Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 100
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1316, 2020 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32867731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are a leading cause of reduced work functioning. It is not known which factors are associated with reduced work functioning in people with moderate MUPS. Insight in these factors can contribute to prevention of reduced work functioning, associated work-related costs and in MUPS becoming chronic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify which demographic and health-related factors are associated with reduced work functioning, operationalized as impaired work performance and absenteeism, in people with moderate MUPS. METHODS: Data of 104 participants from an ongoing study on people with moderate MUPS were used in this cross-sectional study. Ten independent variables were measured at baseline to determine their association with reduced work functioning: severity of psychosocial symptoms (four domains, measured with the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire), physical health (RAND 36-Item Health Survey), moderate or vigorous physical activity (Activ8 activity monitor), age, sex, education level and duration of complaints. Two separate multivariable linear regression analyses were performed with backward stepwise selection, for both impaired work performance and absenteeism. RESULTS: Absenteeism rate rose with 2.5 and 0.6% for every increased point on the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire for domain 'depression' (B = 0.025, SE = 0.009, p = .006) and domain 'somatization' (B = 0.006, SE = 0.003, p = .086), respectively. An R2 value of 0.118 was found. Impaired work performance rate rose with 0.2 and 0.5% for every increased point on the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire for domain 'distress' (B = 0.002, SE = 0.001, p = .084) and domain 'somatization' (B = 0.005, SE = 0.001, p < .001), respectively. An R2 value of 0.252 was found. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of distress, probability of a depressive disorder and probability of somatization are positively associated with higher rates of reduced work functioning in people with moderate MUPS. To prevent long-term absenteeism and highly impaired work performance severity of psychosocial symptoms seem to play a significant role. However, because of the low percentage of explained variance, additional research is necessary to gain insight in other factors that might explain the variance in reduced work functioning even better.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Employment/psychology , Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Work Performance/economics , Work Performance/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Epilepsy Behav ; 98(Pt A): 195-200, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31377661

ABSTRACT

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are known to be associated with significant costs of healthcare services. Here, we report the impact of psychotherapy on behavior surrounding healthcare utilization and the potential economic benefits associated with long-term seizure control. METHODS: This retrospective study describes patients seen between 2010 and 2016 at the epilepsy clinic at Glostrup University Hospital in Denmark and offered a psychotherapeutic treatment program for PNES. Forty-two patients were interviewed about seizure outcome 12-24 months after psychotherapy, and the annual changes in healthcare utilization and associated costs of services provided in a period of 24 months before and up to 24 months after treatment were compared. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, 83% of the patients had achieved above 50% reduction in seizures. The 24-month pretreatment costs compared with the 24-month posttreatment costs directly associated with seizures dropped by 95.8%, and total healthcare costs were reduced by 63%. Estimation of annual savings from the program comes to 1060 € per patient. An association was found between seizure rate and number of healthcare contacts. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the evidence that psychotherapy is a cost-effective way of treating PNES. The economic benefits from this form of intervention appear not only to diminish costs directly associated with PNES, but also healthcare utilization in general.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Psychotherapy , Seizures/therapy , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/economics , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Young Adult
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 19(1): 307, 2019 10 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31640632

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persistent physical symptoms (PPS), also known as medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), affect approximately 50% of patients in secondary care and are often associated with disability, psychological distress and increased health care costs. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has demonstrated both short- and long-term efficacy with small to medium effect sizes for PPS, with larger treatment effects for specific PPS syndromes, including non-cardiac chest pain, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Research indicates that PPS conditions share similar cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms, such as avoidance and unhelpful beliefs. This suggests that a transdiagnostic approach may be beneficial for patients with PPS. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a transdiagnostic CBT-based intervention for PPS. 322 participants with PPS will be recruited from secondary care clinics. Participants stratified by clinic and disability level will be randomised to CBT plus standard medical care (SMC) versus SMC alone. The intervention consists of 8 CBT sessions delivered by a qualified therapist over a period of 20 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at 9, 20, 40- and 52-weeks post randomisation. Efficacy will be assessed by examining the difference between arms in the primary outcome Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 52 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include mood, symptom severity and clinical global impression at 9, 20, 40 and 52 weeks. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated by combining measures of health service use, informal care, loss of working hours and financial benefits at 52 weeks. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide a powered evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a transdiagnostic CBT approach versus SMC for patients with PPS. It will also provide valuable information about potential healthcare pathways for patients with PPS within the National Health Service (NHS). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426788. Registered 27 April 2015. Overall trial status: Ongoing; Recruitment status: No longer recruiting.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Secondary Care/methods , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Secondary Care/economics , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , State Medicine , Treatment Outcome
4.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 69(7): 275-282, 2019 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30326538

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depressive comorbidity is common with physically ill inpatients and is associated with many negative medical and economic effects (e. g., increased morbidity and mortality, increased length of stay, poorer quality of life and increased utilization of health services). The aim of this study is to clarify the question whether the additional costs caused by comorbid depressive diseases are recovered by additional G-DRG-specific revenues in order to finance necessary diagnostics and therapies of this comorbidity. METHODS: We analysed the revenues generated by depressive secondary diagnoses. Consequently, we selected patients with relevant F-diagnoses according to ICD-10 from billing data of the University Hospital Greifswald between 2010 and 2014. We recoded each case without a comorbid depression, taking into account the specifications of the relevant accounting year. Subsequently, the revenues with and without coding the comorbidity were compared (n=6,563). RESULTS: In 115 out of 6,563 patients (1.75%), mainly with unspecific recurrent depressions, the documentation and coding of a comorbid depression led to a change in the proceeds. Taking into account the applicable base rate between 2010 and 2014, the coding leads to an additional revenue of 216,737.01 Euro for the entire observation period. This corresponds to an increase of approximately 1,885 Euro per patient (n=115). In relation to the total number of patients with comorbid depressions (n=6,563) it is a surplus of 33.02 Euro. However, predominantly unspecific depressive diagnoses (e. g., F 32.8) are encoded, which do not increase the level of severity in the DRG system and, thus, have no effect on the proceeds. DISCUSSION: In very few cases, the inclusion of depressive comorbidities leads to an increase in revenue. Only some depressive diagnoses have a CCL. Due to the relatively low CCL (1 or 2), depressive comorbidities often show no effect on PCCL of multimorbid patients. Currently there is no adequate financial incentive for the hospitals to recognize and treat depressions, since the additional costs do not lead to increased revenues. In the context of a systemic treatment, depression will have to be taken into account more strongly in the financing system, especially in view of the numerous negative effects of this comorbidity.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/economics , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/psychology
5.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 21(2): 59-69, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29961045

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Somatoform disorders are highly prevalent mental disorders causing impairment and large economic burden. In order to improve the diagnosis and management of affected patients, a health care network for somatoform disorders (Sofu-Net) was implemented in primary care. AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a stepped, collaborative and coordinated health care network for somatoform and functional disorders (Sofu-Net) compared with regular primary care physician (PCP) practices in German primary care from a societal perspective. METHODS: This study was part of a 6-month controlled, prospective, non-randomized, observer-blinded cluster cohort trial. Participants were recruited from 33 PCP practices in Hamburg, Germany. The health care network was a collaboration of PCPs, psychotherapists, inpatient clinics and a specialized outpatient clinic. Participants in the control group received usual care. A cost-effectiveness analysis, using treatment response as measure of effectiveness, was performed. Uncertainty in cost-effectiveness was analyzed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: In total, n=218 patients (n=119 patients in the intervention group and n=99 patients in the control group) were included in the study. At 6 months, patients within the Sofu-Net group did not differ significantly from the control group with regard to costs (533; standard error 941) and treatment response (--10.3%). For Sofu-Net, the probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 10,000 per additional response to treatment was only 31%. DISCUSSION: Sofu-Net is unlikely to be cost-effective. Even for high WTP, the probability of cost-effectiveness was low. The results were robust to variation of costs included in the analysis as well as when only complete cases were included in the analysis. The most important limitations of the study were that randomization could not be established at patient level and at practice level and that the study design did not allow measurement of costs at baseline. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe somatic symptoms did not benefit from the health care network. Sofu-Net might have reduced costs in patients with moderate somatic symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Owing to the limitations and due to a short follow-up of this study, further cost-effectiveness analyses with high methodological quality and a follow-up of at least one year are needed in order to produce results that are more reliable.


