Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(5): 1460-1467, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Overuse of antimicrobials in residents of long-term care homes is common and can result in harm. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed in the long-term care (LTC) homes setting to improve the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Previous literature has highlighted the importance of documenting antimicrobial indication as a strategy that contributes to improve antimicrobial use; however, there is a lack of evidence in LTC homes. This study examines the prevalence, clarity, and facility-level variability of antibiotic indication documentation in this setting. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study of oral antibiotic prescriptions dispensed to 218 homes between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Indication was obtained from reviewing antibiotic prescription data. Clarity was determined by comparing documented indication to the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS). Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the prevalence and clarity of indication documentation. Funnel plots were generated to examine variability in prevalence of indication documentation and clarity at the home level. RESULTS: Overall, 22.9% (7998/34,867) of prescriptions had an indication documented. The proportion of indications that were clear was 37% (2984/7998). The most common indications were for urinary (45%), skin and soft tissue (19.9%) and respiratory infections (15.0%). At the home level, the median prevalence of indication was 19.6% (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.8%-31.4%) and median prevalence of clear indications was 35.1% (IQR: 23.8%-42.9%). Funnel plots revealed substantial variability in indication prevalence with 46.3% of homes falling outside of 99% limits but minimal variability in indication clarity between homes with only 8.7% of homes outside of 99% control limits. CONCLUSIONS: There is an opportunity to increase both the prevalence and clarity of antibiotic prescriptions in LTC homes. Future work should focus on determining how best to support prescription indication documentation in this setting with consideration being given to prescription workflow and most common antibiotic prescription indications.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Documentación , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Casas de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ontario/epidemiología , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA