The diversity and clinical implications of genetic variants influencing clopidogrel bioactivation and response in the Emirati population.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a widely prescribed prodrug that requires activation via specific pharmacogenes to exert its anti-platelet function. Genetic variations in the genes encoding its transporter, metabolizing enzymes, and target receptor lead to variability in its activation and platelet inhibition and, consequently, its efficacy. This variability increases the risk of secondary cardiovascular events, and therefore, some variations have been utilized as genetic biomarkers when prescribing clopidogrel. METHODS: Our study examined clopidogrel-related genes (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1, and P2Y12R) in a cohort of 298 healthy Emiratis individuals. The study used whole exome sequencing (WES) data to comprehensively analyze pertinent variations of these genes, including their minor allele frequencies, haplotype distribution, and their resulting phenotypes. RESULTS: Our data shows that approximately 37% (n = 119) of the cohort are likely to benefit from the use of alternative anti-platelet drugs due to their classification as intermediate or poor CYP2C19 metabolizers. Additionally, more than 50% of the studied cohort exhibited variants in ABCB1, PON1, and P2YR12 genes, potentially influencing clopidogrel's transport, enzymatic clearance, and receptor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these alleles and genotype frequencies may explain the clinical differences in medication response across different ethnicities and predict adverse events. Our findings underscore the need to consider genetic variations in prescribing clopidogrel, with potential implications for implementing personalized anti-platelet therapy among Emiratis based on their genetic profiles.

Ticlopidine protects hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury via suppressing ferroptosis.

Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major cause of liver damage during hepatic resection, transplantation, and other surgical procedures, often leading to graft failure and liver dysfunction. Recent studies have identified ferroptosis, a form of regulated cell death characterized by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, as a key contributor to IRI. In this study, we investigated the protective effects of Ticlopidine, a thienopyridine compound and platelet aggregation inhibitor, on hepatic IRI. Using a C57BL/6J mouse model, we demonstrated that prophylactic Ticlopidine treatment significantly reduced necrotic and fibrotic areas in liver tissues, as well as serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Prussian Blue staining revealed that Ticlopidine pretreatment decreased iron accumulation in hepatic tissues, whereas markers of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal) and ferroptosis (PTGS2) were significantly downregulated. Additionally, Ticlopidine ameliorated inflammatory infiltration as indicated by reduced Gr-1 staining. In vitro, Ticlopidine dose-dependently inhibited ferroptosis induced by various inducers in liver cancer cell lines HUH7 and fibrosarcoma cells HT1080. The protective effects involved partial rescue of lipid peroxidation, significant reduction of ferrous iron levels, and strong protection against mitochondrial damage. These findings suggested that Ticlopidine acts as a broad-spectrum ferroptosis inhibitor, offering a promising therapeutic approach for protecting the liver against IRI.

Differential inhibition of platelet function by cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel.

PURPOSE: To assess the antiplatelet effect of cilostazol clinically, we compared the effects of cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel on various platelet function tests. METHODS: We recruited patients with ischemic stroke at high risk of recurrence who were treated with clopidogrel alone within 180 days after stroke onset. Subjects underwent baseline platelet function tests, and were then randomly assigned to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising clopidogrel and cilostazol or clopidogrel monotherapy (SAPT). After 6 months, platelet function was measured again and compared to that at baseline in each group, and the rate of change was compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, but 4 patients were excluded for various reasons. In total, 30 subjects (13 in DAPT and 17 in SAPT group) were analyzed. Adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced aggregation, VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (platelet reactivity index: PRI) and plasma p-selectin concentration were significantly lower (P = 0.004, 0.042, 0.049, 0.003 and 0.006 respectively), while VerifyNow % inhibition was significantly higher at 6 months compared to baseline (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group only. Comparison of the rate of change in each parameter from baseline to 6 months showed that while PRI decreased at a greater rate (P = 0.012), VerifyNow % inhibition increased at a greater rate (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group than the SAPT group. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibitory effects of adjunctive cilostazol added to clopidogrel on platelet function differed by type of platelet function test. VerifyNow % inhibition and PRI were more inhibited than the other platelet function tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CSPS.com substudy in TWMU (UMIN000026672), registered on April 1, 2017. This study was performed as a substudy of CSPS.com (UMIN000012180, registered on October 31, 2013) and was retrospectively registered.

Decreased platelet miR-199a-5p level might lead to high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease.

Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment. Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy. Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway. This study aimed to investigate the association between platelet miRNA levels and clopidogrel efficacy. Here we recruited 508 CAD patients who underwent clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy and determined the platelet reactivity index (PRI) to evaluate antiplatelet reactivity responses to clopidogrel. Subsequently, 22 patients with extreme clopidogrel response were selected for platelet small RNA sequencing. Another 41 CAD patients taking clopidogrel were collected to verify the differentially expressed candidate miRNAs. We found the metabolic types of the CYP2C19 enzyme (based on CYP2C19 * 2 and * 3 polymorphisms) could significantly affect the PRI of CAD patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Chinese. A total of 43 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the platelets from the 22 extreme clopidogrel response samples, and 109 miRNAs were differentially expressed in the 13 CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers with extreme clopidogrel response. Platelet miR-199a-5p levels were correlated negatively with PRI after clopidogrel therapy. Studies in cultured cells revealed that miR-199a-5p inhibited the expression of VASP, a key effector protein downstream of the P2Y12 receptor. In conclusion, we found the expression of VASP could be inhibited by miR-199a-5p, and decreased platelet miR-199a-5p was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in CAD patients.

What is the context?● Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is widely used in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, while some patients exhibit high platelet activity when receiving the combined treatment.● Current environmental and genetic factors could only explain part of the variability in clopidogrel efficacy.● Human platelets harbor abundant miRNAs which might affect clopidogrel efficacy by regulating the expression of key proteins in the clopidogrel antiplatelet signaling pathway.What is new?● We found that decreased platelet miR-199a-5p level was associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity.● Overexpression of miR-199a-5p significantly down-regulated the expression of VASP protein in cultured cells.What is the impact?● The current study provided new insights into the exploration of interindividual variability in clopidogrel response from the perspective of miR-199a-5p and VASP interaction.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Aspirin versus Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic regimen in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. At least, one antiplatelet agent in combination with OAC is recommended after PCI for 6-12 months. Clopidogrel is used most frequently in this setting. However, data comparing P2Y12 inhibition with clopidogrel versus cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is missing. It is well known that the antiplatelet effects of ASA and clopidogrel are frequently impaired (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). In this pilot investigation, we compared the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel versus ASA. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center database analysis, we investigated platelet reactivity by light transmission aggregometry in patients under different antiplatelet regimes. Results were presented as maximum of aggregation (MoA). HTPR to ASA and to clopidogrel were assessed. RESULTS: 755 patients were enrolled. 677 were on ASA, 521 were on clopidogrel, and 198 had OAC. Overall mean age was 73 ± 13.4 years, and 458 (60.7%) were male. HTPR to ASA occurred in 94/677 patients (13.9%), and mean arachidonic acid-induced MoA was 14.15 ± 19.04%. HTPR to clopidogrel occurred in 241/521 patients (46.3%), and mean adenosine diphosphate-induced MoA was 50.06 ± 20.42%. HTPR to clopidogrel was significantly more frequent than HTPR to ASA; single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT)-mono ASA: 27/199 (13.6%) versus mono clopidogrel: 6/18 (33.3%); p = 0.037; SAPT with OAC-OAC with ASA: 8/35 (22.9%) versus OAC with clopidogrel: 27/60 (45%); p = 0.046. Same difference in HTPR contingency could be shown in subgroups of dual antiplatelet therapy and ASA + clopidogrel + OAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Impaired pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was more frequent as HTPR to ASA. Hence, ASA should be tested in combination with OAC post-PCI.

Circadian variations of platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in patients treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Evidence assessing potential diurnal variations of platelet reactivity in patients on clopidogrel treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) are currently lacking. We prospectively enrolled 15 patients affected by stable coronary artery disease (CAD) previously treated with elective PCI and on clopidogrel for at least 8 days (administered at 8 a.m.). A significant heterogeneity in diurnal levels of ADP-dependent platelet aggregation was found (p = 0.0004), with a peak of platelet reactivity occurring at the 6 a.m. assessment, which resulted significantly increased compared to the afternoon (6 p.m.) evaluation (255 ± 66 vs 184 ± 67, p = 0.002). In addition, at the early-morning evaluation a considerably high proportion of patients with high platelet reactivity (53.3%) were observed. In conclusion, clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition in patients with CCS after elective PCI follows a circadian rhythm, thus suggesting that a consistent and durable antiplatelet inhibition is often failed with standard clopidogrel administration at morning.

Repurposing the Antiplatelet Agent Ticlopidine to Counteract the Acute Phase of ER Stress Condition: An Opportunity for Fighting Coronavirus Infections and Cancer.

Different pathological conditions, including viral infections and cancer, can have a massive impact on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), causing severe damage to the cell and exacerbating the disease. In particular, coronavirus infections, including SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), responsible for COVID-19, cause ER stress as a consequence of the enormous amounts of viral glycoproteins synthesized, the perturbation of ER homeostasis and the modification of ER membranes. Therefore, ER has a central role in the viral life cycle, thus representing one of the Achilles' heels on which to focus therapeutic intervention. On the other hand, prolonged ER stress has been demonstrated to promote many pro-tumoral attributes in cancer cells, having a key role in tumor growth, metastasis and response to therapies. In this report, adopting a repurposing approach of approved drugs, we identified the antiplatelet agent ticlopidine as an interferent of the unfolded protein response (UPR) via sigma receptors (SRs) modulation. The promising results obtained suggest the potential use of ticlopidine to counteract ER stress induced by viral infections, such as COVID-19, and cancer.

The Effectiveness of Antiplatelet Therapy and the Factors Influencing It in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of antiplatelet medication in our practice and to investigate the factors that influence it. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort observational study was conducted, in which 193 patients with ACS were enrolled. The patients were stented in the catheterization laboratory between May 2019 and October 2020, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and were receiving DAPT. Their platelet functions were tested using a Multiplate Analyzer. In addition to this, clinical data, demographics, laboratory tests, and cardiovascular risk factors were also analyzed. Results: 43.46% of the patients treated with aspirin were found to be resistant to it. This phenomenon was more common in men (48.17% vs. 31.48%, p = 0.036), and it was associated with being under the age of 50 (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.11-3.90) and weighing over 70 kg (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.21-7.40). Most of the patients treated with clopidogrel were in the optimal treatment window, while about half of the patients treated with ticagrelor had an exaggerated pharmacological response. Among the laboratory parameters, leukocytosis and platelet count were found to be determinants of platelet reactivity for both the aspirin and ticagrelor treatments. Conclusions: Many patients treated with antiplatelet agents are outside of the treatment window. The results obtained showed that low doses of gastro-resistant aspirin tablets are ineffective, and their efficacy can be influenced by various clinical and laboratory factors. Patients receiving ticagrelor have significantly reduced platelet reactivity, influenced only by certain laboratory indicators. The pandemic significantly influenced the results of the platelet aggregation tests only in patients treated with clopidogrel.

The role of platelet glycoprotein IIb / IIIa inhibitors in current treatment of acute coronary syndrome.

