The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.

During mitosis in Ptk1 cells anaphase is not initiated until, on average, 23 +/- 1 min after the last monooriented chromosome acquires a bipolar attachment to the spindle--an event that may require 3 h (Rieder, C. L., A. Schultz, R. W. Cole, and G. Sluder. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310). To determine the nature of this cell-cycle checkpoint signal, and its site of production, we followed PtK1 cells by video microscopy prior to and after destroying specific chromosomal regions by laser irradiation. The checkpoint was relieved, and cells entered anaphase, 17 +/- 1 min after the centromere (and both of its associated sister kinetochores) was destroyed on the last monooriented chromosome. Thus, the checkpoint mechanism monitors an inhibitor of anaphase produced in the centromere of monooriented chromosomes. Next, in the presence of one monooriented chromosome, we destroyed one kinetochore on a bioriented chromosome to create a second monooriented chromosome lacking an unattached kinetochore. Under this condition anaphase began in the presence of the experimentally created monooriented chromosome 24 +/- 1.5 min after the nonirradiated monooriented chromosome bioriented. This result reveals that the checkpoint signal is not generated by the attached kinetochore of a monooriented chromosome or throughout the centromere volume. Finally, we selectively destroyed the unattached kinetochore on the last monooriented chromosome. Under this condition cells entered anaphase 20 +/- 2.5 min after the operation, without congressing the irradiated chromosome. Correlative light microscopy/elctron microscopy of these cells in anaphase confirmed the absence of a kinetochore on the unattached chromatid. Together, our data reveal that molecules in or near the unattached kinetochore of a monooriented PtK1 chromosome inhibit the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Micronuclei, CREST-positive micronuclei and cell inactivation induced in Chinese hamster cells by radiation with different quality.

PURPOSE: To study the relative biological effectiveness-linear energy transfer (RBE-LET) relationship for micronuclei (MN) and cell inactivation, in Chinese hamster cells irradiated with low-energy protons (0.88 and 5.04 MeV, at the cell entrance surface). Chromosome loss was also investigated by means of antikinetochore CREST staining. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cl-1 cells were exposed to different doses of X-rays, gamma-rays, 7.7 keV/microm and 27.6 keV/microm protons. The induction of MN, the distribution of MN per cell and the frequency of CREST-positive MN were evaluated in cytokinesis-blocked binucleated cells (BN cells) in the dose range 0.125-3 Gy. In parallel, cell survival experiments were carried out in samples irradiated with 0.5 to 4 Gy. RESULTS: MN yield and the frequency of BN cells carrying multiple MN (> or =2) were significantly higher after exposure to 27.6 keV/microm protons, compared with the other radiation types. In contrast, MN induction and MN distribution per BN cell were similar among 7.7 keV/microm protons, X- and gamma-rays up to 1 Gy. Cell survival experiments gave RBE values very close to those obtained with the MN assay. Both X-rays and 27.6 keV/microm protons yielded a significant proportion of CREST-positive MN at the highest doses investigated (0.75-3 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Good correlations between MN induction and cell inactivation were observed for both low- and high-LET radiation, indicating that the MN assay can be a useful tool to predict cell sensitivity to densely ionizing radiation with implications for tumour therapy with protons.

Simplified and optimized kinetochore detection: cytogenetic marker for late-G2 cells.

Cytogenetic detection of kinetochore proteins using the CREST antibody coupled with secondary antibodies labeled with different fluorescent probes has been optimized for several in vitro mammalian cell lines. This study investigated selected parameters including the influence of common fixatives (methanol, ethanol, methanol:acetic acid (3:1)), detergents (Triton-X100, Tween), fluorescent probes (CY3, BODIPY, FITC), washing protocols, and an antifading agent (paraphenylenediamine) on the detection of kinetochore proteins in control and X-ray (240 kVp)-irradiated cells. Utilizing an optimized fixation and staining protocol, a brilliant visualization of kinetochores in interphase cells was obtained in control as well as X-ray-irradiated interhase cells. Application of this improved kinetochore staining methodology readily permits discriminating cells containing either single or paired kinetochores, the latter of which are characteristic of late-G2 phase and prophase cells.

The kinetochore protein Bub1 participates in the DNA damage response.

The DNA damage response (DDR) and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) are two critical mechanisms by which mammalian cells maintain genome stability. There is a growing body of evidence that DDR elements and SAC components crosstalk. Here we report that Bub1 (budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1), one of the critical kinetochore proteins essential for SAC, is required for optimal DDRs. We found that knocking-down Bub1 resulted in prolonged H2AX foci and comet tail formation as well as hypersensitivity in response to ionizing radiation (IR). Further, we found that Bub1-mediated Histone H2A Threonine 121 phosphorylation was induced after IR in an ATM-dependent manner. We demonstrated that ATM phosphorylated Bub1 on serine 314 in response to DNA damage in vivo. Finally, we showed that ATM-mediated Bub1 serine 314 phosphorylation was required for IR-induced Bub1 activation and for the optimal DDR. Together, we elucidate the molecular mechanism of DNA damage-induced Bub1 activation and highlight a critical role of Bub1 in DDR.

Radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe in PARG-deficient cells.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational modification of proteins involved in the regulation of chromatin structure, DNA metabolism, cell division and cell death. Through the hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) has a crucial role in the control of life-and-death balance following DNA insult. Comprehension of PARG function has been hindered by the existence of many PARG isoforms encoded by a single gene and displaying various subcellular localizations. To gain insight into the function of PARG in response to irradiation, we constitutively and stably knocked down expression of PARG isoforms in HeLa cells. PARG depletion leading to PAR accumulation was not deleterious to undamaged cells and was in fact rather beneficial, because it protected cells from spontaneous single-strand breaks and telomeric abnormalities. By contrast, PARG-deficient cells showed increased radiosensitivity, caused by defects in the repair of single- and double-strand breaks and in mitotic spindle checkpoint, leading to alteration of progression of mitosis. Irradiated PARG-deficient cells displayed centrosome amplification leading to mitotic supernumerary spindle poles, and accumulated aberrant mitotic figures, which induced either polyploidy or cell death by mitotic catastrophe. Our results suggest that PARG could be a novel potential therapeutic target for radiotherapy.

Actin and myosin inhibitors block elongation of kinetochore fibre stubs in metaphase crane-fly spermatocytes.

We used an ultraviolet microbeam to cut individual kinetochore spindle fibres in metaphase crane-fly spermatocytes. We then followed the growth of the "kinetochore stubs", the remnants of kinetochore fibres that remain attached to kinetochores. Kinetochore stubs elongate with constant velocity by adding tubulin subunits at the kinetochore, and thus elongation is related to tubulin flux in the kinetochore microtubules. Stub elongation was blocked by cytochalasin D and latrunculin A, actin inhibitors, and by butanedione monoxime, a myosin inhibitor. We conclude that actin and myosin are involved in generating elongation and thus in producing tubulin flux in kinetochore microtubules. We suggest that actin and myosin act in concert with a spindle matrix to propel kinetochore fibres poleward, thereby causing stub elongation and generating anaphase chromosome movement in nonirradiated cells.

Effects of ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of kinetochores in crane-fly spermatocytes.

Ultraviolet (UV)-microbeam irradiation of a single kinetochore during anaphase generally causes all 6 of the half-bivalents in the cell to stop poleward motion within 1 min after the irradiation. The half-bivalents regain movement after remaining stopped for an average of 8.7 min, through different pairs in the same cell can resume at different times. Once movement resumes they usually continue movement until they reach the poles. As controls, to see if the effect is due to alteration of the kinetochore, we irradiated spindle fibers and chromosome arms using the same doses and wavelengths as for kinetochore irradiation. After spindle fiber irradiation, only the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated spindle fiber and its partner stop moving poleward while the other half-bivalents in the same cell are not affected. After irradiation of a chromosome arm, the movement of the two partner half-bivalents associated with irradiated arm either slowed or moved with unchanged velocity; no other half-bivalents in the cell were affected. Therefore, only irradiation of a kinetochore stops the movement of all the half-bivalents in the same cell. We suggest that the irradiated kinetochore sends a "stop" signal to the other kinetochores in the same cell.

Evidence for polewards forces on chromosome arms during anaphase.

We have identified new mitotic forces in crane-fly spermatocytes, separate from forces on the kinetochore, that propel chromosome arms in anaphase towards the spindle pole. In normal spermatocytes, the chromosome arms in anaphase generally trail the kinetochore to the pole. After ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of a kinetochore spindle fibre, however, chromosome arms moved closer to the pole than the kinetochore. This poleward arm-movement occurred regardless of whether the irradiation stopped the movement of the associated chromosomes, and occurred both in chromosomes associated with the irradiated fibre and in chromosomes not associated with the irradiated fibre. Arms that moved ahead of the kinetochore continued to lead the kinetochore to the pole for the duration of anaphase. Ultraviolet-microbeam-irradiation-induced movement of arms ahead of the kinetochore is specific for irradiation of spindle fibres: irradiations of the cytoplasm outside the spindle had no effect, and irradiations of the region between spindle and mitochondrial sheath (that outlines the spindle) and irradiations of the interzonal region are much less effective than irradiations of spindle fibres in causing arms to move. We argue that in crane-fly spermatocytes forces propelling chromosome arms toward the pole are part of normal anaphase.

