Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 242: 145-151.e1, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on the neonatology workforce, focusing on professional and domestic workloads. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed US neonatologists in December 2020 regarding the impact of COVID-19 on professional and domestic work during the pandemic. We estimated associations between changes in time spent on types of professional and domestic work and demographic variables with multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Two-thirds (67.6%) of the 758 participants were women. Higher proportions of women than men were in the younger age group (63.3% vs 29.3%), held no leadership position (61.4% vs 46.3%), had dependents at home (68.8% vs 56.3%), did not have a partner or other adult at home (10.6% vs 3.2%), and had an employed partner (88.1% vs 64.6%) (P < .01 for all). A higher proportion of women than men reported a decrease in time spent on scholarly work (35.0% vs 29.0%; P = .02) and career development (44.2% vs 34.9%; P < .01). A higher proportion of women than men reported spending more time caring for children (74.2% vs 55.8%; P < .01). Reduced time spent on career development was associated with younger age (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.20-4.08) and number of dependents (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45). Women were more likely to report an increase in time spent time doing domestic work (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.19) and a reduction in time on self-care (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 significantly impacts the neonatology workforce, disproportionately affecting younger, parent, and women physicians. Targeted interventions are needed to support postpandemic career recovery and advance physician contributions to the field.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gender Role , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Professional Role , Puerto Rico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 108(1): 94-100, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29889988

ABSTRACT

AIM: We surveyed whether clinicians used the WhatsApp messaging application to view neonatal chest radiographs and asked a sub-sample to compare them with computer screen viewings. METHODS: The study was conducted at three university-affiliated medical centres in Israel from June-December 2016. Questionnaires on using smartphones for professional purposes were completed by 68/71 paediatric residents and 20/28 neonatologists. In addition, 11 neonatologists viewed 20 chest radiographs on a computer screen followed by a smartphone and 10 viewed the same radiographs in the opposite order, separated by a washout period of 2 months. After another 2 months, five from each group viewed the same radiographs on a computer screen. Different interpretations between viewing modes were assessed. RESULTS: Most respondents used WhatsApp to send chest radiographs for consultation: 82% of the paediatric residents and 80% of the neonatologists. The mean number of inconsistencies in diagnosis was 3.7/20 between two computer views and 2.9/20 between computer and smartphone views (p = 0.88) and the disease severity means were 3.7/20 and 2.85/20, respectively (p = 0.94). Neonatologists using WhatsApp only determined umbilical line placement in 80% of cases. CONCLUSION: WhatsApp was reliable for preliminary interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs, but caution was needed when assessing umbilical lines.


Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Smartphone/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Academic Medical Centers , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Information Dissemination/methods , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Israel , Male , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 55(7): 844-850, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30565771

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the use of oral dextrose gel to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia in New Zealand (NZ), to identify barriers and enablers to the implementation of the guideline and to determine if there is variation in management between clinical disciplines caring for at-risk babies. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to clinicians (including doctors, midwives and nurses) caring for babies with neonatal hypoglycaemia via stakeholders and maternity hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 251 clinicians from all 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) completed the survey. Of the responding clinicians, 148 (59%) from 15 (75%) DHBs reported oral dextrose gel use in their hospital, and of these, 129 (87%) reported a local guideline. In 12 of 15 (80%) DHBs, oral dextrose gel could be prescribed by midwives. For a clinical scenario of a baby with neonatal hypoglycaemia, doctors were more likely to prescribe oral dextrose gel than midwives (odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.9 (2.2-3.8), P < 0.0001). Of 32 possible combinations of treatment options for this scenario, 31 were selected by one or more clinicians. A guideline was perceived to be the most useful enabler, and availability of oral dextrose gel was seen as the most important barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Oral dextrose gel is widely used to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia in NZ. Increasing availability of dextrose gel and the clinical practice guideline are likely to further increase the use of oral dextrose gel.


