Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Cancer ; 118(15): 3793-800, 2012 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22139816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtype. Little is known about the incidence and trends for this disease in the United States. METHODS: Twenty-year data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were used for this study. SEER*Stat was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 95,797 cases of NHL diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 in 9 SEER registries, 1835 (1.9%) were new cases of WM. Median age at diagnosis of WM was 73 years. The overall annual age-adjusted incidence was 0.38 per 100,000 persons per year, which increased with age, ranging from 0.03 in patients aged <50 years to 2.85 in patients aged ≥80 years. The incidence of WM was higher in men (0.54) than in women (0.27; P < .001) and was higher in whites (0.41) than in African Americans (0.18) or other races (0.21; P < .05). The annual percentage change for the whole population was 1.01% (P > .05). The annual percentage change was 1.21% for whites (P < .05) and 0.80% (P > .05) for nonwhites. Significant annual percentage change increases were seen in the group aged 70 to 79 years (1.24%; P < .05) and in 3 geographic registries (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall incidence of WM remained steady over time, significant increases in incidence were seen over the past 20 years in whites, in those aged 70 to 79 years, and in 3 geographic registry areas.


Asunto(s)
Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/etnología , Población Blanca
3.
Cancer ; 117(19): 4468-74, 2011 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21437886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to review the outcome of patients with solitary plasmacytoma (SP) after definitive radiation therapy. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with SP who were diagnosed and treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during 1988 to 2008. The impact of tumor anatomic site, tumor size, and the presence of serum and urinary paraprotein at diagnosis was assessed on local control, survival, and the risk of developing multiple myeloma (MM). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (70%) had bone SP, and 25 patients (30%) had extramedullary SP. Serum paraprotein was present in 39 patients (46%). The median radiation dose was 45 grays (Gy) (range, 36-53.4 Gy). Local control was achieved in 77 patients (92%). Neither radiation dose nor tumor size predicted local control. The 5-year rate of progression to MM was 47% and was higher for patients with bone SP (56% vs 30% for extramedullary SP; P = .021), and patients who had serum paraprotein detected at diagnosis (60% vs 39%; P = .016). On univariate analysis, patients aged <60 years and men had higher rates of progression to MM, although the differences were not significant (P = .048 and P = .29, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that bone location and serum protein at diagnosis were associated statistically with progression to MM. The 5-year overall survival rate for the entire patient cohort was 78%, and no difference was observed between patients who had bone SP versus extramedullary SP (76% vs 85%, respectively; P = .274). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that definitive radiation therapy for SP can provide excellent local control. Progression to MM remains the main problem and is more common among patients with bone SP and those who have serum paraprotein detected at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico , Paraproteínas/metabolismo , Paraproteínas/orina , Plasmacitoma/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/sangre , Neoplasias Óseas/etiología , Neoplasias Óseas/orina , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/etiología , Mieloma Múltiple/orina , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/sangre , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/orina , Plasmacitoma/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 19(9): 560-569, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) usually follows a clinical course leading to refractoriness and limited treatment options in advanced stages, which might need bridge therapies to either autologous stem cell transplantation or novel therapies. We report our experience with the high-dose chemotherapy mCBAD (modified cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) regimen in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), and plasma cell leukemia (PCL) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched our electronic records database for MM patients who received mCBAD from 2010 to 2016 for 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) twice daily with mesna 400 mg/m2 I.V. daily (days 1-4), bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously/I.V. (days 1, 4, 8, 11), doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 daily continuous infusion (days 1-4), dexamethasone 40 mg orally daily (on days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20). International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria were used for response assessment and diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, χ2, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier were used for statistical purposes. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients met the inclusion criteria. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered. The overall response rate was 85% in patients with RRMM (n = 116) and 100% in NDMM (n = 13) and PCL (n = 11) patients. Respective median progression-free survival (mPFS) for NDMM, PCL, and RRMM were 19.61 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.26 to not applicable [NA]), 7.56 months (95% CI, 4.7 to NA), and 4.64 months (95% CI, 3.75-6.73). Patients with RRMM who used mCBAD as a bridge to autologous transplant (36.2%) had mPFS (11.48 months; 95% CI, 7.52-15.9 months) compared with those who did not (mPFS: 3.19 months; 95% CI, 2.4-3.75 months). Cytopenias occurred in more than 90% of patients, and febrile neutropenia was noted in 26%. All cases of treatment-related mortality (8%) occurred in patients with RRMM, except for 1 patient with PCL. CONCLUSION: mCBAD results in high response rates in myeloma and PCL, however, with high treatment-related mortality. Its use in RRMM should be limited to patients who have immediate need for therapy without other treatment options and who have good performance status (score of 0-1) or NDMM if novel agents are not available depending on practice setting. mCBAD can be a treatment option for patients with PCL.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Leucemia de Células Plasmáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia de Células Plasmáticas/diagnóstico , Leucemia de Células Plasmáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Proyectos de Investigación , Retratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Br J Haematol ; 143(4): 537-40, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18783399

RESUMEN

The Clinical Response and Efficacy Study of Bortezomib in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Myeloma (CREST) demonstrated substantial activity with two dose levels of bortezomib (1.0 and 1.3 mg/m(2)), alone or with dexamethasone, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We present updated survival analyses after prolonged follow-up (median >5 years). One- and 5-year survival rates were 82% and 32%, respectively, in the 1.0 mg/m(2) group (n = 28), and 81% and 45%, respectively, in the 1.3 mg/m(2) group (n = 26). Notable survival, response, and time-to-progression data suggest that a bortezomib starting dose of 1.3 mg/m(2) is preferred. If bortezomib dose reduction is required, the 1.0 mg/m(2) dose still offers patients a substantial survival benefit.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
N Engl J Med ; 348(26): 2609-17, 2003 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12826635

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib, a boronic acid dipeptide, is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has been shown in preclinical and phase 1 studies to have antimyeloma activity. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 2 trial, we enrolled 202 patients with relapsed myeloma that was refractory to the therapy they had received most recently. Patients received 1.3 mg of bortezomib per square meter of body-surface area twice weekly for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week without treatment, for up to eight cycles (24 weeks). In patients with a suboptimal response, oral dexamethasone (20 mg daily, on the day of and the day after bortezomib administration) was added to the regimen. The response was evaluated according to the criteria of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and confirmed by an independent review committee. RESULTS: Of 193 patients who could be evaluated, 92 percent had been treated with three or more of the major classes of agents for myeloma, and in 91 percent, the myeloma was refractory to the therapy received most recently. The rate of response to bortezomib was 35 percent, and those with a response included 7 patients in whom myeloma protein became undetectable and 12 in whom myeloma protein was detectable only by immunofixation. The median overall survival was 16 months, with a median duration of response of 12 months. Grade 3 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (in 28 percent of patients), fatigue (in 12 percent), peripheral neuropathy (in 12 percent), and neutropenia (in 11 percent). Grade 4 events occurred in 14 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib, a member of a new class of anticancer drugs, is active in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma that is refractory to conventional chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Complejos Multienzimáticos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteasas/uso terapéutico , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Cisteína Endopeptidasas , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Proteasas/efectos adversos , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia
7.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma ; 7 Suppl 4: S139-44, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17562251

RESUMEN

In recent years, there have been major advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Among previously untreated patients, different combinations of dexamethasone, lenalidomide, thalidomide, and bortezomib have produced overall response rates of 80%-90% with complete response rates of 10%-32%, and remissions are often achieved after only 2 cycles of initiating systemic therapy. Subsequent intensification with high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation has enabled younger patients to achieve partial and complete responses with evidence of prolonged survival. Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation and reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation are under investigation in attempts to improve outcomes. For patients unable to pursue consolidation therapy with stem cell transplantation, remissions obtained with induction therapy can often be extended with the use of maintenance systemic therapy. Despite available therapies, relapse of disease is inevitable for nearly all patients, and treatment strategies with novel agents and novel combinations of established agents are under study.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(1): 16-9, 2003 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12506164

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity of thalidomide in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma and of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated symptomatic myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with previously untreated asymptomatic myeloma were treated with thalidomide 100 to 200 mg orally (PO) at bedtime (qhs) with serial increments of 50 to 100 mg at weekly intervals, as tolerated to a maximum of 600 mg PO qhs. Forty consecutive previously untreated patients with symptomatic myeloma were also treated as above (maximum dose 400 mg) and received dexamethasone 20 mg/m(2) for 4 days beginning on days 1, 9, and 17; the second and third cycles of repeated dexamethasone were begun on day 30. Both groups of patients were treated for at least 3 months. RESULTS: The response rate was 36% for patients treated with thalidomide alone and 72% for patients treated with thalidomide-dexamethasone, the latter including complete remission in 16% of patients. The median time to remission was 4.2 months with thalidomide alone and 0.7 months with thalidomide-dexamethasone. Grade 3 toxicity included infections (nine patients) and thrombotic/embolic events (seven patients). Five deaths have occurred as a result of multiple myeloma (two patients), infection (one patient), unknown cause (one patient), and a possible thromboembolic event (one patient). CONCLUSION: Thalidomide alone was effective in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. The combination with dexamethasone induced a high frequency of response, rapid onset of remission, and low incidence of serious irreversible toxicity. These observations support further studies of this promising combination for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos
10.
Haematologica ; 90(1): 117-25, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15642678

RESUMEN

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma which produces monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). Over the last decade, new treatment modalites have been developed for the management of this disorder. Our objective is to provide treatment recommendations for WM. A review of published reports was facilitated by a MEDLINE computer search and by a manual search of Index Medicus. Other sources included abstracts and conference proceedings. Most patients with WM who are diagnosed by chance without symptoms should not be treated. Initiation of treatment should not be based on level of serum monoclonal protein per se. The presence of cytopenia, significant adenopathy or organomegaly, symptomatic hyperviscosity, severe neuropathy or cryoglobulinemia indicates the need for treatment. The main choices for primary treatment of symptomatic patients with WM include alkylating agents, the nucleoside analogs fludarabine or cladribine and the monoclonal antibody rituximab or combinations of these programs. There are no data from prospective randomized studies to recommend the use of one program over another. Nevertheless, the need for rapid disease control may favor the use of nucleoside analogs, whereas the presence of significant cytopenia may favor rituximab. High dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation may induce responses even in patients with resistance to all three class of agents. It may be prudent to avoid nucleoside analogs in patients who are candidates for high dose therapy. Despite the lack of randomized trials, a rational approach to the treatment of patients with WM is possible. Several factors, including the presence of cytopenias, need for rapid disease control, candidacy for autologous stem cell transplantation, age and co-morbid conditions, should be taken into consideration when choosing the most appropriate primary treatment.


Asunto(s)
Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Plasmaféresis , Esplenectomía , Trasplante de Células Madre , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/cirugía
11.
Semin Hematol ; 40(4 Suppl 4): 3-7, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15015890

RESUMEN

Both thalidomide and intermittent high-dose dexamethasone are agents with established activity against multiple myeloma. We summarized our experience with thalidomide alone, and then in combination with dexamethasone, for groups of patients with myeloma resistant or relapsing despite standard treatments. Criteria of response were based on greater than 50% reduction of serum myeloma protein and/or greater than 75% reduction of Bence Jones protein for patients treated with thalidomide alone and greater than 75% reduction of serum myeloma protein and/or greater than 90% reduction of Bence Jones protein for those who received thalidomide with dexamethasone. Among patients with resistant or relapsing disease treated with a combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone, 47% of patients achieved remission with significant prolongation of survival for responsive patients. Among patients in stable partial remission after intensive therapy who received the same program, myeloma protein was reduced further by greater than 90% in 52% of patients who had not received prior thalidomide/dexamethasone. Side effects were frequent, mild and reversible, and often preventable. Our program of thalidomide/dexamethasone was a safe and effective combination for patients with resistant or relapsing disease, or as consolidation of partial remission after intensive therapy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Inducción de Remisión , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
12.
Semin Oncol ; 30(2): 243-7, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12720145

