The Algerian Arabic version of the Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR).

The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) is a new parent/patient-reported outcome measure that enables a thorough assessment of the disease status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We report the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the parent and patient versions of the JAMAR in the Algerian Arabic language. The reading comprehension of the questionnaire was tested in ten JIA parents and patients. Each participating centre was asked to collect demographic, clinical data and the JAMAR in 100 consecutive JIA patients or all consecutive patients seen in a 6-month period and to administer the JAMAR to 100 healthy children and their parents. The statistical validation phase explored descriptive statistics and the psychometric issues of the JAMAR: the three Likert assumptions, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha, interscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity). A total of 70 JIA patients (10.0% systemic, 35.7.0% oligoarticular, 21.4% RF negative polyarthritis, 32.9% other categories) and 70 healthy children, were enrolled in a paediatric rheumatology centre. The JAMAR components discriminated well healthy subjects from JIA patients. All JAMAR components revealed satisfactory psychometric performances. In conclusion, the Algerian Arabic version of the JAMAR is a valid tool for the assessment of children with JIA and is suitable for use both in routine clinical practice and clinical research.

Determinants of Discordance Between Criteria for Inactive Disease and Low Disease Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess concordance among criteria for inactive disease (ID) and low disease activity (LDA) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to seek factors driving discordance. METHODS: The frequency of fulfillment of existing criteria was evaluated in information on 10,186 patients extracted from 3 cross-sectional data sets. Patients were divided up according to the functional phenotypes of oligoarthritis and polyarthritis. Concordance between criteria was examined using weighted Venn diagrams. The role of each individual component in explaining discordance between criteria was assessed by calculating the absolute number and percentage of instances in which the component was responsible for discrepancy between definitions. RESULTS: Criteria for ID were met by 28.6-41.1% of patients with oligoarthritis and by 24.0-33.4% of patients with polyarthritis. Criteria for LDA were met by 44.8-62.4% of patients with oligoarthritis and by 44.6-50.4% of patients with polyarthritis. There was a 57.9-62.3% overlap between criteria for ID and a 67.9-85% overlap between criteria for LDA. Parent and physician global assessments and acute-phase reactants were responsible for the majority of instances of discordance among criteria for ID (8.7-15.5%, 10.0-12.3%, and 10.8-17.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: We found fair concordance between criteria for ID and LDA in JIA, with the main drivers of discordance for ID being physician and parent global assessments and acute-phase reactants. This observation highlights the need for further studies aimed to evaluate the impact of subjective physician and parent perception of disease remission and of laboratory measures of inflammatory activity on the definition of ID.