Predictors for emergency readmission in patients with ureteral calculi: a focus on pain management and stone location.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with ureteral calculi in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging due to high revisit rates. PURPOSE: To identify predictors of revisits among patients with ureteral calculi in the ED. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from patients who presented at a tertiary academic hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea, between February 2018 and December 2019, were analyzed retrospectively. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Variables, including the respiratory rate (RR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), duration of pain, number of analgesic doses, location of ureteral calculi, and ED length of stay (LOS) were examined using logistic regression. We also examined some additional variables included in the STONE and CHOKAI scoring systems to examine their association with revisit. RESULTS: Significant predictors of revisits included the number of analgesic doses and the location of ureteral calculi. Patients who required multiple analgesic doses or those with proximal or mid-ureteral calculi were more likely to revisit the ED. Although the STONE and CHOKAI scores could predict uncomplicated ureteral calculi, we found that the CHOKAI score is a valuable tool for predicting the likelihood of patient revisits (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Effective pain management and consideration of calculi location are important for predicting patient revisits. More research is required to validate findings, develop precise predictive models, and empower tailored care for high-risk patients. In patients with ureteral calculi in the ED, the number of analgesics given and stone location predict return visits. Proximal ureteral calculi on CT may require early urologic intervention to prevent pain-related revisits.

Can shear wave elastography predict the success of shock­wave lithotripsy used in renal stones treatment? A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usage of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prediction of the success rate of shock­wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment of renal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, SWL was performed for 100 patients presented with renal stones in the duration from May 2022 to August 2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups SWL responders and non-responders. The study compared between the 2 groups in terms of baseline parameters of the patients as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), stone size, stone location, stone density (HU), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), the degree of hydronephrosis and the stone elastography values. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant relation between stone-free rate and degree of obstruction (p = 0.628), stone size (p = 0.390) upper calyceal location (p = 0.17), middle calyceal location (p = 0.66), and renal pelvis location (p = 1.0). Nevertheless, a statistically significant relation was found as regards lower calyceal location, stone density (HU), and stone Elastography values using multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of stone density by shear wave elastography (SWE) can be used as an alternative to HU in decision-making before SWL. SWL success depends mainly on stone site, HU, and SWE values.

CT-based radiomics for predicting success of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the predictive value of CT-based radiomics in determining the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment for ureteral stones larger than 10mm in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 301 eligible patients (165/136 successful/unsuccessful) who underwent SWL were retrospectively evaluated and divided into a training cohort (n = 241) and a test cohort (n = 60) following an 8:2 ratio. Univariate analysis was performed to assess clinical characteristics for constructing a nomogram. Radiomics and conventional radiological characteristics of stones were evaluated. Following feature selection, radiomics and radiological models were constructed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), K nearest neighbor (KNN), and XGBoost. The models' performance was compared using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score. Finally, a nomogram was created incorporating the best image model signature and clinical predictors. RESULTS: The SVM-based radiomics model showed superior predictive performance in both training and test cohorts (AUC: 0.956, 0.891, respectively). The nomogram, which combined SVM-based radiomics signature with proximal ureter diameter (PUD), demonstrated further improved predictive performance in the test cohort (AUC: 0.891 vs. 0.939, P = 0.166). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of CT-derived radiomics and PUD showed excellent ability to predict SWL treatment success in patients with ureteral stones larger than 10mm, providing a promising approach for clinical decision-making.

Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?

PURPOSE: We aimed to define factors affecting the non-invasive overall treatment success (medical expulsive therapy (MET) ± shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)) for uncomplicated ureteral steinstrasse (SS) clearance. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent SWL for renal stones between 2017 and 2021. Patients with uncomplicated SS were included. All patient's demographic and radiological data, e.g., age, gender, pre-SWL stenting, SS site, type, leading stone size in widest diameter (< 10 mm and ≥ 10 mm), ureteral wall thickness (UWT) in mm against the leading stone were collected. If SS was diagnosed, medical treatment was given for 4 weeks. In case of MET failure, either SWL for the leading stones + MET or direct URS was done. Non-invasive treatment success (SFR) was considered if complete clearance of SS occurred with no complications or the need for invasive intervention. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included with mean age of 45.9 ± 12.4 years. SFR in case of MET only occurred in 27.9%. Complications happened in 26 patients (17.9%). Non-invasive treatment SFR was achieved in 78 patients (53.8%) totally where SS type I, leading stone size ≤ 10 mm type and decreased UWT around the leading stone increased treatment success. CONCLUSION: Ureteral wall thickness is an important factor predicting SS management success. Besides the decreased UWT, non-invasive management should be offered for type I SS with leading stone ≤ 10 mm.

Impact of previously failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on ureterorenoscopy outcomes in upper urinary tract stones: a prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to prospectively evaluate the impact of previously failed SWL on subsequent URS outcomes in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2021 and May 2023, one hundred thirty-six patients with proximal ureteral stones < 1.5 cm and renal stones < 2.5 cm who were candidates for URS were prospectively assigned to a non-SWL group, which included patients without a history of failed SWL before URS, and a post-SWL group, which included patients with a history of failed SWL before URS. The success rate was the primary outcome. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The stone-free rate was 83.3% in the post-SWL group versus 81.3% in the non-SWL group, and 8.3% in the post-SWL group versus 9.4% in the non-SWL group had clinically insignificant residual fragments. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate or success rate between the groups. No significant differences in intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative time, intraoperative stone appearance, perioperative complications, or the presence of embedded fragments in the ureteral mucosa were detected between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with patients who underwent primary URS, patients who underwent salvage URS for upper urinary tract stones had similar stone-free rates, success rates, operative times, fluoroscopy times, and complication rates without any significant differences.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the treatment of post-SWL steinstrasse: a randomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Holmium laser lithotripsy with that of extracorporeal shock lithotripsy (SWL) for post-SWL ureteral steinstrasse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2022 to July 2023, 36 patients with post-SWL ureteral steinstrasse were randomly divided into laser lithotripsy and SWL groups. Patients with pain, moderate to marked hydronephrosis, large leading stone fragments, and showing no spontaneous resolution within 3-4 weeks after medical expulsive therapy were included. Patients with sepsis were excluded. The success rate was the primary outcome. We compared the perioperative data between the groups. RESULTS: The success rate was higher in the ureteroscopy group than in the SWL group (p = 0.034). SWL was a significantly longer operation, and the fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the SWL group than in the URS group (p = 0.027). Auxiliary procedures were more frequently performed in the SWL group than in the URS group (p = 0.02). JJ stents were inserted in 100% of patients in the URS group. Three patients (16.7%) underwent conversion to laser ureteroscopy after the second SWL session failed. No significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications was observed between the groups, but the incidence of postoperative LUT was high in the ureteroscopy group. The mean hospital stay was 30 h in the ureteroscopy group. SWL was performed without the need for hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for steinstrasse was safe and effective, with a higher success rate, shorter fluoroscopy time, and shorter recovery period than SWL.

Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath for complex steinstrasse.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath (PC-UAS) for complex steinstrasse. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients (male: 18; female: 13) with steinstrasse were enrolled, six of whom had concurrent kidney stones. The mean cumulative stone size was 2.7 ± 1.3 cm. The patients were treated with rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy using a PC-UAS. The cavity pressure parameters were set as follows: control value at -15 mmHg to -2 mmHg, warning value at 20 mmHg, and limit value at 30 mmHg. The infusion flow rate was set at 150-200 ml/min. A holmium laser (550 µm) was used to powderize the stone at 2.0-2.5 J/pulse with a frequency of 20-30 pulses/s. Analyses included cavity pressure, operative time, stone-free rates, and complications. RESULTS: Among the 31 patients, 29 were successfully treated with PC-UAS, with nine requiring adjunctive flexible ureteroscopy for stone migration to the kidney. Two procedures were converted to percutaneous nephrolithotomies due to failure of sheath placement. The cavity pressure of all 29 patients was well-maintained below 20 mmHg, with clear vision. The mean operative time was 48.2 ± 17.7 min. No complications, such as ureteral perforation, mucosal avulsion, or hemorrhage, occurred. Two cases of Clavien-Dindo grade I complications occurred. No major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II-V) occurred. The mean postoperative hospitalization time was 1.7 days. The stone-free rates 1 day and 1 month after surgery were 93.1% and 96.6%, respectively. One patient with residual stones underwent extracorporeal shockwaves. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with PC-UAS can effectively control the cavity pressure, shorten the operation time, and improve the efficiency of broken stones, thus reducing the complication rate.

Japanese survey of perioperative complications and ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in multicenter collaborative study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate perioperative complications and the details of postoperative ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (URS-L) for upper urinary tract stones in Japan. METHODS: Patient data on intra- and postoperative complications after ureteroscopy using URS-L were retrospectively collected from multiple centers in Japan between April 2017 and March 2020 with the cooperation of the Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics. Data included the number of patients undergoing URS-L, number and type of intra- and postoperative complications, and detailed characteristics of postoperative ureteral stricture. RESULTS: In total, 14 125 patients underwent URS-L over 3 years at 82 institutions. Annual URS-L numbers gradually increased from 4419 in 2017, to 4760 in 2018, and 4946 in 2019. The total complication rate was 10.5%, which was divided into intra-operative complications in 1.40% and postoperative complications in 9.18%. The annual incidences of intra- and postoperative complications were not significantly different from year to year (p = 0.314 and p = 0.112). Ureteral perforation, ureteral avulsion, and the intra-operative conversion rate were 1.35%, 0.03%, and 0.02%, respectively. Fever >38°C, septic shock, blood transfusion, and postoperative mortality were 7.44%, 0.81%, 0.07%, and 0.04%, respectively. Ureteral stricture occurred in 0.8% of cases. The median length of stricture site was 10.0 mm and the success rate of stricture treatment was 54.6%. CONCLUSION: Although URS-L utilization has increased in Japan, the annual complication rate has remained steady. Although URS-L is a useful and less invasive procedure, devastating complications can still occur.

[Efficacy and safety of flexible ureteral lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in patients aged 80 years and older].

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteral lithotripsy (FURL) for treating upper urinary tract calculi in patients ≥80 years. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 297 elderly patients who underwent FURL for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi at Beijing Hospital from January 2019 to September 2023. Patients were divided into elderly group (≥80 years) and low-middle aged group (≥60-<80 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match preoperative clinical data of patients. After PSM, the basic, perioperative and postoperative data of the two groups were compared. Results: After PSM, 116 patients were enrolled, including 58 patients in each group. The age [M (Q1, Q3)] of elderly group was 83.0 (81.0, 86.0) years, which included 29 males. The age of low-middle aged group was 69.5 (64.8, 74.0) years, which included 33 males. The duration of postoperative hospitalization [M (Q1, Q3)] in elderly group was longer than that in low-middle aged group [2 (1, 3) d vs 1 (1, 2) d, P=0.002]. Serious postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases in the elderly group and 1 case in the low-middle aged group, respectively, without surgical intervention. There was no significant statistical difference in stone-free rate (SFR) [79.3% (46/58) vs 84.5% (49/58)], operation time [M (Q1, Q3), 70.0 (48.3, 100.0) vs 65.0 (46.5, 101.2) min] and postoperative complication rate [25.9% (15/58) vs 22.4% (13/58)] between two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi in patients ≥80 years, the SFR, operation time and postoperative complication rate of FURL are comparable to those in low-middle aged elderly patients. FURL has good safety and effectiveness in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi in patients ≥80 years.

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pressure-measuring ureteral access sheath for large ureteral stones.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pressure-measuring ureteral access sheath (PM-UAS) for large ureteral stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 258 consecutive patients with large ureteral stones ≥15 mm was enrolled. They were treated by ureteroscopic lithotripsy with PM-UAS in the oblique supine lithotomy position. The technology can precisely monitor and automatically control cavity pressure. The cavity pressure control value was set at -15 mmHg∼-5 mmHg. The cavity pressure limit value was set at 30 mmHg. Infusion flow rate was set at 100-200 ml/min. Postoperative data such as stone-free rate and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: PM-UAS was successfully implanted in 225 patients at one stage. Eighteen cases of patients who had failed the first surgery were successfully treated with a second operation. Fifty-one cases with stones migrating up to the kidney were converted to flexible lithotripsy. The other 15 cases were converted to percutaneous nephrolithotomy due to significant ureteral stenosis. The operative time was 49.5 ± 11.2 min. The stone-free rates after one month and three months were 87.2% (212/243) and 94.2% (229/243), respectively. Complications from grade I to II were observed in 25(10.3%) patients. No other complications from grade III to V were noted. CONCLUSION: The ureteroscopic lithotripsy with PM-UAS is safe and efficacious for large ureteral stones.

[Comprehensive comparative assessment of the results of treatment of patients with ureteral stones using two different methods].

AIM: To improve treatment outcomes in patients with ureteral stones by optimizing the use of noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of 186 patients with ureteral stones who were treated at the "RSSPMCU" in the period from July 2020 to April 2023 was carried out. Among them, 84 were undergone to electromagnetic extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) using the Storz Modulith SLX-F2 device (Switzerland). A procedure was performed under ataralgesia. The mean stone size was 8.54+/-2.79 (4-16 mm). The average amount of shock waves per stone was 2436+/-247.78. The session duration was 19.37+/-1.86 minutes. Endoscopic procedures were performed in 102 patients. Among them, 49 stones were removed using the ureteroscopy (URS), while in 49 and 4 cases percutaneous access (PCNL) and a combination of PCNL and URS under spinal anesthesia were done, respectively. The mean stone size was 11.46+/-4.26 (5-26 mm). Holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripsy was performed. The duration of the procedure was 63.38+/-17.48 min. RESULTS: The stone density of patients undergoing ESWL was 855+/-319.84 HU, while those undergoing endoscopic procedures was 943.78+/-319.48 HU (p>0.05). The absorbed dose with ESWL was 18.73+/-4.15 mGy compared to 31.42+/-1.40 mGy for endoscopic procedures (p<0.001). A length of stay was 1.0+/-0.0 and 2.75+0.1, respectively (p<0.001). After 7-10 days, the stone free rate (SFR) was 76.2% (n=64) after ESWL and 99.02% (n=101) after endoscopic interventions (p<0.05). In the ESWL group, 3 patients received second session of ESWL for residual stones and in 9 cases URS was done. The SFR was 100% on day 45. In patients after endoscopic interventions, 1 patient underwent URS and SFR was 100% on the 15th day. CONCLUSION: In general, the endoscopic technique is superior to ESWL in patients with ureteral stones both in terms of SFR and duration of procedure, but is inferior in safety due to invasiveness and the absorbed dose. In our opinion, the key indication for endoscopic treatment should be stone size greater than 6 mm, density more than 1000 HU, and patient preference.

[Ureteral Access Sheath Assisted Percutaneous Antegrade Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Impacted Ureteral Calculus].

We retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ureteral access sheath-assisted percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treating ureteral calculus. Between January 2016 and April 2022, 28 patients with ureteral calculus received ureteral access sheath-assisted percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy. At postoperative 1 month, a plain computed tomography (CT) and kidney ureter bladder X-ray (KUB) were performed to assess stone fragmentation and hydronephrosis. According to postoperative imaging, stone-free was defined as residual fragments 4 mm or less on KUB and 2 mm or less on CT. The mean stone size was 16.3 mm (3-43 mm). The mean stone volume was 1.91 ml (0.13-6.1 ml). The mean operative time was 140 min (60-222 min). Stone-free rate (SFR) was 89.3% on KUB, and 82.1% on CT. Three patients (10.7%) had postoperative fever greater than 38.5°C. There were no complications of grade III or higher according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. In the Ellenbogen classification, improvement was observed in hydronephrosis of Grade II or lower. Improvement was also observed in cases with Grade III hydronephrosis. However, due to the presence of residual renal atrophy, there was no change in the classification. The preoperative eGFR was 63 ml/min/1.73 m² (36-101 ml/min/1.73 m²) and the postoperative eGFR was not improved. We conclude that ureteral access sheath-assisted percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy is effective for treating impacted ureteral calculus.

[Obstructive uropathia in pregnant women: results of treatment depending on the etiopatogenetic factor of development].

Actuality. The development of renal colic in pregnant women is one of the most common reasons for visiting a hospital that is not associated with obstetric pathology. Given the pharmacological and diagnostic limitations during gestation, the problem of expanding the renal cavitary system in pregnant women, as well as the choice of treatment tactics, remains a difficult clinical task. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group included 537 patients with obstructive uropathy with a gestation period of 5 to 36 weeks, who were hospitalized from January 2018 to January 2022 at the GBUZ GKB named after. S.S. Yudina DZM. Depending on the etiopathogenetic obstructive uropathy, the patients were divided into 3 groups: group I - 201 (37.4%) patients with gestational pyelonephritis (the presence of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and expansion of the renal cavitary system without confirming the diagnosis of urolithiasis; group II - 216 (40.2%) patients with renal colic (presence of pain without signs of a systemic inflammatory reaction) and enlargement of the renal cavitary system not associated with urolithiasis; group III - 120 (22.4%) pregnant women with an expansion of the cavitary system of the kidney caused by urolithiasis, both with and without signs of a systemic inflammatory reaction. Age, body mass index and previous number of pregnancies in all groups did not differ. The mean age of the patients in the three groups was 26.1 years, with a mean gestational age of 20.8 weeks. In 433 (80.6%) patients, pain was observed in the lumbar region on the right, in 83 (15.5%) - on the left, the bilateral nature of the process - in 21 (3.9%) patients. RESULTS: In group I, despite ongoing conservative therapy, 129 (64.2%) pregnant women received an internal ureteral stent. After 2-4 weeks of follow-up, the ureteral stent was removed in all patients. As a result, a short-term drainage method (up to 4 weeks) was effective in 90.1% of pregnant women, and in 13 (9.9%) patients, it was necessary to re-insert the stent, followed by a routine replacement of the drain every month. Considering the pain syndrome among patients of group II, drainage was performed in 80 (37%) pregnant women. Routine stent replacement was required in 2 (2.3%) patients. In group III, the location of the calculus in the pyelocaliceal system was in 28 (23.3%) patients, in the ureter - in 92 (76.7%) patients. Independent passage of the calculus was noted in 8 (6.7%) pregnant women, ureteroscopy without prior stenting was performed in 31 (25.8%) pregnant women with ureteral calculus. The remaining 81 (67.5%) pregnant women underwent stent placement at the first stage. When the stone was localized in the ureter, 32 (22.7%) patients underwent contact laser ureterolithotripsy and 21 (17.5%) patients underwent ureterolithoextraction. When a stone was located in the kidney, 28 (23.3%) pregnant women underwent pyelocalicolithotripsy. Achievement of the stone-free status was observed in 92.8%. CONCLUSION: Obstructive uropathy in pregnant women requires identification of the cause and a multidisciplinary approach. Long-term drainage of the urinary tract should be avoided and short-term drainage should be preferred. Surgical treatment of urolithiasis, regardless of gestational age, is an effective and safe method.

FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY AND LASER LITHOTRIPSY IN A PATIENT WITH A STONE IN THE TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY: A CASE REPORT.

We report a case of a 31-year-old patient with obstructive ureterolithiasis in a transplanted kidney, treated endoscopically with flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy. The patient presented with biochemical signs of acute renal failure and ultrasonographically detected hydronephrosis. Emergency nonenhanced computed tomography scan revealed an obstructive 5-mm stone in the ureter of the transplanted kidney with resulting hydronephrosis. The patient received a double J stent to relieve allograft obstruction. Since the stone size was deemed favorable for conservative treatment, the patient was discharged. Two months later, he was readmitted for leucopenia caused by mycophenolate mofetil. After recuperation of his white blood cell count, he was referred to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, but since the stone was radiolucent, an endoscopic procedure was indicated. Retrograde endoscopic flexible ureterorenoscopy with 'dusting' of the stone was successfully performed. One year after the procedure, the patient was stone free and with good allograft function.

Clinical Advances and Current Status in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi.

Ureteral calculi are a common urological disease with a consistently high incidence and an increasing trend each year. Ureteral calculi treatment is an essential and hot topic in the urology field and holds a vital status in the urological work system. Recently, with rapid advances in urology, there have been continuous updates and developments in treatment modalities, and many new methods and techniques have emerged and are being applied in clinical settings; This has effectively improved the clinical treatment outcomes of individuals with ureteral calculi. However, each treatment modality has its specific indications, and owing to the uneven distribution of medical resources and the effect of the patients' conditions and nature of the stones, standardization and randomness in selecting the treatment regimens for ureteral calculi are lacking. Therefore, selecting the diagnostic and therapeutic plan is vital for improving treatment efficacy. In this review, we summarize the findings of recent domestic and international studies to provide an outline of the progress and current status of ureteral calculi treatment from aspects such as pharmacotherapy, surgery, and minimally invasive treatment to provide a basis for treating this disease in clinical settings.