ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) and hemodynamic consultation have typically been performed by physicians. The Stollery Children's Hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) expanded their TNE training program to include neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs), the first in North America. PURPOSE: This study examines the thoughts and perceptions of clinicians about the incorporation of NNPs providing TNE and hemodynamic consultation and investigates key facilitators and challenges for consideration when planning future training, expansion of service in Edmonton, or beyond. METHODS: In this descriptive study using qualitative methodology, purposive sampling was used to invite NICU clinicians to participate. Using a semistructured topic guide, a focus group and 2 individual interviews were conducted. RESULTS: Participants were supportive of NNPs. Advantages included increased access to service, acquisition and retention of skills, provision of patient-centered care, and leveraged interpersonal relationships in the decision-making process. Key aspects of program expansion included climate and culture of the NICU, presence of adequate patient volume, and resources to support training. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Support across disciplines and the collaborative working nature of the NICU are key factors in the success of the program's development and implementation. Benefits of having NNPs on the TNE team were clearly expressed. Benefits to the health system included rapid access to hemodynamic information allowing for care based on specific pathophysiology and additional local capacity to perform TNE and reducing demand on other trained providers. Additional research could consider parental views of NNPs performing TNE and hemodynamic consultation as well as the accuracy of diagnosis between the NNPs and physician group.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Echocardiography , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Echocardiography/methods , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Patient Care Team , Qualitative Research , Female , Neonatal Nursing/methods , Neonatal Nursing/education , Male , Focus GroupsABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between advanced nurse practitioners' self-leadership and commitment to the workplace, work engagement and influence at work. BACKGROUND: The concept of self-leadership is particularly suited to ANPs, who are required to take responsibility for their work roles. An optimum balance between the ANPs' psychosocial work environment and self-leadership may positively impact work ability in this group and can be compromised by interactions between and among these variables. DESIGN: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted from July 2020 to August 2020 on 153 ANPs across a national health service. METHODS: The survey was distributed to respondents online. The revised self-leadership questionnaire was used to measure self-leadership, and three scales from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire were used to measure commitment to the workplace, work engagement and influence at work. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the association between self-leadership and the psychosocial variables. RESULTS: ANPs with high levels of self-leadership reported high levels of work engagement and commitment to the workplace. No relationship was found between self-leadership and influence at work. CONCLUSION: Improving self-leadership among ANPs by involving them in strategic leadership activities at an organizational level could be an effective strategy for optimizing the role and facilitating ANPs to contribute at an organizational level beyond the clinical interface. However, organizational support is required to ensure that ANPs practise to the full potential of their training and capability. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. IMPACT: This study provided new evidence of a relationship between ANPs' self-leadership and psychosocial factors. This study found that ANPs with high levels of self-leadership reported high levels of work engagement and commitment to the workplace. Policymakers and organizational leaders can optimize the ANP role and facilitate ANPs to contribute strategically to improve care systems. This study identifies a relationship between ANPs' self-leadership and specific psychosocial variables.
Subject(s)
Leadership , Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , State Medicine , Workplace , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of physician extenders (e.g., nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]) has risen in recent years in the U.S. health care domain, yet some scholars have questioned if physician extenders are being fully utilized in the health care field. PURPOSES: The purpose of this research was to conduct a systematic review to determine if trust in the NP/PA might be influential in the ways these professionals are utilized. We view trust through the lens of Mayer et al. and their model of organizational trust, and we seek to examine how patients, physicians, and NPs/PAs themselves view one another. METHODS: This systematic review spanned from 1996 to 2022 and applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses strategy. The final sample consisted of 29 articles. RESULTS: The findings point to how the antecedents of trust according to Mayer et al.; i.e., trustee's ability, benevolence, and integrity) influence the trusting relationships between patients and NPs/PAs and between physicians and NPs/PAs. Consequences and outcomes of trust are also discussed. Importantly, a trustor's propensity to trust and repeat interactions over time (e.g., feedback loop) is influential to trusting relationships. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings offer health care organizations insight into the mechanisms for building trust as physician extenders become more prominent in the health care field.
Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners , Physician Assistants , Trust , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Physician Assistants/psychology , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurse practitioners (NPs) can enhance NP care and improve access to care by autonomously managing their patient panels. Yet, its impact on workforce outcomes such as burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention remains unexplored. PURPOSE: To estimate the impact of NP panel management on workforce outcomes. METHODS: Structural equation modeling was conducted using survey data from 1,244 primary care NPs. NP panel management was categorized into co-managing patients with other providers, both co-managing and autonomously managing, and fully autonomous management. DISCUSSION: Fully autonomous management led to more burnout than co-managing (B = 0.089, bias-corrected 95% bootstrap confidence interval [0.028, 0.151]). Work hours partially (27%) mediated this relationship. This findings indicate that greater autonomy in panel management among NPs may lead to increased burnout, partially due to longer work hours. CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce work hours could help NPs deliver quality care without burnout.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Job Satisfaction , Nurse Practitioners , Personnel Turnover , Primary Health Care , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The U.S. health system is burdened by rising costs, workforce shortages, and unremitting burnout. Well-being interventions have emerged in response, yet data suggest that the work environment is the problem. Nurse practitioner (NP) burnout is associated with structural and relational factors in the work environment, practice autonomy, and hierarchical leadership. PURPOSE: We explore the unique social, cultural, and political environment in which NPs work through the lens of social ecology and present the Social Ecology of Burnout (SEB) framework. METHODS: We review current burnout frameworks in the context of the NP practice environment and discuss the SEB, specifically exploring psychological safety and its influence on burnout. FINDINGS: Psychological safety, work environment, and policy are presented within the SEB and solutions which empower NPs are considered. DISCUSSION: Our framework can serve as a guide for future nursing research, practice, and policy.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Leadership , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nursing Research , Social Environment , United States , Workplace/psychologyABSTRACT
AIM: To explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making in an emergency department environment is a complex process often occurring in times of crisis. It is an important aspect contributing to the quality of care. However, empirical research is limited regarding the decision-making process in different nursing roles. METHODS: In accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, a qualitative and observational study was conducted to explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Six Registered Nurses, six Nurse Specialists and six Nurse Practitioners were observed. A total of 40 hours of observation was made at each setting according to a structured observation guideline, followed by clarifying questions. The data material was analysed by means of a qualitative manifest and latent content analysis. RESULTS: Three themes arose: acting in accordance with routines, previous experience and intuition; considering patient experience; and facilitating new alternatives based on critical thinking. The Registered Nurses mainly used the first approach, the Nurse Specialists used the first and the second approaches, and the Nurse Practitioners used all three approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the differences in decision-making processes between these groups. Nurse Practitioners were the only group that facilitated and evaluated new alternatives using their clinical autonomy, such as stepping up and making independent and collaborative decision-making. IMPLICATION: The results can be used in countries developing advanced practice nursing education and defining their scope of practice to inform stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Finland , Female , Norway , Male , Ireland , Qualitative Research , Adult , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nurse Specialists , Emergency Service, Hospital , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychologyABSTRACT
AIM: To explore factors that influence the impact of nurse practitioners' clinical autonomy with a self-determining perspective. BACKGROUND: Worldwide, there is a significant demand for healthcare professionals such as the nurse practitioner in meeting some healthcare needs across patients' lifespans. Factors influencing nurse practitioners clinical autonomy can impact the full utilisation of the role in practice. INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists that describes or researches nurse practitioner clinical autonomy. Instead, there is a focus in the literature on strategic debates, role confusion and nurse practitioners reporting the straddling between nursing, allied heath professionals and medicine in the provision of healthcare services. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was used in a purposive sample in a national sample of nurse practitioners in Ireland across a full range of healthcare settings. Additionally, the survey included open comments sections to capture qualitative comments by the nurse practitioners themselves. METHODS: Self-determination theory is rooted in an organismic dialectical stance. This study used a convenience sample of n = 148 from a total sample of n = 448 (33%) of the population. The Dempster Practice Behavioural Scale and an initially validated advanced nursing practice clinical autonomy scale were used. Open comments were analysed by thematic analysis. STROBE Standards guidelines for cross-sectional studies were followed, and COREQ guidelines were followed for writing qualitative research. RESULTS: The study findings demonstrated that the more clinical experience the nurse practitioner had, the higher their levels of clinical autonomy. The previous length of nursing experience did not impact nurse practitioner clinical autonomy levels. However, average experience of nurse practitioner' in this study was 3-10 years. No significant differences existed between the reported gender, nurse practitioners' clinical autonomy and decision-making. 1:40 female and 1:9 male nurse practitioners undertook a doctorate or PhD-level education. No advanced nurse practitioner identified as non-binary. Gender and organisational culture considerations can influence nurse practitioners clinical autonomy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: This study highlights intrinsic motivators that support nurse practitioners in providing innovative healthcare: competence, relatedness and clinical autonomy. Countries credentialing, regulations professional standards and healthcare policy positively influence nurse practitioner clinical autonomy. Nurse practitioners' clinical autonomy is championed when health policy and organisational stakeholders intrinsically collaborate. A disconnect between health policy organisational culture extrinsically influences lower levels of nurse practitioners' clinical autonomy. CONCLUSION: The findings underline the positive impact of nurse practitioner clinical autonomy. A recommendation of this study is to continue to measure impact of clinical autonomy and develop nurse practitioners' self-determination strategies around the role and integrity of their levels of intrinsic clinical autonomy.
Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners , Nurse's Role , Professional Autonomy , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Nurse's Role/psychology , Ireland , Attitude of Health Personnel , Personal Autonomy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of the advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) within Hospital at Night (H@N) teams has emerged in line with the demands of the service and the needs of patients in the out-of-hours period. The majority of ANPs with H@N teams are recruited as trainees. There is a high volume of trainees needing support against a low number of experienced ANPs. Introduction of the clinical practice facilitator (CPF) role is one way of addressing these issues. Within this evaluative study of one H@N service, the CPFs are experienced ANPs who have received additional training in the delivery of practice assessment and learner feedback. AIM: To explore the experiences and perceptions of those trainee ANPs who have had or are currently receiving support and supervision from the CPFs in an H@N service in one Scottish NHS health board. METHOD: The CPFs undertook a service evaluation following introduction of the role. Purposive sampling was undertaken whereby a descriptive questionnaire was sent to 22 eligible participants. RESULTS: 16 questionnaires were returned. Qualitative data from the questionnaire generated several themes from the participants' responses: validation of competencies, supporting wellbeing, accessibility of support, designated prescribing practitioner role and support post-qualification. CONCLUSIONS: CPFs are ideally placed to meet the required needs of trainees. Organisational commitment is key to ensuring ANPs are in optimal positions to provide support and supervision for the next generation of trainees.
Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Nurse Practitioners/education , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Scotland , State Medicine , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nurse's Role , After-Hours Care , Attitude of Health PersonnelABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study investigates the expectations, perceptions, and gaps of the healthcare service quality (HSQ) from the patients' perspective, and explores the significant demographic and clinical factors associated with the HSQ in nurse practitioner practice (NPP). DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was carried out, with convenience sampling performed under the NPP in Taiwan, from June to November 2016. METHODS: The Nurse Practitioner Healthcare Service Quality Scale was used to assess the expectations, perceptions, and gaps of the HSQ. The demographics, clinical characteristics, and symptom severity of patients were collected, and the Importance-Performance Analysis was applied to identify the priority of ranking items for the improvement of nurse practitioners (NPs). The Generalized Estimating Equation was used to explore the factors associated with the HSQ in NPP. FINDINGS: A total of 200 patients completed the questionnaires. The results revealed that the patients had overall high expectations (M = 6.35, SD = 0.46), moderate perceptions (M = 4.21, SD = 0.95), and a mild HSQ gap (M = -2.14, SD = 0.69), with statistically significant differences (p < .001). In NPP, the largest gap in the HSQ dimensions was reliable responsiveness, followed by empathy, assurance, and tangibility. Patients with greater symptom severity and a longer in-hospital stay were associated with larger HSQ gaps; however, patients who were transferred from the emergency department had smaller gaps than those in the outpatient department. CONCLUSIONS: The patients' expectations were not fully satisfied in the NPP, especially for the dimensions of reliable responsiveness and empathy. The patients' symptom severity was a significant factor related to the gaps in the HSQ. The awareness of unmet needs, from the patients' perspective, could guide the convergence of a rational policy to promote healthcare delivery in the NPP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The managers of NPP need to pay attention to increasing NPs' reliable responsiveness and empathy, by setting the appropriate scope of practice, regulating the NP-to-patient ratio, applying for certification programs in prescribing training, and cultivating patient-centered care with shared decision making. In addition, building up the knowledge and competency of symptom management is also suggested for NP training.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Patients/psychology , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Empathy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse-Patient Relations , Patients/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , TaiwanABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients with pelvic floor disorders are growing in number. The aim of this study is to outline the main activities of a urotherapist, an advanced nurse practitioner, in the care of patients with pelvic floor disorders and to evaluate patient satisfaction with the service urotherapists provide. METHODS: The prospective single-center observational study was carried out from July 2016 to June 2018. Parameters used to assess the urotherapist activities included the number of consultations, type of counselling, time frame of consultations and therapy and patient satisfaction. In a subgroup of 38 patients, satisfaction with the urotherapy sessions was evaluated by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Totally, 1709 patients were examined by urogynecologists. Five hundred and fourteen (30%) with chronic pelvic floor disorders were subsequently referred to a urotherapist. Of these patients, 60% were at least 65 years old. The most common pelvic floor disorders (221 patients; 43%) were an overactive bladder, recurrent urinary tract infections, chronic cystitis and pelvic pain syndrome; the second most common pelvic floor disorder was pelvic organ prolapsed (151 patients; 29%). Of the study subgroup comprising 38 patients, 32 (84%) returned the patient satisfaction questionnaire. All 32 patients specified their level of agreement with the urotherapist's professional competence, empathy, temporal availability and quality of advice as "agree to strongly agree." CONCLUSIONS: Management by a urotherapist was highly appreciated. The role of the urotherapist as a care coordinator, their level of autonomy and barriers to the implementation in primary care requires further exploration.
Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pelvic Floor Disorders/rehabilitation , Urinary Incontinence/rehabilitation , Adult , Advanced Practice Nursing , Aged , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care , Pelvic Floor Disorders/epidemiology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurse practitioners (NPs) are increasingly employed by hospital medicine groups and contribute to the care of the hospitalized adult patient. Prior research indicates NP hospitalists are empowered in their role. PURPOSE: This national study describes the work experience of the NP hospitalist workforce. METHOD: A qualitative exploratory study using five focus group sessions with NP hospitalists is described using thematic analysis and synthesis of transcriptions. Inductive coding identified and further refined themes explained by NP hospitalist participants. FINDINGS: Psychological empowerment was reaffirmed as the overarching theme to describe the experience of NP hospitalists. Five subthemes of this empowerment emerged: collegiality, autonomy, role preparation, the road traveled, and pathfinder. DISCUSSION: Three main implications of the study include: the need for educational programs to align with practice; hospital bylaws require updating to support current practice; and the APRN Consensus Model does not fully reflect hospitalist roles.
Subject(s)
Empowerment , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Humans , Professional AutonomyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs have grown exponentially for the last 10 years across the United States. However, the intra-professional collaboration among DNP and PhD scholars is not clearly demonstrated in the literature as it relates to frequency, training models, and the outcomes of these collaborations on translation. The purposes of this paper are to: (1) examine the role for DNP nurses in symptom science research and (2) describe training models to cultivate the PhD-DNP collaboration to strengthen the translation of discoveries from nursing research, to facilitate implementation of discoveries, and to improve clinical practice of nurses. METHODS: A targeted review of the literature was conducted to identify, (1) the role of the DNP, (2) examples of PhD-DNP collaborations, (3) training models that support collaborations, and (4) the outcomes of these intra-professional collaborations. RESULTS: Two articles reported on PhD-DNP collaboration within a university setting; however, they did not address how the partnership was modeled. One additional article described an academic-hospital partnership model aimed at MSN-prepared advanced practice nurses (APRN) by which outcomes were measured. No examples were found outside of academic settings. The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) has established the Symptom Science Center (SSC) with an interest in training the next generation of symptom scientists. By developing a training curriculum through the NINR SSC, DNP-prepared students and practitioners can be exposed to the research enterprise and potentially develop early partnerships with PhD-prepared students and scholars that lead to research translation. CONCLUSION: The NINR Department of Intramural Research (DIR) and National Institutes of Health Clinical Center are dedicated to building stronger ties between PhD- and DNP-prepared scientists. The SSC can serve as an optimal platform to promote the collaboration of PhD and DNP nurses to advance symptom science translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurses have a remarkable role in early detection of disease progression. Training opportunities to cultivate the PhD-DNP collaboration have significant relevance for expediting the translation of nursing science to nursing practice.
Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/education , Interprofessional Relations , Nurse Practitioners/education , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurse's Role/psychology , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Nursing/psychology , Symptom Assessment , Adult , Curriculum , Education, Nursing, Graduate , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Research , Translational Research, Biomedical , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Clinical reasoning is a multi-faceted and complex construct, the understanding of which has emerged from multiple fields outside of healthcare literature, primarily the psychological and behavioural sciences. The application of clinical reasoning is central to the advanced non-medical practitioner (ANMP) role, as complex patient caseloads with undifferentiated and undiagnosed diseases are now a regular feature in healthcare practice. This article explores some of the key concepts and terminology that have evolved over the last four decades and have led to our modern day understanding of this topic. It also considers how clinical reasoning is vital for improving evidence-based diagnosis and subsequent effective care planning. A comprehensive guide to applying diagnostic reasoning on a body systems basis will be explored later in this series.
Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing , Clinical Reasoning , Nurse Practitioners , Thinking , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This is the final article in a series that examines the role of onboarding programs for new physician assistants (PAs) and NPs. On-the-job learning is highly relevant for this workforce. Here we examine the strategies organizations use to impart information and skills in onboarding programs. METHODS: In 2018, we interviewed 13 administrators of onboarding programs. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes by a team of researchers, with feedback from interviewees. RESULTS: Seven strategies were identified and are described in this article: Clinical mentoring, personal and professional mentoring, meeting with/shadowing other professionals, checking in by administrators, delivering didactic content, tailoring content or ramp-up, and assessing/ensuring competency. CONCLUSIONS: This article describes commonly used strategies in onboarding programs for PAs and NPs and can provide guidance to those designing their own onboarding programs. The programs we examined relied heavily on mentoring and other strategies appropriate for adult learners. Future work should evaluate the effectiveness of onboarding programs.
Subject(s)
Inservice Training/methods , Mentoring/methods , Nurse Practitioners/education , Physician Assistants/education , Primary Health Care , Clinical Competence , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Physician Assistants/psychology , Program Evaluation , Quality of Health Care , WorkforceABSTRACT
Catherine is an advanced nurse practitioner working in a large general practice in the north of England. She works alongside her medical colleagues and receives and treats patients with undifferentiated complaints. Marcelina is bringing 6-year-old Nathaniel to see her.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Emotional Abuse , Nurse Practitioners , Child , England , Female , General Practice , Humans , Male , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient (LCP) is a multidisciplinary tool developed for the dying phase for use in palliative care settings. The literature reports divergent experiences with its application in a nursing home setting related to its implementation and staff competencies. The aim of this study is to understand how the LCP is being used in the context of the nursing home, including for residents with dementia, and experienced from the perspectives of those responsible for medical treatment in nursing homes. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of a survey followed by interviews. A link to a 9-item online survey with closed and open-ended questions was emailed to all physicians and nurse practitioners of 33 care organisations with nursing homes in three regions of the Netherlands (North, West and South). In addition, 10 respondents with particularly positive or negative experiences were selected for semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 159 physicians and nurse practitioners. The respondents were very positive on the content and less positive on the use of the LCP, although they reported difficulties identifying the right time to start the LCP, especially in case of dementia. Also using the LCP was more complicated after the implementation of the electronic health record. The LCP was judged to be a marker of quality for the assessment of symptoms in the dying phase and communication with relatives. CONCLUSION: An instrument that prompts regular assessment of a dying person was perceived by those responsible for (medical) care to contribute to good care. As such, the LCP was valued, but there was a clear need to start it earlier than in the last days or hours of life, a need for a shorter version, and for integration of the LCP in the electronic health record. Regular assessments with an instrument that focusses on quality of care and good symptom control can improve palliative care for nursing home residents with and without dementia.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Perception , Physicians/psychology , Terminal Care/methods , Adult , Attitude to Death , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminal Care/psychology , Terminal Care/trendsABSTRACT
AIMS: To explore Advanced Nurse Practitioners' (ANP) (Emergency) perceptions of their role, positionality and professional identity. BACKGROUND: Advanced nursing practice was formally established in the Republic of Ireland in 2001 with 336 ANPs currently registered, projection increasing to a critical mass of 750 by 2021. Advanced practitioners (Emergency) give full emergency care for a specific cohort of clients with unscheduled, undifferentiated and undiagnosed conditions. DESIGN: Qualitative narrative inquiry using Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, field and capital as the theoretical framework was undertaken. METHODS: Data were collected in 10 in-depth interviews and thematic analysis applied. RESULTS: Five key themes emerged: participants' career pathways, personal and professional transitions, role dimensions and core concepts, and position in the organization and emergent professional identity. Role transitioning and a change in habitus, field and capital revealed the uniqueness of their nursing role. Minimizing waiting times, timely patient care and patient satisfaction were key performance indicators. A heightened awareness regarding higher-level decision-making, autonomy and accountability is integral to advanced practice. CONCLUSION: This study presents unique insights into the ANP role covering recruitment, organizational culture changes required and support to ease transition emerged. IMPACT: Better understanding the motivation to undertake the role, the transition experience and use of advanced practice skills sets will inform the targets for the future recruitment and retention of ANPs are met nationally and internationally. Dissatisfaction with previous management roles and wanting to be clinically close to patients were motivations to follow an advanced practice clinical career trajectory. Positionality and emergent professional identity are key enablers ensuring that advanced practitioners' roles demonstrate the attributes of advanced practice. Educators could use the findings to develop recruitment, retention and progression strategies. Disseminating the role and scopes of practice could positively influence collaborative models of service delivery and policy development.
Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/organization & administration , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurse's Role/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore professional mattering in a broad cohort of nurses. BACKGROUND: Mattering is a construct from social psychology that describes the feeling that one makes a difference in the lives of others and has significance in one's community. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey assessing mattering, meaning, social support, burnout, and engagement was administered to nurses and nurse practitioners working in various specialties in the United States. RESULTS: Higher levels of mattering at work were associated with lower burnout and higher engagement. Mattering was correlated with perceived social support from one's organization, supervisor, peers, and subordinates. Open-ended responses describing experiences of mattering at work included demonstrating professional competence, positive interactions with patients and interprofessional peers, and receiving recognition from one's organization. CONCLUSIONS: A perception of mattering at work is associated with lower levels of burnout. Our data suggest that affirming interactions with other healthcare team members promote a sense of mattering.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurses/psychology , Self Concept , Social Support , Work Engagement , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Middle Aged , United StatesABSTRACT
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To consider the relationship between professional nursing identity and advanced practice by exploring intra-professional relationships between advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) and nursing colleagues. BACKGROUND: Advanced nursing practice continues to develop internationally. Previous studies suggest advanced practice may lack support within nursing, which may lead to underutilisation, retention and patient safety issues. However, the relationship between the wider nursing profession and advanced practice is poorly understood and the theory that professional identity creates cultural barriers to advanced practice has received little empirical attention. DESIGN: Ethnographic methodology was used. METHODS: Fieldwork methods were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Participants were ANPs (n = 9) and nursing colleagues (n = 5) across two primary care general practice organisations. Data were analysed thematically using framework analysis, underpinned a priori by professional identity theories. Reporting was guided by COREQ. RESULTS: Three themes were identified which indicated how intra-professional relationships were conducted: Conciliating Nursing, where ANPs took responsibility for developing positive relationships with other nurses; Vertical Discounting, where nursing colleagues were dismissive and undermined ANPs, who themselves behaved similarly towards other nurses; and Lateral Othering, where ANPs undermined other ANPs. Vertical Discounting and Lateral Othering destabilised advanced practice. CONCLUSION: Intra-professional relationships, and the broader nursing profession, shape advanced practice. We theorise this is underpinned by threats to professional identity, while weak professional identity amongst even established advanced practitioners exacerbates lack of support. Highlighting these issues allows space to develop alternative strategies to negotiate intra-professional relationships, informed by professional identity theories, which support rather than inhibit advanced practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: As advanced practice expands throughout primary and secondary care, and across allied health professions, the impact of professional identity and relationships on health care will likely increase and the importance of strong advanced practice identity will become increasingly relevant.
Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Nurse's Role , Adult , Clinical Nursing Research , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into nurse practitioners' (NP) leadership roles in Dutch hospital care, by exploring the perceptions regarding their current leadership role and the differences with their previous role as a registered specialised nurse. BACKGROUND: To meet today's challenges of the increasing healthcare demands, the employment of NPs is proliferating. NPs have the ideal position to play a pivotal role within healthcare reforms, yet full expansion of their scope of practice and expertise is having limited success. Long-term sustainability of NPs depends on the ability to perform and develop a leading role. DESIGN AND METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted in fifteen Dutch hospitals. Data were collected from April-July 2018, and purposive sampling was used for eighteen semi-structured interviews. This study is conducted and reported according to the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: Three main themes concerning NPs' current leadership role emerged, and they were all linked to a successful positioning of NPs. All themes seemed to be of influence on NPs' scope of daily practice. Direct patient care was emphasised, and leadership on other levels appeared to be underused. Most NPs desired to reshape their profession. However, unprofitable use of their leadership skills especially on professional and organisational level and lack of supportive factors seemed to hinder them. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate use of leadership is crucial for role development and positioning of NPs. Further development of the NP profession can help to better differentiate between the tasks of registered specialised nurses and NPs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Leadership in nursing contributes to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of health care. Further positioning of the NP profession depends on a profitable use of leadership competencies. Besides, NPs should collaborate with healthcare organisations, educational institutions and professional associations to value the NP profession in the current healthcare system.