Three-year outcomes and reconnection patterns after initial contact force guided pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Contact force (CF) sensing is a novel technology used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the single procedure success of CF-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with that of non-CF guided PVI during a 3-year (1,095 days) follow up period and analyzed the pattern of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection. METHODS: A cohort of 167 subjects (68 CF vs. 99 non-CF) with paroxysmal AF were included in the study. Atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrence was defined as documented AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 seconds and occurring after 90 days. RESULTS: Subjects in the CF group showed a statistically nonsignificant improvement in AA free survival compared to those in the non-CF group (66.2% vs. 51.5%; P value: 0.06). A greater propensity for reconnection was noted around the right-sided PVs compared to left-sided PVs related in both catheter ablation groups. For example, in the CF group 36% of right-sided segments reconnected compared to 16% of left-sided segments (P value <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A greater propensity for reconnection was noted around the right sided PV segments in both the CF and non-CF groups. The explanation for this finding was related to greater catheter instability around the right sided veins. Further research is needed to explore the utility of a "real-time" composite indicator that includes RF energy, CF and catheter stability in predicting transmural lesion formation during catheter ablation.

Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Electrophysiologic Procedures in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: The electrophysiology field has progressed rapidly over the last 2 decades. No study has examined the characteristics of patients and types of electrophysiology procedures performed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is important given our distinctly different demographic composition and health system. As such, we sought to describe the characteristics of consecutive patients presenting for electrophysiology procedures in our tertiary care hospital. Methods: Data was collected from the electrophysiology database at King Khalid University Hospital for procedures performed between April 2016 and November 2022. Patients' characteristics were retrieved from the electronic medical record. Procedures were categorized into supraventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contraction and "complex ablations", which included atrial fibrillation and scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia ablation. If no abnormality was found, the procedure was labeled as "normal EP study". Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia among patients presenting with undifferentiated supraventricular tachycardia. Results: A total of 459 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 42.06 years (±14.89 years), and 256 (55.77 %) were females. The most common procedure was supraventricular tachycardia (n = 289/459, 63.24 %), and only 5 % had complex ablations. The most common type of supraventricular tachycardia ablated was found to be atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (n = 157/289, 54 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed female sex and age to be independently associated with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (OR = 2.27 95 % CI [1.40-3.67]) for female sex and (OR = 1.02 95 % CI [1.01-1.04]) for every increase in age by 1-year. Conclusion: We reported a younger average age than other countries and less complex ablations. In addition, we reported 2 independent predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in patients presenting with undifferentiated supraventricular tachycardia. Larger studies including multiple centers should be performed to confirm our findings.

Identifying and Managing Premature Ventricular Contraction-Induced Cardiomyopathy: What, Why, and How?

Premature ventricular contraction (PVC)-induced cardiomyopathy is increasingly being recognized as a reversible cause of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The diagnosis of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy is considered in subjects with high PVC burdens (> 10,000 per 24 hours) after excluding other known causes of LVSD. PVC suppression is the mainstay of the management of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy, in addition to proven evidence-based medical therapy recommended for subjects with LVSD. Management strategies for PVC-induced cardiomyopathy include medical therapy and/or catheter ablation, with an increasing role for catheter ablation as a first-line therapy in view of the potential for permanent suppression of PVCs. Recovery of LVSD is typically a gradual process over months after effective suppression of PVCs. Last, asymptomatic patients with high PVC burdens and preserved LV systolic function appear to be at low risk over the intermediate term for developing LVSD. However, it is prudent to monitor LV function periodically because of the potential for deterioration of LV function observed during long-term follow-up in some subjects.

Prognostic implications of prominent R wave in electrocardiographic leads V1 or V2 in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Although the adverse prognosis of Q-waves on electrocardiogram (ECG) has been demonstrated, the prognostic significance of prominent R wave (PRW) in V1 or V2 across a broad spectrum of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been specifically studied. In the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and the Canadian ACS Registry I ECG substudies, admission ECGs were analyzed in an independent core ECG laboratory. PRW was defined as R wave >40 to 50 ms in V1 or V2, R/S ≥1 in V1, or R/S ≥1.5 in V2. Among 11,895 patients with ACS, 495 (4.2%) had PRW; they were less likely to have a history of hypertension or heart failure and had lower GRACE risk scores, but a higher incidence of ST-segment depression (all p ≤0.001). Patients with PRW had similar rates of in-hospital death (2.8% vs 4.1%, respectively, p = 0.15) but lower rates of in-hospital heart failure (8.5% vs 15.2%, respectively, p = 0.02) and 6-month mortality (4.6% vs 8.4%, respectively, p = 0.004). In multivariable analyses, PRW was not a significant independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.8) or 6-month mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.15). Among 4,418 patients who underwent coronary angiography, those with PRW had a higher prevalence of left circumflex artery disease (62.5% vs 49.5%, respectively, p = 0.01). In conclusion, across the broad spectrum of patients with ACS, PRW provides no significant additional prognostic utility beyond comprehensive risk assessment using the GRACE risk score. PRW is more frequently associated with left circumflex artery disease.