Current management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes a dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. For patients without a high risk of bleeding, prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred, since their effect is more pronounced, less dependent on metabolism of a specific patient, and occurs faster that the effect of clopidogrel. The prescription rate of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb / IIIa) receptor inhibitors has considerably decreased. However, these drugs remain relevant in percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with a high risk of coronary thrombosis or a massive coronary thrombus, in thrombotic complications of the procedure, and in the "no-reflow" phenomenon. The intravenous route of GP IIb / IIIa inhibitor administration provides their effectiveness in patients with difficulties of drug intake or with impaired absorption of oral medications. This review presents clinical and pharmacological characteristics of various GP IIb / IIIa inhibitors and data of randomized clinical studies and registries of recent years that evaluated results of their use in patients with ACS.

Decreased Platelet Inhibition by Thienopyridines in Hyperuricemia.

PURPOSE: Hyperuricemia carries an increased risk of atherothrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This may at least in part be due to inadequate P2Y12 inhibition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the potential association between hyperuricemia and decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 antagonists. METHODS: Levels of uric acid as well as on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were assessed in 301 clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing elective angioplasty and stenting, and in 206 prasugrel- (n = 118) or ticagrelor-treated (n = 88) ACS patients following acute PCI. Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity (HRPR) were based on previous studies showing an association of test results with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Hyperuricemia was significantly associated with increased on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients in univariate analyses and after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics by multivariate regression analyses. In contrast, ticagrelor-treated patients without and with hyperuricemia showed similar levels of on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP. HRPR occurred more frequently in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients with hyperuricemia than in those with normal uric acid levels. In contrast, hyperuricemic patients receiving ticagrelor did not have a higher risk of HRPR compared with those with normal uric acid levels. CONCLUSION: Hyperuricemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by thienopyridines but a normal response to ticagrelor. It remains to be established if lowering uric acid increases the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and prasugrel in hyperuricemic patients with HRPR.

2-Substituted thienotetrahydropyridine derivatives: Allosteric ectonucleotidase inhibitors.

The antithrombotic prodrugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel are thienotetrahydro-pyridine derivatives that are metabolized in the liver to produce thiols that irreversibly block adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-activated P2Y12 receptors on thrombocytes. In their native, nonmetabolized form, both drugs were reported to act as inhibitors of ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase1, CD39). CD39 catalyzes the extracellular hydrolysis of nucleoside tri- and diphosphates, mainly adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and ADP, yielding adenosine monophosphate, which is further hydrolyzed by ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) to produce adenosine. While ATP has proinflammatory effects, adenosine is a potent anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive agent. Inhibitors of CD39 and CD73 have potential as novel checkpoint inhibitors for the immunotherapy of cancer and infection. In the present study, we investigated 2-substituted thienotetrahydropyridine derivatives, structurally related to ticlopidine, as CD39 inhibitors. Due to their substituent on the 2-position, they will not be metabolically transformed into reactive thiols and can, therefore, be expected to be devoid of P2Y12 receptor-antagonistic activity in vivo. Several of the investigated 2-substituted thienotetrahydropyridine derivatives showed concentration-dependent inhibition of CD39. The most potent derivative, 32, showed similar CD39-inhibitory potency to ticlopidine, both acting as allosteric inhibitors. Compound 32 showed an improved selectivity profile: While ticlopidine blocked several NTPDase isoenzymes, 32 was characterized as a novel dual inhibitor of CD39 and CD73.

Stronger inhibitory effects of Ticagrelor plus aspirin compared with Clopidogrel plus aspirin on arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in patients with acute coronary syndrome with PCI.

Antagonists of the Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) receptor, P2Y12, may inhibit platelet aggregation as a result of stimulation with arachidonic acid (AA). The potent P2Y12 blocker, Ticagrelor has greater anti-platelet effects than Clopidogrel. We explored the effects of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel on mean maximum aggregation ratios (MAR%) in response to AA stimulation in patients receiving aspirin in conventional doses. A total of 613 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients were followed from October 2017 to October 2018. At the one- and six-month follow-up visit, mean AA-MAR% was lower in the Ticagrelor group when compared with the Clopidogrel group (28.9% vs 31.7%, 28.4% vs 31.0%, p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). BARC1-2 bleeding occurred with greater frequency with Ticagrelor than in patients treated with Clopidogrel (29.3% vs 9.5%, p<0.001; 23.5% vs 9.3%, p<0.001). Excessive platelet inhibition and decreased AA-MAR% were considered the main reasons for the severe subcutaneous/dermal bleeding in Ticagrelor treated patients.

Impacts of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on bioavailability and effect on platelet adhesion of vicagrel, a novel thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor.

AIMS: We investigated the impacts of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vicagrel in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers (EMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs; 16 subjects/group) participated in a randomized, open-label, 2-period cross-over study. Each study period lasted 7 days, with a loading dose of 24 mg of vicagrel or 300 mg of clopidogrel on day 1, and maintenance doses of 6 mg of vicagrel or 75 mg of clopidogrel daily from day 2 to day 7. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed on day 1 and day 7. RESULTS: After a loading dose, the AUC0-t of the active metabolite H4 by vicagrel was slightly lower in IMs and PMs (decreased by 21 and 27%, respectively) compared to EMs. Similar results were found after maintenance doses. In EMs, the AUC0-t of H4 by vicagrel was somewhat higher than clopidogrel after the loading dose, and comparable with clopidogrel (90% confidence interval 0.94, 1.21) after the maintenance doses. However, it was much higher than clopidogrel in PMs, with a 1.28-fold (loading dose) and a 73% (maintenance doses) increases compared to clopidogrel (P < 0.001). Consequently, the inhibition of platelet aggregation by vicagrel was greater than clopidogrel after both loading dose (28.2 vs 12.4% at 4 hours, P < 0.01) and maintenance doses (42.8 vs 24.6% at 4 hours, P < 0.001) in PMs. CONCLUSIONS: CYP2C19 polymorphisms have less impact on vicagrel as compared to clopidogrel. Drug exposure and response to vicagrel in PMs were even higher than to clopidogrel in IMs.

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole versus clopidogrel alone or aspirin and dipyridamole in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia (TARDIS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Intensive antiplatelet therapy with three agents might be more effective than guideline treatment for preventing recurrent events in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole) with that of guideline-based antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: We did an international, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial in adult participants with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 48 h of onset. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio using computer randomisation to receive loading doses and then 30 days of intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin 75 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily) or guideline-based therapy (comprising either clopidogrel alone or combined aspirin and dipyridamole). Randomisation was stratified by country and index event, and minimised with prognostic baseline factors, medication use, time to randomisation, stroke-related factors, and thrombolysis. The ordinal primary outcome was the combined incidence and severity of any recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic; assessed using the modified Rankin Scale) or TIA within 90 days, as assessed by central telephone follow-up with masking to treatment assignment, and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN47823388. FINDINGS: 3096 participants (1556 in the intensive antiplatelet therapy group, 1540 in the guideline antiplatelet therapy group) were recruited from 106 hospitals in four countries between April 7, 2009, and March 18, 2016. The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee. The incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA did not differ between intensive and guideline therapy (93 [6%] participants vs 105 [7%]; adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·67-1·20, p=0·47). By contrast, intensive antiplatelet therapy was associated with more, and more severe, bleeding (adjusted cOR 2·54, 95% CI 2·05-3·16, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Among patients with recent cerebral ischaemia, intensive antiplatelet therapy did not reduce the incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA, but did significantly increase the risk of major bleeding. Triple antiplatelet therapy should not be used in routine clinical practice. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, British Heart Foundation.

Comparison of factors affecting platelet reactivity in various platelet function tests.

Previous studies have reported that various factors affect ADP-induced platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical and laboratory variables for platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are dependent on the assay used. We enrolled 904 patients receiving DAPT following coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was measured using three methods: the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) ADP assay, and the light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) ADP assay at 24-48 h following coronary intervention. The VerifyNow results demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with hematocrit value (r = -0.268, p < 0.0001); however, MEA results had no such correlation with hematocrit (r = 0.044, p = 0.188). There was a positive correlation between the MEA results and platelet count (r = 0.255, p < 0.0001). LTA was weakly influenced by hematocrit (r = -0.064, p = 0.057) and platelet count (r = 0.069, p = 0.040). Gender (odds ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.14, p = 0.013) and hematocrit (odds ratio 0.91,95% CI 0.88-0.94, p < 0.0001) were the independent variables for HPR by VerifyNow. Smoking (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.036) and platelet count (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p < 0.0001) were independent factors for HPR when using the MEA assay, whereas platelet count (odds ratio 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p = 0.006) was identified as the only independent variable for HPR when using LTA. The incidence of HPR and the influencing variables involved are dependent on the platelet function test used.

Purinergic receptor P2RY12-dependent microglial closure of the injured blood-brain barrier.

Microglia are integral functional elements of the central nervous system, but the contribution of these cells to the structural integrity of the neurovascular unit has not hitherto been assessed. We show here that following blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, P2RY12 (purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12)-mediated chemotaxis of microglia processes is required for the rapid closure of the BBB. Mice treated with the P2RY12 inhibitor clopidogrel, as well as those in which P2RY12 was genetically ablated, exhibited significantly diminished movement of juxtavascular microglial processes and failed to close laser-induced openings of the BBB. Thus, microglial cells play a previously unrecognized protective role in the maintenance of BBB integrity following cerebrovascular damage. Because clopidogrel antagonizes the platelet P2Y12 receptor, it is widely prescribed for patients with coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease. As such, these observations suggest the need for caution in the postincident continuation of P2RY12-targeted platelet inhibition.

Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease with a history of limb revascularization, the optimal antithrombotic regimen for long-term management is unknown. METHODS: The EUCLID trial (Examining Use of Ticagrelor In PAD) randomized 13 885 patients with peripheral artery disease to treatment with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Patients were enrolled based on an abnormal ankle-brachial index ≤0.80 or a previous lower extremity revascularization. This analysis focuses on the 7875 (57%) patients enrolled based on the previous lower extremity revascularization criterion. Patients could not be enrolled within 30 days of most recent revascularization, and patients with an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: Patients with a previous revascularization had a mean age of 66 years, 73% were male, and the median baseline ankle-brachial index was 0.78. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization had similar rates of the primary composite end point (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.23, P=0.12) and statistically significantly higher rates of myocardial infarction (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.55, P=0.005) and acute limb ischemia (HR 4.23, 95% CI 2.86-6.25, P<0.001) when compared with patients enrolled based on ankle-brachial index criteria. No differences in ticagrelor- versus clopidogrel-treated patients were found for the primary efficacy end point (11.4% vs 11.3%; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88-1.15; P=0.90), all-cause mortality (9.2% vs 9.2%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.15; P=0.93), acute limb ischemia (2.5% vs 2.5%; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.36; P=0.84), or major bleeding (1.9% vs 1.8%; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83-1.59; P=0.41). The median duration of follow-up was ≈30 months. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization for peripheral artery disease had higher rates of myocardial infarction and acute limb ischemia, with similar composite rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke when compared with patients enrolled based on the ankle-brachial index criterion. No significant differences were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for reduction of cardiovascular or acute limb events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01732822.

Decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 receptor blockers in anaemia.

BACKGROUND: Anaemic patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting are at an increased risk of ischaemic events, which may be caused by an inadequate response to antiplatelet therapy with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 inhibitors. In the current study, we investigated the associations between anaemia and on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated (group 1, n = 306) and prasugrel-/ticagrelor-treated (group 2, n = 109) patients undergoing elective and acute angioplasty with stent implantation, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation was determined by flow cytometry in both groups. On-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to ADP was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in both groups, and by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R in group 1. P-selectin expression was measured by flow cytometry in group 2. RESULTS: In both groups, anaemia was associated with significantly higher MPA formation in response to ADP (both P ≤ .02). Moreover, by LTA maximal aggregation in response to ADP was significantly higher in patients with anaemia in both groups (both P < .05), and anaemic patients in group 1 had a significantly higher on-treatment platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R than those without anaemia (both P < .001). In group 2, significantly higher platelet surface expression of P-selectin was seen in anaemia after stimulation with ADP (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Anaemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by ADP P2Y12 receptor antagonists after elective and acute percutaneous interventions with stent implantation. However, due to inconsistencies between different platelet function tests additional data are needed to clarify the role of anaemia for platelet inhibition.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Pivotal clinical trials found that ticagrelor reduced ischaemic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel, and also that the benefit gradually increased with the reduction in creatinine clearance. However, the underlying mechanisms remains poorly explored. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 60 hospitalized Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 ) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then followed by 90 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, then followed by 75 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the P2Y12 reactive unit (PRU) value assessed by VerifyNow at 30 days. The plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and clopidogrel and their active metabolites were measured in the first 10 patients in each group at baseline, and at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after the loading dose. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched between the two groups. Our results indicated a markedly lower PRU in patients treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel at 30 days (32.6 ± 11.29 vs. 203.7 ± 17.92; P < 0.001) as well as at 2 h, 8 h and 24 h after the loading dose (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX showed a similar time to reach maximum concentration (Cmax ) of 8 h, with the maximum concentration (Cmax ) of 355 (242.50-522.00) ng ml-1 and 63.20 (50.80-85.15) ng ml-1 , respectively. Both clopidogrel and its active metabolite approached the Cmax at 2 h, with a similar Cmax of 8.67 (6.64-27.75) ng ml-1 vs. 8.53 (6.94-15.93) ng ml-1 . CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor showed much more potent platelet inhibition in comparison with clopidogrel in patients with CKD and NSTE-ACS.

Impact of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes and Antiplatelet Potency of Clopidogrel in Caucasian Poststroke Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Variable response after clopidogrel is well documented and may affect major adverse clinical events after stroke. Impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms is an established marker linked to variable response after clopidogrel. However, the association of certain genetic polymorphisms with prediction of major adverse clinical events following stroke still remains controversial, especially in Caucasians. STUDY QUESTION: The primary aim was to evaluate the impact of CYP2C19 allele *2 in heterozygote form on major adverse clinical events in Caucasian poststroke survivors treated with clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to analyze the potential link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and variable response after clopidogrel. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty patients of Caucasian origin following documented ischemic stroke were included. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and matched with various CYP2C19 loss-of-function genetic polymorphisms and major adverse clinical events (composite of vascular deaths, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Over the mean follow-up of 14.9 months, 19 patients experienced major adverse clinical events. The risk of major adverse clinical events was nearly 3-fold in loss-of-function allele carriers (hazard ratio = 2.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.083-7.786; P = 0.013), whereas the risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack alone was also higher (hazard ratio = 3.170; 95% confidence interval, 1.281-7.849; P = 0.034). Platelet activity was strongly associated with allele *2 status (rs = 0.21, P = 0.016) but not with other genetic polymorphisms. Carriers of allele*2 exhibited lower platelet response to adenosine diphosphate-mean LTA (30.1% vs. 42.0%; P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in LTA results with other agonists. Strong association of increase in adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation with diabetes mellitus (rs = 0.20, P = 0.023), increasing age (rs = 0.23, P = 0.008), and conversely diminishing over increased weight (rs = 0.23, P = 0.009) was also detected. The carriers of other gene allele variants lack uniformed impact on variable response after clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: Even heterozygous CYP2C19*2 allele carriers among Caucasian patients after ischemic stroke had a higher risk of major adverse clinical events. The LTA, however, did not predict major adverse clinical events. The exact clinical utility of these findings is still uncertain and requires large outcome-driven randomized trial in Caucasians for proof of concept.