Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 67(4): 603-610, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805011

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Open abdomen therapy (OAT) is commonly used to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of OAT after rAAA from 2006 to 2021. Investigating data on resuscitation fluid, weight gain, and cumulative fluid balance could provide a more systematic approach to determining the timing of safe abdominal closure. METHODS: This was a single centre observational cohort study. The study included all patients treated for rAAA followed by OAT from October 2006 to December 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-two of the 244 patients who underwent surgery for rAAA received OAT. The mean age was 72 ± 7.85 years, and most were male (n = 61, 85%). The most frequent comorbidities were cardiac disease (n = 31, 43%) and hypertension (n = 31, 43%). Fifty-two patients (72%) received prophylactic OAT, and 20 received OAT for ACS (28%). There was a 25% mortality rate in the prophylactic OAT group compared with the 50% mortality in those who received OAT for ACS (p = .042). The 58 (81%) patients who survived until closure had a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 9, 16.5) days of OAT and 5 (IQR 4, 7) dressing changes. There was one case of colocutaneous fistula and two cases of graft infection. All 58 patients underwent successful abdominal closure, with 55 (95%) undergoing delayed primary closure. In hospital survival was 85%. Treatment trends over time showed the increased use of prophylactic OAT (p ≤ .001) and fewer ACS cases (p = .03) assessed by Fisher's exact test. In multivariable regression analysis fluid overload and weight reduction predicted 26% of variability in time to closure. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic OAT after rAAA can be performed safely, with a high rate of delayed primary closure even after long term treatment.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Aortic Rupture , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Surgical Mesh , Humans , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Male , Aged , Female , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/adverse effects , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/etiology , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/prevention & control , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Traction/adverse effects , Traction/methods , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Open Abdomen Techniques/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques/adverse effects , Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques/instrumentation , Fasciotomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL