The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of apocynin and paeonol, APPA, in symptomatic knee OA: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Apocynin (AP) and paeonol (PA) are low molecular weight phenolic compounds with a broad array of anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. This study assessed of a fixed-dose combination of APPA in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2a trial enrolled participants with radiographic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence, KL, grades 2-3) and pain ≥40/100 on WOMAC pain subscale, and evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral APPA over a 28-day period. APPA 800 mg or matching placebo was administered twice daily in a 1:1 ratio. Post-hoc analyses explored the response to APPA in sub-groups with more severe pain and structural severity. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable at baseline; 152 subjects were enrolled and 148 completed the trial. There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to the primary outcome, WOMAC pain (mean difference between groups was -0.89, 95% CI: -5.62, 3.84, p = 0.71), nor WOMAC function or WOMAC total. However, predefined subgroup analyses of subjects with symptoms compatible with nociplastic/neuropathic pain features showed a statistically significant effect of APPA compared to placebo. Adverse events (mainly gastrointestinal) were mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Treatment with APPA 800 mg twice daily for 28 days in subjects with symptomatic knee OA was not associated with significant symptom improvement compared to placebo. The treatment was well-tolerated and safe. While the study was not powered for such analysis, pre-planned subgroup analyses showed a significant effect of APPA in subjects with nociplastic pain/severe OA, indicating that further research in the effects of APPA in appropriate patients is warranted.

A Phase 2b double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of SB-061, an aggrecan mimetic, in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of a novel aggrecan mimetic, SB-061, in subjects with knee OA. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II study comparing intra-articular injections of SB-061 with placebo (isotonic saline) for 52 weeks, administered at baseline, Wk 16, and Wk 32. Eligible subjects had a KL grade of 2 or 3 on X-ray of the target knee and a WOMAC pain score ≥20 out of 50 at screening and baseline visits. Subjects having any other knee condition were excluded. Use of analgesics was prohibited, except for rescue medication. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in WOMAC pain at Week 8. Secondary endpoints were CFB in WOMAC function and total, ICOAP, PGA, and 20-meter walk test. Exploratory endpoints included structural CFB in MRI entities. RESULTS: 288 subjects were randomized to SB-061 (n=145) or placebo (n=143), and 252 (87.5%) completed injections. The groups were comparable at baseline. The primary endpoint was not met, as no significant difference in the CFB of the WOMAC pain score at Week 8 between groups was observed, nor at any other time point during the study. Similarly, neither of the secondary or exploratory endpoints indicated any significant difference between groups. The frequency and type of adverse events was similar between groups. SB-061 was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injections of SB-061 administered at baseline, Wk 16, and Wk 32, over one year in subjects with knee OA was safe but did not show any statistically significant effect on knee pain nor on other symptomatic or structural entities compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER EUDRACT NO: 2019-004515-31.

Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Additional therapies are needed for prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Abaloparatide is a selective activator of the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, 80 µg, vs placebo for prevention of new vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporotic fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Abaloparatide Comparator Trial In Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE) was a phase 3, double-blind, RCT (March 2011-October 2014) at 28 sites in 10 countries. Postmenopausal women with bone mineral density (BMD) T score ≤-2.5 and >-5.0 at the lumbar spine or femoral neck and radiological evidence ≥2 mild or ≥1 moderate lumbar or thoracic vertebral fracture or history of low-trauma nonvertebral fracture within the past 5 years were eligible. Postmenopausal women (>65 y) with fracture criteria and a T score ≤-2.0 and >-5.0 or without fracture criteria and a T score ≤-3.0 and >-5.0 could enroll. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded, daily subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 821); abaloparatide, 80 µg (n = 824); or open-label teriparatide, 20 µg (n = 818) for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was percentage of participants with new vertebral fracture in the abaloparatide vs placebo groups. Sample size was set to detect a 4% difference (57% risk reduction) between treatment groups. Secondary end points included change in BMD at total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine in abaloparatide-treated vs placebo participants and time to first incident nonvertebral fracture. Hypercalcemia was a prespecified safety end point in abaloparatide-treated vs teriparatide participants. RESULTS: Among 2463 women (mean age, 69 years [range, 49-86]), 1901 completed the study. New morphometric vertebral fractures occurred less frequently in the active treatment groups vs placebo. The Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate for nonvertebral fracture was lower with abaloparatide vs placebo. BMD increases were greater with abaloparatide than placebo (all P < .001). Incidence of hypercalcemia was lower with abaloparatide (3.4%) vs teriparatide (6.4%) (risk difference [RD], −2.96 [95%CI, −5.12 to −0.87]; P = .006). [table: see text]. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, the use of subcutaneous abaloparatide, compared with placebo, reduced the risk of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 18 months. Further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of RD, the risks and benefits of abaloparatide treatment, and the efficacy of abaloparatide vs other osteoporosis treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01343004.

Strontium ranelate reduces the urinary level of cartilage degradation biomarker CTX-II in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Strontium ranelate significantly decreases the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether strontium ranelate (2 g/day) also affects cartilage brakedown as measured by urinary marker of cartilage degradation, designated CTX-II. METHODS: A subgroup of 2617 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (aged 75.7+/-4.4 years) were selected from the TROPOS phase III study on the basis of a urinary sampling reported at each visit during the first three years of the study. When included in TROPOS, they were randomized to strontium ranelate or placebo in a double-blind fashion for 3 years. A calcium and vitamin D supplement was also provided to the subjects during the study. A marker of collagen type II degradation (CTX-II) corrected for urinary creatinine (CTX-II/cr.) was assessed at regular intervals throughout the study in 1310 patients in strontium ranelate group and 1307 patients in placebo group. RESULTS: The response in CTX-II depended on time (p<0.0001), and this time dependency differed statistically significantly between groups (time x treatment) (p<0.0003). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between treatments (p<0.0001). The difference in the response of CTX-II/cr. appeared already after three months, with the strontium ranelate-treated subjects having approximately 15-20% lower values than the placebo-treated subjects for the remaining study period (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with strontium ranelate significantly decreases urinary excretion of CTX-II, a marker of cartilage destruction. Further studies are warranted to investigate an effect on cartilage formation and symptoms of osteoarthritis.

Disassociation of bone resorption and formation by GLP-2: a 14-day study in healthy postmenopausal women.

We have previously shown that a single subcutaneous injection of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) at 10 p.m. in postmenopausal women results in a dose-dependent decrease in the nocturnal serum and urine concentrations of fragments derived from the degradation of the C-terminal telopeptide region of collagen type I (s-CTX and u-CTX) and u-DPD, markers of bone resorption. In contrast, bone formation, as assessed by serum osteocalcin and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), appeared to be unaffected by treatment with exogenous GLP-2. These effects were further investigated in a 14-day study. The aim was to demonstrate that a parenteral formulation of GLP-2 is safe and well tolerated after repeated dosing in healthy postmenopausal women for 14 days. It was further investigated whether the effects on bone turnover markers were sustained throughout the study period. The study was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 60 postmenopausal women and 2 different doses of GLP-2 (1.6 mg and 3.2 mg GLP-2) against a saline control. The data for bone resorption revealed a similar reduction on Day 1 and Day 14, both based on time course and AUC. There were no signs of tachyphylaxis and no serious adverse reaction. Both GLP-2 doses resulted in similar and significant (p<0.001) reduction in bone resorption indicating that the maximum efficacious dose has been approached. Osteocalcin and PINP levels were unaffected at Day 1 and Day 14, suggesting a disassociation between bone resorption and bone formation during GLP-2 treatment.

Enlarged waist combined with elevated triglycerides is a strong predictor of accelerated atherogenesis and related cardiovascular mortality in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Upward trends of obesity urge more effective identification of those at cardiovascular risk. A simple dichotomous indicator, enlarged waist (> or =88 cm) combined with elevated triglycerides (> or =1.45 mmol/L) (EWET), was shown to offer advantages in identifying individuals with atherogenic "lipid overaccumulation" compared with other indicators, including the metabolic syndrome defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (MS-NCEP). Whether EWET offers superior disease and event prediction in postmenopausal women, however, remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A community-based sample of 557 women (48 to 76 years of age) were followed up for 8.5+/-0.3 years to assess the utility of EWET and MS-NCEP in estimating the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and the annual progression rate of aortic calcification. At baseline, 15.8% of women had EWET and 17.6% had MS-NCEP. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were increased in carriers of the dichotomous indicators (P<0.001). After adjustment for age, smoking, and LDL cholesterol, presence of EWET was associated with a 4.7-fold (95% CI, 2.2 to 9.8; P<0.001) increased risk and presence of MS-NCEP was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI, 1.5 to 6.5; P<0.001) increased risk for fatal cardiovascular events. Exclusion of women with prevalent diabetes did not change these trends; respective hazard ratios were 4.2 (95% CI, 1.9 to 9.3; P<0.001) and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.5; P<0.05). Among those who were discordant for EWET and MS-NCEP at baseline, those who had EWET alone (n=21) had a higher annual progression rate of aortic calcification compared with those who had MS-NCEP alone (n=31; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combined presence of EWET may be the best indicator of cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women. Other components of the MS-NCEP add little medical value to screening in general practices.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women taking calcium and vitamin D.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of oral calcitonin (SMC021) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 4665 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to receive calcium and vitamin D plus either SMC021 tablets (0.8mg/d) or placebo for 36months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture. The two groups were well balanced at baseline with regards to demographic and clinical data. No effect of SMC021 on preventing new vertebral fractures was observed, nor was any effect seen on new hip or non-vertebral fractures. Women receiving SMC021 had a mean 1.02% (±0.12%) increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) compared with a mean 0.18% (±0.12%) increase in the placebo group by the end of the study (p<0.0001). Similarly, small increases in BMD were observed at the femoral neck and hip in both groups. Levels of the biomarkers of bone turnover, urinary CTX-I and CTX-II, were 15% lower in the SMC021 group than in the placebo arm at 12 and 24months, but not at 36months. No change in quality of life between groups, assessed by the Qualeffo-14 questionnaire, was observed in either group between baseline and month 36. Pharmacokinetics analysis confirmed exposure to SMC021, but the drug levels were markedly lower than expected. Approximately 92% of subjects in each treatment group experienced an adverse event (AE), the majority of which were mild or moderate in intensity. AEs associated with SMC021 were primarily of gastrointestinal origin and included nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, as well as hot flushes which were the reason for the slightly higher drop-out rate in the active treatment arm compared to placebo. The number of severe AEs was low in both groups. Thirty-five deaths were reported but none were considered treatment-related. Due to the lack of efficacy in preventing fractures, the development of the orally formulated calcitonin was terminated despite the promising results in earlier studies.

Non-isomerized C-telopeptide fragments are highly sensitive markers for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy in Paget's disease of bone.

UNLABELLED: A new resorption assay measuring non-isomerized collagen type I C-telopeptide fragments (alpha-alpha CTX) was evaluated in a cohort comprising 32 Pagetic patients and 48 healthy controls. alpha-alpha CTX was found to be a sensitive marker for assessing disease activity and monitoring treatment efficacy in Paget's disease of bone compared with isomerized CTX (beta-beta CTX) and a number of other established bone turnover markers. INTRODUCTION: Collagen type I fragments are generated by resorbing osteoclasts, and some of them can be measured using a C-telopeptide (CTX) immunoassay. The C-telopeptide of collagen type I comprises a DG-motif susceptible to isomerization. In newly synthesized collagen, this motif is in the native form denoted alpha, but spontaneously converts to an isomerized form (beta) during aging of bone. CTX fragments composed of at least two alpha CTX chains (alpha-alpha CTX) originating from degradation of newly formed bone can be determined in the urine using a newly developed sandwich ELISA. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of this marker to monitor disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with Paget's disease compared with established bone turnover markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients diagnosed with Paget's disease of bone was included in the study. All received 400 mg/day of oral tiludronate for 3 months. Urinary alpha-alpha CTX (U alpha-alpha CTX) was measured at baseline and at 1 and 6 months after discontinuation of therapy and in 48 untreated age-matched and healthy controls. Other markers of bone turnover, including urinary beta-beta CTX, N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, and deoxypyridinoline, were also measured for comparison. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The U alpha-alpha CTX marker showed a marked reduction (-82% and -77% at 1 and 6 months of treatment, respectively) in response to antiresorptive therapy in patients with Paget's disease. The response to treatment in this marker exceeded that of the other markers (p < 0.01). The alpha-alpha CTX marker also provided a high correlation (r = 0.89) to disease activity as assessed by scintigraphic activity index. In conclusion, alpha-alpha CTX seems to be a sensitive marker for assessing disease activity and monitoring treatment efficacy in Paget's disease.

Peripheral adiposity exhibits an independent dominant antiatherogenic effect in elderly women.

BACKGROUND: Although several lines of evidence point to an atherogenic role of central fat mass (CFM), few data are available to address the specific role played by peripheral fat mass (PFM). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of 1356 women aged 60 to 85 years. Study variables were physical measures, CFM and PFM measured by DEXA, aortic calcification (AC) graded on lateral radiographs, lipid and glucose metabolites, blood pressure, and information on lifestyle factors and coronary disease. Peripheral fat mass showed independent negative correlation with both atherogenic metabolic risk factors and AC (P<0.001). The most severe insulin resistance-dyslipidemic syndrome and AC (score 5.10+/-0.76) was found in women with high central fat percentage (CF%, 21.7+/-0.2%) and low peripheral fat percentage (PF%, 18.3+/-0.2%, n=48). The least severe AC (score 2.45+/-0.31) was found in obese women with high CF% (21.6+/-0.1%) and high PF% (27.3+/-0.14%, n=112). The insulin resistance-dyslipidemic syndrome was also less severe compared with those with the same CF% but low PF%. The most favorable metabolic profile characterized women with low CF% (11.56+/-0.16%) and high PF% (26.86+/-0.33%, n=44). In women with a history of myocardial infarct (18.41+/-0.55%, n=45), CF% was significantly higher compared with women with no manifest coronary disease (16.48+/-0.12%, n=1210) without differences in PF%. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly women, localization of fat mass is apparently more important for atherosclerosis than obesity per se; although CFM is associated with atherogenic tendencies, PFM seems to exhibit an independent dominant antiatherogenic effect.

Novel associations between bioavailable estradiol and adipokines in elderly women with different phenotypes of obesity: implications for atherogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral adiposity confers protection against diabetes and atherosclerosis in elderly women. The underlying mechanisms, however, remain to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: On the basis on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of central fat mass (CFM) and peripheral fat mass (PFM), we identified 290 elderly women with distinct forms of body fat distribution (lean, peripheral obesity, central obesity, or general obesity). Study parameters were plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, adiponectin, estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin resistance, and aortic calcification, graded on lateral radiography. In peripherally and generally obese women, plasma estradiol and insulin resistance were significantly lower, whereas sex hormone-binding globulin and adiponectin were significantly higher compared with centrally obese women independent of age, body mass index, total fat mass, and smoking habits (all P<0.05). After adjustment for these confounders, IL-6 in centrally obese women was comparable with that seen in generally obese (similar high CFM%) but significantly higher than in peripherally obese women and lean women (low CFM%). Atherosclerosis was less severe in generally obese (2.5+/-0.3) compared with centrally obese women (5.0+/-0.7, P=0.001). In multiple regression analysis, total fat mass, body fat distribution, insulin resistance, estradiol, current smoking, treated hyperlipidemia, and treated hypertension contributed independently to the variation of aortic calcification (R=0.55, SEE=3.60, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Abundant presence of PFM in generally obese women is associated with increased plasma adiponectin and higher insulin sensitivity, which could explain the apparent protection against the atherogenic effects of IL-6 derived from CFM. Low peripheral exposure to estradiol appears to be a sine qua non of maintained adiponectin secretion from PFM.

Oral salmon calcitonin induced suppression of urinary collagen type II degradation in postmenopausal women: a new potential treatment of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 3 months of oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) on cartilage degradation as estimated by the changes in the urinary excretion of C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (CTX-II), and to investigate whether the response of oral sCT to urinary CTX-II depends on the baseline level of cartilage turnover. METHODS: This was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical setting including 152 Danish postmenopausal women aged 55-85. The subjects received treatment with the different doses of sCT (0.15, 0.4, 1.0, or 2.5 mg) combined with Eligen technology-based carrier molecule (200 mg), or placebo for 3 months. The efficacy parameter was the changes in the 24-h excretion of urinary CTX-I/II corrected for creatinine excretion at month 3. RESULTS: sCT induced a significant dose-dependent decrease in 24-h urinary CTX-II excretion. Similar dose-dependent responses were found in 24-h urinary CTX-I. When stratifying the study population into tertiles of baseline urinary CTX-II, the present osteoarthritic symptoms and definite cases of osteoarthritis (OA) were significantly more frequent in women in the highest tertile of CTX-II (mean 391 +/- 18 ng/mmol). Women who received 1.0 mg of sCT and had the highest cartilage turnover presented the greatest decrease in urinary CTX-II after 3 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: In addition to its pronounced effect on bone resorption, this novel oral sCT formulation may also reduce cartilage degradation and thereby provide therapeutic benefit in terms of chondroprotection. Women with high cartilage turnover are more likely to benefit from oral sCT treatment.

Early postmenopausal hormone therapy may prevent cognitive impairment later in life.

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen deficiency has been implicated as a risk factor for cognitive impairment in elderly women, yet the role of hormone therapy (HT) to prevent this event remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of administration of HT for 2 to 3 years in the early postmenopausal years on the risk of cognitive impairment 5 to 15 years later. DESIGN: We followed a group of 343 women who had received HT in randomized, placebo-controlled trials and were reexamined 5, 11, or 15 years after completion of therapy. Of these women, 261 received either HT or placebo for 2 to 3 years during the trials with no further hormone treatment until follow-up, and the remaining 82 women reported either prolonged or current use of HT at reexamination. Outcome of the study was cognitive function assessed by the short Blessed test that includes tests of orientation, concentration, and memory function on a scale of 0 to 28 (score > or =6 indicates cognitive impairment). RESULTS: The mean age of participants at follow-up was 65 +/- 3 years. There was no difference in the mean cognitive scores between ever HT users and never users. For women who received 2 to 3 years of HT, the risk of cognitive impairment (cognitive score > or =6) was decreased by 64% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15-0.90; P = 0.03). A similar OR was found in long-term/current HT users. Adjustment for age, alcohol intake, current smoking, and education did not alter the results. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that previous short-term HT administered in the early phase of the menopause may provide a long-term protection against cognitive impairment.

Safety and efficacy of a novel salmon calcitonin (sCT) technology-based oral formulation in healthy postmenopausal women: acute and 3-month effects on biomarkers of bone turnover.

UNLABELLED: Oral administration of calcitonin could improve compliance to long-term treatment. Efficacy and safety of a novel oral formulation was assessed on 277 postmenopausal women. The results show (1) effective enteral absorption, (2) marked inhibition of bone resorption with minimal alteration of formation, and (3) reproducibility of responses over 3 months. INTRODUCTION: We have recently introduced an Eligen technology-based oral formulation of salmon calcitonin (sCT) that effectively delivers the hormone to the circulation. The efficacy and safety during longer-term administration, however, has not been investigated in the target population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial including 277 healthy postmenopausal women 55-85 years of age. Women received treatment with either daily (0.15, 0.4, 1.0, or 2.5 mg) or intermittent doses (1.0 mg, every other day) of sCT combined with the delivery agent (8-[N-2-hydroxi-5-chloro-benzoyl]-amino-caprylic acid, 200 mg) or placebo for 3 months. All participants received 1,000 mg calcium plus 400 IU vitamin D daily throughout the study. Efficacy parameters were the acute and/or pre-dose changes in serum and urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), N-mid osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP), calcium, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) measured by established immunoassays. RESULTS: After the first dose, sCT evoked dose-dependent decreases in serum CTx (-60.8% to -81.8% from baseline) compared with placebo, reaching nadirs 2-3 h after drug intake, after which, gradual increases were observed. The simultaneous acute changes in OC were statistically nonsignificant. Area under the curve (AUC) of serum CTx responses at months 1 and 3 showed strong correlation with those at baseline (both r = 0.78, p < 0.001). At month 3, the placebo-corrected changes in the pre-dose value of serum and urinary CTx were significant only in the 1.0-mg dose group (-18.9% and -20.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). The placebo-corrected change in OC was -8.6 (p = 0.09), whereas the change in BSALP was -7.3 (p = 0.02). The oral formulation was well tolerated, with mild to moderate gastrointestinal and skin manifestations apparent mainly in the high-dose groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this 3-month trial show that the novel Eligen technology-based oral formulation of sCT has potential to become a safe and effective treatment for postmenopausal bone loss. Future trials are needed to assess the impact of long-term administration on changes in BMD and fracture risk.

Role of gastrointestinal hormones in postprandial reduction of bone resorption.

UNLABELLED: Collagen type I fragments, reflecting bone resorption, and release of gut hormones were investigated after a meal. Investigations led to a dose escalation study with glucagon like peptide-2 (GLP-2) in postmenopausal women. We found a dose-dependent effect of GLP-2 on the reduction of bone resorption. INTRODUCTION: The C-terminal telopeptide region of type I collagen as measured in serum (s-CTX) can be used to assess bone resorption. This marker of bone resorption has a significant circadian variation that is influenced by food intake. However, the mediator of this variation has not been identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the release of the gut hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2; a representative of the intestinal proglucagon-derived peptides) after ingestion of glucose, fat, protein, and fructose, as well as their effects after parenteral administration in relation to bone turnover processes in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we studied the effect on bone turnover of a single subcutaneous injection of GLP-2 in four different dosages (100, 200, 400, or 800 microg GLP-2) or placebo in 60 postmenopausal women (mean age, 61 +/- 5 years). RESULTS: All macronutrients significantly (p < 0.05) reduced bone resorption as assessed by s-CTX (39-52% from baseline), and only the glucagon-like peptides were secreted in parallel. Parenteral administration of GIP and GLP-1 did not result in a reduction of the s-CTX level, whereas GLP-2 caused a statistically significant and dose-dependent reduction in the s-CTX level from baseline compared with placebo (p < 0.05). Urine DPD/creatinine, a marker of bone resorption, was significantly reduced by 25% from baseline in the 800-microg GLP-2 group (p < 0.01). An area under the curve (AUC(0-8h)) analysis for s-CTX after GLP-2 injection confirmed the dose-dependent decrease (ANOVA, p = 0.05). The s-osteocalcin level was unaffected by the GLP-2 treatment. CONCLUSION: These studies exclude both GIP and GLP-1 as key mediators for the immediate reduction in bone resorption seen after a meal. The dose-dependent reduction of bone resorption markers found after subcutaneous injection of GLP-2 warrants further investigation into the mechanism and importance of GLP-2 for the bone turnover processes.

Alendronate has a residual effect on bone mass in postmenopausal Danish women up to 7 years after treatment withdrawal.

Alendronate has been shown to reduce bone turnover and increase bone mass. However, little is known about the duration of the effect on bone after treatment withdrawal. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover of various alendronate regimens after treatment withdrawal. In this study, we followed 203 postmenopausal women who previously participated in two alendronate randomized placebo-controlled trials. Daily oral treatment with various doses of alendronate (2.5-20 mg) were given for 2, 4, or 6 yr followed by no treatment for 7, 5, or 3 yr, respectively. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were induced serum C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) and osteocalcin. Women who received alendronate (2.5-10 mg per day) for 2 yr had a 3.8% higher BMD compared to those receiving placebo when assessed 7 yr after withdrawal. The residual effect was proportionally larger in women who had received treatment for 4 (5.9%, P=0.02) or 6 yr (8.6%, P=0.002), respectively. However, the largest residual effect was found in women treated with alendronate 20 mg per day for 2 yr (9.7%, P=0.01 vs. placebo). The rate of bone loss after alendronate withdrawal was comparable to the bone loss observed in the placebo group. Bone markers tended to reverse back to normal levels, but were still affected even several years after withdrawal of treatment. This study has demonstrated that the efficacy of alendronate in preventing bone loss was proportional to the duration of treatment. The rate of bone loss after withdrawal of alendronate corresponded to the normal postmenopausal rate of bone loss. A residual effect on BMD was found up to 7 yr after treatment withdrawal.

Two to three years of hormone replacement treatment in healthy women have long-term preventive effects on bone mass and osteoporotic fractures: the PERF study.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is often prescribed for a few years to suppress menopausal symptoms. Although its long-term use of HRT for the primary prevention of osteoporosis is not currently recommended, the long-term skeletal benefits of the limited therapy are of great interest. To determine whether administration of HRT for 2-3 years in the early postmenopausal years provides long-term benefits, such as prevention of bone loss and osteoporotic fractures, we studied a group of 347 healthy postmenopausal women with normal bone mass who had earlier completed one of four placebo-controlled HRT trials and who were reexamined 5, 11, or 15 years after stopping HRT. Of these women, 263 received either HRT or placebo for 2-3 years with no further bone-sparing treatment until follow-up, and the remaining 84 women reported either prolonged or current use of HRT at reexamination. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine (L1-L4) and bone mineral content (BMC) in the forearm were measured at baseline, the end of the trials, and follow-up. At follow-up, we assessed the radiological presence of vertebral fracture and collected information on the new incidence of nonvertebral fractures. Compared with that of the placebo-treated women, the BMD and BMC of HRT-treated women continued to show significantly higher values (>5%) even many years after stopping HRT. After stopping treatment, the rate of bone loss returned to normal postmenopausal rates. The preservation of bone mass in the HRT group was accompanied by a significantly reduced risk of all osteoporotic fractures as compared with the placebo group [OR = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.26-0.88)]. 'Fast losers' on placebo had more than a 4-fold higher risk of fractures than had the women on limited HRT with a normal rate of bone loss after withdrawal. In conclusion, limited HRT administered in the early postmenopausal years offers long-lasting benefits for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss and osteoporotic fracture.

Reduction of nocturnal rise in bone resorption by subcutaneous GLP-2.

We have previously shown that a subcutaneous injection of glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) at 9 a.m. in fasting postmenopausal women results in a dose-dependent decrease in the serum concentration of fragments derived from the degradation of the C-terminal telopeptide region of collagen type I (s-CTX), a marker of bone resorption. In contrast, GLP-2 was found to have a neutral effect on bone formation, as assessed by serum osteocalcin. Since increased s-CTX levels are normally observed at night, we conducted bedtime studies in healthy postmenopausal women. The objective was to study the effect of GLP-2 injection on bone turnover given at bedtime. A total of 81 postmenopausal women were included in two randomised placebo-controlled studies. In conclusion, we found a dose-related reduction of s-CTX after injection of GLP-2 (P < 0.05) and osteocalcin levels was increased as compared to placebo (P = 0.07) by the treatment, suggestive of a stimulative effect on bone formation. An area under the curve (AUC0-10 h) analysis for s-CTX after GLP-2 injection confirmed the dose-related decrease as compared to placebo (P < 0.05).

The aging male: testosterone deficiency and testosterone replacement. An up-date.

The significance of the age-related decline of androgens remains unclear in terms of cardiovascular risk, mood and cognition, and prostatic health. Although much research has been undertaken in this area and men's health has received still more attention in the latest years, there are no data based on randomized controlled clinical studies in aging men investigating the long-term effects of androgen replacement therapy on various aspects of the cardiovascular system, the immune system, body composition, and the brain. In men receiving long-term androgen replacement therapy, the safety aspects regarding the prostate are also an area of clinical importance. In this paper we present an up-dated review of the experimental and clinical evidence of androgen deficiency and androgen replacement therapy on carbohydrate metabolism, on coagulation and fibrinolysis, inflammatory effects, effects on lipoprotein metabolism, direct arterial effects, effects on body composition, effects on cognitive function and mood, and prostatic effects. The evidence clearly shows that data for the most part are conflicting, with only very few randomized studies available.

Changes in bone density and turnover after alendronate or estrogen withdrawal.

OBJECTIVE: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover changes after therapy withdrawal in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate or estrogen-progestin. DESIGN: In this randomized, blinded, multinational, placebo-controlled trial, 1,609 healthy postmenopausal women ages 45 to 59 years were assigned to receive alendronate, placebo, or open-label estrogen-progestin (conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate or a cyclic regimen of 17 beta-estradiol, norethisterone acetate and estradiol). Of the original women, one third after year 2 and one third after year 4 were switched from alendronate to placebo, while remaining blinded to treatment assignment. The women taking estrogen-progestin in years 1 to 4 were followed off therapy in years 5 and 6. BMD at the lumbar spine and hip and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured. RESULTS: The treatment groups described in the current report represent 860 women at baseline; 481 women entered year 5, and 430 completed 6 years. BMD steadily decreased in the placebo group during all 6 years. In contrast, spine and hip BMD increased during the first 4 years in the groups receiving daily continuous alendronate 5 mg and estrogen-progestin. During years 5 and 6, BMD decreased at the lumbar spine -2.42% (95% CI = -4.10, -0.74) and total hip -1.09% (-2.60, 0.41) in the group previously treated with alendronate 5 mg for 4 years. In comparison, large BMD decreases were observed at the spine [-7.69% (-8.96, -6.41)] and total hip [-5.16% (-6.30, -4.01)] among women who had received estrogen-progestin for 4 years. CONCLUSION: Alendronate produces greater residual skeletal effects than estrogen-progestin after therapy discontinuation.