Usefulness of Von Willebrand Factor Activity Indexes to Predict Therapeutic Response in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Degraded by shear stress, loss of high-molecular-weight multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF) correlates strongly with pressure gradient in aortic stenosis (AS) and obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). We assessed VWF tests before and after interventions in HC and contrasted the severity of abnormalities in HC to patients with AS, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular assist devices. Ninety patients with median (interquartile range) age 66 (53 to 72) years, 51% men, with HC had assessments of 3 VWF parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide before and after 26 discreet medical/pacing interventions, 22 alcohol septal ablations, and 28 ventricular septal myectomies. VWF multimers were abnormal in 87% of patients with obstructive HC versus 48% of patients with latent obstruction (p = 0.0001). VWF measurements correlated with peak instantaneous left ventricular outflow tract gradient, Spearman ρ 0.51 to 0.61, p <0.0001. For B-type natriuretic peptide, correlation with left ventricular outflow tract gradient was weaker, ρ = 0.37, p = 0.0005, but stronger with septal thickness or mitral E/e'. In pre-/post-medical treatment of HC, VWF multimers were abnormal in 73%/68% of patients, p = 0.74; pre-/post-septal ablation 74%/26%, p = 0.0035; and pre-/post-septal myectomy 75%/0%, p <0.0001. In obstructive HC, the degree VWF multimer loss was greater than in severe AS or severe mitral regurgitation and overlapped that seen in left ventricular assist devices. In conclusion, VWF activity indexes were predictably abnormal in patients with HC with resting obstruction to a degree where bleeding could be anticipated, accurately reflected gradient changes after intervention, and demonstrated complete normalization after septal myectomy.

Survival After Lung Retransplantation in the United States in the Current Era (2004 to 2013): Better or Worse?

BACKGROUND: To understand the current patient survival after lung retransplantation (LRTx) in the United States, which has historically been worse compared with primary lung transplantation (LPTx). METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was retrospectively analyzed to determine survival after adult LRTx performed in 604 (2.48%) of 14,850 patients from 2004 to 2013. After exclusions, 582 LRTx and 13,673 LPTx recipients were selected for analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the prognosticators of survival after LRTx. Survival after LRTx and LPTx were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The median survival after LRTx was 2.6 years compared with 5.6 years after LPTx. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 71.1%, 46.3%, and 34.5% for LRTx, and 84.3%, 66.5%, and 53.3% for LPTx (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who had LRTx after a greater than 1-year interval survived longer (relative risk [RR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34% to 0.88%; p = 0.008). Lower survival was associated with single-lung transplantations (RR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.06% to 2.07%; p = 0.021), transplantations done between 2009 and 2013 (RR 1.40; CI, 1.01% to 1.94%; p = 0.041), multiple (>1) retransplantations (RR 2.55; 95% CI, 1.14% to 5.72%; p = 0.023), and recipients requiring pre-transplantation ventilator support. The only significant donor variable for poor survival was death due to cerebrovascular accidents (RR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.23% to 3.18%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival after LRTx in the United States has improved compared with historical data but remains lower than LPTx. Careful recipient selection and preoperative optimization based on the factors identified in our study may help utilize resources better and improve survival after LRTx. Bilateral LRTx should be preferentially performed as much as possible. Poor candidates for LRTx include those requiring retransplantations more than once or within 1 year. Prospective multi-institutional studies are necessary to help better understand the actual role of these factors in LRTx.

Postoperative rescue closure of patent foramen ovale in the clinical setting of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and stroke following coronary artery bypass surgery.

We describe a case of intraoperative diagnosis and successful deferred percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the clinical setting of acute refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure and new-onset ischemic stroke in an elderly patient after coronary artery bypass graft. Perioperative morbidity (i.e. severe hypoxemia, worsening right ventricular dysfunction, and embolic stroke) that is potentially related to intraoperatively diagnosed PFO during cardiac surgery can complicate management in the Intensive Care Unit and perhaps affect the patient's outcome. Although the PFO closure can be challenging in the clinical setting of hypoxemic respiratory failure and stroke following cardiac surgery, it can be a reasonable perioperative option.