Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
2.
Lancet ; 362(9397): 1721-3, 2003 Nov 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14643122

RESUMEN

Asylum seekers arriving in the USA are likely to be held in detention for months or years pending adjudication of their asylum claims. We interviewed 70 asylum seekers detained in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. We used self-report questionnaires to assess symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. At baseline, 54 (77%) participants had clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, 60 (86%) of depression, and 35 (50%) of post-traumatic stress disorder; all symptoms were significantly correlated with length of detention (p=0.004, 0.017, and 0.019, respectively). At follow-up, participants who had been released had marked reductions in all psychological symptoms, but those still detained were more distressed than at baseline. Our findings suggest detention of asylum seekers exacerbates psychological symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Emigración e Inmigración/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental , Refugiados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Refugiados/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Evaluación de Necesidades , Estados Unidos
3.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 26(4): 383-5, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14567286

RESUMEN

Asylum seekers arriving in the United States are often imprisoned for months or years while their asylum claims are processed. Recently, Physicians for Human Rights and the Bellevue/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture released the findings of the first systematic study examining the health of detained asylum seekers. The study found that the mental health of asylum seekers interviewed was extremely poor, including high levels of symptoms for anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder, which worsened the longer individuals were in detention. The study also raises concerns about the manner in which asylum seekers are treated upon arrival in the United States and then while in detention. These findings support assertions that detention has a harmful effect on the health and well-being of asylum seekers. Policies regarding the long-term detention of asylum seekers should be reconsidered.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Derechos Humanos , Prisioneros/psicología , Política Pública , Refugiados/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Humanos , Refugiados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aislamiento Social , Sobrevivientes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Affect Disord ; 151(1): 78-84, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23787406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of group interventions for adults with mental distress in post-conflict settings is less clear in sub-Saharan Africa. AIM: To assess the impact of group counseling intervention on depression, post-traumatic stress and function outcomes among adults attending the Peter C. Alderman Foundation (PCAF) trauma clinics in northern Uganda. METHODS: 631 War affected adults were enrolled into PCAF trauma clinics. Using a quasi-experimental design, assessments were conducted at baseline, at 3 and 6 months following initiation of care. Multivariate longitudinal regression models were used to determine change in depression, post-traumatic stress and function scores over time among group counseling participants and non-participants. RESULTS: In comparison to non-participants, participants had faster reduction in depression scores during the 6-month follow-up period [ß=-1.84, 95%CI (-3.38 to -0.30), p=0.019] and faster reduction in post-traumatic stress scores during the 3-month follow-up period [ß=-2.14, 95%CI (-4.21 to -0.10), p=0.042]. At 3-month follow up, participants who attended two or more sessions had faster increase in function scores [ß=3.51, 95%CI (0.61-6.40), p=0.018] than participants who attended only one session. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias due to the use of non-random samples. Substantial attrition rates and small sample sizes may have resulted in insufficient statistical power to determine meaningful differences. CONCLUSION: The group counseling intervention offered in the PCAF clinics may have considerable mental health benefits over time. There is need for more research to structure, standardize and test the efficacy of this intervention using a randomized controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Consejo/métodos , Depresión/terapia , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uganda
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA