Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Vasc ; 45(6S): 6S24-6S30, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: - The management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is particularly challenging in patients with cancer who undergo complex treatment protocols. Cancer patients often have comorbidities which may affect the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatments. Coordinated multidisciplinary management of these complex cases can help optimize delivery of individualized anticoagulant treatment. AIMS: - To describe the multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) for the management of VTE in cancer patients at our institution and to document outcomes in these patients. METHODS: - Bi-monthly MDTMs attended by different physicians and nurses were established at Saint-Louis Hospital in 2008. We performed a retrospective analysis of all cases discussed between September 2008 and January 2018. RESULTS: - Over a 10-year period, 520 patients were discussed a total of 551 times. Their mean age was 63 years with 278 (53%) women. The most frequent primary cancer sites were breast (23%), genitourinary (21 %), hematological (20%), digestive (15%), and lung (9%). Fifty-two percent of patients had metastatic cancer, and 54% of them were receiving chemotherapy. The optimal treatment for pulmonary embolism (17%), deep vein thrombosis (16%), catheter-related thrombosis (20%) or combined events (46%) was discussed. Twenty-three patients (4.4%) were discussed for one VTE recurrence and 4 (0.8%) for 2 recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: - A dedicated MDTM for the management of VTE in cancer patients allows to discuss a wide range of clinical scenarios and contributes to optimal adherence to evidence-based clinical practices guidelines. The MDTM evaluation was successfully carried out within a short time-frame of VTE diagnosis and helped optimize individualized treatment plans.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Hospitales Públicos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Paris/epidemiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología
2.
J Med Vasc ; 45(6S): 6S31-6S38, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276942

RESUMEN

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients after tumor progression. The treatment of CAT is challenging because of a high risk of VTE recurrence, a high risk of bleeding, common presence of comorbidities, poly-medication, and potential drug-drug interactions (DDI). Since 2018, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a promising therapeutic alternative and have been recently included into the 2019 update of the International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC-CME) clinical practice guidelines for management of CAT. However, pharmacokinetic studies suggest that concomitant treatment with P-gp or CYP3A4 inhibitors will result in an increased exposure to rivaroxaban and apixaban, but the clinical relevance of these studies is unknown. In addition, there is an important inter-individual variability in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination, even more in cancer patients. Overall, the risk of pharmacokinetic DDI should be estimated based on several individual (patient age, renal and liver function, number of comedications) and diseases-related factors, including inflammation, sarcopenia, and low body weight. In this context, DDI with clinical implications could be expected with anti-neoplastic agents or supportive care treatments, especially with drugs known to be moderate or strong inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4 and P-gp. Consequently, in the presence of potential DDIs through CYP3A4, and/or P-gp, LMWHs remain the first-line anticoagulant of choice for the long-term treatment of CAT. Multidisciplinary consultation meetings and therapeutic patient education should be emphasized in the complex management of CAT.


Asunto(s)
Interacciones Farmacológicas , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/farmacocinética , Humanos , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Polifarmacia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA