Less Is More: Dissecting Trauma Centers by Procedural Volume.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the relationship between procedural volume and annual trauma volume (ATV) of ACS Level I trauma centers (TC). BACKGROUND: Although ATV is a hard criterion for TC verification, importance of procedural interventions as a potential quality indicator is understudied. METHODS: Patients managed at ACS level I TCs were identified from ACS-TQIP 2017-2021. TCs were identified using facility keys and stratified into quartiles based on ATV into low, low-medium, medium-high, and high volume. TCs were also stratified into tertiles [low (LV), medium (MV), high (HV)] based on procedural volume by assessing annual number of laparotomies, thoracotomies, craniotomies/craniectomies, angioembolizations, vascular repairs, and long bone fixations performed at each center. The Cohen κ statistic was used to assess concordance between ATV and procedural volume. RESULTS: A total of 182 Level I TCs were identified: 76 low, 47 low-medium, 35 high-medium, and 24 high volume. Long bone fixation, laparotomy, and craniotomy/craniectomy were the most performed procedures with a median of 65, 59, and 46 cases/center/year, respectively. Overall, 31% of HV laparotomy centers, 31% of HV thoracotomy centers, 22% of HV craniotomy/craniectomy centers, 22% of HV vascular repair centers, 32% of HV long bone fixation centers, and 33% of HV angioembolization centers contributed to the overall number of low-medium and low-volume TCs. The Cohen κ statistic demonstrated poor concordance between ATV and procedural volumes for all procedures (overall procedural volume-κ=0.378, laparotomy-κ=0.270, thoracotomy-κ=0.202, craniotomy/craniectomy-κ=0.394, vascular repair-κ=0.298, long bone fixation-κ=0.277, angioembolization-κ=0.286). CONCLUSIONS: ATV does not reflect the procedural interventions performed. Combination of procedural and ATV may provide a more accurate picture of the clinical experience at any given TC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Importance of Circulation in Airway Management: Preventing Post-Intubation Hypotension in The Trauma Bay.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with post-intubation hypotension (PIH) among trauma patients who required endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the trauma bay. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: ETI has been associated with hemodynamic instability, termed PIH, yet its risk factors in trauma patients remain under-investigated. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study at a level I trauma center over 4 years (2019-2022). All adult (≥18) trauma patients requiring ETI in the trauma bay were included. Blood pressure was monitored both pre- and post-intubation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with PIH. RESULTS: 708 patients required ETI in the trauma bay, of which, 435 (61.4%) developed PIH. The mean (SD) age was 43 (21) and 71% were male. Median [IQR] arrival GCS was 7 [3-13]. Patients who developed PIH had a lower mean (SD) pre-intubation SBP (118 (46) vs. 138 (28), P<0.001) and higher median [IQR] ISS (27 [21-38] vs. 21 [9-26], P<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis identified BMI>25, increasing ISS, penetrating injury, spinal cord injury, Pre-intubation PRBC requirements, and diabetes mellitus as non-modifiable risk factors associated with increased odds of PIH. In contrast, pre-intubation administration of 3% hypertonic saline and vasopressors were identified as the modifiable factors significantly associated with reduced PIH. CONCLUSION: More than half of the patients requiring ETI in the trauma bay developed PIH. This study identified modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors that influence the development of PIH, which will help physicians when considering ETI upon patient arrival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic Study.

The role of number of affected vessels on radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of data on the role of characteristics of injured vessels on the outcomes of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the number (single vs multiple) of injured vessels on outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective study at two American College of Surgeons Level I trauma centers (2017-2021). Adult (>16 years) trauma patients with BCVIs are included. Injuries were graded by the Denver Scale based on the initial computed tomography angiography (CTA). Early repeat CTA was performed 7 to 10 days after diagnosis. Patients were stratified by the number (single vs multiple) of the involved vessels. Outcomes included progression of BCVIs on repeat CTA, stroke, and in-hospital mortality attributable to BCVIs. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the association between the number of injured vessels and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients with 591 injured vessels (285 carotid and 306 vertebral arteries) were identified. Sixty percent were male, the mean age was 44 years, and the median Injury Severity Score was 18 (interquartile range, 11-25). Overall, 18% had multiple-vessel injuries, 16% had bilateral vessel injuries, and 3% had multiple injuries on the same side. The overall rates of progression to higher-grade injuries, stroke, and mortality were 23%, 7.7%, and 8.8%, respectively. On uni- and multivariable analyses, multiple BCVIs were associated with progression to higher-grade injuries on repeat imaging, stroke, and mortality compared with single-vessel injuries. CONCLUSIONS: BCVIs with multiple injured vessels are more likely to progress to higher grades on repeat CTA, with multiple injuries independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with those with single injuries. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating the number of injured vessels in clinical decision-making and in defining protocols for repeat imaging.

Decreased Glycocalyx Shedding on Presentation in Hemorrhaging Geriatric Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma levels of syndecan-1 (Sdc-1), a biomarker of endothelial glycocalyx (EG) damage, correlate with worse outcomes in trauma patients. However, EG injury is not well characterized in injured older adults (OA). The aims of this study were to characterize Sdc-1 shedding in OA trauma patients relative to younger adults (YA) and determine associations with putative regulators of EG sheddases. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet, and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial, stratifying bluntly injured subjects into OA and YA groups based on upper age quartile (57 y). Plasma Sdc-1 levels were compared in OA and YA at hospital arrival through postinjury day 3, and the independent association between age and Sdc-1 level at arrival was determined after adjusting for differences in gender, shock index (SI), and pre-existing comorbidities. In a follow-up analysis, case-control matching was used to create populations of OA and YA with equivalent SI and injury severity score. Levels of Sdc-1 were compared between these matched groups, and the relationships with candidate regulators of EG shedding were assessed. RESULTS: Of 680 subjects in the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet, and Plasma Ratios trial, 350 (51%) had blunt injuries, and 92 (26.3%) of these were OA. Plasma Sdc-1 levels at arrival, 2 h, and 6 h were significantly lower in OA compared to YA (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for sex, pre-existing morbidities and SI, age was associated with decreased Sdc-1 levels at arrival. In the matched analyses, Sdc-1, high-mobility group box 1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 levels were lower in OA compared to YA. Both high-mobility group box-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 significantly correlated with arrival Sdc-1 and were inversely associated with age. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that increased age is independently associated with decreased Sdc-1 levels among patients with blunt injuries. Suppressed plasma levels of sheddases in relation to diminished Sdc-1 shedding suggest that mechanisms regulating EG cleavage may be impaired in injured older adults. These findings provide novel insight into the age-dependent impact of injury on the vascular endothelium, which could have important implications for the clinical management of older adults following trauma.

Should We Keep or Transfer Our Severely Injured Geriatric Patients to Higher Levels of Care?

INTRODUCTION: Interfacility transfer to higher levels of care is becoming increasingly common. This study aims to evaluate the association between transfer to higher levels of care and prolonged transfer times with outcomes of severely injured geriatric trauma patients compared to those who are managed definitively at lower-level trauma centers. METHODS: Severely injured (Injury Severity Score >15) geriatric (≥60 y) trauma patients in the 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database managing at an American College of Surgeons/State Level III trauma center or transferring to a level I or II trauma center were included. Outcome measures were 24-h and in-hospital mortality and major complications. RESULTS: Forty thousand seven hundred nineteen patients were identified. Mean age was 75 ± 8 y, 54% were male, 98% had a blunt mechanism of injury, and the median Injury Severity Score was 17 [16-21]. Median transfer time was 112 [79-154] min, and the most common transport mode was ground ambulance (82.3%). Transfer to higher levels of care within 90 min was associated with lower 24-h mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.493, P < 0.001) and similar odds of in-hospital mortality as those managed at level III centers. However, every 30-min delay in transfer time beyond 90 min was progressively associated with increased odds of 24-h (aOR: 1.058, P < 0.001) and in-hospital (aOR: 1.114, P < 0.001) mortality and major complications (aOR: 1.127, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Every 30-min delay in interfacility transfer time beyond 90 min is associated with 6% and 11% higher risk-adjusted odds of 24-h and in-hospital mortality, respectively. Estimated interfacility transfer time should be considered while deciding about transferring severely injured geriatric trauma patients to a higher level of care.

Trauma Laparotomy for the Cirrhotic Patient: An Outcome-Based Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of large-scale data on outcomes of cirrhotic patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. We aimed to compare outcomes of cirrhotic versus noncirrhotic trauma patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS: We analyzed 2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included blunt trauma patients (≥18 y) who underwent a laparotomy. Patients who were transferred, dead on arrival, or had penetrating injuries were excluded. Patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio (cirrhotic and noncirrhotic). Outcomes included mortality, complications, failure to rescue, transfusion requirements, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay. Multivariable backward stepwise regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-one patients (cirrhotic, 157; noncirrhotic, 314) were matched. Mean age was 57 ± 15 y, 78% were male, and median injury severity score was 24. Cirrhotic patients had higher rates of mortality (60% versus 30%, P value <0.001), complications (49% versus 37%; P value = 0.01), failure to rescue (66% versus 36%, P value<0.001), and pRBC (units, median, 11 [7-18] versus 7 [4-11], P value <0.001) transfusion requirements. There were no significant differences in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay (P value ≥0.05). On multivariate analysis, increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02, P value <0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8 at presentation (aOR 3.3, P value <0.001), and total splenectomy (aOR 5.7, P value <0.001) were associated with higher odds of mortality. Platelet transfusion was associated with lower odds of mortality (aOR 0.84, P value = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: On a national scale, mortality following trauma laparotomy is twice as high for cirrhotic patients compared to noncirrhotic patients with higher rates of major complications and failure to rescue. Our finding of a protective effect of platelet transfusion may be explained by the platelet dysfunction associated with cirrhosis. Liver cirrhosis among trauma patients warrants heightened surveillance.

The Role of Whole Blood Hemostatic Resuscitation in Bleeding Geriatric Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Whole blood (WB) has recently gained increased popularity as an adjunct to the resuscitation of hemorrhaging civilian trauma patients. We aimed to assess the nationwide outcomes of using WB as an adjunct to component therapy (CT) versus CT alone in resuscitating geriatric trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a 5-y (2017-2021) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included geriatric (age, ≥65 y) trauma patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock (shock index >1) and requiring at least 4 units of packed red blood cells in 4 h. Patients with severe head injuries (head Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3) and transferred patients were excluded. Patients were stratified into WB-CT versus CT only. Primary outcomes were 6-h, 24-h, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major complications. Multivariable regression analysis was performed, adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 1194 patients were identified, of which 141 (12%) received WB. The mean ± standard deviation age was 74 ± 7 y, 67.5% were male, and 83.4% had penetrating injuries. The median [interquartile range] Injury Severity Score was 19 [13-29], with no difference among study groups (P = 0.059). Overall, 6-h, 24-h, and in-hospital mortality were 16%, 23.1%, and 43.6%, respectively. On multivariable regression analysis, WB was independently associated with reduced 24-h (odds ratio, 0.62 [0.41-0.94]; P = 0.024), and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.60 [0.40-0.90]; P = 0.013), but not with major complications (odds ratio, 0.78 [0.53-1.15]; P = 0.207). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion of WB as an adjunct to CT is associated with improved early and overall mortality in geriatric trauma patients presenting with severe hemorrhage. The findings from this study are clinically important, as this is an essential first step in prioritizing the selection of WB resuscitation for geriatric trauma patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock.

Predictors of Receiving Mental Health Services in Trauma Patients With Positive Drug Screen.

INTRODUCTION: Initial interaction with health care system presents an important opportunity to provide substance use disorder (SUD) rehabilitation in the form of mental health services (MHSs). This study aims to identify predictors of receipt of MHSs among adult trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screen. METHODS: In this analysis of 2017-2021 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP), adult(≥18 y) patients with SUD and positive drug screen who survived the hospital admission were included. Outcomes measure was the receipt of MHS. Poisson regression analysis with clustering by facility was performed to identify independent predictors of receipt of MHS. RESULTS: 128,831 patients were identified of which 3.4% received MHS. Mean age was 41 y, 76% were male, 63% were White, 25% were Black, 12% were Hispanic, and 82% were insured. Median injury severity score was 9, and 54% were managed at an ACS level I trauma center. On regression analysis, female gender (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.09-1.25), age ≥65 y (aOR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99), White race (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.28-1.47), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.76-0.93), insured status (aOR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.13-1.33), and management at ACS level I trauma centers (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.38-1.57) were independent predictors of receipt of MHS. CONCLUSIONS: Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors predict the receipt of MHS in trauma patients with SUD and positive drug screens. It is unknown if these disparities affect the long-term outcomes of these vulnerable patients. Further research is warranted to expand on the contributing factors leading to these disparities and possible strategies to address them.

Development and Validation of Futility of Resuscitation Measure in Older Adult Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to develop and validate Futility of Resuscitation Measure (FoRM) for predicting the futility of resuscitation among older adult trauma patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2018) (derivation cohort) and American College of Surgeons level I trauma center database (2017-2022) (validation cohort). We included all severely injured (injury severity score >15) older adult (aged ≥60 y) trauma patients. Patients were stratified into decades of age. Injury characteristics (severe traumatic brain injury [Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8], traumatic brain injury midline shift), physiologic parameters (lowest in-hospital systolic blood pressure [≤1 h], prehospital cardiac arrest), and interventions employed (4-h packed red blood cell transfusions, emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, emergency laparotomy [≤2 h], early vasopressor requirement [≤6 h], and craniectomy) were identified. Regression coefficient-based weighted scoring system was developed using the Schneeweiss method and subsequently validated using institutional database. RESULTS: A total of 5562 patients in derivation cohort and 873 in validation cohort were identified. Mortality was 31% in the derivation cohort and FoRM had excellent discriminative power to predict mortality (area under the receiver operator characteristic = 0.860; 95% confidence interval [0.847-0.872], P < 0.001). Patients with a FoRM score of >16 had a less than 10% chance of survival, while those with a FoRM score of >20 had a less than 5% chance of survival. In validation cohort, mortality rate was 17% and FoRM had good discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [0.71-0.80], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FoRM can reliably identify the risk of futile resuscitation among older adult patients admitted to our level I trauma center.

Failure to Rescue in Geriatric Ground-Level Falls: The Role of Frailty on Not-So-Minor Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The measure of mortality following a major complication (failure to rescue [FTR]) provides a quantifiable assessment of the level of care provided by trauma centers. However, there is a lack of data on the effects of patient-related factors on FTR incidence. The aim of this study was to identify the role of frailty on FTR incidence among geriatric trauma patients with ground-level falls (GLFs). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2020). All geriatric (aged ≥ 65 ys) trauma patients with GLFs admitted to a level I trauma center were included. Transferred patients, those with severe head injuries (head abbreviated injury scale ≥ 3), and those who died within 24 h of admission or whose length of stay was ≤1 d were excluded. FTR was defined as death following a major complication (cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unplanned intubation, acute renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, ventilator-associated pneumonia, or pulmonary embolism). Patients were stratified into frail (F) and nonfrail (NF) based on the 11-Factor Modified Frailty Index. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the independent effect of frailty on the incidence of FTR. RESULTS: Over 4 ys, 34,100 geriatric patients with GLFs were identified, of whom 9140 (26.8%) were F. The mean (standard deviation) age was 78 (7) years and 65% were female. The median injury severity score was 9 (5-10) with no difference among F and NF groups (P = 0.266). Overall, F patients were more likely to develop major complications (F: 3.6% versus NF: 2%, P < 0.001) and experience FTR (F: 1.8%% versus NF: 0.6%, P < 0.001). Moreover, among patients with major complications, F patients were more likely to die (F: 47% versus NF: 27%, P < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, frailty was identified as an independent predictor of major complications (adjusted odds ratio: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [1.70-2.29], P < 0.001) and FTR (adjusted odds ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval [1.68-3.05], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among geriatric trauma patients with GLFs, frailty increases the risk-adjusted odds of FTR by more than two times. One in every two F patients with a major complication does not survive to discharge. Future efforts should concentrate on improving patient-related and hospital-related factors to decrease the risk of FTR among these vulnerable populations.