Characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis: L5 versus non-L5.

BACKGROUND: Fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) spondylolysis has a lower bone union rate than non-L5 spondylolysis, but the reason for this is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in patient and lesion characteristics between L5 and non-L5 spondylolysis. METHODS: A total of 410 patients with lumbar spondylolysis aged 18 years or younger who were treated conservatively were enrolled. Patients and lesions were divided into L5 and non-L5 (L2-L4) spondylolysis. Factors, including sex, age, presence of spina bifida occulta, stage of the main side lesion, whether the lesion was unilateral or bilateral, presence and stage of the contralateral side lesion and treatment duration, were evaluated at the first visit and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients with 349 lesions were included. The bone union rate of L5 lesions was lower than that of non-L5 lesions (75% vs. 86%, p = 0.015). Patients with L5 spondylolysis were more likely to be male (86% vs. 66%) and younger (14.0 vs. 14.6 years) than patients with non-L5 spondylolysis. Lesions of L5 spondylolysis were more likely to be in a progressive stage (28% vs. 15%), less likely to be in a pre-lysis stage (28% vs. 43%) and more likely to be in a contralateral terminal stage (14% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.013) compared with lesions of non-L5 spondylolysis. CONCLUSIONS: L5 spondylolysis was characterised by a lower bone union rate, more males, younger age, more progressive stage and more contralateral pseudarthrosis than non-L5 spondylolysis.

Factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with pedicle screw and lamina hook: a clinical and CT-assessed study.

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw and lamina hook (PSLH) technique is an effective and popular method for direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis. There is a lack of studies to explore factors that may influence the healing of spondylolysis after direct pars repair surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PSLH technique. METHODS: A total of 55 subjects (average age 21.1 ± 6.3 years, a total of 120 pars defects) diagnosed with symptomatic spondylolysis and underwent pars repair surgery with PSLH were followed up and their clinical data were analyzed. Subjects were divided into a non-fusion group and fusion group according to whether the pars defect had bony fusion at last follow-up assessed by CT. Radiographic data, data related to spondylolysis and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time of the 55 patients was 24.8 ± 12.0 (12-64) months. Among the 120 pars defects, 101 defects were successfully fused and 19 were not fused according to CT. The fusion rate was 84.2%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the factors correlated with non-fusion after pars repair surgery: whether the spondylolysis segment was associated with spina bifida occulta (SBO) (P = 0.001), stage of the defect (P = 0.047), width of the defect (P = 0.002), and disc degeneration (P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Direct pars repair by PSHL is a reliable treatment for lumbar spondylolysis with a fusion rate of 84.2%. Association with SBO of the spondylolysis segment, a terminal stage of the defect, a wider defect gap, and grade III disc degeneration may be factors associated with non-fusion after direct pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis with PLSH. Non-fusion patients after pars repair appear to have worse clinical results compared to fusion patients.

Biportal endoscopic bone graft repair and percutaneous screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis-technical note and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spondylolysis involves a bony defect in the vertebral pars interarticularis, predominantly affecting the lower lumbar spine. This condition is a significant etiological factor in lumbar instability and recurrent lower back pain, particularly in young individuals. While conservative treatments are the primary intervention, they often fail to provide relief, necessitating surgical approaches. Notwithstanding, executing bone grafting and fixation in the pars interarticularis defect simultaneously through minimally invasive surgery remains challenging. METHOD: This study elucidates the biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) technique, innovatively applied for bone graft repair and percutaneous cannulated screw fixation in a patient with lumbar spondylolysis. We offer a detailed walkthrough of the technical procedures supplemented with follow-up radiographic evidence. RESULTS: The BESS technique facilitated meticulous clearance of the defect site, coupled with bone grafting and cannulated screw fixation, effectively addressing lumbar spondylolysis through a minimally invasive approach. This method holds promise for achieving substantial osseous fusion at the vertebral pars interarticularis defect site. CONCLUSION: The BESS procedure for lumbar spondylolysis ensures a clean and prepared defect site for grafting and encourages successful osseous fusion, spotlighting its potential as a viable surgical strategy in managing this condition.

L5 spondylolysis: Anatomical study comparing healed and unhealed lesions.

The anatomy and pathogenesis of spondylolysis has been widely studied; however, the microanatomy of spondylolysis of the lumbar vertebra has not been well described. Therefore, we aim to better elucidate this anatomy. Twenty dry bone specimens of healed and unhealed spondylolysis of the L5 vertebra were collected from human skeletal remains. Twelve L5 vertebrae were examples of unhealed spondylolysis and eight specimens exhibited a healed (i.e., bony fusion of the lesion) spondylolysis lesion. The specimens underwent macro and microanatomical analysis followed by CT and microCT imaging. Finally, selected healed and unhealed lesions were submitted for histological analysis using Mason Trichrome staining. The pars interarticularis of two L5 vertebrae without signs of healed/unhealed spondylolysis were evaluated histologically as controls. Of the 12 unhealed L5 pars defects, three were unilateral on left side. Of the eight healed pars defects, all were unilateral and seven of these were on left sides. One unilateral pars defect also had spina bifida occulta. Both on imaging and histological analysis, healed pars defects were only so superficially and not at deeper levels. Histologically, unhealed edges were made up of dense cortical bone while healed edges were made up primarily of trabecular bone. Based on our anatomical findings, the so-called healed spondylolysis lesions, although externally fused, are not thoroughly fused internally. Moreover, the anterior and posterior edges of the unhealed spondylosysis lesions are irregular and show signs of long-term disarticulation. Taken together, these data suggest that such 'healed' lesions might not be as stable as the normal L5 pars interarticularis.

Bilateral spondylolysis of inferior articular processes of lumbar vertebra with no active sports history: Case report and review of literature.

Lumbar spondylosis, though mostly occurs at pars interarticularis of vertebrae, it rarely occurs at articular processes. Like the ones in pars interarticularis, articular process fractures are stress fractures that are usually seen in people participated in active sprts activity. Most of the time, nonoperative treatment is adequate. When conservative treatment fails, removal of fragments accomplishes pain relief. In this report, we present a case with bilateral spondylolysis of inferior articular processes at 3rd lumbar vertebrae and discuss with regards to the literature.

Deep-Learning-Aided Evaluation of Spondylolysis Imaged with Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Isthmic spondylolysis results in fracture of pars interarticularis of the lumbar spine, found in as many as half of adolescent athletes with persistent low back pain. While computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of spondylolysis, the use of ionizing radiation near reproductive organs in young subjects is undesirable. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferable, it has lowered sensitivity for detecting the condition. Recently, it has been shown that ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI can provide markedly improved bone contrast compared to conventional MRI. To take UTE MRI further, we developed supervised deep learning tools to generate (1) CT-like images and (2) saliency maps of fracture probability from UTE MRI, using ex vivo preparation of cadaveric spines. We further compared quantitative metrics of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM) between UTE MRI (inverted to make the appearance similar to CT) and CT and between CT-like images and CT. Qualitative results demonstrated the feasibility of successfully generating CT-like images from UTE MRI to provide easier interpretability for bone fractures thanks to improved image contrast and CNR. Quantitatively, the mean CNR of bone against defect-filled tissue was 35, 97, and 146 for UTE MRI, CT-like, and CT images, respectively, being significantly higher for CT-like than UTE MRI images. For the image similarity metrics using the CT image as the reference, CT-like images provided a significantly lower mean MSE (0.038 vs. 0.0528), higher mean PSNR (28.6 vs. 16.5), and higher SSIM (0.73 vs. 0.68) compared to UTE MRI images. Additionally, the saliency maps enabled quick detection of the location with probable pars fracture by providing visual cues to the reader. This proof-of-concept study is limited to the data from ex vivo samples, and additional work in human subjects with spondylolysis would be necessary to refine the models for clinical use. Nonetheless, this study shows that the utilization of UTE MRI and deep learning tools could be highly useful for the evaluation of isthmic spondylolysis.

Utility of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the utility of the Doppler effect on ultrasonography for the diagnosis of very early- and early-stage lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent patients. METHODS: In total, 76 adolescent patients with acute and subacute low back pain were prospectively enrolled, with 46 having lumbar spondylolysis and the remaining 30 having low back pain without spondylolysis. MRI and/or computed tomograms scans revealed very early- and early-stage lumbar spondylolysis. Furthermore, positive Doppler findings in ultrasonography around the area from the facet joint to the laminae were investigated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age (p > 0.99) and body mass index (p = 0.11) between cases with and without spondylolysis. Very early- and early-stage spondylolysis were observed in 27.6% and 72.4% of patients, respectively. Positive power Doppler was 91.3% and 33.3% in cases with and without spondylolysis, respectively, which was significantly higher in spondylolysis (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of this positive power Doppler were 91.4% and 66.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the rate of positive power Doppler was significantly higher in early-stage spondylolysis (p = 0.02), with 75.0% and 97.6% sensitivity in very early- and early-stage spondylolysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive Doppler effect on ultrasonography is effective for screening very early- and early-stage spondylolysis in adolescent patients in an outpatient clinic.

Association of spinal anomalies with spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of spinal anomalies with lumbar spondylolysis and spina bifida occulta (SBO). METHODS: A total of 1190 patients with thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography scans available were categorized according to the number of presacral (thoracic and lumbar) mobile vertebrae and the presence or absence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). The prevalence of spondylolysis and SBO and the association of spinal anomalies with these disorders were evaluated. RESULTS: Normal morphology (17 mobile vertebra with no LSTV) was found in 607 men (86.5%) and 419 women (85.9%) and about 14% of patients had anomalies. Spondylolysis was found in 74 patients (6.2%), comprising 54 men (7.7%) and 20 women (4.1%). SBO involving the lumbar spine was found in 9 men (1.3%) and 2 women (0.4%). Spondylolysis was significantly more common in men with 18 vertebrae without LSTV (21.1%) than in those with 17 vertebrae without LSTV (7.2%) (p = 0.002). The prevalence of spinal anomalies was 55.6% in men and 50.0% in women with SBO that included a lumbar level was significantly higher than in both men (13.5%, p < 0.001) and women (4.8%, p = 0.003) without SBO. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that there is a relationship between spinal anomalies and both spondylolysis and SBO, which may lead to elucidation of the mechanism of onset of spondylolysis and improve its treatment and prognosis. Awareness that patients with SBO involving the lumbar spine have an increased likelihood of a spinal anomaly may help to prevent level errors during spinal surgery.

Conservative treatment of spondylolysis involving exercise initiated early and sports activities resumed with a lumbar-sacral brace.

BACKGROUND: Conservative treatment including the use of a brace and cessation of sports activities is known to be effective in spondylolysis. However, there is some controversy regarding [1] the type of brace, and [2] the endpoint for bracing, and [3] the timing of resumption of sports activities. The aim of the current study was to investigate the appropriateness of early exercise and resumption of sports activities with a lumbar-sacral brace in very early- and early-stage lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 45 patients with very early- and early-stage lumbar spondylolysis. A lumbar-sacral brace, structured to be a hard brace in the back and a mesh brace in the front, was used. Isometric exercises/stretching was started immediately after the initial visit. The number of patients for whom bone fusion was fully achieved on CT and the disappearance of signal intensity change on MRI were investigated. RESULTS: In 12 cases of very early-stage spondylolysis, the average elapsed time until signal intensity disappearance as confirmed on MRI was 4.3 ± 1.6 months. Bony union on CT was confirmed in all cases. In 33 cases of early spondylolysis, signal intensity change disappeared on MRI within 5.2 ± 2.4 months. The rate of bony union was 94.3%, and the average period required to achieve bony union observable on CT was 3.7 ± 1.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient bony union can be achieved by conservative treatment with early exercise and a lumbar-sacral brace in cases of very early and early spondylolysis.

Union evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis using MRI and CT in adolescents treated conservatively.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the union rate of acute lumbar spondylolysis in patients treated conservatively, according to the protocol. METHODS: The subjects included high school students and younger patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylolysis presenting bone marrow edema. We investigated the union rate, the period until union, unilateral or bilateral, vertebral level, laterality (right or left), and pathological stage at the first visit. Some unilateral cases included bilateral spondylolysis with contralateral pseudarthrotic lesion; therefore, the union rate of the "true" unilateral case in which the contralateral side was normal was calculated. We excluded multi-level lesions. RESULTS: With conservative treatment for lumbar spondylolysis of 189 lesions in 142 cases, 144 healed and 45 were considered as nonunion. The average treatment period until union was 106 days. The union of "true" unilateral cases in which the contralateral side was normal was noted in 68/71 lesions, but that of bilateral cases was noted in 71/94 lesions. The union in L3, L4, and L5 vertebrae was noted in 15/17, 40/49, and 89/123 lesions, respectively. The union was observed in 63/87 on the right and 86/102 on the left. The union was noted in the pre-lysis, early, and progressive stages in 36/39, 81/97, and 27/53 lesions, respectively. Furthermore, the union was noted in stages 0, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 2 in 13/15, 47/52, 30/36, 34/42, and 20/44 lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Accurate union evaluation using CT and MRI showed a union rate of 76% with conservative treatment for spondylolysis. The union rate of the "true" unilateral cases in which the contralateral side was normal was 96%, which was significantly higher than that of the bilateral cases. Moreover, the union rate of lesions in the axial progressive stage and sagittal stage 2 was significantly lower than that of lesions in other stages. STUDY DESIGN: clinical retrospective study.

Comparison of L5 pedicle morphology in patients with and without L5 spondylolysis.

Only a small number of studies have reported on L5 pedicle morphology in the presence of spondylolisthesis let alone isolated spondylolysis and findings are therefore variable. The aim of this radiographic study was to analyze L5 pedicle morphology in the presence and absence of L5 spondylolysis. The was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of computed tomographic (CT) imaging. Assessment of the L5 pedicle morphology (height, width, length, transverse angle and screw length) were measured in patients with and without L5 spondylolysis. Pelvic measures including pelvic incidence, sacral anatomic orientation and sacral table angle were recorded. Patients were matched for age and gender. Twenty-three patients with spondylolysis were matched to 46 patients without. The presence of spondylolysis alone did not have a significant influence on either pelvic or pedicle morphologic parameters. Only with the presence of associated spondylolisthesis was there a difference noted with an increase in pedicle length observed. Correlation analysis suggested further morphologic changes may result with increased remodeling. Isolated spondylolysis at L5 appears to have little influence on pedicle morphology in this CT-based analysis. Morphologic changes appear likely to become significant only with associated spondylolisthesis and associated remodeling.

Role of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on lumbar spondylolysis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the role of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PEDro and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and 2020 by using medical subject headings and applying Booleans, such as low-intensity pulsed ultrasound OR interventional ultrasound AND lumbar spine OR lumbar region AND spondylolysis OR stress fracture. Unpublished studies were hand-searched in the journals, abstracts of conferences were reviewed, and citation index was used for searching experts in the field and then contacting them for information. Studies included were the ones that had at least one of the following outcomes: bone union rate, treatment period to bone union and time to return to previous activities. RESULTS: Of the 243 studies identified, 228(94%) were full text articles and only 2(0.8%) studies were critically appraised for qualitative synthesis based on bone union rate, treatment period to bone union, and time to return to previous activities. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound was found to be effective for bone union and a useful therapy for quick return to playing sports in patients with lumbar spondylolysis.

What is the difference in pedicle morphology of the fifth lumbar vertebra between isthmic and degenerative L5-S1 spondylolisthesis? An anatomic study of 328 patients via multi-slice spiral computed tomography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate and determine whether there are differences in L5 pedicles morphology between isthmic and degenerative L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and 45 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 were enrolled in the IS group and DS group, respectively, and 164 lumbar disc herniation patients without spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis were classified into the normal (NL) group. A series of pedicle parameters of the fifth lumbar vertebra, including pedicle length (PL), pedicle width (PW), pedicle screw trajectory length (PSTL), pedicle height (PH), and the pedicle camber angle (PCA), were measured using multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). The slip distance of the L5 vertebra was measured on radiography, and the percentage of slip was also recorded. RESULTS: The pedicles of the fifth lumbar vertebra were shorter and wider, and the PCA was larger in the IS group compared to the DS group and NL group. On the contrary, the pedicles in the DS group were elongated and thinner, and the PCA was smaller. The pedicle parameters of PL were significantly positively correlated with the percentage of slip in the DS group, but PW and PCA were negatively correlated with the percentage of slip. There was no correlation between the percentage of slip and L5 pedicle parameters in the IS group. CONCLUSIONS: The L5 pedicles morphology in L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis shows abduction, shortness, and width, while that in the degenerative spondylolisthesis shows adduction, lengthening, and thinning compared with the normal populations. The morphology changes may be the result of pedicle stress remodelling in the development of spondylolisthesis, which should be taken into consideration when placing at the insertion of pedicle screws.

Factors associated with failure of bony union after conservative treatment of acute cases of unilateral lumbar spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND: If bone union is expected, conservative treatment is generally selected for lumbar spondylolysis. However, sometimes conservative treatments are unsuccessful. We sought to determine the factors associated with failure of bony union in acute unilateral lumbar spondylolysis with bone marrow edema including contralateral pseudarthrosis. METHODS: This study targeted unilateral lumbar spondylolysis treated conservatively in high school or younger students. Conservative therapy was continued until the bone marrow edema disappeared on MRI and bone union was investigated by CT. We conducted a univariate analysis of sex, age, pathological stage, lesion level complicating the contralateral bone defect, lesion level, and intercurrent spina bifida occulta, and variables with p < 0.1 were considered in a logistic regression analysis. An item with p < 0.05 was defined as a factor associated with failure of bony union. RESULTS: We found 92 cases of unilateral spondylolysis with bone marrow edema and 66 cases were successfully treated conservatively. Failure of bony union in unilateral lumbar spondylolysis with bone marrow edema was associated with progressive pathological stage (p = 0.004), contralateral pseudarthrosis (p < 0.001), and L5 lesion level (p = 0.002). The odds ratio was 20.0 (95% CI 3.0-193.9) for progressive pathological stage, 78.8 (95% CI 13-846) for contralateral pseudarthrosis, and 175 (95% CI 8.5-8192) for L5 lesion level. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative therapy aiming at bony union is contraindicated in cases of acute unilateral spondylolysis when the pathological stage is progressive, the lesion level is L5, or there is contralateral pseudarthrotic spondylolysis.

Assessment of sagittal spinopelvic parameters in a Taiwanese population with spondylolysis by the EOS imaging system: a retrospective radiological analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on spondylolysis is well established in Caucasian populations. However, prior studies suggest that people from different ethnological backgrounds showed divergence, and a few studies that focused on Asian populations reported conflicting results. The aim of this study is to use the EOS imaging system to evaluate the spinopelvic parameters of spondylolysis patients, and their relationship with spondylolisthesis, disc degeneration, and age in a Taiwanese population. METHODS: Radiographic sagittal spinopelvic parameters for 45 spondylolysis patients and 32 healthy people were evaluated, including pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL). The spinopelvic parameters were compared between spondylolytic and control groups. These parameters were further compared between spondylolytic subjects with and without spondylolisthesis, with and without high-grade disc degeneration, and young (< 30 years old) and middle-aged. RESULTS: The PI and LL of the spondylolytic group (52.6°±12.0° and 41.3°±15.2°) were significantly higher than those of the healthy control group (47.16°±7.95° and 28.22°±10.65°). Further analysis of the spondylolytic patients revealed that those with high-grade disc degeneration were more prone to spondylolisthesis (92.3 %) compared to those without (50 %; p = 0.001). The middle-aged group had significantly higher rates of spondylolisthesis (80 %) and high-grade disc degeneration (52.4 %) compared with those for the young group (45 and 16.7 %, respectively; p = 0.017 and 0.047, respectively). No statistically significant difference in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters was found when spondylolytic patients were divided according to the occurrence of spondylolisthesis or high-grade disc degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: In a Taiwanese population, PI and LL were significantly larger in spondylolytic patients. Disc degeneration and age were associated with the occurrence of spondylolisthesis. Ethnological differences should thus be taken into account when making clinical decisions regarding spondylolysis in a Taiwanese population.

Increased sagittal diameter of the vertebral arch aids in diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a diagnostic indicator of lumbar spondylolysis visible in plain X-ray films. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-two patients with low back pain who received X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) examinations were identified and studied. They were divided into three groups: the spondylosis without spondylolisthesis (SWS) group, comprising 67 patients with bilateral pars interarticularis defects at L5 and without spondylolisthesis, the isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) group, comprising 74 patients with L5/S1 spondylolisthesis and bilateral L5 pars interarticularis defects, and the control group, comprising 31 patients with low back pain but without spondylolysis. The sagittal diameters of the vertebral arch (SDVAs) of L4 and L5 were measured in lateral X-ray image, and the differences in SDVA between L4 and L5 (DSL4-5) in each case were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics among the three groups. In the SWS and IS groups, the SDVA of L5 was significantly longer than the SDVA of L4 (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference found in the control group (p > 0.05). DSL4-5, in which the SDVA of L4 was subtracted from the SDVA of L5, significantly differed among the three groups (p < 0.001), and the normal threshold was provisionally determined to be 1.55 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In bilateral L5 spondylolysis, the SDVA of L5 is wider than the SDVA of L4, and this difference is greater in isthmic spondylolisthesis. This sign in lateral X-rays may provide a simple and convenient aid for the diagnosis of spondylolysis.

Stress Injuries of the Spine in Sports.

Spine sports stress injuries account for a significant amount of time loss at play in athletes, particularly if left unrecognized and allowed to progress. Spondylolysis makes up most of these stress injuries. This article focuses on spondylolysis, bringing together discussion from the literature on its pathomechanics and the different imaging modalities used in its diagnosis. Radiologists should be aware of the limitations and more importantly the roles of different imaging modalities in guiding and dictating the management of spondylolysis. Other stress-related injuries in the spine are also discussed including but not limited to pedicle fracture and apophyseal ring injury.

Characteristics and diagnostic factors associated with fresh lumbar spondylolysis in elementary school-aged children.

PURPOSE: We often encounter elementary school-aged children with fresh lumbar spondylolysis and non-union of bone. They may have factors that impede healing, and treatment outcomes need improvement. The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary school-aged patients with fresh lumbar spondylolysis and to identify characteristics that can aid in prompt diagnosis and proper therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the characteristics of fresh lumbar spondylolysis in elementary school-aged children with those of older patients. We included patients aged 6-18 years with lower back pain and evidence of bone marrow oedema of lumbar pedicles on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The elementary school-aged group (group E) included 100 patients aged 6-12 years, and the senior group (group S) included 251 patients aged 13-18 years. We recorded patient sex, duration of lower back pain, injured site (lumbar level, unilateral/bilateral), presence of contralateral pars defect with evidence of high signal change on MRI (short tau inversion recovery), presence of spina bifida occulta (SBO), and follow-up treatment interruption rate. RESULTS: One-third of the patients in group E were female, and there was an even smaller proportion of females in group S. L5 lumbar spondylolysis was more common in group E. The treatment interruption rate was lower in group E. L5 SBO and contralateral pars defect were more common in group E. CONCLUSION: L5 lumbar spondylolysis, L5 SBO, and contralateral pars defect were important diagnostic factors in elementary school-aged patients. Identification of these characteristics will aid in prompt diagnosis and proper therapy.

Occupational influences on Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in a cohort of 18-year-old male military conscripts.

BACKGROUND: The reported prevalence of spondylolysis (SL) in the adult population is 6-7%. Data concerning adolescent-onset spondylolisthesis (SLS) and the impact of certain activities on it is scarce. We examined the risk of clinical progression of SL and SLS as a function of primary severity and occupational strain among military recruits. METHODS: Based on the Israel defense Force (IDF) central human resources database, we identified 1521 18-year-old males inducted to the IDF with SL/SLS between the late nineteen nineties and early two-thousands. We followed changes in the SL/SLS status during the 3 years of obligatory military service. Disease severity was classified as Cat2: radiological findings of SL without clinical findings; Cat3: painful SL or asymptomatic grade 1 SLS; Cat4: grade 1 SLS with pain; Cat5: Grade 2 SLS. The soldiers were subdivided into the following occupational categories: administrative, combat, maintenance, and driving. The purpose was to compare the progression rates in different medical categories and job assignments. RESULTS: There were 162 recruits in Cat2, 961 in Cat3, and 398 recruits in Cat4. The overall progression rate to Cat5 (grade 2 SLS) was 1.02%. Significant progression rates were seen amongst administrative soldiers with a relatively higher risk of progression from Cat4 (painful-grade-1 SLS: 2.2%) vs. Cat3 (asymptomatic SLS: 0.5%, relative risk = 4.7, p < 0.02). Other occupational categories did not exhibit significant progression rates. CONCLUSION: Progression of SL/SLS was highest in Cat4, i.e. for recruits already diagnosed with painful SLS (i.e. with a more severe baseline disorder). Progression did not correlate with military occupation. We recommend further follow-up studies that include, aside from progression rates, incidence rates of newly diagnosed grade 2 SL during military service.

Percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect without general anesthesia could be a satisfying treatment alternative for young patient with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis: a technique note with case series.

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical procedures are applied in young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis when conservative treatments fail. Although the optimal surgical procedure option is controversial, the treatment paradigm has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive spine surgery. To date, a limited number of studies on the feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect have been carried out. Herein, for the first time, we retrospectively explore the outcomes of pars defect via percutaneous endoscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively examined young patients with spondylolysis treated using the percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect supplemented with autograft as well as percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between September 2014 and December 2018. Six patients with a mean age of 18.8 years were enrolled in the study. We used preoperatively computed tomographic (CT) scans to evaluate the size of pars defect, and graded disc degeneration using Pfirrmann's classification through magnetic resonance images (MRI). We assessed the clinical outcomes using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as well as Visual Analogue Scale for back pain (VAS-B). RESULTS: Our findings revealed that pain intensity and function outcomes, including VAS-B, ODI, and SF-36 (PCS and MCS) scores, were markedly improved after surgery and at the final follow-up visit. The change in the gap distance of the pars defect was remarkably significant after surgery and during the follow-up period. Only one of the 12 pars repaired was reported as a non-union at the final follow-up visit. Moreover, no surgery-related complications were reported in any of the cases. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic-assisted direct repair of pars defect without general anesthesia, a minimally invasive treatment option, supplemented with autograft and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, could be a satisfying treatment alternative for young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis.