ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION: Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Surface , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II , Kidney Neoplasms , Lutetium , Radioisotopes , Radiopharmaceuticals , Humans , Male , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Dipeptides/adverse effects , Dipeptides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring/adverse effects , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring/therapeutic use , Lutetium/adverse effects , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Microenvironment , Female , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Antigens, Surface/metabolism , Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II/antagonists & inhibitors , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) plus the standard of care (SoC) significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival versus SoC alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the VISION trial. We evaluated the safety of additional cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and the impact of longer observation time for patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC. METHODS: VISION was an international, open-label study. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC or SoC alone. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was assessed in prespecified subgroups of patients who received ≤4 cycles versus 5-6 cycles of treatment and during each cycle of treatment. The TEAE incidence was also adjusted for treatment exposure to calculate the incidence per 100 patient-treatment years of observation. This analysis was performed for the first occurrence of TEAEs. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The any-grade TEAE incidence was similar in cycles 1-4 and cycles 5-6. TEAE frequency was similar across all cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. No additional safety concerns were reported for patients who received >4 cycles. The exposure-adjusted safety analysis revealed that the overall TEAE incidence was similar between arms, but distinct trends for different TEAE types were noted and the incidence of events associated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 remained higher in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Longer exposure to 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC was not associated with a higher toxicity risk, and the extended time for safety observation could account for the higher TEAE incidence in comparison to SoC alone. The findings support a favourable benefit-risk profile for 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in this setting and the use of up to 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who are clinically benefiting from and tolerating this therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer no longer responding to hormone therapy, an increase in the number of cycles of treatment with a radioactive compound called 177Lu-PSMA-617 from four to six had no additional adverse side effects.
Subject(s)
Dipeptides , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Male , Lutetium/adverse effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Thrombocytopenia is a relatively common dose-limiting toxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with NET. Although uncommon, some patients develop persistent cytopenia and eventually therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), which has a dismal prognosis. As the indications for PRRT are expanding, it is important to investigate factors that may predict cytopenias during/after PRRT. We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and cytopenia in patients with NET undergoing PRRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic NET with plan to receive four cycles of lutetium-177 were enrolled. CH was evaluated before PRRT using a panel of 220 genes with a targeted depth of ≥1,000×. Patients were followed during PRRT and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Of 37 patients enrolled, the median age was 68 years and 51.4% were male. Previous treatment exposures included alkylating agents in 30%, platinum agents in 8%, and external radiation in 13%. CH was detected in 35.1% using a variant allele frequency (VAF) cutoff of ≥2% and 45.9% with a VAF of ≥1%. The most common mutations were in age-related genes (DNMT3A, TET2). CH was not associated with anemia or neutropenia; however, it was associated with lower platelet count at baseline and more time spent in a thrombocytopenic state during/after PRRT. Five patients had bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) because of sustained hematologic dysfunction post-PRRT, and of those, diagnoses included clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) in three and idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) in two. CONCLUSION: CH is present in 35.1% of patients with NET and is associated with thrombocytopenia risk during PRRT. Future studies with long-term follow-up will delineate whether CH might be a predictor for higher risk of t-MN after PRRT.
Subject(s)
Clonal Hematopoiesis , Lutetium , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Thrombocytopenia/genetics , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Lutetium/adverse effects , Clonal Hematopoiesis/genetics , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radioisotopes/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer include use of radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617. 177Lu-PSMA-617 is used to target prostate cancer cells selectively by targeting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA); however, PSMA is also expressed on lacrimal glands among other tissues. Herein, we report on a case of a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 grade 3 dry eye event with concomitant blepharitis after administration of 177Lu-PSMA-617. The patient was managed with neomycin-polymyxin-dexamethasone 3.5-10000-0.1 ophthalmic suspension, artificial tears, lubricating ointments, lid scrubs, and oral antihistamines.
Subject(s)
Dipeptides , Dry Eye Syndromes , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring , Lutetium , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Male , Dry Eye Syndromes/etiology , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Lutetium/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring/adverse effects , Dipeptides/therapeutic use , Dipeptides/adverse effects , Aged , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Prostate-Specific AntigenABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The flare phenomenon is a transient increase in the number or intensity of lesions on bone scans after treatment, signifying curative effect. DOTA-ibandronic acid (DOTA-IBA) is a new prodrug that targets bone metastases and can be labeled with 177 Lu. Here, we report the case of a 58-year-old woman with bone metastasis, in whom the flare phenomenon was observed after 4 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTA-IBA treatment. No adverse effects were observed during the treatment and follow-up periods.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lutetium/adverse effects , Organometallic Compounds , RadioisotopesABSTRACT
Introduction: [177Lu]Lutetium (Lu)-oxodotreotide is a radiopharmaceutical drug used as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms. It provides an additional effective alternative treatment for these rare cancers. Although well tolerated, its safety profile must continue to be characterized to support its use as a first-line treatment or for additional cycles. This study evaluated factors associated with the occurrence of [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide induced short-term toxicity. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational monocentric study was carried out from July 2013 to October 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: patients who received at least four cycles of [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide and were followed up for 6 months after the last injection. Graduated toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0. Cox regression was used in the analysis. Results: Forty patients were included. The most frequent toxicities occurred during the first cycle and were graded as G1 or G2. As expected, toxicities were predominantly hematological and hepatic, with incomplete reversibility after each cycle. The following factors were significantly related to the occurrence of hematological or hepatic toxicity during PRRT: gastrointestinal primary tumor diagnosis, bone metastases, peritoneal metastases, pancreatic metastases or pulmonary metastases, and high tumor grade. Conclusion: Knowledge and consideration of these factors in adjusting [177Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide treatment regimen could help prevent or reduce the severity of these toxicities. Further studies are still warranted to refine these results and improve treatment management.
Subject(s)
Lutetium , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Radiopharmaceuticals , Somatostatin , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/radiotherapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Lutetium/adverse effects , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/adverse effects , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , RadioisotopesABSTRACT
We present the case of a patient with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received lutetium Lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan (also known as 177Lu-PSMA-617) due to progressive disease despite chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and radiation, including palliative mediastinal and central nervous system radiation. He was subsequently hospitalised for worsening acute onset dyspnoea despite clinically responding to therapy. Interval imaging revealed progressive multifocal ground-glass opacities superimposed on a background of underlying peribronchovascular fibrosis. Further workup, including an extensive workup to identify a possible infectious aetiology, ruled out most aetiologies leaving radiation pneumonitis (RP), radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) and drug-induced pneumonitis as possible diagnoses secondary to 177Lu -PSMA-617. The associated imaging findings of ground-glass opacities and consolidation can be like other aetiologies such as acute infection and subsequently may be treated incorrectly. In the use of theragnostics like 177Lu -PSMA-617, it is fundamental to apply the practices of radioprotection learnt from radiotherapy, as well as to consider prior radiotherapy treatments and their possible side effects when used in conjunction.
Subject(s)
Dipeptides , Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring , Pneumonia , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Radioisotopes , Male , Humans , Lutetium/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Whilst prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer globally, effective therapies for patients with advanced disease are lacking. In recent years, interest in using theranostic agents to treat castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic prostate cancer has emerged. Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody is a potential agent of significance; however, to date, reports on its toxicity and efficacy have been limited to small clinical trials in heavily pretreated patients. This retrospective study describes the real-world toxicity and efficacy profile of Lu-TLX591. METHODS: Eighteen patients received Lu-TLX591 at two private oncology centres in Australia. Patients were eligible if they had CRPC or metastatic prostate cancer and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-avid disease confirmed by PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET). Patients received two cycles of Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody (177 Lu-DOTA-rosopatamab) each dosed from 1.01-2.85 GBq, 14 days apart. Patient side effects, blood test results and radiology reports were recorded on the patient's electronic medical record (eMR). RESULTS: Prominent side effects included fatigue (55.6%), anorexia (16.7%), nausea (11.1%), and transfusion reactions (11.1%). All-grade haematological toxicities included lymphopenia (61.1%), anaemia (22.2%), leukopenia (27.8%), neutropenia (27.8%), and thrombocytopenia (27.8%). Grade 4 toxicity included lymphopenia (6.7%) and thrombocytopenia (6.7%). Patients' prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were as follows; ≥ 30% PSA decline (27.8%), ≥ 50% PSA decline (11.4%) and any PSA decline (38.9%). Follow-up radiology revealed 54.5% stable disease, 45.4% disease progression and 9.1% disease regression. CONCLUSION: Lu-TLX591 was safely administered at acceptable toxicity and its efficacy reflects previous clinical trials. Larger studies are required and are underway (NCT04786847; NCT05146973; NCT04876651) to determine Lu-TLX591 effectiveness amongst different prostate cancer populations and compare its efficacy against peptide-based radiopharmaceutical agents.