RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An association between certain immunomodulatory therapies (rituximab, ipilimumab, and other immune checkpoint inhibitors) and inflammatory (non-ischemic and non-infectious) colitis in oncologic and non-oncologic patient populations is well documented in the medical literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case series is to describe adverse event reports of new onset, inflammatory colitis in association with ocrelizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis submitted to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or published in the medical literature. METHODS: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and medical literature were searched. RESULTS: A review of postmarketing cases from FAERS and published medical literature identified 38 cases consistent with inflammatory, non-ischemic, and non-infectious colitis in association with ocrelizumab. The median time-to-onset was 8 months. Cases were reported using the following diagnostic terms: Crohn's disease (13), unspecified colitis (11), microscopic colitis (5), ulcerative colitis (5), medication-induced colitis (3), and autoimmune colitis (2). CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights ocrelizumab induced immune-mediated colitis that can be clinically severe and potentially life-threatening. Based on the findings of this review, the ocrelizumab Prescribing Information was amended to include immune-mediated colitis in the Warnings and Precautions section.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Colitis , Enfermedad de Crohn , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Colitis/inducido químicamente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders including irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and functional constipation are common conditions in childhood, but no drugs are U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for chronic use in pediatric patients with these disorders. Despite efforts to better standardize the diagnosis of these conditions in children (including recent modifications to the Rome criteria), conducting pediatric clinical trials to support drug approval remains a challenge. In March 2018, FDA, in collaboration with the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, American Gastroenterological Association, and American College of Gastroenterology, convened a public workshop to discuss the challenges and opportunities in conducting pediatric clinical trials in functional gastrointestinal conditions. The workshop assembled gastroenterologists, psychologists, patients, patient advocates, regulators, and industry representatives to discuss trial design and conduct including alternative designs, eligibility criteria, instruments for patient- and observer-reported outcomes, and optimal primary endpoints to support regulatory approval. This report summarizes the workshop, key challenges and knowledge gaps identified, and outlines areas where further research efforts are needed to overcome barriers to developing drugs to treat these conditions.
Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Niño , Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/tendencias , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Pediatría/tendencias , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Investigación Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Preescolar , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Difusión de Innovaciones , Aprobación de Drogas , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Pediatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to quantify the diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy in children with gastroparesis and to develop a clinical model for gastroparesis using common symptoms and screening blood tests. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 196 patients of age 4 to 18 years evaluated for gastroparesis between 2009 and 2013. All patients completed a standard solid-phase gastric emptying scan and upper endoscopy within a 12-month period. We analyzed gross and histologic endoscopy findings. Symptom-based data were collected on dyspeptic symptoms and classic "red-flag" symptoms. RESULTS: Seventy patients with gastroparesis and 126 controls were included. Clinically significant endoscopic findings were noted in 35% of controls (44/126) and 43% of gastroparetics (30/70), Pâ=â0.345. Concordance between gross and histologic findings was low at 50%. Histologic findings included gastritis 60% (17/28), esophagitis 39% (11/28), and duodenitis 7% (2/28). In univariate and multivariate analyses, there was no meaningful correlation between symptoms and/or screening laboratory values and diagnosis of gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant endoscopy findings were common in both controls and gastroparetics. As more than one-third of patients had findings on endoscopy, we conclude that upper endoscopy remains an important part of the evaluation process of patients with dyspeptic symptoms and suspected gastroparesis. As gross abnormalities were frequently not present with histologic changes, routine biopsy is required. There was no association between studied symptoms and the presence of gastroparesis. A comprehensive evaluation of children with dyspeptic symptoms requires endoscopy with biopsy and solid-phase gastric emptying scan to determine the underlying diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroparesia/patología , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Duodeno/diagnóstico por imagen , Duodeno/patología , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Gastroparesia/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estómago/diagnóstico por imagen , Estómago/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite recent approvals for new drugs to treat adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, there are only two approved advanced treatment options [infliximab and adalimumab] for children with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. There are many potential new therapies being developed for adult and paediatric IBD. Moreover, regulatory agencies in both the European Union and USA have processes in place to support the early planning and initiation of paediatric studies. Nevertheless, unacceptable delays in approvals for use of drugs in children persist, with an average 7-year gap, or longer, between authorization of new IBD drugs for adults and children. METHODS: A 2-day virtual meeting was held during April 14-15, 2021 for multi-stakeholders [clinical academics, patient community, pharmaceutical companies and regulators] to discuss their perspectives on paediatric drug development for IBD. RESULTS: The multi-stakeholder group presented, discussed and proposed actions to achieve expediting the approval of new drugs in development for paediatric IBD. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative action points for all stakeholders are required to make progress and facilitate new drug development for children with IBD.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
On February 24, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an efficacy supplement for HUMIRA® (adalimumab) injection to expand the indication of treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) to include pediatric patients 5 years of age and older. The effectiveness in pediatric patients with moderately to severely active UC was studied in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial (Study PUC-I, NCT02065557) in 93 pediatric patients 5 to 17 years of age. Adalimumab has been widely studied in multiple indications in adult and pediatric populations with a well-established safety profile; no apparent exposure-safety relationship has been identified in various pediatric populations treated with adalimumab across multiple indications. The approved dosing regimen in pediatric patients with UC differs from the regimen studied in the clinical trial and was determined based on a model-informed exposure bridging strategy, incorporating both efficacy and safety considerations. Specifically, the differences included switches from body weight-based (mg/kg) dosing regimens used in the pediatric trial to body weight-tiered, fixed-dose regimens, changes in dosing schedule, and the addition of an option of a less frequent dosing regimen for maintenance that was not studied in the clinical trial. This article provides a case example of successful model-informed drug development (MIDD), where modeling and simulation were utilized in combination with observed data from a clinical trial of limited size and scope to ultimately support the adalimumab approval in pediatric patients with UC.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Colitis Ulcerosa , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Peso Corporal , Niño , Preescolar , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
The use of extrapolation of efficacy in pediatric drug development programs is possible when disease progression and treatment response are similar in adult and pediatric populations. Historically, the exposure-response (E-R) similarity was assessed by visual inspection of 2 E-R curves to support pediatric extrapolation. The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative framework to describe the E-R relationship and the difference in E-R between pediatric and adult patients based on accumulated experience in pediatric drug development programs. Using clinical data for 8 drugs with either a linear or nonlinear E-R relationship, we adapted the methodology used in noninferiority testing to assess the E-R similarity between adult and pediatric patients at the targeted drug exposure. We implemented bootstrap-based and Bayesian-based methodologies to estimate the probability of concluding noninferiority of the E-R relationship. This approach provides objective criteria that can be applied to an assessment of E-R noninferiority in 2 populations to support extrapolation of efficacy in drug development programs from adults to pediatric populations.
Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Adulto , Niño , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Aprobación de Drogas/métodos , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Humanos , Probabilidad , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Children and adolescents with sickle cell disease demonstrate an increased incidence of pica. Pica involving polyurethane foam has been previously reported, but effective management of such cases remains unclear. We present the case of a 17-year-old African American adolescent girl with sickle ß+ thalassemia who presented with a long history of foam rubber pica resulting in intestinal obstruction. Conservative management was unsuccessful, and the patient ultimately required operative intervention. We advocate for a low threshold for early operation in cases of foam rubber bezoar.