Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been increasingly recognised as the standard method for identification of the cystic structures, to prevent vasculobiliary injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, its adoption has been anything but universal. A significant proportion of surgeons has a poor understanding of the three requirements. To bridge this gap between theory and practice, we aimed to summarise the available evidence on CVS, emphasising on current debates and future perspectives. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the literature (1995-2021), to identify studies reporting on the CVS. Eligible articles were classified according to methodology and key idea. A quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate effectiveness of the CVS in preventing bile duct injury (BDI). RESULTS: 150 relevant articles were identified, focusing on six main points, (1) safety and effectiveness, (2) intraoperative documentation, (3) complementary imaging techniques, (4) bail-out alternatives, (5) adoption among surgeons, and (6) education and training. The quantitative analysis included 11 studies, with 10,938 cases. Overall, the CVS was achieved in 92.5%. Conversion rate was 4.8%. CVS-related BDI was 0.09% (0.05% technical errors and 0.04% misidentification errors). CONCLUSION: Routine application of the CVS reduces BDI, but does not eliminate them altogether. Besides operative notes, the CVS should be documented by an imaging modality of sufficient quality. When the CVS cannot be safely established, the threshold for bail-out alternatives or complementary imaging should be low. Adoption by the surgical community worldwide shows great variability and focus should be placed on training through structured educational modules.

The Role of Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Resectability of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still considered as one of the most aggressive cancers with low percentages of respectability, despite recent advances in diagnosis. Assessment of preoperative inflammatory markers can increase the rates of resectability. Methods: Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenoinvesticarcinoma in a single pancreatic unit were included. Ninety-six patient during a one year period were eligible for analysis. Results: CRP, d-dimers, and fibrinogen levels were similar between the two groups. On the contrary, there were statistically significant differences regarding the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Conclusions: inflammatory markers can act as an additional tool in predicting resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Revisiting Amyand's Hernia: A 20-Year Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Protrusion of the appendix within an inguinal hernia is termed an Amyand's hernia. A systematic review of case reports and case series of Amyand's hernia was performed, with emphasis on surgical decision-making. METHODS: The English literature (2000-2019) was reviewed, using PubMed and Embase, combining the terms "hernia", "inguinal", "appendix", "appendicitis" and "Amyand". Overall, 231 studies were included, describing 442 patients. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 34 ± 32 years (adults 57.5%, children 42.5%). 91% were males, while a left-sided Amyand's hernia was observed in 9.5%. Of 156 elective hernia repairs, 38.5% underwent appendectomy and 61.5% simple reduction of the appendix. 88% of the adult patients had a mesh repair, without complications. Of 281 acute cases, hernial complications (76%) and acute appendicitis (12%) were the most common preoperative surgical indications. Appendectomy was performed in 79%, more extensive operations in 8% and simple reduction in 13% of cases. A mesh was used in 19% of adult patients following any type of resection and in 81% following reduction of the appendix. Among acute cases, mortality was 1.8% and morbidity 9.2%. Surgical site infections were observed in 3.6%, all of which in patients without mesh implantation. CONCLUSION: In elective Amyand's hernia cases, appendectomy may be considered in certain patients, provided faecal spillage is avoided, to prevent mesh infection. In cases of appendicitis, prosthetic mesh may be used, if the surgical field is relatively clean, whereas endogenous tissue repairs are preferred in cases of heavy contamination.

Unfinished Business: A Systematic Review of Stump Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Stump appendicitis is defined as interval inflammation of any residual appendicular tissue, after an appendicectomy. We present a systematic review of case series and case reports on stump appendicitis, emphasising on risk factors, diagnosis and surgical management. METHODS: The English literature (1945-2018) was reviewed, using PubMed, Embase and GoogleScholar, combining the terms "appendix", "appendicitis", "stump", "residual", "recurrent" and "retained". In total, 127 studies were included, describing 164 patients (males 59%, mean age 36 ± 17 years). RESULTS: Index surgery was open in 59% and laparoscopic in 38%. It was described as "difficult" or "complicated" in 31%. 20% of patients reported episodes of recurrent abdominal pain during the time interval between index and stump appendicitis (range 2 weeks to 60 years, median 2 years). Right lower quadrant pain was the most frequent complain (88%), leukocytosis was found in 56%, whereas 92% of patients underwent imaging testing, which was diagnostic or highly suspicious in 67.5%. Mean delay between beginning of symptoms and surgery was 2.4 ± 2.3 days. The operative approach was open in 61% and laparoscopic in 35% of cases. The operation was characterised as "difficult" or "complicated" in 45%. In the majority (88%), a completion stump appendicectomy was performed, with 11% requiring more extensive procedures. Mean length of resected stump was 3.1 ± 1.6 cm (range 0.5-10 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Stump appendicitis may occur following both open and laparoscopic approach, when the residual stump is > 0.5 cm. Its clinical significance lies in the delayed diagnosis, leading to higher incidence of complications and the need for more extensive surgery.

Ten-year Audit of Safe Bail-Out Alternatives to the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: To prevent vasculobiliary injuries according to the Tokyo Guidelines, Critical View of Safety (CVS) is the recommended method for the identification of the cystic duct and cystic artery. Our aim was to audit laparoscopic cholecystectomies, in order to determine the rate of CVS feasibility and to explore safe bail-out alternatives, when CVS cannot be obtained. METHODS: Patients who underwent either elective or emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, between January 2009 and December 2018, in whom the CVS was attempted, were retrospectively identified from the institutional electronic database. Dissection technique was documented in the operative notes. Bile duct injuries (BDI) were classified by the Strasberg classification, and their management and outcome were reported in the patient files. RESULTS: In total, 1226 cases were included in the final analysis. CVS was feasible in 1128 cases (92.0%), whereas 65 patients (5.3%) were managed laparoscopically by a bail-out technique. Of those, 52 (4.3%) underwent a subtotal cholecystectomy, 12 (0.9%) a fundus-first cholecystectomy, and in one patient (0.1%) the operation was concluded by a tube cholecystostomy. Overall conversion rate was 2.7% (33/1226 cases). Male gender, older age, junior surgeons, and acute cholecystitis were significantly associated with higher conversion rates. Post-operatively, 10 patients (0.82%) developed a type A bile leakage. No major BDI (types B-E) were observed, either with CVS or the bail-out techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that CVS and the bail-out alternatives complement each other in preventing major BDI and should belong to the armamentarium of every modern surgeon.

Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer offers a surgical specimen of higher quality, with higher number of lymph nodes compared to conventional colectomy. However, evidence on oncological outcomes is limited. The aim of the present study is to review recent literature and provide more information regarding the effect of CME colectomy on short- and long-term outcomes. METHOD: PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched, and articles in English reporting data on CME were reviewed. Intraoperative events; postoperative morbidity and mortality; histopathological characteristics, including macroscopic assessment, number, and status of retrieved lymph nodes; and oncological outcomes were the end-points. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were analyzed. As regards the macroscopic assessment, a larger specimen (p = 0.02) that contains a higher number of lymph nodes (p < 0.00001) is acquired after CME. Two studies report a higher disease-free survival, in stage I and II and particularly in stage III disease after CME. CME by laparoscopy offers comparable outcomes, as regards intraoperative blood loss and immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Specimen quality is similar after either approach, for cancers located at the right and left colon, but not at the transverse colon. CONCLUSION: There is strong evidence that CME offers a longer central pedicle that contains more lymph nodes than conventional surgery for colon cancer. CME represents the surgical background for the maximum lymph node harvest, an important quality marker for the surgical outcome. However, and according to present data, there is limited evidence that colectomy in terms of CME leads to improved long-term oncological outcomes.

Impact of biliary stenting on surgical outcome in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. A retrospective study in a single institution.

PURPOSE: There are conflicting views regarding preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of jaundice resolution on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy in a single institution since 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups, depending on the presence or not of preoperative biliary drainage. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (PBD group), while 105 patients had no biliary drainage (non-PBD group). No significant difference between the two groups could be identified in terms of overall complications (p = 0.121) or mortality (p = 1). There was no significant difference regarding pancreatic fistula (p = 0.554), delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.127), hemorrhage (p = 0.426), number of reoperations (p = 1.000) or readmissions (p = 1.000). The only significant difference was found in the hospital stay, where patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage had a prolonged length of stay of more 3 days (15.52 vs. 11.31) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing pancreatectomy does not increase the rates of postoperative morbidity or mortality, but has a negative effect on hospital stay.

Improvement of gastric emptying by enhanced recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has improved postoperative outcomes particularly in colorectal surgery. This study aimed to assess compliance with an ERAS protocol and evaluate its effect on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients who had received conventional perioperative management from 2005 to 2009 (conventional group) were compared with 75 patients who had received perioperative care with an ERAS protocol (fast-track group) from 2010 to 2014. Mortality, complications, readmissions and length of hospital stay were evaluated and compared in the groups. RESULTS: Compliance with each element of the ERAS protocol ranged from 74.7% to 100%. Uneventful patients had a significant higher adherence to the ERAS protocol (87.5% vs 40.7%; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in demographics and perioperative characteristics between the two groups. Patients in the fast-track group had a shorter time to remove the nasogastric tube, start liquid diet and solid food, pass flatus and stools, and remove drains. No difference was found in mortality, relaparotomy, readmission rates and overall morbidity. However, delayed gastric emptying and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced in the fast-track group. The independent effect of the ERAS protocol in reducing delayed gastric emptying and length of hospital stay was confirmed by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: ERAS pathway was feasible and safe in improving gastric emptying, yielding an earlier postoperative recovery, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features.

