Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 387
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Hum Reprod ; 39(5): 981-991, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438132

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Which assited reproductive technology (ART) interventions in high-income countries are cost-effective and which are not? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among all ART interventions assessed in economic evaluations, most high-cost interventions, including preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) for a general population and ICSI for unexplained infertility, are unlikely to be cost-effective owing to minimal or no increase in effectiveness. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Approaches to reduce costs in order to increase access have been identified as a research priority for future infertility research. There has been an increasing number of ART interventions implemented in routine clinical practice globally, before robust assessments of evidence on economic evaluations. The extent of clinical effectiveness of some studied comparisons has been evaluated in high-quality research, allowing more informative decision making around cost-effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a systematic review and searched seven databases (MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, ECONLIT, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) for studies examining ART interventions for infertility together with an economic evaluation component (cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, or cost-minimization assessment), in high-income countries, published since January 2011. The last search was 22 June 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Two independent reviewers assessed publications and included those fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Studies were examined to assess the cost-effectiveness of the studied intervention, as well as the reporting quality of the study. The chosen outcome measure and payer perspective were also noted. Completeness of reporting was assessed against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard. Results are presented and summarized based on the intervention studied. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The review included 40 studies which were conducted in 11 high-income countries. Most studies (n = 34) included a cost-effectiveness analysis. ART interventions included medication or strategies for controlled ovarian stimulation (n = 15), IVF (n = 9), PGT-A (n = 7), single embryo transfer (n = 5), ICSI (n = 3), and freeze-all embryo transfer (n = 1). Live birth was the mostly commonly reported primary outcome (n = 27), and quality-adjusted life years was reported in three studies. The health funder perspective was used in 85% (n = 34) of studies. None of the included studies measured patient preference for treatment. It remains uncertain whether PGT-A improves pregnancy rates compared to IVF cycles managed without PGT-A, and therefore cost-effectiveness could not be demonstrated for this intervention. Similarly, ICSI in non-male factor infertility appears not to be clinically effective compared to standard fertilization in an IVF cycle and is therefore not cost-effective. Interventions such as use of biosimilars or HMG for ovarian stimulation are cheaper but compromise clinical effectiveness. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Lack of both preference-based and standardized outcomes limits the comparability of results across studies. The selection of efficacy evidence offered for some interventions for economic evaluations is not always based on high-quality randomized trials and systematic reviews. In addition, there is insufficient knowledge of the willingness to pay thresholds of individuals and state funders for treatment of infertility. There is variable quality of reporting scores, which might increase uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Investment in strategies to help infertile people who utilize ART is justifiable at both personal and population levels. This systematic review may assist ART funders decide how to best invest to maximize the likelihood of delivery of a healthy child. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding for this study. E.C. and R.W. receive salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through their fellowship scheme (EC GNT1159536, RW 2021/GNT2009767). M.D.-T. reports consulting fees from King Fahad Medical School. All other authors have no competing interests to declare. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Prospero CRD42021261537.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developed Countries , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Female , Pregnancy , Developed Countries/economics , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/economics , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/economics , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Preimplantation Diagnosis/economics , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Pregnancy Rate
2.
Hum Reprod ; 39(9): 1909-1924, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043375

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: How are ART and IUI regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, and how has the situation changed since 2018? SUMMARY ANSWER: Of the 43 countries performing ART and IUI in Europe, and participating in the survey, specific legislation exists in only 39 countries, public funding varies across and sometimes within countries (and is lacking or minimal in four countries), and national registries are in place in 33 countries; only a small number of changes were identified, most of them in the direction of improving accessibility, through increased public financial support and/or opening access to additional subgroups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The annual reports of the European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) clearly show the existence of different approaches across Europe regarding accessibility to and efficacy of ART and IUI treatments. In a previous survey, some coherent information was gathered about how those techniques were regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, showing that diversity is the paradigm in this medical field. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A survey was designed using the SurveyMonkey tool consisting of 90 questions covering several domains (legal, funding, and registry) and considering specific details on the situation of third-party donations. New questions widened the scope of the previous survey. Answers refer to the situation of countries on 31 December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: All members of the EIM were invited to participate. The received answers were checked and initial responders were asked to address unclear answers and to provide any additional information considered relevant. Tables resulting from the consolidated data were then sent to members of the Committee of National Representatives of ESHRE, requesting a second check. Conflicting information was clarified by direct contact. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Information was received from 43 out of the 45 European countries where ART and IUI are performed. There were 39 countries with specific legislation on ART, and artificial insemination was considered an ART technique in 33 of them. Accessibility is limited to infertile couples only in 8 of the 43 countries. In 5 countries, ART and IUI are permitted also for treatments of single women and all same sex couples, while a total of 33 offer treatment to single women and 19 offer treatment to female couples. Use of donated sperm is allowed in all except 2 countries, oocyte donation is allowed in 38, simultaneous donation of sperm and oocyte is allowed in 32, and embryo donation is allowed in 29 countries. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)-M/SR (for monogenetic disorders, structural rearrangements) is not allowed in 3 countries and PGT-A (for aneuploidy) is not allowed in 10; surrogacy is accepted in 15 countries. Except for marital/sexual situation, female age is the most frequently reported limiting criterion for legal access to ART: minimal age is usually set at 18 years and the maximum ranges from 42 to 54 with some countries not using numeric definition. Male maximum age is set in very few countries. Where third-party donors are permitted, age is frequently a limiting criterion (male maximum age ranging from 35 to 50; female maximum age from 30 to 37). Other legal restrictions in third-party donation are the number of children born from the same donor (or, in some countries, the number of families with children from the same donor) and, in 12 countries, there is a maximum number of oocyte donations. How countries deal with the anonymity is diverse: strict anonymity, anonymity just for the recipients (not for children when reaching legal adulthood age), a mixed system (anonymous and non-anonymous donations), and strict non-anonymity. Inquiring about donors' genetic screening showed that most countries have enforced either mandatory or scientific recommendations that exclude the most prevalent genetic diseases, although, again, diversity is evident. Reimbursement/compensation systems exist in more than 30 European countries, with around 10 describing clearly defined maximum amounts considered acceptable. Public funding systems are extremely variable. One country provides no financial assistance to ART/IUI patients and three offer only minimal support. Limits to the provision of funding are defined in the others i.e. age (female maximum age is the most used), existence of previous children, BMI, maximum number of treatments publicly supported, and techniques not entitled for funding. In a few countries reimbursement is linked to a clinical policy. The definitions of the type of expenses covered within an IVF/ICSI cycle, up to which limit, and the proportion of out-of-pocket costs for patients are also extremely dissimilar. National registries of ART are in place in 33 out of the 43 countries contributing to the survey and a registry of donors exists in 19 of them. When comparing with the results of the previous survey, the main changes are: (i) an extension of the beneficiaries of ART techniques (and IUI), evident in nine countries; (ii) public financial support exists now in Albania and Armenia; (iii) in Luxembourg, the only ART centre expanded its on-site activities; (iv) donor-conceived children are entitled to know the donor identity in six countries more than in 2018; and (v) four more countries have set a maximum number of oocyte donations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the responses were provided by well-informed and committed individuals and submitted to double checking, no formal validation by official bodies was in place. Therefore, possible inaccuracies cannot be excluded. The results presented are a cross-section in time, and ART and IUI frameworks within European countries undergo continuous modification. Finally, some domains of ART activity were deliberately left out of the scope of this survey. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results offer a detailed updated view of the ART and IUI situation in European countries. It provides extensive answers to many relevant questions related to ART usage at the national level and could be used by institutions and policymakers at both national and European levels. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has no external funding, and all costs were covered by ESHRE. There were no competing interests.


Subject(s)
Registries , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Europe , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Insemination, Artificial/economics , Insemination, Artificial/legislation & jurisprudence , Fertilization in Vitro/economics , Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 48(6): 103850, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582042

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the views and experiences of patient and expert stakeholders on the positive and negative impacts of commercial influences on the provision of assisted reproductive technology (ART) services, and what are their suggestions for governance reforms? DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 ART industry experts from across Australia and New Zealand and 25 patients undergoing ART from metropolitan and regional Australia, between September 2020 and September 2021. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Expert and patient participants considered that commercial forces influence the provision of ART in a number of positive ways - increasing sustainability, ensuring consistency in standards and providing patients with greater choice. Participants also considered commercial forces to have a number of negative impacts, including increased costs to government and patients; the excessive use of interventions that lack sufficient evidence to be considered part of standard care; inadequately informed consent (particularly with regard to financial information); and threats to patient-provider relationships and patient-centred care. Participants varied in whether they believed that professional self-regulation is sufficient. While recognizing the benefits of commercial investment in healthcare, many considered that regulatory reforms, as well as organizational cultural initiatives, are needed as means to ensure the primacy of patient well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The views expressed in this study should be systematically and critically examined to derive insights into how best to govern ART. These insights may also inform the design and delivery of other types of healthcare that are provided in the private sector.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Australia , Female , New Zealand , Male , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel
4.
Health Econ ; 33(7): 1454-1479, 2024 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475875

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the optimal fiscal treatment of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in an economy where individuals differ in their reproductive capacity (or fecundity) and in their wage. We find that the optimal ART tax policy varies with the postulated social welfare criterion. Utilitarianism redistributes only between individuals with unequal fecundity and wages but not between parents and childless individuals. To the opposite, ex post egalitarianism (which gives absolute priority to the worst-off in realized terms) redistributes from individuals with children toward those without children, and from individuals with high fecundity toward those with low fecundity, so as to compensate for both the monetary cost of ART and the disutility from involuntary childlessness resulting from unsuccessful ART investments. Under asymmetric information and in order to solve for the incentive problem, utilitarianism recommends to either tax or subsidize ART investments of low-fecundity-low-productivity individuals at the margin, depending on the degree of complementarity between fecundity and ART in the fertility technology. On the opposite, ex post egalitarianism always recommends marginal taxation of ART.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Taxes , Health Policy , Fertility , Female
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(7): 1778-1786, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37194162

ABSTRACT

AIM: From April 2022, the Japanese government funding system for assisted reproductive technology (ART) has shifted from government subsidies to universal health insurance. To date, studies estimating the health care expenditure for ART are scarce. We estimated health care expenditures for ART cycles and compared the proportion of patients' out-of-pocket payment by ovarian stimulation protocols under the Japanese government subsidy system. METHODS: We linked payment information for government subsidies in Saitama Prefecture during 2016 and 2017 with the Japanese ART registry. Health care expenditures for all treatment cycles in Japan during 2017 among women aged <43 years (n = 369 757) were estimated using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: We linked 6269 subsidy applications to the Japanese ART registry. The average treatment fee for a fresh cycle was 376 434 JPY (standard deviation = 159 581). However, significant variation was observed across ovarian stimulation protocols. The estimated health care expenditure for ART during 2017 was 101 278 629 888 JPY (920 714 817 USD), leading to a 0.24% increase in the national health care expenditure for fiscal year 2017. Fresh cycles accounted for 70% of the expenditure. The proportion of the average patient out-of-pocket payment for one treatment cycle was smaller for natural (0%) and mild ovarian stimulation using clomiphene citrate (4.5%-20.7%) than those of conventional stimulation (30.3%-32.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance coverage for ART would increase national health care expenditure by 0.24%. Under the subsidy system, the proportion of the average patient out-of-pocket payment was smaller for natural and mild ovarian stimulation than conventional stimulations.


