Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.701
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 56(3): 442-454, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284297

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Investigations about the interrelationships of nurses' safety climate, quality of care, and standard precautions (SP) adherence and compliance remain particularly scarce in the literature. Thus, we tested a model of the associations between nurses' safety climate, quality of care, and the factors influencing adherence and compliance with SPs utilizing the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design complying with STROBE guidelines. METHODS: Using convenience sampling, nurses (n = 730) from the Philippines were recruited. Data were collected between April and September 2022 using four validated self-report measures. Spearman Rho, mediation and path analyses, and SEM were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: Acceptable model fit indices were shown by the emerging model. The safety climate is positively associated with quality of care and factors influencing adherence to and compliance with SPs. Quality of care directly affected factors influencing adherence to SPs. The factors influencing adherence to SPs directly affected SP compliance. Quality of care mediated between safety climate and the factors influencing adherence to SPs. Factors influencing adherence to SPs mediated between safety climate, quality of care, and SP compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The study's variables are not distinct but overlapping nursing concepts that must be examined collectively. Nurse administrators can utilize the emerging model to formulate strategies and regulations for evaluating and enhancing nurses' safety climate, quality of care, and SP adherence and compliance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings may impact policymaking, organizational, and individual levels to improve nurses' clinical practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study had no patient contribution or public funding.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Philippines , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/standards , Male , Organizational Culture , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Universal Precautions/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Safety Management/standards
2.
Nurs Adm Q ; 48(3): 248-252, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848487

ABSTRACT

Patient falls within the hospital setting continue to be a significant challenge globally with almost one million hospital falls occurring in the U.S. annually. Recent calculations showed that the average total cost of a hospitalized patient fall was $62,521. One evidenced-based tool that has been shown to be effective is a colorful laminated poster, Fall TIPS poster, that was designed to engage and involve the patient in their fall prevention. One academic medical center utilized this implementation showing a successful return on investment (ROI). This project used a pre-post implementation design. After a successful pilot using the poster on one unit, the implementation was spread to all Adult Acute Care units (n = 10) within the institution. The outcome measures were fall and fall with injury counts and rates. The process measure was the completion of the fall prevention poster measured via audits. The calculation of ROI was completed using a four-step framework. The outcome data of fall and fall with injury showed a decrease from the pre-intervention months with both the fall count and rate decreasing by 23% and the fall with injury count and rate decreasing by 40%. The overall ROI calculation estimated an ROI of $982,700. The successful results from this project support the evidence that shows this program and the use of the Fall TIPS poster helps reduce patient falls within the hospital and yields a favorable ROI.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/economics , Humans , Pilot Projects , Safety Management/methods , Safety Management/economics , Safety Management/standards
3.
Int Nurs Rev ; 71(2): 1-11, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436471

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim was to investigate the interrelationships of nurses' safety climate, quality of care, and adherence to and compliance with standard precautions (SPs). BACKGROUND: Investigations about nurses' safety climate and quality care and their association with adherence to and compliance with SPs remain remarkably scant across literature, specifically among developing countries like the Philippines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design and structural equation modeling (SEM) approach while complying with STROBE guidelines. METHODS: Participant nurses were recruited using convenience sampling (n = 870). Four validated self-report instruments were used to collect data from February to August 2022. Spearman rho, SEM, mediation, and path analyses were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: The emerging model showed acceptable model fit parameters. The safety climate positively influenced the quality of care and adherence to and compliance with SPs. Quality of care directly affected adherence to SPs, while adherence to SPs directly affected compliance with SPs. The quality of care mediated the relationship between safety climate and adherence to SPs. Whereas adherence to SPs mediated the relationships between safety climate and compliance with SPs and the quality of care and compliance with SPs. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' safety climate directly affected the quality of care and SPs adherence and compliance. The quality of care mediated the impact of safety climate on SPs adherence. Finally, SPs adherence demonstrated a mediating effect among quality of care, safety climate, and SPs compliance. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY AND PRACTICE: Nursing policymakers and administrators can use the findings to design strategic policies and sustainable in-service educational courses fostering and maintaining nurses' safety climate, quality of care, and SPs adherence and compliance.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Philippines , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Quality of Health Care/standards , Male , Organizational Culture , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Latent Class Analysis , Safety Management/standards
4.
Transfus Med ; 33(5): 372-378, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668150

ABSTRACT

A more individualised donor selection policy was implemented in the UK in 2021, which replaced the previous 3-month deferral for men who have sex with men (MSM). Other blood services have a variety of policies in place to ensure the virological safety of blood components, ranging from an indefinite ban on MSM, to a defined period of exclusion, or to an individualised risk assessment that is not based on gender or sexual orientation. Justification of these policies should be based on scientific evidence including assessment of lengths of virological window periods, infectious disease epidemiology within donor populations and donation screening assay sensitivities. Developments in molecular technology and assays which can detect both antibodies and antigens in the very early stages of infection have significantly reduced the risk in most developed countries. However, the increasing usage of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent acquisition of HIV infection after possible high-risk sexual contact within the UK blood donor population has been recently noted. It has brought with it new diagnostic challenges within blood screening, notably possible non-detection of HIV RNA and serological markers following PrEP use despite potential infectivity. The use of other testing strategies such as detection of HIV DNA and screening for non-declared PrEP usage should be investigated further.


Subject(s)
Blood Donation , Blood Donors , HIV Infections , HIV , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Safety Management , Female , Humans , Male , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/virology , Homosexuality, Male , Risk Assessment , Sexual and Gender Minorities , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Safety Management/standards , Blood Donation/standards , HIV/isolation & purification , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
5.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(1)2021 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32400879

ABSTRACT

Several of the key organizational issues that we have had to face with the emergence of COVID-19 crisis are related to human factors/ergonomics (HFE) and the safety culture. During the crisis the main activities of the healthcare services have been profoundly affected. Patient safety and risk management units have also experienced the need to adapt rapidly. What can we do as HFE experts, now that the scenario has completely changed? We contend that: (a) we can favour and support the heuristics that are applied to manage the load of psycho-cognitive stress. (b) We can observe, collect strategies and develop analytic schemes, thereby creating a memory of the organization for improvement in the future. (c) And we can support in educating and engaging the public. This crisis has forced the community of healthcare experts to broaden their reflections: for the future to come, our communities of experts in the field of risk management HF/E, quality and safety of care and public health should play together an important role from the very beginning, from the time of peace.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Ergonomics , Infection Control/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , Hand Hygiene/standards , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Organizational Culture , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management/standards , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Ventilation/standards
6.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(1)2021 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nursing homes provide long-term care and have residential-oriented hospitalizations characterized by medical, nursing and social-care treatments for a typically geriatric population. In the current emergency phase, the problem of infections in residential structures for the elderly is taking on considerable importance in relation to the significant prevalence rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SAFETY IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES: Prevention and control measures for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in nursing homes should be planned before a possible outbreak of COVID-19 occurs and should be intensified during any exacerbation of the same. Each facility should identify a properly trained contact person-also external-for the prevention and control of infections, who can refer to a multidisciplinary support committee and who is in close contact with the local health authorities. The contact person should collaborate with professionals in order to prepare a prevention and intervention plan that considers national provisions and scientific evidence, the requirements for reporting patients with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and the indications for the management of suspected, probable or confirmed cases of COVID-19. DISCUSSION: Adequate risk management in residential structures implies the establishment of a coordination committee with dedicated staff, the implementation of a surveillance program for the rapid recognition of the outbreaks, the identification of suitable premises and equipment, the application of universal precautions, the adaptation of care plans to reduce the possibility of contagion among residents and the protection of operators and staff training initiatives.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Homes for the Aged/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , Homes for the Aged/standards , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Nursing Homes/standards , Pandemics , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management/standards
7.
South Med J ; 114(10): 636-639, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599341

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Firearms-related injuries and deaths are a leading cause of death in children and young adults ages 5 to 24 years. This study evaluated the counseling practices and barriers to providing safe firearms storage education by pediatricians and advance practice providers. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 296 pediatric outpatient providers in Houston, Texas. Pediatric providers were asked about demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and current practices regarding firearms safety counseling. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Survey respondents (N = 76) were 86% women and 87% physicians. Most (86%) agree that they should discuss firearms safety with parents, whereas only 32% report routine counseling. The most frequent barrier to providing education was insufficient time (63%), followed by unfamiliarity with guns (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric providers are interested in firearms safety counseling, but few incorporate it into their practice. Addressing barriers of time and comfort level around firearms are potential first steps to curbing a leading cause of injury death among children. Further research is needed to develop counseling methods that are time efficient and culturally competent for the pediatric office.


Subject(s)
Firearms/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pediatricians/psychology , Safety Management/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parenting/psychology , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Safety Management/standards , Safety Management/statistics & numerical data
8.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 304(2): 465-473, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904956

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Frailty is associated with a higher risk for negative postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to determine the association between the screening tool of the Dutch safety management system, Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (VMS) 'frail elderly' and postoperative complications in a gynecological population. METHODS: This cohort study included women aged 70 years or older, who were scheduled for any kind of gynecological surgery. VMS screening data (including risk for delirium, falling, malnutrition, and functional impairment) were extracted from the electronic patient records. VMS score could range between 0 and 4 patients with a VMS score of one or more were considered frail. Data on possible confounding factors and complications within 30 days after surgery, classified with the Clavien-Dindo classification, were collected. Regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 157 women were included with a median age of 74 years (inter quartile range 71-79). Most patients underwent prolapse surgery (52%) or hysterectomy (31%). Forty-one patients (26%) experienced any postoperative complication. Sixty-two patients (39%) were considered frail preoperatively by the VMS screening tool. Frailty measured with the VMS screening tool was not independently associated with postoperative complications in multivariable analysis (Odds ratio 1.18; 95% CI 0.49-2.82). However, a recent fall in the last 6 months (n = 208) was associated with postoperative complications (Odds ratio 3.90; 95% CI 1.57-9.66). CONCLUSION: An independent association between frailty, determined by the VMS screening tool 'Frail elderly', and postoperative complications in gynecological surgery patients could not be confirmed. A recent fall in the last 6 months seems associated with postoperative complications.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Safety Management/standards , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Safety Management/statistics & numerical data
9.
Air Med J ; 40(2): 112-114, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the frequent transfer of critically ill patients, yet there is little information available to assist critical care transport programs in protecting their clinicians from disease exposure in this unique environment. The Lifeline Critical Care Transport Program has implemented several novel interventions to reduce the risk of staff exposure. METHODS: Several safety interventions were implemented at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. These initiatives included the deployment of a transport safety officer, a receiving clean team for select interfacility transports, and modifications in personal protective equipment. RESULTS: From February 29, 2020, to August 29, 2020, there were 1,041 transports of persons under investigation, 660 (63.4%) of whom were ultimately found to be COVID-19 positive. Approximately one third were ground transports, 11 (1.1%) were by air, and the remainder were intrahospital transports. There were 0 documented staff exposures or illnesses during the study period. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of these safety measures resulted in 0 staff exposures or illnesses while maintaining a high-volume, high-acuity critical care transport program. These interventions are the first of their kind to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer a framework for other organizations and future disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Emergency Medical Services , Pandemics , Safety Management/standards , Transportation of Patients , Baltimore/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management/methods , Transportation of Patients/organization & administration
10.
Med Care ; 58(7): 594-600, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior research has found that adverse events have significant negative consequences for the patients (first victim) and caregivers (second victim) involved such as burnout. However, research has yet to examine the consequences of adverse events on members of caregiving units. We also lack research on the effects of the personal and job resources that shape the context of how adverse events are experienced. OBJECTIVES: We test the relationship between job demands (the number of adverse events on a hospital nursing unit) and nurses' experience of burnout. We further explore the ways in which personal (workgroup identification) and job (safety climate) resources amplify or dampen this relationship. Specifically, we examine whether, and the conditions under which, adverse events affect nurse burnout. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of survey data on nurse burnout linked to hospital incident reporting system data on adverse event rates for the year before survey administration and survey data on workgroup identification and safety climate. SUBJECTS: Six hundred three registered nurses from 30 nursing units in a large, urban hospital in the Midwest completed questionnaires. RESULTS: Multilevel regression analysis indicated that adverse events were positively associated with nurse burnout. The effects of adverse events on nurse burnout were amplified when nurses exhibited high levels of workgroup identification and attenuated when safety climate perceptions were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events have broader negative consequences than previously thought, widely affecting nurse burnout on caregiving units, especially when nurses strongly identify with their workgroup. These effects are mitigated when leaders cultivate safety climate.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/etiology , Nurses/psychology , Safety Management/standards , Social Identification , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Burnout, Professional/complications , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Medical Errors/psychology , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Organizational Culture , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Regression Analysis , Safety Management/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/standards , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
11.
Am J Public Health ; 110(5): 631-635, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191515

ABSTRACT

The passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 brought unprecedented changes in US workplaces, and the activities of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have contributed to a significant reduction in work-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses. Despite this, millions of workers are injured annually, and thousands killed.To reduce the toll, OSHA needs greater resources, a new standard-setting process, increased civil and criminal penalties, full coverage for all workers, and stronger whistleblower protections. Workers should not be injured or made sick by their jobs. To eliminate work injuries and illnesses, we must remake and modernize OSHA and restructure the relationship of employers and workers with the agency and each other.This includes changing the expectation of what employers must do to protect workers and implementing a requirement that firms have a "duty of care" to protect all people who may be harmed by their activities. Only by making major changes can we ensure that every worker leaves work as healthy as they were when their work shift began.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health/standards , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration , Workplace/standards , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Federal Government , Humans , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/standards , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/standards , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(1): 15-18, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740489

ABSTRACT

A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill health, regulations, social welfare conditions, and labour and industry activity in the sector. Profiles using the template were then produced for key aquaculture regions and nations across the globe where information could be obtained. These revealed both the scale and depth of occupational safety and health (OSH) challenges in terms of data gaps, a lack of or poor risk assessment and management, inadequate monitoring and regulation, and limited information generally about aquaculture OSH. Risks are especially high for offshore/marine aquaculture workers. Good practice as well as barriers to improving aquaculture OSH were noted. The findings from the profiles were brought together in an analysis of current knowledge on injury and work-related ill health, standards and regulation, non-work socioeconomic factors affecting aquaculture OSH, and the role of labour and industry in dealing with aquaculture OSH challenges. Some examples of governmental and labour, industry and non-governmental organisation good practice were identified. Some databases on injury and disease in the sector and research initiatives that solved problems were noted. However, there are many challenges especially in rural and remote areas across Asia but also in the northern hemisphere that need to be addressed. Action now is possible based on the knowledge available, with further research an important but secondary objective.


Subject(s)
Aquaculture , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Humans , Safety Management/standards
13.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(9): e13560, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the World Health Organization published "Medication Without Harm, WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge," to reduce patient harm caused by unsafe medication use practices. While the five objectives emphasise the need to create a framework for action, engaging key stakeholders and others, most published research has focused on the perspectives of health professionals. The aim was to explore the views and experiences of decision-makers in Qatar on organisational safety culture, medication errors and error reporting. METHOD: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare decision-makers (policy-makers, professional leaders and managers, lead educators and trainers) in Qatar. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling, continued to the point of data saturation. The interview schedule focused on: error causation and error prevention; engendering a safety culture; and initiatives to encourage error reporting. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and independently analysed by two researchers using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: From the 21 interviews conducted, key themes were the need to: promote trust within the organisation through articulating a fair blame culture; eliminate management, professional and cultural hierarchies; focus on team building, open communication and feedback; promote professional development; and scale-up successful initiatives. There was recognition that the current medication error reporting processes and systems were suboptimal, with suggested enhancements in themes of promoting a fair blame culture and open communication. CONCLUSION: These positive and negative aspects of organisational culture can inform the development of theory-based interventions to promote patient safety. Central to these will be the further development and sustainment of a "fair" blame culture in Qatar and beyond.


Subject(s)
Medical Errors/prevention & control , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Safety/standards , Safety Management/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Organizational Culture , Qatar , Quality of Health Care/standards
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 204, 2020 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32164745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia (ISSPA) were developed on behalf of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists and the World Health Organization. It has been recommend as an assessment tool that allows anesthetic providers in developing countries to assess their compliance and needs. This study was performed to describe the anesthesia service in one main public hospital during an 8-month medical mission in Cambodia and evaluate its anesthetic safety issues according to the ISSPA. METHODS: We conduct a retrospective study involving 1953 patients at the Preah Ket Mealea hospital. Patient demographics, anesthetic techniques, and complications were reviewed according to the registers of the anesthetic services and questionnaires. The inadequacies in personnel, facilities, equipment, medications, and conduct of anesthesia drugs were recorded using a checklist based on the ISSPA. RESULTS: A total of 1792 patients received general and regional anesthesia in the operating room, while 161 patients receiving sedation for gastroscopy. The patients' mean age was 45.0 ± 16.6 years (range, 17-87 years). The three most common surgical procedures were abdominal (52.0%; confidence interval [CI], 49.3-54.7), orthopedic (27.6%; CI, 25.2-29.9), and urological surgery (14.7%; CI, 12.8-16.6). General anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and brachial plexus block were performed in 54.3% (CI, 51.7-56.8), 28.2% (CI, 25.9-30.5), and 9.4% (CI, 7.9-10.9) of patients, respectively. One death occurred. Twenty-six items related to professional aspects, monitoring, and conduct of anesthesia did not meet the ISSPA-recommended standards. A lack of commonly used drugs and monitoring equipment was noted, posing major threats to the safety of anesthesia practice, especially in emergency situations. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the scarce literature on anesthesia practice in low- and middle-income countries such as Cambodia. Future medical assistance should help to strengthen these countries' inadequacies, allowing for the adoption of international standards for the safe practice of anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Developing Countries , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , Safety Management/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cambodia , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Medical Missions , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , World Health Organization , Young Adult
15.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(10): 878-901, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740998

ABSTRACT

A wealth of research demonstrates that work unit supervisors serve a critical function in protecting the safety and health of workers. A systematic review examined the effectiveness of workplace safety training interventions intended for various supervisor populations published from 2000 to 2019. A search of seven electronic databases was supplemented with hand searches from the reference lists of identified publications, relevant scientific journals, and the gray literature. This review included an assessment of the methodological quality using a modified version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. A total of 22 peer-reviewed studies met a set of inclusion criteria and were subsequently assessed for methodological quality. Training interventions were grouped into five topical domains: ergonomics, leadership, supervisor-worker interaction, injury, and disability management, and general safety education. Consistent evidence was found for the effectiveness of supervisory training interventions across several outcome measures. To our knowledge, this is the first study to synthesize the literature on supervisory training interventions in the area of occupational safety. While the results are encouraging, they must be viewed with caution due to the fact that the methodological rigor of the reviewed studies was low.


Subject(s)
Inservice Training/methods , Occupational Health/education , Personnel Management , Safety Management/methods , Workplace/organization & administration , Adult , Ergonomics , Female , Humans , Inservice Training/standards , Leadership , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Safety Management/organization & administration , Safety Management/standards , Workplace/standards
16.
BMC Fam Pract ; 21(1): 116, 2020 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576144

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medication error at transitions of care is common. The implementation of medicines reconciliation processes to improve this issue has been recommended by many regulatory and safety organisations. The aim of this study was to gain insight from healthcare professionals on the barriers and facilitators to the medicines reconciliation implementation process. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Ireland with a wide range of healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved with medicines reconciliation at transitions of care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an adaptation of a combined theoretical framework of Grol, Cabana and Sluisveld to classify the barriers and facilitators to implementation of medicines reconciliation. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were interviewed, including eleven community pharmacists (CPs), eight hospital pharmacists (HPs), nine hospital consultants (HCs), five general practitioners (GPs), and two non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs). Themes were categorized into barriers and facilitators. Barriers included resistance from existing professional cultures, staff interest and training, poor communication and minimal information and communications technology (ICT) support. Solutions (facilitators) suggested included supporting effective multidisciplinary teams, greater involvement of pharmacists in medicines reconciliation, ICT solutions (linked prescribing databases, decision support systems) and increased funding to provide additional (e.g. admission and discharge reconciliation) and more advanced services (e.g. community pharmacist delivered medicines use review). CONCLUSIONS: Medicines reconciliation is advocated as a solution to the known problem of medication error at transitions of care. This study identifies the key challenges and potential solutions that policy makers, managers and HCPs should consider when reviewing the practices and processes of medicines reconciliation in their own organisations.


Subject(s)
Communication Barriers , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , General Practitioners , Hospitalists , Medication Errors , Medication Reconciliation , Patient Transfer , Pharmacists , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Ireland , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Medication Reconciliation/organization & administration , Medication Reconciliation/standards , Patient Discharge/standards , Patient Transfer/methods , Patient Transfer/standards , Qualitative Research , Safety Management/methods , Safety Management/standards
17.
Pediatr Radiol ; 50(10): 1409-1420, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Common cause analysis of hospital safety events that involve radiology can identify opportunities to improve quality of care and patient safety. OBJECTIVE: To study the most frequent system failures as well as key activities and processes identified in safety events in an academic children's hospital that underwent root cause analysis and in which radiology was determined to play a contributing role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All safety events involving diagnostic or interventional radiology from April 2013 to November 2018, for which the hospital patient safety department conducted root cause analysis, were retrospectively analyzed. Pareto charts were constructed to identify the most frequent modalities, system failure modes, key processes and key activities. RESULTS: In 19 safety events, 64 sequential interactions were attributed to the radiology department by the patient safety department. Five of these safety events were secondary to diagnostic errors. Interventional radiology, radiography and diagnostic fluoroscopy accounted for 89.5% of the modalities in these safety events. Culture and process accounted for 55% of the system failure modes. The three most common key processes involved in these sequential interactions were diagnostic (39.1%) and procedural services (25%), followed by coordinating care and services (18.8%). The two most common key activities were interpreting/analyzing (21.9%) and coordinating activities (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Proposing and implementing solutions based on the analysis of a single safety event may not be a robust strategy for process improvement. Common cause analyses of safety events allow for a more robust understanding of system failures and have the potential to generate more specific process improvement strategies to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors. Our analysis demonstrated that the most common system failure modes in safety events attributed to radiology were culture and process. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited given our small sample size. Aligning with other children's hospitals to use standard safety event terminology and shared databases will likely lead to greater clarity on radiology's direct and indirect contributions to patient harm.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/standards , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Radiology Department, Hospital/standards , Root Cause Analysis , Safety Management/standards , Humans , Organizational Culture , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies
18.
Euro Surveill ; 25(36)2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914748

ABSTRACT

Europe-wide activities to improve biosafety and biosecurity performed within the frameworks of the European Union (EU)-funded Joint Actions EMERGE and QUANDHIP led to the development of an Integrated European Checklist for Laboratory Biorisk Management (ECL).To better understand different approaches shaping biorisk management (BRM) systems on an operational level in high containment laboratories, the ECL was used to map the implementation of BRM in 32 high containment laboratories in 18 countries in Europe. The results suggest that the BRM elements referring to standard microbiological working practices and the handling of infectious material were fulfilled particularly well. The elements safety exercises involving internal and external emergency responders, and appropriate decommissioning plans were not fulfilled particularly well. BRM in Biosafety Level (BSL) 4 laboratories handling Risk Group (RG) 4 viruses appear to vary among each other less than BSL3 laboratories handling RG 3 bacteria. It is important to agree on comparable regulations in Europe as high containment laboratories are indispensable for a safe, quick and effective response to public health threats. As high containment laboratories may also present a public health risk it is crucial to have robust BRM on organisational and operational levels.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Containment of Biohazards/methods , Containment of Biohazards/standards , Laboratories/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , Safety Management/standards , European Union , Humans , Safety Management/methods
19.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 36(9): 703-710, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030117

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has demonstrated a need for an infectious disease standard that will promote a safe and healthy work environment and assure business continuity. The current pandemic has revealed gaps in workplace preparedness and employee protections to microbial exposures. Federal and state government agencies have responded by providing interim guidelines and stop-gap measures that continue to evolve and vary in approach and required controls. This interim and inconsistent approach has resulted in confusion on the part of businesses as they work toward reopening during the pandemic and uncertainty as to the efficacy of required or suggested controls. Moving forward, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration, with guidance from the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, should establish consistent and effective strategies through a nationwide standard to address the potential microbial exposures in the workplace. Such a standard will require effective worker protections from infectious diseases and assure business continuity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Guidelines as Topic , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Safety Management/methods , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Communicable Diseases , Humans , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Pandemics , Safety Management/standards , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
20.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur ; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)2020 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32012498

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to assess the association between shift schedule realignment and patient safety culture. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using difference in differences model, BIMC Hospitals and Siloam Hospital Bali were compared before and after shift schedule realignment to test the association between shift schedule realignment and patient safety culture. FINDINGS: Shift schedule realignment was associated with a significant improvement in staffing (coefficient 1.272; 95% CI 0.842 - 1.702; p<0.001), teamwork within units (coefficient 1.689; 95% CI 1.206 - 2.171; p<0.001), teamwork across units (coefficient 1.862; 95% CI 1.415 - 2.308; p<0.001), handoffs and transitions (coefficient 0.999; 95% CI 0.616 - 1.382; p<0.001), frequency of error reported (coefficient 1.037; 95% CI 0.581 - 1.493; p<0.001), feedback and communication about error (coefficient 1.412; 95% CI 0.982 - 1.841; p<0.001) and communication openness (coefficient 1.393; 95% CI 0.968 - 1.818; p<0.001). PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: With positive impact on patient safety culture, shift schedule realignment should be considered as quality improvement initiative. It stretches the compressed workload suffered by staff while maintaining 40 h per week in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Shift schedule realignment, designed to improve patient safety culture, has never been implemented in any Indonesian private hospital. Other hospital managers might also appreciate knowing about the shift schedule realignment to improve the patient safety culture.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/organization & administration , Hospitals, Private/organization & administration , Patient Safety/standards , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Safety Management/standards , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Indonesia , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL