Paced P-wave morphology templates to guide atrial tachycardia localization: A derivation and validation study.

BACKGROUND: Surface ECG is a useful tool to guide mapping of focal atrial tachycardia (AT). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to construct 12-lead ECG templates for P-wave morphology (PWM) during endocardial pacing from different sites in both atria in patients with no apparent structural heart disease (derivation cohort), with the goal of creating a localization algorithm, which could subsequently be validated in a cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of focal AT (validation cohort). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent electrophysiology study, had no structural heart disease and no atrial enlargement. Atrial pacing, at twice diastolic threshold, was carried out at different anatomical sites in both atria. Paced PWM and duration were assessed. An algorithm was generated from the constructed templates of each pacing site. The algorithm was applied on a retrospective series of successfully ablated AT patients. Overall and site-specific accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Derivation cohort included 65 patients (25 men, age 37 ± 13 years). Atrial pacing was performed in 1025 sites in 61 patients (95%) in RA and in 15 patients (23%) in LA. The validation cohort included 71 patients (28 men, age 52 ± 19 years). AT were right atrial in 66.2%. The algorithm successfully predicted AT origin in 91.5% of patients (100% in LA and 87.2% in RA). It was off by one adjacent segment in the remaining 8.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A simple ECG algorithm based on paced PWM templates was highly accurate in localizing site of origin of focal AT in patients with structurally normal hearts.

Feasibility study shows concordance between image-based virtual-heart ablation targets and predicted ECG-based arrhythmia exit-sites.

INTRODUCTION: We recently developed two noninvasive methodologies to help guide VT ablation: population-derived automated VT exit localization (PAVEL) and virtual-heart arrhythmia ablation targeting (VAAT). We hypothesized that while very different in their nature, limitations, and type of ablation targets (substrate-based vs. clinical VT), the image-based VAAT and the ECG-based PAVEL technologies would be spatially concordant in their predictions. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to test this hypothesis in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients in a retrospective feasibility study. METHODS: Four post-infarct patients who underwent LV VT ablation and had pre-procedural LGE-CMRs were enrolled. Virtual hearts with patient-specific scar and border zone identified potential VTs and ablation targets. Patient-specific PAVEL based on a population-derived statistical method localized VT exit sites onto a patient-specific 238-triangle LV endocardial surface. RESULTS: Ten induced VTs were analyzed and 9-exit sites were localized by PAVEL onto the patient-specific LV endocardial surface. All nine predicted VT exit sites were in the scar border zone defined by voltage mapping and spatially correlated with successful clinical lesions. There were 2.3 ± 1.9 VTs per patient in the models. All five VAAT lesions fell within regions ablated clinically. VAAT targets correlated well with 6 PAVEL-predicted VT exit sites. The distance between the center of the predicted VT-exit-site triangle and nearest corresponding VAAT ablation lesion was 10.7 ± 7.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: VAAT targets are concordant with the patient-specific PAVEL-predicted VT exit sites. These findings support investigation into combining these two complementary technologies as a noninvasive, clinical tool for targeting clinically induced VTs and regions likely to harbor potential VTs.

The effect of revascularization on mortality and risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a reduced ejection fraction benefit from implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear whether this benefit is altered by whether or not revascularization is performed prior to ICD implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study following patients who underwent ICD implantation from 2002 to 2014. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and either primary or secondary prevention ICDs were selected for inclusion. Using the electronic medical record, cardiac catheterization data, revascularization status (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery) were recorded. The outcomes were mortality and ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: There were 606 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.1 years, 11.9% were women, and the mean LVEF was 30.5 ± 12.0, 58.9% had a primary indication for ICD, 82.0% of the cohort had undergone coronary catheterization prior to ICD implantation. In the overall cohort, there were fewer mortality and ventricular arrhythmia events in patients who had undergone prior revascularization. In patients who had an ICD for secondary prevention, revascularization was associated with a decrease in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85) p = 0.015), and a trend towards fewer ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.38, 1.00) p = 0.051). There was no association between death or ventricular arrhythmia with revascularization in patients with primary prevention ICDs. CONCLUSION: Revascularization may be beneficial in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and should be considered as adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Ventricular tachycardia ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with TMEM43 gene mutations.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation of VT in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is often challenging, frequently requiring multiple or epicardial ablation procedures; TMEM43 gene mutations typically cause aggressive disease. We sought to compare VT ablation outcomes for ARVC patients with and without TMEM43 mutations. METHODS: Patients with prior ablation for ARVC-related VT were reviewed. Demographic, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with confirmed TMEM43 gene mutations were compared to those with other known mutations or who had no known mutations. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (10 male, mean age 49 ± 14 years) underwent 29 ablation procedures (median 2 procedures/patient, range 1-6) with a median of 4 targeted VTs/patient (range 1-9). They were followed for a mean duration of 7.3 ± 4.2 years. Gene mutations included TMEM43 (n = 5), PKP2 (n = 2), DSG2 (n = 2), unidentifiable (n = 4). TMEM patients showed more biventricular involvement compared to non-TMEM patients (80% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.032), more inducible VTs during their ablation procedures (mean VTs/patient: 5.8 ± 3 vs. 2.6 ± 1, P = 0.021). Acute and long-term procedural outcomes did not show a significant difference between the two groups, however TMEM patients had worse composite endpoint of death or transplantation (60% vs. 0, P = 0.035; log-rank P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: TMEM43 mutation patients were more likely to have biventricular arrhythmogenic substrate and more inducible VTs at EP study. Despite comparable acute VT ablation outcomes, long-term prognosis is unfavorable.

Localization of ventricular activation origin using patient-specific geometry: Preliminary results.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may include induction of VT and localization of VT-exit site. Our aim was to assess localization performance of a novel statistical pace-mapping method and compare it with performance of an electrocardiographic inverse solution. METHODS: Seven patients undergoing ablation of VT (4 with epicardial, 3 with endocardial exit) aided by electroanatomic mapping underwent intraprocedural 120-lead body-surface potential mapping (BSPM). Two approaches to localization of activation origin were tested: (1) A statistical method, based on multiple linear regression (MLR), which required only the conventional 12-lead ECG for a sufficient number of pacing sites with known origin together with patient-specific geometry of the endocardial/epicardial surface obtained by electroanatomic mapping; and (2) a classical deterministic inverse solution for recovering heart-surface potentials, which required BSPM and patient-specific geometry of the heart and torso obtained via computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: For the MLR method, at least 10-15 pacing sites with known coordinates, together with their corresponding 12-lead ECGs, were required to derive reliable patient-specific regression equations, which then enabled accurate localization of ventricular activation with unknown origin. For 4 patients who underwent epicardial mapping, the median of localization error for the MLR was significantly lower than that for the inverse solution (10.6 vs. 27.3 mm, P  =  0.034); a similar result held for 3 patients who underwent endocardial mapping (7.7 vs. 17.1 mm, P  =  0.017). The pooled localization error for all epicardial and endocardial sites was also significantly smaller for the MLR compared with the inverse solution (P  =  0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The novel pace-mapping approach to localizing the origin of ventricular activation offers an easily implementable supplement and/or alternative to the preprocedure inverse solution; its simplicity makes it suitable for real-time applications during clinical catheter-ablation procedures.

Effect of coronary revascularization on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) postmyocardial infarction (MI) are a higher risk group with significant morbidity and mortality. We examined the impact of prior coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT. METHODS: The VANISH trial randomized 259 patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug-refractory VT to receive escalated medical therapy or catheter ablation. Clinical outcomes were compared according to whether patients have undergone prior revascularization procedures. The primary outcome was a composite of death, appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) shock, or VT storm. The secondary outcomes included elements of the primary outcome, hospitalization, and any ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: 190 patients (73%) had prior coronary revascularization. Revascularization group had more men (97% vs 83%; P  =  0.0003) and patients in that group were older (mean age 69.3 ± 7.6 vs 66.7 ± 9.2; P  =  0.04), had more renal insufficiency (22.6% vs 8.7%; P  =  0.01), and were more likely to have an implanted cardiac resynchronization device (23% vs 10%, P  =  0.03) as compared with the nonrevascularized patients. There were no significant differences in baseline medication use. There was a trend toward fewer hospitalizations in the revascularization group (64% vs 77%; P  =  0.07); there were no differences in the individual outcomes of mortality, VT storm, ICD shocks, recurrent MI, or cardiac failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with an ischemic cause for VT, a history of prior coronary revascularization was not associated with a reduction in ventricular arrhythmia or mortality.

Rapid 12-lead automated localization method: Comparison to electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) in patient-specific geometry.

BACKGROUND: Rapid accurate localization of the site of ventricular activation origin during catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias could facilitate the procedure. Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) using large lead sets can localize the origin of ventricular activation. We have developed an automated method to identify sites of early ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG. We aim to compare the localization accuracy of ECGI and the automated method, identifying pacing sites/VT exit based on a patient-specific model. METHODS: A patient undergoing ablation of VT on the left-ventricular endocardium and epicardium had 120-lead body-surface potential mapping (BSPM) recorded during the procedure. (1) ECGI methodology: The L1-norm regularization was employed to reconstruct epicardial potentials based on patient-specific geometry for localizing endocardial ventricular activation origin. We used the BSPM data corresponding to known endocardial pacing sites and a VT exit site identified by 3D contact mapping to analyze them offline. (2) The automatedmethod: location coordinates of pacing sites together with the time integral of the first 120 ms of the QRS complex of 3 ECG predictors (leads III, V2 and V6) were used to calculate patient-specific regression coefficients to predict the location of unknown sites of ventricular activation origin ("target" sites). Localization error was quantified over all pacing sites in millimeters by comparing the calculated location and the known reference location. RESULTS: Localization was tested for 14 endocardial pacing sites and 1 epicardial VT exit site. For 14 endocardial pacing sites the mean localization error of the automated method was significantly lower than that of the ECGI (8.9 vs. 24.9 mm, p < 0.01), when 10 training pacing sites are used. Emulation of a clinical procedure demonstrated that the automated method achieved localization error of <5 mm for the VT-exit site; while the ECGI approach approximately correlates with the site of VT exit from the scar within a distance of 18.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The automated method using only 3 ECGs shows promise to localize the origin of ventricular activation as tested by pacing, and the VT-exit site and compares favourably to inverse solution calculation, avoiding cumbersome lead sets. As 12-lead ECG data is acquired by current 3D mapping systems, it is conceivable that the algorithm could be directly incorporated into a mapping system. Further validation in a prospective cohort study is needed to confirm and extend observations reported in this study.

Ventricular Tachycardia with ICD Shocks: When to Medicate and When to Ablate.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ventricular tachycardia occurrence in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients may result in shock delivery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, shocks may have deleterious mechanical and psychological effects. Prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation may be warranted. Antiarrhythmic drugs are limited by incomplete efficacy and an unfavorable adverse effect profile. Catheter ablation can be effective but acute complications and long-term VT recurrence risk necessitating repeat ablation should be recognized. A shared clinical decision process accounting for patients' cardiac status, comorbidities, and goals of care is often required. RECENT FINDINGS: There are four published randomized trials of catheter ablation for sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT) in the setting of ischemic heart disease; there are no randomized studies for non-ischemic ventricular substrates. The most recent trial is the VANISH trial which randomly allocated patients with ICD, prior infarction, and SMVT despite first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy to catheter ablation or more aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. During 28 months of follow-up, catheter ablation resulted in a 28% relative risk reduction in the composite endpoint of death, VT storm, and appropriate ICD shock (p = 0.04). In a subgroup analysis, patients having VT despite amiodarone had better outcomes with ablation as compared to increasing amiodarone dose or adding mexiletine. There is evidence for the effectiveness of both catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with myocardial infarction, an implantable defibrillator, and VT. If sotalol is ineffective in suppressing VT, either catheter ablation or initiation of amiodarone is a reasonable option. If VT occurs despite amiodarone therapy, there is evidence that catheter ablation is superior to administration of more aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Early catheter ablation may be appropriate in some clinical situations such as patients presenting with relatively slow VT below ICD detection, electrical storms, hemodynamically stable VT, or in very selected patients with left ventricular assist devices. The optimal first-line suppressive therapy for VT, after ICD implantation and appropriate programming, remains to be determined. Thus far, there has not been a randomized controlled trial to compare catheter ablation to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as a first-line treatment; the VANISH-2 study has been initiated as a pilot to examine this question.

Scar characteristics for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Better risk-stratification tools are needed to identify the best candidates for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Infarct characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become an evolving potential tool for risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the ability of scar characteristics by CMR in patients with postinfarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction to predict sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT). METHODS: Forty-eight patients with postinfarction LV dysfunction underwent CMR study. Twenty-four patients had history of SMVT and the other 24 were control group and underwent electrophysiological study to assess SMVT inducibilty. Various scar characteristics were assessed in the spontaneous SMVT group and were compared with the inducible and noninducible SMVT groups. RESULTS: Only six patients in the control group had inducible SMVT. In univariable analysis, total scar (absolute and as percent of LV), scar core (absolute and as percent of LV), peri-infarct zone (absolute and as percent of LV), mean infarct transmurality, and number of segments with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were statistically significant predictors of spontaneous SMVT experience and SMVT inducibility. In multivariable analysis, total infarct as percent of LV mass was the only significant independent predictor of spontaneous SMVT experience (odds ratio [OR] 1.33 per% change, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.6, P = 0.001) and SMVT inducibility (OR 1.3 per% change, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Characterization of myocardial infarct by LGE-CMR, specifically total infarct size, is better predictor of spontaneous SMVT experience and SMVT inducibility than LV ejection fraction.

The Average Age of Atrioventricular Block Onset in Middle Eastern Patients with Cardiac Rhythm Devices Adjusted for the Overall Young Population: Insights from a Multicenter International Registry.

Background: Previous registries have shown a younger average age at presentation with cardiovascular diseases in the Middle East (ME), but no study has examined atrioventricular block (AVB). Moreover, these comparisons are confounded by younger populations in the ME. We sought to describe the average age at presentation with AVB in ME and quantify the effect of being from ME, adjusted for the overall younger population. Methodology: This was a retrospective analysis of PANORAMA registries, which collected data on patients who underwent cardiac rhythm device placement worldwide. Countries with a median population age of ≤30 were considered 'young countries'. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the effect of being from ME, adjusted for being from a 'young country', on age at presentation with AVB. Results: The study included 5,259 AVB patients, with 640 (8.2%) from the ME. Mean age at presentation was seven years younger in ME than in other regions (62.9 ± 17.8 vs. 70 ± 14.1, P < 0.001). Being from a 'young country' was associated with 5.6 years younger age at presentation (95%CI -6.5--4.6), whereas being from ME was associated with 3.1 years younger age at presentation (95%CI -4.5--1.8), (P < 0.001 for both). Conclusion: The average age at presentation with AVB in the ME is seven years younger than in other regions. While this is mostly driven by the overall younger population, being from the ME appears to be independently associated with younger age. Determinants of the earlier presentation in ME need to be assessed, and care should be taken when applying international recommendations.

Optimization of a 12-Lead Electrocardiography Subset for Automated Early Left Ventricular Activation Localization Approach Based on Pace-Mapping Technology.

BACKGROUND: We previously developed an automated approach based on pace mapping to localise early left ventricular (LV) activation origin. To avoid a singular system, we require pacing from at least 2 more known sites than the number of electrocardiography (ECG) leads used. Fewer leads used means fewer pacing sites required. We sought to identify an optimal minimal ECG lead set for the automated approach. METHODS: We used 1715 LV endocardial pacing sites to create derivation and testing data sets. The derivation data set, consisting of 1012 known pacing sites pooled from 38 patients, was used to identify an optimal 3-lead set by means of random forest regression (RFR), and a second 3-lead set by means of exhaustive search. The performance of these sets and the calculated Frank leads was compared within the testing data set with 703 pacing sites pooled from 25 patients. RESULTS: The RFR yielded III, V1, and V4, whereas the exhaustive search identified leads II, V2 and V6. Comparison of these sets and the calculated Frank leads demonstrated similar performance when using 5 or more known pacing sites. Accuracy improved with additional pacing sites, achieving mean accuracy of < 5 mm, after including up to 9 pacing sites when they were focused on a suspected area of ventricular activation origin (radius < 10 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The RFR identified the quasi-orthogonal leads set to localise the source of LV activation, minimizing the training set of pacing sites. Localization accuracy was high with the use of these leads and was not significantly different from using leads identified by exhaustive search or empiric use of Frank leads.

Improving localization accuracy for non-invasive automated early left ventricular origin localization approach.

Background: We previously developed a non-invasive approach to localize the site of early left ventricular activation origin in real time using 12-lead ECG, and to project the predicted site onto a generic LV endocardial surface using the smallest angle between two vectors algorithm (SA). Objectives: To improve the localization accuracy of the non-invasive approach by utilizing the K-nearest neighbors algorithm (KNN) to reduce projection errors. Methods: Two datasets were used. Dataset #1 had 1012 LV endocardial pacing sites with known coordinates on the generic LV surface and corresponding ECGs, while dataset #2 included 25 clinically-identified VT exit sites and corresponding ECGs. The non-invasive approach used "population" regression coefficients to predict the target coordinates of a pacing site or VT exit site from the initial 120-m QRS integrals of the pacing site/VT ECG. The predicted site coordinates were then projected onto the generic LV surface using either the KNN or SA projection algorithm. Results: The non-invasive approach using the KNN had a significantly lower mean localization error than the SA in both dataset #1 (9.4 vs. 12.5 mm, p < 0.05) and dataset #2 (7.2 vs. 9.5 mm, p < 0.05). The bootstrap method with 1,000 trials confirmed that using KNN had significantly higher predictive accuracy than using the SA in the bootstrap assessment with the left-out sample (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The KNN significantly reduces the projection error and improves the localization accuracy of the non-invasive approach, which shows promise as a tool to identify the site of origin of ventricular arrhythmia in non-invasive clinical modalities.

Disparities in Referral and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated sex disparities in a contemporary Canadian population for utilization of primary prevention ICDs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on patients with reduced LVEF admitted to hospitals from 2010 to 2020 in Nova Scotia (population = 971,935). RESULTS: There were 4406 patients eligible for ICDs: 3108 (71%) men and 1298 (29%) women. The mean follow-up time was 3.9 ± 3.0 years. Rates of coronary disease were similar between men and women (45.8% vs 44.0%; P = 0.28), but men had lower LVEF (26.6 ± 5.9% vs 27.2 ± 5.8%; P = 0.0017). The referral rate for ICD was 11% (n = 487), with 13% of men (n = 403) and 6.5% of women (n = 84) referred (P < 0.001). The ICD implantation rate in the population was 8% (n = 358), with 9.5% of men (n = 296) and 4.8% of women (n = 62) (P < 0.001) receiving the device. Men were more likely than women to receive an ICD (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.61-2.70; P < 0.0001)). There was no significant difference in mortality between men and women (P = 0.2764). There was no significant difference in device therapies between men and women (43.8% vs 31.1%; P = 0.0685). CONCLUSIONS: A significant disparity exists in the utilization of primary prevention ICDs between men and women in a contemporary Canadian population.

Prevalence and management of electrical lead abnormalities in cardiac implantable electronic device leads.

Background: Electrical lead abnormalities (ELAs) can result in device malfunction, leading to significant morbidity in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Objective: We sought to determine the prevalence and management of ELAs in patients with CIEDs. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients implanted with a CIED between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was ELA defined as increased capture threshold (≥2× implantation value), decreased sensing (≤0.5 implantation value), change in impedance (>50% over 3 months), or nonphysiologic potentials. A secondary outcome of device clinic utilization was also collected. Results: There were 2996 unique patients (35% female) included with 4600 leads (57% Abbott, 43% Medtronic). ELAs were observed in 135 (3%) leads, including 124 (92%) Abbott and 10 (7%) Medtronic leads (hazard ratio 9.25, P < .001). Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 2.2 years. ELAs were associated smaller lead French size, atrial location, and Abbott leads. Lead revision was required in 28% of cases. Patients with lead abnormalities had 38% more in-clinic visits per patient year of follow-up compared with those without (P < .001). Conclusion: ELAs were more frequent in certain models, which increased rates of revision and follow-up. Identification of factors that mitigate these abnormalities to improve lead performance are required to improve care for these devices and provide efficient healthcare.

Worldwide Experience With an Irrigated Needle Catheter for Ablation of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: Final Report.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported feasibility of irrigated needle ablation (INA) with a retractable 27-G end-hole needle catheter to treat nonendocardial ventricular arrhythmia substrate, an important cause of ablation failure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes and complications in our entire INA-treated population. METHODS: Patients with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or high-density premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) despite radiofrequency ablation were prospectively enrolled at 4 centers. Endpoints included a 70% decrease in VT frequency or PVC burden decrease to <5,000/24 h at 6 months. RESULTS: INA was performed in 111 patients (median: 2 failed prior ablations, 71% nonischemic heart disease, and left ventricular ejection fraction 36% ± 14%). INA acutely abolished targeted PVCs in 33 of 37 patients (89%), and PVCs were reduced to <5,000/day in 29 patients (78%). During 6-month follow-up, freedom from hospitalization was observed in 50 of 72 patients with VT (69%), and improvement or abolition of VT occurred in 47%. All patients received multiple INA applications, with more in the VT group than in the PVC group (median: 12 [IQR: 7-19] vs 7 [5-15]; P < 0.01). After INA, additional endocardial standard radiofrequency ablation was required in 23% of patients. Adverse events included 4 pericardial effusions (3.5%), 3 cases of (anticipated) atrioventricular block (2.6%), and 3 heart failure exacerbations (2.6%). During 6-month follow-up, 5 deaths occurred; none were procedure-related. CONCLUSIONS: INA achieves improved arrhythmia control in 78% of patients with PVCs and avoids hospitalization in 69% of patients with VT refractory to standard ablation at 6-month follow-up. Procedural risks are acceptable. (Intramural Needle Ablation for Ablation of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia, NCT01791543; Intramural Needle Ablation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias, NCT03204981).

Prospective Multicenter Assessment of a New Intraprocedural Automated System for Localizing Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmia Origins.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to present a new system, the Automatic Arrhythmia Origin Localization (AAOL) system, which used incomplete electroanatomic mapping (EAM) for localization of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (IVA) origin on the patient-specific geometry of left ventricular, right ventricular, and neighboring vessels. The study assessed the accuracy of the system in localizing IVA source sites on cardiac structures where pace mapping is challenging. BACKGROUND: An intraprocedural automated site of origin localization system was previously developed to identify the origin of early left ventricular activation by using 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). However, it has limitations, as it could not identify the site of origin in the right ventricle and relied on acquiring a complete EAM. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing IVA catheter ablation had a 12-lead ECG recorded during clinical arrhythmia and during pacing at various locations identified on EAM geometries. The new system combined 3-lead (III, V2, and V6) 120-ms QRS integrals and patient-specific EAM geometry with pace mapping to predict the site of earliest ventricular activation. The predicted site was projected onto EAM geometry. RESULTS: Twenty-three IVA origin sites were clinically identified by activation mapping and/or pace mapping (8, right ventricle; 15, left ventricle, including 8 from the posteromedial papillary muscle, 2 from the aortic root, and 1 from the distal coronary sinus). The new system achieved a mean localization accuracy of 3.6 mm for the 23 mapped IVAs. CONCLUSIONS: The new intraprocedural AAOL system achieved accurate localization of IVA origin in ventricles and neighboring vessels, which could facilitate ablation procedures for patients with IVAs.

Assessment of an ECG-Based System for Localizing Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Structural Heart Disease.

Background We have previously developed an intraprocedural automatic arrhythmia-origin localization (AAOL) system to identify idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia origins in real time using a 3-lead ECG. The objective was to assess the localization accuracy of ventricular tachycardia (VT) exit and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) origin sites in patients with structural heart disease using the AAOL system. Methods and Results In retrospective and prospective case series studies, a total of 42 patients who underwent VT/PVC ablation in the setting of structural heart disease were recruited at 2 different centers. The AAOL system combines 120-ms QRS integrals of 3 leads (III, V2, V6) with pace mapping to predict VT exit/PVC origin site and projects that site onto the patient-specific electroanatomic mapping surface. VT exit/PVC origin sites were clinically identified by activation mapping and/or pace mapping. The localization error of the VT exit/PVC origin site was assessed by the distance between the clinically identified site and the estimated site. In the retrospective study of 19 patients with structural heart disease, the AAOL system achieved a mean localization accuracy of 6.5±2.6 mm for 25 induced VTs. In the prospective study with 23 patients, mean localization accuracy was 5.9±2.6 mm for 26 VT exit and PVC origin sites. There was no difference in mean localization error in epicardial sites compared with endocardial sites using the AAOL system (6.0 versus 5.8 mm, P=0.895). Conclusions The AAOL system achieved accurate localization of VT exit/PVC origin sites in patients with structural heart disease; its performance is superior to current systems, and thus, it promises to have potential clinical utility.

A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients' platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF. Results: We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%-94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, P = .03). There was no difference in emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Conclusion: The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research.