ABSTRACT
Snoring is a very common human habit, and for this reason it is considered more a social nuisance that a disease symptom. The nasal valve area has the minimal cross-sectional area of the upper airways. A problem at this level may easily induce impaired breathing and consequently snoring, therefore nasal dilation might significantly improve this complaint. Nas-Air® is a new internal nasal dilator which was tested on 41 outpatients who snore. Snoring duration, assessed by smartphone, visual analogue scale for the perception of sleep quality were measured before and during Nas-Air® use. A significant reduction of snoring time and an improvement of sleep quality were achieved during Nas-Air® wearing. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that Nas-Air® is an internal nasal dilator able to reduce snoring time and improve sleep quality.
Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Nasal Cavity/anatomy & histology , Snoring/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Sleep/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an alternative second-line treatment option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In our substudy of a previous multicentre study of patients implanted with UAS, we focused on patient-related outcomes like Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), snoring and personal satisfaction 6 and 12 months after the implantation. METHODS: 60 patients, who were initially non-adherent to CPAP and implanted with UAS, were included in a prospective multicentre study. Data were collected preoperative, 6 and 12 months after implantation regarding FOSQ, ESS, snoring, and their experience with the UAS device. RESULTS: Besides relevant Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) reduction, we saw significant improvements in ESS (p < 0.001), FOSQ (p < 0.001) and snoring under UAS therapy. A strong correlation between AHI results postoperative and the personal satisfaction of the patients after implantation was found as well as between usage results and AHI compared to the preoperative results. CONCLUSION: The more the patients benefit from UAS according to their self-reported outcome, the higher is the therapy use.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Female , Germany , Humans , Larynx/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Prospective Studies , Self Report , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although not a disease, primary snoring often leads to social problems. In an earlier retrospective pilot study, we found hints that individuals were snoring less in a lateral versus a supine head position. The aim of this study is to elucidate on the effect of an anti-snoring pillow which changes the head position. METHODS: We designed an interventional, controlled, and randomized crossover study. It included 22 participants, between 18 and 78 years, who snored, had a BMI ≤ 30, and a sleep partner. Obstructive sleep apnea was ruled out by polysomnography (PSG) or by respiratory polygraphy (PG). Two potential participants dropped out. The first two phases were done at home (4 weeks in total), followed by two nights of polysomnography in our sleep laboratory. During all phases, questionnaires regarding snoring, sleep quality, and pillow tolerance were completed by the patients and, as relevant, by their partners. RESULTS: The PSG parameters revealed a significant reduction in the snoring index (p = 0.03) when on the activated pillow without a deterioration in other respiratory parameters. This correlated well with the visual analog scale (VAS) that showed a significant decrease in snoring with the activated pillow according to the bed partners (p < 0.001). Subjective acceptance of the pillow during the study period was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that by using a pillow to change the head position, it is possible to reduce both subjective and objective snoring severity. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: DRKS 00008744 AND ETHICS COMMISSION REGISTRY NUMBER REGISTRY NUMBER 2013-406 M-MA.
Subject(s)
Bedding and Linens , Head , Posture , Snoring/prevention & control , Snoring/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Snoring/therapyABSTRACT
Our aim was to evaluate the long-term objective and subjective results of a modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) technique in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Single center prospective study of 35 patients underwent an ESP as a primary surgical treatment between June 2012 and September 2015 at the hospital AZ Sint-Jan Bruges-Ostend. Patients were divided into non-OSAS and OSAS (AHI >5). Primary outcome parameters were the Epworth Sleeping Scale (ESS, reduction and score less then 10) and the Visual Analogue Score of snoring (VAS, assessed by partner) evaluated at 3 months and 1 year. In addition, the OSAS group underwent a polysomnography after 6 months to calculate the Apneu-Hypopneu Index (AHI) change. Secondary outcome parameters were possible complications and morbidity rate. The overall Epworth Sleepiness Scale showed a steady total reduction of, respectively, 42 and 48% at the two timepoints. All patients had a post-operative score of less than ten points. The Visual Analogue Score improved in 92% of the patients; of these, the snoring was reduced in 86% and disappeared in 6%. In the OSAS group, we noticed a reduction in AHI of more than 50 in 53% of the patients. A considerable reduction was found in the severe OSAS group, where we found a mean pre-operative average AHI of 41.3/h that was reduced 6 months after the operation to 17.4/h. There were no severe complications or increased morbidity rate observed. This first long-term study shows that the modified ESP seems to be a safe and promising technique in palatal surgery for patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Surgical effectiveness is sustained after 1 year, both in OSAS as in snoring pathology. The technique seems as approachable for the basic ENT surgeon as the uvulopalatopharynoplasty.
