Safety of diagnostic coronary angiography during uninterrupted therapeutic warfarin treatment.

Long-term warfarin therapy is assumed to increase bleeding and access site complications after coronary angiography and it is often recommended to postpone invasive procedures to reach international normalized ratio (INR) levels <1.8. To assess the safety and feasibility of diagnostic coronary angiography during uninterrupted warfarin therapy, we retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients (n = 258) on warfarin therapy referred for diagnostic coronary angiography in 2 centers with long experience in uninterrupted warfarin therapy during coronary angiography and in 1 center with a policy of preprocedural warfarin pause. An age- and gender-matched control group (n = 258) with similar disease presentation (unstable or stable symptoms) was collected from each center. Radial access was used in 56% of patients in the warfarin group and in 60% of controls (p = 0.21). There was no difference in access site and bleeding complications (1.9% vs 1.6%) or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (0.4% vs 0.8%) between the warfarin group and their controls. Warfarin was interrupted in 80 patients (31%), and bridging therapy was used in 24 of these patients (30%). INR levels were higher in the uninterrupted warfarin group (2.3 vs 1.9, p <0.001), but the incidence of access site complications was not higher (1.7%) than in patients (n = 80) with a warfarin pause (2.5%) or in patients with pause and bridging therapy (8.3%). Need for blood transfusions (n = 2) occurred only in patients with bridging therapy. Access site complications were more common in the 22 patients with supratherapeutic anticoagulation (INR >3) than in patients with therapeutic periprocedural INR (9.1% vs 1.5%, p <0.05). In conclusion, a simple strategy of performing coronary angiography during uninterrupted therapeutic warfarin anticoagulation is a tempting alternative to bridging therapy and is likely to lead to considerable cost savings.

Heterozygous junctophilin-2 (JPH2) p.(Thr161Lys) is a monogenic cause for HCM with heart failure.

During the last two decades, mutations in sarcomere genes have found to comprise the most common cause for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but still significant number of patients with dominant HCM in the family are left without molecular genetic diagnosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) does not only enable evaluation of established HCM genes but also candidate genes for cardiomyopathy are frequently tested which may lead to a situation where conclusive interpretation of the variant requires extensive family studies. We aimed to characterize the phenotype related to a variant in the junctophilin-2 (JPH2) gene, which is less known non-sarcomeric candidate gene. In addition, we did extensive review of the literature and databases about JPH2 variation in association with cardiac disease. We characterize nine Finnish index patients with HCM and heterozygous for JPH2 c.482C>A, p.(Thr161Lys) variant were included and segregation studies were performed. We identified 20 individuals affected with HCM with or without systolic heart failure and conduction abnormalities in the nine Finnish families with JPH2 p.(Thr161Lys) variant. We found 26 heterozygotes with the variant and penetrance was 71% by age 60 and 100% by age 80. Co-segregation of the variant with HCM phenotype was observed in six families. Main clinical features were left ventricular hypertrophy, arrhythmia vulnerability and conduction abnormalities including third degree AV-block. In some patients end-stage severe left ventricular heart failure with normal or mildly enlarged diastolic dimensions was detected. In conclusion, we propose that the heterozygous JPH2 p.(Thr161Lys) variant is a new Finnish mutation causing atypical HCM.

Vascular healing early after titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent implantation assessed by optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents (BASs) were demonstrated in prior studies. In a prospective registry, we sought to explore the extent of neointimal coverage of stent struts by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 30 days following the implantation of BASs in an unselected non-diabetic population. METHODS: We enrolled 20 consecutive nondiabetic patients who underwent BAS implantation. OCT images were obtained at 30-day follow-up. Binary stent strut coverage was defined as the number of covered struts as a percentage of all analyzed struts. RESULTS: Patients underwent OCT examination at an average of 30.5 ± 5.7 days following stent implantation. In these, 411 cross-sections were analyzed, including 3780 struts. Binary stent strut coverage was 97.2%, and the prevalence of malapposed struts was 3.2%. Mean neointimal thickness was 109.7 ± 83.6 µm. CONCLUSIONS: In the current evaluation by OCT at 30-day follow-up after BAS implantation in an unselected non-diabetic cohort, binary stent strut coverage was satisfactory and the prevalence of malapposed struts was low.

Long-term safety of drug-eluting stents in patients on warfarin treatment.

BACKGROUND: The safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients on long-term warfarin treatment has been questioned due to high risk of bleeding complications during prolonged triple (aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin) antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: We analysed the long-term outcome of 415 consecutive warfarin-treated patients who underwent DES (n = 191) or bare-metal (n = 224) stenting in six hospitals. RESULTS: The mean duration of triple therapy was longer (4.2 ± 3.1 versus 2.1 ± 1.8 months; P < 0.001) in the DES group. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was comparable in the DES and bare-metal groups (39.8% versus 42.4%; P = 0.59) during a median follow-up of 3.5 years. Similarly, major bleeding events occurred equally often in both study groups (14.7% versus 12.9%). Six patients in the DES group and seven patients in the bare-metal group suffered stent thrombosis (3.1% versus 3.1%). In the propensity score analyses of 101 matched pairs, the outcome was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Selective use of DES with a short triple therapy seems to be safe in patients with warfarin therapy. The prognosis of this fragile patient population is quite poor, and major bleeding events are common irrespective of stent type.

Long-term clinical outcome with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in an unselected population.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical events in patients treated with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bio-active stents (BAS) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: All patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were eligible for this single-centre registry between May 2003 and November 2004. The primary end point of the study was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years including myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: A total of 201 patients received BAS and 204 patients PES. In addition, during the same study period, 184 patients were treated with bare-metal stents (BMS) and 125 patients underwent CABG. Complete follow-up datasets were available in all patients. After 3 years of follow-up, the rate of MACE was 13.9% for BAS and 23.5% for PES (adjusted HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, p=0.006). This difference was mainly driven by a higher incidence of MI in the PES group (19.1%) compared with the BAS (7.5%) group (adjusted HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.8, p<0.001). The rate of MACE was 31.5% in the BMS group and 4% in the CABG group. At 3 years, stent thrombosis occurred in 15 patients in the PES (7.4%) group. There was no stent thrombosis in the BAS group. CONCLUSIONS: After the 3 year follow-up, BAS resulted in better long-term outcome compared with PES with infrequent need for TVR.

Usefulness of outpatient bleeding risk index to predict bleeding complications in patients with long-term oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting.

Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) prevents recurrent thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke, but it also increases bleeding risk. An outpatient bleeding risk index (OBRI) may help to identify patients at high risk of bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of OBRI in patients with OAC undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition, we analyzed the impact of OBRI on treatment choices in this patient group. Four hundred twenty-one patients with OAC underwent PCI at 6 centers in Finland. Complete follow-up was achieved in all patients (median 1,276 days). Sixty-four patients (15%) had a low bleeding risk (OBRI 0), 319 patients (76%) moderate bleeding risk (OBRI 1 to 2), and 38 (9%) high bleeding risk (OBRI 3 to 4). OBRI had no significant effect on periprocedural or long-term antithrombotic medications, choice of access site, or stent type. During follow-up, the incidence of major bleeding increased (p = 0.02) progressively with higher OBRI category (6.3%, 14.1%, and 26.3%, respectively). Similarly, mortality was highest in patients with high OBRI (14.1%, 20.7%, and 39.5%, p = 0.009, respectively), but rates of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were comparable in the OBRI categories. In conclusion, bleeding risk seems not to modify periprocedural or long-term treatment choices in patients after PCI on home warfarin. In contrast, patients with high OBRI often have major bleeding episodes and this simple index seems to be suitable for risk evaluation in this patient group.