Prognostic 18F-FDG PET biomarkers in metastatic mucosal and cutaneous melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4.

PURPOSE: To compare the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers derived from a quantitative analysis of baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with mucosal melanoma (Muc-M) or cutaneous melanoma (Cut-M) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric study, we included 56 patients with non-resectable Muc-M (n = 24) or Cut-M (n = 32) who underwent baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT before treatment with ICIs between 2011 and 2017. Parameters were extracted from (i) tumoral tissues: SUVmax, SUVmean, TMTV (total metabolic tumor volume), and TLG (total lesion glycolysis) and (ii) lymphoid tissues: BLR (bone marrow-to-liver SUVmax ratio) and SLR (spleen-to-liver SUVmax ratio). Association with survival and response was evaluated using Cox prediction models, Student's t tests, and Spearman's correlation respectively. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Majority of ICIs were anti-PD1 (92.9%, n = 52/56). All 18F-FDG-PET/CT were positive. Overall (Muc-M to Cut-M), ORR was 33%:42%, DCR was 56%:69%, median follow-up was 25.0:28.9 months, median PFS was 4.7:10.7 months, and median OS was 23.9:28.3 months. In Muc-M, increased tumor SUVmax was associated with shorter OS while it was not correlated with PFS, ORR, or DCR. In Cut-M, increased TMTV and increased BLR were independently associated with shorter OS, shorter PFS, and lower response (ORR, DCR). CONCLUSION: While all Muc-M and Cut-M were FDG avid, prognostic imaging biomarkers differed. For Muc-M patients treated with ICI, the only prognostic imaging biomarker was a high baseline maximal glycolytic activity (SUVmax), whereas for Cut-M patients, baseline metabolic tumor burden or bone marrow metabolism was negatively correlated to ICI response duration.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Nuclear Medicine Operations Including Cardiovascular Manifestations in the USA.

The pandemic of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) not only directly causes high morbidity and mortality of the disease, but also indirectly affects patients with pre-existing medical conditions, particularly cardiovascular diseases, with delayed or deferred outpatient care and procedure including nuclear medicine studies because of concerns about exposure to the virus. In this article, the impact of COVID-19 on hospital operation and nuclear medicine practice in the United States along with recommendations and guidance from major academic organizations are presented. Safe operation of specific nuclear medicine scans, such as lung scintigraphy and nuclear cardiac imaging, are reviewed in the context of balancing benefits to patients against the risk of exacerbating the spread of the virus. Thoughtful reintroduction of nuclear medicine services are discussed based on ethical considerations that maximize benefits to those who are likely to benefit most, taking into consideration baseline health inequities, and ensuring that all decisions reflect best available evidence with transparent communication. Finally, potential correlation between decreased volume of nuclear cardiac studies performed during the pandemic and corresponding increased deaths from ischemic and hypertensive cardiac disease is discussed.