Diastolic Dysfunction Following Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Incidence and Predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity represents a major limitation for the use of anthracyclines or trastuzumab in breast cancer patients. Data from longitudinal studies of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in this group of patients are scarce. The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence, evolution, and predictors of DD in patients with breast cancer treated with anthracyclines. METHODS: This analytical, observational cohort study comprised 100 consecutive patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CHT) for breast cancer. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiogram, and measurement of cardiac biomarkers at baseline, end of anthracycline-based CHT, and at 3 months and 9 months after anthracycline-based CHT was completed. Fifteen patients receiving trastuzumab were followed with two additional visits at 6 and 12 months after the last dose of anthracycline-based CHT. A multivariate analysis was performed to find variables related to the development of DD. Fifteen of the 100 patients had baseline DD and were excluded from this analysis. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up (median: 12 months, interquartile range: 11.1-12.8), 49 patients (57.6%) developed DD. DD was persistent in 36 (73%) but reversible in the remaining 13 patients (27%). Four patients developed cardiotoxicity (three patients had left ventricular systolic dysfunction and one suffered a sudden cardiac death). None of the patients with normal diastolic function developed systolic dysfunction during follow-up. In the logistic regression model, body mass index (BMI) and age were independently related to the development of DD, with the following odds ratio values: BMI: 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.36), and age: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.03-1.19). Neither cardiac biomarkers nor remaining clinical variables were predictors of DD. CONCLUSION: Development of diastolic dysfunction after treatment with anthracycline or anthracycline- plus trastuzumab chemotherapy is common. BMI and age were independently associated with DD following anthracycline chemotherapy.

Early and late onset cardiotoxicity following anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: Incidence and predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity represents a major limitation for the use of anthracyclines or trastuzumab in breast cancer patients. Data on longitudinal studies about early and late onset cardiotoxicity in this group of patients is scarce. The objective of the present study was to assess predictors of early and late onset cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer treated with A. METHODS: 100 consecutive patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CHT) to treat breast cancer were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent evaluation at baseline, at the end of CHT, 3 months after the end of CHT and 1 and 4 years after the beginning of CHT. Clinical data, systolic and diastolic echo parameters and cardiac biomarkers including high sensitivity Troponin T (TnT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean doxorubicin dose was 243 mg/m2. Mean follow-up was 51.8 ± 8.2 months. At one-year incidence of anthracycline related-cardiotoxicity (AR-CT) was 4% and at the end of follow-up was 18% (15 patients asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 1 patients heart failure and 2 patients a sudden cardiac death). Forty-nine patients developed diastolic dysfunction (DD) during first year. In the univariate analysis DD during first year was the only parameter associated with AR-CT (Table 1). In the logistic regression model DD was independently related with the development of AR-CT, with an odds ratio value of 7.5 (95% CI 1.59-35.3). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of late-onset cardiotoxicity is high but mostly subclinical. Diastolic dysfunction early after chemotherapy is a strong predictor of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

Cardiogenic shock code 2023. Expert document for a multidisciplinary organization that allows quality care.

Despite the efforts made to improve the care of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients, including the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the prognosis of these patients continues to be poor. In this context, CS code initiatives arise, based on providing adequate, rapid, and quality care to these patients. In this multidisciplinary document we try to justify the need to implement the SC code, defining its structure/organization, activation criteria, patient flow according to care level, and quality indicators. Our specific purposes are: a) to present the peculiarities of this condition and the lessons of infarction code and previous experiences in CS; b) to detail the structure of the teams, their logistics and the bases for the management of these patients, the choice of the type of MCS, and the moment of its implantation, and c) to address challenges to SC code implementation, including the uniqueness of the pediatric SC code. There is an urgent need to develop protocolized, multidisciplinary, and centralized care in hospitals with a large volume and experience that will minimize inequity in access to the MCS and improve the survival of these patients. Only institutional and structural support from the different administrations will allow optimizing care for CS.

Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies.

AIMS: To compare primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and fibrinolysis in very old patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in whom head-to-head comparisons between both strategies are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients ≥75 years old with STEMI <6 h were randomized to pPCI or fibrinolysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, re-infarction, or disabling stroke at 30 days. The trial was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment after enrolling 266 patients (134 allocated to pPCI and 132 to fibrinolysis). Both groups were well balanced in baseline characteristics. Mean age was 81 years. The primary endpoint was reached in 25 patients in the pPCI group (18.9%) and 34 (25.4%) in the fibrinolysis arm [odds ratio (OR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-1.23; P = 0.21]. Similarly, non-significant reductions were found in death (13.6 vs. 17.2%, P = 0.43), re-infarction (5.3 vs. 8.2%, P = 0.35), or disabling stroke (0.8 vs. 3.0%, P = 0.18). Recurrent ischaemia was less common in pPCI-treated patients (0.8 vs. 9.7%, P< 0.001). No differences were found in major bleeds. A pooled analysis with the two previous reperfusion trials performed in older patients showed an advantage of pPCI over fibrinolysis in reducing death, re-infarction, or stroke at 30 days (OR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.91). CONCLUSION: Primary PCI seems to be the best reperfusion therapy for STEMI even for the oldest patients. Early contemporary fibrinolytic therapy may be a safe alternative to pPCI in the elderly when this is not available.

Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), early post-thrombolysis routine angioplasty has been discouraged because of its association with high incidence of events. The GRACIA-1 trial was designed to reassess the benefits of an early post-thrombolysis interventional approach in the era of stents and new antiplatelet agents. METHODS: 500 patients with thrombolysed STEMI (with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) were randomly assigned to angiography and intervention if indicated within 24 h of thrombolysis, or to an ischaemia-guided conservative approach. The primary endpoint was the combined rate of death, reinfarction, or revascularisation at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Invasive treatment included stenting of the culprit artery in 80% (199 of 248) patients, bypass surgery in six (2%), non-culprit artery stenting in three, and no intervention in 40 (16%). Predischarge revascularisation was needed in 51 of 252 patients in the conservative group. By comparison with patients receiving conservative treatment, by 1 year, patients in the invasive group had lower frequency of primary endpoint (23 [9%] vs 51 [21%], risk ratio 0.44 [95% CI 0.28-0.70], p=0.0008), and they tended to have reduced rate of death or reinfarction (7% vs 12%, 0.59 [0.33-1.05], p=0.07). Index time in hospital was shorter in the invasive group, with no differences in major bleeding or vascular complications. At 30 days both groups had a similar incidence of cardiac events. In-hospital incidence of revascularisation induced by spontaneous recurrence of ischaemia was higher in patients in the conservative group than in those in the invasive group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI, early post-thrombolysis catheterisation and appropriate intervention is safe and might be preferable to a conservative strategy since it reduces the need for unplanned in-hospital revascularisation, and improves 1-year clinical outcome.

Prevalence of Stable Angina in Spain. Results of the OFRECE Study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of the OFRECE study was to estimate the prevalence of stable angina in Spain. This prevalence is currently unknown, due to a lack of recent studies and to changes in the epidemiology and treatment of ischemic heart disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved a representative sample of the Spanish population aged 40 years or older, obtained via 2-stage random sampling: in the first stage, primary care physicians were randomly selected from each Spanish province, whereas in the second stage 20 people were selected from the population assigned to each physician. The prevalence was weighted by age, sex, and geographical area. Participants were classified as having angina if they met the "definite angina" criteria of the Rose questionnaire and as having confirmed angina if the angina was confirmed by a cardiologist or if they had a history of acute ischemic heart disease or revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 11 831 people invited to participate, 8378 (71%) were analyzed (mean age, 59.2 years). The weighted prevalence of definite angina (Rose) was 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-3.1%) and was higher in women (2.9%) than in men (2.2%), whereas that of confirmed angina was 1.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.0%-1.8%), without differences between men (1.5%) and women (1.3%). The prevalence of definite angina (Rose) increased with age (0.7% in patients aged 40 to 49 years and 7.1% in those aged 70 years or older), history of cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular risk factors, except smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of definite angina (Rose) in the Spanish population aged 40 years or older was 2.6%, whereas that of confirmed angina was 1.4%. Both prevalences increased with age, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiovascular history.

Coronary stent implantation in patients older than 75 years of age: clinical profile and initial and long-term (3 years) outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the initial and long-term outcome of elderly and younger patients after coronary stent implantation. METHODS: The evolutions of 76 patients aged >75 years and of 860 patients aged < or =75 years who underwent consecutive stenting (from June 1991 to June 1997) were compared in a cohort study. RESULTS: The elderly patients had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (0.58 +/- 0.14 vs 0.61 +/- 0.13; P =.03) and more frequently had unstable angina (78.9% vs 55.3%; P <.0001), previous heart failure (10.5% vs 4.9%; P =.03), and multivessel disease (68.4% vs 58.3%; P =.08). After the procedure, the elderly patients showed a higher inhospital mortality rate (6.6% vs 2.4%; P =.03) and myocardial infarction rate (5.3% vs 1.7%; P =.04). The long-term follow-up period (mean, 3.2 +/- 1.4 years; median, 3.0 years) showed in the elderly a higher mortality rate (15.4% vs 5.8%; P =.006), a lower rate of repeat revascularization (9.2% vs 19.7%; P =.04), and a similar incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events (27.7% vs 28.2%; P =.93). Multivariate analysis of the elderly group identified female gender (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.18 to 4.06; P =.012) and presence of multivessel disease (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.26; P =.037) as independent predictors of further events. CONCLUSION: Patients aged >75 years have a less favorable baseline profile and higher inhospital and 3-year mortality rates. However, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events in the long term is acceptable and similar to that of younger patients.

[Coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients. Current and future perspectives]. / Angioplastia coronaria en el paciente diabético. Situación actual y perspectivas futuras.

It has been estimated that 15-25% of patients who undergo percutaneous or surgical coronary angioplasty are diabetics. The indications for coronary revascularization and initial results of the procedure do not differ substantially between patients with diabetes mellitus and non-diabetics. However, the long-term results of both percutaneous and surgical coronary angioplasty are less favorable in diabetics in terms of mortality and the need for new revascularization procedures. The development and widespread use of stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibiting drugs have improved the clinical evolution of diabetics treated with angioplasty. Currently available data show that the administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to patients undergoing coronary angioplasty is especially useful in diabetics and improves short-term and long-term results, decreasing one-year mortality by 45%. There seem to be indications for the routine use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetics treated with angioplasty. While the use of stents has improved long-term and short-term results in diabetics, the success rates of angioplasty in diabetics are still lower than in non-diabetics. Diabetes is still an independent predictor of restenosis and long-term events after stenting interventions. Analysis of the studies comparing percutaneous and surgical revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel disease shows that surgery is superior in terms of long-term mortality and need for new revascularization procedures. Stenting has improved, but not substantially, the results of multivessel angioplasty in diabetics. Therefore, the indications for angioplasty in multivessel diabetics should be evaluated individually. Factors that contribute to the less favorable post-angioplasty evolution of diabetic patients are more rapid progression of atherosclerosis and, especially, a higher rate of restenosis. New angioplasty techniques, such as brachytherapy and drug-eluting stents, are likely to significantly improve the results of percutaneous interventions in diabetics, thus allowing the indications for angioplasty in diabetics to be extended even further in the near future.

[2002 Update of the Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for Unstable Angina/Without ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction]. / Actualización (2002) de las Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en angina inestable/infarto sin elevación del segmento ST.

Since the Spanish Society of Cardiology Clinical Practice Guidelines on Unstable Angina/Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction were released in 1999, the conclusions of several studies that have been published make it advisable to update current clinical recommendations. The main findings are related to the developing role of Chest Pain Units in the management and early risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department; new information concerning the efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel and low-molecular-weight heparins in the pharmacological treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation; and the role of early invasive strategy in improving the prognosis of these patients. The published evidence is reviewed and the corresponding clinical recommendations for the management of acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation are updated.

Role of the paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing postfibrinolysis angioplasty: the GRACIA-3 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A catheter-based approach after fibrinolysis is recommended if fibrinolysis is likely to be successful in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We designed a 2x2 randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel-eluting stent and tirofiban administered after fibrinolysis but before catheterization to optimize the results of this reperfusion strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 436 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction to (1) bare-metal stent without tirofiban, (2) bare-metal stent with tirofiban, (3) paclitaxel-eluting stent without tirofiban, and (4) paclitaxel-eluting stent with tirofiban. All patients were initially treated with tenecteplase and enoxaparin. Tirofiban was started 120 minutes after tenecteplase in those patients randomly assigned to tirofiban. Cardiac catheterization was performed within the first 3 to 12 hours after inclusion, and stenting (randomized paclitaxel or bare stent) was applied to the culprit artery. The primary objectives were the rate of in-segment binary restenosis of paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with that of bare-metal stent and the effect of tirofiban on epicardial and myocardial flow before and after mechanical revascularization. At 12 months, in-segment binary restenosis was similar between paclitaxel-eluting stent and bare-metal stent (10.1% versus 11.3%; relative risk, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.52; P=0.89). However, late lumen loss (0.04+/-0.055 mm versus 0.27+/-0.057 mm, P=0.003) was reduced in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group. No evidence was found of any association between the use of tirofiban and any improvement in the epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Major bleeding was observed in 6.1% of patients receiving tirofiban and in 2.7% of patients not receiving it (relative risk, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.73; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: This trial does not provide evidence to support the use of tirofiban after fibrinolysis to improve epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Compared with bare-metal stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent significantly reduced late loss but appeared not to reduce in-segment binary restenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00306228.

[Intermediate coronary care units: rationale, infrastructure, equipment, and referral criteria]. / Unidades coronarias de cuidados intermedios: base racional, infraestructura, equipamiento e indicaciones de ingreso.

The Spanish Working Group on Coronary Artery Disease of Spanish Society of Cardiology has considered to be necessary the development of this document on the need, structure and organization of Intermediate Cardiac Care Units (ICCU). Acute coronary syndrome registries show that an important percentage of patients receive a suboptimal care, due to an inadequate management of health resources or absence of them. Intermediate cardiac care units arise to solve these challenges and to manage in an efficient way these expensive and limited resources. Their aims are: a) to provide each patient the level of care required; b) to optimize the structural, technical and human resources, and c) to make easier continuous care and care gradient. As a result, ICCU should be established as an essential part of the cardiology department aim to cardiac patients requiring monitoring and medical care superior to those available in a regular cardiac ward but whose risk does not justify the technical and human costs of a Coronary Unit. This document describes the structure (equipment, human resources, management) required to reach the goals previously reported and includes recommendations about indications of admission in a ICCU. These indications include: a) patients with NSTE-ACS with intermediate or high risk but hemodynamically stable, and b) low risk STEAMI or high risk STEAMI stabilized after an initial admission at the Coronary Unit. The admission of some patients undergoing invasive procedures or suffering non-coronary acute cardiac diseases, is also considered.

Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation (STEMI), primary angioplasty is frequently not available or performed beyond the recommended time limit. We designed a non-inferiority, randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether lytic-based early routine angioplasty represents a reasonable reperfusion option for victims of STEMI irrespective of geographic or logistical barriers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 212 STEMI patients were randomized to full tenecteplase followed by stenting within 3-12 h of randomization (early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty; 104 patients), or to undergo primary stenting with abciximab within 3 h of randomization (primary angioplasty; 108 patients). The primary endpoints were epicardial and myocardial reperfusion, and the extent of left ventricular myocardial damage, determined by means of the infarct size and 6-week left ventricular function. The secondary endpoints were the acute incidence of bleeding and the 6-month composite incidence of death, reinfarction, stroke, or revascularization. Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty resulted in higher frequency (21 vs. 6%, P = 0.003) of complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion (TIMI 3 epicardial flow and TIMI 3 myocardial perfusion and resolution of the initial sum of ST-segment elevation > or = 70%) following angioplasty. Both groups were similar regarding infarct size (area under the curve of CK-MB: 4613 +/- 3373 vs. 4649 +/- 3632 microg/L/h, P = 0.94); 6-week left ventricular function (ejection fraction: 59.0 +/- 11.6 vs. 56.2 +/- 13.2%, P = 0.11; endsystolic volume index: 27.2 +/- 12.8 vs. 29.7 +/- 13.6, P = 0.21); major bleeding (1.9 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.99) and 6-month cumulative incidence of the clinical endpoint (10 vs. 12%, P = 0.57; relative risk: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-1.74). CONCLUSION: Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty safely results in better myocardial perfusion than primary angioplasty. Despite its later application, this approach seems to be equivalent to primary angioplasty in limiting infarct size and preserving left ventricular function.

Safety of coronary stenting early after thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: one- and six-month clinical and angiographic evolution.

To determine the feasibility and safety of early posthrombolysis coronary stenting and the incidence of further reocclusion, we followed 99 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction thrombolyzed with rt-PA 2.0 +/- 0.8 hr after onset. Culprit artery was stented 14.0 +/- 7.0 hr after thrombolysis. All patients underwent clinical and angiographic follow-up at 1 and 6 months. Angiographic success was achieved in 99% of cases. Neither major cardiac events nor bleeding or vascular complications occurred during hospital stay. At 30 days, no events occurred and normal flow persisted in all stented arteries. At 6 months, only one artery reoccluded (1%), resulting in a nonfatal reinfarction. Restenosis rate was 21%. Contribution of the infarcted area to left ventricular function significantly increased from baseline to 30-day and to 6-month evaluations. Thus, early posthrombolysis stenting is a safe strategy with a low reocclusion rate, which seems to allow functional recovery of the infarcted area. Further studies are necessary to define its impact on survival and cost-effectiveness.