Neurocognitive correlates of metabolic dysregulation in individuals with mood disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Individuals with mood disorders are predisposed to metabolic dysfunction, while those with metabolic dysregulation such as diabetes and obesity experience more severe depressive symptoms. Both metabolic dysfunction and mood disorders are independently associated with cognitive deficits. Therefore, given their close association, this study aimed to explore the association between metabolic dysfunction in individuals with mood disorders in relation to cognitive outcomes. A comprehensive search comprised of these three domains was carried out; a random-effects meta-analysis pooling mean cognitive outcomes was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022295765). Sixty-three studies were included in this review; 26 were synthesized in a quantitative meta-analysis. Comorbid metabolic dysregulation was associated with significantly lower global cognition among individuals with mood disorders. These trends were significant within each mood disorder subgroup, including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and self-report depression/depressive symptoms. Type 2 diabetes was associated with the lowest cognitive performance in individuals with mood disorders, followed by peripheral insulin resistance, body mass index ⩾25 kg/m2, and metabolic syndrome. Significant reduction in scores was also observed among individual cognitive domains (in descending order) of working memory, attention, executive function, processing speed, verbal memory, and visual memory. These findings demonstrate the detrimental effects of comorbid metabolic dysfunction in individuals with mood disorders. Further research is required to understand the underlying mechanisms connecting mood disorders, metabolism, and cognition.

Depression in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Caregivers play a vitally important role in the lives of people with schizophrenia. However, their mental health can often be overlooked. In recent years, with increasing attention to mental health and wellness, common mental illness such as depression in caregivers of people with schizophrenia has received renewed attention. The purpose of this review was to consolidate and synthesize recent literature on (1) the prevalence of depression in caregivers of people with schizophrenia, (2) factors associated with depression in caregivers of people with schizophrenia, and (3) interventions that target depression in caregivers of people with schizophrenia. METHODS: A systematic search focusing on literature published between 2010 and 2022 was done to retrieve relevant articles from the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Ovid Psych INFO. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Nine evaluated the prevalence of depression, 18 evaluated factors associated with depression in caregivers, and 6 examined interventions targeting depression. The prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in samples of caregivers ranged between 12 and 40% across the studies. Females, especially mothers of people with schizophrenia, were more likely to experience depression, followed by younger caregivers. Several factors, including gender, interpersonal relationships, social support, stigma, literacy, and financial constraints, were identified as factors associated with depression in caregivers. Several interventions like yoga, emotional training, and psychoeducation were evaluated, and they showed a significant reduction in the level of depression and depressive symptoms experienced by the caregiver population. CONCLUSIONS: Depression in caregivers in this clinical population may be widespread and warrants further study. There are promising interventions that can target depression in caregivers. Well-designed longitudinal studies may help identify caregivers at risk of developing depression and further inform targets for intervention.

Addressing Metabolic Comorbidity in Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability on Antipsychotics: A Clinical Case Series.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) are at increased risk for serious metabolic comorbidities, which is further exacerbated by the high rate of antipsychotic use in this population. There is currently a lack of literature on effective treatment options for antipsychotic-induced weight gain and metabolic abnormalities in IDD. This case series reports on the clinical use of metformin in patients with IDD on antipsychotics. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We conducted a retrospective review of patients in a novel clinical service at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Ontario, Canada for adults with IDD experiencing antipsychotic-related weight gain and other metabolic aberrations. Charts were reviewed for weight and other metabolic outcome measures before and after commencing metformin treatment. FINDINGS/RESULTS: In 11 patients referred to this clinic, the mean weight loss while on metformin treatment was 11.1 kg, with over 50% of the sample achieving clinically meaningful weight loss of >7%. Additional adaptive changes were observed for fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In line with its use in severe mental illness, metformin may be a safe, effective, and accessible treatment option for patients with IDD experiencing metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic medication. Further research and randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the efficacy of metformin in this population.

Antipsychotics impair regulation of glucose metabolism by central glucose.

Hypothalamic detection of elevated circulating glucose triggers suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) to maintain glucose homeostasis. Antipsychotics alleviate symptoms associated with schizophrenia but also increase the risk for impaired glucose metabolism. In the current study, we examined whether two acutely administered antipsychotics from different drug classes, haloperidol (first generation antipsychotic) and olanzapine (second generation antipsychotic), affect the ability of intracerebroventricular (ICV) glucose infusion approximating postprandial levels to suppress EGP. The experimental protocol consisted of a pancreatic euglycemic clamp, followed by kinomic and RNA-seq analyses of hypothalamic samples to determine changes in serine/threonine kinase activity and gene expression, respectively. Both antipsychotics inhibited ICV glucose-mediated increases in glucose infusion rate during the clamp, a measure of whole-body glucose metabolism. Similarly, olanzapine and haloperidol blocked central glucose-induced suppression of EGP. ICV glucose stimulated the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, and kinases capable of activating KATP channels in the hypothalamus. These effects were inhibited by both antipsychotics. In conclusion, olanzapine and haloperidol impair central glucose sensing. Although results of hypothalamic analyses in our study do not prove causality, they are novel and provide the basis for a multitude of future studies.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain in Severe Mental Illness: Risk Factors and Special Considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Weight gain is a disconcerting issue experienced by patients treated with antipsychotics (APs). This review summarizes current knowledge on the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG), and evidence for interventions, including special considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Predisposing risk factors for AIWG include lack of prior AP exposure, sex, and age. AP dose and duration of exposure are additional treatment-related factors that may contribute to this issue. Among current approaches to target AIWG, metformin has the most evidence to support its use, and this is increasingly reflected in clinical guidelines. While lifestyle approaches are recommended, cost-effectiveness and scalability represent limitations. More research is needed to identify newer treatment options and inform clinical recommendations for AIWG. Concerns around scope of practice in psychiatry to address AIWG and related comorbidities will require enhanced training opportunities and interdisciplinary collaborations, as well as updated position statements/practice guidelines emphasizing prevention.

The metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic use in individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disability (IDD) are often prescribed antipsychotics (APs). However, despite their known propensity to cause metabolic adverse effects, including weight gain, diabetes, and increased risk of cardiovascular events, there is currently a limited body of literature describing the metabolic consequences of AP use in this population. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases to identify all randomized trials that reported on the metabolic effects of APs in individuals with IDD. Random effects meta-analyses were used to examine weight gain as both a continuous and dichotomous outcome. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized trials met our inclusion criteria with a total of 1376 patients across a variety of IDDs. AP use was associated with significantly greater weight gain compared with placebo (Continuous: mean difference = 1.10 kg, [0.79, 1.40], p < 0.00001, I2  = 54%; Dichotomous: odds ratio = 3.94, [2.15, 7.23], p < 0.00001, I2  = 0). Sub-group analysis revealed no significant effect of AP type. Data regarding the effects of APs on other metabolic outcomes were limited. CONCLUSION: This review (PROSPERO # CRD42021255558) demonstrates that AP use is associated with significant weight gain among patients with IDD. Concerningly, most reported studies were in children and adolescents, which sets up an already vulnerable population for adverse medical sequalae at an early age. There was also a lack of long-term studies in adults with IDD. Further studies are required to better understand how AP use affects metabolic parameters in this group of individuals.

Metformin for the prevention of clozapine-induced weight gain: A retrospective naturalistic cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is presently the sole antipsychotic with an indication for treatment-resistant Schizophrenia, but is associated with significant weight gain and other metabolic aberrations. This retrospective chart review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive metformin in preventing clozapine-induced weight gain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients newly initiated on clozapine at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Canada, from November 2014 to April 2021. Our primary outcome was body weight at 6 and 12 months after clozapine initiation. Other metabolic parameters served as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 396 patients (males: 71.5%, mean age: 42.8 years) initiated on clozapine, 69 were on metformin or prescribed it ≤3 months after clozapine initiation. The clozapine+metformin group demonstrated less weight gain compared with the clozapine-only group at 6 months (clozapine+metformin: -0.15 kg [SE = 1.08] vs. clozapine-only: 2.99 kg, SE = 0.54) and 12 months after clozapine initiation (clozapine+metformin: -0.67 kg, SE = 1.22 vs. clozapine-only: 4.72 kg, SE = 0.67). Adaptive changes were also observed for fasting glucose (F = 3.10, p = 0.046) and triglycerides (F = 8.56, p < 0.001) in the clozapine+metformin group compared with clozapine only. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective naturalistic cohort study, co-prescription of clozapine and metformin was associated with less weight gain and related metabolic dysfunction at 6 and 12 months after initiation versus clozapine alone. These findings provide evidence for the effectiveness of metformin in preventing clozapine-induced weight gain; larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Peer-facilitated interventions for improving the physical health of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of peer-facilitated interventions for improving the physical health of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of peer-facilitated interventions for people with serious mental illness, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders, in which physical health outcomes were assessed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and PubMed. In addition, reference lists of reviews were examined for further relevant studies published to 10 November 2021. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included fourteen publications (thirteen randomised controlled trials of ten peer-facilitated interventions, and one secondary analysis; total of 2099 participants) that assessed physical health outcomes for people with mental health conditions, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Intervention duration ranged from three to eighteen months; peers were involved as sole or co-leaders of the programs in group or individual sessions. Meta-analysis identified a statistically significant pooled effect on physical activity and capacity (various measures; six studies; 468 intervention, 461 control participants; standardised mean difference, +0.19 standard deviation [SD]; 95% CI, +0.06-0.32 SD; I2  = 0%); overall GRADE certainty of evidence was low. Marked study heterogeneity precluded secure conclusions regarding intervention effects on self-rated physical health, healthy eating, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-facilitated interventions for improving physical outcomes are feasible for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, a group at particular risk of certain physical health conditions. Further research is required to assess the effects of such interventions on other health-related parameters. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021283578 (retrospective).

Pharmacological interventions for prevention of weight gain in people with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic-induced weight gain is an extremely common problem in people with schizophrenia and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Adjunctive pharmacological interventions may be necessary to help manage antipsychotic-induced weight gain. This review splits and updates a previous Cochrane Review that focused on both pharmacological and behavioural approaches to this problem. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for preventing antipsychotic-induced weight gain in people with schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Schizophrenia Information Specialist searched Cochrane Schizophrenia's Register of Trials on 10 February 2021. There are no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examined any adjunctive pharmacological intervention for preventing weight gain in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses who use antipsychotic medications. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. For continuous outcomes, we combined mean differences (MD) in endpoint and change data in the analysis. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RR). We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE to judge certainty of evidence and create summary of findings tables. The primary outcomes for this review were clinically important change in weight, clinically important change in body mass index (BMI), leaving the study early, compliance with treatment, and frequency of nausea. The included studies rarely reported these outcomes, so, post hoc, we added two new outcomes, average endpoint/change in weight and average endpoint/change in BMI. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs, with a total of 1388 participants, met the inclusion criteria for the review. Five studies investigated metformin, three topiramate, three H2 antagonists, three monoamine modulators, and one each investigated monoamine modulators plus betahistine, melatonin and samidorphan. The comparator in all studies was placebo or no treatment (i.e. standard care alone). We synthesised all studies in a quantitative meta-analysis. Most studies inadequately reported their methods of allocation concealment and blinding of participants and personnel. The resulting risk of bias and often small sample sizes limited the overall certainty of the evidence. Only one reboxetine study reported the primary outcome, number of participants with clinically important change in weight. Fewer people in the treatment condition experienced weight gains of more than 5% and more than 7% of their bodyweight than those in the placebo group (> 5% weight gain RR 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.65; 1 study, 43 participants; > 7% weight gain RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.83; 1 study, 43 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported the primary outcomes, 'clinically important change in BMI', or 'compliance with treatment'. However, several studies reported 'average endpoint/change in body weight' or 'average endpoint/change in BMI'. Metformin may be effective in preventing weight gain (MD -4.03 kg, 95% CI -5.78 to -2.28; 4 studies, 131 participants; low-certainty evidence); and BMI increase (MD -1.63 kg/m2, 95% CI -2.96 to -0.29; 5 studies, 227 participants; low-certainty evidence). Other agents that may be slightly effective in preventing weight gain include H2 antagonists such as nizatidine, famotidine and ranitidine (MD -1.32 kg, 95% CI -2.09 to -0.56; 3 studies, 248 participants; low-certainty evidence) and monoamine modulators such as reboxetine and fluoxetine (weight: MD -1.89 kg, 95% CI -3.31 to -0.47; 3 studies, 103 participants; low-certainty evidence; BMI: MD -0.66 kg/m2, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.26; 3 studies, 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). Topiramate did not appear effective in preventing weight gain (MD -4.82 kg, 95% CI -9.99 to 0.35; 3 studies, 168 participants; very low-certainty evidence). For all agents, there was no difference between groups in terms of individuals leaving the study or reports of nausea. However, the results of these outcomes are uncertain given the very low-certainty evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low-certainty evidence to suggest that metformin may be effective in preventing weight gain. Interpretation of this result and those for other agents, is limited by the small number of studies, small sample size, and short study duration. In future, we need studies that are adequately powered and with longer treatment durations to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for managing weight gain.

Adiposity in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although a relationship between schizophrenia (SCZ), antipsychotic (AP) medication, and metabolic dysregulation is now well established, the effect of adiposity is less well understood. By synthesizing findings from imaging techniques that measure adiposity, our systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020192977) aims to determine the adiposity-related effects of illness and treatment in this patient population. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Scopus for all relevant case-control and prospective longitudinal studies from inception until February 2021. Measures of adiposity including percent body fat (%BF), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were analyzed as primary outcomes. RESULTS: Our search identified 29 articles that used imaging methods to quantify adiposity among patients with SCZ spectrum disorders. Analyses revealed that patients have greater %BF (mean difference (MD) = 3.09%; 95% CI: 0.75-5.44), SAT (MD = 24.29 cm2 ; 95% CI: 2.97-45.61) and VAT (MD = 33.73 cm2 , 95% CI: 4.19-63.27) compared to healthy controls. AP treatment was found to increase SAT (MD = 31.98 cm2 ; 95% CI: 11.33-52.64) and VAT (MD = 16.30 cm2 ; 95% CI: 8.17-24.44) with no effect on %BF. However, change in %BF was higher for AP-free/AP-naïve patients compared to treated patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with SCZ spectrum disorders have greater adiposity than healthy controls, which is increased by AP treatment. Young, AP-naïve patients may be particularly susceptible to this effect. Future studies should explore the effect of specific APs on adiposity and its relation to overall metabolic health.

Investigation of the Gut Microbiome in Patients with Schizophrenia and Clozapine-Induced Weight Gain: Protocol and Clinical Characteristics of First Patient Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests an important role of the human gut microbiome in psychiatry and neurodevelopmental disorders. An increasing body of literature based on animal studies has reported that the gut microbiome influences brain development and behavior by interacting with the gut-brain axis. Furthermore, as the gut microbiome has an important role in metabolism and is known to interact with pharmaceuticals, recent evidence suggests a role for the microbiome in antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects in animals and humans. PURPOSE: Here we present the protocol for a two-phase study investigating the gut microbiome in healthy controls and in patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics. METHODS: Phase I of our study involves humans exclusively. We recruit 25 patients who are chronically treated with clozapine and compare them with 25 healthy controls matched for age, sex, BMI, and smoking status. A second cohort consists of 25 patients newly starting on clozapine, and a third cohort includes 25 antipsychotic-naive patients. The patients in the second cohort and third cohort are prospectively assessed for up to 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. Phase II of this study will incorporate microbiota humanized mouse models to examine the influence of human fecal transplant on metabolic parameters and the gut-brain axis. Progress and Future Directions: We are underway with the first participants enrolled in all phase I treatment cohorts. This study will contribute to elucidating the role of the gut microbiome in schizophrenia and metabolic side effects. In addition, its results may help to explore potential therapeutic targets for antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects.

CHRFAM7A gene expression in schizophrenia: clinical correlates and the effect of antipsychotic treatment.

Earlier studies have implicated CHRNA7, coding α-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR), and its partially duplicated chimeric gene CHRFAM7A in schizophrenia. However, the relationship between the alterations in peripheral gene expression of CHRFAM7A and severity of clinical symptoms has not been examined. Furthermore, potential influence of the antipsychotic medication on CHRFAM7A expression in drug-naive or drug-free schizophrenia is an unexplored area. CHRFAM7A gene expression in lymphocytes was analyzed in 90 antipsychotic-naïve or free schizophrenia patients using TaqMan-based quantitative RT-PCR. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms and Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). The relationship between psychopathology and CHRFAM7A expression was examined. In addition, measurement of CHRFAM7A gene expression was repeated during follow-up after short-term antipsychotic treatment in 38 patients. There was significant inverse correlation between CHRFAM7A expression and total negative psychopathology score-SANS, and this relationship persisted after accounting for possible confounders such as age, sex and smoking. On exploration of the factor structure of psychopathology using principal component analysis, all the negative symptoms-affective flattening, alogia, apathy, anhedonia and inattention were found to be inversely associated with CHRFAM7A expression. Furthermore, analysis of repeated measures revealed a significant increase in CHRFAM7A expression in patients after short-term administration of antipsychotic medication. Our study observations support the role for CHRFAM7A gene in schizophrenia pathogenesis and suggest a potential novel link between deficient CHRFAM7A expression and negative psychopathology. Furthermore, up-regulation of CHRFAM7A gene expression by antipsychotics suggests that it could be a potential state marker for clinical severity.

Gene polymorphisms and response to transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Recent observations demonstrate a significant ameliorative effect of add-on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) in schizophrenia. Of the many SNPs, NRG1 rs35753505 and catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) rs4680 polymorphisms have shown to have a strong association with neuroplasticity effect in schizophrenia. METHODS: Schizophrenia patients (n=32) with treatment resistant auditory hallucinations were administered with an add-on tDCS. The COMT (rs4680) and NRG1 (rs35753505) genotypes were determined. The COMT genotypes were categorised into Val group (GG; n=15) and Met group (GG/AG; n=17) and NRG1 genotypes were categorised into AA group (n=12) and AG/GG group (n=20). RESULTS: The reduction in auditory hallucination sub-scale score was significantly affected by COMT-GG genotype [Time×COMT interaction: F(1,28)=10.55, p=0.003, ɳ2=0.27]. Further, COMT-GG effect was epistatically influenced by the co-occurrence of NRG1-AA genotype [Time×COMT×NRG1 interaction: F(1,28)=8.09, p=0.008, ɳ2=0.22]. Irrespective of genotype, females showed better tDCS response than males [Time×Sex interaction: F(1,21)=4.67, p=0.04, ɳ2=0.18]. CONCLUSION: COMT-GG and NRG1-AA genotypes aid the tDCS-induced improvement in AVHs in schizophrenia patients. Our preliminary observations need replication and further systematic research to understand the neuroplastic gene determinants that modulate the effect of tDCS.

In male rats, the ability of central insulin to suppress glucose production is impaired by olanzapine, whereas glucose uptake is left intact.

BACKGROUND: Insulin receptors are widely expressed in the brain and may represent a crossroad between metabolic and cognitive disorders. Although antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, are the cornerstone treatment for schizophrenia, they are associated with high rates of type 2 diabetes and lack efficacy for illness-related cognitive deficits. Historically, this risk of diabetes was attributed to the weight gain propensity of antipsychotics, but recent work suggests antipsychotics can have weight-independent diabetogenic effects involving unknown brain-mediated mechanisms. Here, we examined whether antipsychotics disrupt central insulin action, hypothesizing that olanzapine would impair the well-established ability of central insulin to supress hepatic glucose production. METHODS: Pancreatic euglycemic clamps were used to measure glucose kinetics alongside a central infusion of insulin or vehicle into the third ventricle. Male rats were pretreated with olanzapine or vehicle per our established model of acute olanzapine-induced peripheral insulin resistance. Groups included (central-peripheral) vehicle-vehicle (n = 11), insulin-vehicle (n = 10), insulin-olanzapine (n = 10) and vehicle-olanzapine (n = 8). RESULTS: There were no differences in peripheral glucose or insulin levels. Unexpectedly, we showed that central insulin increased glucose uptake, and this effect was not perturbed by olanzapine. We replicated suppression of glucose production by insulin (clamp relative to basal: 77.9% ± 13.1%, all p < 0.05), an effect abolished by olanzapine (insulin-olanzapine: 7.7% ± 14%). LIMITATIONS: This study used only male rats and an acute dose of olanzapine. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study suggesting olanzapine may impair central insulin sensing, elucidating a potential mechanism of antipsychotic-induced diabetes and opening avenues of investigation related to domains of schizophrenia psychopathology.

Transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroplasticity genes: implications for psychiatric disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and well-tolerated brain stimulation technique with promising efficacy as an add-on treatment for schizophrenia and for several other psychiatric disorders. tDCS modulates neuroplasticity; psychiatric disorders are established to be associated with neuroplasticity abnormalities. This review presents the summary of research on potential genetic basis of neuroplasticity-modulation mechanism underlying tDCS and its implications for treating various psychiatric disorders. METHOD: A systematic review highlighting the genes involved in neuroplasticity and their role in psychiatric disorders was carried out. The focus was on the established genetic findings of tDCS response relationship with BDNF and COMT gene polymorphisms. RESULT: Synthesis of these preliminary observations suggests the potential influence of neuroplastic genes on tDCS treatment response. These include several animal models, pharmacological studies, mentally ill and healthy human subject trials. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the rapidly unfolding understanding of tDCS and the role of synaptic plasticity disturbances in neuropsychiatric disorders, in-depth evaluation of the mechanism of action pertinent to neuroplasticity modulation with tDCS needs further systematic research. Genes such as NRG1, DISC1, as well as those linked with the glutamatergic receptor in the context of their direct role in the modulation of neuronal signalling related to neuroplasticity aberrations, are leading candidates for future research in this area. Such research studies might potentially unravel observations that might have potential translational implications in psychiatry.

Safety of BEN guidelines in clozapine treatment: A Canadian perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Unidentified benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN) has been recognized as a factor contributing to clozapine underutilization and discontinuation. Guidelines were implemented to accommodate BEN in Canada, and our main objective was to evaluate clozapine's safety in a sample of Canadian psychiatric patients with BEN. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. Through the clozapine clinic registry, participants were identified who (i) received clozapine using the approved BEN guidelines for hematological monitoring, and (ii) had at least one complete blood count pre- and post-clozapine initiation. RESULTS: Our sample population was comprised of 41 BEN patients who were African-Caribbean (49 %), African (34 %), African-North American (12 %), Middle Eastern (2 %), and Indian-Caribbean (2 %). There was a significant reduction in hematological alerts for these patients while monitored under BEN guidelines (p < 0.001). The mean within-patient ANC value was not significantly different one year after clozapine initiation compared to the pre-clozapine baseline (p = 0.069). None of the patients discontinued clozapine for hematological reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated that patients monitored under the modified hematological guidelines for BEN can be safely treated with clozapine. These findings have important clinical ramifications as increased implementation of BEN guidelines may allow for broader use of clozapine.

Glucagon-like-peptide 1 receptor agonism and attempted suicide: A Mendelian randomisation study to assess a potential causal association.

Glucagon-like-peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have transformed type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity management. Multiple regulatory agencies are investigating reported associations between GLP1-RA and increased suicide attempts (SA), but observational data may be prone to confounding. Randomised control trials (RCT) of GLP-1RA were largely undertaken in people at lower risk of SA. Real-world data suggest semaglutide use associates with reduced suicidal ideation and depression but was under-powered to statistically assess risk of SA. Mendelian randomisation (MR) leverages genetic instrument(s) to infer potential causal association between an exposure and an outcome. We undertook MR using missense variants in the gene encoding GLP1R that improve glycemia, lower T2D risk and/or lower BMI, to investigate potential causal association between GLP-1RA and SA. In people of European ancestry, MR did not find evidence genetically proxied GLP1RA increased SA in a general population cohort: (rs10305492, exposure: HbA1c, odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38, 0.41-4.62, p = .60), (rs10305492, exposure: FG, OR 1.27, 0.52-3.13, p = .60) and (rs1042044, exposure BMI, OR 0.30, 0.06-1.48) with concordant results in a multi-ancestry SA case-control cohort. In conclusion, we did not find MR evidence that increased GLP-1RA impacts SA. This awaits confirmation with RCT and real-world data.