Subject(s)
Glucose/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Administration, Oral , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gels , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Maternity , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , New Zealand , Nurses, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
4.
Telemed J E Health ; 25(9): 775-780, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30394853

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Outcomes for premature and critically ill neonates are improved with care provided by neonatologists in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). For smaller hospitals, maintaining the personnel and equipment necessary for the delivery and care of unexpectedly high-risk neonates is a significant challenge. To address this disparity in access, telemedicine has been increasingly used to support providers, patients, and their families in community newborn nurseries and NICUs. The purpose of this review is to present the current state of the use of telemedicine by regional NICUs to support community newborn nurseries, NICUs, and families. Methods: A literature review was conducted by two independent reviewers. Articles were selected for inclusion if they described the use of telemedicine with neonates or in the NICU. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the articles using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools. Results: Fourteen articles were identified. After consensus discussion, eight of the articles were rated good and six were rated fair by the two reviewers. Many of the articles suggested improvements in quality of care, family satisfaction, and reductions in the cost of care. Unfortunately, a majority of the studies to date have had small sample sizes or were performed in a single institution and lacked robust evaluations of patient- and family-centered outcomes and provider decision making. Conclusions: While these early studies are promising, more robust studies involving more patients and more institutions are needed to identify opportunities where telemedicine can impact health outcomes, patient-centeredness, or costs of care of neonates.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Female , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Male , Specialization/statistics & numerical data , United States
5.
J Pediatr ; 197: 109-115.e1, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29571927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether neonatologists show implicit racial and/or socioeconomic biases and whether these are predictive of recommendations at extreme periviability. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide survey using a clinical vignette of a woman in labor at 232/7 weeks of gestation asked physicians how likely they were to recommend intensive vs comfort care. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 versions of the vignette in which racial and socioeconomic stimuli were varied, followed by 2 implicit association tests (IATs). RESULTS: IATs revealed implicit preferences favoring white (mean IAT score = 0.48, P < .001) and greater socioeconomic status (mean IAT score = 0.73, P < .001). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that physicians with implicit bias toward greater socioeconomic status were more likely than those without bias to recommend comfort care when presented with a patient of high socioeconomic status (P = .037). No significant effect was seen for implicit racial bias. CONCLUSIONS: Building on previous demonstrations of unconscious racial and socioeconomic biases among physicians and their predictive validity, our results suggest that unconscious socioeconomic bias influences recommendations when counseling at the limits of viability. Physicians who display a negative socioeconomic bias are less likely to recommend resuscitation when counseling women of high socioeconomic status. The influence of implicit socioeconomic bias on recommendations at periviability may influence neonatal healthcare disparities and should be explored in future studies.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Prejudice/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
6.
Acta Paediatr ; 107(10): 1710-1715, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603788

ABSTRACT

AIM: American guidelines suggest that neonatal resuscitation be considered at 23 weeks of gestation, one week earlier than in the Netherlands, but how counselling practices differ at the threshold of viability is unknown. This pilot study compared prenatal periviability counselling in the two countries. METHODS: In 2013, a cross-sectional survey was sent to 121 Dutch neonatologists as part of a nationwide evaluation of prenatal counselling. In this pilot study, the same survey was sent to a convenience sample of 31 American neonatologists in 2014. The results were used to compare the organisation, content and decision-making processes in prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation between the two countries. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 17 (55%) American and 77 (64%) Dutch neonatologists. American neonatologists preferred to meet with parents more frequently, for longer periods of time, and to discuss more intensive care topics, including long-term complications, than Dutch neonatologists. Neonatologists from both countries preferred shared decision-making when deciding whether to initiate intensive care. CONCLUSION: Neonatologists in the United States and the Netherlands differed in their approach to prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation. Cross-cultural differences may play a role.


Subject(s)
Counseling/standards , Decision Making , Fetal Viability , Neonatologists/psychology , Neonatology/standards , Adult , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 35(1): 1-9, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28709164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 40 to 70% of critically ill neonatal intensive care admissions. This study explored the differences in perceptions and practice variations among neonatologists and pediatric nephrologists in diagnostic criteria, management, and follow-up of neonatal AKI. METHODS: A survey weblink was emailed to nephrologists and neonatologists in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, India, and the United States. Questions consisted of demographic and unit practices, three clinical scenarios assessing awareness of definitions of neonatal AKI, knowledge, management, and follow-up practices. RESULTS: Many knowledge gaps among neonatologists, and to a lesser extent, pediatric nephrologists were identified. Neonatologists were less likely to use categorical definitions of neonatal AKI (p < 0.00001) or diagnose stage 1 AKI (p < 0.00001) than pediatric nephrologists. Guidelines for creatinine monitoring for nephrotoxic medications were reported by 34% (aminoglycosides) and 62% (indomethacin) of respondents. Nephrologists were more likely to consider follow-up after AKI than neonatologists (p < 0.00001). Also, 92 and 86% of neonatologists and nephrologists, respectively, reported no standardization or infrastructure for long-term renal follow-up. CONCLUSION: Neonatal AKI is underappreciated, particularly among neonatologists. A lack of evidence on neonatal AKI contributes to this variation in response. Therefore, dissemination of current knowledge and areas for research should be the priority.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Nephrologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Australia , Canada , Dialysis , Female , Humans , India , Infant, Newborn , Male , New Zealand , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
8.
Ir Med J ; 111(1): 671, 2018 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29869852

ABSTRACT

Sagittal synostosis (SS) is the commonest form of craniosynostosis. Children with sagittal synostosis in Ireland are treated in the National Paediatric Craniofacial Centre (NPCC) in Temple Street Children's University Hospital. This retrospective study analysed the correlation between referral patterns to the unit and age at operation. The notes of 81 patients referred over a 5-year period (April 2008 - April 2013) to the NPCC with non-syndromic SS were reviewed and demographics and referral information were recorded. Of 81 patients reviewed, 60 (74%) were referred before 6 months of age, while 21 (26%) had late referrals. Neonatologists referred 100% of infants before 6 months, paediatricians referred 71%, and GPs 64%. Later referral was associated with a more complex referral pathway, including multiple-steps of referral and unnecessary investigations. Improved clinician knowledge and emphasis on the importance of early referral may lead to a reduction in late referrals.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Ireland , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Pediatr ; 181: 208-212.e4, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27814911

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To survey neonatologists as to how many use population-based outcomes data to counsel families before and after the birth of 22- to 25-week preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous online survey was distributed to 1022 neonatologists in the US. Questions addressed the use of population-based outcome data in prenatal and postnatal counseling. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of neonatologists reported using population-based outcomes data for counseling. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Outcomes Data is most commonly used (65%) with institutional databases (14.5%) the second choice. Most participants (89%) reported that these data influence their counseling, but it was less clear whether specific estimates of mortality and morbidity influenced families; 36% of neonatologist felt that these data have little or no impact on families. Seventy-one percent reported that outcomes data estimates confirmed their own predictions, but among those who reported having their assumptions challenged, most had previously been overly pessimistic. Participants place a high value on gestational age and family preference in counseling; however, among neonatologists in high-volume centers, the presence of fetal complications was also reported to be an important factor. A large portion of respondents reported using prenatal population-based outcomes data in the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainty about their value and impact, neonatologists use population-based outcomes data and provide specific estimates of survival and morbidity in consultation before and after extremely preterm birth. How best to integrate these data into comprehensive, family-centered counseling of infants at the margin of viability is an important area of further study.


Subject(s)
Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Gestational Age , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Neonatology
10.
Acta Paediatr ; 106(11): 1772-1779, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28695691

ABSTRACT

AIM: Therapeutic hypothermia is standard of care in term infants with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). The goal of this survey was to explore the attitudes of U.S. neonatologists caring for infants with HIE who fall outside of current guidelines. METHODS: Case-based survey administered to members of the Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine of the American Academy of Pediatrics. RESULTS: A total of 447 responses were analysed, a response rate of 19%. We found significant variability amongst U.S. neonatologists with regard to the use of therapeutic hypothermia for infants with HIE who fall outside standard inclusion criteria. Scenarios with the most variability included HIE in a late preterm infant and HIE following a postnatal code. Provision of therapeutic hypothermia outside of standard guidelines was not influenced by number of years in practice, neonatal intensive care type (NICU) or NICU size. CONCLUSION: Significant variability in practice exists when caring for infants with HIE who do not meet standard inclusion criteria, emphasizing the need for continued and rigorous research in this area.


Subject(s)
Hypothermia, Induced , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/therapy , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatology/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
11.
Acta Paediatr ; 106(3): 416-422, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27743483

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to survey paediatricians, who taught neonatal resuscitation in Brazil, about when they would apply advanced resuscitation in the delivery room for newborn infants born at 23-26 weeks of gestational age. METHODS: This cross-sectional study focused on an electronic questionnaire that was sent to paediatricians who acted as instructors for the Brazilian Neonatal Resuscitation Program from December 2011 to September 2013. The primary outcome was the gestational age at which the respondent would apply advanced resuscitation in the delivery room. Latent class analysis identified the profiles of the instructors, and logistic regression identified the variables associated with belonging to one of the derived classes. RESULTS: The 560 (82%) instructors who agreed to participate fell into three latent classes: pro-resuscitation, intermediate and pro-limitation, with high, intermediate and low probabilities of performing advanced resuscitation in neonates born at 23-26 weeks. In the multivariate model, group membership was associated with the paediatrician's age, years of practice and personal importance of religion and the patient's birthweight, future quality of life and probability of death. CONCLUSION: The opinions of paediatricians performing advanced resuscitation on extremely preterm infants in the delivery room were diverse and influenced by personal beliefs.


Subject(s)
Neonatologists/psychology , Resuscitation/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Neonatologists/standards , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Resuscitation/standards , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Resuscitation Orders , Statistics as Topic
12.
J Perinat Med ; 45(9): 1031-1038, 2017 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28130958

ABSTRACT

Ventilation practices have changed significantly since the initial reports in the mid 1980 of successful use of permissive hypercapnia and spontaneous ventilation [often called gentle ventilation (GV)] in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). However, there has been little standardization of these practices or of the physiologic limits that define GV. We sought to ascertain among Diaphragmatic Hernia Research and Exploration; Advancing Molecular Science (DHREAMS) centers' GV practices in the neonatal management of CDH. Pediatric surgeons and neonatologists from DHREAMS centers completed an online survey on GV practices in infants with CDH. The survey gathered data on how individuals defined GV including ventilator settings, blood gas parameters and other factors of respiratory management. A total of 87 respondents, from 12 DHREAMS centers completed the survey for an individual response rate of 53% and a 92% center response rate. Approximately 99% of the respondents defined GV as accepting higher carbon dioxide (PCO2) and 60% of the respondents also defined GV as accepting a lower pH. There was less consensus about the use of sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents in GV, both within and across the centers. Acceptable pH and PCO2 levels are broader than the goal ranges. Despite a lack of formal standardization, the results suggest that GV practice is consistently defined as the use of permissive hypercapnia with mild respiratory acidosis and less consistently with the use of sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents. GV is the reported practice of surveyed neonatologists and pediatric surgeons in the respiratory management of infants with CDH.


Subject(s)
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Am J Perinatol ; 34(8): 787-794, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28192814

ABSTRACT

Background Neonatologists have varying counseling practices for women with threatened periviable pregnancies. Previous research has suggested this variability may be influenced by social and economic factors of the mother. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the relative influence of maternal factors in counseling recommendations for periviable pregnancies. Methods A national cohort of neonatologists was sent a web-based survey. Five maternal characteristics were varied across eight vignettes: age, education, race, parity, and pregnancy "intendedness." Following each vignette, participants reported their likelihood to recommend full resuscitation versus comfort care. Conjoint analysis was used to assess the relative influence of each factor on respondents' recommendations. Results Responses from 328 neonatologists were included. Of the five tested maternal characteristics, parity and intendedness had the highest importance scores (40.2 and 35.0), followed by race, education, and age. If parents requested resuscitation, respondents were highly likely to comply with preferences, with little variation across vignettes. Conclusion Fetal-specific factors such as gestational age and estimated weight are known to influence counseling and decision making for extremely preterm infants. Our results suggest that maternal factors may also influence counseling practices, although physicians are likely to comply with parental preferences regardless of maternal factors. Future research should identify how maternal characteristics impact actual counseling practices.


Subject(s)
Counseling/methods , Fetal Viability , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Patient Comfort/methods , Pregnant Women/psychology , Prenatal Care , Resuscitation , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Decision Making , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Male , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/psychology , Reproductive History , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors
14.
Acta Paediatr ; 105(9): 1061-6, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27228325

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study determined current international clinical practice and opinions regarding initial fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) and pulse oximetry (SpO2 ) targets for delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants of less than 29 weeks of gestation. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated to neonatal clinicians via established professional clinical networks using a web-based survey programme between March 9 and June 30, 2015. RESULTS: Of the 630 responses from 25 countries, 60% were from neonatologists. The majority (77%) would target SpO2 between the 10th to 50th percentiles values for full-term infants. The median starting FiO2 was 0.3, with Japan using the highest (0.4) and the UK using the lowest (0.21). New Zealand targeted the highest SpO2 percentiles (median 50%). Most respondents agreed or did not disagree that a trial was required that compared the higher FiO2 of 0.6 (83%), targeting the 50th SpO2 percentile (60%), and the lower FiO2 of 0.21 (80%), targeting the 10th SpO2 percentile (78%). Most (65%) would join this trial. Many considered that evidence was lacking and further research was needed. CONCLUSION: Clinicians currently favour lower SpO2 targets for preterm resuscitation, despite acknowledging the lack of evidence for benefit or harm, and 65% would join a clinical trial.


Subject(s)
Asphyxia Neonatorum/therapy , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Resuscitation , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Pediatr Int ; 57(4): 639-44, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: If their own mother's milk (OMM) is not available, another mother's milk may be used for extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) infants. Human milk is a bodily fluid, however, therefore we have assumed that other mother's milk is currently seldom given to infants despite its superiority to formula. Although the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics have recommended using donor human milk (DHM) from a human milk bank (HMB) in the case that OMM is not available, there is no HMB in Japan. To assess whether other mother's milk is used for ELBW infants and whether an HMB is necessary in Japan, we surveyed neonatal intensive care units (NICU) via questionnaire. METHODS: The questionnaire was sent by email to members of the Japanese Neonatologist Association who are responsible for NICU. RESULTS: In total, 126 completed questionnaires (70.7%) were returned and analyzed. One-fourth of NICU give other mother's milk to ELBW infants. The first choice of nutrition is OMM, but other mother's milk or formula is given to infants at 19% of NICU if OMM is unavailable. Approximately three-fourths of NICU would like an HMB. CONCLUSION: Although human milk contains contagious agents and authorities do not recommend giving other mother's milk as a substitute for OMM, other mother's milk is still a choice in NICU in Japan. Many neonatologists, however, would prefer a safer alternative, that is, DHM obtained from an accredited HMB. A well-regulated HMB should be established and safe DHM should be available for all preterm infants if necessary.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/trends , Milk Banks/statistics & numerical data , Milk, Human , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Child , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Japan
16.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 106(6): 596-602, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33927001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Decisions about treatments for extremely preterm infants (EPIs) born in the 'grey zone' of viability can be ethically complex. This 2020 survey aimed to determine views of UK neonatal staff about thresholds for treatment of EPIs given a recently revised national Framework for Practice from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine. METHODS: The online survey requested participants indicate the lowest gestation at which they would be willing to offer active treatment and the highest gestation at which they would withhold active treatment of an EPI at parental request (their lower and upper thresholds). Relative risks were used to compare respondents' views based on profession and neonatal unit designation. Further questions explored respondents' conceptual understanding of viability. RESULTS: 336 respondents included 167 consultants, 127 registrars/fellows and 42 advanced neonatal nurse practitioners (ANNPs). Respondents reported a median grey zone for neonatal resuscitation between 22+1 and 24+0 weeks' gestation. Registrars/fellows were more likely to select a lower threshold at 22+0 weeks compared with consultants (Relative Risk (RR)=1.37 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.74)) and ANNPs (RR=2.68 (95% CI 1.42 to 5.06)). Those working in neonatal intensive care units compared with other units were also more likely to offer active treatment at 22+0 weeks (RR=1.86 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.94)). Most participants understood a fetus/newborn to be 'viable' if it was possible to survive, regardless of disability, with medical interventions accessible to the treating team. CONCLUSION: Compared with previous studies, we found a shift in the reported lower threshold for resuscitation in the UK, with greater acceptance of active treatment for infants <23 weeks' gestation.


Subject(s)
Fetal Viability/physiology , Gestational Age , Infant Care , Infant, Extremely Premature , Palliative Care , Resuscitation , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant Care/ethics , Infant Care/methods , Infant Care/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Male , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Nurses, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/ethics , Palliative Care/psychology , Resuscitation/ethics , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/psychology , Resuscitation Orders/ethics , Resuscitation Orders/psychology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
17.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 93(3): 161-169, 2020 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies regarding necrotising enterocolitis in Spain and to identify the strengths, areas of further improvement, and future research lines. METHODS: Two questionnaires on the management of preterm infants less than 32 weeks, at risk of, or with diagnosed necrotising enterocolitis, were distributed among selected representatives of the surgeons and neonatologists of the Spanish Neonatal Network (SEN1500) participant hospitals with a Paediatric Surgery Department. RESULTS: Percentage of response was 77.1% of contacted surgeons and 88.6% of neonatologists. There is a written protocol on the diagnosis and medical management of necrotising enterocolitis in 52% of the hospitals, and as regards surgical treatment in 33%. There is wide access to donor bank milk and to staff dedicated to breastfeeding promotion (87%). On the contrary, only 52% of the centres perform delayed cord clamping, and probiotics are used in just 23%. The use of abdominal ultrasound is increasing. There are no large differences as regards duration of antibiotic use and bowel rest, whereas there was as regards antibiotic selection, surgical indication, and type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: As regards prevention, delayed cord clamping and extended access to donor milk are two possible aspects of further improvement. The observed discrepancies noted in diagnostic and therapeutic aspects are common in precisely the areas where evidence in the literature is weakest.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/therapy , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Milk Banks/supply & distribution , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Spain
18.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235363, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There are differences in the adoption rates of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) worldwide. We aimed to describe and analyze the process of LISA introduction at the country level. METHODS: A standardized training program (33 courses covering >500 neonatologists) was followed by a cohort study. Data regarding consecutive LISA procedures were acquired over 12 months in 31 tertiary neonatal centers, using a dedicated on-line platform. RESULTS: Of 500 LISA procedures, 75% were performed by specialists and 25% by residents. The mean percentage share of LISA in all surfactant therapies was 24%, which represents a 6-fold increase compared to previous years. After 12 months, 76% of the procedures were rated "easy/very easy" vs 59% at baseline (p<0.05). Surfactant re-treatment rate was 15%. Twenty-three percent of infants required mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life. Oxygen desaturation and surfactant reflux were the most frequent complications. Unlike previous reports describing exclusive use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) during LISA, majority of procedures (63%) were carried out using nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP). Efficacy of LISA with NIPPV or BiPAP was not significantly different from that with nCPAP (22.4% vs 24.5% of cases requiring intubation). Ventilation was provided with nasal cannulas or nasal masks (90%) and rarely with "RAM" cannulas or nasopharyngeal tubes. Rigid catheters were preferred (88.4%); tracheal insertion was successful at first attempt in 87% of cases. Majority of infants (79%) received no premedication prior to the procedure and almost all were given caffeine citrate. Median time of instillation was 1.5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The LISA procedure does not appear to be technically difficult to master. Training combining theory with practical exercises is an efficient implementation strategy. Variations in adoption rates indicate the need for additional, more personalized teachings in some centers.


Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Positive-Pressure Respiration/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Surfactants/administration & dosage , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Male , Neonatologists/education , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Poland , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Prospective Studies
19.
Ital J Pediatr ; 45(1): 131, 2019 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31640752

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatologist performed echocardiography (NPE) has increasingly been used to assess the hemodynamic status in neonates. Aim of this survey was to investigate the utilization of NPE in Italian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS: We conducted an on-line survey from June to September 2017. A questionnaire was developed by the Italian neonatal cardiology study group and was sent to each Italian NICU. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. In 94% of Italian NICUs functional echocardiography was used by neonatologists, cardiologists or both (57, 15 and 28% respectively). All the respondents used NPE in neonates with patent ductus arteriosus and persistent pulmonary hypertension, 93% in neonates with hypotension or shock, 85% in neonates with perinatal asphyxia, 78% in suspicion of cardiac tamponade, and 73% for line positioning. In 30% of center, there was no NPE protocol. Structural echocardiography in stable and critically ill neonates was performed exclusively by neonatologists in 46 and 36% of center respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NPE is widely used in Italian NICUs by neonatologists. Structural echocardiography is frequently performed by neonatologists. Institutional protocols for NPE are lacking. There is an urgent need of a formal training process and accreditation to standardize the use of NPE.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
J Perinatol ; 39(5): 690-696, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914779

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical approach used by neonatologists for diagnosis of congenital/perinatal infections (CPI); no such data currently exist. STUDY DESIGN: A national survey regarding the diagnosis of toxoplasma, syphilis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in neonates. RESULT: We received 553 (11%) responses. Central nervous system calcification or hydrocephalus was the commonest trigger to pursue a CPI diagnosis (98%); maternal history was the least frequent (67%). Four hundred twenty-two (76%) used general screening such as "TORCH titer screen" (57%) or total IgG or IgM (39%). Further evaluation targeted known clinical sequelae; but cerebrospinal fluid testing was used in only 65% of those suspected of having HSV or syphilis. Fifty-six percent chose a treponemal instead of a non-treponemal test for syphilis. Multivariable analyses did not identify factors associated with the clinical diagnostic approach. CONCLUSION: We observed clinically important deviations from CPI diagnostic test recommendations in a national cohort of neonatologists.


Subject(s)
Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Decision-Making , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Herpes Simplex/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pregnancy , Rubella/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syphilis/diagnosis , Toxoplasmosis, Congenital/diagnosis , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL