in-between fin (IBF) growth of a glenoid component have not undergone interobserver reliability testing for an all-polyethylene fluted central peg (FCP) glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anteroposterior radiographs of an FCP glenoid component at ≥48 months comparing commonly used scales to a new method adapted to the FCP. Our hypothesis was that the new method would result in acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and a more accurate description of radiographic findings. METHODS: We reviewed ≥48-month follow-up radiographs of patients treated with a primary aTSA using an FCP glenoid. Eighty-three patients were included in the review. Radiographs were evaluated by 5 reviewers using novel IBF radiodensity and radiolucency assessments and the Wirth and Lazarus methods. To assess intraobserver reliability, a subset of 40 images was reviewed. Kappa statistics were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability; correlations were assessed using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (κ score) was as follows: IBF 0.71, radiolucency 0.68, Wirth 0.48, and Lazarus 0.22. Intraobserver agreement ranges were as follows: IBF radiodensity 0.36-0.67, radiolucency 0.55-0.62, Wirth 0.11-0.73, and Lazarus 0.04-0.46. Correlation analysis revealed the following: IBF to Wirth r = 0.93, radiolucency to Lazarus r = 0.92 (P value <.001 for all). CONCLUSION: This study introduces a radiographic assessment method developed specifically for an FCP glenoid component. Results show high interobserver and acceptable intraobserver reliability for the method presented in this study. The new scales provide a more accurate description of radiographic findings, helping to identify glenoid components that may be at risk for loosening.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Arthroplasty, Replacement , Glenoid Cavity , Joint Prosthesis , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Polyethylene , Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Prosthesis Design , Glenoid Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Glenoid Cavity/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previously, we reported early (2-year) findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed (TM) glenoid vs. cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of the current study is to report disease-specific quality of life, clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes at midterm (5-year) from this trial. METHODS: Five surgeons from 3 centers participated. Patients 18-79 years with a primary diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were screened for eligibility. Randomization to an uncemented TM or cemented POLY glenoid was performed intra-operatively after adequate bone stock was confirmed. Study intervals were baseline, 2- and 5-year postoperative. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) quality of life score. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, EuroQol-5 Dimensions, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey scores and clinical and radiographic examinations. Radiographic images were reviewed for metal debris according to Endrizzi. Mixed effects repeated measures analysis of variance for within- and between-group comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients who consented, 93 were randomized (46 TM; 47 POLY). There were no differences between groups at baseline (TM: mean age 66.5 years [standard deviation (SD) 6.4], 24 male and 22 female; and POLY: mean age 68.4 years [SD 5.5], 23 male / 24 female). Mean (SD) WOOS scores at baseline and 2 and 5 years were as follows: TM, 32 (21), 92 (13), and 93 (11); POLY, 27 (15), 93 (11), and 93 (10), respectively. No statistical or clinically relevant differences were noted with patient-reported outcomes between groups. Metal debris was observed in 11 (23.9%) patients, but outcomes were not negatively impacted, and debris severity was minor (grades 1 and 2). Complication rates were similar between groups (TM: 7 of 46 [15.2%], and POLY: 8 of 47 [17.0%]; P = .813). No aseptic glenoid failures were reported, but 1 patient in the TM group required revision because of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our short-term (2-year) findings were maintained with longer follow-up. At 5 years postoperation, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences between an uncemented second-generation TM glenoid and a cemented polyethylene glenoid with respect to disease-specific quality of life or patient-reported outcomes. No glenoid implant failures were reported, and complication rates were similar between groups. Only one complication was glenoid related (1 infection in the TM group). Metal debris was observed in 23.9% of patients with a TM glenoid but did not negatively influence implant survival, patient-reported outcomes, or shoulder function.