Subject(s)
Community Networks/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Health Questionnaire , Primary Health Care/economics , Prospective Studies , Quality Improvement/economics , Single-Blind Method , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis
6.
Psychosom Med ; 79(3): 345-357, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27768649

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The upcoming International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision for primary care use suggests inclusion of a new diagnostic construct, bodily (di)stress syndrome (BDS), for individuals with medically unexplained symptoms. We aimed to explore the long-term outcome of BDS in health care costs, work disability, and self-rated health. METHODS: Consecutive patients consulting their family physician for a new health problem were screened for physical and mental symptoms by questionnaires (n = 1785). A stratified subsample was examined with a standardized diagnostic interview (n = 701). Patients with single-organ BDS (n = 124) and multiorgan BDS (n = 35), and a reference group with a family physician-verified medical condition (n = 880) were included. All included patients completed a questionnaire at 3, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. Register data on health care costs and work disability were obtained after 2 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with BDS displayed poorer self-rated health and higher illness worry at index consultation and throughout follow-up than the reference group (p ≤ .001). The annual health care costs were higher in the BDS groups (2270 USD and 4066 USD) than in the reference group (1392 USD) (achieved significance level (ASL) ≤ 0.001). Both BDS groups had higher risk of sick leave during the first 2 years of follow-up (RRsingle-organ BDS = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-5.0; RRmultiorgan BDS = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.5-7.5) and substantially higher risk of newly awarded disability pension than the reference group (HRsingle-organ BDS = 4.9; 95% CI = 2.8-8.4; HRmultiorgan BDS = 8.7; 95% CI = 3.7-20.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BDS have poor long-term outcome of health care costs, work disability, and subjective suffering. These findings stress the need for adequate recognition and management of BDS.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pensions/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Somatoform Disorders , Adult , Denmark , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Young Adult
7.
Epilepsy Behav ; 60: 107-111, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27206227

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The long-term outcome of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is of importance given the disabling symptoms and tendency to affect patients early in their productive years. Health care utilization (HCU) is an important outcome measure reflecting overall health status and costs. There is little information regarding long-term HCU following diagnosis of PNES. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of Veterans diagnosed with PNES during epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) evaluation. For the three-year period following diagnosis of PNES, we reviewed emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, and radiology procedures. We compared the three years following PNES diagnosis with the three years preceding diagnosis. We also compared patients with PNES and patients with epileptic seizures (ES). RESULTS: Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were more frequent in patients with PNES compared with those in patients with ES (p=0.01). There was no overall improvement in HCU during the three-year interval following diagnosis of PNES. A transient decrease during the year following diagnosis was not sustained over three-year follow-up. Pain complaints rather than seizures were the most common reason for presentation, whereas the opposite was true for patients with ES (p<0.01). There was a sharp decrease in neurology outpatient visits (p<0.001) and a decrease in primary care visits (p<0.05) after PNES was diagnosed. Total outpatient visits were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Overall HCU did not improve during the three years following diagnosis of PNES, compared with three years preceding diagnosis. The results add to studies documenting poor seizure outcomes following diagnosis of PNES and underscore the need for more effective and comprehensive treatments, addressing comorbid symptoms.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Seizures/economics , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Adult , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/diagnostic imaging , Somatoform Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Veterans
8.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol ; 66(9-10): 356-360, 2016 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27723925

ABSTRACT

Clinical diagnostics of mental disorders especially among refugees and asylum seekers come with unique difficulties: language barriers, different forms of expression and concepts of the understanding of mental illness as well as a different cultural background. Therefore professional interpreters are needed but associated with a higher effort related to costs and time. We conducted a retrospective analysis of costs, which incurred by the use of professional interpreters in our outpatient clinic in Berlin, Germany, in the first quarter 2016 for the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. The sample consisted of 110 refugees and asylum seekers; the highest costs in the use of interpreters incurred among Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (53.04%), especially Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (39.04%), as well as affective disorders (38.47%), especially major depressive episodes (25.23%). Our data point out the crucial need of a regulation of costs with regard to the service of professional interpreters in Germany.


Subject(s)
Culturally Competent Care/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/therapy , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/economics , Refugees/psychology , Translating , Berlin , Communication Barriers , Costs and Cost Analysis , Ethnopsychology/economics , Hospitals, Psychiatric/economics , Mood Disorders/economics , Mood Disorders/therapy , National Health Programs/economics , Neurotic Disorders/economics , Neurotic Disorders/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/economics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
9.
Psychol Med ; 44(13): 2903-11, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25066790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Somatoform disorders are costly for society in terms of increased healthcare expenditure. Patients' illness perceptions have been found to play a role in somatoform disorders. However, it is unclear whether illness perceptions predict higher health costs in these patients. METHOD: A total of 1785 primary care patients presenting a new health complaint completed a questionnaire on their illness perceptions and emotional distress before the consultation. The physicians completed a questionnaire for each patient on diagnostics after the consultation. In a stratified subsample, physician interviewers established diagnoses of DSM-IV somatization and undifferentiated somatoform disorders (n = 144) using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Healthcare expenditure was obtained from Danish health registers for a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Patients had more negative perceptions of their well-defined physical health problems when they had a co-morbid somatoform disorder. A strong illness identity [ß = 0.120, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.029-0.212, p = 0.012], perceived negative consequences (ß = 0.010, 95% CI 0.001-0.019, p = 0.024), a long timeline perspective (ß = 0.013, 95% CI 0.005-0.021, p = 0.001), low personal control (ß = - 0.009, 95% CI -0.015 to -0.002, p = 0.011) and negative emotional representations (ß = 0.009, 95% CI 0.002-0.017, p = 0.020) predicted healthcare expenditure in somatoform disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that illness perceptions play a role in the perpetuation of symptoms in somatoform disorders and predict higher future healthcare expenditure among a subgroup of these patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
10.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 23(4): e243-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439129

ABSTRACT

Psychogenic pseudostroke (PS) is when symptoms are suggestive of a stroke, but in reality, of psychogenic origin. Most neurologists have encountered a case of such nature. However, specific information regarding its prevalence and management is scarce. This is a discussion of psychogenic PS vis-à-vis the complexities in its diagnosis and management.


Subject(s)
Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Stroke/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
11.
Psychosomatics ; 54(2): 132-41, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23218064

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown a greater use of medical than mental health services in patients with somatoform disorders. However, not many studies are based on structured interviews and include the entire somatoform spectrum of diagnoses. We conducted a register-based case-control study to investigate medical care use prior to and three years after diagnosis in patients with somatoform disorders. METHODS: We included 380 patients with somatoform diagnoses (SCID-NP for DSM-IIIR) in a case-control study and compared them with 174 patients with anxiety disorders and 5540 controls from the background population. Data from the Danish National Registers were used to assess health care use in both primary and secondary care. RESULTS: Somatoform patients incurred 2.11 (2.09-2.12) times the primary care visits of controls. They had 3.12 (3.08-3.16) times as many somatic bed-days than controls and 3.94 (3.91-3.97) as many psychiatric bed-days. Primary care use remained stable 3 years after diagnosis (p = 0.14) and the award of disability pension (p = 0.82). However, the number of somatic admissions decreased from 5.64 to 2.76 (p = 0.0004) 3 years after diagnosis. Somatization had an independent effect on health care use when controlling for psychiatric comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with somatoform disorders make significantly greater use of health care services than do controls and patients with anxiety. Somatoform patients made more use of psychiatric services than expected. The use of somatic health care was independent of psychiatric comorbidity. Primary care use and disability pension award were not influenced by proper diagnosing of somatoform disorders whereas number of somatic admissions were halved.


Subject(s)
Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Linear Models , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/economics , Sex Distribution , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/economics
12.
Psychosomatics ; 54(1): 28-34, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23194931

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) pose a substantial burden to patients and the health care system, due to long diagnostic and treatment delays. METHODS: This study used medical chart notes from 103 patients to shed light on the diagnostic process. Electronic medical records and cost data from a US health system were also used to investigate costs and utilization for the 12-months before and after PNES diagnosis. RESULTS: The results show that accurate diagnosis was typically achieved via the use of multiple medical tests, including vEEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scans, as well as historical diagnostic and clinical information. In the year following PNES diagnosis, a decline in average visits (-1.45) and costs (-$1784) were observed. The largest cost savings were seen in neurology care and inpatient stays. CONCLUSIONS: This study has implications for timely and accurate diagnosis of PNES, which may decrease the overall health care burden for individuals and the health care system.


Subject(s)
Health Services/economics , Seizures/economics , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Adult , Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/psychology , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , United States , Young Adult
13.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 25(1): 52-64, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23383667

ABSTRACT

In medically ill patients the term 'somatic symptoms' is used to understand those symptoms which cannot be fully understood in the light of existing medical illness(es). These include a number of physical symptoms and also certain clinical syndromes such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome among others. However, it is increasingly recognized that such patients have larger degrees of psychological morbidities, especially depressive and anxiety disorders, and have disproportionately elevated rates of medical care utilization, including outpatient visits, hospitalizations and total healthcare costs. In view of this psychological morbidity, significant distress and functional impairment, the role of the consultation-liaison psychiatrist is prominent in the management of these patients. A consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatrist is expected to be part of the primary care team to manage patient with unexplained SS, and at the same time is expected to guide colleagues to practice a patient-centred approach to improve the outcome of patients with such symptoms. The clinical work of a CL psychiatrist involves evaluation of patients with medically unexplained symptoms for probable psychiatric disorders and treatment of psychiatric morbidity and also management of patients without psychiatric morbidity. Management strategies include reattribution, cognitive behaviour therapy and antidepressants, with each strategy showing varying degrees of success.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Cost of Illness , Pain , Psychiatric Somatic Therapies , Psychiatry/methods , Somatoform Disorders , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Health Services Misuse/prevention & control , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Models, Psychological , Pain/complications , Pain/psychology , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Professional Role , Psychiatric Somatic Therapies/methods , Psychiatric Somatic Therapies/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/etiology , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Symptom Assessment/methods
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 520, 2013 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24344899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine whether healthcare resources are allocated fairly, it is helpful to have information on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with Unexplained Physical Symptoms (UPS) and on the costs associated with them, and on how these relate to corresponding data in other patient groups. As studies to date have been limited to specific patient populations with UPS, the objective of this study was to assess QoL and costs in a general sample of patients with UPS using generic measures. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 162 patients with UPS reported on their QoL, use of healthcare resources and lost productivity in paid and unpaid work. To assess QoL, the generic SF-36 questionnaire was used, from which multidimensional quality-of-life scores and a one-dimensional score (utility) using the SF-6D scorings algorithm were derived. To assess costs, the TiC-P questionnaire was used. RESULTS: Patients with UPS reported a poor QoL. Their QoL was mostly decreased by limitations in functioning due to physical health, and the least by limitations in functioning due to emotional problems. The median of utilities was 0.57, and the mean was 0.58 (SD = .09).The cost for the use of healthcare services was estimated to be €3,123 (SD = €2,952) per patient per year. This cost was enlarged by work-related costs: absence from work (absenteeism), lower on-the-job productivity (presenteeism), and paid substitution of domestic tasks. The resulting mean total cost was estimated to be €6,815 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients with UPS have a high burden of disease and use a considerable amount of healthcare resources. In comparison with other patient groups, the QoL values of patients with UPS were among the poorest and their costs were among the highest of all patient groups. The burden for both patients and society helps to justify the allocation of sufficient resources to effective treatment for patients with UPS.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Absenteeism , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Schmerz ; 27(4): 380-6, 2013 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23860633

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Data on administrative prevalence, types of treatment and disease costs of patients diagnosed with somatoform pain disorder (according to ICD 10) in Germany were not previously available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed health insurance data from 2008-2010 of 8.5 million people of the German statutory health insurance company BARMER GEK on administrative prevalence of insurants with at least one billing code F 45.4x in 2009 and at least one second billing code F 45.4x in the time period 2008-2010 stratified by age and gender, different professions being involved in treatment, diagnostics and treatment methods applied. The types and costs of out-patient treatment and of in-patient treatment in case of any discharge with diagnosis of F45.4 were analysed. RESULTS: The administrative prevalence doubled from 2008 to 2010 after the separation of the previous code F45.4 into F45.40 and F45.41. In 2009, 0.5 % of the insurants were diagnosed with F 45.4, whereby F 45.4 was diagnosed 2.3-fold more often in women than in men. Family practitioners (41 %) and anaesthesiologists (28 %) were the leading specialties in the care of chronic patients. In 2009, 54 % of patients underwent x-ray examination, 25 % magnetic resonance imaging and 11 % computed tomography. In all, 66 % of the chronic patients received basic psychosomatic care, 38 % were prescribed opioids, 12 % underwent spinal nerve anaesthesia and 14 % received psychotherapy. In 2009, the average direct and indirect treatment costs per patient with somatoform pain disorder were 5500 . CONCLUSION: Insurants diagnosed with somatoform pain disorder were probably overtreated with radiology and invasive procedures and with opioids.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/economics , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Claim Review/organization & administration , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Pain Management/economics , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/therapy , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Infant , Insurance Claim Review/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/psychology , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Care Team/economics , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
16.
Psychother Psychosom ; 81(5): 265-75, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22832397

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review cost-of-illness studies (COI) and economic evaluations (EE) conducted for medically unexplained symptoms and to analyze their methods and results. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed, PsycINFO and National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database of the University of York. Cost data were inflated to 2006 using country-specific gross domestic product inflators and converted to 2006 USD purchasing power parities. RESULTS: We identified 5 COI and 8 EE, of which 6 were cost-minimization analyses and 2 were cost-effectiveness analyses. All studies used patient level data collected between 1980 and 2004 and were predominantly conducted in the USA (n = 10). COI found annual excess health care costs of somatizing patients between 432 and 5,353 USD in 2006 values. Indirect costs were estimated by only one EE and added up to about 18,000 USD per year. In EE, educational interventions for physicians as well as cognitive-behavioral therapy approaches for patients were evaluated. For both types of interventions, effectiveness was either shown within EE or by previous studies. Most EE found (often insignificant) cost reductions resulting from the interventions, but only two studies explicitly combined changes in costs with data on effectiveness to cost-effectiveness ratios (ratio of additional costs to additional effects). CONCLUSIONS: Medically unexplained symptoms cause relevant annual excess costs in health care that are comparable to mental health problems like depression or anxiety disorders and which may be reduced by interventions targeting physicians as well as patients. More extensive research on indirect costs and cost-effectiveness is needed.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Research Design , Somatoform Disorders/therapy
17.
BMC Geriatr ; 12: 27, 2012 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22682023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known of the importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the associations of social support, somatic health problems and socio-economic factors with psychological distress. We also examined changes in the association of somatic health problems and socio-economic factors with psychological distress after adjusting for social support. METHODS: A random sample of 4,000 persons aged 65 years or more living at home in Oslo was drawn. Questionnaires were sent by post, and the total response was 2,387 (64%). Psychological distress was assessed using Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-10) and social support with the Oslo-3 Social Support Scale (OSS-3). A principal component analysis (PCA) included all items of social support and psychological distress. Partial correlations were used, while associations were studied by logistic regression. RESULTS: After adjusting for socio-demographics and somatic health problems, we reported a statistically significant association between psychological distress and social support: "Number of close friends", OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.80; "Concern and interest", OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.55-0.84. A strong association between lack of social support and psychological distress, irrespective of variables adjusted for, indicated a direct effect. The associations between psychological distress and physical impairments were somewhat reduced when adjusted for social support, particularly for hearing, whereas the associations between somatic diagnoses and psychological distress were more or less eliminated. Income was found to be an independent determinant for psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of social support and somatic health problems were associated with psychological distress in elders. Social support acted as a mediator, implying that the negative effect of somatic health problems, especially hearing, on psychological distress was mediated by low social support. We hypothesize that physical impairments reduced social support, thereby increasing psychological distress to a greater extent than the selected diagnoses. The combination of poor social support, poor somatic health and economic problems may represent a vulnerable situation with respect to the mental health of older persons. Free interventions that highlight social support should be considered in mental health promotion.


Subject(s)
Residence Characteristics , Social Support , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Stress, Psychological/economics , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Social Environment , Socioeconomic Factors , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 47(2): 323-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21170515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frequent attendance to primary care services has shown an association with psychosocial factors in adult and child populations. Little is known about the psychosocial correlates of attendance in adolescents. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To study the contribution of psychosocial factors to frequent primary care attendance in a community sample of young British people. METHOD: The method used was a cross-sectional survey of 1,251 secondary school pupils, using self-report questionnaires for socio-demographic, physical and psychological health data. RESULTS: A total of 1,116 pupils [mean age 13.51 years (SD 1.5), 52% female] completed questionnaires and provided information about contact with their general practitioner (GP) in the previous year; 30% were frequent attenders (≥4 appointments). Frequent attenders were significantly younger; they were more likely to come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, report significantly more past and current physical problems, have more hospital visits in the previous year, have more recent intense somatic symptoms made worse by stress and causing impairment, and have more days off school. Frequent attendance was also significantly associated with the presence of emotional symptoms and a history of mental health consultations. Logistic regression analysis identified seeing a hospital doctor, current illness, having days off school, a history of mental health consultations and younger age as independent predictors of frequent attendance. CONCLUSION: In addition to physical health problems, social factors and psychiatric difficulty are linked to and require attention in young people who are frequent attenders at primary care health services.


Subject(s)
Health Services Misuse/trends , Mental Health Services/trends , Primary Health Care/trends , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Depression/economics , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Health Services Misuse/economics , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (12): CD006524, 2010 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21154369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In primary care between 10% and 35% of all visits concern patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). MUPS are associated with high medical consumption, significant disabilities and psychiatric morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of consultation letters (CLs) to assist primary care physicians or occupational health physicians in the treatment of patients with MUPS and diagnostic subgroups. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group Controlled Trials Registers, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE  (1966-2009), MEDLINE In Process (2009-08-17), EMBASE (1974-2009), PSYCINFO (1980-2009) and CINAHL (1982-2009). We screened the references lists of selected studies and consulted experts in the field to identify any additional, eligible RCTs. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of CLs for patients with MUPS being treated in primary care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened the abstracts of the studies identified through the searches and independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We resolved any disagreement by discussion with a third review author. We assessed heterogeneity and, where a number of studies reported the same outcomes, pooled results in a meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We included six RCTs, with a total of 449 patients. In four studies (267 patients) the CL intervention resulted in reduced medical costs (in two studies the outcomes could be pooled: MD -352.55 US Dollars (95% CI -522.32 to -182.78)) and improved physical functioning (three studies, MD 5.71 (95% CI 4.11 to 7.31)). In two studies (182 patients) the intervention was a joint consultation with a psychiatrist in presence of the physician, and resulted in reduced severity of somatization symptoms, reduced medical consumption and improved social functioning. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence that a CL is effective in terms of medical costs and improvement of physical functioning for patients with MUPS in primary care. The results are even less pronounced in patients with clinically less severe, but more meaningful, forms of MUPS and the results vary for other patient-related outcomes. All studies, except one, were performed in the United States and therefore the results can not be generalized directly to countries with other healthcare systems. Furthermore all studies were small and of only moderate quality. There is very limited evidence that a joint consultation with the patient by a psychiatrist in the presence of the physician, together with the provision of a CL, reduces severity of somatization symptoms and medical consumption.


Subject(s)
Interview, Psychological , Medical Records , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Case Management/organization & administration , Cross-Over Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient-Centered Care , Primary Health Care , Psychiatry , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/psychology
20.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 78(4): 213-8, 2010 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20178066

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The necessity to establish disability and invalidity pensions due to psychiatric diseases has become more and more demanding in recent years. So far there is little knowledge about the aetiology and socio-demographic aspects of this phenomenon. METHODS: The presented explorative analyses included 94 examinations (43 women, 51 men) to address, if a person should be medically certified as partly or permanently unfit for work. The data, including psychiatric diagnosis and socio-demographic data were obtained between 1999 and 2006 in a German specialised psychiatric university unit. RESULTS: The diagnoses of neurotic diseases, stress related and somatoform disorders (ICD-10 F 40 - 48) were the most prevalent group (48 %) within the sample. It was a statistically significant predictive factor in a later declaration of disability and invalidity. In this diagnosis group (F 40 - 48) more participants were female when compared to other diagnosis groups. In general, participants were more likely to be divorced and have a lower education level when compared to the general population. However, the mean level of intelligence was similar to the general population. CONCLUSION: The results of the presented study could be beneficial for a better understanding of the association between disability pensions and psychiatric diseases. The increase of neurotic diseases, stress related and somatoform disorders may justify the development of targeted prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Insurance, Disability/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/psychology , Pensions/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Intelligence Tests , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Neurotic Disorders/economics , Neurotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Socioeconomic Factors , Somatoform Disorders/economics , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL