Postvaricocele Embolization Pain Syndrome: A Case Series Report and Review of Current Treatment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Orchialgia is not an uncommon complaint among men with varicocele, but postvaricocele embolization-related testicular pain has not been widely investigated. This study evaluates the phenomenon of postvaricocele embolization pain (PVEP) syndrome and examines the current strategies to treat this unusual complication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospectively collected database of patients with PVEP who presented to a tertiary center was analyzed between January 2011 and January 2020 following internal ethics approval. Patient demographics, including other complications related to embolization, analgesic requirements, and pain scores (on a 10-point visual analog score), treatment strategies, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and overall satisfaction score (on a 5-point scale), were reviewed. All patients were reviewed for a minimum of 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 20 men with a mean age of 33.8 (18-45) years old, presented with PVEP over 10 years. Most men received embolization on an average of 26.6 (18-48) months. The reasons for varicocele embolization include either isolated or combined orchialgia (15 men), subfertility (5 men), and cosmesis (6 men). Eighteen (90%) men underwent microscopic spermatic cord denervation (MSCD) and 2 patients elected for conservative measures. The average pain scores pre-MSCD and post-MSCD were 6.9 (4-9) and 1.4 (0-4) (p<0.001) with a significant reduction in analgesia requirements. Immediate improvement in pain score was reported in all the patients and this persisted at the 12 months review. Most men reported a high satisfaction score (of 4/5) and only one patient reported no change in symptoms after MSCD. CONCLUSION: PVEP is a unique complication and patients should be counseled on the potential risk of persistent orchialgia following embolization for varicocele. The MSCD appears to be an effective treatment option with high success and satisfaction rates.

AEC and AFMSC Transplantation Preserves Fertility of Experimentally Induced Rat Varicocele by Expressing Differential Regenerative Mechanisms.

Amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid derived cells are regarded as a promising stem cell source for developing regenerative medicine techniques, although they have never been tested on male infertility diseases such as varicocele (VAR). The current study aimed to examine the effects of two distinct cell sources, human Amniotic Fluid Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (hAFMSCs) and amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs), on male fertility outcomes in a rat induced VAR model. To explain cell-dependent enhancement of reproductive outcomes in rats transplanted with hAECs and hAFMSCs, insights on testis morphology, endocannabinoid system (ECS) expression and inflammatory tissue response have been carried out alongside cell homing assessment. Both cell types survived 120 days post-transplantation by modulating the ECS main components, promoting proregenerative M2 macrophages (Mφ) recruitment and a favorable anti-inflammatory IL10 expression pattern. Of note, hAECs resulted to be more effective in restoring rat fertility rate by enhancing both structural and immunoresponse mechanisms. Moreover, immunofluorescence analysis revealed that hAECs contributed to CYP11A1 expression after transplantation, whereas hAFMSCs moved towards the expression of Sertoli cell marker, SOX9, confirming a different contribution into the mechanisms leading to testis homeostasis. These findings highlight, for the first time, a distinct role of amniotic membrane and amniotic fluid derived cells in male reproduction, thus proposing innovative targeted stem-based regenerative medicine protocols for remedying high-prevalence male infertility conditions such as VAR.

[The application of acupuncture in varicocele infertility based on " Visceral Collateral " theory].

The occurrence of varicocele infertility can be attributed to the small and flexural spermatic plexus which constitutes the main structure of spermatic cord.Obstruction of blood circulation, stagnation of qi and blood, ultimately leading to infertility. The spermatic plexus ' physiological and pathological symptoms are consistent with the theory of visceral collateral. Based on the theory of visceral collaterals, the varicocele infertility caused by stagnation of liver collateral and deficiency of kidney collateral. And the acupuncture is used to directly act on the relevant points on the meridians, so as to dredge the meridians, strengthen the healthy and expel the evil, and harmonize the yin and yang of visceral, which is more in line with the therapeutic principle of " unblocking the meridians " for collateral diseases. For varicocele infertility caused by liver meridian stasis, it can regulate the liver meridian Chong Ren, eliminate blood stasis and promote stagnation, and be combined with LR3, LI4, GB34, SP6, CV3. For varicocele infertility caused by kidney deficiency and meridian syndrome, it can tonify the kidney meridian Du Yang, warm and disperse the essence, and mainly focus on GV4, CV4, KI3, BL23 and BL43.