Induction of kinetochore-positive and kinetochore-negative micronuclei in CHO cells by ELF magnetic fields and/or X-rays.

To test the genotoxic effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields, the induction of micronuclei by exposure to ELF magnetic fields and/or X-rays was investigated in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, using the cytokinesis block method. Micronuclei derived from acentric fragments or from whole chromosomes were evaluated by immunofluorescent staining using anti-kinetochore antibodies from the serum of scleroderma (CREST syndrome) patients. A 60 Hz ELF magnetic field at 5 mT field strength was applied, either before or after 1 Gy X-ray irradiation or without additional X-ray irradiation. No statistically significant difference in the frequency of micronuclei in CHO cells was observed between a sham exposure (no exposure to an ELF magnetic field) and a 24 h ELF magnetic field exposure. Exposure to an ELF magnetic field for 24 h before X-ray irradiation or for 18 h after X-ray irradiation did not affect the frequency of X-ray-induced micronuclei. However, the number of kinetochore-positive micronuclei was significantly increased in the cells subjected to X-ray irradiation followed by ELF magnetic field exposure, but not in the cells treated with ELF magnetic field exposure before X-ray irradiation, compared with exposure to X-rays alone. The number of spontaneous kinetochore-positive and kinetochore-negative micronuclei was not affected by exposure to an ELF magnetic field alone. Our data suggest that exposure to an ELF magnetic field has no effect on the number of spontaneous and X-ray-induced micronuclei. However, ELF magnetic field exposure after but not before X-ray irradiation may somehow accelerate X-ray-induced lagging of whole chromosomes (or centric fragments) in CHO cells.

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of epithelial and spermatocyte spindles suggest that forces act on the kinetochore fibre and are not generated by its disassembly.

Ultraviolet (UV) microbeam irradiations of crane-fly spermatocyte and newt epithelial spindles severed kinetochore fibres (KT-fibres), creating areas of reduced birefringence (ARBs): the remnant KT-fibre consists of two "stubs," a pole-stub attached to the pole and a KT-stub attached to the kinetochore. KT-stubs remained visible but pole-stubs soon became undetectable [Forer et al., 1996]. At metaphase, in both cell types the KT-stub often changed orientation immediately after irradiation and its tip steadily moved poleward. In spermatocytes, the chromosome attached to the KT-stub remained at the equator as the KT-stub elongated. In epithelial cells, the KT-stub sometimes elongated as the associated chromosome remained at the equator; other times the associated chromosome moved poleward together with the KT-stub, albeit only a short distance toward the pole. When an ARB was generated at anaphase, chromosome(s) with a KT-stub often continued to move poleward. In spermatocytes, this movement was accompanied by steady elongation of the KT-stub. In epithelial cells, chromosomes accelerated polewards after irradiation until the KT-stubs reached the pole, after which chromosome movement returned to normal speeds. In some epithelial cells fine birefringent fibres by chance were present along one edge of ARBs; these remnant fibres buckled and broke as the KT-stub and chromosome moved polewards. Similarly, KT-stubs that moved into pole stubs (or astral fibres) caused the pole stubs (or astral fibres) to bend sharply from the point of impact. Our results contradict models of chromosome movement that postulate that force is generated by the kinetochore disassembling the KT-fibre. Instead, these results suggest that poleward directed forces act on the KT-fibre and the KT-stub and suggest that continuity of microtubules between kinetochore and pole is not obligatory for achieving anaphase motion to the pole.

Coordinated movements between autosomal half-bivalents in crane-fly spermatocytes: evidence that 'stop' signals are sent between partner half-bivalents.

During anaphase-I in crane-fly spermatocytes, sister half-bivalents separate and move to opposite poles. When we irradiate a kinetochore spindle fibre with an ultraviolet microbeam, the associated half-bivalent temporarily stops moving and so does the partner half-bivalent with which it was paired during metaphase. To test whether a 'signal' is transmitted between partner half-bivalents we irradiated the spindle twice, once in the interzone (the region between separating partner half-bivalents) and once in a kinetochore fibre. For both irradiations we used light of wavelength 290 microns and a dose that, after irradiating a spindle fibre only, altered movement in 63% of irradiations (12/19); in 11 of the 12 cells both partner half-bivalents stopped moving after the irradiation. In control experiments we irradiated the interzone only: these irradiations generally did not stop chromosomal poleward motion but sometimes (14/29) caused poleward movement to each pole to be abruptly reduced to about half the velocity prior to irradiation. In double irradiation experiments we varied the order of the irradiations. In some double irradiation experiments we irradiated the interzonal region first and the spindle fibre second; in 75% (9/12) of the cells the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated fibre stopped moving while the partner half-bivalent moved normally, i.e. in 9/12 cells the interzonal irradiations uncoupled the movements of the partner half-bivalents. In other double irradiation experiments we irradiated the spindle fibre first and the interzone second: in 80% (4/5) of the cells the half-bivalents not associated with the irradiated spindle fibre resumed movement immediately after the irradiation while the other half-bivalent remained stopped. Interzonal irradiations therefore uncouple the poleward movements of sister half-bivalents and the uncoupling does not depend on the order of the irradiation. Our experiments suggest therefore that the irradiation of a spindle fibre causes negative ('stop') signals to be transmitted across the interzone and that irradiation of the interzone blocks the transmission of the stop signal.

Backward chromosome movement in crane-fly spermatocytes after UV microbeam irradiation of the interzone and a kinetochore.

Single anaphase chromosomes (in crane-fly spermatocytes) moved backwards after double irradiations with an ultraviolet light (UV) microbeam, first of the interzone and then of a kinetochore: the chromosome irradiated at the kinetochore moved backwards rapidly, across the equator and into the other half-spindle. High irradiation doses at the kinetochore were required to induce backward movement. Single irradiations of kinetochores or interzones were ineffective in inducing backward movements.

'Signalling' between chromosomes in crane-fly spermatocytes studied using ultraviolet microbeam irradiation.

The present article deals with signals from kinetochores in anaphase crane-fly spermatocytes: when a half-bivalent's kinetochore is irradiated with an ultraviolet microbeam during anaphase, all half-bivalents in the cell stop moving to both poles. Movement blockage is temporary, and different half-bivalent pairs resume movement at different times. Movement stoppage presumably is due to signals arising from the irradiated kinetochores and transmitted to the 'motors' of the other chromosomes. We used a second irradiation (of the interzone) to determine the path of the signal. We reasoned that if irradiation of the interzone blocked transmission of the putative signal, then those chromosomes not receiving the signal should continue to move after irradiation of a kinetochore. Interzone irradiation interfered with the signal in about 20% of the 51 cells irradiated doubly, in that chromosome(s) moving to one pole stopped while chromosome(s) moving to the other pole continued. There was a second indication that interzonal irradiation blocked the signal: in about 30% of the cells in which the kinetochore was irradiated first and interzone second, all half-bivalents resumed movement immediately after the second irradiation.

Structure of kinetochore fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes after irradiation with an ultraviolet microbeam: neither microtubules nor actin filaments remain in the irradiated region.

We studied chromosome movement after kinetochore microtubules were severed. Severing a kinetochore fibre in living crane-fly spermatocytes with an ultraviolet microbeam creates a kinetochore stub, a birefringent remnant of the spindle fibre connected to the kinetochore and extending only to the edge of the irradiated region. After the irradiation, anaphase chromosomes either move poleward led by their stubs or temporarily stop moving. We examined actin and/or microtubules in irradiated cells by means of confocal fluorescence microscopy or serial-section reconstructions from electron microscopy. For each cell thus examined, chromosome movement had been recorded continuously until the moment of fixation. Kinetochore microtubules were completely severed by the ultraviolet microbeam in cells in which chromosomes continued to move poleward after the irradiation: none were seen in the irradiated regions. Similarly, actin filaments normally present in kinetochore fibres were severed by the ultraviolet microbeam irradiations: the irradiated regions contained no actin filaments and only local spots of non-filamentous actin. There was no difference in irradiated regions when the associated chromosomes continued to move versus when they stopped moving. Thus, one cannot explain motion with severed kinetochore microtubules in terms of either microtubules or actin-filaments bridging the irradiated region. The data seem to negate current models for anaphase chromosome movement and support a model in which poleward chromosome movement results from forces generated within the spindle matrix that propel kinetochore fibres or kinetochore stubs poleward.