Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with risk of positive resection margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subsequent reoperation. Prior reports grossly underestimate the risk of margin positivity with IBC containing a DCIS component (IBC + DCIS) due to patient-level rather than margin-level analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to delineate the relative risk of IBC + DCIS compared with pure IBC (without a DCIS component) on margin positivity through detailed margin-level interrogation. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in which pathology databases were evaluated to identify patients who underwent BCS over 5 years (2014-2019). Margin-level interrogation included granular detail into the extent, pathological subtype and grade of disease at each resection margin. Predictors of a positive margin were computed using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Clinicopathological details were examined from 5454 margins from 909 women. The relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS versus pure IBC was 8.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.64-11.56) applying UK Association of Breast Surgery guidelines, and 8.44 (95% CI 6.57-10.84) applying the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines. Independent predictors of margin positivity included younger patient age (0.033, 95% CI 0.006-0.060), lower specimen weight (0.045, 95% CI 0.020-0.069), multifocality (0.256, 95% CI 0.137-0.376), lymphovascular invasion (0.138, 95% CI 0.068-0.208) and comedonecrosis (0.113, 95% CI 0.040-0.185). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pure IBC, the relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS is approximately ninefold, significantly higher than prior estimates. This margin-level methodology is believed to represent the impact of DCIS more accurately on margin positivity in IBC.

Streamlining Decision Making in Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Impact of PREDICT and BOADICEA Computations.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sporadic breast cancer (BC) have low contralateral breast cancer risk (CLBCR; approximately 0.7% per annum) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) offers no survival advantage. CPM with autologous reconstruction (AR) has major morbidity and resource implications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the impact of PREDICT survival estimates and lifetime CLBCR scores on decision making for CPM in patients with unilateral BC. METHODS: Of n = 272 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy and AR, 252 were included. Five- and 10-year survival was computed with the PREDICT(V2) online prognostication tool, using age and clinicopathological factors. Based on family history (FH) and tumor biology, CLBCR was calculated using validated BODICEA web-based software. Survival scores were correlated against CLBCR estimates to identify patients receiving CPM with 'low' CLBCR (< 30% lifetime risk) and poor prognosis (5-year survival < 80%). Patients with 'high' CLBCR receiving unilateral mastectomy (UM) were similarly identified (UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence [NICE] criteria for CPM, ≥ 30% lifetime BC risk). Justifications motivating CPM were investigated. RESULTS: Of 252 patients, 215 had UM and 37 had bilateral mastectomy and AR. Only 23 (62%) patients receiving CPM fulfilled the NICE criteria. Of 215 patients, 5 (2.3%) failed to undergo CPM despite high CLBCR and good prognosis. CPMs were performed, at the patient's request, for no clear justification (n = 8), contralateral non-invasive disease, and/or FH (n = 5), FH alone (n = 4) and ipsilateral cancer recurrence-related anxiety (n = 3). CONCLUSION: In the absence of prospective risk estimates of CLBCR and prognosis, certain patients receive CPM and reconstruction despite modest CLBCR, yet a proportion of patients with good prognoses and substantial risk are not undergoing CPM.

Patient-level costs of staged unilateral versus immediate bilateral symmetrization mammoplasty in breast-conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: Following therapeutic mammoplasty (TM), the contralateral breast may require a later balancing procedure to optimize shape and symmetry. The alternative is to offer patients simultaneous TM with immediate contralateral symmetrization via a dual-surgeon approach, with the goal of reducing costs and minimizing the number of subsequent hospital appointments in an era of COVID-19 surges. The aim of this cost-consequence analysis is to characterize the cost-benefit of immediate bilateral symmetrization dual-operator mammoplasty versus staged unilateral single operator for breast cancer surgery. METHOD: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted at an academic teaching centre for breast cancer surgery in the UK. Pseudonymized data for clinicopathological variables and procedural care information, including the type of initial breast-conserving surgery and subsequent reoperation(s), were extracted from the electronic patient record. Financial data were retrieved using the Patient-Level Information and Costing Systems. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and March 2020, 232 women received either immediate bilateral (n = 44), staged unilateral (n = 57) for breast cancer, or unilateral mammoplasty alone (n = 131). The median (interquartile range (i.q.r.)) additional cost of unilateral mammoplasty with staged versus immediate bilateral mammoplasty was €5500 (€4330 to €6570) per patient (P < 0.001), which represents a total supplementary financial burden of €313 462 to the study institution. There was no significant difference between groups in age, Charlson comorbidity index, operating minutes, time to adjuvant radiotherapy in months, or duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Synchronous dual-surgeon immediate bilateral TM can deliver safe immediate symmetrization and is financially beneficial, without delay to receipt of adjuvant therapy, or additional postoperative morbidity.

Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy versus non-skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing either conventional mastectomy without reconstruction (NSSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction. DATA SOURCES: All comparative studies published between 1997 and 2009 were used to evaluate local recurrence and distant relapse in the 2 study groups. REVIEW METHODS: Meta-analytical models were used to evaluate the study outcomes. Sensitivity analysis, was carried out to evaluate the robustness of the pooled estimates and assess the between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Nine studies, comprising of 3739 patients (1104 SSM and 2635 NSSM) were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the disease stage or the proportion of invasive cancers between groups (73.9% vs. 83.8%, P = 0.65). There was no significant difference in local recurrence between the SSM versus NSSM groups (7 studies, 3436 patients, 6.2% vs. 4.0%, odds ratio = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.81-1.94) and there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies. The SSM group had a lower proportion of distant relapses compared with the NSSM group (5 studies, 2122 patients, 10.0% vs. 12.7%, odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94) but this should be interpreted with caution since the grade of the tumors was not adequately reported in the studies considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in breast cancer patients, SSM was not significantly different from NSSM, in terms of rates of local recurrence. As no randomized control trial has addressed this question to date, the present meta-analysis reports the best evidence on the subject.

A case of Meigs syndrome mimicking metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adnexal masses are not uncommon in patients with breast cancer. Breast cancer and ovarian malignancies are known to be associated. In patients with breast cancer and co-existing pleural effusions, ascites and adnexal masses, the probability of disseminated disease is high. Nevertheless, benign ovarian masses can mimic this clinical picture when they are associated with Meigs' syndrome making the work-up and management of these patients challenging. To our knowledge, there are no similar reports in the literature and therefore we present this case to highlight this entity. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year old woman presented with a 4 cm, grade 2, invasive ductal carcinoma of her left breast. Pre-treatment staging investigations showed a 13.5 cm mass in her left ovary, a small amount of ascites and a large right pleural effusion. Serum tumour markers showed a raised CA125 supporting the malignant nature of the ovarian mass. The cytology from the pleural effusion was indeterminate but thoracoscopic biopsy failed to show malignancy. The patient was strongly against mastectomy and she was commenced on neo-adjuvant Letrozole 2.5 mg daily with a view to perform breast conserving surgery. After a good response to the hormone manipulation, the patient had breast conserving surgery, axillary sampling and laparoscopic excision of the ovarian mass which was eventually found to be a benign ovarian fibroma. CONCLUSION: Despite the high probability of disseminated malignancy when an ovarian mass associated with ascites if found in a patient with a breast cancer and pleural effusion, clinicians should be aware about rare benign syndromes, like Meigs', which may mimic a similar picture and mislead the diagnosis and management plan.

Microdochectomy for single-duct pathologic nipple discharge and normal or benign imaging and cytology.

This study evaluates microdochectomy as a means for diagnosis and treatment of patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) but with benign or normal imaging and cytology. From 1999 until 2006, in St. Mary's Hospital, 76 patients with the aforementioned condition underwent microdochectomy because of the presence of epithelial cells on nipple smear or for symptomatic relief. Most of the patients had intraductal papillomas (48.7%), duct ectasia (15.8%) or a combination of the two (13.2%). Other benign causes occurred in 11.8% of the patients. Eight patients, including one who was operated for symptomatic relief, had cancer. Of those patients with benign condition, 98% had symptomatic relief while PND recurred twice in one patient. Pre-operative workup and imaging may not be suspicious in patients with single-duct PND and underlying malignancy, therefore, microdochectomy should be considered in such cases.

Surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism: description of techniques and advances in the field.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a disease commonly seen in patients above 60 years of age. It is the most common cause of asymptomatic or symptomatic hypercalcemia, usually found incidentally on routine check-ups. Surgical treatment is the only definitive treatment of choice in the symptomatic patient; however, it can also be employed in asymptomatic patients. First described in 1925, bilateral neck exploration is the gold standard of treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. The recent interest in minimally invasive surgeries has led to better and improved techniques of neck exploration with improved cosmetic results and lesser chances of transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism due to inadvertent removal of normally functioning parathyroid tissue. These include unilateral neck explorations, minimally invasive parathyroidectomies and minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy. The intact parathyroid hormone assays have greatly added to the detection of normal and abnormal functioning glands, hence better surgical outcomes.

Patient attitudes towards undergoing additional breast biopsy for research.

BACKGROUND: Acquisition of additional breast tissue has become integral to breast oncology research. This questionnaire study examines patient willingness to undergo research-dedicated breast biopsies either at time of diagnostic biopsy (T1) or after carcinoma diagnosis has been confirmed and eligibility for a specific study established (T2), and influencing factors thereof. METHODS: Prior to consultation, patients attending breast clinics were recruited to complete a questionnaire examining willingness to undergo an extra fine needle aspirate (FNA) and/or core needle biopsy (CNB) for research either at T1 or T2. Descriptions of FNA and CNB procedures were supplied to those with no prior experience. Patient perspectives towards donating surplus tissue remaining from a diagnostic procedure and/or surgery for future research were also explored. FINDINGS: A total of 100 patients were recruited, 42% with prior history of breast carcinoma (BC), 22% with family history of BC (FHBC) and 65%/42% with previous experience of CNB/FNA respectively. Overall, 57% were willing to undergo additional biopsy at one or both time points. Willingness to undergo additional biopsy was greater for T1 than T2, but equivalent for CNB and FNA (willingness CNB T1, 50% vs T2, 26%, willingness FNA T1 50% vs T2 29%). A statistically significant increase in willingness to undergo CNB and/or FNA at T1 and/or T2 was seen in association with prior diagnosis of BC, FHBC, previous visit to breast clinic and prior experience of breast biopsy. 83% of patients expressed a willingness to allow surplus tissue to be stored in a biobank for future research. INTERPRETATION: Where possible patients should be approached to undergo baseline research biopsies at time of diagnostic process rather than subsequently. Patients do not find FNA more acceptable than core biopsy. Prior exposure to the biopsy procedure increases willingness to undergo research-dedicated biopsies.

A clinical "near miss" highlights risk management issues surrounding ultrasound-guided and wire-localised breast resections.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme has led to a considerable increase in the detection of impalpable breast cancer. Patients with impalpable breast cancer typically undergo oncological resection facilitated either by the insertion of guide wires placed stereo-tactically or through ultra-sound guided skin markings to delineate the extent of a lesion. The need for radiological interventions on the day of surgery adds complexity and introduces the risk that a patient may accidentally transferred to the operating room directly without the image guidance procedure. CASE REPORT: A case is described of a patient who required a pre-operative ultrasound scan in order to localise an impalpable breast cancer but who was accidentally taken directly to the operating theatre (OR) and anaesthetised without pre-operative intervention. The radiologist was called to the OR and an on-table ultrasound was performed without further consequence. CONCLUSION: It is evident that breast cancer patients undergoing image-guided resection are exposed to an additional layer of clinical risks. These risks are not offset by the World Health Organisation surgical safety checklist in its present guise. Here, we review a number of simple and inexpensive changes to the system that may improve the safety of the breast cancer patient undergoing surgery.

Recurrent acute pancreatitis as the first and sole presentation of undiagnosed primary hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: We highlight the pitfalls in delaying the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) in patients with acute pancreatitis as the sole clinical presentation. Primary hyperparathyroidism is a recognised, but rare, cause of acute pancreatitis. Hypercalcaemia caused by undiagnosed pHPT may be the only causative factor of recurrent acute pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients with multiple admissions for acute pancreatitis were diagnosed having pHPT during the work-up to identify possible causative factors. None of the patients had any other common predisposing factor for acute pancreatitis as revealed by clinical examination, blood tests and imaging. In retrospect, all had abnormally elevated calcium during previous admissions which was not further assessed. RESULTS: After diagnosis of pPTH, patients underwent bilateral neck exploration and parathyroidectomy. Histology confirmed parathyroid adenomas. The blood calcium level returned to normal and the patients remain well and asymptomatic after operation. CONCLUSIONS: The role of pHPT as a causative factor is underestimated when managing patients with acute pancreatitis, and frequently the underlying disease remains undiagnosed for a long time. Proper early diagnosis and management prevent unnecessary morbidity.

Breast conserving surgery with preservation of the nipple-areola complex as a feasible and safe approach in male breast cancer: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer in men is rare. The evidence about treatment has been derived from data on the management of the disease in women. The usual treatment is for male patients to undergo modified radical mastectomy. There is insufficient experience of breast conserving surgery with preservation of the nipple. The management of patients who demand such an approach for personal reasons remains a challenge for both the surgeon and oncologist. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man with a breast cancer was successfully managed with breast conserving surgery with nipple preservation combined with axillary clearance and postoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone treatment. Since there are no similar cases in the literature, we discuss the feasibility, safety and possible indications of such an approach. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited indications and evidence about the safety and efficacy of breast conserving surgery with nipple preservation in men with breast cancer, it is a feasible approach if other options are declined by the patient. More studies are necessary to reach firm conclusions about the safety of such an approach.

Diagnosis and management of male breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare with an incidence of 1% of all breast cancers. The evidence about the treatment is derived from the data on the management of the female breast cancer because conduction of randomized, controlled trials is impossible due to the rarity of the disease. In this study, we review the special features, overall management, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with MBC managed under our care with a brief review of the current literature. METHODS: During the period 1998 to 2006, we managed 1103 new patients with breast cancer in St Mary's Hospital. Among these, 14 patients were men. We retrospectively reviewed the case notes, histology, and follow-up notes of all the newly diagnosed patients with MBC. RESULTS: In this series, 28.6% had only in situ disease. Moreover, in 78.6% there was an in situ component present. One patient was found to have a cancer on the microdochectomy specimen after an operation for single duct nipple discharge, and in a second patient the cancer was found in the gynecomastia operation specimen. All ten invasive tumors were estrogen receptor positive (ER +ve), whereas eight were progesterone receptor positive (PgR +ve). With a median follow-up of 35 months, there was one locoregional recurrence and one disease-associated death. CONCLUSIONS: In situ cancer may not be as rare as previously reported among patients with MBC. Increased patient awareness and early assessment by a specialist is a key to early diagnosis and improved outcomes.

Surgical management of Gynaecomastia: outcomes from our experience.

The study aims to assess the morbidity and outcomes associated with gynaecomastia surgery. Between 1998 and 2007, 748 males with a mean age 44.67 years (10-90) were referred to us with breast-related symptoms. From these only 65 patients (102 breasts), with a median age of 26 years (11-82) had an operation for gynaecomastia. We considered for the purpose of the study each operated breast as an individual case. Overall, 42 cases of grade I gynaecomastia, 40 with grade II and 20 with grade III were treated mainly with subcutaneous mastectomies, 22 with skin reduction. Acute major complications requiring intervention occurred in 12 cases. Twenty-three cases required a late corrective operation for unsatisfactory results. The surgical approach appears to be the most important determinant of good cosmesis with the circumareolar approach to give the better results. The majority of the patients can be managed conservatively. Surgical candidates should be made aware of the significant morbidity.

Atypical anaphylactic reaction to Patent Blue during sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We present an unusual case of severe anaphylaxis to Patent Blue dye with atypical clinical features during sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The medical personnel involved with sentinel node biopsies should be alert, and familiar with this unusual entity. We also present current data from the literature. CASE REPORT: During a wide local excision for primary breast cancer and SLNB, and early during the operation, the patient became severely tachycardic and hypotensive without any signs of urticaria, rash, oedema, or bronchospasm. Resuscitation required the addition of noradrenaline infusion followed by an overnight admission to the intensive care unit. Raised serum tryptase levels supported the diagnosis of anaphylactic shock while skin tests showed a severe reaction to Patent Blue dye. CONCLUSIONS: Severe, life-threatening anaphylaxis to Patent Blue dye may present without obvious previous exposure to the dye and without the cardinal signs of oedema, urticaria and bronchospasm making the diagnosis and management of such cases challenging. Correct diagnosis and identification of the causative factor is important and requires a specific set of laboratory tests that are not commonly requested in every-day medical practice. It is not clear from the literature whether the condition is common enough to justify pre-operative prophylactic or diagnostic measures.