The risk and predictors of mortality in octogenarians undergoing emergency laparotomy: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the risk of postoperative mortality in octogenarians undergoing emergency laparotomy. METHODS: In compliance with STROCSS guideline for observational studies, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study. All consecutive patients aged over 80 with acute abdominal pathology requiring emergency laparotomy between April 2014 and August 2019 were considered eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality, and the secondary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality. Statistical analyses included simple descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression analyses, and Kaplan-Meier survival statistics. RESULTS: A total of 523 octogenarians were eligible for inclusion. Emergency laparotomy in octogenarians was associated with 21.8% (95% CI 18.3-25.6%) 30-day postoperative mortality, 22.6% (95% CI 19.0-26.4%) in-hospital mortality, and 40.2% (95% CI 35.9-44.5%) 1-year mortality. Binary logistic regression analysis identified ASA status (OR, 2.49; 95% CI 1.82-3.38, P < 0.0001) and peritoneal contamination (OR, 2.00; 95% CI 1.30-3.08, P = 0.002) as predictors of 30-day postoperative mortality. The ASA status (OR, 1.92; 95% CI 1.50-2.46, P < 0.0001), peritoneal contamination (OR, 1.57; 95% CI 1.07-2.48, P = 0.020), and presence of malignancy (OR, 2.06; 95% CI 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001) were predictors of 1-year mortality. Log-rank test showed significant difference in postoperative survival rates among patients with different ASA status (P < 0.0001) and between patients with and without peritoneal contamination (P = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency laparotomies in patients older than 80 years with ASA status more than 3 in the presence of peritoneal contamination carry a high risk of immediate postoperative and 1-year mortality. This should be taken into account in communications with patients and their relatives, consent process, and multidisciplinary decision-making process for operative or non-operative management of such patients.

Closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The comparative evidence regarding the outcomes of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is poorly understood. We aimed to compare the outcomes of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in LRYGB for morbid obesity. METHODS: We conducted a search of electronic information sources to identify all comparative studies investigating the outcomes of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in patients undergoing LRYGB for morbid obesity. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool to assess the risk of bias of RCTs and observational studies, respectively. Random or fixed effects modelling was applied as appropriate. RESULTS: We included 10,031 patients from six observational studies and 2609 patients from two RCTs. Analysis of observational studies showed closure defects resulted in lower risks of internal hernia (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15, 0.54) and reoperation for small bowel obstruction (SBO) (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10, 0.83); no difference was found between the two groups in terms of SBO not related to internal hernia (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.47, 2.99), early SBO (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.04, 14.38), anastomotic leak (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.45, 1.57), bleeding (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62, 1.89), and anastomotic ulcer (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.62, 6.94). Analysis of RCTs showed closure of defects resulted in lower risks of internal hernia (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19,0.45) and reoperation for SBO (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38, 0.69) but higher risks of SBO not related to internal hernia (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.09, 3.34) and early SBO (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.16, 5.96); no difference was found between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leak (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.80, 4.72), bleeding (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38, 1.17), and anastomotic ulcer (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.62, 6.94). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that closure of mesenteric defects in LRYGB may be associated with lower risks of internal herniation and reoperation for SBO compared with non-closure of the defects (moderate certainty). The available evidence is inconclusive regarding the risks of SBO not related to internal hernia and early SBO (low certainty). More RCTs are needed to improve the robustness of the available evidence.