Subtyping primary aldosteronism by inconclusive adrenal vein sampling: A derivation and validation study in a tertiary centre.

OBJECTIVE: Indices based on aldosterone/cortisol (A/C) concentration in the successfully cannulated adrenal vein (AV) and in the inferior vena cava (IVC) (AV/IVC) appear to be possible markers to verify the subtype of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the case of inconclusive results of adrenal vein sampling (AVS). The variability of results in previous studies encouraged us to calculate AV/IVC and adrenal A/C cutoff values that could predict the aetiology of PA. METHODS: This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent AVS due to PA between 2015 and 2020. The derivation cohort ultimately consisted of 60 patients with bilaterally successful AVS and a clear diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral disease. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to find the optimal A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values predicting the subtype of PA. The validation cohort consisted of 11 patients with either unsuccessful cannulation or a borderline lateralization index (LI), those patients underwent adrenalectomy because their indices were suggestive of unilateral disease based on the derivation cohort data. RESULTS: The cutoff values of A/C ≤ 0.63 or AV/IVC ≤ 0.37 identified unaffected glands with a sensitivity of 91.2% and 97.1%, respectively, and a specificity of 90.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Unilateral ipsilateral gland involvement was characterized by A/C ≥ 3.5 or AV/IVC ≥ 3.4 with a corresponding specificity of 100%. All patients in the validation cohort achieved biochemical remission postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values could be a useful tool to determine the subtype of PA in patients with unilateral successful AVS as well as in patients with a borderline LI.

Open vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy for localized adrenocortical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) subjected to open vs laparoscopic surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: This retrospective study included 46 patients with the ACC ENSAT stage I-stage III of whom 23 underwent open surgery (OA group), whereas 23 were subjected to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA group). The main outcomes analysed in the study were differences between the OA and LA groups in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients in OA group had larger tumours (120 [70-250] mm vs 75 [26-110] mm; P < .001), higher Ki-67 index (16 [1-65] % vs 10 [1-25] %; P = .04) and higher disease stage (P = .01) compared with the patients in the LA group. The median duration of follow-up for patients underwent OA and LA was 51 (12-174) and 53 (5-127) months, respectively. Eight patients (5 OA and 3 LA) experienced recurrent disease, whereas six patients (3 OA and 3 LA) died during follow-up. No differences in RFS and OS were found between patients who underwent open or laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that in patients with localized ACC and without invasion of extra-adrenal tissues, LA is a plausible treatment option in terms of RFS and OS. However, our results are limited to referral centres with large experience in the management of patients with ACC and may not necessarily apply to nonspecialized centres.