Subject(s)
Pharynx/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Prospective Studies , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Snoring/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate objective changes of snoring after surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and correlate these with changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: A novel measurement, Snore Map, was used to analyse full-night snore sounds in terms of the maximal/mean intensity, peak/mean frequency, snoring index and energy type (Snore Map type, 0-4). Snore sound was classified into three bands according to frequency energy spectrum: B1 (40-300 Hz), B2 (301-850 Hz) and B3 (851-2000 Hz). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four male and two female OSA patients (mean age, 39 years; mean AHI, 53.1/h; mean body mass index, 26.8 kg/m(2) ) with favourable anatomic structure were consecutively enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parameters of polysomnographies and Snore Maps at baseline and six months after operation were compared. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed this study. The mean reduction in the total-snoring index was insignificant but there were significant decreases in total mean intensity, total peak frequency, total mean frequency and Snore Map type after surgery. There were also significant decreases in the mean intensity in all three bands, the snoring index in B2/B3 and the mean frequency in B1 postoperatively. Changes in the total mean intensity, total mean frequency, B2 mean intensity and B3 snoring index positively correlated with change in the AHI. CONCLUSIONS: Relocation pharyngoplasty significantly decreases both the snoring sound intensity and snoring frequency. These reductions are directly proportional to the improvement of OSA.
Subject(s)
Pharynx/surgery , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Snoring/prevention & control , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Polysomnography , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/physiopathology , TonsillectomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Snoring in children is a prevalent symptom and may be an indicator of obstructive sleep apnoea. Despite its importance, there is no national guideline on its appropriate management. OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for the management of snoring in children and adolescents treated in a primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 16 national paediatric sleep experts were included in a Delphi process and formulated recommendations in the form of a step-wise work-up procedure. RESULTS: The following 8 steps were developed: (1) Identification of true cases of habitual snoring. (2) Identification of high-risk patients who should undergo polysomnography in a sleep laboratory. (3) Identification of mild cases that may be treated with anti-inflammatory medication. (4) Identification of cases that should be referred to an otorhinolaryngologist for potential surgery. (5) Performance of polysomnography in cases that remain unclear despite steps 3 and 4 to rule out obstructive sleep apnoea. (6) Reconsideration of surgery in cases with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea. (7) Identification of severe sleep apnoea cases requiring continuous positive airway pressure therapy. (8) Identification of cases suitable for orthodontic treatment, craniofacial surgery or speech therapy. CONCLUSION: This guideline should help to improve the management of snoring children and adolescents in Germany.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Otolaryngology/standards , Polysomnography/standards , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/diagnosis , Snoring/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Germany , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Snoring/etiologyABSTRACT
Sleep-related breathing disorders, encompassing snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), are highly prevalent worldwide, and there have been important advances in recent years regarding the understanding of underlying pathophysiology mechanisms, diagnosis, and improvement in therapeutic options. The precision medicine and person-centered approaches are based on the concept that every individual is unique and a myriad of elements influence the likelihood of developing the disease, the signs and symptoms expressed, the response to different treatment modalities, and the susceptibility to complications. Thus, health and disease are the result of phenotypic outcomes resulting from interactions between biological factors, environment, and lifestyle.
Subject(s)
Precision Medicine , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/prevention & control , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/prevention & control , Snoring/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the long-term effects of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA) performed to the inferior concha on snoring, apnea index, and daytime sleepiness symptoms in patients who presents with the complaint of snoring and mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2009 and May 2011, 50 patients (29 females, 21 males; mean age 40.7 years; range 19 to 64 years) who had witnessed sleep apnea and diagnosed with mild OSAS as assessed by polysomnographic analysis in our clinic were included in the study. Twenty-five patients with the history of witnessed sleep apnea underwent sleep analysis using conventional polysomnography (PSG), while portable PSG device was used in other 25 patients. During the follow-up visits, all patients who underwent tissue ablation using RF were assessed by the baseline examination method. Following the polysomnographic analysis, RFTA was performed to the inferior concha of all patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 18.7 months (range 6-26 months). In the group who underwent conventional PSG, the mean pre-treatment apnea-hipopnea index (AHI) was 11.356±2.9841, while the mean post-treatment AHI was 9.93±2.822. In the group who underwent portable PSG, the mean pre-treatment AHI was 9.196±3.2696, whereas the mean post-treatment AHI was 8.04±3.241. In two patients (4%), inferior concha ulceration was detected. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency used in the treatment of mild OSAS results in better patient compliance and post-treatment patient comfort, as well as lower post-treatment morbidity and complication rate, compared to conventional surgical techniques.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Turbinates/surgery , Adult , Catheter Ablation/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent breathing disorder. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of preoperative screening and subsequent treatment for OSA on the health of patients. METHODS: We conducted a two-year follow-up study of patients previously enrolled in a large prospective study in which patients were given the STOP questionnaire for OSA screening (n = 2,467). All patients who underwent a polysomnography were considered eligible (n = 211) and were asked to complete a paper-based mailed questionnaire. The severity of OSA, comorbidities, and treatment modalities and their effects were evaluated from the returned questionnaire. Research ethics board approval was obtained and returning the questionnaire implied informed patient consent. RESULTS: The response rate was 67%. One hundred twenty-eight (82%) of the 156 patients who responded had OSA established by polysomnography. Among these 128 patients with OSA, 88 (69%) were prescribed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and 40 (31%) were prescribed other (non-CPAP) treatment. Among those 88 patients receiving CPAP, 40 (45%) were compliant and 48 (55%) were non-compliant. The CPAP compliant patients had a greater reduction in medication for comorbidities than the CPAP non-compliant or the other treatment group (38% vs 3% vs 0%, respectively; P < 0.001). A significant improvement in snoring, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness was reported by CPAP compliant users compared with CPAP non-compliant or other treatment groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative patients who were identified to have OSA and were compliant with CPAP use may have health benefits in terms of improved snoring, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness. Timely diagnosis and treatment compliance may reduce symptoms of OSA and severity of associated comorbidities along with a reduction in medications.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Patient Compliance , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/etiology , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Objective: This study reports our experience in a selected cohort of patients affected by mild-moderate OSAS, without tonsillar obstruction, and treated with pharyngoplasty. Methods: In a case-control retrospective study, we compared modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (MESP) to modified barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (MBRP) in adult patients with oropharyngeal transversal collapse with a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, and mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical evaluation, including collection of anthropometric data and sleep endoscopy, was performed. Six months after surgery, symptoms recording, clinical evaluation and polysomnography (PSG) were repeated. Results: We enrolled 20 patients: 10 treated with MESP and 10 treated with MBRP. Mean apnoea-hypoapnoea index (AHI) was 22.8 (± 5.63). We observed in both groups a significant reduction of AHI and oropharyngeal obstruction (p = 0.01), with a success rate, according with Sher's criteria, of 90% for MESP and 80% for MBRP, respectively. Post-surgical pain and snoring reduction were significantly lower with MBRP. Conclusions: We recorded similar success rates for both techniques. MBRP may be considered better than MESP due to less surgical time, no potential mucosal damage, absence of knots, and faster recovery with less pain.
Subject(s)
Pharynx , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Humans , Pharynx/physiopathology , Pharynx/surgery , Polysomnography , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Snoring/prevention & control , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Literature suggests that patients without pre-existing sleep-related breathing disorders who undergo orthognathic surgery for treatment of facial asymmetry may experience changes in their oropharyngeal airway. Mandibular retropositioning can compromise the posterior airway space, alter the physiologic airflow through the upper airway, and predispose patients to development of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 26 patients who underwent mandibular retropositioning with or without maxillary advancement within the past 5 years at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine. Pre- and postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed with digital DOLPHIN software (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA) for evidence of changes to the posterior airway dimension. In addition, patients were evaluated postoperatively with SNAP polysomnography (model 4/6; SNAP Laboratories, Wheeling, IL) for evidence of OSAS. RESULTS: Results indicated that mandibular retropositioning greater than or equal to 5 mm decreased the posterior airway space below 11 mm (30.75%, P = .03) and showed evidence of soft palate elongation greater than 32 mm (15.39%, P = .037) in a significant number of patients. However, as determined by cephalometric analysis, mandibular retropositioning greater than or equal to 5 mm in combination with maxillary advancement had no significant effect on the posterior airway space or soft palate. CONCLUSION: Postoperative SNAP polysomnography showed higher incidence of mild to moderate OSAS in patients who underwent mandibular retropositioning greater than or equal to 5 mm (69.25%) compared with patients who underwent mandibular retropositioning in combination with maxillary advancement (38.46%, P = .039).
Subject(s)
Mandible/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology , Cephalometry , Cohort Studies , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Humans , Hyoid Bone/pathology , Palate, Soft/pathology , Pharynx/pathology , Polysomnography , Retrospective Studies , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/prevention & control , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
Orofacial biofunction comprises muscular and physical effects, which may contribute to stabilization of the oropharyngeal airway. The tongue-repositioning manoeuvre (TRM) provides physical stabilization of the tongue and the soft palate together with, as a prerequisite, a nasal breathing mode. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a TRM treatment concept on primary snoring. The TRM was used to achieve a closed biofunctional rest position of the orofacial system and to re-educate the nasal breathing pattern. Pressure indicating oral shields were used for home exercises as a biofeedback instrument and to support nocturnal mouth closure. Treatment was undertaken on 125 consecutive primary snorers [101 males, mean age 52.4 years, range 34-75, mean body mass index (BMI) 28.1, range 18.9-38.5, and 24 females, mean age 55.2 years, range 36-70, mean BMI 26.8, range 22.7-31.9]. Bed partner ranking was performed, and snoring was judged using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS score was 8.4 (range 6-10) before treatment and decreased to 4.1 (range 0-10) after treatment [mean observation time 4.6 months (1-10)]. Analysis of variance showed a significant influence of treatment in subjects with a normal body weight (BMI 18.5-25). The data provide evidence that dynamic stabilization of the orofacial system with the TRM in conjunction with nocturnal wear of an oral shield is beneficial for reducing the symptoms in primary snorers with a normal BMI.
Subject(s)
Feedback, Psychological/physiology , Myofunctional Therapy/methods , Occlusal Splints , Snoring/therapy , Tongue/physiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharynx/anatomy & histology , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Physical Therapy Modalities , Snoring/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Due to the frequency of this phenomenon and the often considerable distress caused to the affected person, competent advice, diagnosis and treatment of snoring in adults is of particular importance. The aim of this guideline is to promote high-quality medical care for patients affected by this problem. According to the three-level concept of the AWMF, it corresponds to an S1 guideline. Prior to any therapeutic intervention, relevant sleep medical history, clinical examination, as well as a mandatory objective diagnostic measure are performed. Snoring is only treated if the patient asks for it. In general, invasive methods should be viewed critically and the patient should be advised correspondingly. In the case of surgical therapy, minimally invasive techniques are preferred. Reducing body weight (in the case of overweight snorers), abstinence from alcohol, nicotine and sleep medication, as well as maintaining a healthy sleep-wake cycle can be recommended from a sleep-medicine perspective, although convincing clinical studies are not yet available. Since evidence for the effectiveness of muscle stimulation or various methods for toning and training of the muscles of the floor of mouth is not available, these methods are not recommended. Snoring can be successfully treated with the use of an intraoral device; however, careful patient selection is important. Avoiding a supine position during sleep can be helpful in some cases. Only limited data is available on the success rates of the surgical approaches and long term data is often lacking, and not all techniques have been sufficiently evaluated from a scientific point of view. Nasal surgery is only indicated if the patient suffers from nasal obstruction. Extensive data supports the effectiveness of laser-assisted resection of excessive soft palate tissue (laser-assisted uvuloplasty, LAUP). In principle, however, such resections can be performed using other techniques. Placebo-controlled studies were able to prove the effectiveness of radiofrequency surgery of the soft palate. A reduction in snoring could also be achieved in many cases by means of soft palate implants with minimal post-operative morbidity. The indication for tonsillectomy and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty should be made cautiously due to the comparatively high morbidity associated with these procedures.
Subject(s)
Otolaryngology/standards , Snoring/diagnosis , Snoring/prevention & control , Adult , Germany , HumansABSTRACT
This article describes a snore reduction appliance that can be constructed to advance and hold the mandible in a comfortable prognathic position. The tongue is advanced concomitantly, producing more space in the pharynx while changing the relative positions of the soft palate, posterior tongue, and pharyngeal walls to reduce the incidence of snoring and ameliorate sleep apnea. A dual-laminate appliance, soft inside and hard outside, is vacuformfitted to casts of the maxillary and mandibular teeth and luted in a protrusive relation with cold pressure-cured acrylic. The appliance maintains the mandible and tongue in a protrusive position to open the upper airway, reducing snoring and facilitating breathing. Edentulous patients would require implant-retained appliances for appropriate retention and stability.
Subject(s)
Occlusal Splints , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Snoring/prevention & control , Adult , Dental Impression Technique , Female , Humans , Jaw Relation Record , Male , Mandible , Mandibular Advancement/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A snore reduction appliance can be constructed for the atrophic mandibular edentulous patient. Two endosseous implants can be surgically placed that retain a complete mandibular denture and, in turn, an overlying bimaxillary removable snore reduction appliance. A dual laminate appliance is vacu-form fitted to the maxillary teeth and the mandibular denture and luted in a protrusive relation with cold cure acrylic. The appliance maintains the mandible in a protrusive position to open the upper airway to reduce snoring.
Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Denture, Complete, Lower , Jaw, Edentulous/complications , Mandibular Advancement/instrumentation , Occlusal Splints , Snoring/prevention & control , Aged , Female , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Snoring/complicationsSubject(s)
Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Otolaryngology/education , Polysomnography/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/etiology , Snoring/prevention & control , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/prevention & control , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Snoring/diagnosis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Oral appliance (OAm) therapy has demonstrated efficacy in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this systematic review was to clarify the efficacy of device designs (Mono-block or Bi-block) in OAm therapy for OSA patients. We performed a meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Two studies (Mono-block OAm versus Bi-block OAm) remained eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. When comparing Mono-block OAm and Bi-block OAm, Mono-block OAm significantly reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (2.92; 95% confidence interval (95%CI), 1.26 to 4.58; p = 0.0006), and patient preference for Mono-block OAm was significantly higher (2.06; 95%CI, 1.44 to 2.06; p < 0.0001). Lowest SpO2, arousal index, non-REM stage 3, sleep efficiency, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Snoring Scale, and side effects were not significantly different between the two groups (lowest SpO2: -11.18; 95%CI, -26.90 to 4.54; p = 0.16, arousal index: 4.40; 95%CI, -6.00 to 14.80; p = 0.41, non-REM stage 3: -2.00; 95%CI, -6.00 to 14.80; p = 0.41, sleep efficiency: -1.42, 95%CI, -4.71 to 1.86; p = 0.40, ESS: 0.12; 95%CI, -1.55 to 1.79; p = 0.89, Snoring Scale: 0.55; 95%CI, -0.73 to 1.83, p = 0.55, side effects: 1.00, 95%CI, 0.62 to 1.61, p = 1.00). In this systematic review, the use of Mono-block OAm was more effective than Bi-block OAm for OSA patients.