Promoting medication safety for older adults upon hospital discharge: Guiding principles for a medication discharge plan.

Older adults are at risk of adverse drug events during transition of care from hospital to community, thus optimal communication about medications at discharge is essential. Standardization of medication discharge plan (MDP) is lacking. This study aimed to (1) create a standardized MDP for older adults using consensus-based principles, (2) create a short-version MDP and (3) generate a practical guide. Modified Delphi was used to establish consensus on guiding principles for the MDP. Additionally, participants were asked about guiding principles deemed most essential, patient prioritization, the format and mode of transmission of the MDP. Twenty-six guiding principles reached consensus, with 17 prioritized for a short-version MDP. The practical guide includes explanations of the guiding principles, criteria for patient selection and recommendations on the format and mode of transmission. The results of this study will assist implementation of MDPs when older adults are discharged from hospital.

Role of a Pharmacist in Postdischarge Care for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore and describe the role of pharmacists in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched on January 30, 2023. Publication date limits were not included. Search terms were identified based on 3 concepts: kidney disease, pharmacy services, and patient discharge. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies, or study protocols, describing the pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care for patients with kidney disease, excluding kidney transplant recipients, were eligible. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Six unique interventions were described in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four interventions targeted patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization and 2 evaluated patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Pharmacists were a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) member in 5 interventions and were the sole provider in 1. Roles commonly identified include medication review, medication reconciliation, medication action plan formation, kidney function assessment, drug dose adjustments, and disease education. Some studies showed improvements in diagnostic coding, laboratory monitoring, medication therapy problem (MTP) resolution, and patient education; prevention of hospital readmission was inconsistent. Limitations include lack of standardized reporting of kidney disease, transitions of care processes, and differences in outcomes evaluated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review identifies potential roles of a pharmacist as part of a postdischarge MDCT for patients with varying degrees of kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease is inconsistent. Multidisciplinary care teams including a pharmacist provided consistent identification and resolution of MTPs, improved patient education, and increased self-awareness of diagnosis.

A newly developed algorithm for switching outpatient medications to medications listed in the hospital formulary: a prospective real-word evaluation in patients admitted electively to hospital.

PURPOSE: In many countries, outpatient and inpatient care are separated. During hospitalization, therefore, switching the outpatient medication to medication of the hospital formulary is required. METHODS: We newly designed a switching algorithm in six switching steps (S0-S5) and conducted a study at Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg (300 beds, 80% civilians). We performed (i) a medication reconciliation to obtain information on outpatient medications and (ii) a medication review to solve drug-related-problems, e.g., drug-drug interactions. We applied (iii) the algorithm to switch medications to the hospital formulary. RESULTS: (i) We identified 475 outpatient medications (median per patient: 4; Q25/Q75 2/7) in 100 patients consecutively admitted to hospital (median age: 71; Q25/Q75: 64/80 years). Of 475 medications, the switching algorithm could not be used since product names were missing in 23.9% and strength in 1.7%. In 3.2%, switching was not required since medication was not prescribed during the hospital stay. (ii) Drug-drug interactions were identified in 31 of 79 patients with more than one medication. (iii) Of 475 medications, 18.5% were on the hospital formulary and therefore did not need to be  switched (S0), 0.2% were on a substitution-exclusion list not allowing switching (S1), 42.0% were switched to a generic medication of the hospital formulary (S2), 1.7% to a therapeutically equivalent medication (S3), 0.4% were patient-individually switched (S4), and for 8.2% a standardized/patient-individual switching was not possible (S5). CONCLUSIONS: Despite comprehensive medication reconciliation, patient- and medication-related information for switching medications to the hospital formulary was often missing. Once all the necessary information was available, standardized switching could be easily carried out according to a newly developed switching algorithm.

Stakeholder perceptions of and attitudes towards problematic polypharmacy and prescribing cascades: a qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Problematic polypharmacy is the prescribing of five or more medications potentially inappropriately. Unintentional prescribing cascades represent an under-researched aspect of problematic polypharmacy and occur when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) is misinterpreted as a new symptom resulting in the initiation of a new medication. The aim of this study was to elicit key stakeholders' perceptions of and attitudes towards problematic polypharmacy, with a focus on prescribing cascades. METHODS: qualitative one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with predefined key stakeholder groups. Inductive thematic analysis was employed. RESULTS: Thirty-one stakeholders were interviewed: six patients, two carers, seven general practitioners, eight pharmacists, four hospital doctors, two professional organisation representatives and two policymakers. Three main themes were identified: (i) ADRs and prescribing cascades-a necessary evil. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) expressed concern that experiencing an ADR would negatively impact patients' confidence in their doctor. However, patients viewed ADRs pragmatically as an unpredictable risk. (ii) Balancing the risk/benefit tipping point. The complexity of prescribing decisions in the context of polypharmacy made balancing this tipping point challenging. Consequently, HCPs avoided medication changes. (iii) The minefield of medication reconciliation. Stakeholders, including patients and carers, viewed medication reconciliation as a perilous activity due to systemic communication deficits. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders believed that at a certain depth of polypharmacy, the risk that a new symptom is being caused by an existing medication becomes incalculable. Therefore, in the absence of harm, medication changes were avoided. However, medication reconciliation post hospital discharge compelled prescribing decisions and was seen as a high-risk activity by stakeholders.

Pharmacist-Led Medication Management in Acute Geriatric Medicine and Its Associations with Rehospitalizations: A Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization and discharge in older patients are critical and clinical pharmacists have shown to ameliorate risks. Our objective was to assess their benefit as part of the geriatric team regarding rehospitalizations and related outcomes after discharge focusing on general practitioners' decision to continue or change discharge medication (GPD). METHODS: Prospective implementation study with 6-month follow-up in an acute geriatric clinic. Patients ≥70 years with comorbidities, impairments, and a current drug therapy were consecutively assigned to three groups: control group (CG), implementation group (IG), and wash-out group (WG). CG only received medication reconciliation (MR) at admission; IG and their hospital physicians received a pharmaceutical counseling and medication management; during WG, pharmaceutical counseling except for MR was discontinued. We used a negative-binomial model to calculate rehospitalizations and days spent at home as well as a recurrent events survival model to investigate recurrent rehospitalizations. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients (mean age 82 years, 76 women [57.6%]) finished the project. In most of the models for rehospitalizations, a positive GPD led to fewer events. We also found an effect of pharmaceutical counseling on rehospitalizations and recurrent rehospitalizations in the CG versus WG but not in the CG versus IG models. 95.3% of medication recommendations by the pharmacist in the clinic setting were accepted. While the number of positive GPDs in CG was low (38%), pharmaceutical counseling directly to the GP in IG led to a higher number of positive GPDs (60%). DISCUSSION: Although rehospitalizations were not directly reduced by our intervention in the CG versus IG, the pharmacist's acceptance rate in the hospital was very high and a positive GPD led to fewer rehospitalization in most models.

Involvement in medication safety behaviors among older people with chronic diseases: systematic review of intervention studies.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically evaluate interventions and effects that promote involvement in medication safety among older people with chronic diseases and to provide new ideas and references for developing standardized and effective intervention strategies to improve patient involvement in medication safety. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search across twelve databases was conducted using both computerized and manual methods. The search was limited to studies designated as randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies and was conducted from the time of each database's inception until September 2023. Two researchers independently carried out qualitative analyses, which included screening the literature, extracting the data, and assessing the quality of the selected studies. RESULTS: This study included five studies involving a total of 388 participants, with interventions aimed at enhancing patient involvement in medication safety, including interactive health education, motivational interviewing, and medication reconciliation. However, direct evidence confirming the positive impact of these interventions in promoting medication safety behaviors among older people with chronic diseases is still lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Patient involvement in medication safety behaviors is essential for promoting healthy aging. Medication education, motivational interviewing, and medication reconciliation may improve the willingness and ability of older people to participate. However, limitations in the methodological quality of current studies prevent drawing definitive conclusions, highlighting the urgent need for more high-quality research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number CRD42023494924.

Development and validation of a new drug-focused predictive risk score for postoperative delirium in orthopaedic and trauma surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is the most common complication following surgery in elderly patients. During pharmacist-led medication reconciliation (PhMR), a predictive risk score considering delirium risk-increasing drugs and other available risk factors could help to identify risk patients. METHODS: Orthopaedic and trauma surgery patients aged ≥ 18 years with PhMR were included in a retrospective observational single-centre study 03/2022-10/2022. The study cohort was randomly split into a development and a validation cohort (6:4 ratio). POD was assessed through the 4 A's test (4AT), delirium diagnosis, and chart review. Potential risk factors available at PhMR were tested via univariable analysis. Significant variables were added to a multivariable logistic regression model. Based on the regression coefficients, a risk score for POD including delirium risk-increasing drugs (DRD score) was established. RESULTS: POD occurred in 42/328 (12.8%) and 30/218 (13.8%) patients in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Of the seven evaluated risk factors, four were ultimately tested in a multivariable logistic regression model. The final DRD score included age (66-75 years, 2 points; > 75 years, 3 points), renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, 1 point), anticholinergic burden (ACB-score ≥ 3, 1 point), and delirium risk-increasing drugs (n ≥ 2; 2 points). Patients with ≥ 4 points were classified as having a high risk for POD. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the risk score model were 0.89 and 0.81 for the development and the validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DRD score is a predictive risk score assessable during PhMR and can identify patients at risk for POD. Specific preventive measures concerning drug therapy safety and non-pharmacological actions should be implemented for identified risk patients.

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation service for patients after discharge from tertiary hospitals to primary care in Singapore: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Medication discrepancies commonly occur when patients are transferred between care settings. Despite the presence of medication reconciliation services (MRS), medication discrepancies are still prevalent, which has clinical costs and implications. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of various stakeholders on how the MRS can be optimized in Singapore. METHODS: This is a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews with 30 participants from the National Healthcare Group, including family physicians (N = 10), pharmacists (N = 10), patients recently discharged from restructured hospitals (N = 7) and their caregivers (N = 3) were conducted. All transcribed interviews were coded independently by three coders and inductive thematic analysis approach was used. RESULTS: Five core themes were identified. (1) The MRS enhanced healthcare services in various aspects including efficiency and health literacy; (2) There were several challenges in delivering the MRS covering processes, technology and training; (3) Issues with suitable patient selection and follow-up; (4) Barriers to scaling up of MRS that involve various stakeholders, cross-sector integration and environmental restrictions; and finally (5) Role definition of the pharmacist to all the stakeholders. CONCLUSION: This study identified the role of MRS in enhancing healthcare services and explored the challenges encountered in the provision of MRS from family physicians, pharmacists, patients and their caregivers. These findings supported the need for a shift of MRS towards a more comprehensive medication review model. Future improvement work to the MRS can be conducted based on the findings.

Clinicians' use of Health Information Exchange technologies for medication reconciliation in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation is essential for optimizing medication use. In part to promote effective medication reconciliation, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) invested substantial resources in health information exchange (HIE) technologies. The objectives of this qualitative study were to characterize VA clinicians' use of HIE tools for medication reconciliation in their clinical practice and to identify facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We recruited inpatient and outpatient prescribers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) and pharmacists at four geographically distinct VA medical centers for observations and interviews. Participants were observed as they interacted with HIE or medication reconciliation tools during routine work. Participants were interviewed about clinical decision-making pertaining to medication reconciliation and use of HIE tools, and about barriers and facilitators to use of the tools. Qualitative data were analyzed via inductive and deductive approaches using a priori codes. RESULTS: A total of 63 clinicians participated. Over half (58%) were female, and the mean duration of VA clinical experience was 7 (range 0-32) years. Underlying motivators for clinicians seeking data external to their VA medical center were having new patients, current patients receiving care from an external institution, and clinicians' concerns about possible medication discrepancies among institutions. Facilitators for using HIE software were clinicians' familiarity with the HIE software, clinicians' belief that medication information would be available within HIE, and their confidence in the ability to find HIE medication-related data of interest quickly. Six overarching barriers to HIE software use for medication coordination included visual clutter and information overload within the HIE display; challenges with HIE interface navigation; lack of integration between HIE and other electronic health record interfaces, necessitating multiple logins and application switching; concerns with the dependability of HIE medication information; unfamiliarity with HIE tools; and a lack of HIE data from non-VA facilities. CONCLUSIONS: This study is believed to be the first to qualitatively characterize clinicians' HIE use with respect to medication reconciliation. Results inform recommendations to optimize HIE use for medication management activities. We expect that healthcare organizations and software vendors will be able to apply the findings to develop more effective and usable HIE information displays.

Continuity of medication information transfer and continuous medication supply during hospital-to-home transitions - nationwide surveys in hospital and community pharmacies after implementing new legal requirements in Germany.

BACKGROUND: While successful information transfer and seamless medication supply are fundamental to medication safety during hospital-to-home transitions, disruptions are frequently reported. In Germany, new legal requirements came into force in 2017, strengthening medication lists and discharge summaries as preferred means of information transfer. In addition to previous regulations - such as dispensing medication at discharge by hospital pharmacies - hospital physicians were now allowed to issue discharge prescriptions to be supplied by community pharmacies. The aim of this survey study was to gain first nationwide insights into how these requirements are implemented and how they impact the continuity of medication information transfer and continuous medication supply. METHODS: Two nationwide self-administered online surveys of all hospital and community pharmacies across Germany were developed and conducted from April 17th to June 30th, 2023. RESULTS: Overall, 31.0% (n = 111) of all German hospital pharmacies and 4.5% (n = 811) of all community pharmacies participated. The majority of those hospital pharmacies reported that patients who were discharged were typically provided with discharge summaries (89.2%), medication lists (59.5%) and if needed, discharge prescriptions (67.6%) and/or required medication (67.6%). About every second community pharmacy (49.0%) indicated that up to half of the recently discharged patients who came to their pharmacy typically presented medication lists. 34.0% of the community pharmacies stated that they typically received a discharge summary from recently discharged patients at least once per week. About three in four community pharmacies (73.3%) indicated that most discharge prescriptions were dispensed in time. However, one-third (31.0%) estimated that half and more of the patients experienced gaps in medication supply. Community pharmacies reported challenges with the legal requirements - such as patients´ poor comprehensibility of medication lists, medication discrepancies, unmet formal requirements of discharge prescriptions, and poor accessibility of hospital staff in case of queries. In comparison, hospital pharmacies named technical issues, time/personnel resources, and deficits in patient knowledge of medication as difficulties. CONCLUSION: According to the pharmacies´ perceptions, it can be assumed that discontinuation in medication information transfer and lack of medication supply still occur today during hospital-to-home transitions, despite the new legal requirements. Further research is necessary to supplement these results by the perspectives of other healthcare professionals and patients in order to identify efficient strategies.

Nurse-led medication management as a critical component of transitional care for preventing drug-related problems.

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are critical medical issues during transition from hospital to home with high prevalence. The application of a variety of interventional strategies as part of the transitional care has been studied for preventing DRPs. However, it remains challenging for minimizing DRPs in patients, especially in older adults and those with high risk of medication discrepancies after hospital discharge. In this narrative review, we demonstrated that age, specific medications and polypharmacy, as well as some patient-related and system-related factors all contribute to a higher prevalence of transitional DPRs, most of which could be largely prevented by enhancing nurse-led multidisciplinary medication reconciliation. Nurses' contributions during transitional period for preventing DRPs include information collection and evaluation, communication and education, enhancement of medication adherence, as well as coordination among healthcare professionals. We concluded that nurse-led strategies for medication management can be implemented to prevent or solve DRPs during the high-risk transitional period, and subsequently improve patients' satisfaction and health-related outcomes, prevent the unnecessary loss and waste of medical expenditure and resources, and increase the efficiency of the multidisciplinary teamwork during transitional care.

Development of the entrustable professional activity 'medication reconciliation' for clinical pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are observable process descriptions of clinical work units. EPAs support learners and tutors in assessment within healthcare settings. For use amongst our pharmacy students as well as pre-registration pharmacists we wanted to develop and validate an EPA for use in a clinical pharmacy setting at LMU University Hospital. METHODS: The development of the clinical pharmacy EPA followed a set pathway. A rapid literature review informed the first draft, an interprofessional consensus group consisting of pharmacists, nurses, and medical doctors refined this draft. The refined version was then validated via online survey utilising clinical pharmacists from Germany. RESULTS: We designed, refined and validated an EPA regarding medication reconciliation for assessment of pharmacy students and trainees within the pharmacy department at LMU University Hospital in Munich. Along with the EPA description an associated checklist to support the entrustment decision was created. For validation an online survey with 27 clinical pharmacists from all over Germany was conducted. Quality testing with the EQual rubric showed a good EPA quality. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the first clinical pharmacy EPA for use in a German context. Medication reconciliation is a suitable EPA candidate as it describes a clinical activity performed by pharmacists in many clinical settings. The newly developed and validated EPA 'Medication Reconciliation' will be used to assess pharmacy students and trainees.

Transitions of care from the womb to the world: Implementation of inpatient neonatal med rec.

BACKGROUND: Medication use during pregnancy is common. Safety of fetal medication exposures is an important consideration for pregnancy and for pharmacologic management and care of newborns. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the impact of implementing a neonatal medication reconciliation service at an acute-care hospital. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: A neonatal medication reconciliation process was implemented at the University of New Mexico Hospital, a level 4 maternity center in a 500-bed academic medical center. Pharmacy personnel identified inpatient pregnant and postpartum patients who required medication reconciliation. In addition to performing maternal medication reconciliation, clinically significant medication exposures that occurred during pregnancy were recorded for neonates. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Our neonatal medication reconciliation process evaluated prenatal "medication use" via a maternal medication history. We considered our medication reconciliation to be occurring during a "transition" from in utero to being born, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been commonly reported as a transition of care in which pharmacists may play a role. EVALUATION METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive chart review of patients who had both maternal and neonatal medication reconciliation services performed. We collected demographics, comorbidities, medications, and clinically significant exposures from the medication reconciliation note. RESULTS: A total of 384 charts were included in the final analysis. Of these, 167 medication reconciliations (43.5%) identified at least one medication history problem and 97 medication histories (25.3%) identified at least one potentially clinically significant neonatal medication exposure. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Although several limitations exist, a neonatal medication reconciliation process can be implemented in any inpatient setting with pharmacy staff available to perform and record reconciliation. CONCLUSION: Opportunities for pharmacist involvement in pregnancy, postpartum, and neonatal care are expected to increase. Further research is warranted to more clearly determine the maternal and neonatal benefits of this medication reconciliation process and to link fetal exposures to outcomes.

Implementation of pharmacy-led preoperative medication reconciliation in surgical oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy-led medication history collection and reconciliation have demonstrated decreased medication errors, increased patient safety, and improved cost-savings. However, literature lacks documented efforts to implement such services in the preoperative space, where having accurate medication lists following complex procedures with high postoperative admission rates is critical. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of a telephonic pharmacy student and pharmacist-led preoperative medication reconciliation program. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: The service was piloted using third- and fourth-year pharmacy students to conduct telephonic medication histories for urologic surgical oncology patients. Weekly reports identified eligible patients with scheduled procedures within 2 weeks' time. Using standardized methods for patient communication and documentation, students authored telephone encounter notes that were reviewed and signed by pharmacist preceptors. Pharmacist preceptors also reconciled home medication lists based on students' findings. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A standardized preoperative medication reconciliation process was developed and implemented utilizing third- and fourth-year pharmacy students. Resulting notes were available for surgical staff on the day of patients' procedures and upon potential postoperative admission. EVALUATION METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate successfully documented medication histories collected by pharmacy students within the pharmacy-led preoperative medication reconciliation program. RESULTS: Forty-six medication reconciliation notes were identified between August 2021 and February 2022, and 39 met inclusion criteria. Amongst the 177 medication additions, deletions, and edits, deletions were the most common, and 95% of patients had at least 1 medication discrepancy identified. A total of 33 medication classes were represented by the identified discrepancies, and each encounter took an average of 33 minutes to complete. CONCLUSION: Preoperative medication reconciliation services can be successfully accomplished through a telephonic pharmacy student and pharmacist-led workflow. Accurate medication histories aid in minimizing medication errors and increasing patient safety.

Impact of a patient risk-scoring tool pilot on prioritization of pharmacy-conducted medication histories.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% to 70% of patients have at least 1 medication discrepancy in their initial medication history. These discrepancies can lead to errors on admission and discharge orders and have the potential to cause patient harm and incur added costs associated with increased length of stay and readmission rates. Several studies have demonstrated improved medication history accuracy with pharmacy-conducted services, but variations in practice exist due to challenges with workflow and resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of implementing a patient risk-scoring tool for the prioritization of medication history review by pharmacy staff. METHODS: This quasi-experimental, single-center study was conducted at a 948-bed academic medical center as a pilot study with the medication history team which consists of pharmacists and certified pharmacy technicians in the emergency department. The endpoints assessed included pharmacy completion rate of patients in the high-risk category, overall pharmacy conducted medication history rate, and the proportion of medication discrepancies identified after reconciliation. RESULTS: The number of medication histories completed by pharmacy (n=849) decreased by 5.7% in the postintervention period (P = 0.002). Between the preintervention and postintervention period, there were fewer low-risk patients being captured by pharmacy (89.7% to 59.9%, respectively). There was also an increase in the number of medium-risk (Δ=25.4%) and high-risk patients (Δ=4.4%) being captured by pharmacy staff (P < 0.017, α = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Use of a risk-scoring tool allowed pharmacy staff to prioritize workflow and capture more high-risk patients for medication history.

Establishment of a clinical pharmacist-led multiple myeloma clinic with collaborative prescribing model at the national center for cancer care and research in Qatar.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a chronic and incurable hematologic malignancy that is prevalent among the elderly. Interprofessional patient care showed superiority over physician-only care in multiple settings, including MM. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist (CP)-led clinic and CPs interventions on MM patient care. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Real-world analysis of ambulatory patients with MM showed that CPs were central to the optimization of therapy and adherence to treatment schedules and supportive medications. PRACTICE INNOVATION: The CP-led MM Clinic was established with a collaborative prescribing agreement (CPA) in 2022 at the National Center for Cancer Care and Research in Qatar and was the first of its kind in the Middle East and North Africa region. This CPA allowed CPs to issue refills for supportive medications and order required laboratory tests. EVALUATION METHODS: Data collected included the number of CP interventions, refills ordered by CPs, documentation of patient education, and medication reconciliations. The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed comparing ambulatory patients with MM treated before (2021) to those treated after the clinic implementation in 2022. RESULTS: The study population comprised 22 patients. A higher number of CPs interventions were documented post-clinic than preclinic (343 vs. 76, P = 0.004), with earlier initiation of bisphosphonate post-clinic (25 vs. 206 days, P = 0.008). There were also significant improvements in the introduction of risk appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (43% vs. 6%, P = 0.001) as well as vitamin D and calcium supplementation (100% vs. 68%, P = 0.02) post-clinic. Twenty-two medication refills for supportive medications and eight prechemotherapy laboratory investigations were ordered by CPs. CONCLUSION: The CP-led clinic provided a timely link to care optimization for ambulatory MM patients. This innovative CPA model implemented in the clinic could potentially be applied to different cancer settings to optimize safe and effective patient care.

Reprint of: Pharmacist-driven deprescribing initiative in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy, a broad term to describe the use of numerous and often unnecessary medications, has been connected to frailty, hospital admissions, falls, and even mortality. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed the VIONE (vital, important, optional, not indicated, and every medication has an indication) dashboard to identify patients with polypharmacy and serve as a framework for deprescribing of medications across VHA facilities where it is used in a variety of practice settings by different disciplines. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the implementation of a pharmacist-led, system-wide, deprescribing initiative in the primary care setting. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Interdisciplinary education was provided through academic detailing. Subsequently, patients were identified for inclusion in the project using the VIONE dashboard focusing on those at highest risk of polypharmacy and moving down to the lowest risk. Interested patients underwent a medication reconciliation. A clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) then contacted the patient to discuss potential deprescribing options. Recommendations were relayed to the primary care provider (PCP) for final approval and communicated to the patient by the pharmacy team. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Primary care CPPs (n = 3) integrated deprescribing into their standard workload. This service was implemented in the primary care setting across an entire health care system consisting of 16 different primary care teams. EVALUATION METHODS: The initiative's impact was measured by the number of discontinued medications, the acceptance rate of recommendations by the PCP, the potential annualized cost avoidance, and the number of patients referred to CPP medication management clinics. RESULTS: Among 63 patients, a total of 352 medications were deprescribed resulting in a potential annualized cost avoidance of $184,221. The acceptance rate of discontinuation recommendations was 96.7%. Subsequently, 25.4% of patients were referred to pharmacist-led clinics for disease state management. CONCLUSION: Embedding deprescribing into standard CPP workflow within the primary care setting facilitated a way for polypharmacy reduction and allowed the expansion of pharmacy-led services at VA Butler Healthcare System.

Patient-perceived understanding of home-going medication with transitions of care services at a pediatric institution.

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care (TOC) is the coordination and continuity of health care as a patient transfers between different settings. This can include a wide range of services, such as medication reconciliation, patient counseling, bedside delivery of medications, and others that meet individual patient needs. In the pediatric population, patients are at increased risk of potential medication errors and subsequent harm owing to reduced patient and caregiver health literacy, limited dosage form availability, and errors in medication administration. The use of TOC services at the time of hospital discharge in this population has the potential to make a positive impact on patient safety and the treatment of medical conditions. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether patient-perceived understanding of home-going medications was greater in patients and/or caregivers who received medication bedside delivery and education from a pharmacy-led TOC service at a large pediatric academic medical center. The secondary objective was to determine whether the primary practice area of the pharmacist providing medication education led to changes in understanding of home-going medication(s). METHODS: Using institution-wide, patient satisfaction surveys from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, patient and caregiver responses were queried for 2 questions about home-going medications, relating to the understanding of administration and the potential adverse effects. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on TOC services received, as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Survey responses for each of the 2 questions were categorized as top-box percentage by study group. Hypothesis testing between study groups for the primary and secondary outcomes were conducted using chi-squared tests at an alpha of 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Of the 1159 patients included in the study, 441 received TOC services, deemed the intervention group, and 718 did not receive TOC services, deemed the control group. When the intervention and control group were asked about understanding of medication administration, 96.37% versus 93.18% of patients (P = 0.007) gave the most favorable response of "yes, definitely," respectively. Furthermore, 78.51% versus 77.44% of patients (P = 0.053) gave the most favorable response when asked about understanding potential medication adverse effects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving TOC services by a member of the pharmacy team had a greater score for understanding of both medication administration and adverse effects. Furthermore, this greater score was consistent among the education provided by the inpatient and outpatient pharmacist.

A clinical-pharmaceutical medication reconciliation with patient interview for a medication review to identify drug-related problems in elective patients during hospital admission.

Background and aim: Drug-related problems (DRPs), e.g.drug-drug interactions (DDI), can lead to adversedrug reactions (ADRs) and thus complications during hospitalization. For this reason, such DRP, DDI and ADR should be identified and characterized as early as possible during hospital admission. We aimed to perform a clinical-pharmaceutical medication reconciliation in which patient-related information was collected and compared to drug-related information in a medication review. Investigations: During a 24-week-period, we consecutively invited patients electively admitted to Urology, Otolaryngology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, General and Visceral Surgery, and Oncology Departments of a 300-bed hospital. A clinical pharmacist performed a patient interview asking for medication, ADR, and adherence. The medication reconciliation considered packages for a brown-bag analysis, medication lists, and data from the clinical information-system (CIS). In a medication review, we matched patient-related information to drug-related information from the drug label, guidelines, drug-databases and websites to identify DRPs. Results: In the study, 356 patients (median age: 58 years) taking 1,712 drugs participated. Of all patients, 7.3% reported ADR and 10.7% missing adherence. 5.3% brought packages that enabled a brown-bag analysis and 21.1% a medication list. In 76.7% of patients, information from CIS was incomplete or not up-to-date. Among the most frequently identified DRPs were "Medication without diagnosis" (31.2%) and "Inappropriate timing of administration" (11.5%). The proportion of patients affected by severe DDI ranged from 0.8%-16.6%, depending on the drug information source. Conclusions: Incomplete patient data, frequently identified DRPs and inconsistent drug-based information make pharmaceutical involvement in medication reconciliation on admission a necessity.

A comprehensive study of prescribing, administering and drug handling medication errors in ten wards of a university hospital after implementation of electronic prescribing, clinical pharmacists or medication reconciliation.

Background and aim: Medication errors lead to preventable risks. Preventing strategies such as e-prescribing, clinical pharmacists and medication reconciliation have been implemented in recent years. However, information on long-term medication error rates in routine procedures is missing. Investigations: We aimed to identify predefined medication errors in ten wards of a university hospital where e-prescribing, clinical pharmacists and medication reconciliation have been partially implemented. Patient files were reviewed and routine processes were monitored for drug prescription errors (missing, unclear, outdated information), administration errors (wrong dispensed drugs) and drug handling errors (no light-, moisture-protection, wrong splitting, no separation of drugs, which ought to be taken by an empty stomach). Results: We analyzed 959 prescriptions with 933 solid peroral drugs for 182 patients (98 female, median age 66.5 years [Q25-Q75: 56-78 years]; the median number of drugs was 5 [Q25-Q75: 3-7]). The most frequent prescription error was a not specified drug form (91.1%). The most common administration error was a not adequately provided release dose formulation (72.7%). The lack of light protection for observed photosensitive drugs was the most frequent drug handling error (100%). We found a significantly higher amount of complete drug prescriptions with one of the implemented measurements e-prescribing, medication reconciliation and clinical pharmacists (Fisher's exact test two tailed, each p<0.001; CI 95%). Drug administration errors and drug handling errors were not significantly improved. Among the most frequently involved drug were drugs for acid-related disorders, immunosuppressant, and antineoplastic drugs. Conclusions: In the nearly 1,000 prescriptions and drugs analyzed, medication errors were still common. Various preventive strategies had been implemented in recent years, positively influencing the predefined errors rates.