Revisiting the impact of varicocele and its treatments on male fertility.

Varicocele is one of the most common, yet treatable, causes of male infertility. Varicoceles are present in more than 40% of infertile men with primary infertility, a figure that increases with age. Varicoceles impair semen parameters and sperm DNA and are linked with lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Until recently, men had seldom been examined in male fertility workups. This is changing as urologists have become recognized as team members in infertility. Hence identification and treatment are available as never before. Furthermore, as men become aware that they are as likely as their female partners to be infertile, they want equal 'couple care', requesting urological referrals as they realize that they can improve their semen quality and chances of fatherhood without or before fertility treatment. There is now a greater understanding of the mechanisms of varicocele-induced damage by oxidative stress, using sperm DNA as a sensitive biomarker of sperm quality. There is a current consensus that varicocele is linked to poor semen and repair improves semen and sperm DNA quality. Evidence is strengthening to indicate that varicocele repair increases pregnancy and live birth rates in natural conception and following fertility treatment.

[Pricking-reinforcing -reducing therapy improves semen quality and seminal plasma biochemical indexes in patients with varicocele infertility].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pricking-reinforcing -reducing therapy (PRRT) on the semen quality and seminal plasma biochemical indexes of varicocele (VC) infertility patients. METHODS: We randomly and equally assigned 160 patients with VC infertility into a PRRT and a control group, the former treated by PRRT and the latter with oral ShengjingCapsules. Before and after treatment, we obtained the semen parameters, sperm morphology, sperm survival rate, sperm acrosin activity, seminal plasma neutral α glucosidase and seminal plasma zinc in the patients and compared them between the two groups. RESULTS: Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the PRRT and control groups in sperm concentration (ï¼»16.81 ± 7.83ï¼½ vs ï¼»16.80 ± 7.54ï¼½ ×106 /ml, P > 0.05), total sperm count (ï¼»42.01 ± 19.57ï¼½ vs ï¼»41.99 ± 18.84ï¼½ ×106, P > 0.05), percentages of progressively motile sperm (PMS) (ï¼»15.37 ± 11.03ï¼½% vs ï¼»14.68 ± 10.27ï¼½%, P > 0.05) and morphologically normal sperm ( MNS) (1.62 ± 1.51ï¼½% vs ï¼»1.62 ± 1.13ï¼½%, P > 0.05), sperm survival rate (ï¼»28.11 ± 18.95ï¼½% vs ï¼»28.23±18.38ï¼½%, P > 0.05) and sperm acrosin activity (ï¼»28.11 ± 14.64ï¼½ vs ï¼»27.19 ± 14.07ï¼½ U/L, P > 0.05). After three months of treatment, all the patients showed evident increases in the above parameters (P < 0.05), even higher in the PRRT than in the control group, more significantly in sperm concentration (ï¼»38.88 ± 30.54ï¼½ vs ï¼»25.60 ± 14.71ï¼½ ×106 /ml, P < 0.05), PMS (ï¼»32.60 ± 12.46ï¼½% vs ï¼»27.67 ± 12.27ï¼½%, P < 0.05) and sperm acrosin activity (ï¼»65.74±31.81ï¼½ vs ï¼»67.94±17.95ï¼½ U/L, P < 0.05), though not significantly in total sperm count (97.20 ± 76.35ï¼½ vs ï¼»88.19 ± 39.56ï¼½ ×106, P > 0.05), MNS (ï¼»2.35 ± 1.83ï¼½% vs ï¼»1.87 ± 1.20ï¼½%, P > 0.05) and sperm survival rate (ï¼»61.44 ± 20.02ï¼½% vs ï¼»59.12 ± 22.48ï¼½%, P > 0.05). Compared with the baseline, after treatment, the patients in the PRRT group also exhibited elevated levels of neutral α-glucosidase (ï¼»14.42 ± 5.90ï¼½ vs ï¼»28.43 ± 19.76ï¼½ U/L, P < 0.05) and seminal plasma zinc (ï¼»2.11 ± 1.22ï¼½ vs ï¼»2.89 ± 1.23ï¼½ mmol/L, P < 0.05), and so did the controls (ï¼»14.44 ± 5.61ï¼½ vs ï¼»26.66 ± 17.69ï¼½ U/L , P < 0.05) and (ï¼»2.09 ± 1.10ï¼½ vs ï¼»2.82±1.08ï¼½ mmol/L, P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference, however, was observed between the two groups after treatment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PRRT can significantly improve semen quality in patients with VC infertility, even more effective than ShengjingCapsules in improving sperm concentration, PMS, sperm survival rate, and sperm acrosin activity, which may be related to its effect of elevating the levels of seminal plasma neutral-α glucosidase and zinc providing sufficient energy for basic sperm metabolism, maturation, energy acquisition and motility.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline PART II.

PURPOSE: The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline. Part II outlines the appropriate management of the male in an infertile couple. Medical therapies, surgical techniques, as well as use of intrauterine insemination (IUI)/in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are covered to allow for optimal patient management. Please refer to Part I for discussion on evaluation of the infertile male and discussion of relevant health conditions that are associated with male infertility. MATERIALS/METHODS: The Emergency Care Research Institute Evidence-based Practice Center team searched PubMed®, Embase®, and Medline from January 2000 through May 2019. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). This summary is being simultaneously published in Fertility and Sterility and The Journal of Urology. RESULTS: This Guideline provides updated, evidence-based recommendations regarding management of male infertility. Such recommendations are summarized in the associated algorithm (figure[Figure: see text]). CONCLUSION: Male contributions to infertility are prevalent, and specific treatment as well as assisted reproductive techniques are effective at managing male infertility. This document will undergo additional literature reviews and updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand.

Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

BACKGROUND: Varicoceles are associated with male subfertility; however, the mechanisms by which varicoceles affect fertility have yet to be satisfactorily explained. Several treatment options exist, including surgical or radiological treatment, however the safest and most efficient treatment remains unclear.  OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of surgical and radiological treatment of varicoceles on live birth rate, adverse events, pregnancy rate, varicocele recurrence, and quality of life amongst couples where the adult male has a varicocele, and the female partner of childbearing age has no fertility problems. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases on 4 April 2020: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We also searched the trial registries and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) if they were relevant to the clinical question posed and compared different forms of surgical ligation, different forms of radiological treatments, surgical treatment compared to radiological treatment, or one of these aforementioned treatment forms compared to non-surgical methods, delayed treatment, or no treatment. We extracted data if the studies reported on live birth, adverse events, pregnancy, varicocele recurrence, and quality of life. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening of abstracts and full-text publications, alongside data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment, were done dually using the Covidence software. When we had sufficient data, we calculated random-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) meta-analyses; otherwise, we reported results narratively. We used the I2 statistic to analyse statistical heterogeneity. We planned to use funnel plots to assess publication bias in meta-analyses with at least 10 included studies. We dually rated the risk of bias of studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 1897 citations after de-duplicating the search results. We excluded 1773 during title and abstract screening. From the 113 new full texts assessed in addition to the 10 studies (11 references) included in the previous version of this review, we included 38 new studies, resulting in a total of 48 studies (59 references) in the review providing data for 5384 participants. Two studies (three references) are ongoing studies and two studies are awaiting classification. Treatment versus non-surgical, non-radiological, delayed, or no treatment Two studies comparing surgical or radiological treatment versus no treatment reported on live birth with differing directions of effect. As a result, we are uncertain whether surgical or radiological treatment improves live birth rates when compared to no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 26.93; 2 RCTs, N = 204; I2 = 74%, very low-certainty evidence). Treatment may improve pregnancy rates compared to delayed or no treatment (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.26; 13 RCTs, N = 1193; I2 = 65%, low-certainty evidence). This suggests that couples with no or delayed treatment have a 21% chance of pregnancy, whilst the pregnancy rate after surgical or radiological treatment is between 22% and 48%. We identified no evidence on adverse events, varicocele recurrence, or quality of life for this comparison. Surgical versus radiological treatment We are uncertain about the effect of surgical versus radiological treatment on live birth and on the following adverse events: hydrocele formation, pain, epididymitis, haematoma, and suture granuloma. We are uncertain about the effect of surgical versus radiological treatment on pregnancy rate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.70; 5 RCTs, N = 456, low-certainty evidence) and varicocele recurrence (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.08; 3 RCTs, N = 380, low-certainty evidence). We identified no evidence on quality of life for this comparison. Surgery versus other surgical treatment We identified 19 studies comparing microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment to any other surgical treatment. Microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment probably improves pregnancy rates slightly compared to other surgical treatments (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; 12 RCTs, N = 1473, moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that couples with microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment have a 10% to 14% chance of pregnancy after treatment, whilst the pregnancy rate in couples after other surgical treatments is 10%. This procedure also probably reduces the risk of varicocele recurrence (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29, 0.79; 14 RCTs, N = 1565, moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that 0.4% to 1.1% of men undergoing microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment experience recurrent varicocele, whilst 1.4% of men undergoing other surgical treatments do. Results for the following adverse events were inconclusive: hydrocele formation, haematoma, abdominal distension, testicular atrophy, wound infection, scrotal pain, and oedema. We identified no evidence on live birth or quality of life for this comparison. Nine studies compared open inguinal surgical treatment to retroperitoneal surgical treatment. Due to small sample sizes and methodological limitations, we identified neither treatment type as superior or inferior to the other regarding adverse events, pregnancy rates, or varicocele recurrence. We identified no evidence on live birth or quality of life for this comparison. Radiological versus other radiological treatment One study compared two types of radiological treatment (sclerotherapy versus embolisation) and reported 13% varicocele recurrence in both groups. Due to the broad confidence interval, no valid conclusion could be drawn (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.16 to 6.20; 1 RCT, N = 30, very low-certainty evidence). We identified no evidence on live birth, adverse events, pregnancy, or quality of life for this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited evidence, it remains uncertain whether any treatment (surgical or radiological) compared to no treatment in subfertile men may be of benefit on live birth rates; however, treatment may improve the chances for pregnancy. The evidence was also insufficient to determine whether surgical treatment was superior to radiological treatment. However, microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment probably improves pregnancy rates and reduces the risk of varicocele recurrence compared to other surgical treatments. High-quality, head-to-head comparative RCTs focusing on live birth rate and also assessing adverse events and quality of life are warranted.

[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of Varicocele]. / Recommandations du Comité d'Andrologie et de Médecine Sexuelle de l'AFU concernant la prise en charge de la Varicocèle.

The diagnosis of varicocele is clinical, carried out in supine and standing position and in Valsalva maneuver. Only clinical varicoceles have to be treated. A scrotal ultrasound with Doppler is generally performed as part of the infertile man's evaluation or in case of examination difficulties. The main indication for varicocele treatment is the adult man with clinical varicocele and abnormalities of sperm parameters, in a context of infertility of couple, with a partner having a satisfactory ovarian reserve and no cause of female infertility or a curable infertility cause. The decision to treat varicocele must therefore be taken after evaluation of the two partners of the couple. Adults with symptomatic varicocele and those with spermogram abnormalities may also be offered a cure for their varicocele even in the absence of a paternity plan, as well as adolescents with reduced testicular growth, an ipsilateral decrease testicular volume, or a size gradient between the 2 testes. The cure of varicocele can be carried out by surgery or by percutaneous embolization. Microsurgery (inguinal or subinguinal) offers lower rates of recurrence and complications than high surgical approaches (laparoscopic or not) and surgeries without magnification. It is therefore the reference surgical technique. Percutaneous retrograde embolization is a minimally invasive alternative to microsurgery offering satisfactory outcomes with rare and often benign complications. The cure for varicocele results in an improvement in sperm parameters and recent data seem to confirm that it increases the natural pregnancy rate. These results appear after a delay of 3 to 9 months (at least 1 to 2 cycles of spermatogenesis). When the sperm involvement was severe (azoospermia, severe oligospermia), the improvement of the spermogram allow (1) to avoid surgery testicular sperm extraction or (2) perform intrauterine insemination rather than ICSI.

Analysis of internal spermatic vein embolization through catheter versus laparoscopic high ligation in treatment of left varicocele.

OBJECTIVE: Varicocele is a common disease in young and middle-aged men. This study aims to compare the efficacy of internal spermatic vein embolization of left varicocele versus laparoscopic high ligation. METHODS: From January 2017 to September 2018, a total of 69 varicocele patients were admitted and given the opportunity to choose the treatment option. Among these, 26 patients were treated with sclerosing agent injection, while 43 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. They were followed up for 12 months after surgery, and the technical success rate, recurrence rate, complication rate, cost, operative time, and hospitalization time with regard to these two methods were analyzed. RESULTS: All patients completed the medical procedures. There was no recurrence in patients in the sclerotherapy group during the follow-up period; however, the complication rate was 19.2%. Furthermore, the operative time, hospitalization time, and cost of treatment were 31.1 ± 11.1 min, 1.2 ± 0.49 days, and 9613.11 ± 895.97 Yuan, respectively. In the laparoscopic group, 9 patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral high ligation, while 34 patients received treatment on the left side alone. The recurrence rate of left varicocele was 4.7% and the complication rate was 44.2%. Furthermore, the operative time, hospitalization time, and treatment cost were 50.4 ± 14.48 min, 4.0 ± 2.02 days, and 10,948.29 ± 2547.00 Yuan, respectively. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in operative time, hospitalization time, and treatment cost. Patients in the sclerotherapy group had an advantage with respect to the overall complication rate when compared with patients from the laparoscopic group (X2 = 4.448, P < 0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in hydrocele (X2 = 4.555, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between these two groups (X2 = 1.245, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent sclerotherapy showed a higher technical success rate, a lower recurrence rate, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization time compared to those treated with laparoscopic ligation. Transcatheter sclerosing agent injection may be a preferable treatment option for patients with unilateral varicocele.

[Favorable impact of left antegrade sclerotherapy of clinical left varicocele on spermogram]. / Impact de la sclérothérapie antégrade de varicocèle gauche clinique sur le spermogramme.

OBJECTIVES: Study the early postoperative course of sperm parameters after antegrade sclerotherapy (AS) of clinical left varicocele (CLV) in men consulting for infertility with sperm disruption, and to validate the efficacy and safety of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective observational study of men with CLV, consultant in medically assisted procreation center for primary or secondary infertility of the couple. All patients were operated by SA via scrotal approach. After clinical and ultrasound checks at 6 weeks, a control spermogram was performed at 3-6 months of surgery. The following parameters were analyzed: sperm count, motility, percent of normal form, and total number of motile sperm ("total motile sperm count" [TMSC]). RESULTS: The study involved 138 men (median age 33 years) with sperm alteration. All patients benefited from AS of their CLV. No Clavian complication > 1 was observed. Postoperative control demonstrated a significant improvement in all spermogram parameters, with a median progression of 40% of the count (55 vs 32×106), 80% of the concentration (20.3 vs 11.1×106/ml), 30% of the motility (34.7% vs 26.5%), 60% of the normal form percentage (4.0 vs 2.5%) and the 75% TMSC (41.5 vs 23%), 7×106) (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SA is an effective and safe technique for treating CLV and improving sperm parameters fertility indicators. Our results suggest that this treatment may be recommended to infertile men with CLV in the management of infertility of the couple. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Intravascular Ultrasound for Evaluation of Left Gonadal Vein Anatomic Variations During Coil Embolization.

We illustrate the intravascular ultrasound (US) findings in the evaluation of left gonadal vein anatomic variations. During a 2-year period, 4 consecutive patients (mean age, 37 years; range, 28-45 years) with left-sided varicocele underwent embolization. Intravascular US examinations and retrograde venography were performed to assess varicocele anatomy. Anatomic variants were recorded and categorized. A comparison between intravascular US and fluoroscopic findings was performed. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis (P < .05). Technical success was achieved in all cases. There was a statistically significant difference in the maximum gonadal vein diameter between venography and intravascular US (P = .0087). Intravascular US showed left gonadal vein anatomic variations and better ability in the evaluation of the vein diameter.

Early varicocelectomy by percutaneous scleroembolization improves seminiferous tubules spermatozoa release in the adolescent phase of testicular growth.

Varicocele is a rather common andrological condition in adolescents, which can adversely affect testicular growth and seminal parameters, leading to infertility in about 20% of adults. The aim of this study was to investigate if treating varicocele before the age of 18 is a beneficial option to improve testicular hypotrophy and seminal parameters and if minimally invasive techniques could be an appropriate treatment choice for adolescent varicocele associated with spermatic vein reflux. A percutaneous scleroembolization was performed in sixty-four consecutive young patients (13-19 years old) with left varicocele, preceded by a fluoroscopy. In thirty-four of them, semen samples were also collected. We examined semen samples and testicles dimensions before and after percutaneous varicocelectomy, compared to a nonoperated control group, with a six-month follow-up. Total sperm count and sperm morphology were significantly increased in the intervention group. Left testicular volume significantly increased in both groups, while only correction of varicocele improved spermatozoa release per unit of testis volume. We conclude that early varicocelectomy by percutaneous scleroembolization significantly ameliorates seminiferous tubules activity in the critical adolescent phase of testicular growth. It is suggested that adolescents should be; offered varicocele repair as soon as possible in order to improve reproductive potential.

Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization.

INTRODUCTION: Varicocele is a relatively complex pathology that affects the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Modern treatment involves both urological/surgical and interventional procedures. Our objective is to compare outcomes of conventional laparoscopic ligation (LL) and occluding balloon embolization (OBE) a percutaneous interventional procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months' follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15-45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher's test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient's postoperative recovery time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative. CONCLUSION: Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.

One-carbon cycle support rescues sperm damage in experimentally induced varicocoele in rats.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether micronutrients in support of the one-carbon cycle and glutathione synthesis are effective in improving sperm damage after surgical varicocoele induction in rats and whether any effect is achieved without a rebound reductive stress as seen with oral antioxidants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical varicocoele was induced in adult male Wistar rats and resulted in significant damage to the testis and sperm cells measured at 2 and 4 months after surgery. At 2 months after surgery, rats received a 2-month oral supplementation in support of the one-carbon cycle containing B vitamins (B2, B3, B6, folic acid and B12), N-acetyl-cysteine, zinc, small amounts of vitamin E, and a natural source of betalains and quercetine (Condensyl® ; Parthenogen SAGL, Lugano, Switzerland and Nurilia SARL, Lyon, France). RESULTS: One-carbon cycle supplementation, compared to untreated controls, significantly improved the morphometric characteristics of testis (P < 0.05), sperm concentration, motility and abnormal morphology (P < 0.001), sperm chromatin condensation (aniline blue staining, P < 0.05), sperm DNA damage (acridine orange staining, P < 0.05) and sperm lipid peroxidation (BODIPY C11, P < 0.001). The improvement in both nuclear condensation and DNA damage and the lack of excessive inhibition of lipid peroxidation confirmed that no reductive stress had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Micronutrients in support of the one-carbon cycle are effective in the treatment of surgically induced varicocoele in rats, probably by activating natural antioxidant defences and epigenetics. These results support the idea that essential micronutrients including B vitamins may also have a positive influence in clinical varicocoele, which should be tested in prospective clinical trials.

Reproductive hormones and sperm parameters after varicocele repair: An observational study.

Varicocele repair (VR) is associated with improved sperm parameters in subfertile patients. We examined the association of the levels of reproductive hormones, scrotal colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and seminal parameters in subfertile men, before and after VR. Fifty subfertile males, with left-side varicocele, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The serum levels of FSH, LH and total testosterone (TT), along with continuous left spermatic venous reflux (SVR) and testicular volumes at CDU were evaluated, before and six months after VR by a left-side retrograde internal spermatic vein sclero-embolisation (SVE). Left-side SVR was either no longer present or significantly reduced in all patients after VR (p < 0.0001). Sperm parameters, in particular, the total sperm motile count (TMC), were found significantly improved after VR (p < 0.0001). Post-VR, no differences were observed in the baseline values of the reproductive hormones. Only SVR change was seen to predict TMC change (p = 0.026) in the univariate analysis, while reproductive hormones change had no effect on TMC change (FSH:p = 0.85;LH:p = 0.44;TT:p = 0.76). In conclusion, the improved sperm parameters were associated with the disappearance or reduction in SVR and not with changes in the levels of reproductive hormones after SVE. Thus, SVR change at CDU was the only predictor of improved sperm quality after VR in subfertile males.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Long-term follow-up of prostate volume reduction after sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic veins.

The purpose was to examine the results of bilateral percutaneous sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic veins on prostate volume and prostatic symptoms. We previously showed that destruction of one-way valves in the internal spermatic veins (varicocele) elevates hydrostatic pressure in the vertical testicular venous drainage system in the erect human. This diverts free testosterone (FT) flow at high concentrations directly from the testes into the prostate. High intraprostatic FT prolongs prostate cell life and increases cell proliferation rate-synergistic effects resulting in increased cell population (BPH). Treatment by interventional radiology (or microsurgery) techniques eliminates this diversion of FT flow to the prostate and reverses these pathologic processes. A total of 206 BPH patients with varicocele underwent bilateral sclerotherapy of the ISV. Of these, 81.5% exhibited significantly reduced prostate volume and improvement in prostatic symptoms (measured by IPSS scores) during follow-up period of 12 to over 24 months. 8% went on to require surgery despite mild post-treatment improvement (TURP). The use of prostate medications along with the treatment may have a combined positive effect. Very large prostate volume and large residual volume may limit degree of improvement. It is concluded that effective treatment of varicocele restores normal supply of testosterone to the prostate solely via its arterial supply, resulting in significant decrease of prostate volume and prostatic symptoms. The procedure is safe with only minor transient side effects.

Ischemic colitis following left antegrade sclerotherapy for idiopathic varicocele.

The Tauber procedure, i.e., antegrade sclerotherapy for varicocele, can lead to ischemic colitis. The pathogenesis can involve an atypical systemic-portal communication, which could represent an infrequently reported (rare) anatomical variant. The aim of this study is to review clinical cases from the literature to highlight the anatomical bases of such complications. A computer-aided and hand-checked review of the literature was used to identify relevant publications. Also, the computed tomography (CT) examination of a clinical case with medico-legal implications due to severe vascular complication following Tauber's procedure was reviewed. Although specific references to this complication have appeared since the 19th century, reports in the contemporary literature include only a few clinical cases of ischemic colitis following Tauber's procedure. The CT scan images of a filed lawsuit revealed traces suggesting a significant communication between the testicular and left colic veins, forming part of the systemic-portal anastomoses. An anatomical variation consisting of a communication between the testicular and left colic veins has been described from the clinical point of view, corresponding to a significant anatomical finding identified in the past that has been under-reported and its clinical importance subsequently underestimated. For the first time we have demonstrated its pathophysiological significance in a real clinical scenario, linking the anatomical variation to the clinical complication. This demonstrates the importance of raising scientific awareness on this issue to prevent possibly devastating complications in daily clinical practice. Clin. Anat. 31:774-781, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Therapeutic strategies for male infertility with varicocele].

The therapeutic decision for male infertility with varicocele is difficult and controversial, which requires the consideration of the patient's purpose of seeking medical help. The treatment of this condition involves not only surgery, but also medication and assisted reproductive technique (ART), and synergetic effects can be achieved by combination of the three options. In making a therapeutic decision, all related factors should be taken into full consideration.

Determination of spermatic vein reflux after varicocele repair helps to define the efficacy of treatment in improving sperm parameters of subfertile men.

PURPOSE: A continuous spermatic venous reflux (SVR) at colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) is an evidence for varicocele, a frequent correlate for male subfertility. We explored whether SVR after left varicocele repair is predictive for changes in semen quality in subfertile men. METHODS: Blood hormones (FSH, LH, and total testosterone) and scrotal CDU were obtained in subfertile patients with left grade II or grade III varicocele on physical evaluation and a poor sperm quality. Semen analysis and CDU were re-evaluated 6 months after a retrograde internal spermatic vein scleroembolisation. RESULTS: The retrospective study included 100 men with a baseline SVR >3 cm/s; 60 men showed a disappearance (group 1) and 40 men (group 2) showed a reduced SVR after varicocele repair. Total motile sperm count (TMC) was markedly increased after treatment (p < 0.0001; F = 35.79) and the increase was more relevant in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.04; F = 4.20). TMC and left SVR values after varicocele repair were negatively correlated (R = -0.218; p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that adjusted SVR after repair negatively predicted TMC change (TMC after repair minus baseline TMC) (ß = -2.56; p = 0.022). Disappearance of a continuous left SVR at CDU after varicocele repair was associated to a better improvement of semen parameters in subfertile men. CONCLUSION: Recording of a continuous left spermatic vein reflux is an objective method to assess a successful varicocele repair aimed to improve sperm parameters in subfertile men.

Left-Sided Varicocele as a Rare Presentation of May-Thurner Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS), the clinical sequelae of left iliac vein compression between the right iliac artery and the spine, is an accepted cause of lower extremity edema and venous thromboembolism. It is more prevalent in younger women and typically presents with left lower extremity symptoms. Atypical presentations such as right-sided symptoms, chronic pelvic pain, and even fatal venous rupture have been reported. Here, we describe iliac vein compression presenting as a chronic left-sided testicular varicocele. METHODS: A 22-year-old man presented with left testicular varicocele, scrotal edema, and pain after failing multiple attempts at surgical repair. MRI revealed left iliac vein compression and marked cross-pelvic collaterals. Venography and intravascular ultrasound confirmed left common iliac vein compression and typical changes of MTS. There was no gonadal vein (GV) reflux. An iliac vein stent (WALLSTENT, Boston Scientific) was placed. RESULTS: A good technical result was achieved, with elimination of internal iliac vein reflux and marked reduction in pelvic collateral flow (see image). The patient reported resolution of his symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Varicocele is a leading cause of testosterone insufficiency and infertility in young males. In the majority of cases, successful treatment can be achieved by addressing reflux in the internal spermatic vein (ISV) and/or GV by a variety of surgical or endovascular approaches. In unusual cases, the culprit pathology may be reflux in the vein of the vas deferens, which unlike the ISV and GV, drains into the internal iliac vein. In such cases, iliac vein compression usually associated with MTS may result in varicocele. To our knowledge, this is the first report of refractory varicocele secondary to iliac vein compression successfully treated with endovenous stenting.