Electrical stimulation thresholds differ between V1 and V2.

Cortical visual prostheses are designed to treat blindness by restoring visual perceptions through artificial electrical stimulation of the primary visual cortex (V1). Intracortical microelectrodes produce the smallest visual percepts and thus higher resolution vision - like a higher density of pixels on a monitor. However, intracortical microelectrodes must maintain a minimum spacing to preserve tissue integrity. One solution to increase the density of percepts is to implant and stimulate multiple visual areas, such as V1 and V2, although the properties of microstimulation in V2 remain largely unexplored. We provide a direct comparison of V1 and V2 microstimulation in two common marmoset monkeys. We find similarities in response trends between V1 and V2 but differences in threshold, neural activity duration, and spread of activity at the threshold current. This has implications for using multi-area stimulation to increase the resolution of cortical visual prostheses.

Microstimulation-evoked neural responses in visual cortex are depth dependent.

BACKGROUND: Cortical visual prostheses often use penetrating electrode arrays to deliver microstimulation to the visual cortex. To optimize electrode placement within the cortex, the neural responses to microstimulation at different cortical depths must first be understood. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how the neural responses evoked by microstimulation in cortex varied with cortical depth, of both stimulation and response. METHODS: A 32-channel single shank electrode array was inserted into the primary visual cortex of anaesthetized rats, such that it spanned all cortical layers. Microstimulation with currents up to 14 µA (single biphasic pulse, 200 µs per phase) was applied at depths spanning 1600 µm, while simultaneously recording neural activity on all channels within a response window 2.25-11 ms. RESULTS: Stimulation elicited elevated neuronal firing rates at all depths of cortex. Compared to deep sites, superficial stimulation sites responded with higher firing rates at a given current and had lower thresholds. The laminar spread of evoked activity across cortical depth depended on stimulation depth, in line with anatomical models. CONCLUSION: Stimulation in the superficial layers of visual cortex evokes local neural activity with the lowest thresholds, and stimulation in the deep layers evoked the most activity across the cortical column. In conjunction with perceptual reports, these data suggest that the optimal electrode placement for cortical microstimulation prostheses has electrodes positioned in layers 2/3, and at the top of layer 5.