BACKGROUND: The relation between para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) involvement and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) survival, along with the optimal handling of this particular lymph node station remain unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess this. METHODS: A search of Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane databases was performed until July 2015 to identify studies reporting on the relation of PALN involvement and PDAC outcomes and a meta-analysis was performed following data extraction. RESULTS: Ten retrospective studies and two prospective non randomized studies (2467 patients) were included. Patients with positive PALN had worse one (p < 0.00001) and two year (p < 0.00001) survival when compared with patients with negative PALN. Even when comparing only patients with positive lymph nodes (N1), patients with PALN involvement presented with a significant lower one (p = 0.03) and two (p = 0.002) year survival. PALN involvement was associated with an increased possibility of positive margin (R1) resection (p < 0.00001), stations' 12, 14 and 17 malignant infiltration (p < 0.00001), but not with tumour stage (p = 0.78). DISCUSSION: Involvement of PALN is associated with decreased survival in pancreatic cancer patients. However, existence of long term survivors among this subgroup of patients should be further evaluated, in order to identify factors associated with their favourable prognosis.

Achieving a Textbook Outcome in Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer surgery is a complex clinical pathway and traditional quality metrics may exhibit significant variability between hospitals and healthcare providers. The Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite quality marker capturing the fraction of patients, in whom all desired short-term outcomes of care are realised. The aim of the present study was to assess the TO in a series of non-metastatic colon cancer patients treated with curative intent, with emphasis on long-term survival. METHODS: Stage I-III colon cancer patients, who underwent curative colectomy following the Complete Mesocolic Excision principles, were retrospectively identified from the institutional database. TO was defined as (i) hospital survival, (ii) radical resection, (iii) no major complications, (iv) no reintervention, (v) no unplanned stoma and (vi) no prolonged hospital stay or readmission. RESULTS: In total, 128 patients (male 61%, female 39%, mean age 70.7 ± 11.4 years) were included in the final analysis. Overall, 60.2% achieved a TO. The highest rates were observed for "hospital survival" and "no unplanned stoma" (96.9% and 97.7%), while the lowest rates were for "no major complications" and "no prolonged hospital stay" (69.5% and 75%). Older age, left-sided resections and pT4 tumours were factors limiting the chances of a TO. The 5-year overall and 5-year cancer-specific survival were significantly better in the TO versus non-TO subgroup (81% vs. 59%, p = 0.009, and 86% vs. 65%, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in colon cancer surgery may be affected by patient-, doctor- and hospital-related factors. TO represents those patients who achieve the optimal perioperative results, and is furthermore associated with improved long-term cancer survival.

Elective surgery for conservatively treated acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Elective surgery has been proposed, after at least two episodes of acute diverticulitis, initially treated conservatively, in order to prevent further episodes or chronic complaints. However, prophylactic surgery has been questioned, due to the associated risks of postoperative mortality and morbidity, as well as the risk of recurrent diverticulitis. This systematic review attempts to assess the role of prophylactic left colonic resection, after episodes of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis treated either conservatively with antibiotics and/or other supportive measures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey I). The main endpoint was treatment failure, defined as persistent/recurrent symptoms or need for readmission and/or reintervention. Secondary endpoints were the immediate postoperative outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, 24 studies with 2855 patients were included in the analysis. Intra- and postoperative complications rate were 5% and 16%, respectively. Anastomotic leak was 1.3% and emergency reoperation was 2.4%. Long-term symptomatic resolve was reported at 91%. Persistent or recurrent symptoms were observed in 5.4% of cases. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in recurrence rates between surgical and conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Elective surgery to prevent recurrent diverticulitis is not recommended, irrespective of the number of previous episodes. Generally, elective sigmoidectomy should not be recommended to patients with ongoing atypical lower abdominal symptoms after acute diverticulitis, but should aim primarily at improving quality of life. It should be offered to patients with ongoing inflammation, or diverticular complications.

Morphology of the sulcus of the caudate process (Rouviere's sulcus) in a Greek population and a systematic review with meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and to investigate the morphology of the sulcus of the caudate process in a Greek population, along with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Overall, 103 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the analysis. The sulcus was present in 91% and three morphological variants were identified (groove 69%, slit 21% and scar 10%). The sulcus had a horizontal course in 90% of patients and a mean length of 25 ± 13 mm. The meta-analysis included 27 surgical and 11 cadaveric studies with 6661 cases in total. The pooled prevalence of the sulcus was 80% and did not differ significantly among various geographical regions. Concerning sulcus subtypes, the binary "open/fused" classification was used to unify the heterogeneous data. The "open" type was more frequent than the "fused" (64.5% vs 35.5%). A horizontal course was observed in 53.5% and an oblique in 45.7%. The sulcus contained the right portal pedicle in 38%, the right posterior portal pedicle in 37%, and the right posteroinferior pedicle in 23.5%. In conclusion, the sulcus of the caudate process is a very helpful anatomical landmark in hepatectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy and can be identified in the majority of patients. However, various classifications for the morphological variants and diverse terminology cause discrepancy in the literature and create the need for a single classification system. The proposed 3-tier classification (groove, slit, scar) is simple and easy to remember and avoids ambiguous nomenclature.

Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety.

Background The present study assesses the educational value of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos on YouTube regarding the correct application of the critical view of safety (CVS), and evaluates… surgical trainees' perceptions of the CVS criteria in a simulated, operative decision-making exercise. Methods YouTube was systematically searched for laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, explicitly reporting a satisfactory CVS. The top 30 most popular videos, by number of views, were identified and scored on the 6-point scale by three experienced consultants. After watching a training module on CVS rationale and criteria, 10 trainees, blinded to the consultants' assessment, were instructed to view the videos, score each criterion and answer the binary question "Would you divide the cystic structures?" by "yes" or "no." Results An inadequate CVS was found in 30% of the included videos. No statistical association was noted between number of views, likes, or dislikes with successful CVS rates. Inter-observer agreement between consultants and trainees ranged from minimal to moderate ( k = 0.07-0.60). Discrepancy between trainees' CVS scores and their simulated decision to proceed to division of the cystic structures was found in 15% of assessments, with intra-observer agreement ranging from minimal to excellent ( k = 0.27-1.0). For the CVS requirements, inter-observer agreement was minimal for the dissection of the cystic plate ( k = 0.26) and triangle clearance ( k = 0.39) and moderate for the identification of two and only two structures ( k = 0.42). Conclusion The CVS is central to the culture of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical videos are a useful training tool as simulated, operative decision-making exercises. However, public video platforms should be used judiciously, since their content is not peer-reviewed or quality-controlled.

Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Gastric Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of gastric cancer.

Gastric Cancer epidemics have changed over recent decades, declining in incidence, shifting from distal to proximal location, transforming from intestinal to diffuse histology. Novel chemotherapeutic agents combined with modern surgical operations hardly changed overall disease related survival. This may be attributed to a substantial inherent geographical variation of disease genetics, but also to a failure to standardize and implement treatment protocols in clinical practice. To overcome these drawbacks in Greece and Cyprus, a Gastric Cancer Study Group under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO) and Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG) merged their efforts to produce a consensus considering ethnic parameters of healthcare system and the international proposals as well. Utilizing structured meetings of experts, a consensus was reached. To achieve further consensus, statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology by invited multidisciplinary national and international experts. Sentences were considered of high or low consensus if they were voted by ≥ 80%, or < 80%, respectively; those obtaining a low consensus level after both voting rounds were rejected. Forty-five statements were developed and voted by 71 experts. The median rate of abstention per statement was 9.9% (range: 0-53.5%). At the end of the process, one statement was rejected, another revised, and all the remaining achieved a high consensus. Forty-four recommendations covering all aspects of the management of gastric cancer and concise treatment algorithms are proposed by the Hellenic and Cypriot Gastric Cancer Study Group. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and individualization are emphasized.

Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.

In spite of recent advances in the diagnosis and management of oesophageal cancer, the overall survival of the disease worldwide remains disappointingly low. In Greece and Cyprus, this may be partly due to a failure of health care providers to implement standardised treatment protocols in clinical practice. Development of clinical practice guidelines was undertaken as a joint project between the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO) and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG) in an effort to provide guidance for Greek and Cypriot clinicians in all aspects of the management of oesophageal cancer. A study group was formed comprising clinicians from different disciplines with a special interest in the management of oesophageal cancer. Following extensive review of the literature, the members of the group met in person and consensus statements were developed, which were later subjected to the Delphi survey process by invited national and international experts. Statements that achieved a rate of voting consensus > 80% were adopted. Those that reached a voting consensus of < 80% were revised or rejected. In total, 46 sentences were developed and subjected to the voting process. Of those, 45 sentences achieved a rate of consensus > 80% during the first voting round. One sentence that did not reach a satisfactory rate of consensus was revised by the members of the study group and subsequently incorporated to the final statement. Forty-six recommendations covering all aspects of the management of oesophageal cancer and concise treatment algorithms are proposed by the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group. In particular, centralisation of services, care by multidisciplinary teams and adherence to clinical guidelines are strongly recommended.

Review of management options for pancreatic pseudocysts.

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) present a challenging problem for physicians dealing with pancreatic disorders. Their management demands the co-operation of surgeons, radiologists and gastroenterologists. Historically, they have been treated either conservatively or surgically, with acceptable rates of complications and recurrence. However, recent advances in radiology and endoscopy, have leaded physicians to implement percutaneous and endoscopic drainage (ED) into their treatment algorithms. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery, with its advantages, has become an attractive alternative choice when surgical drainage (SD) is required. The aim of this review is to summarize the main diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the management of pseudocysts and to present the main studies that compare the three different types of pseudocyst drainage.

Does Conversion to Open of Laparoscopically Attempted Rectal Cancer Cases Affect Short- and Long-Term Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is a challenge as it presents many technical difficulties and requires high level of expertise. That is the reason for the high conversion rate. Reports on outcomes of converted cases after laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer are conflicting. AIM: The present meta-analysis compares short- and long-term outcomes between converted rectal cancer cases with both open and laparoscopically completed cases. METHOD: All studies reporting on outcomes separately for the converted cases were reviewed systematically. Main outcomes were intraoperative complications, procedure duration, short-term mortality and morbidity, length of stay, local recurrence, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and distant metastases. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by 3 reviewers. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were eligible for analysis, including 10,845 patients. Overall conversion rate was 11.9%. Converted cases had significantly longer duration, hospital stay, and higher rates of wound infection compared with laparoscopic cases. All other outcomes had no difference. When compared with open cases, conversions displayed longer operative times, but there was no other significant difference in the short- or long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Converted cases seem to have some short-term unfavorable outcomes. Further retrospective analysis of big registries will be helpful for further investigation of converted cases.

Is complete mesocolic excision oncologically superior to conventional surgery for colon cancer? A retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, many efforts have been made in order to improve the oncologic outcomes following colonic resection. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has proved to provide high rates of disease-free and overall survival rates in patients undergoing resection for colonic malignancies. The aim of our study was to further investigate the role of CME in colonic surgery through comparison with a series of conventional resections. METHODS: All data regarding resections for colonic cancer since 2006 were obtained prospectively from two surgical departments. Retrieved data from 290 patients were analyzed and compared between those who underwent CME and those who had conventional surgery. RESULTS: The CME group presented a higher rate of postoperative morbidity and readmissions. Histopathological features were in favor of CME surgery compared with the conventional group, in terms of both resected bowel length (33 vs. 20 cm) and lymph node harvest (27 vs. 18). Although CME was associated with better disease-free and overall survival times, only tumor differentiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and age had a statistically significant affect on those outcome values (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: CME improves histopathologic features, but without presenting oncologic superiority. Larger prospective studies following adequate surgical training are needed to prove the technique's advantages in oncologic outcomes.

Innovations in macroscopic evaluation of pancreatic specimens and radiologic correlation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel dissection technique of surgical specimens in different cases of pancreatic tumors and provide a radiologic pathologic correlation. In our hospital, that is a referral center for pancreatic diseases, the macroscopic evaluation of the pancreatectomy specimens is performed by the pathologists using the axial slicing technique (instead of the traditional procedure with longitudinal opening of the main pancreatic and/or common bile duct and slicing along the plane defined by both ducts). The specimen is sliced in an axial plane that is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the descending duodenum. The procedure results in a large number of thin slices (3-4 mm). This plane is identical to that of CT or MRI and correlation between pathology and imaging is straightforward. We studied 70 cases of suspected different solid and cystic pancreatic tumors and we correlated the tumor size and location, the structure-consistency (areas of necrosis-hemorrhage-fibrosis-inflammation), the degree of vessels' infiltration, the size of pancreatic and common bile duct and the distance from resection margins. Missed findings by imaging or pitfalls were recorded and we tried to explain all discrepancies between radiology evaluation and the histopathological findings. Radiologic-pathologic correlation is extremely important, adding crucial information on imaging limitations and enabling quality assessment of surgical specimens. The deep knowledge of different pancreatic tumors' consistency and way of extension helps to improve radiologists' diagnostic accuracy and minimize the radiological-surgical mismatching, preventing patients from unnecessary surgery.