Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock.

PURPOSE: To assess long-term outcomes of restrictive versus standard intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock included in the European Conservative versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy in Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial. METHODS: We conducted the pre-planned analyses of mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L index values and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS), and cognitive function using Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini MoCA) test at 1 year. Deceased patients were assigned numerical zero for HRQoL as a state equal to death and zero for cognitive function outcomes as worst possible score, and we used multiple imputation for missing data on HRQoL and cognitive function. RESULTS: Among 1554 randomized patients, we obtained 1-year data on mortality in 97.9% of patients, HRQoL in 91.3%, and cognitive function in 86.3%. One-year mortality was 385/746 (51.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group versus 383/767 (49.9%) in the standard-fluid group, absolute risk difference 1.5%-points [99% confidence interval (CI) - 4.8 to 7.8]. Mean differences were 0.00 (99% CI - 0.06 to 0.05) for EQ-5D-5L index values, - 0.65 for EQ VAS (- 5.40 to 4.08), and - 0.14 for Mini MoCA (- 1.59 to 1.14) for the restrictive-fluid group versus the standard-fluid group. The results for survivors only were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adult ICU patients with septic shock, restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy resulted in similar survival, HRQoL, and cognitive function at 1 year, but clinically important differences could not be ruled out.

Apical myocardial stunning in a large size porcine model assessed by strain and strain rate echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Warm ischemia and subsequent reperfusion of the heart can induce a temporary dysfunction known as myocardial stunning. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) to quantify longitudinal myocardial stunning close to the apex, and perform a comparison with sonomicrometry using a well-established large size porcine model. METHODS: In anesthetized pigs, postischemic myocardial stunning was induced by occluding LAD for 15 min followed by 90 min reperfusion (n = 7). Long-axis strain and strain rate was quantified by both TDI and sonomicrometry. RESULTS: During reperfusion, peak systolic strain measured by TDI decreased from -11.2% (+/-3.0) at baseline to -4.9% (+/-3.6), -3.4% (+/-2.9), and -4.3% (+/-5.0) at 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively (all P < 0.007). Postsystolic strain increased from -1.3% (+/-1.6) at baseline to -6.4% (+/-4.4), -4.8% (+/-4.0), and -5.2% (+/-2.7) by TDI in the reperfusion phase (all P < 0.048 except at 60 min of reperfusion (P = 0.081)). Postsystolic index increased from 0.10 (+/-0.13) at baseline to 0.56 (+/-0.24), 0.54 (+/-0.30), and 0.64 (+/-0.37) subsequently (all P < 0.012). [Correction added after online publication 30-May-2007: In the preceding sentence, the phrase 'Postsystolic index decreased from 0.10 (+/-0.13)' was changed to 'Postsystolic index increased from 0.10 (+/-0.13).'] Difference-mean and line of identity plots did not disclose any systematic error, but revealed substantial variation, indicating a mismatch between TDI and sonomicrometry. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to quantify postischemic myocardial stunning by TDI in a large size porcine model using longitudinal postsystolic shortening, and postsystolic index as indicators. TDI and sonomicrometry data reach the same end point, but the two techniques are not interchangeable when investigating myocardial stunning close to apex in reference to longitudinal strain and strain rate.