Subject(s)
East Asian People , Health Expenditures , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Japan/epidemiology , Financing, Government/economics , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Universal Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data
6.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): 106-114, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34914662

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize demographics, costs, and workplace support for surgeons using assisted reproductive technology (ART), adoption, and surrogacy to build their families. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: As the surgical workforce diversifies, the needs of surgeons building a family are changing. ART, adoption, and surrogacy may be used with greater frequency among female surgeons who delay childbearing and surgeons in same-sex relationships. Little is known about costs and workplace support for these endeavors. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to surgeons through surgical societies and social media. Rates of ART use were compared between partners of male surgeons and female surgeons and multivariate analysis used to assess risk factors. Surgeons using ART, adoption, or surrogacy were asked to describe costs and time off work to pursue these options. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-nine surgeons participated. Compared to male surgeons, female surgeons were more likely to report delaying children due to surgical training (64.9% vs. 43.5%, P < 0.001), have fewer children (1.9 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001), and use ART (25.2% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.035). Compared to non-surgeon partners of male surgeons, female surgeons were older at first pregnancy (33 vs 31 years, P < 0.001) with age > 35 years associated with greater odds of ART use (odds ratio 3.90; 95% confidence interval 2.74-5.55, P < 0.001). One-third of surgeons using ART spent >$40,000; most took minimal time off work for treatments. Forty-five percent of same-sex couples used adoption or surrogacy. 60% of surgeons using adoption or surrogacy spent >$40,000 and most took minimal paid parental leave. CONCLUSIONS: ART, adoption, or surrogacy is costly and lacks strong workplace support in surgery, disproportionately impacting women and same-sex couples. Equitable and inclusive environments supporting all routes to parenthood ensure recruitment and retention of a diverse workforce. Surgical leaders must enact policies and practices to normalize childbearing as part of an early surgical career, including financial support and equitable parental leave for a growing group of surgeons pursuing ART, surrogacy, or adoption to become parents.


Subject(s)
Adoption , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surgeons/psychology , Surrogate Mothers , Age Factors , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female , Infertility, Male , Male , Parental Leave/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Single Parent , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 19(1): 174, 2021 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34847941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) insurance mandates promote more selective utilization of ART clinic resources including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Our objective was to examine whether ICSI utilization differs by state insurance mandates for ART coverage and assess if such a difference is associated with male factor, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and/or live birth rates. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data from 2018, ART clinics in ART-mandated states (n = 8, AR, CT, HI, IL, MD, MA, NJ, RI) were compared individually to one another and with non-mandated states in aggregate (n = 42) for use of ICSI, male factor, PGT, and live birth rates. ANOVA was used to evaluate differences between ART-mandated states and non-mandated states. Individual ART-mandated states were compared using Welch t-tests. Statistical significance was determined by Bonferroni Correction. RESULTS: There were significant differences in ICSI rates (%, mean ± SD) between MA (53.3 ± 21.3) and HI (90.7 ± 19.6), p = 0.028; IL (86.5 ± 18.7) and MA, p = 0.002; IL and MD (57.2 ± 30.8), p = 0.039; IL and NJ (62.0 ± 26.8), p = 0.007; between non-mandated states in aggregate (79.9 ± 19.9) and MA, p = 0.006, and NJ (62.0 ± 26.8), p = 0.02. Male factor rates of HI (65.8 ± 16.0) were significantly greater compared to CT (18.8 ± 8.7), IL (26.0 ± 11.9), MA (26.9 ± 6.6), MD (29.3 ± 9.9), NJ (30.6 ± 17.9), and non-mandated states in aggregate (29.7 ± 13.7), all p < 0.0001. No significant differences were reported for use of PGT and/or live birth rates across all age groups regardless of mandate status. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI use varied significantly among ART-mandated states while demonstrating no differences in live birth rates. These data suggest that the prevalence of male factor and the presence of a state insurance mandate are not the only factors influencing ICSI use. It is suggested that other non-clinical factors may impact the rate of ICSI utilization in a given state.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Retrospective Studies , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/economics
8.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 42(6): 1087-1096, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33931369

