Measuring the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter with Ultrasound in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) with ultrasound enables non-invasive and indirect assessment of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Although most of the studies were employed with traumatic brain injury patients, it's increasingly popular in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) studies. OBJECTIVES: Evaluating whether using ONSD as a follow-up measurement would help monitor the thrombolytic therapy (TT) effectiveness and determine the high-risk patients for malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted between August 1, 2019, and February 1, 2020, in a tertiary hospital. Forty-four patients were eligible. We determined the TT moment as the time when the first ocular ultrasound measurement would be made (time 0). Also, we decided on the 24th h after the treatment as the time to perform the second ocular ultrasound measurement (time 24). The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) scores were evaluated blindly at the time-0 and the time-24. The cut-off value of ONSD was 0.55 mm. RESULTS: There was no difference in ONSD results before and after the TT (p = 0.414). But, patients with an equal or higher value than cut-off had an increased risk for complications such as malignant-MCA, bleeding, seizure, etc. (p = 0.05). Malignant-MCA was observed in four patients with higher ONSD values. At the time-24, NIHSS decreased, GCS and ASPECT scores increased. Finally, ONSD was positively correlated with the NIHSS and negatively correlated with the GCS at the time-24. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring ONSD values in both the emergency department and the intensive care unit may be useful in the early diagnosis of MCA stroke complications and the follow-up of TT's effectiveness.

Comparison of CURB-65 Pneumonia Severity Score, Quick COVID-19 Severity Index, and Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale in Emergently Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Pneumonia.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the performance of the CURB-65, the quick COVID-19 severity index (qCSI), and the Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale (BCRSS) scores in predicting ICU (intensive care unit) hospitalization and in-hospital mortality in emergently hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the emergently hospitalized 258 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia consecutively. The required sample size was calculated to compare the areas under the two ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves (AUC) using the MedCalc 20.0 program (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium). In addition, we actualized ROC analyses of the CURB-65, the qCSI, and the BCRSS scores and compared the ROC curves of these three scores. Results: The median age of the patients was 73, and 63.6% (n=164) were male. Of 258 patients, 29.5% (n=76) were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 15.9% (n=41) died. The CURB-65 and the qCSI scores predicted ICU admission at a moderate level (p≤0.001; AUC values were 0.743 and 0.723, respectively). However, the predictive effect of the BCRSS score for ICU admission was lower (p≤0.001; AUC value was 0.667). The CURB-65 predicted in-hospital mortality at a moderate level ( p≤0.001; AUC value was 0.762). However, the predictive effect of the qCSI and the BCRSS scores for in-hospital mortality were lower ( p≤0.001 and p=0.012, respectively; AUC values were 0.655 and 0.612, respectively). Conclusion: The CURB-65 score predicted ICU hospitalization and in-hospital mortality better than the qCSI and the BCRSS scores. Also, the qCSI score predicted ICU admission better than the BCRSS score.The predictive effect of the BCRSS score was the lowest. We recommend future studies to evaluate the value and utility of COVID-19 risk classification models.