The MiniMed 780G automated insulin delivery system adapts to substantial changes in daily routine: Lessons from real world users during Ramadan.

AIM: To report on the effectiveness and safety of the MiniMed 780G automated insulin delivery system in real-world users during the month of Ramadan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CareLink Personal data were extracted from MiniMed 780G system users from the Gulf region. Users were included if they had ≥10 days of sensor glucose data during the month of Ramadan 2022 as well as in the month before and after. For the main analysis, continuous glucose monitoring endpoints were aggregated per month and were reported by time of day (daytime: 05.31-18.00 h, and night-time). Additional analyses were performed to study the pace at which the algorithm adapts. RESULTS: Glycaemic control was well kept in the 449 included users (mean sensor glucose = 152.6 ± 18.7 mg/dl, glucose management indicator = 7.0 ± 0.4%, time in range = 70.7 ± 11.0%, time below 70 mg/dl = 2.3 ± 2.3%). Albeit some metrics differed from the month before (p < .0001 for all), absolute differences were very small and considered clinically irrelevant. During Ramadan, there was no increased risk of hypoglycaemia during daytime (time below 70 mg/dl = 2.3 ± 2.4%), time in range was highest during daytime (80.0 ± 10.7%, night: 60.4 ± 15.3%), while time above 180 mg/dl was highest during night-time (37.3 ± 16.3%, day: 17.7 ± 10.7%). The algorithm adapted immediately upon lifestyle change. CONCLUSION: The MiniMed 780G automated insulin delivery system is effective, safe and fast in adapting to the substantial changes that occur in the lifestyle of people with type 1 diabetes during Ramadan.

Outcomes of Central Neck Dissection for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Primary Versus Revision Setting.

Introduction: Surgery in the central compartment after previous thyroidectomy involves an increased risk of injury to critical organs, including the parathyroids and recurrent laryngeal nerve. Contrastingly, primary central neck dissection involves a relatively low operative risk. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of central neck dissection in primary versus revision settings with respect to the lymph node yield and complication rates. Methods: This single-center prospective study included patients who underwent primary or revision neck dissection surgery for histologically confirmed thyroid malignancy between January 2018 and January 2022. Results: We included 30 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with primary central neck dissection and 29 patients who underwent central neck dissection following remote thyroidectomy with or without previous central dissection. There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative complications, including permanent hypocalcemia and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. However, both groups showed a significant postoperative decrease in calcium levels even though calcium and parathyroid hormone levels were within reference range. Conclusion: Although many surgeons fear revision central neck dissection, it appears to have similar therapeutic outcomes and complication rates as primary neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer. Specifically, there were no between-group differences in the lymph node yield, hypoparathyroidism, or recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Patients with normocalcemia showed a significant postoperative reduction in calcium levels, suggesting subclinical parathyroid insufficiency.