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH QUESTION: The economic and reproductive medicine response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the USA has reduced the affordability and accessibility of fertility care. What is the impact of the 2008 financial recession and the COVID-19 recession on fertility treatments and cumulative live births? DESIGN: The study examined annual US natality, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention IVF cycle activity and live birth data from 1999 to 2018 encompassing 3,286,349 treatment cycles, to estimate the age-stratified reduction in IVF cycles undertaken after the 2008 financial recession, with forward quantitative modelling of IVF cycle activity and cumulative live births for 2020 to 2023. RESULTS: The financial recession of 2008 caused a 4-year plateau in fertility treatments with a predicted 53,026 (95% confidence interval [CI] 49,581 to 56,471) fewer IVF cycles and 16,872 (95% CI 16,713 to 17,031) fewer live births. A similar scale of economic recession would cause 67,386 (95% CI 61,686 to 73,086) fewer IVF cycles between 2020 and 2023, with women younger than 35 years overall undertaking 22,504 (95% CI 14,320 to 30,690) fewer cycles, compared with 4445 (95% CI 3144 to 5749) fewer cycles in women over the age of 40 years. This equates to overall 25,143 (95% CI 22,408 to 27,877) fewer predicted live births from IVF, of which only 490 (95% CI 381 to 601) are anticipated to occur in women over the age of 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 recession could have a profound impact on US IVF live birth rates in young women, further aggravating pre-existing declines in total fertility rates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Fertility/physiology , Live Birth , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Adult , Birth Rate , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy
9.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(3): 571-576, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332903

ABSTRACT

Access to assisted reproductive technology (ART) and fertility preservation remains restricted in middle and low income countries. We sought to review the status of ART and fertility preservation in Brazil, considering social indicators and legislative issues that may hinder the universal access to these services. Although the Brazilian Constitution expressly provides the right to health, and ordinary law ensures the state is obliged to support family planning, access to services related to ART and fertility preservation is neither easy nor egalitarian in Brazil. Only a handful of public hospitals provide free ART, and their capacity far from meets demand. Health insurance does not cover ART, and the cost of private care is unaffordable to most people. Brazilian law supports, but does not command, the state provision of ART and fertility preservation to guarantee the right to family planning; therefore, the availability of state-funded treatments is still scarce, reinforcing social disparities. Economic projections suggest that including ART in the Brazilian health system is affordable and may actually become profitable to the state in the long term, not to mention the ethical imperative of recognizing infertility as a disease, with no reason to be excluded from a health system that claims to be 'universal'.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Health Services Accessibility , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Brazil , Family Planning Services/economics , Family Planning Services/ethics , Family Planning Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Fertility Preservation/ethics , Fertility Preservation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Healthcare Disparities/ethics , Healthcare Disparities/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infertility/economics , Infertility/epidemiology , Infertility/therapy , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Rights/ethics , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
11.
BMC Womens Health ; 20(1): 234, 2020 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Commercial surrogacy is a highly controversial issue that leads to heated debates in the feminist literature, especially when surrogacy takes place in developing countries and when it is performed by local women for wealthy international individuals. The objective of this article is to confront common assumptions with the narratives and experiences described by Indian surrogates themselves. METHODS: This qualitative study included 33 surrogates interviewed in India (Mumbai, Chennai and New Delhi) who were at different stages of the surrogacy process. They were recruited through five clinics and agencies. This 2-year field study was conducted before the 2018 surrogacy law. RESULTS: Surrogates met the criteria fixed by the national guidelines in terms of age and marital and family situation. The commitment to surrogacy had generally been decided with the husband. Its aim was above all to improve the socioeconomic condition of the family. Women described surrogacy as offering better conditions than their previous paid activity. They had clear views on the child and their work. However, they declared that they faced difficulties and social condemnation as surrogacy is associated with extra-marital relationships. They also described a medical process in which they had no autonomy although they did not express complaints. Overall, surrogates did not portray themselves as vulnerable women and victims, but rather as mothers and spouses taking control of their destiny. CONCLUSIONS: The reality of surrogacy in India embraces antagonistic features that we analyze in this paper as "paradoxes". First, while women have become surrogates in response to gender constraints as mothers and wives, yet in so doing they have gone against gender norms. Secondly, while surrogacy was socially perceived as dirty work undertaken in order to survive, surrogates used surrogacy as a means to upward mobility for themselves and their children. Finally, while surrogacy was organized to counteract accusations of exploitation, surrogates were under constant domination by the medical system and had no decision-making power in the surrogacy process. This echoes their daily life as women. Although the Indian legal framework has changed, surrogacy still challenges gender norms, particularly in other developing countries where the practice is emerging.


Subject(s)
Commerce/ethics , Decision Making/ethics , Reproduction/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Child , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/economics , Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , India , Interviews as Topic , Mothers , Pregnancy , Public Policy , Qualitative Research , Surrogate Mothers/psychology
12.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 37(1): 53-61, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823133

ABSTRACT

Even the strictest laboratories and clinics are prone to the occurrence of microbial contamination. In the case of in vitro fertilization (IVF) research and practice facilities, the number of possible sources is particularly vast. In addition to ambient air, personnel, and non-sterilized materials, follicular fluid and semen from patients are a very common gateway for a diverse range of bacteria and fungi into embryo cultures. Even so, reports of contamination cases are rare, what leads many clinics to see the issue as a negligible risk. Microbiological contamination may result in the demise of the patient's embryos, leading to additional costs to both the patient and the clinics. Regardless of financial loss, emotional costs, and stress levels during IVF are highly distressing. Other worrisome consequences include DNA fragmentation, poor-quality embryos, early pregnancy loss or preterm birth, and possible long-term damages that need further investigation. In this review, we aimed to shed a light on the issue that we consider largely underestimated and to be the underlying cause of poor IVF outcomes in many cases. We also discuss the composition of the microbiome and how its interaction with the reproductive tract of IVF-seeking patients might influence their outcomes. In conclusion, we urge clinics to more rigorously identify, register, and report contamination occurrences, and highlight the role of the study of the microbiome to improve overall results and safety of assisted reproduction.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/economics , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Fertilization in Vitro/economics , Fertilization in Vitro/standards , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards
13.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 37(7): 1553-1561, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462416

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the causes of infertility and artificial reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in women of African descent living in the Caribbean and Bermuda. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study composed of a questionnaire administered to providers who care for women undergoing ART in the Caribbean and Bermuda. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire from the Deerfield Institute was adapted to meet the aims of our study with their permission. Eight infertility clinics in the Caribbean and Bermuda were identified. The primary physician at each site was contacted via email and invited to participate in the study. Questionnaires were completed via interview or electronically. Responses were collected in a REDCap database for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were five respondents from Barbados, Bermuda (× 2), Puerto Rico, and the Bahamas. The most commonly reported etiologies of infertility among Afro-Caribbean patients were female-male factor and uterine factor. In vitro fertilization (IVF) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is performed more often than conventional IVF. The cumulative live birth rates (LBR) after ART for those ages ≤ 34, 35-37, 38-42, and > 42 were 52%, 40%, 22%, and 12%, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate was 31.5% for total patients. The factors reported to be most important in hindering patients from cycling were coping emotionally with poor ovarian response and cost. The biggest restraints to infertility care were costs and a lack of local IVF centers on all islands. CONCLUSION: Afro-Caribbean women receiving infertility care in the Caribbean may have better ART outcomes compared to African-American women in the United States (US).


Subject(s)
Infertility/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Bahamas , Barbados , Bermuda , Birth Rate , Black People , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility/epidemiology , Live Birth , Male , Physicians , Pregnancy , Puerto Rico , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 37(7): 1545-1552, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32409983

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Improving access to care is an issue at the forefront of reproductive medicine. We sought to describe how one academic center, set in the background of a large and diverse metropolitan city, cares for patients with extremely limited access to reproductive specialists. METHODS: The NYU Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) Fellowship program provides a "fellow-run clinic" within Manhattan's Bellevue Hospital Center, which is led by the REI fellows and supervised by the REI attendings of the NYU Langone Health system. A description of the history of the hospital as well as the logistics of the fertility clinic is provided as a logistical template for implementation. RESULTS: The fellow-run fertility clinic at Bellevue hospital is held on two half days per month seeing approximately 150 new patients per year. The fertility workup, counseling, surgery, as well as ovulation induction, and early pregnancy management are offered within the construct of the fellowship and residency at NYU. Barriers to care and ways to circumvent those barriers are discussed in detail. CONCLUSION: By utilizing the ambition and construct of the OB/GYN programs, we greatly improve care for an otherwise underserved patient population by offering an efficient and optimal infertility workup and treatment in a population that would otherwise be without care. We utilize the framework of graduate medical education to provide autonomy, experience, and mentorship to both residents and fellows in our programs in an effort to provide a solution to combating inequity in infertility care.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Hospitals, Public , Infertility/therapy , Reproductive Medicine/education , Adult , Education, Medical, Graduate , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Genetic Counseling , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Humans , Infertility/economics , Male , Middle Aged , New York City , Pregnancy , Reproductive Medicine/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics
15.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 38(5): 691-698, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30926176

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is ovulation suppression with progestins, requiring a freeze-all approach and subsequent frozen embryo transfer resulting from progestenic endometrial changes, cost-effective compared with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues (GnRH) during assisted reproduction cycles. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis derived from a PubMed literature search of average US costs of GnRH agonist and antagonist IVF cycles. RESULTS: In all fresh IVF cycle models, progestin cycles were more expensive owing to the additional costs of increased gonadotropin use, embryo freezing and subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET). The average cost per live birth with progestins ($32,466-$56,194) was higher than fresh IVF cycles with short (flare) GnRH agonist ($4,447-$12,797 higher) and GnRH antagonist ($1,542-$9,893 higher). When analyzing an initial embryo transfer plus additional FET in patients not initially pregnant, progestin cycles were still more expensive per live birth compared with conventional protocols. When planned freeze only cycles were analyzed, progestins became more cost-effective per live birth compared with antagonist cycles ($2,079 lower) but remained more expensive than short agonist cycles ($823 more expensive). CONCLUSIONS: Ovulation inhibition in IVF using progestins requires a freeze-only approach of embryos, and thus progestin use was not cost-effective compared with fresh embryo transfer cycles. Progestins, however, may be cost-effective compared with GnRH antagonist in planned freeze only cycles such as in preimplantation genetic testing or fertility preservation.


Subject(s)
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/economics , Ovulation Inhibition , Progestins/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans
16.
BJOG ; 126(2): 237-243, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30548407

ABSTRACT

Over 8 million babies have been born following IVF (in vitro fertilisation) and other artificial reproductive technology (ART) procedures since Louise Brown's birth 40 years ago. New innovations have added much complexity to both clinical and laboratory procedures over the last four decades. Translation of novel approaches from basic science into clinical practice continues unabated, widening the applicability of ART to new groups of people and helping improve both chances of healthy live birth and patient acceptability. However, the impact of ART on the health of both patients and their offspring continues to cause concern, and many ethical challenges created by new scientific developments in this field attract widely differing opinions. What is undeniable is that there will be a sustained global growth in utilisation of ART and that reproductive tourism will allow many people to access the treatment they desire notwithstanding national regulations that may forbid some approaches. The greatest challenge is to expand access to ART to those living in the less wealthy nations who are equally deserving of its benefits.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/trends , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Behavior , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics
17.
J Med Ethics ; 45(5): 346-350, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745435

ABSTRACT

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) 'add-ons' are therapeutic or diagnostic tools developed in an endeavour to improve the success rate of infertility treatment. However, there is no conclusive evidence that these interventions are a beneficial or effective adjunct of assisted reproductive technologies. Additionally, IVF add-ons are often implemented in clinical practice before their safety can be thoroughly ascertained. Yet, patients continue to request and pay large sums for such additional IVF tools. Hence, this essay set out to examine if it is ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it. In order to determine what is ethical-namely, morally good and righteous, the question was considered in relation to three key values of medical ethics-autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence. It was determined that providing IVF add-ons might be morally acceptable in specific circumstances, if true informed consent can be given, there is a potential of cost-effective physiological or psychological benefit and the risk of harm is minimal, particularly with regard to the unborn child.


Subject(s)
Commerce/ethics , Fertilization in Vitro/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Unnecessary Procedures/ethics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Fertility Agents/therapeutic use , Fertilization in Vitro/economics , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Health Care Costs , Humans , Morals , Patient Safety , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Treatment Outcome , Unnecessary Procedures/economics
18.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(6): 1041-1048, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127476

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens. METHODS: Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events. RESULTS: Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure. CONCLUSION: Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Specimen Handling , Female , Germ Cells/transplantation , Humans , Male , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics
19.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 34(2): e1312-e1322, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977557

ABSTRACT

In a system of managed competition, selective contracting and patient choice reward providers for quality improvements through increases in patient numbers and revenue. We research whether these mechanisms function as envisioned by investigating the relationship between quality improvements and patient numbers in assisted reproduction technology in the Netherlands. Success rate improvements primarily reduce volume as fewer secondary treatments are necessary, but this can be compensated by attracting new patients. Using nationwide registry data from 1996 to 2016, we find limited evidence that high-quality clinics attract new patients, and insufficiently as to compensate for the reduction in secondary treatments. The net effect of quality increases appears to be a small decline in revenue. Therefore, we conclude that patient choice and active purchasing reward quality improvements insufficiently. Nevertheless, clinics have improved quality drastically over the last years, showing that financial incentives are perhaps less important factors for quality improvements than factors such as intrinsic motivation and professional autonomy.


Subject(s)
Managed Competition/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Managed Competition/economics , Models, Statistical , Netherlands , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Quality Improvement/economics , Registries , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
20.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 51(2): 473-475, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121756

ABSTRACT

We hypothesised that use of reproductive technologies (RTs) would result in increases in economic and genetic gains of a dairy cattle breeding programme. A deterministic approach was used to compare RTs that can be utilised to increase dairy cattle productivity and profitability in Kenya. These were artificial insemination (AI), embryo transfer (ET) using old (ETOB) and young (ETYB) bulls and in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Natural mating (NAm) was assumed to be the standard reproduction practice in Kenya against which the genetic and economic efficiencies of the RTs were compared. A three tiers open nucleus system was assumed to describe the dairy cattle breeding programme in Kenya. It was open to use of imported semen in the nucleus. The nucleus was assumed to be closed to upward movement of live animals. This is the common practice in Kenya where large farms act as the nucleus from which the multipliers (medium-sized farms) buy replacement stock and subsequently sell replacement animals to the commercial sector (smallholder farms). The increase in monetary gain ranged between 11% when AI was used and 184% when utilising either juvenile ET or IVF. The ETYB and IVF resulted in similar economic and genetic responses for all comparison criteria. The generation interval reduced by between 0.8% in AI and 47% in ETYB and IVF technologies. The respective milk yield (MY) and daily weight gain (dWG) responses were between 25 to 150% and 0 to 110% for the AI and ETYB and IVF.


Subject(s)
Breeding/methods , Cattle/genetics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/veterinary , Animals , Breeding/economics , Dairying/methods , Embryo Transfer , Farms , Female , Insemination, Artificial/veterinary , Kenya , Male , Milk , Models, Theoretical , Reproduction , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Semen
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL