ABSTRACT
The field of dermatology is experiencing the rapid deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), from mobile applications (apps) for skin cancer detection to large language models like ChatGPT that can answer generalist or specialist questions about skin diagnoses. With these new applications, ethical concerns have emerged. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify the applications of AI to the field of dermatology and to understand their ethical implications. We used a multifaceted search approach, searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for primary literature, following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidance. Our advanced query included terms related to dermatology, AI and ethical considerations. Our search yielded 202 papers. After initial screening, 68 studies were included. Thirty-two were related to clinical image analysis and raised ethical concerns for misdiagnosis, data security, privacy violations and replacement of dermatologist jobs. Seventeen discussed limited skin of colour representation in datasets leading to potential misdiagnosis in the general population. Nine articles about teledermatology raised ethical concerns, including the exacerbation of health disparities, lack of standardized regulations, informed consent for AI use and privacy challenges. Seven addressed inaccuracies in the responses of large language models. Seven examined attitudes toward and trust in AI, with most patients requesting supplemental assessment by a physician to ensure reliability and accountability. Benefits of AI integration into clinical practice include increased patient access, improved clinical decision-making, efficiency and many others. However, safeguards must be put in place to ensure the ethical application of AI.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology is rapidly increasing, with applications in dermatopathology, medical dermatology, cutaneous surgery, microscopy/spectroscopy and the identification of prognostic biomarkers (characteristics that provide information on likely patient health outcomes). However, with the rise of AI in dermatology, ethical concerns have emerged. We reviewed the existing literature to identify applications of AI in the field of dermatology and understand the ethical implications. Our search initially identified 202 papers, and after we went through them (screening), 68 were included in our review. We found that ethical concerns are related to the use of AI in the areas of clinical image analysis, teledermatology, natural language processing models, privacy, skin of colour representation, and patient and provider attitudes toward AI. We identified nine ethical principles to facilitate the safe use of AI in dermatology. These ethical principles include fairness, inclusivity, transparency, accountability, security, privacy, reliability, informed consent and conflict of interest. Although there are many benefits of integrating AI into clinical practice, our findings highlight how safeguards must be put in place to reduce rising ethical concerns.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Dermatology , Humans , Artificial Intelligence/ethics , Dermatology/ethics , Dermatology/methods , Telemedicine/ethics , Informed Consent/ethics , Confidentiality/ethics , Diagnostic Errors/ethics , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Computer Security/ethics , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/therapy , Mobile Applications/ethicsABSTRACT
The medical history underscores the significance of ethics in each advancement, with bioethics playing a pivotal role in addressing emerging ethical challenges in digital health (DH). This article examines the ethical dilemmas of innovations in DH, focusing on the healthcare system, professionals, and patients. Artificial Intelligence (AI) raises concerns such as confidentiality and algorithmic biases. Mobile applications (Apps) empower but pose challenges of access and digital literacy. Telemedicine (TM) democratizes and reduces healthcare costs but requires addressing the digital divide and interconsultation dilemmas; it necessitates high-quality standards with patient information protection and attention to equity in access. Wearables and the Internet of Things (IoT) transform healthcare but face ethical challenges like privacy and equity. 21st-century bioethics must be adaptable as DH tools demand constant review and consensus, necessitating health science faculties' preparedness for the forthcoming changes.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Telemedicine , Telemedicine/ethics , Humans , Artificial Intelligence/ethics , Bioethical Issues , Bioethics , Confidentiality/ethics , Mobile Applications/ethics , Digital Technology/ethics , Internet of Things/ethics , Digital HealthABSTRACT
Telemedicine, defined as the practice of delivering healthcare services remotely using information and communications technologies, raises a plethora of ethical considerations. As telemedicine evolves, its ethical dimensions play an increasingly pivotal role in balancing the benefits of advanced technologies, ensuring responsible healthcare practices within telemedicine environments, and safeguarding patient rights. Healthcare providers, patients, policymakers, and technology developers involved in telemedicine encounter numerous ethical challenges that need to be addressed. Key ethical topics include prioritizing the protection of patient rights and privacy, which entails ensuring equitable access to remote healthcare services and maintaining the doctor-patient relationship in virtual settings. Additional areas of focus encompass data security concerns and the quality of healthcare delivery, underscoring the importance of upholding ethical standards in the digital realm. A critical examination of these ethical dimensions highlights the necessity of establishing binding ethical guidelines and legal regulations. These measures could assist stakeholders in formulating effective strategies and methodologies to navigate the complex telemedicine landscape, ensuring adherence to the highest ethical standards and promoting patient welfare. A balanced approach to telemedicine ethics should integrate the benefits of telemedicine with proactive measures to address emerging ethical challenges and should be grounded in a well-prepared and respected ethical framework.
Subject(s)
Telemedicine , Telemedicine/ethics , Humans , Patient Rights/ethics , Confidentiality/ethics , Computer Security/ethics , Physician-Patient Relations/ethicsSubject(s)
Psychiatry , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/ethics , Telemedicine/trends , Tunisia , Psychiatry/ethics , Psychiatry/trends , Mental Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
The accelerated adoption of digital health technologies in the last decades has raised important ethical and safety concerns. Despite the potency and usefulness of digital health technologies, addressing safety, and ethical considerations needs to take greater prominence. This review paper focuses on ethical and safety facets, including health technology-related risks, users' safety and well-being risks, security and privacy concerns, and risks to transparency and diminished accountability associated with the utilization of digital health technologies. In order to maximize the potential of health technology benefits, awareness of safety risks, and ethical concerns should be increased, and the use of appropriate strategies and measures should be considered.
Subject(s)
Digital Health , Digital Technology , Humans , Computer Security/ethics , Confidentiality/ethics , Digital Health/ethics , Digital Technology/ethics , Patient Safety , Telemedicine/ethicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to assess the current research landscape of the application and use of large language models (LLMs) and generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), through tools such as ChatGPT in telehealth. Additionally, the review seeks to identify key areas for future research, with a particular focus on AI ethics considerations for responsible use and ensuring trustworthy AI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the scoping review methodological framework, a search strategy was conducted across 6 databases. To structure our review, we employed AI ethics guidelines and principles, constructing a concept matrix for investigating the responsible use of AI in telehealth. Using the concept matrix in our review enabled the identification of gaps in the literature and informed future research directions. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the review. Among the included studies, 5 were empirical, and 15 were reviews and perspectives focusing on different telehealth applications and healthcare contexts. Benefit and reliability concepts were frequently discussed in these studies. Privacy, security, and accountability were peripheral themes, with transparency, explainability, human agency, and contestability lacking conceptual or empirical exploration. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasized the potential of LLMs, especially ChatGPT, in telehealth. They provide insights into understanding the use of LLMs, enhancing telehealth services, and taking ethical considerations into account. By proposing three future research directions with a focus on responsible use, this review further contributes to the advancement of this emerging phenomenon of healthcare AI.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Telemedicine , Telemedicine/ethics , Artificial Intelligence/ethics , HumansABSTRACT
Currently, there are no adequate methods for dealing with changes in the healthcare system brought about by electronic health applications (eHealth) or the associated ethical implications in practice. This can be attributed to the lack of comprehensive interdisciplinary approaches that could support teams in integrating ethical considerations into the agile software development process. To close this gap, the DARE approach has been developed and tested in interdisciplinary collaborative research. The DARE method is a modular system designed to improve the development of ethically sound software in a deliberative, agile, and responsive manner.
Subject(s)
Codes of Ethics , Telemedicine , Telemedicine/ethics , Software Design , Software , Humans , Electronic Health Records/ethicsABSTRACT
Epidemic outbreaks of infectious diseases in conflict zones are complex threats to public health and humanitarian activities that require creativity approaches of reducing their damage. This narrative review focuses on the technology intersection with infectious disease response in conflict zones, and complexity of healthcare infrastructure, population displacement, and security risks. This narrative review explores how conflict-related destruction is harmful towards healthcare systems and the impediments to disease surveillance and response activities. In this regards, the review also considered the contributions of technological innovations, such as the improvement of epidemiological surveillance, mobile health (mHealth) technologies, genomic sequencing, and surveillance technologies, in strengthening infectious disease management in conflict settings. Ethical issues related to data privacy, security and fairness are also covered. By advisement on policy that focuses on investment in surveillance systems, diagnostic capacity, capacity building, collaboration, and even ethical governance, stakeholders can leverage technology to enhance the response to infectious disease in conflict settings and, thus, protect the global health security. This review is full of information for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners who are dealing with the issues of infectious disease outbreaks in conflicts worn areas.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Humans , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Armed Conflicts , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Health Policy , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Telemedicine/ethicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Digital approaches may be helpful in augmenting care to address unmet mental health needs, particularly for schizophrenia and severe mental illness (SMI). OBJECTIVE: An international multidisciplinary group was convened to reach a consensus on the challenges and potential solutions regarding collecting data, delivering treatment, and the ethical challenges in digital mental health approaches for schizophrenia and SMI. METHODS: The consensus development panel method was used, with an in-person meeting of 2 groups: the expert group and the panel. Membership was multidisciplinary including those with lived experience, with equal participation at all stages and coproduction of the consensus outputs and summary. Relevant literature was shared in advance of the meeting, and a systematic search of the recent literature on digital mental health interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis was completed to ensure that the panel was informed before the meeting with the expert group. RESULTS: Four broad areas of challenge and proposed solutions were identified: (1) user involvement for real coproduction; (2) new approaches to methodology in digital mental health, including agreed standards, data sharing, measuring harms, prevention strategies, and mechanistic research; (3) regulation and funding issues; and (4) implementation in real-world settings (including multidisciplinary collaboration, training, augmenting existing service provision, and social and population-focused approaches). Examples are provided with more detail on human-centered research design, lived experience perspectives, and biomedical ethics in digital mental health approaches for SMI. CONCLUSIONS: The group agreed by consensus on a number of recommendations: (1) a new and improved approach to digital mental health research (with agreed reporting standards, data sharing, and shared protocols), (2) equal emphasis on social and population research as well as biological and psychological approaches, (3) meaningful collaborations across varied disciplines that have previously not worked closely together, (4) increased focus on the business model and product with planning and new funding structures across the whole development pathway, (5) increased focus and reporting on ethical issues and potential harms, and (6) organizational changes to allow for true communication and coproduction with those with lived experience of SMI. This study approach, combining an international expert meeting with patient and public involvement and engagement throughout the process, consensus methodology, discussion, and publication, is a helpful way to identify directions for future research and clinical implementation in rapidly evolving areas and can be combined with measurements of real-world clinical impact over time. Similar initiatives will be helpful in other areas of digital mental health and similarly fast-evolving fields to focus research and organizational change and effect improved real-world clinical implementation.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/therapy , Telemedicine/ethics , Telemedicine/methods , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
This paper explores the security, privacy, and ethical implications of e-health data in Iran's healthcare network. A framework is proposed to ensure security and privacy in electronic health information processing across various institutions. The framework addresses aspects such as software/hardware, communication networks, patient safety, privacy, confidentiality, online health service regulations, commercial and judicial exploitation, and education/research. The study categorizes these requirements into seven main categories to safeguard health-oriented service recipients' security and privacy.
Subject(s)
Computer Security , Confidentiality , Electronic Health Records , Iran , Computer Security/ethics , Confidentiality/ethics , Electronic Health Records/ethics , Telemedicine/ethics , HumansABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, bioethical concerns were raised and there was even a â³resurgence of bioethics. â³ In this work, we review the scientific articles published by Spanish authors in relation to bioethical issues in the three years following the declaration of the pandemic. Seventy publications have been selected. Of all of them, the topic that lent itself to the most debate was that of prioritization in the use of health resources. A consensus was reached that ruled out that age could be considered as a sole exclusion criterion in healthcare or in a possible admission to the ICU. And the importance of taking special care of the most vulnerable and adapting care to the conditions of each patient without excluding anyone was recalled. Other relevant topics were the contrast between autonomy and the common good, the immune passport, vaccination, rigor in research and the publication of results, the professionalism of health personnel, misinformation, care for nursing homes, telemedicine, and the importance of the exercise of virtues. After the experience of both vulnerability and the need to exercise solidarity, many works raise the desire and the possibility of being able to overcome the pandemic being better.
Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Spain , Pandemics/ethics , Personal Autonomy , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/ethics , Vulnerable Populations , Age Factors , Vaccination/ethics , Nursing Homes/ethicsABSTRACT
In the management of the Covid 19 crisis, digital technologies were used in a major way. This article defends the hypothesis that these technologies took the form of a "tacit social experimentation". This article justifies this concept in three levels. The first part uses this concept to qualify the form of biopolitics that was implemented to manage the crisis. Digital technologies were used to discipline the population and, literally speaking, as instruments of knowledge of the population. Uncertainty forced experts to make preliminary observations and act to produce knowledge. Second, this article shows that the use of digital technologies during the crisis was experimental in a second sense. By promoting telemedicine within a more flexible legal framework, the authorities authorised an experimental use of telemedicine without knowledge or control of its side effects. Finally, the article defends the use of the concept of "tacit social experimentation" for ethical and political purposes. For indeed, understanding the experiments carried out during the crisis begs the question of the involvement of the participants and their democratic steering.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Digital Technology , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Telemedicine/ethics , Pandemics/ethics , PoliticsABSTRACT
The digitization of mental health enables significant shifts in clinical practice by harnessing vast amounts of data derived from the use of apps and wearables to enhance medical research, patient care, and health system efficiency. However, this process brings forth pertinent ethical and legal risks. Ethically, concerns primarily revolve around safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of sensitive data, alongside the transformation of the doctor-patient relationship through technological interaction. Within the regulatory realm, issues encompass the classification of these tools as medical products, ensuring normative assurance of effective protection of mental health data, and addressing potential legal risks within this domain. This article aims to provide an overarching view of this landscape, serving as a catalyst for the technological, ethical, and legal discourse necessitated by digital mental health.
Subject(s)
Confidentiality , Mental Health , Mobile Applications , Humans , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/ethics , Mobile Applications/ethics , Mobile Applications/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Telemedicine/ethics , Telemedicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Wearable Electronic Devices/ethics , Computer Security/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
The paper proposes, as the topic of analysis, the emergence of telemedicine, a tool that has been intensively used by doctors and other professionals during the covid pandemic. The essay, divided into two parts, first describes the current situation of telemedicine and afterwards proposes a few precautionary theses, related to telemedicine and the doctor-patient relationship according to the undestanding that the latter has been inherited and transmitted by medical anthropology and the medical humanities. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Telemedicine/ethics , Information Technology/ethicsABSTRACT
La telemedicina tiene un potencial significativo para beneficiar a los pacientes pero también plantea desafíos éticos, lo que podría debilitar la relación médico-paciente. La práctica ética de la telemedicina evita riesgos en la calidad, la seguridad y la continuidad de la atención médica. Este artículo se propone explicar cómo pueden desempeñarse las responsabilidades éticas fundamentales en telemedicina dentro del contexto peruano, en especial durante la actual pandemia por COVID-19. Se analiza los desafíos para la aplicación de la práctica de la telemedicina basada en la evidencia, la necesidad de entrenamiento en telemedicina, y la gestión de conflictos de intereses(AU)
Telemedicine has significant potential for the benefit of patients, but it also poses ethical challenges which could weaken the doctor-patient relationship. The ethical practice of telemedicine prevents risks related to the quality, safety and continuity of medical care. The purpose of the study was to describe the way in which the fundamental ethical responsibilities in the field of telemedicine are complied with in the Peruvian context, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis is conducted of the challenges faced by evidence-based telemedicine practice, the need for training in telemedicine, and the management of conflicts of interest(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Physician-Patient Relations , Telemedicine/ethics , Medical Care/methods , Information Technology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Honduras En Honduras y en el resto del mundo se atraviesa un reto de salud pública por la pandemia de la enfermedad COVID-19. Por lo cual, surgió la necesidad de poner en marcha la telesalud, considerando los principios deontológicos y éticos que rigen la profesión médica. Es importante romper paradigmas en la incorporación de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en los sistemas de salud. Debemos expandir nuestra visión en beneficio de la salud de las personas, teniendo en cuenta que siempre es y será, apropiado e ineludible cuestionar las innovaciones, para analizar y reflexionar los aspectos éticos y legales sobre su implementación y garantizar que lo implementado represente un beneficio directo para los usuarios. Desde este enfoque se reflexionó sobre la necesidad de implementar una telemedicina ética, humanista, cuyo fin prioritario sea preservar la vida, la confidencialidad, la seguridad de los pacientes, además la calidad y la continuidad de la atención médica...(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Telemedicine/ethics , Coronavirus Infections , Quality of Health Care/ethics , Ethics, MedicalABSTRACT
Abstract: Background: The surgical telementoring is a technology that involves surgical procedures guided by an expert or mentor, performed by other surgeons from a distance, using information and knowledge technologies. This therapeutic innovation has generated new opportunities to improve the surgical attention and the training of the surgeons. However, their ethical implications should be analyzed to clarify their use, to check the patient's safety and eliminate uncertainties. The characteristics of surgical telementoring generate specific challenges and ethical dilemmas that must be identified, analyzed and solved. Results: In this paper the ethical challenges and dilemmas of surgical telementoring identified and analyzed cover multiple aspects such as patient safety, privacy and vulnerability, the surgeon-mentor-patient relationship and informed consent, professional responsibility, cost-effectiveness analysis and Solidarity and social justice regarding the use of healthcare resources, the systematic approach to validation of the proposed new technology and conflicts of interest. For many of these issues solutions are provided, but they are still to be solved. Conclusions: surgical telementoring potentially improves patient healing and surgeon education. It will have a rapid evolution in the next years. This rapid growth should not be anticipated to the solid implantation of ethical guarantees for its use due to the particular characteristics that this technology has in the field of telemedicine.
Resumen: Antecedentes: El uso de tele-tutoría en cirugía es una tecnología que incluye procedimientos quirúrgicos guiados por un experto o tutor, realizado por otros cirujanos a distancia usando tecnologías de información y conocimiento. Esta innovación terapéutica ha generado nuevas oportunidades para mejorar la práctica de cirugía y la formación de los cirujanos. Sin embargo, deberían de analizarse sus implicaciones éticas para clarificar su uso, comprobar la seguridad del paciente y eliminar incertidumbres. Las características de la tele-tutoría en cirugía generan desafíos específicos y dilemas éticos que deben identificarse, analizarse y resolverse. Resultados: En este artículo se identificaron y analizaron múltiples aspectos en cuanto a desafíos éticos y dilemas de tele-tutoría en cirugía tales como: seguridad del paciente, privacidad y vulnerabilidad, la relación cirujano-tutor-paciente y el consentimiento informado, la responsabilidad profesional, análisis de costo-efectividad, solidaridad y justicia social respecto al uso de recursos en el cuidado de la salud, la aproximación sistemática para la validación de la nueva tecnología propuesta y los conflictos de interés. Para muchos de estos temas se han proporcionado soluciones, pero todavía no han sido resueltas. Conclusiones: La tele-tutoría en cirugía mejora potencialmente la sanación del paciente y la educación del cirujano. Va a tener una rápida evolución en los próximos años. Este rápido crecimiento no debería anticiparse a la implantación sólida de garantías éticas para su uso debido a las características particulares que tiene esta tecnología en el campo de la tele-medicina.
Resumo: Fundo: A cirurgia teleguiada é uma tecnologia que envolve procedimentos cirúrgicos, guiados por um especialista ou mentor, executados por outros cirurgiões à distância, usando tecnologias da informação e do conhecimento. Esta inovação terapêutica tem gerado novas oportunidades para melhorar a atenção cirúrgica e a formação dos cirurgiões. No entanto, suas implicações éticas devem ser analisadas para esclarecer seu uso, para verificar a segurança do paciente e eliminar as incertezas. As características da cirurgia teleguiada geram desafios específicos e dilemas éticos que devem ser identificados, analisados e resolvidos. Resultados: Neste artigo os desafios éticos e dilemas da cirurgia teleguiada identificados e analisados vislumbram vários aspectos como a segurança do paciente, sua privacidade e vulnerabilidade, o relacionamento paciente-cirurgião-mentor e consentimento informado, responsabilidade profissional, análise custo-eficácia e solidariedade e justiça social em relação ao uso dos recursos de saúde, a abordagem sistemática para validação da tecnologia nova proposta e conflitos de interesse. Para muitas destas questões são fornecidas soluções, mas muitas ainda estão para serem resolvidas. Conclusões: a cirurgia teleguiada potencialmente melhora o atendimento do paciente e o ensino do cirurgião. Vai ter uma rápida evolução nos próximos anos. Este rápido crescimento não deve ser antecipado para a implantação contínua de garantias éticas para seu uso devido as características particulares que esta tecnologia tem no campo da telemedicina.