RESUMEN

Treatment for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) has usually been reserved for symptomatic patients and has included alkylating agent-steroid combinations and, more recently, nucleoside analogues. We now describe our experience with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) alone and in combination at our center. We treated 90 consecutive, previously untreated patients with symptomatic WM using either 2-CdA alone or in combination with other agents including prednisone (pred), cyclophosphamide (Cy), and rituximab (Rit) as follows: January 1991 to December 1992- 2-CdA 0.1 mg/kg by continuous infusion (CI) over 24 hours for days (16 patients); December 1992 to December 1995-2-CdA 0.1 mg/kg CI over 24 hours for 7 days plus pred 60 mg/m(2) orally daily for 7 days (20 patients); July 1996 to March 1998-2-CdA 1.5 mg/m(2) by subcutaneous injection (SC) every 8 hours for 7 days plus Cy 40 mg/m(2) orally twice daily for 7 days (37 patients); August 1999 to December 2001-2-CdA 1.5 mg/m(2) SC every 8 hours for 7 days plus Cy 40 mg/m(2) orally twice daily for 7 days plus Rit 375 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion (IV) weekly for 4 weeks (17 patients). For nearly all patients, a second course was repeated after at least 6 weeks. Responding patients were monitored without further treatment until relapse. Overall response (complete [CR] + partial response [PR]) was 94% for 2-CdA alone, 60% for 2-CdA/pred, 84% for 2-CdA/Cy, and 94% for 2-CdA/Cy/Rit. Median overall survival is 73 months for 2-CdA, 41 months for 2-CdA/pred, and has not been reached for 2-CdA/Cy or 2-CdA/Cy/Rit. Cause-specific survival for 2-CdA/pred is 78 months and has not been reached for all other programs. The only poor prognostic factor for cause-specific survival was hemoglobin < 9 g/dL. 2-CdA regimens provide excellent response rates and improve cause-specific survival, with minimal treatment and little toxicity. These observations support the potential role of 2-CdA regimens as the treatment of choice for previously untreated WM.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cladribina/uso terapéutico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cladribina/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Rituximab , Análisis de Supervivencia , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/sangre
13.
Semin Oncol ; 30(2): 116-20, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12720119

RESUMEN

This presentation represents consensus recommendations on prognostic markers and criteria to initiate therapy in patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), which were prepared in conjunction with the Second International Workshop held in Athens, Greece during September 2002. The panel recommended that initiation of therapy should not be based on the IgM level per se since this may not correlate with the clinical manifestations of WM. The consensus panel agreed that initiation of therapy was appropriate for patients with constitutional symptoms such as recurrent fever, night sweats, fatigue due to anemia, or weight loss. The presence of progressive, symptomatic lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly provide additional reasons to begin therapy. The presence of anemia with a hemoglobin value of

Asunto(s)
Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/diagnóstico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anemia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Enfermedades Linfáticas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Esplenomegalia , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/mortalidad , Pérdida de Peso , Microglobulina beta-2/metabolismo
14.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 45(10): 2057-61, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15370250

RESUMEN

Recent data have suggested that rituximab is an active agent for the treatment of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). However, the patients that are more likely to benefit have not been clearly defined. In order to address this question we evaluated 52 patients who were treated with single-agent rituximab in the context of prospective studies. Several clinical and laboratory variables were assessed for their correlation with response and time to progression. Twenty-three (44%) patients achieved a partial response after treatment with rituximab. Previously untreated and pretreated patients had the same probability for response. Higher response rates were noted in patients with serum monoclonal protein < 40 g/l, with serum albumin > or = 35 g/l and with kappa light chain. The median time to progression for all patients was 13.8 months. A multivariate analysis indicated that elevated serum monoclonal protein levels and low serum albumin were the dominant variables associated with shorter progression. Presence of two, one or none of these adverse prognostic factors was associated with time to progression of 3.6 months, 11 months and more than 40 months, respectively. We conclude that rituximab is an effective treatment modality for patients with WM. Patients with both low levels of monoclonal protein and normal albumin are the best candidates for treatment with standard dose rituximab.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Proteínas Sanguíneas/efectos de los fármacos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Rituximab , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/patología
15.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 45(4): 755-9, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15160952

RESUMEN

The goal of this trial was to assess the toxicity and potential efficacy of high-dose topotecan, melphalan and cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Eighteen patients were treated, 8 for first remission consolidation, 4 with relapse sensitive disease, 3 primary refractory and 3 relapsed refractory. The median age was 56 (38 - 65) and the median number of prior regimens was 3 (1 - 8). Patients received cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2/d on days -6, -5, -4; melphalan 70 mg/m2 on days -3, -2 and topotecan 3.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d on days -6 to -2. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on day 0. Toxicity (Bearman Toxicity Criteria) was mostly limited to grade 1 - 2 mucositis and grade 1 diarrhea. There were no transplant-related deaths. The overall response rate at 3 months post transplantation was 89% with 17% CR, 2 of those in refractory patients. The overall response rate in refractory patients was 67%. With a median follow up of 12.3 months, 89% of patients are alive. The TMC regimen is well tolerated and produces high response rates. Further evaluation of TMC to fully assess response and survival is ongoing.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/toxicidad , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Proyectos Piloto , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Topotecan/administración & dosificación , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Hematol Oncol ; 7: 41, 2014 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24886772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This single-arm study evaluated feasibility, safety, and initial efficacy of electroacupuncture for thalidomide/bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) in cancer patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: Patients with neuropathy ≥ grade 2 received 20 acupuncture treatments over 9 weeks. RESULTS: For the 19 evaluable patients, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG/NTX) mean (SD) scores improved significantly between baseline and week 13 (20.8 [9.6] vs 13.2 [8.5], p = 0.0002). Moderate effect size differences began on week 4, with the largest effect size differences found at week 9 for FACT/GOG/NTX scores, worst pain in the last 24 hours, and pain severity (Cohen's d = 1.43, 1.19, and 1.08, respectively) and continuing through week 13 (Cohen's d = 0.86, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively). From baseline to week 13, additional significant improvements were seen as follows: postural stability (1.0 [0.6] vs 0.8 [0.4], p = 0.02); coin test (10.0 [7.4] vs 5.6 [1.9], p < 0.0001); button test (96.1 [144.4] vs 54.9 [47.3], p < 0.0001); and walking test (21.6 [10.0] vs 17.2 [7.7], p = 0.0003). No significant changes were seen with NCS. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture may help patients experiencing thalidomide- or bortezomib-induced PN. Larger, randomized, clinical trials are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00891618.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Electroacupuntura/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/terapia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 13(2): 119-22, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23260599

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: In an effort to maintain high primary response rates against multiple myeloma and without serious toxicity, we assessed 3 different bortezomib combinations in small numbers of patients, with combinations that included cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide in modest doses and for short courses. Remissions occurred in approximately 90% of patients, with rare episodes of serious drug-related adverse effects. BACKGROUND: Recent bortezomib combinations have induced remission in approximately 90% of patients newly diagnosed, with moderate frequency of adverse effects. PATIENTS: In an attempt to reduce adverse effects, and to prepare qualified patients for early intensification, we assessed the antimyeloma effect and toxicity of 3 different bortezomib combinations in small numbers of patients. METHODS: With reduced doses and short durations of exposure, we combined bortezomib with (a) cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone, (b) lenalidomide/dexamethasone/liposomal doxorubicin, and (c) cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone/lenalidomide. RESULTS: Response rates were high, with rare episodes of severe drug-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Further study of similar combinations of effective drugs given in limited doses and for short durations would be useful.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Bone Marrow Res ; 2012: 916479, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22675638

RESUMEN

Among 792 patients with multiple myeloma treated from 1987 to 2010 and assessed after 18 months, there were 167 patients with complete remission. For those 60 patients treated between 1987-1998 and with long followup, the latest relapse occurred after 11.8 years, so that 13 patients have remained in sustained complete remission for longer than 12 years (range 12-22 years). These results suggest that 3% of all patients treated during that period may be cured of multiple myeloma. In addition to immunofixation, more sensitive techniques for the detection of residual disease should be applied more consistently in patients with apparent complete remission in order to identify those with potential cure.

20.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 35(6): 562-5, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21694573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In vitro studies have shown synergistic antimyeloma effects with the combination of bortezomib and alkylating agents. Combinations of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone are rational with the prospect of superior antitumor activity with independent toxicity. METHODS: Between December 2004 and April 2007, we treated 44 patients with relapsing multiple myeloma with the combination of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, 11; dexamethasone 20 mg/m orally daily for 4 days beginning on days 1, 9 and 17; and cyclophosphamide 70 mg/m orally twice daily for 4 days. A second course was given 1 month later. RESULTS: Clinical response was observed in 32 patients (73%) including 26 with disease in partial remission (59%), and 6 with disease in complete remission (14%). Side effects were uncommon and mild, except for grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 15%, infection in 5% and constipation in 2% of patients. The median remission time of responding patients was 10 months that contributed to significantly longer median survival for patients with responsive disease (33 mo) than for those with unresponsive disease (12 mo) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone was an effective, well-tolerated combination for the treatment of relapsing multiple myeloma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA