Secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa based on prior biologic exposure: an efficacy and safety analysis from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a substantial disease burden. Secukinumab has previously been reported to have sustained efficacy with a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. It is unknown whether prior biologic exposure affects the efficacy and safety of secukinumab. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS based on prior exposure to -biologics. METHODS: This was an analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized at baseline to receive secukinumab every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W), or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients on the SECQ2W and SECQ4W schedules remained on the same treatment regimen, while patients randomized to placebo were switched to either SECQ2W or SECQ4W up to week 52. Assessments based on prior exposure to biologics included Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count, flare rates, HS-related pain [numerical rating scale 30 (NRS30)], 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4-55), Dermatology Life Quality Index, EuroQol-5D and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 1084 patients were randomized in the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials and included in this analysis; 255 (23.5%) were biologic-experienced [SECQ2W (n = 80); SECQ4W (n = 81); placebo (n = 94)] and 829 (76.5%) were biologic-naïve [SECQ2W (n = 281); SECQ4W (n = 279); placebo (n = 269)]. At week 16, responses were more efficacious for secukinumab than for placebo with regard to HiSCR in patients who were biologic-experienced {SECQ2W 37.0% [odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-3.08]; SECQ4W 38.8% [OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.86-3.22]; placebo 27.3%} and biologic-naïve [SECQ2W 45.6% (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15-2.33); SECQ4W 45.4% (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.29); placebo 34.2%]. Similar results were observed for AN count, NRS30 and IHS4-55. The higher response seen at week 16 with secukinumab was sustained, with a trend toward improvement over time, through to week 52 in both subgroups. Additional efficacy was observed for quality-of-life assessments, and no differences in safety between subgroups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of prior biologic exposure, secukinumab was efficacious in improving the signs and symptoms of HS. This finding positions secukinumab as the first option in patients who are biologic-naïve, as well as in patients who have previously been treated with other biologic therapy, based on individual patient needs.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease that causes painful boils. HS is common and affects about 0.4% of the world's population. Treating the condition is difficult, but drugs called 'biologics' can help to improve the symptoms. For example, secukinumab is a biologic drug that has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of HS. In this analysis, we investigated whether previous treatment with biologics could affect the effectiveness and tolerability of secukinumab. This analysis included data from two identical clinical trials (called SUNSHINE and SUNRISE) that recruited adult patients with HS who had moderate-to-severe disease. In these trials, patients took secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 1 year, or a placebo for 4 months and then switched to secukinumab until 1 year. At regular intervals, the effectiveness and tolerability of secukinumab were examined and the results were compared between patients who had previously used another biologic and patients who had never used a biologic before. After 16 weeks, patients who took secukinumab had better results than the patients who took a placebo, independent of previous biologic use. Secukinumab was still effective and had improved results over 1 year of treatment in both subgroups. Regardless of whether patients had previously been taking another biologic, secukinumab was just as tolerable as placebo and there were no new safety risks. Our analysis shows that secukinumab is effective and tolerable, regardless of whether patients have previously used another biologic drug.

Once-Daily Crisaborole Ointment, 2%, as a Long-Term Maintenance Treatment in Patients Aged ≥ 3 Months with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) used reactively often fail to achieve lasting disease control; many of these therapies are associated with safety concerns that limit long-term use. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD that has potential as a long-term maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of crisaborole once daily (QD) compared to vehicle QD as a maintenance therapy to reduce the incidence of flares in patients with AD who previously responded to crisaborole twice daily (BID). METHODS: CrisADe CONTROL was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 52-week, phase III study of patients aged ≥ 3 months with mild-to-moderate AD involving ≥ 5% treatable body surface area. Eligible patients received crisaborole BID during an open-label run-in period of up to 8 weeks. Responders were randomly assigned in the double-blind maintenance period to receive either crisaborole QD or vehicle QD. Responders were defined as patients who achieved Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) success (ISGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥ 2-grade improvement) and ≥ 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index total score (EASI-50) from baseline. Patients who experienced a flare (ISGA score ≥ 2) during the double-blind maintenance period switched to crisaborole BID for up to 12 weeks. During this period, patients were assessed every 4 weeks; if the flare resolved (ISGA score ≤ 1), patients resumed their assigned treatment. The primary endpoint was flare-free maintenance until onset of the first flare. Key secondary endpoints were number of flare-free days, number of flares, and maintenance of pruritus response until onset of the first flare. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 497 patients entered the open-label run-in period with crisaborole BID, of which 270 patients were randomized into the 52-week double-blind maintenance period of the study. Of the 270 patients, 135 were randomly assigned to the crisaborole QD group and 135 were randomly assigned to the vehicle QD group. Median time of flare-free maintenance was longer for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (111 vs 30 days, respectively; p = 0.0034). The mean number of flare-free days was higher for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (234.0 vs 199.4 days, respectively; p = 0.0346). The mean number of flares was lower for patients who received crisaborole versus vehicle (0.95 vs 1.36, respectively; p = 0.0042). No clear trend was observed in maintenance of pruritus response between crisaborole- and vehicle-treated patients. Crisaborole was well tolerated, with no new or unexpected safety findings when used as maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Crisaborole QD was effective and well tolerated for long-term maintenance treatment and flare reduction in adult and pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04040192, 31 July 2019.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an immuno-inflammatory skin disease that can last a long time. It causes skin lesions and intense itching. Topical AD treatments used reactively often fail to control the disease over a long period of time. Many are associated with safety concerns that limit long-term use. Crisaborole ointment is a nonsteroidal treatment for the skin and is used to treat mild-to-moderate AD. Previous studies showed that using crisaborole twice daily was effective and had few side effects in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. This study evaluated how effective and safe long-term treatment with once-daily crisaborole was compared with an ointment with no drug (vehicle). The study included patients aged ≥ 3 months with mild-to-moderate AD whose AD improved after previous treatment with twice-daily crisaborole. This study was designed to investigate how much crisaborole reduced the incidence of AD flares over 52 weeks in these patients.The study included 270 patients whose AD had improved after treatment with twice-daily crisaborole. Of these patients, 135 were randomly assigned to receive crisaborole once a day and 135 to receive vehicle once a day. Patients who received crisaborole had a significantly longer time before experiencing AD flares than those who received vehicle. Crisaborole was well tolerated, and no new or unexpected side effects were found when used as a once-daily maintenance treatment for 52 weeks. These results indicate that once-daily treatment with crisaborole could be a potential long-term maintenance treatment option in children and adults with mild-to-moderate AD.

Enhanced Effectiveness of Adalimumab Compared to Topical/Traditional Systemic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from a Canadian Observational Epidemiologic Study (COMPLETE-PS).

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence is important for post-marketing evaluation. Data comparing adalimumab's effectiveness and safety with traditional therapies in clinical settings are currently lacking. The aim of this study was to compare real-world effectiveness of adalimumab versus topical/traditional systemic agents for management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis METHODS: Patients requiring change in treatment were enrolled between 2011 and 2016 and followed per routine care for up to 24 months. Achievement of Physician Global Assessment (PGA) ≤ 1.0 at 6 months was assessed with logistic regression; time to achievement was assessed using Cox regression. Additional outcomes were assessed using repeated measures mixed models. RESULTS: Patients receiving adalimumab (n = 293) versus topical/traditional systemic agents (n = 302) were more likely to achieve PGA ≤ 1.0 at 6 months (odds ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-4.30) in a shorter time (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.53-3.00), reporting both lower body surface area and improved quality of life and work productivity. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, adalimumab was more effective than topical/traditional systemic agents at reducing disease activity and improving quality of life outcomes among Canadians with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. (NCT00799877).