ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is the primary treatment for patients with limited numbers of small brain metastases. Head fixation is usually performed with framed-based (FB) fixation; however, mask-based (MB) fixation has emerged as a less invasive alternative. A comparative meta-analysis between both approaches has not been performed. METHODS: Databases were searched until August 28th, 2023, to identify studies comparing MB and FB SRS in the treatment of brain metastases. Our outcomes of interest included local tumor control (LTC), radiation necrosis (RN), mortality, and treatment time (TT). Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and hazard ratio (HR) were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: From 295 articles initially identified, six studies (1 clinical trial) involving 509 patients were included. LTC revealed comparable RR at 6-months (RR = 0.95[95%CI = 0.89-1.01], p = 0.12) and a marginal benefit in FB SRS at 1-year (RR = 0.87[95%CI = 0.78-0.96], p = 0.005). However, in oligometastases exclusively treated with single-fraction SRS, LTC was similar among groups (RR = 0.92 [95%CI = 0.89-1.0], p = 0.30). Similarly, in patients with oligometastases treated with single-fraction SRS, RN (HR = 1.69; 95%CI = 0.72-3.97, p = 0.22), TT (MD = -29.64; 95%CI = -80.38-21.10, p = 0.25), and mortality were similar among groups (RR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.22-1.76, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that FB and MB SRS, particularly oligometastases treated with single-fraction, are comparable in terms of LTC, RN, TT, and mortality. Further research is essential to draw definitive conclusions.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to find optimal gantry, collimator, and couch angles for performing single isocenter, multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT-SRS). Nineteen angle sets were tested across seven linear accelerators for radiation-isocenter coincidence and off-isocenter coincidence. The off-isocenter Winston-Lutz test was performed to evaluate the accuracy of isocenter alignment for each angle set, and optimal angle sets as well as maximum off-isocenter distance to target for each angle set was determined. The influence of simulated patient weight on off-iso Winston-Lutz test accuracy was also inspected. METHOD: The SNC MultiMet-WL phantom and MultiMet-WL QA Software v2.1 were used for the direct measurement and analysis of the off-iso Winston-Lutz test (also referred to as Winston-Lutz-Gao test). A two-step method was developed to ensure precise initial placement of the target. Nineteen beams were delivered at 6X energy and 2 × 2 cm field size to each of six targets on the MultiMet Cube with couch kicks at five cardinal angles (90°, 45°, 0°, 315°, and 270°). To reduce imaging uncertainty, only EPID was used in target alignment and test image acquisition. A total of 200 Ibs (90.7 kg) of weight was also used to mimic patient weight. All tests were performed on both the free table and the weighted table. RESULTS: For two new TrueBeam machines, the maximum offset was within the 1 mm tolerance when the off-iso distance is less than 7 cm. Two older VitalBeam machines exhibited unfavorable gantry, couch, and collimator (GCC) angle sets: Linac No. 3 at (0,90,0), (0,270,0) and Linac No. 4 at (0,45,45) and (0,90,0). The C-Series Linacs failed in the majority of GCC angle sets, with Linac No. 5 exhibiting a maximum offset of 1.53 mm. Four of seven machines show a clear trend that offset increases with off-isocenter distance. Additionally, the IGRT table was less susceptible to the addition of simulated patient weight than the ExactCouch. CONCLUSION: Among the seven linear accelerators addressed, newer model machines such as the Varian TrueBeam were more precise than older models, especially in comparison to the C-Series Linacs. The newer machines are more suitable for delivering SIMT-SRS procedures in all GCC angle sets, and the results indicate that newer TrueBeams are capable of performing SIMT-SRS procedures at all angle sets for targets of off-iso distances up to 7 cm. The trend that offset between the target center and radiation field center increases with off-iso distance, however, does not always hold true across machines. This may be comprised by the EPID's severe off-axis horn effect. Lastly, the IGRT couch was less susceptible to patient weight compared to ExactCouch in the off-isocenter Winston-Lutz test.
Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Software , Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ZAP-X system is a novel gyroscopic radiosurgical system based on a 3 MV linear accelerator and collimator cones with a diameter between 4 and 25 mm. Advances in imaging modalities to detect small and early-stage pathologies allow for an early and less invasive treatment, where a smaller collimator matching the anatomical target could provide better sparing of surrounding healthy tissue. PURPOSE: A novel 3 mm collimator cone for the ZAP-X was developed. This study aims to investigate the usability of a commercial diode detector (microSilicon) for the dosimetric characterization of this small collimator cone; and to investigate the underlying small field perturbation effects. METHODS: Profile measurements in five depths as well as PDD and output ratio measurements were performed with a microSilicon detector and radiochromic EBT3 films. In addition, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to validate the measurement observations and to quantify the perturbation effects of the microSilicon detector in these extremely small field conditions. RESULTS: It is shown that the microSilicon detector enables an accurate dosimetric characterization of the 3 mm beam. The profile parameters, such as the FWHM and 20%-80% penumbra width, agree within 0.1 to 0.2 mm between film and detector measurements. The output ratios agree within the measurement uncertainty between microSilicon detector and films, whereas the comparisons of the PDD results show good agreement with the Monte Carlo simulations. The analysis of the perturbation factors of the microSilicon detector reveals a small field correction factor of approximately 3% for the 3 mm circular beam and a correction factor smaller than 1.5% for field diameters above 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: It could be shown that the microSilicon detector is well-suitable for the characterization of the new 3 mm circular beam of the ZAP-X system.
Subject(s)
Monte Carlo Method , Particle Accelerators , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Humans , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/instrumentation , Computer Simulation , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Silicon/chemistryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Single-isocenter multi-target intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SIMT) is an effective treatment for brain metastases with complex treatment plans and delivery optimization necessitating rigorous quality assurance. This work aims to assess five methods for quality assurance of SIMT treatment plans in terms of their suitability and sensitivity to delivery errors. METHODS: Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK, GafChromic EBT Radiochromic Film, machine log files, and Varian Portal Dosimetry were all used to measure 15 variations of a single SIMT plan. Variations of the original plan were created with Python. They comprised various degrees of systematic MLC offsets per leaf up to 2 mm, random per-leaf variations with differing minimum and maximum magnitudes, simulated collimator, and dose miscalibrations (MU scaling). The erroneous plans were re-imported into Eclipse and plan-quality degradation was assessed by comparing each plan variation to the original clinical plan in terms of the percentage of clinical goals passing relative to the original plan. Each erroneous plan could be then ranked by the plan-quality degradation percentage following recalculation in the TPS so that the effects of each variation could be correlated with γ pass rates and detector suitability. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: It was found that 2%/1 mm is a good starting point for the ArcCHECK, Portal Dosimetry, and the SRS MapCHECK methods, respectively, and provides clinically relevant error detection sensitivity. Looser dose criteria of 5%/1 mm or 5%/1.5 mm are suitable for film dosimetry and log-file-based methods. The statistical methods explored can be expanded to other areas of patient-specific QA and detector assessment.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/instrumentation , AlgorithmsABSTRACT
This paper describes the design of an innovative linear accelerator image-guided radiosurgery (IGRS) device, which is based on a composite twofold rotary gantry structure. The paper discusses five aspects of the innovative device: its overall composition, the safety net space created by the accelerator radiation head as it rotates around the patient's longitudinal axis, the non-coplanar spherical coverage in the direction of the incidence angle for quasi-4π delivery, the structural features of the composite twofold rotary gantry, and the processes of treatment planning and implementation. It elaborates on the device's manufacturing feasibility, safety, effectiveness, accuracy, and efficiency. The conclusion is that this innovative device design holds significant development value and market promotion potential.
Subject(s)
Radiosurgery , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Particle Accelerators , Humans , Equipment DesignABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraventricular meningiomas (IVMs) are rare tumors with considerable treatment-associated morbidity due to their challenging location. Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is sparsely reported in the literature. We describe our experience over the last 35 years using Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for IVMs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the GKRS database identifying 2501 meningiomas treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center over the last 35 years. Nineteen patients with (12 males, mean age = 53.2 years, range 14-84) 20 IVMs were identified. Headache was the most frequent presenting symptom (N = 12), and the trigone of the lateral ventricle was the most common location (N = 18). The median tumor volume was 4.8 cc (range, 0.8-17). The median margin dose was 14 Gy (range, 12-25) delivered at 50% isodose line. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 63.1 months (range, 6-322.4) symptom control was achieved in 18 (94.7%) patients. The overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 95% at 5 years, and 85% at 10-years. After Log-rank test, patients who underwent GKRS within 12 months after diagnosis (vs. ≥ 12 months, X2: 4.455, p = 0.035), patients treated with primary GKRS without prior biopsy (vs. prior biopsy, X2: 4.000, p = 0.046), and patients with WHO grade I meningioma (vs. WHO II, X2: 9.000, p = 0.003) had a longer PFS. Imaging showed peritumoral edema in seven cases at a median of 10.5 (range, 6.13-24.3) months after GKRS. Only three of these patients were symptomatic and were successfully managed with oral medications. Cox´s regression revealed that a V12Gy ≥ 10 cc [HR: 10.09 (95% CI: 2.11-48.21), p = 0.004], and tumor volume ≥ 8 cc [HR: 5.87 (95% CI: 1.28-26.97), p = 0.023] were associated with a higher risk of peritumoral edema. CONCLUSION: GKRS is an effective and safe management option for intraventricular meningiomas. Early GKRS should be considered as a primary management modality for small and medium sized IVM and adjuvant management for residual IVMs.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Radiosurgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Follow-Up Studies , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires dedicated systems to monitor patient motion in order to avoid inaccurate radiation delivery due to involuntary shifts. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and sensitivity of two distinct motion monitoring systems used for frameless SRS. METHODS: A surface image-guided system known as optical surface monitoring system (OSMS), and a fiducial marker-based system known as high definition motion management (HDMM) as part of the latest Gamma Knife Icon® were compared. A 3D printer-based cranial motion phantom was developed to evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of these two systems in terms of: (1) the capability to recognize predefined shifts up to 3â¯cm, and (2) the capability to recognize predefined speeds up to 3â¯cm/s. The performance of OSMS, in terms of different reference surfaces, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Translational motion could be accurately detected by both systems, with an accuracy of 0.3â¯mm for displacement up to 1â¯cm, and 0.5â¯mm for larger displacements. The reference surface selection had an impact on OSMS performance, with flat surface resulting in less accuracy. HDMM was in general more sensitive when compared with OSMS in capturing the motion, due to its faster frame rate, but a delay in response was observed with faster speeds. Both systems were less sensitive in detection of superior-inferior motion when compared to lateral or vertical displacement directions. CONCLUSION: Translational motion can be accurately and sensitively detected by OSMS and HDMM real-time monitoring systems. However, performance variations were observed along different motion directions, as well as amongst the selection of reference images. Caution is needed when using real-time monitoring systems for frameless SRS treatment.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Equipment Design , Humans , Motion , Patient Positioning/instrumentation , Patient Positioning/methods , Phantoms, Imaging , Printing, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment which allows delivery of an ablative radiation dose with high accuracy and precision. SABR is an established treatment for both primary and secondary liver malignancies, and technological advances have improved its efficacy and safety. Respiratory motion management to reduce tumour motion and image guidance to achieve targeting accuracy are crucial elements of liver SABR. This phase II multi-institutional TROG 17.03 study, Liver Ablative Radiotherapy using Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (LARK), aims to investigate and assess the dosimetric impact of the KIM real-time image guidance technology. KIM utilises standard linear accelerator equipment and therefore has the potential to be a widely available real-time image guidance technology for liver SABR. METHODS: Forty-six patients with either hepatocellular carcinoma or oligometastatic disease to the liver suitable for and treated with SABR using Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) guidance will be included in the study. The dosimetric impact will be assessed by quantifying accumulated patient dose distribution with or without the KIM intervention. The patient treatment outcomes of local control, toxicity and quality of life will be measured. DISCUSSION: Liver SABR is a highly effective treatment, but precise dose delivery is challenging due to organ motion. Currently, there is a lack of widely available options for performing real-time tumour localisation to assist with accurate delivery of liver SABR. This study will provide an assessment of the impact of KIM as a potential solution for real-time image guidance in liver SABR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on December 7th 2016 on ClinicalTrials.gov under the trial-ID NCT02984566 .
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Organ Motion , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Australia , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/secondary , Denmark , Fiducial Markers , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Quality of Life , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Respiration , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Given the threat of radiological and nuclear terrorism, it is imperative to understand and evaluate the security risk of radioactive sources. In this context, risk assessment is a function of threat, vulnerability, and consequences. Currently, no broad risk index exists for radiological facilities, such as healthcare centers and universities. This study aims to develop and demonstrate a methodology to compute a potential facility risk index (PFRI) based on a probable loss event (LE) and loss magnitude (LM) resulting from a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack. The threat component of the PFRI is devised as a utility function weighing the threat group attributes and RDD radioactive material preference. The principles of probabilistic risk assessment and pathway analysis are implemented to account for RDD radioactive material theft probabilities in different attack scenarios. Locational hazards and nuclear security culture are measured as a function of radiological facility vulnerability for LE. The LM of the attack, in the form of loss of life and economic damage, is then estimated to construct the PFRI. The methodology is applied to a hypothetical healthcare facility with a single radioactive material asset. For this example, the PFRI resulted in a value of 2.0 (on a scale of 1-10), showing low risk to the facility. The development of the PFRI provides a risk analysis tool that may be useful in making decisions for radiological security improvements.
Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Nuclear Weapons , Radioactive Hazard Release , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Decision Making , Facility Design and Construction , Hospitals , Humans , Indiana , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Probability , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Risk , Terrorism , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report long-term outcomes of 53 patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) submitted to a single high-dose LINAC-based radiosurgery (SRS) in our institution. METHODS: 48 (92%) patients were evaluable for clinical and MRI response as well as late toxicity. At a median follow-up of 12 years (range 2-16 years), local control (LC), hearing capacity, trigeminal and facial nerve function, and toxicity were assessed. Hearing capacity was classified according to the Gardner-Robertson scale, where class I-II patients had "serviceable hearing." RESULTS: Median dose of SRS was 16.5â¯Gy (range 13-20 Gy) and median tumor volume 1.7â¯cm3 (range 0.09-7.4â¯cm3). 35 (73%) patients were treated with SRS alone, in the remaining 13 (27%) patients, SRS was performed as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive tumors after previous microsurgery. Before SRS, 44 patients (92%) had hearing loss and 25 (52%) had "non-serviceable" hearing. Tumor extension, classified with Koos categories, was grade I-II in 27 (56%) and grade III-IV in 21 (44%) cases. LC was 100% and hearing preservation in "serviceable hearing" patients was 91%. 4 (11%) patients developed incomplete and intermittent ipsilateral facial nerve palsy which regressed in a median time of 6 months. Trigeminal toxicity was registered in 11 (23%) patients, reversible in 6 (13%) and permanent in 5 (10%). Only Koos tumor grade III-IV significantly influenced late toxicity (pâ¯= 0.01). CONCLUSION: LC and hearing preservation after SRS were excellent. Toxicity proved acceptable. Although the median administered dose (16.5â¯Gy) was rather high, the only factor which significantly influenced late toxicity was Koos tumor grade III-IV.
Subject(s)
Neuroma, Acoustic/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Facial Nerve/radiation effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing/radiation effects , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neuroma, Acoustic/diagnostic imaging , Neuroma, Acoustic/pathology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Trigeminal Nerve/radiation effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of prostate cancer (PC) recurrences after definitive or postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is still controversial. The aim of the present retrospective study was to report the preliminary clinical results and toxicity of a mono-institutional series of patients re-irradiated with linac-based SBRT in recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were previous definitive or adjuvant/salvage RT, evidence of biochemical recurrence and radiological detection of local relapse (Magnetic Resonance Imaging or PSMA/choline-Positron Emission Tomography), and IPSS <10. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS: Between 12/2014 and 12/2019, 24 patients with median age 75 years (65-89) underwent re-RT for PC recurrence. Median follow-up was 21 months (2-68). The recurrences occurred in 13 cases within the prostate and in 11 cases within the prostate bed. All patients were treated with SBRT to a median total dose of 30â¯Gy (25-36â¯Gy) in 5-6 fractions, and simultaneous androgen deprivation therapy was administered in 4 patients. Acute toxicity was G1 in 8.3% and G2 in 12.5% for genitourinary (GU), no acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred. Concerning late side effects, 19.7% of patients were found to have ≥G2 GU toxicity, including one G3 urethral stenosis. Only one case of G1 late GI toxicity occurred and no ≥G2. The 2year overall survival was 95%. The 1 and 2year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 80 and 54.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite of the heterogeneity of the sample, linac-based SBRT as a salvage treatment in previously irradiated locally recurrent PC patients seems to be a safe and feasible treatment option. Long-term data are pending.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Salvage Therapy/methods , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphatic Irradiation , Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Male , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urination Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Abdominal/pelvic lymph node (LN) oligometastasis, a pattern of treatment failure, is observed occasionally, and radiotherapy may work as salvage therapy. The optimal prescription dose, however, is yet to be determined. This study assessed the efficacy of high-dose radiotherapy. METHODS: The medical records of 113 patients at 4 institutes were retrospectively analysed who had 1 to 5 abdominal/pelvic LN oligometastases and were treated with definitive radiotherapy between 2008 and 2018. The exclusion criteria included non-epithelial tumours, uncontrolled primary lesions, palliative intent, and re-irradiation. The prescription dose was evaluated by using the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). Patients receiving EQD2 ≥ 60 Gy were placed into the high-dose group, and the remaining others the low-dose group. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate log-rank and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses were performed to explore predictive factors. Adverse events were compared between the high-dose and low-dose groups. RESULTS: The primary tumour sites included the colorectum (n = 28), uterine cervix (n = 27), endometrium (n = 15), and ovaries (n = 10). The rate of 2-year OS was 63.1%, that of LC 59.7%, and that of PFS 19.4%. On multivariate analyses, OS were significantly associated with solitary oligometastasis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48, p = 0.02), LC with high-dose radiotherapy (HR: 0.93, p < 0.001), and PFS with long disease-free interval (HR: 0.59, p = 0.01). Whereas high-dose radiotherapy did not significantly improve 2-year OS in the entire cohort (74.8% in the high-dose vs. 52.7% in the low-dose; p = 0.08), it did in the subgroup of solitary oligometastasis (88.8% in the high-dose vs. 56.3% in the low-dose; p = 0.009). As for Late grade ≥ 3 adverse event, ileus was observed in 7 patients (6%) and gastrointestinal bleeding in 4 (4%). No significant association between the irradiation dose and adverse event incidence was found. CONCLUSIONS: As salvage therapy, high-dose radiotherapy was recommendable for oligometastasis in the abdominal/pelvic LNs. For solitary oligometastasis, LC and OS were significantly better in the high-dose group.
Subject(s)
Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Abdomen , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Pelvis , Progression-Free Survival , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/mortality , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the neurocognitive function and neurological toxicity of frameless linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with 10 or more brain metastases (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive adult patients who received SRS for ten or more 10 BM < 3 cm in maximum size were evaluated. All plans were generated using a single-isocenter multiple-target (SIMT) SRS technique with doses of 22 Gy for lesions < 2 cm and 16-18 Gy for those ≥ 2 cm in size. Survival analyses were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method from the date of SRS. Neurocognitive function using the Hopkins verbal learning test-revised (HVLT-R) and activity of daily living scale (ADLS) were collected prospectively at baseline and at 3,6 and 12-month follow-up. Toxicity was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 5.0). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, 1-year survival and local control rates were 65% and 86%, respectively. Grade 2 or 3 toxicity occurred in eleven patients, being associated with radiological changes suggestive of radiation necrosis in seven patients. Three months after SRS, the mean relative decline was 14.2% for HVLT-R delayed recall, 12.3% for HVLT-R recognition, and 9.8% for HVLT-R total recall. A significant deterioration of HVLT-R scores ranged from 5.5 to 18.7% of patients at different time points. ADLS scores declined over time, but changes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: SRS is an effective and safe approach for patients with 10 or more BM able to maintain the pretreatment neurocognitive function in the majority of patients.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/psychology , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Memory , Radiosurgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: Dosimetric effects of inaccuracies of output factors (OFs) implemented in treatment planning systems (TPSs) were investigated.Materials and methods: Modified beam models (MBM) for which the OFs of small fields (down to 1 × 1 cm2) were increased by up to 12% compared to the original beam models (OBM) were created for two TPSs. These beam models were used to recalculate treatment plans of different complexity. Treatment plans using stereotactic 3D-conformal (s3D-CRT) for brain metastasis as well as VMAT plans for head and neck and prostate cancer patients were generated. Dose distributions calculated with the MBM and the OBM were compared to measured dose distributions acquired using film dosimetry and a 2D-detector-array. For the s3D-CRT plans the calculated and measured dose at the isocenter was evaluated. For VMAT, gamma pass rates (GPRs) were calculated using global gamma index with 3%/3 mm, 2%/3 mm, 1%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm with a 20% threshold. Contribution of small fields to the total fluence was expressed as the ratio (F) of fluence trough leaf openings smaller than 2 cm to the total fluence.Results: Using film dosimetry for the s3D-CRT plans, the average of the ratio of calculated dose to measured dose at the isocenter was 1.01 and 1.06 for the OBM and MBM model, respectively. A significantly lower GPR of the MBM compared to the OBM was only found for the localized prostate cases (F = 12.4%) measured with the 2D-detector-array and an acceptance criterion of 1%/3 mm.Conclusion: The effects of uncertainties in small field OFs implemented in TPSs are most pronounced for s3D-CRT cases and can be clearly identified using patient specific quality assurance. For VMAT these effects mainly remain undetected using standard patient specific quality assurance. Using tighter acceptance criteria combined with an analysis of the fluence generated by small fields can help identifying inaccuracies of OFs implemented in TPSs.
Subject(s)
Patient-Specific Modeling , Radiometry/standards , Radiosurgery/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiotherapy, Conformal/standards , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Computer Simulation , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Particle Accelerators , Phantoms, Imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiometry/statistics & numerical data , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Conformal/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, Conformal/statistics & numerical data , UncertaintyABSTRACT
CyberKnife® Lung Optimized Treatment (LOT) allows the treatment of lung cancer without invasive fiducial implantation. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and clinical outcome. One hundred fifteen patients (124 lesions) were treated with CyberKnife® using LOT. The median age was 72.6 years (range 31.8-90.3). From 124 treated lesions, 52 were with histopathological confirmation (41 primitive pulmonary cancers, 8 pulmonary metastases) and 72 as untyped tumors. For 5 patients (6 lesions) treatment was an in-field re-irradiation. Concomitant therapy was administered in 7 patients. Zero-View tracking was applied in 69 patients, 1-View in 33 patients, 2-View in 22 patients. The median total dose was 45 Gy (range 18-54), median dose/fraction was 15 Gy (range 4-18) with a median prescription isodose of 80% (range 68-85). The median planning target volume (PTV) was 25 cm3 (range 3-195). The median follow-up was 20 months (range 7-47). Thirty-seven patients (32%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 39 patients (34%) were alive with clinically evident disease, and 38 patients (33%) died of the disease. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 83% and 61%. The median time to progression was 19 months (95% confidence interval: 11-19 months), 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 62% and 41%, respectively. Smaller PTV was significantly associated with better OS, PFS and in-field PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses. Acute toxicity was observed in 36 patients (41%). Late toxicity was registered in 25 patients (29%). G3 late toxicity was observed in one patient (1.1%). Our data suggest that fiducial less-stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a feasible, well-tolerated and potentially effective treatment with high compliance in the setting of inoperable patients due to concomitant disease or previous treatments.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) is a minimally invasive surgical option for drug-resistant essential glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). The authors reviewed pain outcomes and complications in GPN patients who underwent a second or a third GKR for recurrent or persistent pain. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients treated in a single center (Marseille, France) since 2004 was performed. Median prescribed dose was 85 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) at second GKR and 85 Gy at third GKR. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. RESULTS: Six patients (4 males, 2 females) underwent second or third GKR. The median age was 70.2 years (range 64-83 years) at second GKR and 79.8 years at third GKR. No patient had any previous surgery but GKR. Five cases had a neurovascular conflict. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range 10-94 months) after second GKR and 16 months after third GKR. The median delay to initial pain freedom response was 30 days (range 3-120 days). One patient experienced pharyngeal hypoesthesia after second GKR. After a third GKR, up to 16 months, no side effects were encountered. At the last follow-up, 3 patients were BNI I, 2 were BNI IIIa, and one did not have any improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Second GKR resulted in pain reduction with low risk of additional morbidity. In patients unsuitable for microvascular decompression, GKR as a repeat or third treatment for intractable GPN is safe and effective. Third GKR was not associated with any side effects up to 16 months after the procedure.
Subject(s)
Glossopharyngeal Nerve Diseases/radiotherapy , Hypesthesia/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glossopharyngeal Nerve Diseases/surgery , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/instrumentationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Gamma Knife® planning software (TMR 10, Elekta Instruments, AB, Sweden) affords two ways of defining the skull volume, the "historical" one using manual measurements (still perform in some centers) and the new one using image-based skull contours. Our objective was to assess the potential variation of the dose delivery calculation using consecutively in the same patients the two above-mentioned techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in this self-case-control study, 50 patients, treated with GKRS between July 2016 and January 2017 in Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, distributed among four groups: convexity targets (n = 18), deep-seated targets (n = 13), vestibular schwannomas (n = 11), and trigeminal neuralgias (n = 8). Each planning was performed consecutively with the 2 skull definition techniques. For each treatment, we recorded the beam-on time (min), target volume coverage (%), prescription isodose volume (cm3), and maximal dose (Gy) to the nearest organ at risk if relevant, according to each of the 2 skull definition techniques. The image-based contours were performed using CT scan segmentation, based upon a standardized windowing for all patients. RESULTS: The median difference in beam-on time between manual measures and image-based contouring was + 0.45 min (IQR; 0.2-0.6) and was statistically significant (p < 0.0001), corresponding to an increase of 1.28% beam-on time per treatment, when using image-based contouring. The target location was not associated with beam-on time variation (p = 0.15). Regarding target volume coverage (p = 0.13), prescription isodose volume (p = 0.2), and maximal dose to organs at risk (p = 0.85), no statistical difference was reported between the two skull contour definition techniques. CONCLUSION: The beam-on time significantly increased using image-based contouring, resulting in an increase of the total dose delivery per treatment with the new TMR 10 algorithm. Other dosimetric parameters did not differ significantly. This raises the question of other potential impacts. One is potential dose modulation that should be performed as an adjustment to new techniques developments. The second is how this changes the biologically equivalent dose per case, as related to an increased beam on time, delivered dose, etc., and how this potentially changes the radiobiological effects of GKRS in an individual patient.
Subject(s)
Neuroma, Acoustic/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Algorithms , Humans , Middle Aged , Radiometry , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
The IAEA TRS 483 protocol1 for the dosimetry of small static fields in radiotherapy was used to calculate output factors for the Elekta Synergy linac at the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Small field output factors for both square and circular fields were measured using nine different detectors. The "corrected" output factors (ratio of detector readings multiplied by the appropriate correction factor from the protocol) showed better consistency compared to the "uncorrected" output factors (ratio of detector readings only), with the relative standard deviation decreasing by approximately 1% after the application of the relevant correction factors. Comparisons relative to an arbitrarily chosen PTW 60019 microDiamond detector showed a reduction of maximal variation for the corrected values of approximately 3%. A full uncertainty budget was prepared to analyze the consistency of the output factors. Agreement within uncertainties between all detectors and field sizes was found, except for the 15 mm circular field. The results of this study show that the application of IAEA TRS 4831 when measuring small fields will improve the consistency of small field measurements when using multiple detectors contained within the protocol.
Subject(s)
Radiometry/methods , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy/methods , Australia , Equipment Design , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Monte Carlo Method , Particle Accelerators , Photons , Radiation Protection , Reproducibility of Results , UncertaintyABSTRACT
Cone-beam CT-guided single dose of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment with a flattening filter free (FFF) beam and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a safe and highly effective treatment modality for selective small lung lesions. Four-dimensional (4D) CT-based treatment plans were generated using advanced AcurosXB algorithm for heterogeneity corrections. 6X-FFF beam produced highly conformal radiosurgical dose distribution to the target and reduced lung SBRT fraction duration to less than 10 min for a single dose of 30 Gy, significantly improving patient comfort and clinic workflow. Early follow-up CT imaging results (mean, 8 months) show high local control rates (100%) with no acute lung or rib toxicity. Longer clinical follow-up in a larger patient cohort managed in this fashion is underway to further validate this treatment approach.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/methods , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Algorithms , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Radiometry , Radiosurgery/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/instrumentationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To quantify the differences in dosimetry as a function of ipsilateral lung density and treatment delivery parameters for stereotactic, single dose of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered with 6X flattening filter free (6X-FFF) beams compared to traditional flattened 6X (6X-FF) beams. MATERIALS/METHODS: Thirteen consecutive early stage I-II non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were treated with highly conformal noncoplanar VMAT SBRT plans (3-6 partial arcs) using 6X-FFF beam and advanced Acuros-based dose calculations to a prescription dose of 30 Gy in one fraction to the tumor margin. These clinical cases included relatively smaller tumor (island tumors) sizes (2.0-4.2 cm diameters) and varying average ipsilateral lung densities between 0.14 g/cc and 0.34 g/cc. Treatment plans were reoptimized with 6X-FF beams for identical beam/arc geometries and planning objectives. For same target coverage, the organs-at-risk (OAR) dose metrics as a function of ipsilateral lung density were compared between 6X-FFF and 6X-FF plans. Moreover, monitor units (MU), beam modulation factor (MF) and beam-on time (BOT) were evaluated. RESULTS: Both plans met the RTOG-0915 protocol compliance. The ipsilateral lung density and the tumor location heavily influenced the treatment plans with 6X-FFF and 6X-FF beams, showing differences up to 12% for the gradient indices. For similar target coverage, 6X-FFF beams showed better target conformity, lower intermediate dose-spillage, and lower dose to the OAR. Additionally, BOT was reduced by a factor of 2.3 with 6X-FFF beams compared to 6X-FF beams. CONCLUSION: While prescribing dose to the tumor periphery, 6X-FFF VMAT plans for stereotactic single-dose lung SBRT provided similar target coverage with better dose conformity, superior intermediate dose-spillage (improved dose coverage at tumor interface), and improved OAR sparing compared to traditional 6X-FF beams and significantly reduced treatment time. The ipsilateral lung density and tumor location considerably affected dose distributions requiring special attention for clinical SBRT plan optimization on a per-patient basis. Clinical follow up of these patients for tumor local-control rate and treatment-related toxicities is in progress.